Anda di halaman 1dari 16

Fire Resistance of Structures 5

Martin Gillie
School of Engineering and Electronics
The University of Edinburgh

Behaviour of construction materials at high temperature

The kind of materials used in construction and the manner in which they respond to fire, clearly has a
great bearing on how a structure will respond to fire. It is therefore important to develop an understanding
of the behaviour of structural materials subjected to fire in terms of both the heat transfer characteristics
of the material and its mechanical response to heating. The following text will attempt to outline the
behaviour in fire of the most important materials of construction in simple terms.
The manner in which a material responds to fire can be classified (somewhat arbitrarily) under the following groups according to behaviour or properties
1. Chemical: Decomposition, charring.
2. Physical: Variation in density (), softening, melting, spalling.
3. Mechanical: Strength as measured by yield or peak stressed ( fy for steel and fcu for concrete),
stiffness as measured by the modulus of elasticity (E), creep, thermal expansion as measured by
the coefficient of thermal expansion ().
4. Thermal: Thermal conductivity (k), specific heat (c).
Chemical changes such as decomposition and charring are specific to wood. Physical effects such as
spalling happen in concrete and masonry. Steels soften and creep but are unlikely to melt at the maximum
temperatures experienced in normal fires.The following table shows the properties that are of interest for
common structural materials:
Property
Concrete Steel Masonry Wood Plastics Gypsum Glass
Chemical
Decomposition
x
x
x
x
Charring
x
x
Physical
Density
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Softening
x
x
Melting
x
x
Spalling
x
x
Mechanical
Strength
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Stiffness
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Creep
x
x
x
x
x
x
Thermal expansion
x
x
x
x
x
Thermal
Thermal Conductivity
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Specific heat
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Thermal conductivity determines the rate of heat transfer in the materials. Specific heat determines
the heat absorption capacity of a material for a given rise in temperature. Both of these properties are
1

k
combined in a dimensionless measure called thermal diffusivity ( c
) which determines the temperature
distributions that will exist in a material at various points in time during a fire. These properties are
themselves dependent upon temperature.

Structural engineers are primarily concerned with mechanical response (when forces and/or displacements are imposed). For structural materials this is governed by the mechanical properties of that material, which in turn has a great bearing on the response of whole structures to fire. The main mechanical
properties of interest are, the strength of a material, which is defined as the maximum stress the material
can carry. The property of strength determines the load carrying capacity of a structural material. The
stiffness of a material is defined as the force required for a unit deformation, measured by the Youngs
Modulus of Elasticity (E). This property a structural material determines the magnitudes of displacements a structure is likely to experience. Both of these quantities are generally considered constant for
most materials at normal temperatures and normal loads, however they reduce at high temperatures and
loads (as the material degradation due to high temperatures and loads erode a materials capability to
carry stress).
Creep is the strain (i.e. deformation per unit length) that occurs in materials with time. So materials
continue to undergo deformation if a load is applied over a long period of time. For most materials the
creep rate increases significantly at high temperatures.
Most materials expand on heating (with a few notable exceptions, such as wood), and in many cases
(especially in large structures with stiff restraints to expansion) this phenomena can dominate the structural response. Thermal expansion is measured by the strain induced by unit degree rise in temperature,
defined as the coefficient of thermal expansion .
All of the above properties can vary with temperature and good estimates of them must be available to
allow an accurate analysis of the response of structures in fire. In the following sections the effect of high
temperature upon the aforementioned properties of the most important structural materials is discussed.

1.1

Steel

Steel is arguably the most important structural material in modern construction. Steel is used in construction as structural steel or as reinforcing steel for reinforced concrete. Reinforcing steel can be in
the form reinforcing bars or high tensile strength steel tendons in pre-stressed concrete. Structural steel
is considered considerably more vulnerable to fire than reinforcing steels which are encased in concrete
which has good insulating properties and so protects reinforcing steels from significant losses in strength.
Steels are very good conductors and tend to be used in thin sections. They are, therefore, liable to
heat up very quickly in fires if not insulated. Due to these reasons most main structural steel members
are required to be insulated in current design codes. The rate of heating depends upon the parameters
of thermal conductivity, specific heat and density. The density of steel is approximately 7850 kg/m3 .
The thermal conductivity of steel is approx. 54 W/mK at room temperature and reduces to about half
this value at 800 C. Figure 1 shows the variation of thermal conductivity with temperature. For simple
calculations the specific heat of steel can be taken as approximately 600 J/kg K. Figure 2 shows the
variation of specific heat with temperature.
Figure 3 shows stress/strain curves for structural steel at high temperatures. The stress/strain curve
is a measure of material stiffness. The Figure shows that the strength of cold rolled structural steel
increases with heating up to temperatures of 300 C (the stiffness doesnt), however thereafter reduces
rather rapidly. Similar curves for cold-drawn pre-stressing steel are shown in Figure 4, which show a
different pattern of behaviour, notably a considerably higher rate of strength degradation. Pre-stressing
steel does regain its strength upon cooling to the same degree as hot-rolled steel.
In design the yield strength of steel is required, however from the Figures above it is clear that a well
defined yield strength disappears when steels are heated. The concept of proof stress is used in this case.
A 1% proof stress is illustrated in Figure 5. Also for design purposes, it is convenient to represent the
2

