Earnings Management
Author(s): Marilyn Fischer and Kenneth Rosenzweig
Source: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 14, No. 6 (Jun., 1995), pp. 433-444
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072663 .
Accessed: 19/09/2013 12:31
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Business Ethics.
http://www.jstor.org
of Students
Attitudes
Practitioners
There
can
and managers
the
influence
it
of
purpose
as
is known
practicing
students,
concerning
such influ
of reported
The
management.
is to present
this paper
of undergraduate
accountants
surveys
earnings
the
MBA
results
their
of
and
students,
on
attitudes
of earnings management.
the ethical acceptability
Analysis of the survey results reveals how the attitudes
of the three groups differ and what variables are asso
ciated with
these differences. Based on the analysis,
authors
the
curriculum
in accounting
changes
awareness
ethics
programs
education
suggest
and
in business
which
management.
in accounting
associations
Leading
on ethics
for increased
emphasis
accounting
the National
Reporting
Commission
tion:
should
"The
curricula.
Commission
made
Report)
business
emphasize
their development
called
education
in
For example,
the Report of
on Fraudulent
Financial
known
(commonly
have
and
ethical
with
as the Treadway
this recommenda
accounting
values by
the acquisition
curricula
integrating
of knowl
Professor of Philosophy at
in
Dayton, Ohio. She spe
of Dayton
cializes in workplace ethics, particularly in the nonprofit
Marilyn Fischer,
the University
edge and
fraudulent
accounting
reported
Marilyn Fischer
Kenneth Rosenzweig
Management
that accountants
units. When
the amount
the Ethical
Concerning
of Earnings
Acceptability
ABSTPJVCT.
and Accounting
is Assistant
American
and deter
82). The
has called
to
in accounting
education
to ethical
and social
sensitivity
students'
foster
(page
Association
Accounting
increased
efforts
for
detect,
Asso
(American
responsibilities
Accounting
on
ciation
Committee
the Future
Structure,
of Accounting
and Scope
Education,
Content,
andMiller
1986). Donnelly
ical
support
changing
discussion
for
accounting
professors
to include greater
curricula
as recommended
by the
among
accounting
of ethics
Commission.1
Treadway
to address
In order
these
concerns,
specific
need to be iden
Earnings man
in ethics
and accounting
topics
tified for curricular
development.
agement
is one
ambiguities
The
practice.
this paper
is to present
information
from undergraduate
students, MBA
accountants
and practicing
concerning
such
students,
their attitudes
of
this
earnings
consider
of
ethical
the
of
purpose
collected
various
because
topic
with
associated
on
the
of
acceptability
actions.
earnings management
Analysis
information
will
reveal which
types of
activities
management
respondents
to
be
ethical
and
objectionable
the
find
various
groups
respondents
to be most
activities
management
earnings
which
ethically
of
objectionable.
Knowing
management
in
ested
current
attitudes
toward
will
be helpful
for educators
concerns
ethical
integrating
It will
also
earnings
inter
into
be
useful
programs.
accounting
to businesses
and professional
own
their
they
develop
policies,
standards
and
regarding
earnings
educational
programs
management.
areas.
1995.
Journal of Business Ethics 14: 433-444,
? 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in theNetherlands.
associations
as
434M.
on
Background
and K.
Fischer
investment
management
earnings
Rosenzweig
for the
respect
public
is quite high
fession
compared
confidence
professions,
public
While
has
been
statements
preparing
organizational
fair representations
of
status; they are
trust in our
public's
cial
are
which
the organization's
in effect gatekeepers
finan
of
Therefore,
of
that members
integrity,
is one
management
Earnings
raises
about
suspicion
managers'
ment
has
practice
accountants'
integrity. Although
been
examined
there
is no widely
and/or
purposes
earnings
management.3
we define
earnings management
of a manager
which
ring to actions
increase
(decrease)
for which
the unit
of
as refer
serve
to
of
earnings
reported
the manager
is responsible
a corresponding
increase
without
generating
in the long-term
economic
(decrease)
can be
of
the
Such
actions
unit.4
itability
into
this
current
two
those
types:
methods
accounting
and
accounting
of reserves,
income. Offering
changing
amounts
thereby
of
the
managers
may
managerial
legitimate
their
responsibilities
shareholders.
management
which
mislead
There
are
view
these
tools, useful
to maximize
as
practices
for fulfilling
returns
others
view
However,
as involving
distortion
users
ethical
of financial
reasons
to
earnings
in ways
statements.
to
be
of
wary
Stakeholders
practices.
earnings management
rely
on financial
current
statements
that
assuming
are indicative
of long-term
earnings
For
stockholders
and
example,
profitability.
use these statements
in
investors
making
potential
reported
performance
resources
cerning
When
earnings
the
so
on.
in
them
Managers
to evaluate
units
level
con
decisions
to them.5
allocated
are managed
so that financial
reflect the economic
accurately
statements
do not
health
the company,
Stakeholders
of
to
utilize
and make
to be
to
refer
may
decisions.
lower
their
trust
stakeholders'
make
is
decisions
may
to their own best interest, which
contrary
they
not have made,
would
had they had undistorted
Understood
in this context,
figures.
earnings
to the "Standards
is contrary
of
management
Ethical Conduct
for Management
Accountants"
accountants
which
have a
states, "Management
.
