English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

Form:
Design

Absent or
Below Basic
Figures or formatting do
not match the papers
purpose or are not
explained by author.

Developing

Proficient

Some figures and

formatting help author
achieve purpose.

Designincluding figures
and formathelps author
achieve purpose.

Form: Genre

Generic conventions are

not employed.

Follows most generic

conventions (whether for
instruction manual, cover
letter, etc.)

Follows generic
conventions (whether for
instruction manual, cover
letter, etc.).

Content:
Information

Fails to provide most of

the required information.

Supplies some necessary

information.

Supplies all necessary

information.

Content:
Support

Typically does not

support claims with
evidence. Sometimes
tries to support claims
with additional claims or
personal opinion.

Supports a few claims with

evidence, although the
evidence could at times be
more specific or relevant.

Supports most claims with

specific, relevant details
and/or evidence.

Advanced
Designincluding
figures and format
helps author achieve
purpose with style.
Resume format is
used correctly. It is
eye appealing. The
bullet points and
headings allow for
easy skimming.
Follows generic
conventions (whether
for instruction manual,
cover letter, etc.)
consistently and with
sophistication.
Resume genre is
achieved through the
use of action words
such as organized,
exemplified etc.
The objective is
concise.
Supplies all necessary
information with
sophistication.
Information is
supplied and
organized through
use of headings and
chunking.
Supports all claims with
specific, relevant details
and/or evidence.
Employs different types
of evidence.
The claim (objective)
is provide with
enough evidence
from the subheadings
and information.

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

Content:
Organization

Frequently unorganized:
difficult to find a clear
relationship between
paragraphs or sentences.
Headings are
inappropriate, unclear or
absent.

Demonstrates some signs

of organization, but
occasionally includes
abrupt or illogical shifts and
ineffective sequence of
ideas. Headings may not
be appropriate or clear.

Effectively ordered
paragraphs generally
cover only one topic each
and are linked with useful
transitions. Headings are
usually appropriate and
clear.
Sentences typically flow
logically.

Citations:

Omits or uses incorrectly

MLA- or APA-style
parenthetical citations,
quotation marks, and
works cited list. Drops
quotations and ideas into
text without introducing
source.

A few errors in MLA- or APAstyle parenthetical

citations, quotation marks,
and works cited list. Often
includes sources names
without introduction.

Correctly uses MLA- or

APA-style parenthetical
citations, quotation
marks, and works cited
list. Usually introduces
each source fullyyou
know who did the
research or talking, for
whom, and why.

Readability:

Spelling, syntax, diction,

or punctuation errors
impede readability.

Spelling, syntax, diction, or

punctuation errors impede
readability or otherwise
distract from meaning.

Spelling, syntax, diction,

or punctuation errors are
few and do not distract
from meaning.

Effectively ordered
paragraphs cover only
one topic each and are
generally linked with
useful transitions.
Headings are
appropriate and clear.
Sentences flow logically
to persuade reader.
Resume headings
flow in a natural
order.
Correctly uses MLA- or
APA-style parenthetical
citations, quotation
marks, and works cited
list. Introduces each
source fullyyou know
who did the research or
talking, for whom, and
why.
N/A
Outstanding control of
language, including
effective diction and
sentence variety.
Language is concise
and clear. Good
choice in wording.
The resume
experience section
flows perfectly.

Comments: On what two or three areas do you think this writer needs to focus before submitting this document?
1. Focus on setting the dates on the right side on the same vertical line to achieve a vertical whitespace
2. Maybe put heading on left side of the resume

Peer Reviewed by: Marisol Davila

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

Form:
Design

Absent or
Below Basic
Figures or formatting do
not match the papers
purpose or are not
explained by author.

Developing

Proficient

Advanced

Some figures and

formatting help author
achieve purpose.

Designincluding figures
and formathelps author
achieve purpose.

Designincluding
figures and format
helps author achieve
purpose with style.

Form: Genre

Generic conventions are

not employed.

Follows most generic

conventions (whether for
instruction manual, cover
letter, etc.)

Follows generic
conventions (whether for
instruction manual, cover
letter, etc.).

Follows generic
conventions (whether
for instruction manual,
cover letter, etc.)
consistently and with
sophistication.

Content:
Information

Fails to provide most of

the required information.

Supplies some necessary

information.

Supplies all necessary

information.

Content:
Support

Typically does not

support claims with
evidence. Sometimes
tries to support claims
with additional claims or
personal opinion.
Frequently unorganized:
difficult to find a clear
relationship between
paragraphs or sentences.
Headings are
inappropriate, unclear or
absent.

Supports a few claims with

evidence, although the
evidence could at times be
more specific or relevant.

Supports most claims with

specific, relevant details
and/or evidence.

Supplies all necessary

information with
sophistication.
Supports all claims with
specific, relevant details
and/or evidence.
Employs different types
of evidence.

