www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph
Received 14 January 2002; received in revised form 6 September 2002; accepted 10 September 2002
Abstract
In the Ecuadorian Andes, episodic slope movements comprising shallow rotational and translational slides and rapid flows
of debris and soil material are common. Consequently, not only considerable financial costs are experienced, but also major
ecological and environmental problems arise in a larger geographical area. Sediment production by slope movement on
hillslopes directly affects sediment transport and deposition in downstream rivers and dams and morphological changes in the
stream channels. In developing countries world-wide, slope movement hazards are growing: increasing population pressure and
economic development force more people to move to potentially hazardous areas, which are less suitable for agriculture and
rangelands.
This paper describes the methods used to determine the controlling factors of slope failure and to build upon the results of
the statistical analysis a process-based slope stability model, which includes a dynamic soil wetness index using a simple
subsurface flow model. The model provides a time-varying estimate of slope movement susceptibility, by linking land-use data
with spatially varying hydrologic (soil conductivity, evapotranspiration, soil wetness) and soil strength properties. The slope
stability model was applied to a high Andean watershed (Gordeleg Catchment, 250 ha, southern Ecuadorian Andes) and was
validated by calculating the association coefficients between the slope movement susceptibility map of 2000 and the spatial
pattern of active slope movements, as measured in the field with GPS. The proposed methodology allows assessment of the
effects of past and future land-use change on slope stability. A realistic deforestation scenario was presented: past land-use
change includes a gradual fragmentation and clear cut of the secondary forests, as observed over the last four decades (1963
2000), future land-use change is simulated based on a binary logistic deforestation model, whereby it was assumed that future
land-use change would continue at the same rate and style as over the last 37 years (1963 2000).
D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Land-use change; Infinite slope analysis; Hydrology; Slope movement; Andean watershed
* Corresponding author. Laboratory for Experimental Geomorphology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Redingenstraat 16B, 3000 Leuven,
Belgium. Tel.: +32-16-32-64-28; fax: +32-16-32-64-00.
E-mail address: veerle.vanacker@geo.kuleuven.ac.be (V. Vanacker).
0169-555X/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00263-5
300
1. Introduction
Slope movement is a widespread hazard in mountainous regions around the world (Rowbotham and
Dudycha, 1998; Dhakal et al., 1999; Guzzetti et al.,
1999). Consequently, not only considerable financial
costs are suffered, but also major ecological and
environmental problems arise in a larger geographical area (Li, 1994; Larsen and Torres-Sanchez,
1998). Due to a strong coupling between hillslopes
and stream channels in mountain environments, the
sediment mobilised by slope failure invokes
increased downstream sediment load (Froehlich and
Starkel, 1995; Hovius et al., 2000). When the supply
of failed material is larger than stream transport
capacity, a dam may be created, causing upstream
flooding and downstream flash floods after dam
failure. In developing countries world-wide, slope
movement risks are likely to grow as increasing
population pressure, together with economic development, are forcing more people to move to unstable
hillside areas (Smyth and Royle, 2000; Barnard et
al., 2001).
The prediction of the areas that are particularly
sensitive to slope movement through the development of stochastic or process-based susceptibility
models has been the goal of extensive research
(e.g. Carrara et al., 1991; Montgomery and Dietrich,
1994; Guzzetti et al., 1999). In stochastic susceptibility models, the spatial distribution of slope movements is evaluated with reference to physical
parameters, such as topographic terrain attributes,
lithology, vegetation cover, climatic data and distance
to stream channels. A susceptibility model is then
constructed using a site-specific combination of these
physical parameters. Several stochastic models have
highlighted the importance of vegetation cover in
controlling slope failure (Dhakal et al., 1999; Luckman et al., 1999; Baeza and Corominas, 2001).
