United Nations
Needs
assessment
+
Baseline
data
Joint
analysis +
Mapping +
Ranking of
needs
Key
issues
Strategic
objectives
Country
strategy
Cluster
activities
ACTION
INFORMATION
Response
analysis
SOUTH SUDAN
Humanitarian Response Plan 2015 | Midyear Update
United Nations
Reference map
REFERENCE MAP
NORTH
DARFUR
Sennar
El Obeid
S U DA N
Ar Rahad
States, state capitals and major settlements in South Sudan
Umm
Ruwabah
Sinjah
Kosti
Tandalti
Abu
Zabad
An Nahud
Al Hawatah
Es Suki
WHITE
NILE
SENNAR
Gerger
Renk
SUDAN
Melut
Athidway
Radom
Marial-Baai
War-Awar
Raja
NORTHERN
BAHR
EL GHAZAL
Bentiu
Juaibor
WARRAP
WESTERN
BAHR EL GHAZAL
Thiet
Waat
Walgak
Ayod
Wanding
Akobo
JONGLEI
Kongor
Shambe
Yirol
Ezo
Tali
Amadi
WESTERN
EQUATORIA
Source Yubo
Naandi
Nzara
Li Rangu
Mundri
Boma
Muni
EASTERN EQUATORIA
Mangalla
Lopa
Juba
Maridi
Yambio
Torit
Pajok
Magwi
Pageri
Kajo-Keji
Nimule
Country Capital
State Capitals
D E M O C R AT I C
R E P U B L I C O F CPopulated
O N G place
O
Rivers
Isirio
Mungbere
Abyei region**
Andudu
International boundaries
Wamba
State boundaries
Bunia
Lakes
Arua
Undetermined boundary*
Watsa
Kapoeta
Narus
Liria
CENTRAL
EQUATORIA
Yei
Buta
Churi
Bor
Terekeka
Lui
Pochalla
Padak/Baidit
Awerial
Mvolo
Likuangole
Pibor
Akot
Tambura
ETHIOPIA
Duk Fadiat
Ganylel
Cueibet
Rumbek
Dajo
Abwong
Nyal
LAKES
Tonj
UPPER NILE
Maiwut
Nasir
Jikou
Adok
Warrap
Kuajiena
Atar
Leer
Kwajok
Wau
Malakal
Old Fangak
UNITY
Koch
Marial-Lou
Deim Zubeir
Tonga
Mankien
Gogrial
Kangi
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Mayom
Akun
Aweil
Kodok
Riangnhom
Turalei
Akuem
Boro Medina
Oriny
ABYEI
REGION
100
Gulu
200 km
Chukudum
Ikotos
U G A N DA
K E N YA
Lodwar
Lokichar
The information shown on this map does not imply official recognition or endorsement of the physical or
Lira Nations or other collaborative organizations.
political boundaries or feature names by the United
UN OCHA and affiliated organizations are not liable for damages of any kind related to the use of this
data. Users noting errors or omissions are encouraged to contact imusouth@un.org.
Masindi
Soroti
** Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan not yet determined.
** Final status of Abyei
region not yet determined.
Hoima
Kolowa
Contents
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Humanitarian dashboard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Changes in context and needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Strategic response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Cluster response plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Camp coordination and camp management (CCCM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Food security and livelihoods (FSL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Mine action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Non-food items and emergency shelter (NFI/ES) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Nutrition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Refugee response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Support cluster response plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Coordination and common services (CCS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Emergency telecommunications (ETC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Logistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Annex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Financial requirements per cluster 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
UNICEF/Holt
foreword
Stay, protect and deliver
At the outset of 2015, our pledge was to stand with civilians who were bearing the brunt of the
civil war: a conflict entering its second year and which came to a country ranking lower in terms
of human development than just about every other place on earth. Six months ago, we thought
that violence and suffering had peaked and that peace was on the horizon. We were wrong.
Political intransigence left peace ever more distant; war raged on and is leading to economic
collapse. The consequences for the 12 million people of South Sudan have been devastating
and outpaced aid agencies ability to keep up with the tide of human suffering.
As of mid-2015, almost 8 million people in South Sudan are food insecure. 4.6 million are
severely food insecure. 2.1 million people have had to flee from their homes. In half of the
country, one in three children are acutely malnourished and 250,000 children face starvation.
This is the situation which confronts the aid community, a group of non-governmental organisations and UN agencies committed to providing the best protection and assistance to people in
need, on time, based on the principles of humanity, impartiality and neutrality. We have been
tested in different ways, but in the overwhelming majority of cases we have managed to gain
access and provide life-saving aid to millions of people. We have managed to protect civilians
and to provide the basics to keep people alive and alleviate suffering. And increasingly, we are
working to ensure coherence between humanitarian action and development in key areas such
as agriculture, education, and health.
The political support that we have received from a broad coalition of countries, including those
that give resources, has been vital and heartening. Whilst the frustration and disillusionment at
the lack of progress in the peace talks rightly runs high, standing with our brothers and sisters
in South Sudan is the order of the day, both now and in the future.
This appeal the joint work of over one hundred aid agencies has been streamlined to take
account of peoples needs on the one hand and what the aid community can actually achieve in
a very tough environment, on the other. Our financial requirement now stands at US$1.63 billion
for 2015, of which donors already have generously put forward US$656 million. Resources are
urgently needed, including for air assets to facilitate rapid response missions, the delivery of
survival kits and to re-supply partners with a presence in deep field locations.
I cannot speak on behalf of the people of South Sudan, but I am certain they would thank you
for your support as do all of us in the aid community serving people in South Sudan.
