9
10
) NO.
)
) COMPLAINT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff James Sanchez complains against Defendants ALLYNCE, INC. and RALPH
DUDLEY as follows:
19
1.
This is an action for patent infringement arising under 35 U.S.C. 101 et seq.
20
21
Plaintiff owns exclusive rights in the ornamental designs claimed in United States Patent No.
2.
Defendants and each of them have sold, offered for sale, distributed and used the
24 claimed design of Plaintiffs Patent on license plate frames, without plaintiffs permission.
25
26
THE PARTIES
3.
27
28
30
31
COMPLAINT
1
4.
5.
4
California.
5
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
6
7
6. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States
8 Code. This Court has subject matter over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338.
9
10
11
7. On information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over defendants at least
because each of the defendants continuously and systematically does business in this District,
and also because each of the defendants in engaged in selling, distributing and offering to sell or
12
13
14
15 because Defendant Allynce, Inc. is a corporation and because each of the defendants is
16 committing acts of patent infringement in this District by selling, distributing and offering to sell
17 or distribute items that infringe Plaintiffs Patent.
18
19
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
9. On or about February 28, 2012, Plaintiffs Patent was issued to plaintiff. A true and
20
21
22
23 selling, offering for sale and using a license plate frame (hereafter Defendants design) in
24 commerce in the United States.
25
26
11. To the ordinary observer, the two designs are substantially the same. The designs
are as follows:
27
28
30
31
COMPLAINT
2
1
2
3
4
5
Defendants design
6
7
9
12. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in the
10
11
12
13 sold and distributed license plate frames that infringe Plaintiffs Patent.
14
15
16
14. On or about September 28, 2015, plaintiff notified defendants by letter, demanding
that they cease and desist from such activities. Defendants have failed and refused to comply.
15. In the eye of the ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives,
17
18
19
Defendants design and the designs shown in Plaintiffs Patent are substantially the same, such
that Defendants design would deceive an ordinary observer, inducing him, her or it to purchase
16. As a result of such infringement, plaintiff has been damaged, and defendants have
22 reaped wrongful profits. Moreover, plaintiff has been and will continue to be irreparably harmed
23
24
25
26
of the existence and enforceability of Plaintiffs Patent. Defendants have acted with willful
COMPLAINT
3
WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief:
1. A judgment that defendants, and each of them, have infringed Plaintiffs Patent;
3
4
2. A permanent injunction enjoining defendants, and each of them, and all persons acting
in concert with Defendants, from infringing Plaintiffs Patent;
5
6
3. A judgment and order requiring defendants, and each of them, to pay plaintiff all
7 damages caused by defendants infringement (but in no event less than a reasonable royalty)
8 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, or the total profit made by defendants from their infringement of the
9 product, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289;
10
11
4. A judgment and order requiring defendants, and each of them, to pay plaintiff
increased damages up to three times the amount found or assessed pursuant to section 284;
12
13
14
15
16 action; and
17
8. Such further and additional relief as this Court deems just and proper.
18
19
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
PAYNE IP LAW
22
23
By__________/s/________________________
Robert W. Payne
Attorney for Plaintiff
JAMES SANCHEZ
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
COMPLAINT
4