Unitat de Biofsica, Departament de Bioqumica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Medicina and Centre d'Estudis en Biofsica (CEB), UAB, Spain
Departament de Fisicoqumica, Facultat de Farmcia, UB, Spain
Institut de Nanocincia i Nanotecnologia IN2UB, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 3 June 2014
Received in revised form 14 July 2014
Accepted 28 July 2014
Available online 2 August 2014
Keywords:
Biomembranes
Phase diagram
Atomic force microscopy
Force spectroscopy
1. Introduction
In strictly physical terms, the plasma membrane can be seen as
the boundary region that separates the discrete mass of the
cytoplasm from its outer environment. This membrane, consisting
mainly of a phospholipid bilayer and proteins interacting in various
ways, is recognized as a heterogeneous structure that provides the
basis not only for cell compartmentalization but also for specic
metabolic processes to take place, among which are processes
from signal or energy transduction to transport of drugs and
metabolites, viral and bacterial infections, or tissue development
and metastasis. In this respect, characterization of the physicochemical properties of the plasma membrane is crucial to
understanding the molecular aspects behind these processes.
Biological membranes contain a complex mixture of lipid species
that, depending on their molecular structure and physicochemical
209
210
Fig. 1. Normalized excess heat capacity proles for large multilamellar liposomes of
POPE:POPG mixtures at the indicated molar ratios. The total phospholipid
concentration was 2.0 mg mL1 and the heating scan rate was 0.44 C min1.
Table 1
Thermodynamic parameters obtained from the thermograms and from tting the
AFM data to the van't Hoff equation.
xPOPG
0.25
0.50
0.75
Tm ( C)
DSC
AFM
23.50 0.15
27.80 0.12
23.70 0.13
24.35 0.15
19.30 0.10
25.85 0.03
DtransfH
DSC
17.7 0.2
18.9 0.2
24.7 0.2
AFM
1560 150
1600 300
980 30
(kJ mol1)
DHAFM/DHDSC
87
85
40
Fig. 2. (A) Phase diagram for POPE:POPG mixtures obtained from the heat capacity
curves shown in Fig. 1. Empty circles correspond to the experimental Tonset and lled
circles to the Toffset of the main phase transition. (B) Phase diagram of POPE:POPG
mixtures obtained from the AFM topography images. Empty squares correspond to
the experimental T where the rst La domain appeared and lled squares
correspond to the experimental T where the last Lb domain vanished. Error bars
correspond to standard deviations in at least three replicate experiments, if not
shown means they are inside the symbol.
211
Fig. 3. AFM images of POPE:POPG phospholipid bilayers with xPOPG = 0.25 (A, D, G), xPOPG = 0.50 (B, E, H) and xPOPG = 0.75 (C, F, I) at 23, 27 and 29 C. White stars correspond to
mica surface, black arrows in image C correspond to La domains and white dotted lines correspond to height proles shown at the bottom of each composition. Z scale bar was
20 nm except for images (C, F, I) that was 10 nm.