Sincerely
Toby Lanzer
Humanitarian Coordinator
Introduction
Introduction
Humanitarian Dashboard
Absence of human development, violent conflict, and looming economic crisis are driving need.
Current figures
Displacement
Conflict
7.9m
0.26m
Economic crisis
Widespread malnutrition
* as of July 2015
SUDAN
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Aweil
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
Abyei
Region
!
Malakal
Bentiu
Malakal
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
Abyei
Region
SUDAN
! ! ! ! ! !
people to be assisted
4.6m
Humanitarian access
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
US$
required
for 2015
1.63bn
people
internally
displaced
1.5m
Bentiu
Aweil
Kuajok
Kuajok
ETHIOPIA
ETHIOPIA
Wau
Wau
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Rumbek
Bor
Rumbek
Bor
Relative severity
of needs
+
Accessibility
!
^
JUBA
Yambio
Yambio
Accessible
Accessible with
constraints prior to November 2014
Accessible with constraints
since November 2014
Torit
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
IDP locations
Hotspots
KENYA
UGANDA
Sources: OCHA, June 2015 (Relative severity of needs), April 2015 (IDPs)
20%
Serious
Alert
counties
assessed for
GAM and SAM
Lakes
Other states
26%
Dec
2013
Apr
Aug
1.6
Upper Nile
1.2
Unity
0.8
Jonglei
0.4
Malaria
72%
23%
Acceptable
1.51m
Central Equatoria
Watery
Diarrhea
40%
KENYA
UGANDA
Bloody
Diarrhea
5%
50
Critical
DRC
Jan-Oct 2014
14%
Very critical
Torit
!
^
JUBA
Apr
2015
Dec
2014
Seasonal events
in crisis-affected
states and population in IPC Phases 3 and 4 (in millions)
Seasonal
events
and food insecurity
Dry
season
Wet
season
Dry
season
Planting
season
Harvest
period
Growing
season
3.9
3.5
1.1
2.4
Apr
Phase 3 - Crisis
Seasonal
oods
Preposition
supplies
Seasonal
oods
Hunger
gap period
Mar
Wet
season
1.3
2.6
May
Jun - Aug
Phase 4 - Emergency
4.6
1.0
3.8
2.2
2.5
1.5
0.4
1.7
1.3
Sep
0.2
Oct - Dec
(Projected)
0.9
0.9
1.6
Jan - Mar 2015
(Projected)
Sources: FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission Reports 2010-14; IPC Alert South Sudan May 2015
2.9
Apr
2.8
0.6
3.6
2.2
May - Jul
(Projected)
Introduction
Strategic objectives
Strategic objective 1
Prioritize
rigorously
Strategic objective 2
Coordinate
action
Secure
access
Strategic objective 3
Scale
up
Capitalize
on seasons
Advocate
Planning trends
Cluster
4.6m
Revised requirements
$67.8 million
$32.3 million
Education
$41 million
Emergency telecommunications
$1.6 million
3.2m
2.3m
1.2m
1.2m
Food and
livelihoods aid 2011 2012
2013
2014
1.5m
$623.2 million
Health
500'
$93.3 million
Logistics
$114.2 million
Mine action
300'
New internally
displaced
2011 2012
$14.5 million
current
1.5m
200'
2013
263'
$65.5 million
Nutrition
2015
1.95m
2014
270'
2015
293'
$149 million
current
Protection
Refugee response
Refugees in
South Sudan
$241 million
262
80'
$60 million
$129.5 million
2012
2013
actual
2014
2015
projected
CCCM
Education
FSL
(food)
FSL
(livelihoods)
Health
NFI/ES
Nutrition
Protection
Refugee
response
4.6m
1.76m
1.1m
1.5m
772,500
332,585
4.1m
2.06m
757,400
4.6m
2.2m
988,500
293,600
293,600
264,800
WASH
7m
people
in need
6m
5m
people
to be
assisted
4m
3m
2m
people
reached
1m
1.5m
879,150
848,000
2m
450.000
197,890
4.6m
2.1m
1.1m
4.6m
3.5m
730,000
6.4m
3.5m
1m
UNICEF/Nesbitt
Changes
in Context
and Needs
4.6 MILLION
People facing crisis
or emergency levels
of food insecurity
Changes in context
and Needs
Economic downturn is compounding the consequences of conflict
Intensified violent conflict is destroying the viability of communities and generating new and
recurrent displacements of vulnerable populations.
Economic stress is generating inflation and shortages of critical goods and services.
Deepening austerity is further threatening publicly managed social services, including the
public health system.
Food insecurity, hunger and malnutrition are deepening and spreading geographically.
Aid agencies face both sharp increases in needs and significant constraints on humanitarian
action.
People across South Sudan are struggling to manage the consequences and implications of multiple crises: political, economic
and social. Even before the current crises, South Sudan was characterized by low human development indicators, nascent institutions, government austerity, fundamentally non-existent transport
infrastructure and a climate system that renders more than half of
the country physically inaccessible by road for six months of of the
year. In the face of appalling suffering, humanitarian efforts have
expanded and resulted in remarkable achievements. However, the
changing context is deepening existing vulnerabilities and generating new humanitarian requirements, some in areas where aid
agencies dont yet have operations.
Violent conflict
Between mid-December 2013 and end May 2015, more than 2
million people fled their homes as a result of violence, including
1.55 million people internally and 552,000 refugees in neighboring
states. In the absence of a viable peace agreement or respect for
the 23 January 2014 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement, conflict
has raged unchecked in many parts of Greater Upper Nile.