.
. disclose
to
responsibility
fully all relevant
to
information
that could reasonably
be expected
an intended
user's understanding
and
reports,
comments,
sented"
(Institute,
the
recommendations
1983).
discretion
of the
pre
and
judgement
must
managers
accounting
practitioners
to
it is desirable
for them
have knowl
exercise,
of
and
ethical
earnings
edge
regarding
sensitivity
can
There
consider
be
management
practices.6
able
changing
reported
terms to customers
special
at yearend
to advance
sales from next year to this
of earnings management
year is an example
by
means
of an operating
decision.
Some
employees
making
employment
the statements
of
which
concerning
try to attract
and
development,
to
and
those which
example
is adjusting
methods
in making
loan decisions.
in long-term
community
as decisions
such
businesses
Prospective
Given
involve
them
infrastructure
area,
influence
prof
classi
An
decisions.
operating
which
planning,
of
types
them
use
violated.
earnings manage
in many
empirical
definition
of
accepted
paper,
net
the
which
For
changing
involve
it
have a reputation
of solid
profession
and that this reputation
be deserved.
accounting
fied
the
institutions.
important
critically
studies,2
events
by
involving
such as the savings and loan scandal.
of
the crucial
function
perform
accountants,
Accountants
is
rely
Communities
in the profession
recent
shaken
on
Banks
pro
other
accounting
to many
use them to
Suppliers may
to
with.
do
business
companies
decisions.
which
decide
pressure
on
managers
or
accountants
to
an eye
in earnings
With
engage
management.
on the stock market,
may
pressure
employers
accountants
to distort
and managers
quarterly
them look more
favorable. Also,
reports*to make
accountants
and managers
that their
may worry
own
evaluations
will
linked
be
performance
statements
less to the accuracy
of their prepared
than to how favorable
those statements
appear.7
These
the knowledge,
need
practitioners
good
to resist such pres
and moral
courage
judgment
sures. If the educational
of accountants
program
can inculcate
and managers
ethical
sensitivity
to earnings
it can
then
management,
perhaps
to
their
in
reduce
these
engage
help
tendency
practices.8
Ethical
Research
naire,
Bruns
of a questionnaire
by
to the respondents.
The
question
which
and
control
finance,
such as industrial
means
collected
administered
435
Management
accoun
design
was
Data
of Earnings
Acceptability
describing
questions
a subordinate
manager
audit
managers,
situations
various
by
and
membership
rate to our
The
includes
in which
in earnings man
engages
to rate the
is
asked
respondent
13 dependent
utilizing
Varimax
accounting,
the Chapter
the response
accounting,
public
etc. Since
accounting,
is approximately
700,
survey was about 38%.
government
of work,
were
variables
analyzed
with
Analysis
were
extracted
Principle-Components
Four factors
Rotation.
agement.
of the actions on a five-point
ethical acceptability
to completely
ethical.
scale from totally unethical
are
The
thirteen
questions
earnings management
which
of this paper.
in the Appendix
are listed in
The
three groups of respondents
student
and graduate
Table
I. Undergraduate
dent
(have
highly
four factors.
of
the cooperation
responses were obtained with
course instructors.
In most
classes, questionnaires
were
the same
and collected
distributed
during
have
the factors
the same
indicating
as
the
variables
(i.e., large
directionality
original
an ethical
indicate
values
rating and small values
The
listed
took
class. Students
about
15 minutes
to complete
The
the questionnaire.
were
uates
in
sophomore,
surveyed
senior
level
accounting
courses
on average
or
at the University
them are full-time
of respondents
Numbers
in different
an unethical
indicate
Bruns
seem
to represent
and Merchant.
on
Number
Group
122
Undergraduate
accounting
MBA
students
students
113
respondents
accounting
practitioners
Total
500
265
the
are
The
first
two
load
and Merchant
the second
the
by
factors
highly
called
two
factors
load on variables
deci
of operating
they called manipulation
to
sions. With
the accounting
respect
manipula
on all
loaded highly
tion factors,
INVMANIP
that
ACCMANIP
variables, while
inventory
change
that could be
loaded highly on all other variables
as
of accounting
different
forms
interpreted
For
the
operating
manipulation.
manipulation
on
those
loaded
highly
while
that changed
expenses,
on those operating
loaded highly
revenues.
