CRITERIA
TITLE
PO2
(15%)
EXCELLENT [3]
Title is informative, succinct and offer
specific details about the issue(s)
understudy, context, and methodology of
the proposed study.
SATISFACTORY [2]
Title is relevant, offering details about the
issue(s) understudy, s, context, or
methodology of the proposed study.
POOR [1]
Title is irrelevance or fails to offer
appropriate details of the proposed
study.
PROBLEM
BACKGROUND
PROBLEM STATEMENT
RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES/
QUESTIONS
FRAMEWORK
(THEORETICAL/
CONCEPTUAL)
DEFINITIONS,
RATIONALE,
SIGNIFICANCE &
LIMITATIONS
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE REVIEW
TOTAL
RESEARCH DESIGN
SAMPLING DESIGN
METHODOLOGY
DATA COLLECTION
PROCEDURES
DATA ANALYSIS
QUALITY OF
WRITING
COMPOSITION AND
FORMATING
ETHICS
PO6
(2.5%)
PROBLEM SOLVING
*Note:
1. Plagiarism of previous theses (some parts of the theses such as chapter 1, 2 or 3) or proposals will be resulted in zero (0) mark.
2. Calculation :
PO2: ________/ 39 * 15% = ____________
PO4 : _______/ 3 * 2.5% = ____________
PO6 : _______/ 3 * 2.5% = ____________
COMPOSITE SCORE
= ____________
Score PO2
Did not state potential ethical issues
that might arise and propose
procedures to minimize or
overcome ethical issues that might
threaten the validity of the overall
findings. Quotations from various
references are inappropriate and do
not follow the UTM thesis standard
with glaring errors such as
incomplete information of
references.
Score PO4
Not able to identify problem/issue
which suitable for the proposed
methodology and analysis. The
explanation of proposed
methodology and analysis is
insufficient and lack of supporting
references.
Score PO6