Fighting has affected a further 750,000 people, many of whom
had been displaced repeatedly by earlier violence. Their vulnerability is high, and, as the rainy season comes, people on the
move will be particularly vulnerable to seasonal flooding. The most
SUDAN
! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
Malakal
Aweil
Counties with the most severe needs are characterized by a lack of basic services coupled
with high food insecurity and displaced population. Several areas close to front lines fall into
this category. Some areas where there are few
displaced people, are mapped less severely
affected in this analysis, though other needs
may be high. As the indicators are proxies for
consequences of conflict, some counties are
assessed as severe due to a lack of basic
services.
Abyei
region
! ! ! ! !
!! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Bentiu
Kuajok
ETHIOPIA
Wau
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Rumbek
Yambio
Bor
^
JUBA !
Torit
KENYA
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
UGANDA
Introduction
Economic stress
Economic stress affects needs through rising food and commodity
prices, and, likely, reduced capacity for service delivery. Falling
domestic oil production, depressed global oil prices, poor
revenue controls and budgetary overspending has generated
inflation, a rapidly widening gap between the official exchange
Crisis Timeline
2013
December
15-31
Fighting starts in
Juba, spreads
to Jonglei, Unity
and U
pper Nile,
where people
flee their h
omes
and aid stocks
are looted
2014
January
2-10
Fighting breaks
out again in
Borand Bentiu,
International
Crisis Group
estimates death
toll is 10,000
people
23
Cessation
of hostilities
agreement signed
February
March
3
Aid agencies call
for US$1.27 billion
to assist 3.2
million people
7
First rains flood
the UNbase in
Juba, increasing
cholera risks
11
The Emergency
Relief Coordinator
declares a Level
3 emergency
19
Fighting breaks
out again in
Malakal
18
Fighting resumes
in Malakal
26
Over one million
people displaced
within or outside
South Sudan
April
4-17
Hundreds
die during a
massacre in
Bentiu and an
attack on the UN
base in Bor
28 Apr - 6 May
US and UN
officials visit Juba
to call for peace
May
5
Month of
Tranquility, which
is agreed by
conflict parties
9
Salva Kiir and
Riek Machar sign
agreements to
resolve the crisis
June
July
25
UN Security
Council calls food
security situation
worst in the
world
31
Cholera outbreak
largely contained
in Central
Equatoria
Introduction
8,000
865
6,000
August-Sept
6 Aug
Aid workers killed
in Maban County,
Upper Nile State
October
8
UN envoy on
sexual violence
warns rapes in
South Sudan is
the worst I have
seen in my almost
30 years in
dealing with this
issue
29
Bentiu town
attacked
580
415
375
4,000
2,630
1,230
1,015
3,190
3,435
3,400
Mar
2013
Jul
955
890
2,885
245
240
1,035
1,260
2,000
As a new nation emerging from decades of conflict, marginalization and underdevelopment, South Sudan lacked basic social
services even before the current crisis. Education indicators were
among the lowest in the world and have deteriorated further due
to the conflict since December 2013. Fewer than 10 per cent
of children finish primary school, less than 35 per cent of girls
participate in school and more than one million children and
adolescents are out of school. The conflict has forced a further
400,000 children out of school. Health outcomes are equally
poor and basic health coverage is limited. Diseases of epidemic
potential include cholera, measles, kala azar, hepatitis E, diarrheal diseases, acute respiratory infection, and malaria. Risk of
outbreak remains high, driven by displacement, poor sanitation
and lack of clean water. Capacities to manage these and other
health threats, such as HIV and AIDS and complications during
pregnancy are limited and diminishing. While the number fluctuates and is reported weekly, currently 214 health facilities out
of 410 (59 per cent) are no longer functional in Jonglei, Upper
Nile and Unity States. Country-wide, although solutions between
Government and development partners are under discussion,
a stock out of essential drugs from October 2015 is expected
to affect 1,400 health facilities, putting hundreds of thousands
of people, mostly children, at risk of dying from easily treated
diseases. Health partners will need to respond to the expected
increase in illness.
3,575
2,170
1,630
1,750
1,260
3,385
3,675
3,465
3,855
3,955
4,295
3,280
Stressed
Crisis
Emergency
2015
November
21
ASG Kyungwha Kang visits
South Sudan
and calls on all
parties to respect
their ceasefire
commitments
December
22
Intergovernmental
authority on
development
(IGAD) brokered
peace talks
adjourned
Jan-March
12 Feb
ERC Valerie
Amos and
UNESCO special
representative
Forrest Whitaker
visit South Sudan.
$529 million in
new funding
is pledged in
Nairobi, Kenya
to support
humanitarian
response in South
Sudan
April
2
HC calls for
freedom of
movement during
the planting
season
18
Humanitarian
assistance
suspended
in Akoka and
Fashoda
May
11
Aid organizations
withdraw from
parts of Southern
Unity due to
insecurity, cutting
off 300,000 from
aid
20
SecretaryGeneral strongly
condemns
escalated fighting
in South Sudan as
unacceptable
June
1
Secretary
General
condemns the
expulsion of
Deputy Special
Representative
of the Secretary
General and
humanitarian
coordinator
Toby Lanzer from
South Sudan
SUDAN
!
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Rumbek
Bor
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
^
!
JUBA
Torit
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
KENYA
UGANDA
Projected
food
security
IPC
phases, May
- July
2015
Malakal
Abyei
region
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Bentiu
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Yambio
ETHIOPIA
Wau
Kuajok
! ! ! ! ! !
Widespread malnutrition:
Malakal
Bentiu
Aweil
Nutrition classification
Acceptable
Alert
Serious
Critical
Very critical
Mapping needs
Abyei
region
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
Aweil
Kuajok
ETHIOPIA
Wau
Rumbek
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Bor
IPC phases
Yambio
No data
Minimal
Stress
Crisis
Emergency
^
!