212
1u
(1)
DHvH is the van't Hoff molar enthalpy. Then, by inserting Eq. (2) in
(1) we obtain the following expression:
1
h
i
1 exp DHRvH 1T T1m
(3)
would explain why the DHvH are higher for SLBs than DH for
liposomes (Richter et al., 2005; Yokoyama et al., 2013). For the SLBs
at xPOPG = 0.25 and 0.5, the magnitudes of the DHvH are quite
similar ( 1600 kJ mol1), but for the SLB at xPOPG = 0.75 it
decreases to 980 kJ mol1. Such a difference can be attributed to
the high negative charge present in the latter composition (see the
zeta potential values for each composition provided as Supporting
information, SII6), which increases the electrostatic repulsion
between the bilayer and the substrate and results in a decrease of
DHvH . The approximate number of lipids experiencing the
transition as a single unit, interpreted as the cooperativity unit
(Gennis, 1989), is given by N = DHAFM/DHDSC. The N values are
87 and 85 for the SLBs with xPOPG = 0.25 and 0.50, respectively, and
40 for the SLB at xPOPG = 0.75. This makes clear that, as the
proportion of negatively charged phospholipid increases in the
SLBs, the cooperativity unit of the transformation decreases. It is
most likely related with the fact that Ca2+ induces phase separation
because of its ability to bind stoichiometrically to negatively
charged phospholipids (e.g. POPG). Thus, it results in a reduction of
their surface charge and area with consequent increase in the
transition temperature and the promotion of a bilayer with a more
gel-like nature than in absence of the bivalent cation (Tokutomi
et al., 1981; Pedersen et al., 2006). This behaviour can explain the
quantitative differences found when comparing with other N
values obtained in the same system in absence of Ca2+ (Seeger
et al., 2009b). The decrease in N on the increase in the POPG molar
fraction might also be related, at least at 23 C, with the postulated
existence of a miscibility gap in the Lb phase when xPOPG > 0.7
(Pozo Navas et al., 2005; Garidel et al., 2005). It should be noted,
however, that the AFM experiments performed on SLBs did not
have enough resolution to provide visual evidence for the
existence of these two different Lb domains.
Supplementry material related to this article found, in the
online
version,
at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.
2014.07.009.
3.3. Nanomechanics of SLBs
Force spectroscopy has been extensively used to probe the
nanomechanical properties of lipid layers (Picas et al., 2010d;
213
Fig. 4. Schematic representation of the experimental procedure used to obtain threshold and adhesion forces. (Right) Topographic images were rst acquired to visualize the
phospholipid domains and thereafter the AFM tip was centered in the domain chosen for analysis. (Left) Real force curve on a lipid domain. First, tip approaches (blue line) to
the surface (a), it touches the surface, it begins to press down the SLB (b) until the force is enough to punch the bilayer (breakthrough force) and the tip continues pressing the
mica surface (c). Afterwards, the tip begins to separate (red line) from the mica surface (d) until the tip is completely free from the sample (adhesion force) and the tip moves
away from the sample (a).
214
Fig. 5. Fy distribution for xPOPG = 0.25 (A, B), xPOPG = 0.50 (C, D) and xPOPG = 0.75 (E, F), at 27 C in the La and Lb lipid domains. Fits to the continuum nucleation model (Eq. (4)
are represented as solid lines.
Table 2
Mean Fy and Fadh values from data presented in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. Data in
Fig. 5 was tted to the continuum nucleation model and calculated G and S
parameters and data in Fig. 6 was tted to a Gaussian distribution. Errors values are
standard deviation from the mathematical statistics.
xPOPG
0.25
0.50
0.75
Fy (nN)
Lb
La
0.250 0.005
0.250 0.006
2.114 0.016
1.046 0.011
0.531 0.013
0.922 0.009
Fadh (nN)
Lb
La
0.450 0.006
0.175 0.006
1.119 0.010
0.278 0.002
0.54 0.02
1.115 0.019
G (nN)
Lb
La
21.8 1.6
19 3
38 2
29.9 1.1
31.0 1.7
28.0 1.0
S (mN m1)
Lb
La
9.53 0.06
6.3 0.2
6.61 0.11
9.87 0.03
17.8 0.3
7.00 0.09
215
Fig. 6. Fadh distribution for xPOPG = 0.25 (A, B), xPOPG = 0.50 (C, D) and xPOPG = 0.75 (E, F), at 27 C in the La and Lb lipid domains. Fits to a Gaussian distribution are represented
as solid lines.