Process-based spatially distributed models specifically include the physical processes involved in slope
failure and can therefore be applied to larger geographical areas. In contrast to the stochastic susceptibility models, the prediction of slope failure is
usually based solely upon topographical attributes,
sometimes used in combination with a spatial varying soil wetness index (e.g. Montgomery and Dietrich, 1994; Gritzner et al., 2001). Compared to the
2. Study site
The Ecuadorian Andes is the narrowest part of the
Andes Mountains, and is only 150 180 km wide. It is
subdivided in two distinct ridges, the Cordillera Occidental and the Cordillera Oriental, separated by an
intramontane depression (Baldock, 1982; Coltorti and
Ollier, 2000). The strong altitudinal gradients (altitude
ranges from 2000 to 6310 m a.s.l. over a distance of
301
Fig. 1. Location of the Gordeleg Catchment within the southern Ecuadorian Andes. A 3D representation of the catchment is given in the inset on
the lower rightside of the map.
302
ally concentrated in the central parts of the intramontane valleys, for their temperate climate. Due to
a long precolonial cultivation history, with successive
periods of land clearing and abandonment, almost
90% of the native forests has been converted to
agricultural land (cropland and grassland) or has been
replaced by secondary woody vegetation or, more
recently, by exotic species (Hansen and Rodbell,
1995; Hofstede et al., 1998). During the last four
decades, radical socio-economic and demographic
changes induced high land pressure in the central
Inter-Andean basins (CESA, 1992). This manifests
itself in an upward movement of the agricultural
frontier, whereby the natural vegetation is increasingly
converted to agricultural lands (Hess, 1990; Wunder,
1996; Vanacker et al., in press(a,b)).
To understand the impact of land clearing, and
more specifically forest conversion, on slope stability,
a small upland catchment was selected based on (i) the
homogeneity of its geomorphologic and lithologic
settings, (ii) a recent start of the deforestation history
and (iii) the availability of good aerial photographs,
Fig. 2. Land use in the Gordeleg Catchment in 2000. The location of the two transects is indicated on the map with a black line.
303
Fig. 3. View on the western side of the Gordeleg Catchment, with secondary forest in the upstream part and grass- and croplands in the downstream
part of the catchment.
3. Input data
3.1. Slope movement inventory
Spatial distribution and classification of slope
movements was determined by systematic field surveys carried out from July to October 2000. A
simplified classification system based on the one
proposed by Cruden and Varnes (1996) was applied.
Four basic movement types were distinguished: falls,
rotational slides, translational slides and flows. A
simple form was designed and completed for each
slope movement in the field. The form contains the
following entries: (i) slope movement characteristics:
slope movement type, state of activity (i.e. active,
inactive-young and inactive-mature slope movements,
McCalpin, 1974), estimated depth of the shear plane,
304
Fig. 4. Spatial pattern of land-use changes and slope movement features in the catchment. The distribution of the slope movements by typology
is shown in the pie diagram.
305
Fig. 5. View on a typical slump movement located in grasslands close to the thalweg.
306
Table 1
Statistical summary of the analysis of variance
Significant predictor variables
(confidence level: 0.99)
Cramers V
0.141
0.140
0.108
0.088
0.068
0.055
0.051
0.049
moisture content and deformation of the failed material, such as debris and soil flows. Topographic terrain
attributes, such as slope gradient and slope aspect, are
generally of somewhat minor importance. It is important to point out that slope gradients and the elevation
of the cells affected by slope movement are significantly lower than the slope gradients and the elevation
of the remaining cells. In other words, slope movements occur mainly in low-lying areas on relatively
gentle slopes.
Moderate levels of correlation exist between elevation and a set of predictor variables, such as
horizontal distance to the thalweg (r2 = 0.28), upslope
distance to the nearest irrigation channel (r2 = 0.22),
actual land use (Cramers V = 0.35) and time of
deforestation (Cramers V = 0.30). This explains why
elevation has such a high predictive power and why
slope movements primarily occur on low-lying areas.
Actual land use is also strongly correlated with time of
deforestation (Cramers V = 0.65).
In the foregoing analysis each variable is considered separately, so that the intercorrelation that might
exist between some of the variables cannot be taken
into account: this problem can be solved by using
logistic regression analysis. Logistic regression fits
the logarithm of the odds (i.e. the probability of slope
instability divided by the probability of slope stability)
as a linear regression function of the predictor variables, through the method of maximum likelihood
(Hosmer and Lemeshow, 1989).
A logistic model was initially constructed for all
slope movements and afterwards refined for each of
the three prevailing movement types (translational and
rotational slides and flows). Considering their strong
correlation with other predictor variables, elevation
and actual land use were not included in the analysis.