Torit
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
KENYA
UGANDA
Sources:
FSL South
& IPC TWG,
MayIPC
2015Technical Working Group, June 2015
Source:
Sudan
SUDAN
heat map
Abyei
region
Bentiu
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
Malakal
Conflict
heat
mapdisplacement
Conflict
and
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Aweil
SUDAN
Kuajok
ETHIOPIA
Wau
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Aweil
Malakal
Abyei
region
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Bentiu
Kuajok
ETHIOPIA
Wau
Relative severity
of needs
+
Rumbek
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Relative severity
of needs
+
_
0
Bor
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
Source:
cluster,
May 2015 clusters, June 2015
Source:Nutrition
UNOCHA
and humanitarian
Bor
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
JUBA !
^
Torit
^
!
JUBA
Rumbek
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Torit
UGANDA
KENYA
KENYA
UGANDA
UNICEF/Nesbitt
Strategic
response
$1.633 BILLION
revised requirements
12 strategIC response
STRATEGic response
Coordinated action with resources prioritized to capitalize on the seasons, secure access and scale up
Achievements to date
The Strategic Response Plan (SRP) reflects the combined efforts
of the humanitarian community in South Sudan to identify the
humanitarian implications of crises and threats and to determine a coordinated and prioritized strategy to save lives, reduce
suffering and mitigate its impact on the livelihoods of the most
vulnerable populations.
The conflict that erupted in December 2013 rapidly escalated
humanitarian requirements while crippling humanitarian capabilities in the most affected areas, including Juba. After the first difficult months of the crisis, significant temporary surges of humanitarian resources translated into focused humanitarian action that
ultimately assisted 3.5 million people by years end. In 2014,
humanitarian organizations returned to many original areas of
operation, established static presence in new areas and innovated
with flexible, rapid response modalities. Donor partners responded
robustly to identified resource requirements. The risk of famine was
1.6 million
1.45 million
1.2 million
.5 million
Agriculture
inputs
Agriculture inputs
Livestock
support
Vegetable
inputs
Vegetable production
Fishing
gears
Livelihoods
(IGA)
Training, capacity building and small business support by humanitarian and development programmes
FSL
analysis
Jan
Feb
March
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
strategIC response 13
4.6 MILLION
People at crisis or
emergency levels of
food insecurity
population estimate
(Mid-year 2015)
! ! ! !
Unity
! ! ! ! ! !
Warrap
1.26m
0.96m
Jonglei
1.19m
WBeG
Lakes
0.36m
Western
Equatoria
Eastern
Equatoria
0.37m
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
ETHIOPIA
1.26m
0.97m
0.11m
7.9m people
projected to be at risk of
food insecurity by July 2015
(stressed, crisis
and emergency)
1.0m
! ! ! !
NBeG
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Upper
Nile
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Central
Equatoria
7.0m people
projected to be at risk of
food insecurity
by September 2015
(stressed, crisis
and emergency)
0.44m
KENYA
UGANDA
4.6m to be assisted
4.6 million
food / livelihoods
Abyei
region
! ! ! ! ! !
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
WBeG
0.82m
0.7m
Unity
NBeG
Warrap
0.55m
0.62m
Lakes
0.2m
3.5 million
water, sanitation,
hygiene
Upper
Nile
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
SUDAN
Jonglei
ETHIOPIA
2.2 million
protection
0.77m
0.63m
Western
Equatoria
0.01m
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
0.18m
Central
Equatoria
Eastern
Equatoria
0.15m
KENYA
UGANDA
+ 1.95 million
internally
displaced
Protect
2.06 million
nutrition
1.76 million
health
879,150
camp management
610,000
urban
vulnerable
+ 293,600
refugees
772,500
NFIs/shelter
450,000
education
293,600
refugee response
Improve
14 strategIC response
Improving efficiency
Humanitarians have focused on sharpening divisions of labor,
capitalizing on complementarities and enhancing efficiency. In
2015, the humanitarian community utilized contributions from late
2014 and the dry season to procure and pre-position in deep field
locations a portion of key commodities in advance of the rainy
season, thereby realizing important savings in both terms of money
and eventual response times. Logistics bases with nearly 7,000 m3
in expanded storage capacities have been developed to facilitate
the pre-positioning of commodities. Humanitarian hubs have been
constructed in Bentiu, Bor, Malakal, and Mingkaman. These maximize efficiencies in common services and, within the PoC sites,
afford enhanced protection to humanitarian workers. The Camp
Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) cluster relies on a
system of county focal points drawn from agencies in static locations to improve tracking of displaced people and related humanitarian responses. The system has expanded to 19 counties in
Lakes, Jonglei, Unity, and Upper Nile. Other clusters are innovating
similar approaches. OCHA is supporting these and other partners
by coordinating from operational centers in key locations outside
state capitals where partners were already on the ground. The FSL
cluster pipeline for emergency livelihood kits has developed and
implemented a new information system that tracks inputs from the
earliest stage of procurement to delivery to beneficiaries.
Current figures
November 2014
as of June 2015
6.4 million
7.9 million
2.5 million
4.6 million
1.95 million
1.55 million
610,000
Urban Vulnerable
293,000
293,600
$1.8 billion
$1.633 billion
Revised
requirements
$67.8 million
$32.3 million
Education
$41 million
Emergency telecommunications
$1.6 million
Food security
and livelihoods
Health
Logistics
$623.2 million
$93.3 million
$114.2 million
Mine action
$14.5 million
$65.5 million
Nutrition
Protection
Refugee response
Water, sanitation and hygiene
$149 million
$60 million
$241 million
$129.5 million
strategIC response 15
#
#
#
Displacement locations
as of June 2015
SUDAN
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
# IDP location
Abyei
region
#
! ! ! ! ! !
