Modelling Tumour-Induced
Angiogenesis
H.A. Levine and B.D. Sleeman
Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University (U.S.A)
School of Mathematics, University of Leeds (U.K.)
6.1 Abstract
6.2 Introduction
6.3 Biochemical Kinetics
6.4 Reinforced Random Walks and Cell Movement
6.5 Numerical Experiments
6.6 Antiangiogenesis Models
6.6.1 The Geometry of the Problem
6.6.2 The Biochemistry of Angiogenesis and Its Inhibition
6.6.3 Mechanism for the Production of Protease Inhibitors
6.6.4 Mechanism for the Degradation of Fibronectin
6.7 Equations of Mass Action
6.8 Chemical Transport in the Capillary and in the ECM
6.8.1 Chemical Transport in the Capillary
6.8.2 Chemical Transport in the ECM
6.9 Cell Movement
6.9.1 Cell Movement in the Capillary
6.9.2 Cell Movement in the ECM
6.10 Transmission, Boundary, and Initial Conditions
6.10.1 Transmission Conditions
6.10.2 Boundary Conditions
6.10.3 Initial Conditions
6.1
Abstract
nonlinear ordinary and partial differential equations modelling the initiation of tumour angiogenesis. We then develop the ideas further in order to model endothelial
cell migration and proliferation into the extra-cellular matrix leading to angiogenesis. The main focus here is to model possible antiangiogenic strategies. The final
part of the chapter discusses various methods of mathematical analysis which underpin and provide a deeper understanding of the qualitative properties of angiogenesis
models. Mathematical modelling of angiogenesis has been discussed by a number of
authors (Balding and McElwain [1], Orme and Chaplain [15], Sleeman [20], Chaplain and Anderson [4], Sherrat et al. [19]). These works have been mainly devoted to
modelling the macroscopic events of endothelial cell evolution and migration characteristics within the ECM. The modelling ideas are based on the principles of mass
conservation and chemical kinetics. While there are some formal similarities with
the modelling strategies developed in this chapter there are several significant differences.
In the excellent review paper [2] Bellomo and Preziosi provide a survey of the
mathematical models and methods associated with the analysis and simulation of
tumour dynamic interaction with the immune system. The aim is to develop a general framework for the expression of immuno-mathematical theories and to develop
research strategies.
6.2
Introduction
and extended cells inside capillaries. The surface of the capillaries is covered with
a collagenous network intermingled with laminin. This is called the basal lamina
(BL). This layer is continuous and serves as a scaffold (or exocytoskeleton) upon
which the EC rest. The BL is mainly formed by the EC while layers of EC and BL
are sheathed by fibroblasts and possibly smooth muscle cells. In response to one
or more angiogenic stimuli (we concentrate on VEGF) the EC in nearby capillaries appear to thicken and produce proteolytic enzymes (es) which in turn degrade
the BL. In further response to the angiogenic factor, the cell surface begins to develop pseudo-podia that penetrate the weakened BL into the extra cellular matrix
(ECM). The EC subsequently begin to accumulate in regions where the concentration of VEGF reaches a threshold value. The vessel dilates as the EC aggregate and
the proteases degrade the BL and the ECM, thus allowing the EC to migrate and
grow toward the VEGF source by chemotaxis. The EC proliferate as they move and
other cells (e.g., pericytes) move towards the migrating EC to initiate the building of
a primitive BL. In this way capillary sprouts are formed.
6.3
Biochemical Kinetics
In order to better understand how the angiogenic factor acts on the ECs we consider that each cell has a certain number of receptors to which the angiogenic factors
(ligands) bind. The receptor-ligand complexes (intermediates) in turn stimulate the
cell to produce proteolytic enzymes and form new receptors. We propose to model
this process in the following manner: If denotes a molecule (dimer) of angiogenic
factor and denotes some receptor (also a dimer) on the endothelial cell surface to
which it binds, the activated complex so formed, , signals a cascade of intracellular signalling events which results in the transcription of RNAs which in turn are
translated by the ribosomes into proteolytic enzyme, . The receptor complex
is subsequently invaginated into the cell cytoplasm from the cell surface where it is
degraded. In the cell nucleus, the cell signal cascade activated by the receptor activate transcription factors which leads to the translation of a new receptor which
then moves to the cell surface. The proteolytic enzyme degrades the basal laminar
wall leaving a product by acting as a catalyst for fibronectin degradation. We use
classical Michaelis-Menten kinetics for this standard catalytic reaction. In symbols
(6.1)
The point of view adopted here is that the receptor dimers at the surface of the
cell function the same way an enzyme functions in classical enzymatic catalysis.
