GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION
Effective procurement practice is becoming an increasingly important focus for Local Government in Victoria.
Councils are working on improving their procurement performance to drive cost savings, improve probity,
deliver improved outcomes, and meet their broad range of council objectives. A key element of procurement
practice that is now coming under increasing scrutiny is post-award contract management.
This reflects a new focus on contract management across both the public and private sectors, as
organisations shift from a view of contracts as simply pieces of paper to living documents that need close
carefully planned management.
There is now broad recognition that the growing emphasis on agreeing deals has not always flowed into
consistent and effective management of post-award contracts. Major service contracts for example are not
always routinely reviewed to confirm if they are delivering value for money. As increasing priority is given to
procurement, insufficient attention is still being paid to the on-going management of contracts. Yet many of
the risks and costs associated with contracts can occur during the post-award contract management period.
This is particularly relevant for Councils, who often have a wide range of staff managing a diverse and
complex range of contracts, dealing with everything from waste management and road construction to
stationery and IT. By committing to developing a sound, consistent and effective approach to contract
management across their organisation, councils can not only better manage risks, they can reduce costs and
significantly improve outcomes.
GUIDELINES STRUCTURE:
Section A Contract Management Principles - Establishing the principles and setting the
foundation for effective contract management
1. What is Contract Management?
2. Contract Management and the Procurement Life-cycle
3. Organisational requirements for contract management
Section B - The Contract Management Procedures Manual - The practical application of effective
contract management principles
1. Planning for Effective Contract Management
a. Contract Establishment
b. Determining the Contract Management Approach
c. Identifying and Managing Risks
2. Contract Management Practice
a. Contract Mobilisation
b. Contract Administration and Record Keeping
c. Contract Management Roles and Responsibilities
d. Managing Relationships
e. Performance Management
f. Contract Monitoring
g. Negotiating Contract Variations
h. Managing Contract Disputes
i. Ethical Business Conduct and Conflict and Interest
j. Contract Completion
SECTION A
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPLES
Tender and
quotation
process
Evaluation
of offers and
negotiation
Contract
award
Contract
management
Planning phase
Contract establishment
Contract admin
Contract management roles
and responsibilities
Managing relationships
Performance management
Negotiate contract variations
Managing contract disputes
Ethical business conduct
Contract completion
The contract management phase of the procurement life cycle often receives the least attention and effort
until problems arise. However, if we take a typical three-year IT services project and look at the elapsed time
by phase, a clear picture is painted of the importance of the contract management phase and the need for
both parties to devote appropriate effort and resources.
2-3 months
1 month
1-2 months
1 month
36 months
Planning
Requesting Offers
Evaluation and
Negotiation
Award
Contract Management
Figure 3: Profile of time against Procurement Lifecycle Phase for a typical three year IT services project
The importance of the contract management phase is further reinforced when we consider where the output
of the procurement project occurs the delivery of the required goods or services.
This is true for the Council, but also for the supplier, because performance in this phase may have an
influence on whether future business will be won or lost. Not only performance in terms of delivering the
required goods or services in full, on time and to specification, but also in terms of the relationship built with
the Council and the added value it delivers.
SECTION B
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE
a. Contract Establishment
Successful contract management is dependent on a number of steps being undertaken effectively during the
planning and contract establishment phases. Some of the key issues that will determine the long term success
or failure of contract management include:
Planning issues such as the type of specifications, the number of contractors, the length of contracts and
the role of sub-contractors should be included in procurement planning.
Specification development Clear, well written specifications that incorporate measurable KPIs, and allow
suppliers to respond confidently in their tenders can reduce the risk of contract disputes, cost blow-outs
and poor outcomes.
Style of the procurement process The relationship that is developed during contract establishment will
flow into the contract management phase.
Realistic contracts Contracts where one party feels particularly disadvantaged by the terms and
conditions or other commercial arrangements can create problems during the contract management
stage.