#
#
#
###
#
## ###
##
#
#
#
##
# #
#
#
# #
#
#
##
#
Malakal
Bentiu
#
#
#
#
#
## #
#
#
# # #
#
#
# #
#
######### # #
#
# #
#
#
Aweil
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
# #
#
##
#
#
###
# ##
## #
## #
## # #
Kuajok
##
# #
###
#
#
#
# #
#
ETHIOPIA
#
Wau # #
#
#
#
##
### #
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
##Rumbek
#
# ##
##### # # #
# #
#
##Bor
##
#
# ##
#
#
#
##
#
#
Yambio
^
JUBA !
#
#
Torit
#
#
#
DEMOCRATIC
KENYA
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
#
#
UGANDA
Survival kits
Following recent clashes in Unity and Upper Nile states,
up to 750,000 people have been cut off from aid, without
access to food, shelter, drinking water, health care and
protection. Some 291 aid workers from 27 agencies were
relocated out of the area, as aid agencies compounds
were damaged and relief supplies looted.
The delivery of survival kits is a quick, flexible and innovative approach to provide a minimum level of assistance
to affected people in locations that cannot be reached
through other approaches, including mobile, rapid, and
static response modalities. Some 30,000 kits are expected
to be delivered in phase one.
Each survival kit weighs 9 Kg, is designed for a household
of five, and contains high energy biscuits, a fishing kit,
vegetable seeds, oral rehydration salts, water purification
tablets, 2 collapsible jerry-cans, 2 mosquito nets, and a
kitchen set. Kits are distributed from helicopters following
appropriate security clearances, supported by staff on
the ground.
16 strategIC response
Aid agencies are planning to provide life-saving assistance, especially safe drinking water, access to sanitation, nutrition monitoring
and treatment, livelihoods assistance, and public health support.
Only with an end to the fighting, and the economic and social
stability that follow, can millions of South Sudanese live in safety
and dignity.
Responding to needs
Aid agencies are focused on gathering information, data and analyses, including food security and nutrition surveys in urban areas.
120
2,174
MEB (Food+Non-food)
1,847
115
1,618
110
1,332
105
1,035
881
100
95
Wau
Jan-15
Juba
Feb-15
South Sudan
Mar-15
Apr-15
286
327
Jan -15
Apr -15
154
Apr -14
Source:
FAO,FEWSNET,
FEWSNET
and
WFP2015
25th May 2015
Source: FAO,
WFP
, 25 May
UNICEF/Nesbitt
Cluster
response
plans
879,150
people to be assisted
848,000
people reached
$22.1 million
funds secured
$67.8 million
revised requirements
$77
projects
Government partners
Relief and Rehabilitation Commission
Key achievements
yyExpanded the County Focal Point system
to 19 counties total
1. T
he number of people on the move within the country due
to conflict and floods will be 1.95 million in 2015 including
returnees.
2. B
ased on the current population in the PoCs and other settlements, it is estimated that the total number of displaced
people living in the PoCs and other settlements will increase
to 300,000.
3. T
he cluster will monitor the living conditions of up to 45 per
cent displaced people living in various host communities.
4. T
he projected number of stranded foreign nationals to be
assisted will decrease to 500.
Cluster coverage
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Malakal
Upper Nile
Abyei
region
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Northern
Bahr el
Ghazal
Bentiu
Aweil
Kuajok
ETHIOPIA
ETHIOPIA
Warrap
Wau
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Unity
Jonglei
Western Bahr el Ghazal
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Counties targeted
by CCCM
IDPs per county
No IDPs reported
1 - 10,000
10,001 - 25,000
25,001 - 50,000
50,001 - 100,000
100,001 - 135,000
Possibilities for IDPs in the future
Rumbek
Lakes
Bor
Western Equatoria
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
THE CONGO
Eastern Equatoria
Central
Equatoria
! JUBA
^
Torit
UGANDA
UGANDA
KENYA
KENYA
Strategy to respond
yyContinuous
yyDevelop
yyRoll
yyManage humanitarian hubs in displacement sites and settlements in Bor, Bentiu, Malakal, and Mingkaman.
yyAccountability
19
Education
Changes in needs
2 million
people in need
450,000
people to be assisted
male: 171,000 / female: 216,000
197,890
people reached
$21.7 million
funds secured
$41 million
revised requirements
$91
32
projects
Government partners
Relief and Rehabilitation Commission
Key achievements
yy65,700 children (40 per cent of
target)
are accessing Education in Emergencies
target),
trained in psychosocial support, and
referral mechanisms for protection,
nutrition, and health
Strategy to respond
The existing education strategy focuses on providing free education, psychosocial support and meaningful activities in protective
environments to displaced children and youth, and to the host
communities receiving them, in Greater Upper Nile.
The escalated conflict does not affect the clusters core strategy
so much as the geographic areas of intervention. The cluster
had a relatively strong presence in southern Unity, which has
been severely disrupted by the recent conflict. Activities in the
second half of the year will focus on resuming services to those
displaced from southern Unity in any accessible locations they
return or displace to, including PoC sites.
The cluster initially targeted only one third of people in need. Should
populations in southern Unity and Upper Nile continue to be inaccessible, there is a large case-load of children and young people
in geographic areas which were de-prioritized in favour of the most
acutely affected areas now inaccessible due to conflict, but which
continue to host significant displaced people in need of emergency
education (for example several counties in Lakes State). Existing
partner presence in such locations will be scaled up.
While maintaining the core focus on formal and non-formal education, cluster projects will also incorporate activities that can provide
some short term support to those suffering under increased
economic pressure and food insecurity, including allowances for
volunteer education in emergencies facilitators in areas where
teachers are not paid salaries, vocational education for adolescents, emergency school feeding, and, in areas where schools
have been closed due to damage, support for school rehabilitation.
