CEFALO study
This was a case-control study conducted during 2004-2008 in Denmark, Norway,
Sweden, and Switzerland. The aim of the study was to assess the possible
association between the use of mobile phones by children and the risk of
developing brain tumors during childhood. In this study, 352 children (aged 7-19)
diagnosed with brain tumors were interviewed. At the same time, 646 healthy
children (unaffected with brain tumors) of the same ages and in the same localities
were interviewed. The children were asked about the way they used their phones
(how long they had the phone, the number and duration of conversations, the side
of the head they usually held the phone close to, and whether they used a handsfree device). In some cases, wherever possible, the researchers compared the
children's reports on their patterns of use with usage data obtained from the mobile
phone companies on the same users.
The results showed that about half of the children spoke on the phone at least once
a week these were labelled 'users'. The sample of children who had the phone for
more than 5 years and had accumulated 144 hours of use or more, and/or
accumulated 2638 conversations or more, was only about 13%. The risk ratio for
developing brain tumors was calculated by the researchers based on the usage
patterns, and after standardization for other risk factors known to be related to the
development of brain tumors (reported X-ray exposure, infectious diseases or head
injuries in the past). These results revealed a 36% increase in the risk of developing
brain tumors among children who used the phone at least once a week over a 6month period. This increased risk was not statistically significant (95% confidence
interval 0.92-2.02). Similarly, no increased risk of developing this disease was
observed even after long-term use (more than 5 years), nor was there an increased
risk for those parts of the brain absorbing the highest doses of radiation.
In the article reporting the above results, the researchers concluded: "The absence
of an exposure-response relationship either in terms of the amount of mobile phone
use or by localization of the brain tumor argues against a causal association."
It is interesting to note, on closer perusal of the results reported in the article, that
in a subanalysis, which included objective usage data obtained from the mobile
phone companies (as distinct from the self-reporting based on the children's recall),
it was found that the risk of developing brain tumors about three years after the
start of use was twice as high as in children not classed as 'users'. This result was
statistically significant (95% confidence interval 1.07-4.29).
The absence of statistical significance may reflect a situation where the use of
mobile phones by children is unrelated to the risk of developing brain tumors in
childhood. Alternatively, it may also be due to a small sample size. Indeed, the
study was based on a relatively small number of children (998 altogether) and on a
short follow-up period. It is also important to note that the extent of mobile phone
use described in this study was relatively low compared to use patterns today,
especially in Israel. Even children classed as 'heaviest' users in the study had
spoken for a mere total of 144 accumulated hours, or conducted a total of only 2638
conversations since they started using the phone.
In addition to the study described above, the CEFALO researchers also conducted
an ecological study, in which they investigated the rate of brain and central nervous
system tumors in children aged 5-19 during the years 1990-2009. They
hypothesized that the sharp increase in the use of mobile phones during those
years would be expressed in a parallel increase in morbidity. Morbidity data on
brain tumors were obtained from the Scandinavian Cancer Registry (a database
recording all cases of cancer in Scandinavian countries ). The data on the use of
mobile phones were obtained from the questionnaires used for children in the casecontrol CEFALO study, as well as from usage data obtained from mobile phone
companies in Sweden.
The researchers' hypothesis was not validated; despite the increased use of mobile
phones, there was no increase in the incidence of brain tumors during those years.
Similar ecological studies conducted in the USA and Scandinavian countries
(Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) confirmed that the rate of brain tumors in
children and adolescents remained unchanged during those years.
It should be mentioned again that during the years 1990-2009 the use of mobile
phones among children was still relatively low. In addition, ecological studies
provide less reliable scientific evidence than case-control or cohort studies (to learn
more see the section on Research Methodology Population studies).
Today's children are expected to continue to use radiofrequency radiationemitting devices throughout their lives, thus accumulating long durations of
exposure.
Children are not expected to make decisions for themselves on critical topics,
as long as they are the responsibility of adults.
Sources
Aydin D, Feychting M, Schz J, Tynes T, Andersen TV, Schmidt LS, Poulsen AH,
Johansen C, Prochazka M, Lannering B, Klboe L, Eggen T, Jenni D, Grotzer M,
Von der Weid N, Kuehni CE, Rsli M. Mobile phone use and brain tumors in
children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst.
2011; 103:1264-1276
Boice JD Jr, Tarone RE. Cell phones, cancer, and children. J Natl Cancer Inst.
2011; 103:1211-123.
Schmidt
LS, Schmiegelow
K, Lahteenmaki
P, Trger
C, Stokland
T, Grell
K, Gustafson
G, Sehested
A, Raashou-Nielsen
O, Johansen
C, Schz
J Incidence of childhood central nervous system tumors in the Nordic
countries. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Jan;56(1):65-9.
Ministry of Health, National Center for Disease Control. Health in Israel 2010.
Publication 333, August 2011 (Hebrew).