DECEMBER 2016
A PROPOSAL FOR
QUALITY AUDIT REPORT FOR ARENA I & II
Submission to:
LOTUS GREEN
DECEMBER 2016
Submission by:
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD
Project Management Team
A PROPOSAL FOR
QUALITY AUDIT REPORT FOR ARENA I & II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0
OBJECTIVE
1.1
SCOPE OF WORKS
2.
2.0
AUDIT LOCATION
2.1
SCOPE OF WORKS
3.
4.
5.
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS
5.0
RECURRING NON-CONFORMANCES
5.1
PROCESS NON-CONFORMANCES
5.2
5.3
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
6.
IMPROVEMENT AREAS
10
6.0
MEP
10
6.1
FINISHES
10
7.
ANNEXURES
11
7.0
ANNEXURE - I
10
7.1
ANNEXURE - II
13
7.3
ANNEXURE - II
15
A PROPOSAL FOR
QUALITY AUDIT REPORT FOR ARENA I & II
AUDIT TEAM
LOCATION OF AUDIT
SCOPE OF AUDIT
CIVIL WORK
PROJECT STATUS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 OBJECTIVE
Lotus Greens has engaged Cushman & Wakefield (India) Private for the purpose of Quality Audit of their
upcoming residential project Lotus Green Arena at Sector 79, Noida. The purpose of the audit is to evaluate
the extent of implementation of the Quality Management Plan (QMP) established for the project.
The idea is to set a system of routine technical activities to measure and control the quality of the
construction works through consistent checks to ensure accuracy and completeness in reference to the
Quality Control Plan. This exercise aims at highlighting the good practices implemented at site and noting
areas of improvement and incorporating the same as standard project practices.
This report is part of the exercise and limited to Lotus Green Arena Residential Development Project at
Sector 79, Noida.
The following towers have been covered in the audit for DECEMBER 2016:
ARENA 01: TOWER A
ARENA 01: TOWER D NON TOWER AREA BETWEEN TOWER C & D
ARENA 01: TOWER J
ARENA 02: TOWER B(Not in Picture)
Implementation
Remarks
CIVIL
1
Water Proofing
To be Implemented
As per QMP
process is being
followed, further
Suggestions have
been made to
improve
the
documentation.
NA
NA
NA
NA
Under
Implementation
MEP
1
NA AT PRESENT
INTERIOR FINISHING
1
NA AT PRESENT
It has been observed during the monthly audit that only the above listed checklists have been under
implementation at site. The on-going works includes only civil activities at present, the implementation at this
stage is limited to the above activities.
It is understood from the site team that implementation of the remaining QM tools are in progress and will be
streamlined in the coming weeks.
Description
Remarks
CIVIL
1
Material acceptance criteria for civil works and process followed is as per
Good industry practice.
Audit team verified the test records for civil materials maintained at site
and found in order. Although no consolidated Quality test log is maintained
at present.
Refer Annexure 03
Team has no site lab presently, but it is planned to have lab at site, Random
third party tests are being conducted for reinforcement steel and concrete,
No material is allowed without MTC.
Refer Annexure 03
Refer Annexure 03
MEP
1
NA AT PRESENT
INTERIOR FINISHING
1
NA AT PRESENT
MISCELLANEOUS
1
All physical dimensions of the apartment audited (as compared with GFCs
shared by the site team). An average variation of 10-15mm was found.
Refer Annexure 01
5. AUDIT OBSERVATIONS
LEGEND
MOST CRITICAL
MODERATELY CRITICAL
LEAST CRITICAL
Observations
NA
CIVIL WORKS
Photograph
NA
Observations
CIVIL WORKS
Photograph
Remarks
10
S. No.
Observations
1.
NA AT PRESENT
S. No.
Observations
NA AT PRESENT
MEP WORKS
Photograph
FINISHING WORKS
Photograph
Observations
Site lab is not yet establish, material
testing is being done randomly by
third party.