The ability of all fitted models to predict slope
instability is evaluated from Table 2, which contains
the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) and estimated standard error of the parameters, the Wald v2
value, the associated probability ( P>Wald v2) and the
proportional odds ratio. The goodness-of-fit is measured as the association between the predicted probabilities and observed responses using the percentages
of concordant, discordant and tied pairs. The measure
of association that will be considered in this paper is
the Goodman Kruskal Gamma, which varies between 0 and 1, with larger values corresponding to
307
Table 2
Table of maximum likelihood estimates for the prediction of slope stability
Binary logistic models
Wald v2
Pr>v2
7.516 F 0.516
0.011 F 0.001
4.247 F 0.465
4.151 F 0.461
3.8012 F 0.474
3.743 F 0.468
0.302 F 0.076
0.017 F 0.005
0.002 F 0.001
211.4
95.6
83.5
81.1
64.5
63.9
15.7
14.7
7.9
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.005
0.99
69.87
63.50
44.75
42.23
1.35
1.02
1.00
7.597 F 1.468
0.034 F 0.009
1.670 F 0.473
2.460 F 1.118
26.8
13.1
12.8
4.8
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.028
0.97
5.42
11.70
9.820 F 0.809
4.883 F 0.729
4.481 F 0.725
4.380 F 0.743
0.008 F 0.001
0.032 F 0.006
3.887 F 0.740
0.004 F 0.001
0.326 F 0.107
0.508 F 0.219
147.3
44.9
38.2
34.74
31.48
27.87
27.59
12.79
9.24
5.39
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.003
0.020
131.96
88.34
79.83
0.99
1.03
48.74
1.00
1.39
1.66
7.062 F 0.793
0.014 F 0.002
4.154 F 0.724
3.810 F 0.733
3.728 F 0.733
3.433 F 0.743
0.335 F 0.112
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.003
0.99
63.70
45.17
41.59
30.98
1.40
79.41
53.50
32.93
27.05
25.84
21.37
8.912
Odds ratio
Positive values of the parameter estimates indicate that an increase in the parameter value will increase the probability of deforestation, a
negative value indicates the opposite. The significance of each parameter is given by the P>v2 value. The Wald v2 value gives the relative
weight of each parameter in the model and allows assessment of the role of each explanatory variable in the prediction of slope stability.
a
Positive values of planimetric curvature (%/m) indicate planimetric concavity, negative values indicate planimetric convexity.
stronger associations between the predicted probabilities and observed values (Allison, 1999).
Comparing to previous statistics, the logistic regression gives a more refined view of the predictive
power of each explanatory variable, as it takes into
account the relationship amongst all variables. The
overall slope movement susceptibility is highly
dependent on (i) the spatial distribution of soil wet-
308
based slope stability model for the area. Some distinction could be made in the controlling factors for
different movement types. Debris and earth flows (7%
of slope movements) are significantly associated with
irrigation channels, which points to a continuous
contribution of seepage water from the open irrigation
channels towards soil water content. As the irrigation
channels are rather shallow ( < 0.3 m), this seepage
water is likely to saturate the upper soil layer and to
create conditions favourable for shallow flows. Rotational and translational slides (49% and 44%, respectively, of slope movements) are more related to
increased soil moisture and soil pore water pressure
after clear-cutting of secondary forests.
