5 Genetic Toxicity
All food additives have to be tested on their mutagenic potential. Likewise the food
additive which is designated for direct human consumption, all metabolites have also
to be tested to exclude any risk.
Therefore, in the case of Stevia rebaudiana, Stevioside and the major metabolite
Steviol was tested.
In the past have been some controverse opinions about the genetic toxicity of
Stevioside and its degradation products after human consumption.
The controverse raised with studies on mutagenic activity of steviol. In a specific test
(Forward Mutation Assay) Steviol was treated with S-9 mix of 9000 x g liver
supernatant of Aroclor 1254 treated male Sprague-Dawley rats (Pezutto, J. et al.:
Metabolically activated steviol, the agylcone of Stevioside is mutagenic; Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 82 (1985) p.2478-2482)
In this study, Steviol expressed a mutagenic activity after metabolic activation of the
above described S-9 mix. Without the addition of S-9 mix Steviol did not express a
mutgenic activity.
This result suggests that a metabolic product of Steviol is produced in the liver by S-9
during the liver passage. However, until now the responsible agent was never found.
All Steviol derivates have been identified and synthesized but, however, none of them
exerted any mutagenicity under the same conditions of the "Forward Mutation Assay"
(Compadre et al.: Mass Spectral Analysis of some derivates and in vitro metabolites of
Steviol, the agyclone of the natural sweeteners Stevioside, Rebaudioside A and
Rubusoside; Biomedical and Environmental Mass Spectrometry 15 (1988) p.211-222).
With a synthetically produced 15-Oxosteviol further Forward Mutation Tests have
been done and a strong mutgenicity was found (Pezutto, J. et al.: Characterization of
bacterial mutagenicity mediated by 13-hydroxy-ent-kaurenoic acid (Steviol) and
severall structurally- related derivates and evaluation of potential to induce glutathione
S-transferase in mice; Mutation Research 169 (1986) p.93-106). However, this
suggested metabolite of Steviol was never found, neither in vitro nor in vivo.
In the meanwhile it is recognized that Steviol produces a mutagenic response by using
the "Forward Mutation Assay". It was detected that Steviol is mutagenic in a dose
depend manner in five laboratory animal species (hamster, rat, guinea pig, rabit and
mouse) when testing with a dose from 0,5 mg/l to 5 mg/l (Temcharoen, Punya et al.:
Mutagenic activity of Steviol to Salmonela typhimurium TM677: Comparison of
activity of S9 liver fractions from five laboratory animal species; Bulletin of Health
Science and Technology 1 (1998) p. 38-45). Previously it was suggested by Procinska,
that the mutagenic response of Steviol is a result of its purity (Procinska, E. et al.
Interpretation of results with then 8-azaguanine resistance system in Salmonella
1
- Chromosomal aberration or
- Micronucleus
Proposed Dose
5 mg/plate or
5 l/plate
5 l/ml, 5mg/ml or 10
mM
5 l/ml, 5mg/ml or 10
mM
2,000 mg/kg
2,000 mg/kg
1 = the only proposed test typ is L5178Y mouse lymphoma gene and chromosomal mutation test
2 = the only proposed test types are a) Chinese hamster fibroblasts (CHO, Chinese hamster ovary, or
CHL, Chinese hamster lung) or b)human lymphocytes or c) rat lymphocytes
The above presented tables shows that the only recommended test type for "Bacterial
in vitro tests" is the so called "Ames-Test". This test type has a minimum set of tests
with the following bacteria strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA 1535, TA1537 and
TA102. The so called "Forward Mutation Test" which caused the controversy about
Steviol is not part of the official test battery.
The further sections of this chapter describes the tests results obtained by Stevioside
and then the obtained results of Steviol according to the above given test battery
schedule.
It is well recognized that Stevioside itself it not mutagenic. An enormous testing was
done in the past. The most important results are given in the table below.