This is a first step in modelling a much more complicated process. It is known that
an endothelial cell will produce, in response to a single molecule of growth factor,
several, say, molecules of protease. The number will in general be quite large
and will depend on the concentrations of growth factor the cell encounters at its cell
surface [18]. This means that the mechanism (6.1) should strictly be modified to read
Here is an overall molecular resource term which reflects the resources used in the
translation of protein from the messenger
.
That is, a single molecule of growth factor, by binding to an EC receptor, initiates a cascade of signalling and amplification events involving -proteins, transcription factors, and DNA which lead to the synthesis of several molecules of protease
and a receptor cell of the initial type. Once this cascade has been initiated, the growth
factor is rendered inert along a second pathway. The sequence of kinetic events is
very long and the rate constants for each step are not known.
The overall mechanism is known as the Map-kinase signalling cascade. The
precise details have been recorded in the appendix to [12].
Let denote position along the capillary vessel wall and
denote time. With
concentrations expressed in micro moles per litre, we define the following quantities:
= concentration of angiogenic factor .
= concentration of proteolytic enzyme .
= density of receptors on the cell directed into the basement lamina.
= concentration of intermediate receptor complex .
= concentration of endothelial cells.
= concentration of fibronectin.
Applying the law of mass action to the first two equations in (6.1) we obtain
(6.2)
(6.3)
(6.4)
(6.5)
The upshot of the remarks above concerning the Map-kinase signalling cascade
would result in Equation (6.5) being replaced by
where now the constant includes a resource factor involving the concentration
which is assumed to be in excess so that its time variation may be neglected. We
take for illustrative purposes. Applying standard Michaelis-Menten kinetics
to the third and fourth equations in (6.1) there results
(6.6)
where = and . The rate equations for protease and fibronectin are
not complete as they stand. For example, it is known that protease decays at a rate
proportional to its concentration. It is also known that the ECs produce fibronectin.
To account for these we modify Equations (6.5) and (6.6) to
(6.7)
(6.8)
6.4
(6.9)
(6.10)
(6.11)
That is,
will be augmented by cells moving from the positions to
and diminished by cells moving from to either or . The quantity
is the mean waiting time at site . It is convenient to think of
this conditional probability density as the density of endothelial cells. The transition
probability rates depend on the control substances we have denoted by
and are defined on the lattice at step size. For our modelling will include the
proteolytic enzyme and fibronectin . Now suppose that the decision of when to
move is independent of the decision where to move. Then the mean waiting time
across the lattice is constant. Hence the transitions must be suitably scaled and
normalised so that
(6.12)
only at the
(6.13)
(6.14)
We now proceed to the continuous limit using Taylors expansion and by letting
in such a way that
and
(6.15)
(6.16)
where
now denotes endothelial cell density and = = . To
complete the model we need to impose appropriate initial and boundary conditions.
These are
(6.17)
(6.18)
(6.19)
These factors are chosen in order to provide a measure of how responsive ECs
are to protease and to fibronectin. It is known that proteases stimulate the movement
of endothelial cells. Here we choose
(6.20)
where
and . The idea here is that ECs move
in response to fibronectin degradation by moving to lower levels of concentration
and in response to protease by moving to higher levels of concentration. That is,
the greater the degree of protease production the greater the degree of fibronectin
degradation. It is this mechanism that allows for the breakdown of the capillary wall.
Choosing as a rational function of and is to avoid singularities in the
coefficients of which would otherwise arise in Equation (6.16) when and
are small. Other choices for these factors which avoid this and still preserve the
qualitative properties above are given in [12].
6.5
Numerical Experiments
In the numerical computations we choose
!" #
(6.21)
where , , and $ are positive constants. The constant is chosen so that
%
(EC movement)
(EC movement)
(VEGF kinetics)
(enzyme kinetics)
(fibronectin)
6.6
Antiangiogenesis Models
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.8
0.6
time (hours)
Figure 6.1
2.5
1.5
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.5
0.05
0
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0 time (hours)
0.2
0.1
Figure 6.2
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1
0.8
0.2
0.6
0.15
0.4
0.1
0.2
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.4
0.05
0
time (hours)
6.6.1
Throughout we shall use Figure 6.5 as a basis for the modelling process.
Tumor colony
y= l
Extracellular Matrix
(ECM)
y=0
Basement Lamina
x=0
Capillary
(BL)
x=L
Figure 6.5
6.6.2
6.6.3
(6.22)
(6.23)
There are several ways in which angiostatic agents might inhibit angiogenesis [14]. Here we restrict attention to two such mechanisms:
(1) Angiostatin as a direct inhibitor of protease [22]
(6.24)
(6.25)
where is the equilibrium constant for this step and
(6.26)
.