means for the cohesive forces within the lms. However, the actual
force required to separate the tip from the lipid may be largely
affected by the negative charge borne by POPG and the presence of
the Ca2+ in the environment. Distributions of Fadh for each domain
at different POPG mole fractions are shown in Fig. 6. Additionally,
mean Fadh values are summarized in Table 2. For xPOPG = 0.25, two
different Fadh values, 0.450 0.006 and 0.175 0.006 nN, were
obtained for the Lb and La domains, respectively. Actually, whilst
such behaviour was observed for complex mixtures (Sullan et al.,
2009), the converse situation, higher Fadh for uid than ordered
phases was reported in neutral phospholipids (Leonenko et al.,
2007). Besides, Fadh is strongly dependent on the nature and
geometry of the tip, surface roughness and preparation procedures
(Truno-Sfarghiu et al., 2008) among other conditions (Israelachvili, 2002). Therefore, Fadh may not be considered as an intrinsic
property of the SLBs. Then, by taking into account the composition
of the uid phase it is conceivable that La presents lower adhesive
forces than Lb, which can be related with the clustering of POPG
molecules in presence of Ca2+ (Houslay and Stanley, 1982).
The Fadh for the SLB with xPOPG = 0.50 were 1.119 0.020 and
0.278 0.002 nN for the Lb and La phases, respectively. Note,
however, that for this composition the mean Fadh is 4 times higher
for the Lb than for the La phase. Conversely, the Fadh were
signicantly lower for the Lb phase (0.54 0.02 nN) than for the La
one (1.115 0.019 nN) when xPOPG = 0.75 (Table 2), which is may be
due to a non Gaussian distribution (Fig. 6E). Strikingly, for this
composition the Fy values for the La phase result from a strong
repulsion with the tip (Picas et al., 2009) although the Fadh values
suggest a strong cohesion of the lm. Although the La phase is
enriched in POPG molecules and the repulsion between the
neighbour phospholipids and the AFM tip may occur, there are
enough POPE molecules to stabilize the interactions between
neighbouring lipids.
(5)
and
F s 2pRS
(6)
216
exp
F 0 F s
exp 0
dF kc vo
F F s kc vo
F Fs
c
cEi x 0
(7)
F Fs
experiments is not easily relled, which means that the SLB loses
energy in some way during this process. However, no further
defects were observed when performing force spectroscopy
experiments, which might indicate that the kinetics of the process
is faster than the time needed for a typical approach-retract cycle.
The absolute largest and lowest estimated S values correspond to
the Lb phase in the SLBs with xPOPG= 0.75 and to the La phase with
xPOPG = 0.25 (Table 2). The whole set of S values emphasizes how,
the more domains become enriched in POPG, the more difcult is
for the lm to spread into the gap between the tip and the
substrate.
where
Z
Ei x
1
x
ey
dy
y
4. Conclusions
The behaviour of POPE:POPG binary system in the presence of
10 mM of Ca2+ has been investigated in this study through the
construction of two phase diagrams: one coming from DSC
analysis of liposomes and another constructed from SLBs imaging
bytemperature-controlled AFM. Specically, obtaining a phase
diagram for SLBs is of great relevance for understanding the phase
separation phenomena when working with this mixture, widely
used as the composition that mimics the inner membrane of E. coli.
The study was completed with the force spectroscopy
nanomechanical analysis of SLBs varying the xPOPG at 27 C. The
obtained results evidenced a strong inuence of the negatively
charged PG in the system, which seems to conrm that Ca2+
interacts directly with the PG headgroup promoting a clustering
effect. Hence, we showed that the presence of divalent ions in
negatively charged bilayers can largely modify the physicochemical behaviour of the system, and therefore, it becomes important to
take it into consideration regarding SLBs formation and also
possible implications of biological relevance as the interaction
with membrane proteins.
Conict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conicts of interest.
Transparency document
The Transparency document associated with this article can be
found in the online version.
Acknowledgements
C.S.G. is recipient of a FPI fellowship from the Ministerio de
Economa y Competitividad of Spain. This work has been
supported by grant CTQ-2008-03922/BQU from Ministerio de
Ciencia e Innovacin of Spain. Authors thank the Universitat
de Barcelona for nancial support. We thank Laura Picas for
valuable insights and comments.
References
Alessandrini, A., Facci, P., 2012. Micron 43, 1212.
Alessandrini, A., Seeger, H.M., Di Cerbo, A., Caramaschi, T., Facci, P., 2011. Soft Matter
7, 7054.