Figure 1: Thermal conductivity of steel

Figure 2: Specific heat of steel

Figure 3: Stress/strain curves for mild structural steel

Figure 4: Stress/strain curves for cold drawn pre-stressing steel

Figure 5: 1% proof stress

change of mechanical properties with temperature in terms of their magnitude at ambient temperature
(say 20 C).
The coefficient of thermal expansion of steel, , is around 12 106 / C and increases slightly with
temperature. At about 730 C, steel undergoes a phase change (energy is absorbed without increase in
temperature) and a denser structure results. The heat absorbed at phase change causes delay in further
temperature rise. A simple relationship provides a useful estimate of thermal expansion variation with
temperature,1
= 6.1 106 + 3.969 T
(1)
where, T is the temperature change in C. The property of thermal expansion of structural steel can be
both beneficial to the structure or be the cause of great damage. For instance a steel beam anchored to a
masonry wall can cause it to collapse by expansion (during heating) or contraction (during cooling - this
can make masonry walls very hazardous in post-fire operations).
Steel reinforcement in reinforced concrete loses strength at high temperatures more rapidly than structural steel, however given adequate concrete cover, it rarely reaches high enough temperatures and in
general is expected to retain its properties in a fire.

1.2

Concrete

Concrete has excellent fire resistance properties and maintains its integrity and strength in very high
temperatures. The thermal properties of concrete depend upon the aggregate type used, due to chemical changes (crystal structure) in aggregate compounds. Three common types are; Siliceous aggregates
(gravel, granite, flint), calcareous aggregates (limestone) and lightweight aggregates made from sintered fuel ash (Lytag) and expanded clay. Siliceous aggregate concretes have a tendency to spall due
to high thermal conductivity of such aggregate. Calcareous aggregate concretes are relatively more sta5

Figure 6: Relative change of mechanical properties with temperature

ble. Lightweight concrete (LWC) has the best thermal properties of all, i.e. less than half the thermal
conductivity (0.8 W/mK) of normal weight concrete (NWC) and consequently loses its strength at a
considerably lower rate. The thermal diffusivity of LWC is only slightly lower than NWC, so the extra
fire resistance in LWC comes not so much from reduced temperatures, but from the stability of the light
weight aggregates at high temperatures. The typical density of NWC is 2350 kg/m3 and that of LWC is
1850 kg/m3 .
NWC initially expands with rise of temperature but progressive loss of moisture from the cement paste
causes it to shrink and helps to offset thermal expansion of aggregate. Heat is used up in drying and thus
reducing further the rate of temperature rise of the concrete surface, which is low to start with due to
poor conductivity. The loss of strength due to dehydration is quite often confined to the surface layers.
Figure 7 shows typical thermal conductivities of various concretes with temperature. Figure 8 shows the

Figure 7: Thermal conductivity of various concretes varying with temperature

variation of specific heat of various concretes with temperature.


The coefficient of thermal expansion of concretes is of the same order as of steel, but here again the it is
considerably higher for NWC, up to 14 106 / C, while that of LWC is about 8 106 / C. Concrete
thermal expansion depends considerably upon the stress in concrete, so for large compressive stresses
the thermal expansion coefficient can be considerably lower that in unstressed concrete. This is caused
7

Figure 8: Specific heat of various concretes varying with temperature

by the fact that creep effects become very important in concrete at around 400 C, with strains increasing
considerably for small increases in temperature beyond this point. This effect is termed as transient
thermal creep and it can be so large at large compressive stresses as to completely counter the effect
of thermal expansion, even leading to contraction. Concrete stiffness (i.e. the slope of the stress/strain
curve) also reduces significantly at high temperatures, which also results in additional strains. These
effects can cause large deflections in concrete structural members.
The strength loss in concrete is slow because of the low thermal diffusivity. Figure 9 shows the stress/strain
curves for a type of NWC. For design purposes, the loss in concrete strength in temperature is generally

Figure 9: Relative stress strain curves for dense concrete varying with temperature

required. Experimentally determined values from a number of sources with a proposed practical design
curve2 is shown in Figure 10. A simpler design curve for both normal and light weight concrete is shown
in Figure 11.
One of the most destructive effects of fire on concrete is spalling (loss of surface material), which ranges
from superficial surface damage to explosive blowout of large chunks of material. The intensity of
spalling generally depends upon the type of aggregate used, with NWC much more likely to suffer
spalling damage compared to LWC. Siliceous aggregates undergo sudden increases in volume at certain
temperatures (through crystal structure changes). In severe fires these volume changes may be rapid
enough to cause excessive internal stresses and cause the surface layers to spall, thus exposing the reinforcement, which can lead to loss of load-bearing capacity. Spalling is characterised by lines of striation
9

