Average/s
232
297
334
401
551
Enzyme
Concentration/%
Rate Of Reaction/ s- x
10-
Avg Rate Of
Reaction/s- x 10-
10
4.17
4.31
4.48
4.31
3.29
3.62
2.21
3.37
2.96
3.02
3.00
3.00
2.49
2.51
2.48
2.49
1.82
1.80
1.48
1.81
Our results were fairly reliable as they were not too far off each other in the
repeat experiments. 10% and 8% concentrations were all relatively around the
(220 < x < 320) zone. But as expected the reactions began to take longer as the
enzyme concentrations got less and less. This is evident as 4% concentration
was between 398 and 403 seconds but 2% was between 545 and 557 seconds.
The rate of reactions were inverses of the times multiplied by a thousand.
So what does all this show?
This trend therefore corresponds to and seems to support our hypothesis, which
was, as the enzyme concentration gets higher there are more substrates
available for collision therefore the rate of concentration is higher
The experiment showed that , by reducing the enzyme concentration, there were
less active sites available for the substrate to occupy. It was enzyme limiting.
This meant that there would be far less collisions occurring, therefore increasing
the amount of time it took for the reaction to complete.
Also, it was possible that the reactions would reach an end point whereby the
substrate has been completely expelled. This would explain the solution being