In this regard,
that changed
OPEREXP
decisions
there was
one
able #1,
Paint
Vari
slightly anomalous
finding.
ahead of schedule,
loaded mod
on OPERREV
than on
highly
erately more
even
OPEREXP,
tion of an expense.
it involves manipula
though
it has a substantial
However,
on OPEREXP
clas
and it was therefore
loading
sified with
Four
Accounting
of
correlations
and INVMANIP)
related while
decisions
of
one
Furthermore,
rating).
dimensions
discussed
that Bruns
variables
operating
OPERREV
groups
load
variables
on
positive,
factors,
TABLE I
of the dependent
large correlations)
All of the large
(ACCMANIP
all of
of Dayton.
Virtually
the ages of 18 and 22. The
between
students
students
taking MBA
surveyed were
graduate
courses
at the University
and Wright
of Dayton
of the Institute
Dayton
Chapter
That
Accountants.
organization
All
variables.
factors
undergrad
junior,
had
rotated
that factor.
normalized
factor
scores were
calculated
Raw
factor scores
by SPSS for each respondent.
are a linear
13
combination
of the original
coef
the
variables
respective
utilizing
dependent
ficients
in Table
II. After
their
calculation,
the
436
M.
and K.
Fischer
Rosenzweig
TABLE II
Rotated
factor matrix
name
Factor
Accounting
manipulation
Var#
var name
Dependent
Paint
Defer
Defer
ahead of schedule
10
11
12
13
expend-month
Write
Write
Delay
Variance
print
raw factor
the mean
deviation
normalized
a standard
coefficients
0.59951
0.27353
-0.00577
0.00471
0.09524
0.08844
0.03296
-0.00801
0.63007
0.27530
0.21716
0.52467
0.90216
0.86899
0.17408
17.56%
indicate
dependent
deviation
of one.
These
normalized
as dependent
variables
in
the
of
analysis
place
original
variables.
are utilized
in the subsequent
thirteen
dependent
scores
to analyzing
the normalized
factor
in the paragraph
mentioned
above, we examined
of the original
13 earnings manage
the means
Prior
variables,
grouped
by
to these
earnings management
the variable means
Merchant's
accounting
ethically
-0.07746
0.05224
-0.01085
-0.04354
0.07273
15.60%
are highly
earnings
(1990)
methods
to
the factors
on which
thirteen
original
dependent
and the mean
variables
of
for
each
factor.
Bruns
and
that manipulating
finding
is much
less acceptable
respondents
than
manipulating
-0.00888
-0.05860
0.08019
correlated
with
by means
of
13.16%
the respective
factors.
is
decisions
operating
our data.
Furthermore,
strongly
supported
by
within
the operating
decision manipulation
area,
our respondeats
felt that manipulation
of deci
sions
which
the
changed
was
somewhat
(OPEREXP)
ethically
revenue
than
timing
of
timing
more
expenses
questionable
which
manipulation
changed
In the accounting
(OPERREV).
there was
little difference
area,
manipulation
between
respondents'
ratings
of manipulation
acceptability
Findings
ment
-0.03885 0.03572
0.05152
0.17370
15.48%
variables which
OPERREV
0.37999
0.38895
0.93490
0.14084
0.13049
0.92547
0.32273
-0.00023
0.00577
0.67378
0.09603
0.78812
0.14547
0.63606
0.17613
scores
factor
0.10903
0.17294
0.23840
0.82781
0.78630
expl
OPEREXP
-0.02350
-0.01924
0.04986
up inv-prod dev
up inv-profit targ
consult inv-small
consult inv-large
Delay
INVMANIP
0.04465
8
9
manipulation
-0.09561
expend-year
Record
supplies next yr
Pull sales-liberal terms
to max ships.
Overtime
4
5
6
7
Bold
ACCMANIP
decision
Operating
adjusting
inventory
other
forms
of
valuations
the
of
by
ethical
means
(INVMANIP)
accounting
of
and
manipulation
(ACCMANIP).
among groups of respondents. For each
Differences
a one-way
of the earnings management
factors,
was
to determine
ANOVA
calculated
if there
were
significant
of the
responses
differences
three
the ANOVA
indicated
existed, Tukey
if each pair of
tests were
group
groups
the mean
among
of respondents.
If
significant
differences
performed
means
was
to determine
significantly
Ethical
of Earnings
Acceptability
437
Management
TABLE III
Mean
Form
of earnings
variables,
grouped
Var
Factor
management
by factors1
Mean
of factor
variable means
Mean
var name
Dependent
9 Write
down
(Std dev)
1.79
inventory
(1.13)
10 Write
INVMANIP
dev
up inv-prod
1.89
1.75
(1.17)
11 Write
up inv-profit
1.57
targ
(1.09)
ACCOUNTING
4
Record
supplies next yr
1.73
(1.01)
8
2.04
(1.20)
ACCMANIP
12
consult
Delay
inv-small
1.78
2.11
(1.11)
13
consult
Delay
1.25
inv-large
(1.07)
1
Paint
ahead of schedule
3.80
(0.52)
2
OPEREXP
Defer
3.02
expend-month
3.18
(1.02)
3
Defer
2.71
expend-year
OPERATING
DECISION
(1.25)
5
Pull
sales-liberal
terms
3.30
(0.94)
6
OPERREV
to max
Overtime
3.58
ships.