The perpetration of atrocities against children documented
in recent conflict episodes highlights the continuing need for
teachers and education volunteers to be trained in psychosocial support. The cluster will capitalize on the strong suite of
psychosocial support, life skills and functional literacy materials
developed with UNESCO for education in emergencies in South
Sudan, and training of teachers and volunteers on education in
emergencies, psychosocial support, school management and life
skills throughout the rainy season.
The impact of the crisis on the education system means that the
cluster must adjust its strategy to not only meet immediate needs
but also to adapt to an ongoing crisis. The impetus is therefore on
partners to:
a)
Ensure that the quality of education in emergencies is as
strong as possible, including an initiative in the second half
of 2015 to audit and standardize the quality of education in
emergencies training.
b) Continue and strengthen linkages between emergency-initiated learning spaces with development initiatives.
c)
Consistently place the ownership of education in emergencies initiatives in the hands of communities e.g. training and
forming mobile community-based education in emergencies
teams, emergency school management committees and youth
committees into whose stewardship temporary learning spaces
will be transferred.
In light of the likelihood of continued need, the education pipeline
must be topped up now, both to cover the rest of 2015, and to
ensure there is no break over the end of the calendar year, which
is a crucial moment for pre-positioning and distributing education supplies at the return of the dry season and in preparation
for the 2016 school year. Simultaneously, partners are exploring
less resource-heavy and logistically burdensome ways to meet
ongoing needs for education supplies, including local procurement and printing.
SUDAN
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!!
! !
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
Northern Aweil
Bahr el
Ghazal
Unity
!!
Abyei
region
!!
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
Bentiu
Malakal
Upper
Nile
35%
13%
Kuajok
Warrap
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Western Bahr
el Ghazal
Wau
Jonglei
2%
1%
ETHIOPIA
ETHIOPIA
36%
Rumbek
Lakes
5%
Bor
Western Equatoria
Percentage of schools
25% occupied by armed actors
or displaced people
Percentage of children under 18 yrs
who are enrolled in schools for 2014
3 - 5%
6 - 15%
16 - 25%
Sources: Education cluster, May 2015
4% JUBA
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
Eastern Equatoria
!
^
Central
Equatoria
4%
Torit
UGANDA
UGANDA
KENYA
KENYA
21
Food security
and livelihoods (FSL)
4.6 million
people in need
Key achievements
yy1.15 million people reached with food
assistance
2.1 million
1.2 million
livelihoods assistance
3.5 million
1.15 million
414,180
730,000
$176.7 million
funds secured
$623.2 million
revised requirements
$178
71
projects
Changes in needs
Deepening food insecurity is a result of conflict and insecurity,
limited market functionality, high food prices caused by fastrising inflation and depreciation of the local currency, diminishing
purchasing power, depletion of household food stocks and high
cost of living.
In April overall food insecurity rose to 7.7 million (IPC Phase 2, 3,
and 4) and is expected to further increase to 7.9 million people
between May and July, with 4.6 million of these at crisis or emergency levels. Those people at stressed levels of food insecurity
(level 2) cannot sustain their livelihoods or meet their food needs
without engaging in negative coping strategies.
Renewed fighting in several areas in the Greater Upper Nile States
has caused further population displacements during the critical
time of planting, The loss of yet another harvest will contribute
further to food insecurity In the affected areas.
Finally, reduced oil revenues is creating economic pressures that
are impacting urban livelihoods. Staple food prices hikes have
driven a 40 per cent rise in the minimum expenditure of households on food and non-food items since January. Wage increases
are not keeping pace with the rising cost of living, while market
dependency is increasing towards the lean season and is higher
than in comparison to last year. Data collected in April suggests
that some 610,000 people in urban areas, or 25 per cent of the
urban population, may already be affected. Half of these are in
Juba and Wau. This number is likely to increase as needs deepen,
giving rise to a new urban humanitarian need.
Government partners
Food assistance will cover 100 per cent of the emergency caseload (1,035,000), plus displaced people in PoCs (240,000),
refugee populations, Abyei, and those participating in the
Mingkaman cash voucher program.
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
Bentiu
yyIPC
Malakal
Abyei
region
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Aweil
Kuajok
ETHIOPIA
Wau
Bor
IPC phases
No data
Minimal
Stress
Crisis
Emergency
Rumbek
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
^
!
Torit
KENYA
UGANDA
Strategy to respond
Food assistance will be provided to communities in IPC 3 and 4
based on needs and keeping seasonality and market access in
mind. The FSL cluster and the cash and market working group
are committed to exploring the feasibility of cash and voucher
programme where possible. Support to the poorest urban communities will be required. While unconditional food assistance in urban
areas may not be appropriate due to challenges of security and
targeting, the provision of food assistance through schools (school
meals, take home rations), church groups (for destitute populations
in particularly poor communities) and health institutions (ensuring
food supplies for families with malnourished or sick members),
offers opportunities to reach some of the poorest people in urban
areas. Livelihoods will also be supported through kitchen gardens
and small scale agriculture in urban and semi urban communities.
The cluster will also seek to re-assess the food security and nutrition situation and response in the Protection of Civilians sites and
displacement sites, where approximately 240,000 people are
currently residing. Depending on nutrition surveys and assessment, an appropriate strategy will be devised leading towards the
bolstering of nutrition services and transition from unconditional
monthly food assistance towards an appropriately targeted and/
or conditional response.