Demonstrates some signs

of organization, but
occasionally includes
abrupt or illogical shifts and
ineffective sequence of
ideas. Headings may not
be appropriate or clear.

Effectively ordered
paragraphs generally
cover only one topic each
and are linked with useful
transitions. Headings are
usually appropriate and
clear.
Sentences typically flow
logically.

Content:
Organization

Effectively ordered
paragraphs cover only
one topic each and are
generally linked with
useful transitions.
Headings are
appropriate and clear.
Sentences flow logically
to persuade reader.

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

Citations:

Omits or uses incorrectly

MLA- or APA-style
parenthetical citations,
quotation marks, and
works cited list. Drops
quotations and ideas into
text without introducing
source.

A few errors in MLA- or APAstyle parenthetical

citations, quotation marks,
and works cited list. Often
includes sources names
without introduction.

Readability:

Spelling, syntax, diction,

or punctuation errors
impede readability.

Spelling, syntax, diction, or

punctuation errors impede
readability or otherwise
distract from meaning.

Correctly uses MLA- or

APA-style parenthetical
citations, quotation
marks, and works cited
list. Usually introduces
each source fullyyou
know who did the
research or talking, for
whom, and why.
Spelling, syntax, diction,
or punctuation errors are
few and do not distract
from meaning.

Correctly uses MLA- or

APA-style parenthetical
citations, quotation
marks, and works cited
list. Introduces each
source fullyyou know
who did the research or
talking, for whom, and
why.
Outstanding control of
language, including
effective diction and
sentence variety.

Comments: On what two or three areas do you think this writer needs to focus before submitting this document?
The only things I think you could work on are putting periods at the end of your sentences and maybe making it all fit on one page. Otherwise
I think it is great.

Peer Reviewed by: Brittney Wheeler

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

Form:
Design

Absent or
Below Basic
Figures or formatting do
not match the papers
purpose or are not
explained by author.

Developing

Proficient

Advanced

Some figures and

formatting help author
achieve purpose.

Designincluding figures
and formathelps author
achieve purpose.
Some errors with spacing

Designincluding
figures and format
helps author achieve
purpose with style.

Form: Genre

Generic conventions are

not employed.

Follows most generic

conventions (whether for
instruction manual, cover
letter, etc.)

Follows generic
conventions (whether for
instruction manual, cover
letter, etc.).

Follows generic
conventions (whether
for instruction manual,
cover letter, etc.)
consistently and with
sophistication.

Content:
Information

Fails to provide most of

the required information.

Supplies some necessary

information.

Supplies all necessary

information.

Content:
Support

Typically does not

support claims with
evidence. Sometimes
tries to support claims
with additional claims or
personal opinion.
Frequently unorganized:
difficult to find a clear
relationship between
paragraphs or sentences.
Headings are
inappropriate, unclear or
absent.

Supports a few claims with

evidence, although the
evidence could at times be
more specific or relevant.

Supports most claims with

specific, relevant details
and/or evidence.

Supplies all necessary

information with
sophistication.
Supports all claims with
specific, relevant details
and/or evidence.
Employs different types
of evidence.

Demonstrates some signs

of organization, but
occasionally includes
abrupt or illogical shifts and
ineffective sequence of
ideas. Headings may not
be appropriate or clear.

Omits or uses incorrectly

MLA- or APA-style
parenthetical citations,
quotation marks, and
works cited list. Drops
quotations and ideas into
text without introducing
source.

A few errors in MLA- or APAstyle parenthetical

citations, quotation marks,
and works cited list. Often
includes sources names
without introduction.

Effectively ordered
paragraphs generally
cover only one topic each
and are linked with useful
transitions. Headings are
usually appropriate and
clear.
Sentences typically flow
logically.
Correctly uses MLA- or
APA-style parenthetical
citations, quotation
marks, and works cited
list. Usually introduces
each source fullyyou
know who did the
research or talking, for
whom, and why.

Content:
Organization

Citations:

Effectively ordered
paragraphs cover only
one topic each and are
generally linked with
useful transitions.
Headings are
appropriate and clear.
Sentences flow logically
to persuade reader.
Correctly uses MLA- or
APA-style parenthetical
citations, quotation
marks, and works cited
list. Introduces each
source fullyyou know
who did the research or
talking, for whom, and
why.

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

Readability:

Spelling, syntax, diction,

or punctuation errors
impede readability.

Spelling, syntax, diction, or

punctuation errors impede
readability or otherwise
distract from meaning.

Spelling, syntax, diction,

or punctuation errors are
few and do not distract
from meaning.
Not all verb tenses are
the same in the bullet
points

Outstanding control of
language, including
effective diction and
sentence variety.

Comments: On what two or three areas do you think this writer needs to focus before submitting this document?
I would say focus on spacing and verb tenses but besides that it looks really professional and good!

Peer Reviewed by: Diana Shirley

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents

English 360 Portfolio Rubric for Revised Documents