3.49
(0.75)
7
Sell excess
3.59
assets-profit
(0.80)
4 = ethical;
different.
confidence
Table
3 = questionable;
AU
tests were
2 = moderate;
1=
at the 95%
performed
level.
IV presents
=
serious; 0
totally unethical.
The
all
the mean
for ACCMANIP,
manipulation
means
of accounting
methods,
of the factor
scores
of
by
earnings
broken
down
in
of respondents
groups
by the three main
our study. As can be seen, accounting
practi
as ethi
tioners view
accounting
manipulation
than do students.
cally much more
objectionable
violations
practice.
Accounting
the greatest
knowledge
of
practitioners
of what
accounting
have
would
these
standards
students
the least. Also,
of
because
are; MBA
their experience
with
measurements,
accounting
and to a lesser extent
practitioners,
accounting
are aware of the opportu
students,
accounting
nities for distortion
of accounting
and
numbers,
438
M.
and K.
Fischer
Rosenzweig
TABLE IV
in means
Differences
practitioners,
in means
Differences
among
and
students,
undergraduate
graduate
Group
TABLE V
of ACCMANIP
practitioners,
of INVMANIP
students
graduate
Mean
Mean
Group
Accounting
MBA
0.1011
Undergraduate
students
accounting
MBA
INVMANIP1
-0.3374
practitioners
practitioners
students
0.5347
-0.2470
0.0539
0.4894
Undergraduate
students
and
students
ACCMANIP1
Accounting
among
students,
undergraduate
students
accounting
Tukey
the deleterious
effects
of such
may
recognize
distortions.
MBA
with
their more
students,
courses
in accounting
limited
and
background
are more
this awareness.
lack
practices, may
Table V presents
for INVMANIP,
the means
earnings
scores
of the factor
management
of
also
by means
broken
tioners
by means
view
manipulation
more
much
tory
changes
adversely
students.
Practitioners'
experience
than
with
hand,
well
valuation
do
the
little
change
by it. It is interesting
repelled
the case of general
accounting
MBA
students
are more
that,
sensitive
contrary
to
manipulation,
to the ethical
than are
manipulation
For
students.
accounting
example,
undergraduate
as
to question
students
with
#9, MBA
respect
is
that judgment
know
managers
experienced
the size of the writedown
inevitable
because
dubiousness
of
upon
depends
current market
inventory
assessments
appropriate
value of inventory which
of
the
can vary
as a result of their
It appears
that,
considerably.
in
business,
experience
practical
MBA
are less
known.
scores
VI presents means
of the factor
for OPERIEXP,
of
manipulation
earnings
by
means
of operating
alter the
decisions
which
Table
with
such
experience
are
and
thus less
opportunities
have
as a source of oppor
managers
some of
for earnings manipulation,
while
other
of accounting
forms
manipulation
business
which
valuation
effects of inventory
distorting
changes
on accounting
numbers may sensitize
them to the
on
unethical
dimension
of this practice.
Students,
the other
students
than undergraduate
changes
accounting
in
who
have
limited
business.
experience
is apparently well known
Inventory manipulation
the
inven
of
of the opportunities
for earnings
means
of
valuation
inventory
by
management
among
tunities
valuations,
inventory
altering
of respondents
down by the three main
groups
our
to
in
the findings
for account
study. Similar
in general,
practi
ing manipulation
accounting
aware
students
down
broken
incurrence,
timing of expense
by
In
in our
the three respondent
groups
study.
contrast
to the findings
for the two accounting
students
view
factors,
operating
manipulation
more
than
much
expense manipulation
harshly
do
accounting
attitudes
toward
practitioners
students.
and
the undergraduate
Several
these
work
more
interpretations
One
could
findings.
in business,
common
either
alternate
present
students'
expense manipulation
operating
the middle
between
the accounting
in
fall
MBA
practitioners.
"more
lose
are
accounting
consistent
with
that as people
argue
idealism
the ethical
they
students
and become
among
or
more
An
realistic"
"calloused."
on the ambiguity
focuses
explanation
in the survey's questions
oper
regarding
Ethical
of Earnings
Acceptability
TABLE VI
in means
Differences
practitioners,
among
students,
undergraduate
possible
on
OPEREXP1
stakeholders.
culture
-0.6149
Undergraduate
students
accounting
MBA
Accounting
Accounting
have read
the latter
practitioners
these questions
and MBA
have
their
of
are
students
practitioners
accounting
more
aware of the legitimate
discretion
needed
in order to conduct
effec
business
by managers
therefore
may
have
unwilling
the manager who had responsibility
for making
the decision.