The FSL cluster will also target populations affected by the
renewed fighting in the Greater Upper Nile States. These populations have fled their land and will miss the planting season. The
FSL cluster will work in close collaboration with other clusters (NFI,
Nutrition, WASH, Protection) in order to provide lifesaving inputs to
those in need. Because of the foreseen increased food insecurity,
especially in the Greater Bahr el Ghazal, the target beneficiaries
of livelihood inputs will increase from 2.8 million people to 3.5
million people. Urban and semi urban areas will be included in the
response in order to avoid hunger and malnutrition. These interventions are particularly critical in the Greater Upper Nile region but
also in non-conflict states to avoid increased food deficits.
yyTimely
yyAnimal health and production through supporting mass livestock vaccination and veterinary support for the treatment of
livestock against diseases; supporting cold chain systems; and
human resource capacity.
yySupport
23
Health
Changes in needs
4.6 million
people in need
1.76 million
people to be assisted
1.1 million
people reached
$57.3 million
funds secured
$93.3 million
$53
revised requirements
31
projects
Government partners
Ministry of Health
Key achievements
yy1.1 million outpatient consultations in
vulnerable states
!! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
25% 25%
ETHIOPIA
Jonglei
50%
Wau
37%
Western Bahr
el Ghazal
55%
Rumbek
Lakes
53%
Bor
Western
Equatoria
Beneficiaries by gender
Female beneficiaries
Male beneficiaries
Others (gender unspecified)
7%
47%
91,332
7,054
55%
Upper Nile
54%
Warrap
Kuajok
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Bentiu
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Aweil
Malakal
46%
100%
45%
Unity
Abyei
Region
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Eastern
Equatoria
44%
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
Central
Equatoria
37%
19%
Torit
KENYA
UGANDA
Source: South
Sudan
Ministry
of Health,
May
2015
Source:
Health
Cluster,
May
2015
Strategy to respond
Health cluster objectives remain to:
disease outbreaks.
yyWASH
cluster: For effective disease control, work integration with the WASH cluster will continue to be emphasized
to prevent/respond to water and sanitation related diseases
including joint plans to respond to outbreaks.
25
Mine Action
Changes in needs
$7.3 million
funds secured
$14.5 million
revised requirements
projects
Government partners
National Mine Action Authority (NMAA)
Key achievements
yy1,782km of
yy2,485 items of
Mine accidents
41
82
Injured
Killed
63 110
85
23
77
7
66
5
45
18 28
31
15 15
37
19
16
7
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
9
2015
Strategy to respond
The objectives are to:
1. E
nable life-saving humanitarian operations through survey and
clearance of explosive remnants of war (ERW) including land
mines and cluster munitions, and education of humanitarians.
2. Contribute to the protection and free and safe movement of
civilians.
Hazard areas
!
SUDAN SUDAN
!
!
! Upper Nile
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!!
!Unity
!
37
! !! !
! Bentiu
!
!
!
! ! ! !!
!
!
!
!!
!!
Abyei
region
!!
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
! !
!!
!
!
!!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
Northern Aweil
!
!!
Bahr el
Ghazal
!
!
8
Western Bahr
el Ghazal
CENTRAL
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
REPUBLIC
13
Type of hazard
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
Kuajok
!! !
Warrap
!
!!
13
!!
Wau !
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! Malakal
! ! !!
!!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!! Jonglei
Rumbek
!
!!
!
!!
!
Lakes
!
140
!
!
!
ETHIOPIA
ETHIOPIA
!
!
!
!
!
Bor !
!
!
!!
!
!!
20 ! !
! !!
!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!! !!
!! !!
!
!
Western Equatoria
!
!!!
!
!
!
Eastern Equatoria
!
!
!
!!
! !!
!!! JUBA
!
52
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
^
!
!
!
!!!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
! !!
!!
Yambio
! !!!
!
!
Central
!
!!!
! !! !
!!
! !!!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!
Equatoria!
!! !
!Torit ! !
!! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!! !!
DEMOCRATIC
! !!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
DEMOCRATIC
!
!
!!! !!!
!
!
REPUBLIC
OF
!!
!
KENYA
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
REPUBLIC
OF
KENYA
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
THE CONGO
!
!
!
!
UGANDA
!
UGANDA
!
!
THE CONGO
!
321
182
Sources:
Mine Action
Source:
MineCluster
Action Cluster, June 2015
Internally displaced people in PoC sites and other displacement sites, communities hosting displaced people, refugees, aid
workers and peacekeeping personnel are direct beneficiaries of
mine clearance activities. Priority will be given to the most conflictaffected states.
27
people in need
male: 695,000 / female: 793,000
772,500
people to be assisted
male: 370,800 / female: 401,700
332,585
The cluster anticipates that in the coming months, new displacements will continue to force people to leave behind basic household items and shelter materials. Second, the cluster anticipates
that vulnerabilities will expand beyond the conflict displaced
to people in host communities who are facing poor livelihoods
opportunities and the effects of economic stress. Simultaneously,
the people in the Protection of Civillian sites will likely increase
with limited numbers exiting the PoCs, increasing the need for
shelter interventions.
The lack of markets, materials, access to cash and livelihoods, as
well as a shorter dry season (leading to the reduced availability of
shelter materials), will decrease the ability of both displaced and
host populations to cope with the crisis.
people reached
$22.1 million
funds secured
$65.5 million
revised requirements
$85
15
projects
Government partners
Ministry of Gender, Child, Social Welfare,
Humanitarian Affairs and Disaster Management;
Relief and Rehabilitation Commission
Key achievements
yy273,780 people (26 per cent of
target)
reached with NFI support directly
target)
planned preposition
locations reached
Strategy to respond
To respond to new displacements, the cluster will aim to assist
the people in two phases. The first will be aimed at providing
multi-sectoral survival kits for displaced people who are currently
residing in extremely volatile areas and cannot be served through
the static response or rapid and mobile response which entails
assessment, verification, distribution). These kits will consist of
FSL and nutrition support items as well as the most basic NFI
items such as mosquito nets and cooking pots, and will be more
quickly transportable due to their size and weight. Once the
displaced people are settled for the rainy season and less vulnerable to attack, the cluster will plan to provide them with more
robust assistance so that they can withstand the rainy season.