Contract transition planning Well planned and executed processes will ensure that expectations, roles
and responsibilities are clear in the transition to the contract management phase.
Sources of Risk
Examples of Risk
Supplier performance
Stakeholder relationships
Risks should be considered and assessed as part of the preparation of the Contract and Supplier Management
Plan. For contracts with more significant risks, a Risk Mitigation Plan may need to be developed and
periodically reviewed and updated throughout the life of the contract.
Where a contract is to be managed by multiple Council departments , a plan may assist with coordination
among team members and stakeholders. Issues discussed above should be addressed by the plan or
checklist developed to guide contract management.
Action
One off
No
Commercial
Health &
Safety
Operational
Performance
Relationship
Yes
On-going
How often
Who is
responsible
The table below outlines typical roles and responsibilities split between procurement and the operational
contract manager:
Area of Responsibility
Procurement Role
Supplier Management
Continuous Improvement
d. Managing Relationships
Relationship management underpins successful contract management. A sound basis for the relationship
should have been established in the earlier stages of the procurement lifecycle. If the nominated Council
manager is new to the contractual arrangement, efforts will need to be made to understand the relationship
that exists between the Council and the supplier. It is particularly important for the manager to understand
the background to the relationship and be aware of any problems or issues that have arisen at earlier stages
of the procurement process.
From a Council perspective, one of the key elements in relationship management is deciding on the
appropriate type of relationship based on where the category and the contract sit in its supplier portfolio
analysis. Not all supplier relationships will be the same.
The type of contract management relationship with any given supplier depends on the following:
Number of suppliers in the market place
The type of relationship the Council wants with a supplier long term strategic vs. transactional
The good or service to be provided and complexity of requirements
Duration of contract
It is important to establish and maintain a constructive relationship with the Supplier and have regular
communication. Providing positive and constructive feedback will assist in maintaining such a relationship.
A typical approach to managing relationships adopted in a long-term services contract is outlined below:
Overall responsibility
Each party nominates one person with the appropriate skills and experience
as its representative to be responsible for the co-ordination and
management between the parties over the life of the contract.
Relationship management is focused on keeping the relationship between the two parties open and
constructive, resolving or easing tensions and identifying problems early.
Relationships should always be managed in a professional manner and be based on cooperation and mutual
understanding taking into account the need for probity and ethical behaviour.
e. Performance Management
Performance management ensures that the contract is well understood by both parties. A performance
management framework should be established that provides a comprehensive framework with agreed
targets for the supplier to meet or exceed.
The key components of a performance management framework will include:
Standards, including the specification of goods or services are documented in a clear and measurable
way;
Clearly established measures (KPIs) are established that relate directly to the standards set in the original
contract;
A regular review meeting schedule that allows discussion of the suppliers performance and encourages
feedback and problem solving;
Documented processes to address issues raised and set actions, targets and responsibilities of
improvement;
Incentives and sanctions that allow the contract manager to motivate the supplier;
Termination provisions that allow the contract to be terminated in the event of sustained poor
performance;
Relationship management processes that encourage parties adopt a constructive approach to problem
resolution rather than an adversarial one.
Performance management must be undertaken throughout the life of the contract and for all contracts,
whether straightforward or complex. Along with performance indicators and standards, arrangements for
monitoring and assessment should have been set out and agreed in the contract along with action that would
result from non-performance.
f. Contract Monitoring
Contract monitoring focuses on collecting and analysing information to provide assurance to the Council that
progress is being made in line with agreed timeframes and towards providing the contract deliverables. Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs) should be clearly set within the contract and then measured, reported and
monitored on a regular basis.
Regardless of how the contract monitoring is performed, accountability for accepting contract deliverables
remains with the Council. Information provided by a supplier for monitoring purposes should be reviewed and
audited, as necessary, to ensure its accuracy and reliability. It can also often be tested by capturing feedback
from end-users regarding the quality of the goods and services they have received.