(6.27)
*
(6.28)
*
(6.29)
Here
is a receptor protein on the EC,
is the intermediate complex
and * is a protease inhibitor produced by the ECs in response to the angiostatic
agent by an overall mechanism which we assume to be of Michaelis-Menten
type. denotes the proteolytic enzyme molecules that are inhibited by *
from functioning as a catalyst for fibronectin degradation. Assuming the step
(6.27) to be in equilibrium we have
*
6.6.4
(6.31)
(6.32)
6.7
(6.30)
When angiostatin acts directly as an inhibitor, the last four equations (6.37) to (6.40)
may be deleted.
The enzyme kinetics for fibronectin decay leads to three additional ordinary
differential equations.
It is reasonable to assume that the kinetics for degradation of fibronectin by
protease is of Michaelis-Menten type. The treble then reduces to the form
(6.41)
conservation laws,
the idea of pseudo steady states [13], and
inner and outer singular perturbations.
For a full discussion of these arguments we refer to [11]. These ideas used in
conjunction with the following conservation equation for protease and the equilibrium equation of active protease
*
leads to the set
*
+
+
+
+
(6.42)
(6.43)
(6.44)
(6.45)
(6.46)
6.8
inhibited enzyme
,
protease inhibitor *
fibronectin
-
angiostatin
EC density
angiogenic factor
6.8.1
In the ECM
'
'
'
*
'
'
'
'
'
.
-
-
-
,
- ,
.
-
,
(6.47)
(6.48)
(6.49)
(6.50)
(6.51)
(6.52)
(6.53)
(6.54)
(6.55)
.
-
-
.
,
6.8.2
(6.56)
(6.57)
(6.58)
(6.59)
Here we set down the model equations governing cell transport in the ECM. We
follow this with an important commentary.
(i) Angiostatin stimulates EC to produce inhibitor
'
/ '
.
-
'
*
*
.
*
(6.60)
(6.61)
(6.62)
(6.63)
(6.64)
(6.65)
(6.66)
'
/ '
.
'
-
.
*
*
.
(6.67)
(6.68)
(6.69)
(6.70)
(6.71)
(6.72)
(6.73)
Remarks
(1) We assume that background fibronectin production is in much greater excess
than that of the EC. So the logistic term is independent of .
(2) We assume the ECM is a porous medium.
(3) We allow for the inhomogeneous diffusion of growth factor and for angiostatin.
(4) We need to account for the diffusion of fibronectin in the ECM.
Generally diffusion is based on Ficks law which states that the flux of particles
is proportional to the gradient of concentration. The assumption being that the surrounding medium is homogeneous, the local concentration of the diffusing particle is
small, and the particles themselves are small. Fibronectin is a high molecular weight
protein in a highly heterogeneous region which is held in the ECM by noncovalent
linkages with other proteins. To model this we use diffusion by mean curvature
(see [8]).
6.9
Cell Movement
6.9.1
where
6.9.2
and
.
(6.74)
(6.75)
.
01 2
3
(6.76)
We take the transition rate function . to be of the same form (although with
different parameters) as .
01 is a curvature sensitivity factor.
3
is a switch.
The second term on the right hand side of 6.76 is composed of a logistic growth
term together with a term which represents growth in response to active protease.
6.10
6.10.1
Transmission Conditions
4
-
3
.
(6.77)
(6.78)
where
is the rate at which angiostatin is supplied.
5 3
' 5
' 5
-
'
(6.79)
(6.80)
(6.81)
(6.82)
6.10.2
Boundary Conditions
'
'
'
(6.83)
(6.84)
(6.85)
2
'
6
(
(6.86)
# 7
(
6.10.3
Initial Conditions
'
'
6.11
-
'
'
,
'
*
'
Numerical Experiments
Figure 6.6
Our numerical investigations suggest the more efficaciously one can tie up the
protease the more rapidly can one inhibit angiogenesis.
Several antiangiogenesis agents alone or in combination with conventional therapies are now in clinical trials. These trials are based on strategies that
(1) interfere with angiogenic ligands;
(2) upregulate or deliver endogenous inhibitors; or
(3) directly target the vasculature.
However there are a number of potential problems as discussed by Carmeliet
and Jain [3] that warrant caution in clinical trials in humans. anticancer therapy is
currently a subject of considerable controversy. While it offers new hope for the
successful treatment of cancer, a degree of caution is necessary. It is hoped that the
work described here will make a positive contribution to the debate by putting the
possible mechanisms on a quantitative footing.
