Scholars' Mine
International Conference on Case Histories in
Geotechnical Engineering
Ricardo Dobry
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
George E. Leventis
Langan International, New York, NY
This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International
Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright
Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact
scholarsmine@mst.edu.
ABSTRACT
The Chacao Channel bridge, a planned privatized/concession bridge project, is to link the island of Chilo with continental Chile
through the Chacao Channel. When completed, it will be the longest suspension bridge in South America (2,365 m) with two
approximately equal spans linking three pylons. The location of the bridge presents a combination of unprecedented challenges in the
design and construction making it very unique, including: extreme seismicity with the largest earthquake recorded to date anywhere in
the world having occurred very close to the envisioned bridge location (the 1960 Valdivia Earthquake with a moment magnitude of
9.5!); extremely strong sea currents and tide fluctuations within the channel (up to 5-6 meters/sec and 6 meters, respectively); the
general area being surrounded by active volcanoes; and a history of Tsunamis. The above extreme challenges resulted in construction
cost escalations; inevitably, in 2006, after a significant portion of the investigations and design was completed, the Chilean ministry of
Public Works put the project on hold. The above extreme physical challenges were the main reason for the cost escalation. This paper
provides an overview of the design of the envisioned bridge, discusses the methodology to overcome the unique challenges of the
bridge location and focuses on the geotechnical and seismic aspects of the design.
OVERVIEW
The envisioned Chacao Channel bridge will be located in
Southern Chile, Region 10, Los Lagos, Chiloe. The bridge will
connect Route 5 South of Chile between the Continent and the
Island of Chiloe, crossing the Chacao Channel (Figure 1).
Several facts make this projects location unique; they are
listed below
The bridge setting is located in an active seismic region,
close to the location where the 1960 Valdivia subduction
earthquake occurred; this is the largest earthquake reported in
modern history with a moment magnitude of Mw = 9.5. This
earthquake was associated with ground deformation over a
distance of more than 800 km parallel to the trench, with
subsidences up to 3 m and uplifts up to 6 m. The bridge area
sunk approximately 2 to 3 meters.
Based on reports from historic earthquakes, tsunamis have
occurred in the region, with reported wave heights up to 20m.
The sea level at the project location varies significantly, with
maximum tidal ranges of about 6 m. Respectively, currents
reach velocities of 5-6+ m/s (about 10-12+ knots).
There are at least ten volcanic sources within a 200 Km
radius area which represent potential natural hazard centers.
DESIGN CONCEPT
This very long span would drive the cost too high for the
bridge to be built. However, roughly in the middle of the
channel there is a submerged islet (called Roca Remolinos, see
Figure 3) that could potentially be used to support a third
pylon and cut the span in half. The biggest concern from the
beginning of this project was if Roca Remolinos was strong
enough to support a bridge pylon. Geotechnical investigations
and several studies provided a design where the bridge with
three pylons could be constructed.
The bridge scheme is a suspension bridge, with two main
spans supported by three Pylons (North, Central and South)
and having a continuous deck. The North (Continent) and
South (Island of Chiloe) Pylons are to have a distance of about
1050 m and 1100 m from the Central Pylon. The three Pylons
will rise about 180 m above the mean sea level (Figure 4 and
5). The positioning of the central pylon has to be in the middle
to provide the symmetry necessary for the design (equal
spans), and symmetry is what drove the positioning of the
North Pylon in the water. If Roca Remolinos was closer to
either shore a different scheme would be needed.
Past Studies
Several studies were completed before the project was
awarded to the concession. These studies include a
Preliminary Investment Study in 1997 by Ingenieria Cuatro
Ltda, a Study of Alternatives and a Technical Feasibility
Study in 2000 by ICUATRO-COWI Joint Venture. The
distance to be spanned is approximately 2200 meters, and a
single span suspension bridge would require two pylons,
GEOLOGICAL ANALYSES
PROPOSED FOUNDATIONS
The general foundation scheme was setup in the technical
feasibility study by ICUATRO-COWI. Based on the given
at the time geometry and soil conditions, the bridge
foundation will include two anchor blocks, a shallow
foundation for the south pylon, and deep foundations for
the central and north pylon.
The complementary investigations and studies showed that
in general, the soil strength parameters were the same or
better than those assumed in the feasibility study, thus the
same foundation concept was kept.
The two envisioned anchor foundations are massive
concrete blocks, approximately 33 and 29 m high (south
and north respectively), with a width of 35 m and a length
that varies, reaching 54 m. The foundation of the South
Pylon consists of two square footings 19 m x 19 m, 7meters-thick, connected together with a beam 4 m wide by
3 m deep by 10 m long.
SEISMIC ANALYSES
During the preliminary studies it was obvious that the
seismic hazard at the bridge setting is very significant
given the past earthquakes in the general area. Seismic
hazard studies were carried out during the technical
feasibility study and two main seismic sources were
identified to influence the bridge location. These were an
interplate source corresponding to the subduction zone of
the Nazca plate beneath the South American plate (located
offshore in the Chilean trench), and an intraplate source,
represented by the Gulf of Ancud fault (FGA) which was
believed to be an active fault crossing the bridge. The FGA
was believed to be responsible for a 6.8-magnitude
earthquake associated with an aftershock of the 1960
Valdivia earthquake. In those studies, three earthquake
intensity levels were identified relating to different
performance objectives of the bridge: A Safety Evaluation
Earthquake (SEE-collapse), a Functional Evaluation
Earthquake (FEE-service) and a Construction Earthquake
(CE), all corresponding to different probabilities of
exceedance. The various seismic parameters corresponding
to the different events are presented in Table 1.
Seismic
Source
Magnitude
Ms
Depth
(km)
Epicentral
distance
(km)
Subduction
(SEE)
8.5
30
80
Crustal (SEE)
7.0
10
22.5
Subduction
8.0
30
(FEE)
Crustal (FEE)
6.0
10
Subduction
7.5
30
(CE)
Crustal (CE)
(*)
(*)
(*) The CE-crustal event was negligible.
80
10
80
(*)
North Shore
Roca Remolinos
As mentioned earlier, the north pylon was placed close to a
relatively steep slope at the north bank (Figure 14) and the
slope stability and slope displacements during the design
seismic event were estimated.
SCOURING STUDIES
The scouring potential was estimated based on bottom
tracking measurements and ADCP (Accoustic Doppler
Current Profiler) measurements at the edge of the slope at
the north pylon location. Based on the above data and the
north pylon soil material information collected during the
geotechnical investigation, it was estimated that the rate of
material loss the North shore will suffer in the next 100
years, is about 0.2 to 0.5 m per year. Changes in the
bathymetries taken in 2000 and 2005 suggest that 0.5 m
per year is the more reasonable value to follow. Figure 16
is representative of the strong currents in the channel.
These findings suggested moving the North Pylon 50 m to
the North. This 50-m displacement due to scour
considerations is independent of the 25-m displacement
due to the slope stability considerations. However, since
both displacements consider extreme events that will not
occur simultaneously, a 50-m displacement of the north
pylon to the north was decided. This distance would
provide adequate factors of safety at all times for slope
stability and give the necessary time to repair the scour
protection when necessary. Figure 17 shows a
recommendation for the scouring protection measures.
W. Romberg [2006] Interpretative Geotechnical Report North Pylon April 2006, Report No. SP2-P-RPT-MG-GENG-GEO-00003-Aa
REFERENCES
10