Attwood, S.J., Choi, Y., Leonenko, Z., 2013. Int J. Mol. Sci. 14, 3514.
Bagatolli, L.A., 2006. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758, 1556.
Bezrukov, S.M., 2000. Curr. Opin. Colloid Int. 5, 237.
Butt, H., Franz, V., 2002. Phys. Rev. E 66, 031601.
Cross, S.E., Jin, Y., Rao, J., Gimzewski, J.K., 2007. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 780.
Denich, T.J., Beaudette, L.A., Lee, H., Trevors, J.T., 2003. J. Microbiol. Meth. 52, 149.
Drolle, E., Gaikwad, R., Leonenko, Z., 2012. Biophys. J. 103, L27.
Dufrne, Y.F., Barger, W.R., Green, J.D., Lee, G.U., 1997. Langmuir 13, 4779.
Dufrne, Y., Boland, F.T., Schneider, J., Barger, W., Lee, G., 1999. Faraday Discuss 111,
79.
Dufrene, Y.F., 2008. Nat Rev. Micro. 6, 674.
Fleming, B.D., Keough, K.M.W., 1983. Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 61, 882.
Francius, G., Domnech, ., Mingeot-Leclercq, M.P., Dufrene, Y., 2008. J. Bacteriol.
190, 7904.
Franz, V., Loi, S., Mller, H., Bamberg, E., Butt, H., 2002. Colloids Surf. B 23, 191.
Garca-Sez, A.J., Chiantia, S., Salgado, J., Schwille, P., 2007. Biophys. J. 93, 103.
Garcia-Manyes, S., Sanz, F., 2010. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1798, 741.
217
Garcia-Manyes, S., Oncins, G., Sanz, F., 2005a. Biophys. J. 89, 1812.
Garcia-Manyes, S., Oncins, G., Sanz, F., 2005b. Biophys J. 89, 1812.
Garcia-Manyes, S., Oncins, G., Sanz, F., 2005c. Biophys. J. 89, 4261.
Garcia-Manyes, S., Domnech, ., Sanz, F., Montero, M.T., Hernndez-Borrell, J.,
2007. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1768, 1190.
Garcia-Manyes, S., Redondo-Morata, L., Oncins, G., Sanz, F., 2010. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
132, 12874.
Garidel, P., Johann, C., Mennicke, L., Blume, A., 1997. Eur. Biophys. J. 26, 447.
Garidel, P., Johann, C., Blume, A., 2005. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 82, 447.
Gennis, R.B., 1989. Biomembranes: Structure and Function. Springer-Verlag, New
York.
Giocondi, M., Pacheco, L., Milhiet, P.E., Le Grimellec, C., 2001. Ultramicroscopy 86,
151.
Hain, N., Gallego, M., Reviakine, I., 2013. Langmuir 29, 2282.
Harlos, K., Eibl, H., 1980. Biochemistry (N.Y.) 19, 895.
Houslay, M.D., Stanley, K.K., 1982. Dynamics of Biological Membranes. Headington
Hill Hall, Chischester.
Ishii, S., Sadowsky, M.J., 2008. Microbes Environ. 23, 101.
Israelachvili, J., 2002. Electrostatic Forces Between Surfaces in Liquid. Academic
Press, London.
Keller, D., Larsen, N.B., Mller, I.M., Mouritsen, O.G., 2005. Phys Rev. Lett. 94, 025701.
Lee, A.G., 2004. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1666, 62.
Leonenko, Z., Finot, E., Cramb, D., 2007. In: Dopico, A. (Ed.), Atomic Force
Microscopy: Interaction Forces Measured in Phospholipid Monolayers, Bilayers,
and Cell Membranes. Humana Press, pp. 601609.
Loi, S., Sun, G., Franz, V., Butt, H., 2002. Phys Rev. E 66, 031602.
Mabrey, S., Sturtevant, J.M., 1976. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 73, 3862.
Marsh, D., 2008. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1778, 1545.