Figure 6.7
6.12
Mathematical Analysis
We shall be concerned with an investigation of the qualitative properties of solutions to the following problem. Let * be a bounded domain with boundary
. We seek solutions 8 9 * of the system
8
9
8
8
9
(6.87)
8
9
.
where is the inward pointing normal to .
8
(6.88)
Figure 6.8
8 8
9 9
(6.89)
(6.90)
where
is a constant diffusion coefficient, 8 is population density (e.g., endothelial cell density), and 9 is a vector of growth factors, growth inhibitors, fibronectin, protease, etc. The study of the above problem is central to understanding
tumour angiogenesis models and also the processes of aggregation and dispersal of
cells or other organisms. Key references are [9] and [21]. These papers deal almost
exclusively with qualitative properties of the system of Equations (6.88) to (6.90).
Questions of local and global existence are discussed in [23]. To begin with we
consider some remarkable exact solutions for one space dimension systems.
Figure 6.9
Time course for fibronectin degradation in the ECM after introduction of angiostatin.
6.13
Exact Solutions
Consider
8
8
89
9
8 9 9
.
8
8
.
9
8 8
9 9
9 9 -
(6.91)
(6.92)
(6.93)
(6.94)
(6.95)
(6.96)
Without loss of generality we scale and normalise the system of Equations (6.91) to
(6.96) and consider the problem;
8
8
89
9
8 9
.
8
- 99 #
8
8 8
9 9
6.13.1
(6.97)
(6.98)
(6.99)
(6.100)
(6.101)
Method 1
Set
5
(6.102)
5 5 -5 5
or
55 -5 5 5
5 -5 5 #
#
5
9 5
5 8 8
(6.103)
(6.104)
(6.105)
(6.106)
#
(6.107)
ELLIPTIC if
PARABOLIC if
5 -5
(6.108)
5 -5
(6.109)
5 -5
(6.110)
5 : ;
where :
(6.111)
where :
and ; satisfies
; - ; -; ; ;
; -; ; #
; 5 #
; 8
(6.112)
(6.113)
(6.114)
(6.115)
;
where
, , and are parameters to be determined. As an example take
(mixed case), . Then we can show that
8 5 ;
(6.116)
,
(6.117)
where < is an arbitrary parameter, and and satisfy the indicial equation
(6.118)
. <
<
(6.119)
# . . When it exists the series (6.117) can be summed to give
<
8
<
<
(6.120)
which blows up at the single point
. , where and
#. When we take to be the negative root, then the solution will exist
for all
and decay to a spatially homogeneous solution. Now consider the case
when - (the hyperbolic case). The same method leads to the solution
<
8
<
<
<
(6.121)
where . Both roots of this equation have negative real part. This
solution decays exponentially to 8 as
.
For then the series converges absolutely and uniformly on compact sets of
6.13.2
Method 2
5 :
(6.122)
Then
: :
:
Now set
: :
(6.123)
:
;
;
.
)
This idea is due to Yin Yang, Hua Chen, and Weian Liu [23]. After considerable
manipulations it is found that;
(i)
(ii)
. is an exponential function of .
(iii)
8
9
4
4
where ,
, and 4 are arbitrary constants and
We conclude the following:
(a) If
4
4
4
4
4
(6.124)
(6.125)
.
4
4 , then 8 9 exist globally.
(b) If
4
there exists a . such that 8 9 exists on
and blows up in finite time . at some point # .
Note: The solutions obtained here are precisely the same as those obtained in the
first method when - after a shift in the time axis. Case (a) corresponds to taking
the positive root of while case (b) corresponds to the choice of the
negative root. The second type cannot be observed in numerical simulations since
the problem is very unstable and any component of the solution in a direction tangent
to the unstable manifold leads to blow up in finite time.
6.13.3
Method 3
; -; ;
(6.126)
(6.127)
(6.128)
(6.129)
(6.130)
; -; ;
;
; #
= ,
= ,
>
Now write
; = >
; ;
; ; = >
We find that and satisfy
- 2
- 2
where 2 is a separation constant. For 2=0, >
= and we get
2
2
for further arbitrary constants 2 , , and . Set 2 (an integer) then;
8
- -
9
;
(6.131)
(6.132)
(6.133)
(6.134)
(6.135)
(i) If -
(ii)
set is a subset of the solution set obtained in method 1. (These solutions do not
always satisfy the boundary conditions.)
6.14
Aggregation
9 & 99
(6.136)
We argue that the seeds of such shock formation are already present in the
simple hyperbolic case of Equations (6.97) and (6.98) - in the zero-diffusion
limit if , in such a way that - constant. Before doing so, let us see
how Equation (6.87) can be manipulated to exploit the idea of the hodograph plane
further and the forms of above.
