Keller Graduate School of Management

Peer Performance Evaluation Sheet

Name of Team Member Reviewed

Stanley Gardner

Name of Reviewer

David M Fontanez

Week

Week 3

Please assign a numeric value to each item according to the following scale:

4
3
2
1
0

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Failure

1. Demonstrated realistic understanding of role within the team

(4)

2. Worked well with other team members

(4)

3. Contributed actively to team effort

(4)

4. Completed assignments on time

(4)

5. Turned in assignments in usable form

(4)

6. Contributed extra effort to meet team goals

(4)

7. Shared information, perceptions, and feedback

(4)

8. Demonstrated commitment to quality of Final Project

(4)

Total Points Assigned (add the numbers)

(32)

Qualitative Comments (explain why you gave the ratings above):

Completing work on time.

Keller Graduate School of Management

Peer Performance Evaluation Sheet
Name of Team Member Reviewed

Danielle Kamgang

Name of Reviewer

David M . Fontanez

Week

Week 3

Please assign a numeric value to each item according to the following scale:

4
3
2
1
0

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Failure

9. Demonstrated realistic understanding of role within the team

(4)

10. Worked well with other team members

(4)

11. Contributed actively to team effort

(4)

12. Completed assignments on time

(4)

13. Turned in assignments in usable form

(4)

14. Contributed extra effort to meet team goals

(4)

15. Shared information, perceptions, and feedback

(4)

16. Demonstrated commitment to quality of Final Project

(4)

Total Points Assigned (add the numbers)

(32)

Qualitative Comments (explain why you gave the ratings above):

Fantastic Team Player.

Keller Graduate School of Management

Peer Performance Evaluation Sheet
Name of Team Member Reviewed

Charles Roberts

Name of Reviewer

David M. Fontanez

Week

Week 3

Please assign a numeric value to each item according to the following scale:

4
3
2
1
0

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Failure

17. Demonstrated realistic understanding of role within the team

(4)

18. Worked well with other team members

(4)

19. Contributed actively to team effort

(4)

20. Completed assignments on time

(4)

21. Turned in assignments in usable form

(4)

22. Contributed extra effort to meet team goals

(4)

23. Shared information, perceptions, and feedback

(4)

24. Demonstrated commitment to quality of Final Project

(4)

Total Points Assigned (add the numbers)

(32)

Qualitative Comments (explain why you gave the ratings above):

Sharing tasks on time!

Keller Graduate School of Management

Peer Performance Evaluation Sheet
Name of Team Member Reviewed

Self

Name of Reviewer

DAVID M FONTANEZ

Week
Please assign a numeric value to each item according to the following scale:

4
3
2
1
0

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Failure

25. Demonstrated realistic understanding of role within the team

(4)

26. Worked well with other team members

(4)

27. Contributed actively to team effort

(4)

28. Completed assignments on time

(4)

29. Turned in assignments in usable form

(3)

30. Contributed extra effort to meet team goals

(4)

31. Shared information, perceptions, and feedback

(3)

32. Demonstrated commitment to quality of Final Project

(4)

Total Points Assigned (add the numbers)

(34)

Qualitative Comments (explain why you gave the ratings above):

Worked hard on a timely base even with all his set backs do to bing in a combat zone
he was still able to complete his work and add value too the team.