Descriptive Statistics

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

90

,44

,500

X1ProfitMargin

90

-20,00

60,88

3,0209

9,60579

X2Likuiditas

90

-2,09

46487,55

847,1836

5518,12601

X3ROA

90

-42,00

151,42

3,3158

18,52959

X4Leverage

90

-,14

114,73

28,2343

35,70108

Valid N (listwise)

90

Descriptive Statistics
N

Minimum

Maximum

Statistic

Statistic

Statistic

Mean
Statistic

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Statistic

90

,44

,053

,500

X1ProfitMargin

90

-20,00

60,88

3,0209

1,01254

9,60579

X2Likuiditas

90

-2,09

46487,55

847,1836

581,66155

5518,12601

X3ROA

90

-42,00

151,42

3,3158

1,95319

18,52959

X4Leverage

90

-,14

114,73

28,2343

3,76322

35,70108

Valid N (listwise)

90

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square

Step 1

df

Sig.

Step

15,058

,005

Block

15,058

,005

Model

15,058

,005

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step
1

Chi-square
12,265

df

Sig.
8

,140

Iteration Historya,b,c
Iteration

-2 Log likelihood

Coefficients
Constant

Step 0

123,653

-,222

123,653

-,223

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 123,653
c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 2
because parameter estimates changed by less
than ,001.

Variables in the Equation

B

Step 1a

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

X1

-,033

,027

1,473

,225

,968

X2

,003

,002

1,414

,234

1,003

X3

-,001

,012

,007

,933

,999

X4

,015

,007

5,071

,024

1,016

Constant

-,811

,318

6,512

,011

,444

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: X1, X2, X3, X4.

Iteration Historya,b,c,d
Iteration

-2 Log likelihood

Coefficients
Constant

Step 1

X1

X2

X3

X4

111,032

-,668

-,027

,000

-,001

,017

110,354

-,717

-,032

,000

-,001

,018

110,094

-,722

-,032

,000

-,001

,018

109,959

-,724

-,033

,000

-,001

,018

109,822

-,728

-,033

,000

-,001

,018

109,136

-,755

-,033

,001

-,001

,017

108,597

-,809

-,033

,003

-,001

,016

108,595

-,811

-,033

,003

-,001

,015

108,595

-,811

-,033

,003

-,001

,015

a. Method: Enter
b. Constant is included in the model.
c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 123,653
d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 9 because parameter estimates changed by less
than ,001.

Case Processing Summary

N

Marginal
Percentage

,00

50

55,6%

1,00

40

44,4%

90

100,0%

Valid
Missing

Total

90
89a

Subpopulation

a. The dependent variable has only one value

observed in 89 (100,0%) subpopulations.

Model Fitting Information

Model

Model Fitting

Likelihood Ratio Tests

Criteria
-2 Log

Chi-Square

df

Sig.

Likelihood
Intercept Only

123,653

Final

108,595

15,058

Goodness-of-Fit
Chi-Square

df

Sig.

Pearson

86,909

84

,392

Deviance

108,595

84

,037

,005

Likelihood Ratio Tests

Effect

Model Fitting

Likelihood Ratio Tests

Criteria
-2 Log

Chi-Square

df

Sig.

Likelihood of
Reduced Model
Intercept

115,556

6,961

,008

X1

110,294

1,700

,192

X2

114,552

5,957

,015

X3

108,602

,007

,933

X4

113,855

5,260

,022

The chi-square statistic is the difference in -2 log-likelihoods between

the final model and a reduced model. The reduced model is formed
by omitting an effect from the final model. The null hypothesis is that
all parameters of that effect are 0.

Parameter Estimates
Ya

Std. Error

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

95% Confidence Interval for Exp(B)

Lower Bound

,00

Upper Bound

Intercept

,811

,318

6,512

,011

X1

,033

,027

1,473

,225

1,033

,980

1,090

X2

-,003

,002

1,414

,234

,997

,992

1,002

X3

,001

,012

,007

,933

1,001

,977

1,025

X4

-,015

,007

5,071

,024

,985

,971

,998

a. The reference category is: 1,00.

Classification
Observed

Predicted
,00

1,00

Percent Correct

,00

36

14

72,0%

1,00

16

24

60,0%

57,8%

42,2%

66,7%

Overall Percentage

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value

Internal Value

non financial distress

financial distress

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa

N
Included in Analysis

Selected Cases

Missing Cases
Total

Unselected Cases
Total

Percent
90

100,0

,0

90

100,0

,0

90

100,0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number

of cases.

Model Summary
Step

-2 Log likelihood

108,595a

Cox & Snell R

Nagelkerke R

Square

Square
,154

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 9 because

parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

,206