We
could find no significant differences
among
our groups
to the
with
of respondents
respect
on earnings by
manipulation
the timing of revenues.
As is
means
it
the
had
III,
highest
that all
for its high
indicating
loading variables,
in finding
of respondents
concurred
few
groups
its use.
ethical problems with
factor, OPERREV,
means
of altering
in Table
indicated
(1990)
study confirms Bruns and Merchants'
a
in
all
the
that
have
groups
surveyed
findings
for
tolerance
expense manipu
greater
operating
lation
than
accounting
manipulation.
The
fol
ethics.
if it is not
problematic
- one
does
not break
in it. Several
of the
anal
accounting
practice, while
exist
for
standards
do not
the
in
described
manipulation
questions.
view
has this rule-based
she would
the operating
If a respondent
of ethics, he or
judge accounting
manipulations
since
unethical,
they violate
rules, while
manipula
operating
as more
explicit
tions do not.
However,
a stakeholder
using
whether
open question
is more
unethical
by operating
it is an
perspective,
accounting
manipulation
than
statement
Financial
operating
manipulation.
users may be misled
as much
as by accounting
manipulation.
has a longer
accounting
profession
concern
of
codes
and
for
ethical
history
(2) The
zations'
Our
of
is not
something
one need not worry
on this view, earnings
is not
more
of
economic
tutionalization
honesty.
sitivity
reflect
"cut
a
is a fundamental
"Honesty"
value.
standards,
Accounting
to ensure
that financial
reports
adopted
give an accurate
of findings
Commandments
codes
of
or
questions
accounting
regarding
a violation
involved
of
ogous
situations
to
been
guess
Interpretation
organizational
assume
that if
survey's
questions
questions
the
experience,
and MBA
tively
second
explicit
our
list
manipulation
interpretation.
students may
as involving
so than
more
of good management,
of ethics.
Because
and
such
accepted
taken
may
rules,
explicitly
prohibited
any rules by engaging
rating.
cases could be
(#1, 2, 3). These
ating expenses
man
as
either
interpreted
involving
questionable
or
ethics.9 The
agement
practices
questionable
students
this
in
Many
people
as a
ethics
as the Ten
management
Tukey
unethical
of
expressly prohibited,
about ethics. Based
0.4391
practitioners
think
They
-0.0308
students
of
interpretations
(1) Those
surveyed may have had a rule-based
view of ethics,
rather than one based on
ethical assessments
of the decision's
effects
Mean
Group
two
finding.
and
students
graduate
are
lowing
of OPEPJiXP
439
Management
an
reflection
of
health,
of
ethical
reflect
Respondents'
to accounting
this history.
greater
organi
an insti
concern
ethical
manipulation
for
sen
may
440M.
there were
Although
groups with
differences
to operating
means
have
felt
by
revenue.
ethically
is almost
earnings
the
earnings
For
not
have
been
information
of
students
methods
on
management
The
question
to address
riculum
ethical
the
year.
taught
in a separate
course
have
some
trust
to maintaining
and
in the
accounting
profession,
should seek to
that accounting
educators
to earnings
increase
ethical
students'
sensitivity
For
management
undergrad
example,
practices.
uate
students
accounting
aware of the "real world"
make
managers
to appreciate
need
context
within
decisions.
business
that
to be made
creativity
more
which
need
They
effectiveness
and
some
require
decision-making
to rely on
that it is undesirable
such as those designed
restrictions,
explicit policy
to prevent
of
earnings management
by means
in managerial
and
latitude,
restricting
decisions.
to be
integrity
business
the
This
acutely
are
available
choices
the need
underscores
aware
that
ethics
in operating
for students
and
personal
in everyday
intertwined
deeply
the law and explicit
decisions.
Following
be a sufficient
business
earnings
in which
practices
manage
earnings
However,
many
to lead a
involved.
course
in business
ethics
Alternatively,
specific
can be valuable
with
in acquainting
students
to
about
and
them
ethical
think
inviting
theory
issues in a wider
societal
and ethical
business
context.
the public
the authors
believe
ethics.10
to
equipped
of
arise.
to questionable
management
earnings
uneven.
level
is
Given
the
of
sensitivity
practices,
the
of
how
accurate,
important
availability
to
is both
information
and reliable
relevant
success
on business
accounting
ill-equipped
professors
sustained discussion
of the ethical issues
sen
sitivity
business
earnings
managers.
in the cur
feel
business
ethical
educated
of
implications
to be addressed.