CIVIL WORKS
Photograph
NA
NA
NA
NA
S. No.
1
Observations
Point regarding Conduits laid on slab
just before casting should also be
mentioned in Pour card/Check list
S. No.
Observations
NA AT PRESENT
MEP WORKS
Photograph
NA
FINISHING WORKS
Photograph
CIVIL WORKS
Photograph
Observations
Only Civil work is under progress so
far. Reinforcement of Non tower slab
between tower C and D had some
issues (Mentioned above) as compare
to other work which were pointed
out on the spot. No major issue
having quality impact was found during
site inspection of above given
locations.
S. No.
Observations
NA AT PRESENT
S. No.
Observations
NA AT PRESENT
NA
MEP WORKS
Photograph
FINISHING WORKS
Photograph
Description
All material test certificates were available at site along with respective check
lists for ready reference.
TC for few materials were available at time of audit, the rest need to be
arranged for.
3
4
All prior testing requirements that have been met before initiating an activity
should be cross referenced on the respective checklists.
Date and location (tower - floor - apartment number - room) as applicable
should be mentioned on every checklist and on each page so that when page
is missing one can easily refer.
It is strongly recommended that all points in the check list should be
considered and none should be left incomplete. In case of any aspect not being
applicable at site, the same should be indicated on the checklist.
It was observed that during checking of reinforcement and shuttering not all
the points are mentioned in the checklist. Final approval for concrete pour
cannot be given until every single point is closed. In some cases not all the
points were closed.
Remarks
Process Implemented
Annexure - III
Partially Implemented
Annexure - III
Partially Implemented
Annexure - III
Annexure - III
6. IMPROVEMENT AREAS
6.0 MEP
S. No.
Description
NA AT PRESENT
Remarks
6.1 FINISHES
S. No.
Description
NA AT PRESENT
Remarks
10
ANNXURE 01
11
Area
LxB
(as per GFC)
LxB
(Actual)
Variation
(Length)
Variation
(Width)
Avg. %age
Variation
Bedroom 2
4760
4765
5 mm
0.01%
Bedroom 2
3600
3608
8 mm
0.01%
Bedroom 2
4700
4695
5 mm
0.009%
Bedroom 2
1830
1825
5 mm
0.009%
Bedroom 2
3660
3665
5 mm
0.01%
Master Bedroom
3440
3435
5 mm
0.009%
Master Bedroom
3090
3095
5 mm
0.01%
Master Bedroom
1030
1040
10 mm
0.01%
Master Bedroom
3265
3260
5 mm
0.009%
10
Master Bedroom
2580
2590
10 mm
0.01%
11
Master Bedroom
Toilet
4370
4380
10 mm
0.01%
12
1135
1140
5 mm
0.01%
13
Toilet
2560
2570
10 mm
0.01%
14
Toilet
2940
2930
10 mm
0.01%
AVERAGE VARIATION
0.01%
12
ANNXURE 02
13
Description
DECEMBER 2016
Status
Site Lab
Total
Approved
Rejected
NA
Physical Analysis
Chemical Analysis
NA
34
34
Cement
Reinforcement Steel
Physical Analysis
Chemical Analysis
34
32
Coarse Aggregate
NA
Fine Aggregate
NA
Silt Content
Fly Ash
NA
Red Bricks
NA
Sieve Analysis
Compressive Strength
Dimension
AAC Block
NA
NA
72
72
Water
NA
SUMMARY
Total No. of Tests Conducted
NA
146
%Age Approved
98.64
%Age Rejected
1.36
It was observed during the Audit-I that no Quality test log was being maintained, C&W team suggested Lotus
green team to maintain quality test records showing all the tests conducted (Internal and third party) and number
of tests accepted and rejected. The suggested process is still not adopted, although separate registers are being
maintained and total no of tests can be counted but this cannot be continue as it will be very difficult to maintain
large number of data and counting them every time in order to analyse total number of tests done, accepted and
rejected.
14
ANNXURE 03
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Arena I Non Tower Slab Beam reinforcement laid down after observation
32