One has to understand that the mass transport, i.e., the transport of P is always
along characteristics. For example the solution of ; ; has the form ;
so that the solution is propagated along the characteristic lines
!"
.
We set & , solve the equation 9 8 9 for 8 and set 5
/
9. There results, after a long and somewhat tedious calculation, a single equation
of the form
5 5
9 5 5
(6.137)
where
%
,
9
9
%9
9 and , . The form of
? 9 9
and where
9
here.
9
(6.138)
need not concern us
Figure 6.10
Figure 6.11
Figure 6.12
aggregates toward the centre illustrated by the evolving peak at
. Then the solution 8
is so large at the centre as to cause a change in type so that it begins
to collapse leading to the plateau-like region. It cannot collapse back to a constant
because the caustic regions have since formed and the mass cannot be transported all
the way back to the ends of the interval.
Consider Equation (6.112) with and where we have restored the diffusion
coefficient , i.e.,
Let
-
Set @ ; A
; ;
; ;
A @A @
@ A
(6.139)
(6.140)
(6.141)
A @
(6.142)
Figure 6.13
Figure 6.14
Figure 6.15
where
; ;
(6.143)
and so
A @ A
@ @@ A
(6.144)
(6.145)
@
@@ @
5 5 . We have
(6.146)
@
@ @
; @
(6.147)
6 @
(6.148)
Figure 6.16
Shock formation and aggregation for the Othmer-Stevens systems taken from
SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57, 1044-1081, 1997.
then implicit differentiation leads to
@
@ 6
@ 6 @
(6.149)
Thus if no damping is present shocks in @ will form in positive finite time along
those characteristics which are strictly convex, if and only if @ ;
somewhere or along concave characteristics if @ ;
somewhere. We can
also construct simple wave-type shocks under the scaling <
< [9]. These
are embedded in the travelling waves which we construct below.
6.15
Travelling Waves
@
A
where A
-A -@
@
A
@
A
(6.150)
9 Set
@
;
A
;
(6.151)
;
(6.152)
This system has extremely rich dynamics which are currently under investigation.
Suppose we look for travelling waves of the form
;
;
(6.153)
; -;; ;
-
(6.154)
then
These are Burgers equations which can be integrated to give the solutions ;
where
- B
- B B
-
- with
arbitrary.
;
where
Note that ;
as B
and to
. Similarly
-
-
,
(6.155)
as B
(6.156)
So our problem has solutions which are the sum of two travelling waves. This may
also be used to provide support for the existence of aggregating solutions.
6.16
References
[14] Nelsen, N.J., Inhibitors of angiogenesis enter phase III testing, J. Natl. Cancer
Inst. 90, 960-962, 1998.
[15] Orme, M.E. and Chaplain, M.A.J., Two-dimensional models of tumour angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis strategies, IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 14,
73-98, 1997.
[16] Othmer, H.G. and Stevens, A., Aggregation, blow-up and collapse: the ABCs
of taxis and reinforced random walks, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57, 1044-1081,
1997.
[17] Paweletz, N. and Knierim, M., Tumor-related angiogenesis, Crit. Rev. Oncol.
Hematol. 9, 197-242, 1989.
[18] Ramanujan, S., Koenig, G.C., Padera, T.P., Stoll, B.R., and Jain, R.K., Local
imbalance of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors: a potential mechanism
of focal necrosis and dormancy in tumors, Cancer Res. 60, 1442-1448, 2000.
[19] Sherrat, J.A., Perumpanani, A.J., and Owen, M.R., Pattern formation in cancer, in On Growth and Form: Spatio-Temporal Pattern Formation in Biology,
Wiley, New York, 47-73, 1999.
[20] Sleeman, B.D., Solid tumour growth: a case study in mathematical biology, in
Nonlinear Mathematics and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 237-256, 1996.
[21] Sleeman, B.D. and Levine, H.A., Partial differential equations of chemotaxis
and angiogenesis, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24, 405-426, 2001.
[22] Stack, M.S., Gately, S., Bafetti, L.M., Enghild, J., Soff, J., and Soff, G.A.,
Angiostatin inhibits endothelial and melanoma cellular invasion by blocking
matrix-enhanced plasminogen activation, Biochem. J. 340, 77-84, 1999.
[23] Yang, Y., Chen, H., and Liu, W., On existence of global solutions and blow-up
to a system of reaction-diffussion equations modelling chemotaxis, SIAM J.
Math. Anal. 33, 763-785, 2001.