are well
professors
the methodology
contexts
and
the
management
that while
Further
management
earnings
There
is an ongoing
debate about whether
ethics
or
courses
into business
should
be integrated
ethically
if it simply
Implications
show
be
in choos
of deterring
needs
explain
ment
should
to be
need
more,
accounting
in organizational
Accounting
The
to
stress
standards. Particular
accounting
on
for
distortion
placed
opportunities
valuations.
ing alternative
inventory
be
earnings management
unacceptable
drew sales from the subsequent
accounting
ethical
accountants
More
aware
to be
management
a sales pro
but would
the
students need
specifically,
the
available
opportunities
clearly
for earnings management
and earnings distortion
even
within
the
of
parameters
acceptable
timing
example,
in the
conducted
made,
curricula
on
greater
emphasis
of managers
and
torted manner.
last month
campaign
would
of the accounting
be
year
accept
ethically
otherwise
able if it created new sales that would
motion
and MBA
accounting
responsibilities
report financial
of distinguishing
ethically
from
enhancement
programs
inappropriate
impossible.
In general,
to place
might
revenue
appropriate
with
Rosenzweig
need
may
respondents
revenues
is a vital
controlling
and
function
competitiveness.
the task
felt
have
our
among
altering
Our
that
managerial
on that function
tional
of
and K.
expense manip
that
concurred
respect
all respondents
ulation,
virtually
no
there was
ethical
problem
management
of operating
Fischer
most
However,
who
people
teach
and the
ethics, primarily
philosophers
do not
and
lack
expertise,
ologians,
accounting
to
needed
and experience
have the knowledge
man
in which
the context
understand
earnings
business
'
arise. To resolve
this problem,
pressures
to become
and
ethics
need
accounting
professors
more
the
and
with
tools
perspectives
acquainted
agement
of each
ethics
fields.
others'
and
accounting
to team
is for
teach
courses.11
difficulty with
curriculum
accounting
Commission
alternative
instructors
accounting
One
materials
Another
and
case
recommended
incentives
be given
The
such material.
that business
faculty
to develop
and opportunities
Asso
American
Accounting
on Professionalism
Project
of Management
and the Institute
case
have
studies;
developed
ciation's
and Ethics,
Accountants
the
American
Ethical
ethics
education
1989,
In
accounting
and Rockness,
(Langenderfer
to
also
implications
indicate
findings
Our
more
to become
means
bling
revenue manipulation.
to become more
operating
business
managers
ethical
responsibilities
with
should
They
such activities
manipulations.
how harmful
trust. With
public
to
need
develop
the
groups
detachment
from
that
sense
to issues
real pressures
and
earnings,
Sorensen's
be
increase
might
they may
the moral
the
with
practitioners
reported
to resist such pressures.
courage
should
these changes,
To achieve
companies
and
introduce
regarding
procedures
policies
and
A goal of business
earnings management.
should
be
adopted
in the day-to-day
Ethical
analyses of spe
environment.12
could
was
all
awareness,
of personal
the very
to distort
policies
ethical
feel
the dissonance
practitioners
help to decrease
ideals and organiza
their professional
between
to increase
In light of
tional pressures
profits.
to operating
respect
be able to recognize
are to stakeholders
a
with
employees
seminars
situations
could be
earnings management
as case studies in professional
and busi
included
ness publications.13
these changes
should
Making
to their
sensitive
Company
to attract
awareness
recruitment
cific
and
Accountants
need
feel
that practi
of opportu
aware
ethics
ethical
Explicit
on
management
earnings
a living presence
and made
of reported
for manipulation
by
earnings
trou
It is especially
decisions.
of operating
to
seem to lack sensitivity
that all groups
nities
institute
could
and workshops.
could be revised
our
education,
for accounting
accounting
has
practitioners.
tioners need
and
nizations
and
sensitivity
p. 59).
addition
research
on
seminars
conduct
441
Management
of Earnings
Andersen
and Arthur
Association
Accounting
and Co.
Acceptability
and
satisfaction
high
professional
of
retention
ideals.
Acknowledgement
The
to arrange
of
persons
authors
insightful
refinement
organizations
professional
so that
and practices
their policies
are supported
and encouraged
decency
ordinary
For example,
to act in an ethical manner.
orga
Research
University
greatly
assistance
appreciate
in the
the extensive
and
and
development
this paper of Tom Ferratt, Faculty
for the School of Business,
Coordinator
of Dayton.
of
Appendix
For
management
earnings
Dependent
each
mark
question,
assessment
of the ethical
questions
in pencil
the letter on
nature
of the action,
the General
as supervisor
division.
|
Ethical;
performance
tenance)
Expected
i 2. The
make
000._
Serious;
E = Totally
Unethical
to be painted
in 1992. But
since profit
to
done
in 1991.
decided
have the work
two questions.
to the following
The GM
ordered
division
employees
applies
all discretionary
travel, advertising,
hiring, mainemployee
(e.g., postpone
expenditures
so the division
its budgeted
could make
into the next accounting
profit targets.
period,
amount
expenditures
quarter
3. The
|
Moderate;
information
to defer
first
was
scheduled
building
headquarters
was way ahead of budget
in 1991, the GM
Amount: $150
This
division's
1. The
B = Questionable;
of deferrals:
were
$150
postponed
000.
from
February
and March
until April
in order
to make
the
target.
were
expenditures
the annual target.
postponed
from November
and December
until
January
in order
to
442
M.
