Also these results cannot be generalized and its usefulness will be limited.
When the number of these variables are combined to form a dimensionless
group like (u D /) few experiments will be sufficient to obtain useful
information. This parameter can be varied by varying one of the variables
which will be the easier one to vary, for example velocity u. The results will
be applicable for various combinations of these parameters and so the
results can be generalized and extended to new situations. The
results will be applicable also for different fluids and different diameters
provided the value of the group remains the same. Lets look at a situation
The drag force F on a stationary sphere in flow is found to depend on
diameter D, velocity u, fluid density and viscosity . Assuming that to
study the influence of a parameter, 10 experimental points are necessary, to
estimate the total experimental points needed to obtain complete
information. We need to see how this could be reduced.
To obtain a curve of F vs u, for fixed values of , and D, experiments
needed are estimated to be 10.
To study the effect of these 10 experiments should be repeated 10 times
with 10 values of the total now being 102.
The 102 experiments have to repeated 10 times each for different values of .
Total experiments for u, and = 103.
To study the effect of variation of diameter all the experiments have to be
repeated 10 times each.
Hence total experiments required = 104.
We can however combine these parameters to obtain two dimensionless
parameters. These parameters could be
uD
F
u 2D 2
uD
F
u 2D 2
Experiments can be conducted for obtaining this information by varying the
parameter (uD/)and determining the values for F/u2D2.
Note : It will be almost impossible to find fluids with 10 different densities
and 10 different viscosities.
This illustrates the advantage dimensional analysis has in experiment
planning. The use of the results of dimensional analysis is the basis for
similitude and modeling studies.
1, 2 F a b D c d u e
The values of a, b, c, d, and e are obtained by comparing the dimensions on
both sides the dimensions on the L.H.S. being zero as terms are
dimensionless. This is also tedious and considerable expertise is needed to
form these groups as the number of unknowns will be more than the number
of available equations. This method is also called indicial method.
f ( q 1 , q 2 , q 3 ,.....) 0
then the n parameters can be grouped into n m independent
dimensionless ratios or parameters, expressed in the form
g(1, 2,3,..........nm ) 0
and 1 g1(2,3,.......... nm )
where m is the number of dimensions required to specify the dimensions of
all the parameters,q1, q2, .... qn. It is also possible to form new dimensionless
parameters as a discrete function of the (n m) parameters. For example
if there are four dimensionless parameters 1, 2, 3and 4 it is possible
to obtain 5, 6 etc. as
1
10.5
5
or 6 0.667
3 4
2
The limitation of this exercise is that the exact functional relationship
cannot be obtained from the analysis. The functional relationship is
generally arrived at through the use of experimental results
Determination of Groups
Irrespective of the method used the following steps will systematize the
procedure.
Step 1. List all the parameters that influence the phenomenon concerned.
This has to be very carefully done. If some parameters are left out, terms
may be formed but experiments then will indicate these as inadequate to
describe the phenomenon. If unsure the parameter can be added. Later
experiments will show that the term with the doubtful parameters as
useful or otherwise. Hence a careful choice of the parameters will help in
solving the problem with least effort.
Usually three type of parameters may be identified in fluid flow namely fluid
properties, geometry and flow parameters like velocity and pressure.
Step 2. Select a set of primary dimensions, (mass, length and time), (force,
length and time), (mass, length, time and temperature) are some of the sets
used popularly.
The primary dimensions are specified as
Mass = M in kg
Length = L in meters
Time = T in sec
Temperature = in C or K
Step 3. List the dimensions of all parameters in terms of the chosen set of
primary dimensions.
Force = kg m/sec2 =ML/T2
Area = m2 = L2
Volume = m3 = L3
Volume Flow rate = m3/sec = L3/T
Mass flow rate = kg/sec = M/T
Velocity = m/sec = L/T
Angular Velocity = Radians/sec = 1/T
5
a. Diameter d in m.
d. RPM N in 1/s.
2 =a2ub2dc2N
2 =a3ub3dc3
For 1 a1ub1dc1F
a1
b1
c1 ML
M L
M LT 3 L 2
L T
T
0 0
we have
0 0
M0LT
M1a1 L3a1b1c11 T b12 or
For M
0 1 a1 which gives a1 1,
For T
0 b1 2 gives b1 2
For L
0 3a1 b1 c1 1 gives c 2
F
and so 1 2 2
u d
Groups;
1 =a1ub1dc1F
Fo r
2 =a2ub2dc2N
2 =a3ub3dc3
2 a 2 u b2 d c 2 N
0
w e h a ve
M LT
M 0 L0T 0 M a1
M
3
L
3 a 2 b2 c 2
a2
L
T
b2 1
b2
c2 1
L
T
or
Fo r M
0 a2
Fo r T
0 b 2 1 g ive s b 2 1
Fo r L
0 3 a 2 b 2 c 2 g ive s c 2 1
a n d so 2
1 =a1ub1dc1F
Nd
u
2 =a2ub2dc2N
2 =a3ub3dc3
For 3 a3 u b3 d c3
a
3
M
L
M 0 L0T 0 3
L T
we have
b3
c3
LT
M 0L0T 0 M a3 1 L3 a3 b3 c3 1 T b3 1 or
For M
0 a3 1
For T
0 b3 1 gives b3 1
For L
0 3a3 b3 c3 1 gives c3 1
and so 3
gives a3 1
ud
Nd
F
f
,
2 2
u d
u
ud
10
Common groups
11
12
Similarity
The underlying concept of dimensional analysisthe principle of similarity.
