BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Egbert Burchardt
Page 2
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
> 35 in diamonds
> 45 in iron ore
> 30 in hard rock
12 copper
11 gold
3 platinum
5 molybdinum
Page 3
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
HPGR References
References:
Gold Corp. Minera
Penasquito
POLYCOM 24/17
2 x 2,500 kW
> 2.000 tph
Page 4
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
HPGR References
References:
FMI PTI Grasberg (2)
Northam Platinum
UG2 Plant
Anglo Ferrous Minas Rios Project (3)
Page 5
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
HPGR References
References:
Anglo Platinum Mogalakwena North
Page 6
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
HPGR References
References:
FMI - Cerro Verde (4)
Newmont / Anglo
Boddington (4)
Moly Mines
Spinefex Ridge (3)
Vale Salobo (2)
Gindalbie Metals
Karara Magnetite (2)
Page 7
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 8
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
A * b /
DWI
Page 9
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
16 kWh/t
4 kWh/t
A * b = 80
Page 10
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 11
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
A* b = 28 to 75
suggests
energy input
between 5 to 15 kWh/t
throughput
+/- 50 % variation
without blending!
Deposit with extreme variation of
A * b Parameters
Page 12
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
HPGR Circuit
Sensitivity of
HPGR circuits
treating various ores
Page 13
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Selection of
Roll dimensions and speed
based on specific throughput
in order to achieve required throughput
Page 14
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 15
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 16
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 17
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 18
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
if
HPGR discharge varies between
at a screen efficiency of
55 70 % < 6 mm
90 %
Page 19
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
< 2 mm
< 11 mm
< 6 mm
Page 20
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 21
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 22
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
HPGR Circuits
Page 23
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 24
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Throughput Control
Belt feeders control
filling level of HPGR
Motor speed is adjusted
according to level
in BM screen bin
Page 25
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Scoping Study
Page 26
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Assumptions
Page 27
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 28
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
HPGR Technology
Page 29
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Throughput:
Tyre lifetime
Page 30
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Throughput:
Tyre lifetime
Page 31
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Throughput:
Tyre lifetime
Page 32
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 33
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 34
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 35
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 36
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 37
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Daily Production Rates: Design 108,000 tpd Achieved average 113,000 tpd
Page 38
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 39
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
left
centre
right
Page 40
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 41
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Page 42
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Challenge:
How to get 6,000 hours roll life
on an extremely abrasive ore??
Page 43
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Abrasiveness of Ore
&
Wear Protection Design
Page 44
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Ore Properties
mineralogy
hardness
HPGR wear index
grinding pressure
roll speed
Design
stud
composition
stud length
stud diameter
stud pattern
tyre properties
Page 45
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
ATWAL
abrasion testing unit provides HPGR wear index
Page 46
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
1996
2002
2004
Cerro Verde
since 12 2006
Freeport - Grasberg
since 05 2007
since 03 - 2008
Northam Platinum
since 05 2008
start up 2009
Vale Salobo
start up 2010
start up 2010
Page 47
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
k1:
k2:
wear index
Page 48
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Challenge:
How to get 6,000 hours roll life
on an extremely abrasive ore??
Outlook:
Design modifications indicate the
potential to achieve 6,000 hours!!
Page 49
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Summary
Succesful HPGR references are in operation.
Metallurgical performance of HPGRs met or
exceeded the design criteria.
Robust scale-up procedures are availabe.
HPGRs are more competitive than SAG Mills
for the comminution of hard ores.
The harder, the better for HPGRs!
HPGR wear protection is further advancing.
Page 50
BurchardtE
30 Apr 2009
Questions?