Figure 10: Strength reduction in normal weight concrete with temperature

10

Figure 11: Strength reduction in normal and light weight concretes with temperature

and loss of surface material resulting in chipped, cracked, broken or cratered appearance. Any kind of
differential expansion can lead to spalling. So rapid cooling can also cause spalling, a situation that may
occur in extinguishing fires with water. In fires spalling is generally associated with high temperature.
However areas of concrete or masonry under high compressive stress may spall at relatively lower temperatures further away from the hottest regions. Spalled areas may also appear lighter in colour than
adjacent areas through exposure of clean subsurface material. Colour changes in concrete can be used
as rough guide to the temperature reached and the residual strength, i.e.
Grey: (Under 300 C) Minimal loss of strength
Pink, red or red/brown: (300-650 C) 10 to 60 % of the strength is lost (for NWC).
Grey-white: (650-900 C) 60 to 100% loss of strength.
Buff: (Over 1000 C) Sintered.

1.3

Wood

Wood (or timber) is a combustible material, however, it is also one of the most widely used materials
of construction. It is therefore fortunate that wood possesses certain features that allow it to provide
satisfactory performance in most building fires. One of these is that it is not easily ignitable, but the
most important property of wood is the formation of char after ignition, shown in Figure 12. Charred
wood is likely to be found in nearly all structural fires. It is the solid residue (mainly carbon) from the
decomposition of wood. It shrinks as it forms and develops cracks and blisters. The analysis of char
patterns and relative depth and appearance can provide vital clues about the spread of fire. The rate
of char formation varies with species of wood, mainly depending upon the bulk density and incident
heat flux3 and also depends upon the density and moisture content. In combination with a low thermal
11

Figure 12: Char formation in wood

12

conductivity, and a protective layer of char, heavy timber sections can provide excellent fire resistance
and therefore continue to be used, especially in North America. The concept of sacrificial timber is used
in design, i.e. using a larger section of timber than necessary for carrying the design load, with the excess
sufficient to protect the member through a given duration of fire. Figure 13 shows, how this concept may
be used in design.

Figure 13: Design concept for large section timber structural members

In terms of its mechanical behaviour, wood is an orthotropic material, with considerably different properties parallel and perpendicular to the grain, as illustrated by Figure 14. The Figure also illustrates the
significantly different mechanical response of wood in tension and compression (like concrete).
Strength reduction in wood begins as soon as it is heated. Compressive strength reduces at a higher rate
than tensile strength. Figure 15 shows the strength and stiffness reduction with temperature relative to
ambient values.
The loss of strength in timber sections can also be considered proportional to the rate of char formation.
Figure 16 shows the strength and stiffness based on the distance from the char layer relative to ambient
values.
Timber does not expand on heating like steel and concrete and therefore does not threaten adjoining
masonry in the same manner.

1.4

Masonry

Masonry consisting of either brick-work or of concrete block-work is inherently stable in fire. The
reasons for masonry wall failures are often nothing to do with the fire resistance capability of masonry
materials. The following is a partial list of masonry failures due to structural reasons:
Steel/Composite beams may cause instability in a connected wall through expansion (or contraction at cooling).
High walls with low slenderness ratio (i.e. thin).
Lack of lateral support.
13

Figure 14: Typical stress-strain curves for wood

Figure 15: Effect on temperature on the mechanical properties of wood

14

Figure 16: Variation of wood mechanical properties with distance from char layer

Movement of super-structure supported on masonry.


Differential heating due to a progressive pre-flashover fire.
Masonry can also suffer integrity failure when fire loads are excessive. Bricks can withstand temperatures
of around a 1000 C and they melt at about 1400 C. In domestic fires integrity failures are more common.
Most comments about spalling discussed earlier apply to masonry as well.

1.5

Glass

The main use of glass in buildings is in glazing for windows and doors. In this role, glass is has little
resistance to fire and generally cracks very quickly because of the temperature difference across the
exposed surfaces. Double glazing does not improve this behaviour significantly. Wire reinforcement
does provide relatively greater integrity, however in general glazing should not be relied upon to remain
intact in a fire.

1.6

Gypsum

Dehydrated gypsum is well known as Plaster of Paris, which is a white powder which sets hard after
being mixed into a paste with water. In building gypsum plaster and plaster boards are widely used in
interior linings and partitions. In addition to the low thermal diffusivity with the large amount of chemically bonded water in gypsum building products allows it absorb a considerable amount of heat from
fires and therefore act as a cheap and effective fire retardant material. Once the water of cystallisation
has evaporated, gypsum plaster-boards have practically no strength left (other than that provided by the
fibre glass reinforcement).
15

1.7

Plastics

A large variety of plastics are used in buildings. The main disadvantage is that all plastics are combustible. Certain treatments can increase ignition temperatures and inhibit flame spread, but nothing can
be added to make them non-combustible.

Resources

The following webpage provides more information on this topic


http://www.umist.ac.uk/departments/civil/research/structures/strucfire/

References
[1] P.J. Di Nenno, editor. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Society of Fire Protection
Engineers, 1995.
[2] A.H. Buchanan. Structural Design for Fire Safety. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2002.
[3] D. Drysdale. An Introduction to Fire Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, 2nd edition, 1998.

16