Although there was a failure by the experts to anticipate the decline, there has been no
divergent hypothesis shortages that try to explain the crime drop rate. One explanation that is
frequently used is the innovative policing principal. Increased imprisonment is also another
explanation that is frequently attribute to drop in crme rate, market for cocaine, crack, tougher
gun control laws, the aging of the population, Increase in number of police and strong
economy are also other factors (Becker, Gary, 1968).
Legalizing abortion was also another factor that helped with the crime also reduction
following the 1973 U.S Supreme Court Roe v. Wade which even though seems like an
unlikely crime reduction source in the 1990s, but a body of evidence that is still growing
suggests that legalized abortion plays an important role in explaining a two decade later fall of
crime rate two premises can be used to explain this underlying theory mainly the there is a
Change in demographics also helped in the reduction of crime this can be explained by
reviewing the baby boomers aging which represents a significant change in the demographics.
There is a relatively low rate for criminal victimization and offending among the elderly,
people over the age of 65 in 2001 had per arrest capita level an approximately one- fiftieth
percent as compared to 15-19 year olds. In 1997 by using NCVS data, Perkins reported that
those over the age of 65 experienced higher victimization rates for seriously violent crime
which were was one-tenth lesser than that of teenagers. This analysis is given that the elderly
population level increased during the 1990s, and it shows that an expected demographic
driven decline would possibly occur. Their strategies involved enforcement increase on
activities they considered a nuisance like using technology and panhandling aggressively to
effectively identify common crime hotspots, other implemented changes they implemented
The 1980s increase in the use of capital punishment in the United States
saw a total number of 117 prisoners put to death that number significantly
quadrupled from the 1990s to 478.This methods effectiveness as a deterrent has
been a prolonged debate currently other early evidence have argued in favor of
this effect. The Ehrlich findings reviewed by many critics have been found to be
sensitive and only exhibiting minor changes in their application, other recent
studies from the 1990s have incorporated data that have a tendency of having
deterrent and divergent series of effects.
Lessons that Zimring identified from the United States crime drop have
included facts like most people never realizing things like the city experience
exhibited most of the dominant assumptions found in modern America these
include presumptions like for the crime rate to decrease first there has to be
strategies put in place to address unemployment, poverty, and drug use, majority
of the population considering crime as wrong, and that there also has to be
majority movement of the minorities out of the city centers, and in addition it
entails a necessity for throwing many people in jails which is a misguided
concept(Zimring FE: 2012).
He also learnt from the period that just like NewYork other urban areas can
also make giant strides towards addressing their high crime rates without making
any major changes in their ethnic and racial profile; they can achieve this without
lowering their unemployment and poverty levels which they can achieve without
In addition he explains that all Americans whether in suburbs or in cities, whether poor
or rich, can be considered safe today,by casting an unerring and critical eye on current
explanations, he states that recent and long-lasting generated theories fall short of the 1990s
crime rate drop. Zimring also learned that economic and imprisonment as independent factors
did not have any major roles in the reduction of crime rate as many theorists suggest.
He also learns that there are for future progress there has to be a constant review of the
divergent factors that combine to facilitate the crime level decline and according to him the
crime rate do not need any structural or social changes and effecting smaller shifts in the
necessary policies can make a major difference to the crime rates. There is also a lesson to be
learnt from the significant reductions in crime rates like in places like New York where there
has been a recorded of crime drop twice this review according to the national average shows
that there is still significant room for other cities to replicate this result of successful crime
decline.
Reference
Becker, Gary (1968) Crime and Punishment:An Economic Approach.Journal of Political
Economy, print
David, Henry, ZdenekDytrych, Zdenek Mate-jcek and VratislavSchuller.(1988).Born
Unwanted:Developmental Effects of Denied Abortion.NewYork:Springer
David,A, (2002) Review of theEconometric Evidence on the Effect of Capital Punishment,
Journal of Socio-EconomicsSpring/Summer
Zimring FE: (2012)The City that Became Safe: New Yorks Lessons for Urban Crime and its
Control. London: Oxford University Press; PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Aebi MF, Lande A: (2008) Crime trends in Western Europe according to official statistics
from 1990 to 2007. In The International Crime Drop: New Directions in Research. Edited by
van Dijk JJM, Tseloni A, Farrell G. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Van Dijk JJM: (2008)The World of Crime. London: Sage.