4. On
December
on December
be
expenses
needed.
for
information
division
would
5. The
GM
the
remainder
policy
GM
learned what
not
department
the fiscal
of
manual
company's
accounting
when
delivered.
The
as an expense
asked the accounting
This
Rosenzweig
incurred
The
and K.
Fischer
to record
to the following
applies
need
strong performance
were
supplies
are
supplies
and to correct
6. The
had happened,
until February.
a sales program
to implement
liberal payment
offering
occur
next
current
into
the
year
year; customers
normally
to
not
would
the
invoice
for
have
120
pay
quarter
days.
7. The
sold
GM
This
the GM
realized
GM
some
ordered
assets
the division
for a major
$60 000.
expense)
Amount:
excess
and
overtime
realized
in December
terms
trade
show
to be held
accepting
some
in
delivery
so that everything
At
the beginning
targets for
profit
some
to prepay
in March,
controller
to pull
the
possible
of $40 000.
profit
to the following
two questions.
applies
the division would
exceed
its budgeted
information
8. The
to work
manufacturing
the
end
the
of
year.
by
ordered
shipped
the mistake,
In September,
three questions.
the GM
realized
to reach its budget
in the fourth quarter
targets.
decided
GM
be
could
urgently
recorded
invoice
the
not
to be
1992
of December
1991,
the year.
exhibit
rooms,
expenses
(e.g. hotel
and to book
them as 1991 expenses.
to write
down
the inventory
due to obsolescence
(i.e.,
a corresponding
loss in the income
statement).
By
taking a
was able to identify
the controller
view of future market
$700 000 worth
prospects,
pessimistic
even
of finished
that
conservative
would
the
off
say should be written
goods
accounting
though
GM was fairly confident
still be sold at a later date at close to full price.
the inventory would
9. The
This
of
ordered
GM
controller
the division
reduce
and
record
to the following
two questions.
The next year,
a
some interest
customer
and
had
indicated
inventory,
information
applies
the written-off
the division
in buying
to write
the division
the following
controller
year. The GM ordered
inventory
a
to
cost.
in the inventory
full
This
would
involve
000
increase
back
$210
up
tory
a corresponding
to
written
down
due
and
had
been
obsolescence)
(which
previously
net income. The GM's motivation
for recapturing
the profit was:
that
been
This
budgeted
information
straining
division
work
due
delayed
11. To make
to meet
and asked
done
on some
working
to budget
constraints.
to continue
10. To be able
have
profit
applies
product
projects
development
rest of
the
inven
asset value
in
increase
that might
targets.
to the following
The GM
called
budget.
that the firm
but not
important
sold 70%
the
not
send
two questions.
the consulting
an invoice
until
In November,
firm
next
1991,
that was
the division
was
some work
for the
doing
firm
Estimated
The
year.
agreed.
invoiced:
Ethical
Acceptability
of Earnings
Notes
1
is empirical
support for the efficacy
and particularly
liberal arts education
There
education
in making
abilities
increasing cognitive
ments.
See Rest
(1986),
of
in
moral
judg
and Glazer
and Ponemon
(1990).
for
income
come
and Wilson
alternative
of
test
in
income-reducing
be unusually
income
accruals
they choose
increasing
to be low. Bonus
income is expected
related
that managers
will
earnings management
predicts
high
when
income would
and
related. With
choose
managers
smoothing,
accruals when
(forth
management:
earnings
bonus
and
smoothing
discuss
(1988)
forms
(1988),
otherwise
and
choose
accruals
income-decreasing
earn
whenever
evidence
earnings
Trueman
rationale
in their
management'but
and Titman
for
smoothing
study
not
for
income
bonus
related
smoothing.
Managers
interest
This
rates
are
lowered).
is consistent
with
Bruns
and
use
Merchants'
of
the
it is
term, although
(1990)
never explicitly
in their study. Our defini
defined
tion
is consistent
with
the definition
in
given
Merchant
Rockness
and
(forthcoming).
5
See Griffiths, Creative Accounting (1986), a highly
readable account of market pressures to engage
in
definition
creative accounting
techniques,
earnings
including
It includes a description
of the effects
management.
on users of financial informa
of creative accounting
tion and the general public (1986, pp. 5, 11-13).
6
In "Virtues and Business Ethics," Desjardins
(1990)
of the ambiguities
inherent
gives a clear explanation
in ethical
decision-making.
