C 2015 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Key Words:
paranasal sinuses; paranasal sinus disease; endoscopic sinus surgery; maxillectomy; sinus surgery
2 Department
are still regions of the maxillary sinus that remain technically difficult to access in order to manage benign and
malignant disease of the maxillary sinus, pterygopalatine
fossa, and infratemporal fossa.
We elaborate on the prelacrimal approach to the maxillary sinus originally described by Zhou et al.6 Approaches
such as middle meatal antrostomy, mega-antrostomy, and
endoscopic medial maxillectomy are limited in their utility
because in many cases the surgeon can experience difficulty
in visualizing and accessing the anterior and anterolateral
walls of the maxillary sinus. The prelacrimal recess can
be an area of particular difficulty. The advantages of
utilizing a prelacrimal approach include the provision of wide access to all walls of the maxillary sinus
while still preserving the nasolacrimal duct and inferior
turbinate (Fig. 1). This approach to the maxillary sinus
also incorporates the prelacrimal recess, negating the
aforementioned difficulties and is particularly useful in
addressing pathology of the anterior wall of the maxillary
sinus (Fig. 2). It is also a useful aid when lateral access
to the pterygopalatine fossa or infratemporal fossa is
needed.
In our version of this procedure we emphasize the
importance of an uncinectomy and middle meatal antrostomy as well as removal of bone from the margin of the
piriform aperture in all cases. We feel that the addition of
the uncinectomy and wide middle meatal antrostomy facilitates improved surveillance of the maxillary sinus in the
postoperative period via the use of angled or flexible endoscopes. Removal of bone at the margin of the piriform
aperture permits improved access to the prelacrimal recess
and facilitates visualization of the anterior maxillary sinus
wall.
Beyond the standard complications of endoscopic
sinus surgery, potential complications of the prelacrimal
approach include damage to the nasolacrimal apparatus, nasal dryness, and facial numbness. The removal of
soft tissue attachments to the piriform aperture has been
214
FIGURE 1. The access available with the prelacrimal approach. The highlighted region indicates the potential operative field visualized with a
0-degree rigid endoscope.
FIGURE 2. The access window created through the prelacrimal recess into
the maxillary sinus via the prelacrimal approach. The nasolacrimal duct can
be seen to the left side of the image orientated vertically (1). To the right
of the nasolacrimal duct is the mucosa of the medial wall of the maxillary
sinus (2), and further to the right side of the image the anterior wall of the
maxillary sinus (3) can be identified.
Procedure
This procedure is conducted under a general anesthetic. The
nose is initially prepared via injection of local anesthetic
with adrenaline to the nasal septum, inferior turbinate,
and lateral nasal wall adjacent and anterior to the inferior turbinate. Topical vasoconstrictor is also applied via
neuropatties to the mucosa within the surgical field. The
procedure is shown in Supporting Video 1.
215
FIGURE 3. The incision for the prelacrimal approach can be seen along
the superior edge of the inferior turbinate turning inferiorly at the anterior
head.
Morrissey et al.
FIGURE 8. The final osteotomies are performed in the posterior bony nasolacrimal duct.
FIGURE 9. The entire maxillary sinus can now be accessed while keeping
the nasolacrimal duct intact.
216
Conclusion
The prelacrimal approach to the maxillary sinus provides
the rhinologist with a technique that allows access to all
aspects of the maxillary sinus while preserving the inferior
turbinate and nasolacrimal duct. The addition of a wide
maxillary antrostomy aids postoperative surveillance and
the penetration of topical medications into the maxillary
sinus.
FIGURE 11. (A-E) This patient presented with an inverted papilloma situated at the lateral aspect of the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus as seen
on these coronal and axial images (A, B). (C) Shows the access available to
the lesion via a prelacrimal approach. The inverted papilloma (1) can be visualized arising from the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus (2). The infraorbital
nerve can be seen traversing the roof of the sinus (*). (D) Shows the surgeon
operating a drill over the site of new bone formation at the base of the
papilloma on the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus, whereas (E) shows the
end result with complete macroscopic clearance of the disease. Monopolar
diathermy has been used for hemostasis over the site of bony drilling.
217
Acknowledgments
Medical illustrations provided by Mr. Nicholas Wormald
with thanks.
Morrissey et al.
References
1. Hollinshead WH, Anatomy for Surgeons: The Head
and Neck. New York , NY: Harper & Row; 1982.
2. Hosemann W, Scotti O, Bentzien S. Evaluation of telescopes and forceps for endoscopic transnasal surgery on
the maxillary sinus. Am J Rhinol. 2003;17:311316.
3. Robey A, OBrien EK, Leopold DA. Assessing current technical limitations in the small-hole endoscopic
218