Period:6
Date:10/10/16
Title: The
Most Dangerous
game.
MLA
Citation
Meaning of
Title
(Literal &
symbolic
meanings)
Purpose
Restate/sum up
ELA standard(s)
POV
Narrator
Who? How do
you know?
Reliability
How do you
know?
Setting
Where
When
Infer as
accurately as
possible
Duration
About 3 days
Characters
Protagonist
Name
static/dynamic?
round/flat?
3+ details about
char. (not plot)
Antagonist
Name
static/dynamic?
round/flat?
3+ details about
char. (not plot)
Main or
Supporting
Rainsford-dynamic, round
1) Likes to hunt
2) Is a smart hunter
3) Only one to survive the hunt of count Zaroff
Names
3+ details about
ea. (not plot)
Function
Minor
Names
Brief who are
they
Function
Conflict
Internal
Rainsford has to stay smart about surviving the terrain of the island
External
Main
Plot
Exposition
Rising
Action
Climax
A MOMENT
when conflict is
definitively
resolved
Denoument/
Catharsis/
Falling
Action
Theme
Rainsford survives the three days of the hunt and kills Zaroff
Topic
Not same as
plot
Theme
Kill or be killed
Lesson we
learn about the
topic
How do
you know?
Rainsford has to kill Zaroff or be killed. If Rainsford kills Zaroff he wins and
can leave.
Symbols
5+
Symbol =????
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Self assess: Fill out the chart prior to submitting your work for feedback.
Comments: Student
Concerns
(Evidence criteria/standards (Improve or
met)
Remediate)
1-2
Criteria
(Proficient)
CCSS standard &
Description of mastery
Advanced
Exceeded
Standard
3-4
CCSS ELA R1
Read closely to determine
what the text says
explicitly and to make
logical inferences from it;
cite specific textual
evidence when writing or
speaking to support
conclusions drawn from
the text
CCSS ELA R2
Determine central ideas or
themes of a text and
analyze their development;
summarize the key
supporting details and ideas
Comments: Teacher
CCSS ELA R5
Analyze the structure of
texts, including how
specific sentences,
paragraphs, and larger
portions of the text (e.g., a
section, chapter, scene, or
stanza) relate to each
other and the whole
A student who earns a 4 goes beyond what was taught. A student who earns a 3 demonstrates a strong knowledge
of what is explicitly taught. A student who earns a 2 shows a grasp of the simpler concepts and may have errors or
omissions when it comes to the more complex concepts taught. A student who earns a 1 only demonstrates a partial
understanding of simpler concepts taught (Marzano 2006).