Genetic Toxicity Tests on Stevioside
Institute
Testsystem
National Cancer
Center (Japan)
National Institute of
Hygienic Science
(Japan)
Omiya Research
Research Laboratory
of Nikken Chemicals
(Japan)
Department of
Biochemistry, Chiang
Mai University,
(Thailand)
Omiya Research
Research of Nikken
Chemicals (Japan)
Testsample
Mutant
Frequency
Test with Salmonella
typhimurium G 46 in
mice
University of Illionois, Ames-Test with TM
Medical Center,
677 with and without
Chicago (USA)
S-9
National Institute of
Hygienic Science
(Japan)
National Institute of
Hygienic Science
(Japan)
School of Medicine,
Kobe University
(Japan)
Department of
Biochemistry, Chiang
Mai University,
(Thailand)
Department of
Biochemistry, Chiang
Mai University,
(Thailand)
a) Crude Juice
b) Stevia Herb Extract
c) Crystallized Sweet
Constituents
a) Pure Chemical
Substance
b) Derivates of Pure
Chemical Substance
Chromosomal Aber- a) Stevia Herb Extract
ration Test in vitro
with
celline
of
hamster lung
b) Crystallized Sweet
Constituents
Chromosomal Aber- Crystallized Sweet
ration Test in vitro Constituents
with
celline
of
hamsterfibroblasts
Chromosomal Aber- a) Stevia Herb Extract
ration in vivo in bone b) Crystallized Sweet
marrow cells of rats
Constituents
Amest-Test with TA Pure Chemical
98 and TA 100.
Substance
99% Stevioside
Chromosomal Aber- Pure Chemical
ration
in
human Substance
lympocytes with and 99% Stevioside
without
metabolic
activation
Results
Negative with TA 98 with and without metabolic activation.
Negative with TA 100 without metabolic activation; with
metabolic activation slightly postive.
Negative with TA 98 with and without metabolic activation.
Negative with TA 100 without metabolic activation; with
metabolic activation slightly postive.
Negative with TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1537 with and without
metabolic activation.
Negative with TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1537 with and without
metabolic activation.
Test sample
A) Crude Juice
B) Stevia Herb Extract
C) Chrystallized Sweet Constituents
Testsystem
Test Dose
10 g - 0,010 g/plate
Observations
See Figure 1
Reference
No. 5
A) Crude Juice
B) Stevia Herb Extract
C) Crystallized Sweet Constituents
Test system
Test Dose
Observation
See Figure 1
A) Crude Extract
B) Stevia Herb Extract
C) Crystallized Sweet Constituents
Test system
Maximum Dose
Observation
Conclusion from the authers
See figure 1
Tests were negative
Reference
No. 5
Test Dose
Observation
See Figure 1
Test system
Reference
10
11
Test system
Forward
Mutation
Assaywith
S.
typhimurium TM 677 with and without
metabolic activation obtained from
Aroclor 1254 pretreated rats.
Test Dose
Not given
Observaton
Reference
12
Test Typ
1. Bacterial in vitro tests
a) Reverse Mutation
TA 98 und TA 1001
TA 97, TA 98, TA 102, TA 104,
TA 1535, TA 15372
E.coli WP 2uvrA
(pKM101)2
b) Non bacterial in vitro tests
Chromosomal aberration test
with CHL cells2
Chromosomal aberration test
with human lympocytes1
Mammalian
cell
mutation:
L5178Y mouse lymphoma gene
and chromosomal mutation test3
2. In Vivo Tests
Micronucleus test with bone
marrow and hepatocytes in mice3
Micronucleus test with bone
marrow in mice2
Micronucleous test with bone
marrow of rats and mice1
Micronucleous test with bone
marrow of hamster1
Dose
Result
Proposed
Dose OECD
- S9 Mix + S9 Mix
1 - 20 mg/plate
negativ
0 - 5000 g/plate negativ
negativ
negativ
5 mg/plate
5 mg/plate
negativ
5 mg/plate
0 - 1,5 mg/ml
negativ
positiv
0 mg/ml
0 - 0,2 mg/ml
negativ
negativ
340 g/ml
negativ
5 l/ml
200 mg/kg
negative
2000 mg/kg
0 - 1000 mg/kg
negativ
2000 mg/kg
8000 mg/kg
negativ
2000 mg/kg
4000 mg/kg
negativ
2000 mg/kg
1,5