It is important to focus monitoring activity on key deliverables; very detailed monitoring can be both costly
and unnecessary and unduly shift the focus away from achieving contract outcomes. This may mean
establishing priorities for what will be measured at specific time intervals. Collecting too much information
is also costly and the Council may not have the resources to analyse it to assess performance
adequately.
The following case study discusses a situation involving too many performance indicators.
The Contract Manager also has responsibility for ensuring that council complies with its responsibilities under
the contract. The success of the contract for example may depend on it being used exclusively by all council
buyers. This will require regular monitoring of internal compliance.
Details of areas that need to be monitored include:
Specific goods or services provided on time to the required quality;
Client or user satisfaction;
Performance against contract requirements;
Invoicing and payments; ; and
Council contract compliance.
g. Negotiate Contract Variations
Provisions to allow and regulate reasonable contract variations should be a standard feature of all contracts.
The ability to vary the contract should be controlled by the Council and should only occur in defined
circumstances. It is accepted practice for the variation mechanism to provide for variations to be agreed
between the Council and the Supplier in writing through a written formal amendment of the contract. A
sample contract variation form is shown in Appendix 4.
Any proposed variations should be assessed to ensure that they do not breach legislation, procurement policy
and financial delegation levels. The reasons for the variation should be clearly documented. A clearly
understood governance structure should be in place to ensure variations are approved and signed off
independently of the Contract Manager. Procurement should be involved in negotiating significant variations.
Variations should not be used to mask poor performance or serious underlying problems and the effect on
original timeframes, deliverables and value for money should be assessed. If the effects are significant,
senior management and other stakeholders may need to be consulted and/or advised.
Changes to contractual arrangements have the potential to affect the scope and viability of the contract for
either or both parties and making substantive variations to a contract will require some of the actions and
issues involved in developing the original contract. They should therefore be planned accordingly. Councils
should be alert to the risk that multiple changes made to a contract over a period of time may re-shift the
overall allocation of contract risk or transfer particular risks to the Council.
A variation is a formal amendment to the terms and conditions within or outside the intent of the Contract. A
variation is a change to the original scope of work which has been agreed by both parties. The effect of
the variation will have implications on time, cost and quality.
Variations may include the following to Contract will be required for the following:
Change in scope of work (positive and negative)
Change in execution of the work
Change in resources or facilities required
Revision of rates
Extension of the duration of the contract
Settlement of a claim arising from the contract
The table below provides a checklist of the important areas to consider when managing contract variations:
Negotiation
Negotiating between the Council and the Supplier is the most common approach to resolving
disagreements and disputes. The intention of the negotiation is to reach a mutually acceptable
solution, where both sides consider they have gained the best possible result in the
circumstances. It is important that one party does not consider they have been unduly
pressured to agree to a particular solution as a result of the negotiation as this can lead to an
escalation or reappearance of the dispute at a later stage.
Mediation
Mediation involves the use of a neutral third party to assist in resolving the dispute. The
mediator does not impose a decision on the parties in the way a court or arbitrator does, but
instead seeks to help the parties resolve the dispute themselves. Mediation is usually regarded
as a faster, less formal and less costly process than court proceedings or arbitration.
Arbitration
The aim of arbitration is to obtain a final and enforceable result without the costs, delays and
the formalities of litigation. Arbitration proceedings are private, can be held at a mutually
convenient time and the actual proceedings are less complex than litigation.
Litigation
Litigation is the act or process of contesting a lawsuit or seeking redress through the courts. It
can be an expensive and time consuming procedure and is generally taken when other
avenues of dispute resolution have not been successful or are not available. Other approaches
to resolving disputes or Supplier defaults should therefore be considered prior to litigation.
j. Contract Completion
The most common way a contract ends is where each party performs according to the terms of the contract,
that is, the contract is discharged through due performance. Contracts for the provision of goods may not
specify an end date but obligations under the contract are usually considered to be complete following the
delivery and acceptance of the last item(s) required under the contract. Acceptance implies that the goods
delivered have met the agreed standards.