4.2. Physical modelling of slope stability
The multivariate analysis clearly indicated that the
spatial and temporal distribution of rotational and
translational shallow landsliding is strongly controlled
by recent land-use changes upslope of the affected
sites and by surface topography through shallow
subsurface flow convergence, increased soil saturation
and shear strength reduction (Fig. 5). Here we built
upon the results of the statistical analysis to explore
the utility of a spatially distributed process-based
slope stability model, which combines a steady-state
hydrologic model, TOPOG, with a deterministic infinite slope stability model, to predict the location of
slope movement (OLoughlin, 1986). The spatial
organisation of different land units was taken into
account by linking land-use data with hydrologic (soil
FS
cV Dc ct cw mzcos2 a
tanuV
czsinacosa
Table 3
Model input parameters for three distinctive land-use classes
Parameter
Abbreviation
Units
z
K
T
c
c
Dc
uV
Q
E
RI
q
m
m/s
m2/s
kN/m3
kPa
kPa
j
m/s
m/s
%
m/s
Secondary
forest
1.4 10 4
2.8 10 4
12.9 F 0.11
12
30
1.1 10 7
Grassland
1.5 2.5
2.9 10 5
5.8 10 5
15.2 F 0.05
0
0
16 28
1.7 2.3 10 7
3.5 10 8
11
1.5 10 7
Cropland
3.1 10 5
6.2 10 5
15.7 F 0.08
0
11
1.5 10 7
309
Table 4
Contingency table between the mapped pattern of susceptibility to slope movement (columns) and the inventory of active flow, translational and
rotational slope movements in 2000 (rows)
Factor of safety (FS)
< 0.50
0.50 0.75
0.75 1.00
1.00 1.25
1.25 1.50
>1.50
Total
4.92
1.96
2.00
92.37
15.57
6.22
6.32
95.41
26.59
10.62
10.80
95.97
23.55
9.40
9.57
96.52
22.97
9.17
9.33
98.05
152.52
60.91
61.97
99.53
246.10
98.28
0.03
0.01
9.53
0.54
0.05
0.02
15.70
0.29
0.04
0.02
12.77
0.14
0.05
0.02
18.07
0.22
0.04
0.02
14.53
0.19
0.09
0.04
30.77
0.06
0.30
0.12
0.24
0.09
12.39
4.42
0.37
0.15
19.50
2.27
0.53
0.21
27.71
1.90
0.40
0.16
20.84
1.62
0.20
0.08
10.42
0.85
0.17
0.07
8.89
0.11
1.90
0.76
Rotational slide
Area (ha)
Total (%)
Row
Column
0.14
0.06
6.77
2.68
0.33
0.13
15.76
2.03
0.55
0.22
26.24
1.99
0.40
0.16
18.98
1.64
0.22
0.09
10.23
0.92
0.46
0.18
21.76
0.30
2.10
0.84
Total
Area (ha)
Total (%)
5.33
2.13
16.31
6.52
27.70
11.06
24.39
9.74
23.43
9.36
153.23
61.20
250.40
No landslides
Area (ha)
Total (%)
Row
Column
Earth and debris flow
Area (ha)
Total (%)
Row
Column
Translational slide
Area (ha)
Total (%)
Row
Column
P(v2)
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Cramers V
0.149
0.032
0.118
0.091
310
Table 5
Grid cell equivalents (GCE) for calculation of the travel cost
distance
Type of terrain
Maximum
velocity (km/h)
Grid cell
equivalent
Paved road
Unpaved road
Path
Hilly areas (0 30%)
Low mountainous areas (30 50%)
Mid mountainous areas (50 75%)
High mountainous areas (>75%)
60
20
6
5
4
3
2
1
3
10
12
15
20
30
Table 6
Table of maximum likelihood estimates for deforestation prediction
Binary logistic deforestation model (gamma: 0.56)
Wald v2
Pr>v2
Odds ratio
Intercept
Cost distance to river (GCE)a
Cost distance to forest border in 1963
Height (m)
Slope (%)
Cost distance to road (GCE)
Curvature (%/m)
Cost distance to village (GCE)
Aspect (j)
28.2279 F 1.4372
0.0014 F 0.0003
0.0021 F 0.0001
0.0099 F 0.0005
0.0390 F 0.0012
0.0006 F 0.0001
0.1122 F 0.0698
0.0021 F 0.0001
0.0062 F 0.0003
385.8
3023.4
2026.4
1994.5
1606.9
75.5
69.9
10.2
7.3
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.007
0.999
0.998
0.990
0.962
1.001
0.894
1.002
1.006
Fig. 6. Simulation of the effect of a realistic land-use change scenario on soil wetness and slope stability (FS = factor of safety).