Milhiet, P., Gubellini, F., Berquand, A., Dosset, P., Rigaud, J., Le Grimellec, C., Lvy, D.,
2006. Biophys. J. 91, 3268.
Ollila, S., Hyvonen, M.T., Vattulainen, I., 2007. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 3139.
Oncins, G., Picas, L., Hernndez-Borrell, J., Garcia-Manyes, S., Sanz, F., 2007. J.
Biophys. 93, 2713.
Pedersen, U.R., Leidy, C., Westh, P., Peters, G.H., 2006. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758,
573.
Picas, L., Montero, M.T., Morros, A., Cabaas, M.E., Seantier, B., Milhiet, P.E.,
Hernndez-Borrell, J., 2009. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 4648.
Picas, L., Surez-Germ, C., Montero, M.T., Vzquez-Ibar, J.L., Hernndez-Borrell, J.,
Prieto, M., Loura, L.M.S., 2010a. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1798, 1707.
Picas, L., Carretero-Genevrier, A., Montero, M.T., Vzquez-Ibar, J.L., Seantier, B.,
Milhiet, P.E., Hernndez-Borrell, J., 2010b. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1798, 1014.
Picas, L., Montero, M.T., Morros, A., Vzquez-Ibar, J.L., Hernndez-Borrell, J., 2010c.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1798, 291.
Picas, L., Surez-Germ, C., Montero, M.T., Hernndez-Borrell, J., 2010d. J Phys.
Chem. B 114, 3543.
Picas, L., Milhiet, P., Hernndez-Borrell, J., 2012. Chem. Phys. Lipids 165, 845.
Pozo Navas, B., Lohner, K., Deutsch, G., Sevcsik, E., Riske, K.A., Dimova, R., Garidel, P.,
Pabst, G., 2005. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1716, 40.
Redondo-Morata, L., Oncins, G., Sanz, F., 2012a. Biophys. J. 102, 66.
Redondo-Morata, L., Giannotti, M.I., Sanz, F., 2012b. In: Anonymous (Ed.), Atomic
Force Microscopy in Liquid. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, pp. 259284.
Redondo-Morata, L., Giannotti, M.I., Sanz, F., 2012c. Langmuir 28, 12851.
Reviakine, I., Brisson, A., 2000. Langmuir 16, 1806.
Richter, R.P., Maury, N., Brisson, A.R., 2005. Langmuir 21, 299.
Schmidt, D., Jiang, Q., MacKinnon, R., 2006. Nature 444, 775.
Seantier, B., Kasemo, B., 2009. Langmuir 25, 5767.
Seeger, H.M., Bortolotti, C.A., Alessandrini, A., Facci, P., 2009a. J. Phys. Chem. B 113,
16654.
Seeger, H.M., Marino, G., Alessandrini, A., Facci, P., 2009b. Biophys. J. 97, 1067.
Sinensky, M., 1974. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 522.
Surez-Germ, C., Montero, M.T., Igns-Mullol, J., Hernndez-Borrell, J., Domnech,
., 2011. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 12778.
Surez-Germ, C., Domnech, ., Montero, M.T., Hernndez-Borrell, J., 2014.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1838, 842.
Sullan, R.M.A., Li, J.K., Zou, S., 2009. Langmuir 25, 7471.
Tokumasu, F., Jin, A.J., Feigenson, G.W., Dvorak, J.A., 2003. Ultramicroscopy 97, 217.
Tokutomi, S., Lew, R., Ohnishi, S., 1981. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 643, 276.
Truno-Sfarghiu, Y., Meurisse, M., Rieu, J., 2008. Langmuir 24, 8765.
Vitrac, H., Bogdanov, M., Dowhan, W., 2013. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 9338.
Weingarth, M., Prokofyev, A., van, d.C., Nand, D., Bonvin, A.M.J.J., Pongs, O., Baldus,
M., 2013. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 3983.
Yang, J., Appleyard, J., 2000. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 8097.
Yokoyama, H., Ikeda, K., Wakabayashi, M., Ishihama, Y., Nakano, M., 2013. Langmuir
29, 857.