He
argues
that because
in
engaging
can
understand
in earnings
engage
management.
earnings
on
pressures
accountants
as one
management
to
manifestation
of "the professional's
dilemma." Members
of profes
sions are noted for their loyalty to the professional
standards of their disciplines.
These
standards relate
both to the knowledge
base of the professional's dis
cipline and ethical standards with respect to the per
of services for clients. Often
formance
there is a
conflict
between
those professional
standards and the
on
the
placed
by bureaucratic
professional
Decisions
which
advance
the interests
organizations.
of the organization,
such as profit maximization,
may
demands
be
to
contrary
distorted
reports.
earnings
un
requiring
Sorensen
example,
standards
accounting
For
examines
and bureaucratic
conflicting
professional
of accountants working
orientations
in large public
firms
and
finds
that
dissonance
between
accounting
accountants'
the
expectations
and
their
actual
work
(1986).
10
See Loeb
smooth
443
Management
teach
ethics
11
(1988)
to
for a discussion
of how
best
to
students.
accounting
and Rockness
Langenderfer
(1989) discuss the
of
ethics
the accounting
into
importance
integrating
curriculum
and offer a method
for doing so. For an
assessment of the strengths and weaknesses
of this
see Armstrong
method,
(1990).
12
See Hill, et al. (1992) for a discussion of what needs
to be done to make an ethics code a
living presence.
13
For discussions of how ethical considerations
can
be
integrated
into
an
organizations's
structure,
and Mathews
Goodpaster
(1982), Hoffman
Buchholz
and
(1989),
(1988).
Murphy
see
(1980),
References
American
on
Association
Committee
Accounting
Future Structure,
and Scope of
Content,
Education:
1986, 'Future Accounting
Accounting
the
444M.
Fischer
and K.
Pro
for the Expanding
Preparing
Issues inAccounting Education, pp. 168-195.
M. B.: 1990,
'Professional Ethics
and
Armstrong,
A
Education:
of
the
Accounting
Critique
8-Step
Education:
fession',
Method',
181-191.
Bruns, W.
Business
and K.
9,
A. Merchant:
'The
1990,
of
Morality
Dangerous
Managing
Earnings',
Management Accounting (Aug.), 22-25.
R. A.: 1989, Fundamental Concepts and
Buchholz,
Problems in Business Ethics (Prentice-Hall,
Engle
wood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 115-139.
1990, 'Virtues and
J. R. andj. J. McCall:
Desjardins,
Issues in Business
Business
Ethics', Contemporary
J.
Jackson, London).
and D. R. Dalton:
1992,
Hill, J.W., M. B. Metzger
Is
Your
'How Ethical
Management
Company?'
Accounting (July), 59-61.
for
W. M.:
'What is Necessary
1986,
Hoffman,
Business
Moral
Excellence?'
Journal of
Corporate
Ethics 5, 233-242.
Accountants:
Institute
of Management
1983,
for Management
'Standards of Ethical Conduct
SMA1C
Accountants',
(Montvale, NJ).
Import
During
Jones, J.: 1991, 'Earnings Management
Relief
Investigations', Journal ofAccounting Research
26, 193-228.
1989, 'Inte
Langenderfer, H. Q. and J.W. Rockness:
into
Curriculum:
Ethics
the
Accounting
grating
Issues, Problems, and Solutions', Issues inAccounting
Education 4, 58-69.
Loeb, S. E.: 1988, 'Teaching Students Accounting
Ethics: Some Crucial
Issues', Issues in Accounting
Education 3, 316-329.
'A Dialectic
of
N. B.: (forthcoming),
Macintosh,
Rosenzweig
Control
Perspective
of Profit
1-40.
(supplement),
R. andW. Nichols:
Mendenhall
Differential Market Reactions
of
Versus
Earlier-Quarters
Earn
K. A. and J. Rockness:
Merchant,
(forthcoming),
'The Ethics of Managing
Earnings: An Empirical
Investigation', Journal ofAccounting and Public Policy.
Business Ethics',
Murphy, P. E.: 1988, 'Implementing
Business
Ethics
907-915.
7,
Journal of
Pastin, M.:
1986, The Hard Problems ofManagement:
Gaining theEthics Edge (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
L. and A. Glazer:
1990,
Ponemon,
'Accounting
Influ
The
and Ethical Development:
Education
ence of Liberal Learning on Students and Alumni
in Accounting
in Accounting
Issues
Practice',
Education (Fall), 195-208.
on Fraudulent
Commission
Report
of the National
1987.
Financial Reporting, October,
Rest, J.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances inResearch
and Theory (Praeger, New York).
1985, In Good
Solomon, R. C. and K. R. Hanson:
Business
Sorensen,
(Atheneum,
J. E.:
1967,
NY).
'Professional
and
Bureaucratic
of Philosophy,
of Dayton,
U.S.A.