311
312
5. Conclusion
Statistical analyses confirmed the hypothesis that
the overall susceptibility to slope movement is highly
dependent on recent land-use change. In particular, the
conversion from secondary forest to grassland and/or
cropland induces increased risk of shallow slope
313
years. However, the methodology also allows simulation of the effect of other land-use change scenarios, e.g. a slow-down of deforestation or reforestation
with native trees or exotic species, on the spatial
pattern of slope stability. The model simulation
clearly shows that present, past and (possible) future
slope movement patterns can only be understood and
simulated if the land-use dynamics and slope movement mechanics are jointly considered. Deforestation
does not occur randomly within the landscape but is
largely controlled by topography. As land use
strongly affects slope stability, the spatial pattern of
slope movements can only be understood and simulated if the deforestation pattern is taken into account.
Acknowledgements
The research in Ecuador was supported by the
Fund for Scientific ResearchFlanders and the
multi-disciplinary project Diagnosis and solutions
for soil degradation in the Austro Ecuatoriano,
which is funded by the Flemish Interuniversitary
Council. The authors wish to thank A. Molina, M.
Ramirez, E. Tacuri and R. Vanegas for assistance in
the field. Special appreciation is also extended to all
members of the technical staff of Programa para el
Manejo de Agua y Suelo (PROMAS), Cuenca, Ecuador.
References
Allison, P.D., 1999. Logistic Regression Using the SAS System:
Theory and Applications. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Ataroff, V., Rada, F., 2000. Deforestation impact on water dynamics
in a Venezuelan Andean cloud forest. Ambio 29, 440 444.
Baeza, C., Corominas, J., 2001. Assessment of shallow landslide
susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26, 1251 1263.
Baldock, J.W., 1982. Geologa del Ecuador. Boletn de la explicacion del mapa geologico de la Republica del Ecuador, escala
1:1,000,000. Direccion General de Geologa y Minas (D.G.
G.M.), Quito.
Barnard, P.L., Owen, L.A., Sharma, M.C., Finkel, R.C., 2001. Natural and human-induced landsliding in the Garhwal Himalaya of
northern India. Geomorphology 40, 21 35.
Basabe, P., 1998. Prevencion de Desastres Naturales en la Cuenca
del Paute. Informe Final: Projecto PreCuPa. Swiss Disaster Relief Unit (SDR/CSS), Cuenca, Ecuador.
314
Carrara, A., Cardinalli, M., Detti, R., Guzzetti, F., Pasqui, V., Reichenbach, P., 1991. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
16, 427 445.
CESA, 1992. El Deterioro de los Bosques Naturales del Callejon
Interandino del Ecuador. Central Ecuatoriana de Servicios Agricolas, Quito.
Coltorti, M., Ollier, C.D., 2000. Geomorphic and tectonic evolution
of the Ecuadorian Andes. Geomorphology 32, 1 19.
Cruden, D.M., Varnes, D.J., 1996. Landslide types and processes.
Landslides Investigation and Mitigation. Transportation Research Board, SR 247, Washington.
Dhakal, A.S., Amada, T., Aniya, M., 1999. Landslide hazard mapping and the application of GIS in the Kulekhani Watershed,
Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 19, 3 16.
Dercon, G., 2001. Tillage erosion assessment in the Austro Ecuatoriano. Dissertationes de Agricultura N. 466, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Desmet, P.J.J., Govers, G., 1996a. Comparison of routing algorithms for digital elevation models and their implications for
predicting ephemeral gullies. International Journal of GIS 10,
311 331.
Desmet, P.J.J., Govers, G., 1996b. A GIS procedure for automatically calculating the USLE LS factor on topographically complex landscape units. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 51,
427 433.
FAO, 1998. World Reference base for soil resources. World Soil
Resource Report no. 84. ACCO, Leuven.
Froehlich, W., Starkel, L., 1995. The response of slope and channel
systems to various types of extreme rainfalla comparison between the temperate zone and humid tropics. Geomorphology
11, 337 345.
Geoghegan, J., Villar, S.C., Klepeis, P., Mendoza, P.M., OgnevaHimmelberger, Y., Chowdhury, R.R., Turner, B.L., Vance, C.,
2001. Modelling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatan
peninsular region: comparing survey and satellite data. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, 25 46.
Gritzner, M.L., Marcus, W.A., Aspinall, R., Custer, S.G., 2001.
Assessing landslide potential using GIS, soil wetness modelling
and topographic attributes, Payette River, Idaho. Geomorphology 37, 149 165.
Guzzetti, F., Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Reichenbach, P., 1999.
Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques
and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31, 181 216.
Hansen, B.C.S., Rodbell, D.T., 1995. A late-glacial/Holocene pollen record from the eastern Andes of Northern Peru. Quaternary
Research 44, 216 227.
Hess, C.G., 1990. Moving up moving down: agro-pastoral
land-use patterns in the Ecuadorian paramos. Mountain Research and Development 10, 333 342.
Hofstede, R., Lips, J., Jongsma, W., Sevink, J., 1998. Geografa,
Ecologa y Forestacion de la Sierra Alta del Ecuador Abya-Yala,
Quito.
Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., 1989. Applied Regression Analysis.
Wiley, New York.
Hovius, N., Stark, C.P., Chu, H.T., Lin, J.C., 2000. Supply and
removal of sediment in a landslide-dominated mountain belt:
central Range, Taiwan. Journal of Geology 108, 73 89.
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Electrificacion (INECEL), 1992. Topographical map of Santa AnaZhidmad 1:10.000. INECEL,
Quito.
International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences,
1999. ILWIS 2.2 for Windows, the Integral Land and Water
Information System: reference guide. ILWIS Development,
ITC, Enschede.
Keating, P.L., 1999. Changes in paramo vegetation along an elevation gradient in southern Ecuador. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 126, 159 175.
Larsen, M.C., Torres-Sanchez, A.J., 1998. The frequency and distribution of recent landslides in three montane tropical regions
of Puerto Rico. Geomorphology 24, 309 331.
Li, T.C., 1994. Landslide disasters and human responses in China.
Mountain Research and Development 14, 341 346.
Luckman, P.G., Gibson, R.D., Derose, R.C., 1999. Landslide erosion risk to New Zealand pastoral steeplands productivity. Land
Degradation and Development 10, 49 65.
McCalpin, J., 1974. Preliminary age classification of landslides for
inventory mapping. Proceedings of 21st Annual Symposium on
Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering, Pocatello, Idaho,
pp. 99 111.
Miller, D.J., Sas, J., 1998. Deciphering large landslides: linking
hydrological, groundwater and slope stability models through
GIS. Hydrological Processes 12, 923 941.
Montgomery, D.R., Dietrich, W.E., 1994. A physically based model
for the topographical control on shallow landsliding. Water Resources Research 30, 1153 1171.
OLoughlin, E.M., 1986. Prediction of surface saturation zones in
natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resources
Research 22, 794 804.
Programa para el Manejo de Agua y Suelo (PROMAS), 2001.
Estaciones Meteorologicas, Informe Interno del Proyecto Metodos de Riego y Control de Erosion en Suelos Andinos. Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Quinn, P., Beven, K., Chevallier, P., Planchon, O., 1991. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrological Processes 5,
59 79.
Rowbotham, D.N., Dudycha, D., 1998. GIS modelling of slope
stability in Phewa Tal Watershed, Nepal. Geomorphology 26,
151 170.
SAS Institute, 1990. SAS/STAT Users Guide, Vol. 2. SAS Institute,
Cary, NC.
Selby, M.G., 1993. Hillslope Materials and Processes. Oxford Univ.
Press, New York.
Serneels, S., Lambin, E.F., 2001. Proximate causes of land-use
change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model.
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, 65 81.
Smyth, C.G., Royle, S.A., 2000. Urban landslide hazards: incidence
and causative factors in Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
Applied Geography 20, 95 117.
Vanacker, V., Govers, G., Tacuri, E., Poesen, J., Dercon, G., Cisneros, F., 2000. Using sequential aerial photographs to detect
315
Veneklaas, E.J., Vanek, R., 1990. Rainfall interception in two tropical montane rain-forests, Colombia. Hydrological Processes 4,
311 326.
Willems, E., 1999. Landgebruiksdynamiek in de Hoge Ecuadoriaanse Andes. Unpublished Eng. thesis. Faculty of Agricultural
and Applied Biological Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit
Leuven, Belgium.
Wunder, S., 1996. Deforestation and the uses of wood in the
Ecuadorian Andes. Mountain Research and Development 16,
367 382.
Zevenbergen, L.W., Thorne, C.R., 1987. Quantitative analysis of
land surface topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 12, 47 56.