Contracts for the provision of services may specify an end date when all contract deliverables have to be
provided. The contract ends through due performance if the services are delivered in line with contract
standards by the due date. In both goods and services contracts, contract closure should be completed as
soon as possible after all obligations have been met.
Steps and related tasks to be considered in completing the contract are set out in the table below.
Verify all contractual obligations have been successfully met. This can include the need to:
Review the statement of contract deliverables to ensure that goods or services have met contract
requirements
Arrange for the return of all required documents, material, information and records used or generated
during the contract that are the property of the Supplier
Arrange the return of all equipment or other goods provided to the Supplier and check that it is in a
satisfactory condition
Ensure to the extent possible, that any issues that may result in a claim against the Council are resolved
Return any financial and other guarantees and securities, including any deeds to the appropriate party
Record any intellectual property rights, including licences and the delivery by the Supplier of all material
expressions, information embodying intellectual property rights, any relevant documentation, technical
data or reports in a form that enables access by the Council. Any instructions on the use of intellectual
property should also be noted
Make appropriate arrangements for the receipt and storage of material and documents returned by the
Supplier.
Make all final payments payable under the contract.
Make arrangements in regard to warranties available under the contract.
Ensure all access rights or arrangements to premises and systems are terminated or revoked
Undertake post contract analysis, evaluation and reporting. This may include the need to:
evaluate contract performance
document lessons learned, and
update policies or procedures, where required.
SECTION C
APPENDICES
Definition
Act
Commercial in Confidence
e.g., prices,
Contract Management
Council Staff
suppliers
Probity
Within Local Government, the word probity is often used in a general sense
to mean good process. A Procurement process that conforms to the
expected standards of probity is one in which clear procedures that are
consistent with the Councils policies and legislation are established,
understood and followed from the outset. These procedures need to consider
the legitimate interests of suppliers and ensure that all potential suppliers are
treated equitably.
Category Management
Procurement
e-Procurement
Tender Process
advertisement,
tenderer.
Contract Value
Role
Responsibility
Procurement
Contract Manager
Supplier Details
High
Low
Leverage Items
Strategic Items
(MEDIUM)
(HIGH)
Bottleneck Items
(LOW)
(MEDIUM)
High
Risk
Consequence Likelihood
Risk Mitigation
Action
Responsible
Date
Actual Dates
Contract Name:
Contract No:
Contract Manager:
Pre-Commencement Stage
Actions
Who
Completed
Yes
No
Date Completed
1. Contract Documents
Prepare and Send Letter of Acceptance
PD
PD
PD
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
PD
PD
2. Transition Plan
Comment
Actions
Who
Completed
Yes
No
Date Completed
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM/RM
CM/RM
CM/RM
CM/RM
CM/ Con
CM/ Con
CM/Con
CM/Con
CM/ Con
CM/ Con
8. Contract Meeting
9. Induction Program
Comment
Who
Completed
Yes
No
Date Completed
CM
CM
CM / RM
CM / RM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
2. Contract Meetings
3. Payment Claims
Comment
Actions
Who
Completed
Yes
No
Date Completed
4. Performance Auditing
Conduct regular contractor performance
audits in accordance with specification
CM
CM
CM
CM/Con
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
5. Contract Extensions
Comment
Actions
Who
Completed
Yes
No
Date Completed
CM/Con
CM/Con
CM/Con
CM/Con
CM/Con
CM/PD/ Con
CM/Con
CM/Con
CM
CM
Comment
Contract Title:
Contractor:
Superintendent:
Variation number:
Date:
Yes
No
Description of variation:
Contract Dates:
Original Practical Completion
Date /
Council Response
Yes
No
Date
Procurement/Manager:
APPENDIX 5 REFERENCES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Please click here to view the document