There are three necessary conditions for complete similarity between a
model and a prototype.
The first condition is geometric similaritythe model must be the same
shape as the prototype, but may be scaled by some constant scale factor.
Geometric similarity exists between model and prototype if the ratio of all
corresponding dimensions in the model and prototype are equal
LModel
L
m L where L is the scale factor
LPr ototype LP
AModel
L2m
2 2L where A is the scale factor
APr ototype L P
All corresponding angles are to be the same.
The second condition is kinematic similarity, which means that the velocity
at any point in the model flow must be proportional (by a constant scale
factor) to the velocity at the corresponding point in the prototype flow as
shown below
13
L
V e lo c it y
V
V
LP
L
am
aP
A c c e le r a t io n
Q
D is c h a r g e
Q
T
LP
T
L3 m
m
L
=u
T
L3P
14
2
m
2
L
=
2T
3L
= Q
T
You may recall that streamlines are kinematic phenomena; hence, the
streamline pattern in the model flow is a geometrically scaled copy of that in
the prototype flow when kinematic similarity is achieved.
F o rc e
R a t io
Fm
FP
m
P
a
a
m
P
2
L
m L3 m
L
X
P L3P
2T
L
2
L
2
u
Models
When a structure is build it undergoes some analysis in the design stage.
Often the structures are too complex for simple mathematical analysis and a
model is build. Usually the model is less than full size but it may be greater.
The real structure is known as the prototype. The model is usually
built to an exact geometric scale of the prototype but in some cases -notably
river model - this is not possible. Measurements can be taken from the
model and a suitable scaling law applied to predict the values in the
prototype.
15
To illustrate how these scaling laws can be obtained we will use the
relationship for resistance of a body moving through a fluid.
The resistance, R, is dependent on the following physical properties:
M
L
M
, u
, l L,
3
L
T
LT
s o f (R , ,u , l, ) 0 m 5, n 3
W e c a n h a v e 2 g ro u p s
For
we
M
a1
have
L 0T
l c1 R
L 0T
a1 1
b1
M
3
L
3 a1 b1 c 1 1
a1
L
T
b1
b1 2
For M
0 a2 1
For
0 b1 2
For
0 3 a 1 b 1 c 1 1 g iv e s
and
so
For
we
M
a2
have
L 0T
R
u 2l
g iv e s
L T
a2 1
M
3
L
0 a2 1
For
0 b 2 1 g iv e s
For
0 3a2 b2 c
and
so
W e c a ll 1 /
b2 2
a2
3 a2 b2 c 2 1
For M
or
c1 2
l c2
M L
T
so a2 1
b2
c1
L
T
b2
b2 2
c2
M
LT
or
so a2 1
1/
ul
2a
16
b2 1
1 g iv e s
c2 1
R e y n o ld s N o
f
or
R
u
l
)
f
u 2 l 2
or
2 2
2 2
mum lm
PuP lP
m
P
mumlm
Rm
f
2 2
u l
m
or m m m
RP
P uP lP
f
PuP 2lP 2
P
At this point we can go no further unless we make
some assumptions.
We assume bith model and Prototype have same
muml m PuP lP
Reynolds No
m
P
Rm mum2lm2
so now
RP P uP 2lP 2
Which gives the scaling law as R 2u 2l
17
mumlm PuP lP
or
and we get
m
P
um P m lP
or u
uP m P lm
l
If we subsitute it in the scaling law for Resistance
R 2u 2l
we get
R (
( )2
( )2
2
)
l
2
2
( ) (l )
( )2
uP m P lm
In such a case both model and prototype are
Dynamically Similiar.
5.11.1 Dynamically similar model examples
18
F o r D y n a m ic S im ila r it y R e
Re
or
ud
ud
m
s o m o d e l v e lo c ity = u m u P
F o r m o d e l a n d P ro to ty p e
so
uP
P dP m
m dm P
P,P
dP
1
10
200m / s.
dm
1 / 20
Note that this is a very high velocity. This is one reason why model tests are
not always done at exactly equal Reynolds numbers. Some relaxation of the
equivalence requirement is often acceptable when the Reynolds number is
high. Using a wind tunnel may have been possible in this example. If this
were the case then the appropriate values of the and ratios need to be
used in the above equation.
19
ul
D rag ( u 2 l 2 )f
( u 2 l 2 )f R e l
For dynam ic sim ilarity R e m R e P
ul
m
T he value
ul
P lP m
or
u
u
m
P
m lm P
P
of does not change m uch w ith P ressure
m
P
m
P
PP
Pm 20 PP
20 PP
m so m 20 P
PP
P
P lP
1 1
500
1 / 10 250 km / hr
m lm
20
Dm
( u 2 l 2 )m
T he ratio of forces is given by
DP
( u 2 l 2 )P
um uP
Dm
20 0.5 .1
or
1 1 0.05
DP
1
D P 6 750 N
20