The focus will be the three most conflict-affected states.
To respond to poor markets, lack of access to cash, and poor
livelihoods, as well as the effects of a shorter dry season on host
populations, the cluster will move to target both host and displaced
communities on a much larger scale. The cluster will continue to
assess and respond on the basis of acute, life-threatening need
but these are expected to be much higher as peoples ability to
provide for themselves declines.
Response by county
SUDAN
Upper Nile
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
Abyei
region
Unity
!!
!!
!!
!!
! !
Malakal
!!
!
!
!
Bentiu
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
Northern
Bahr el
Ghazal
Aweil
Kuajok
Warrap
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
ETHIOPIA
Wau
Jonglei
Lakes
Response type
Bor
Non-food item
Emergency shelter
Number of IDPs
per county
Western Equatoria
No IDPs reported
Yambio
Eastern Equatoria
JUBA ^
JUBA
!
Central
Equatoria
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
Torit
UGANDA
KENYA
Sources: NFI & ES Cluster, May 2015, OCHA, 30 April 2015 (IDPs).
areas. The cluster will work with CCCM also on issues regarding
drainage and elevation to help improve the shelter conditions
and avoid flooding inside the shelters.
yyFSL: The cluster will work closely with FSL in the coming months
to better coordinate responses, including through the planning
yyProtection
yyWASH: The cluster will continue to work closely with the WASH
29
Nutrition
Changes in needs
4.1 million
people in need
2.06 million
people to be assisted
757,400
people reached
$45.8 million
funds secured
$149 million
revised requirements
$72
37
projects
Government partners
Ministry of Health
Key achievements
yy8 85,000 children (423,000 girls) screened
for acute malnutrition
yy87 per cent of
As of April 2015, the nutrition situation remained above the emergency threshold (defined as global acute malnutrition greater than
15 per cent), with 80 per cent of counties in Greater Upper Nile,
Warrap, and Northern Bahr el Ghazal at critical nutrition levels.
Lakes, Western Bahr el Ghazal, and Eastern Equatoria are classified as serious while Western Equatoria and Central Equatoria
are acceptable and alert status respectively. There were
slight improvements in Panyijiar (Unity), Akobo (Jonglei), and
Longuchuk (Upper Nile) counties, which transitioned from very
critical to critical nutritional status.
From May to July, the nutrition situation is projected to remain
above the emergency threshold in Greater Upper Nile, Warrap,
and in Northern Bahr el Ghazal the latter areas being particularly affected by the economic crisis due to high levels of market
dependence. Malnutrition rates are further aggravated by the
lean season, high food prices, and the increase in waterborne
illness during the rainy season. In addition, economic stress will
likely increase levels of need in urban areas.
MayJuly
2015
Area would likely be at least 1 phase worse
April 2015
SUDAN
SUDAN
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Rumbek
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Rumbek
JUBA !
^
Bor
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Bor
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
ETHIOPIA
Wau
ETHIOPIA
Yambio
Bentiu
Kuajok
Wau
Nutrition classification
Acceptable
Alert
Serious
Critical
Very critical
Aweil
Kuajok
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
Malakal
Bentiu
Aweil
Abyei
region
!
Malakal
! ! ! ! ! !
Abyei
region
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Torit
KENYA
Nutrition classification
Acceptable
Alert
Serious
Critical
Very critical
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
UGANDA
^
!
JUBA
Torit
KENYA
UGANDA
In the more insecure conflict affected areas, the cluster will use
a combination of strategies to reach people including: increased
used of rapid and emergency response and mobile teams that
are focused on preventive nutrition interventions, increased use
of helicopters in delivery of supplies and the multi-sector survival
kits, scaling up nutrition outreach services, strengthen existing
capacities and community mobilization in sub urban areas across
the country.
31
Protection
Changes in needs
4.6 million
people in need
2.2 million
people to be assisted
988,500
people reached
$31 million
funds secured
$60 million
revised requirements
$27
30
projects
Government partners
Ministry of Gender, Child, Social Welfare,
Humanitarian Affairs and Disaster Management
Key achievements
yy1,757 children released from armed groups
(59 per cent of target)
yySex
yyUnaccompanied
and adolescents.
yyVulnerable
yyScale
up the GBV lifesaving minimum services package health-clinical management of rape, psychosocial support,
case management and safety/security services per population
of 10,000.
yyDevelop the safety guideline for the safety options for the SGBV
yyLivelihood
yyScaling
yyActively
yy
yyTwo
However, the ability of cluster partners to carry out those activities will largely be influenced by the evolution of the conflict,
which restricts access to affected populations in Greater Upper
Nile. Lack of access is a major concern for the protection partners in Unity and Upper Nile, as the continuing conflict poses
new protection challenges and makes the old ones more acute.
Target and beneficiary status by State (000)
650
496
yyStrengthening
and
providing timely integrated care and support, based on a
421
404
330
276
61%
240
64%
187
26%
16%
CES
41%
78%
13%
Source:
Protection
cluster,
May
2015
Source:
Protection
cluster,
May
2015
12%
65
66
106%
NA
33
Refugee response
Changes in needs
293,600
293,600
people in need
people to be assisted
264,800
people reached
$54.2 million
funds secured
$241 million
revised requirements
$821
10
projects
Government partners
Key achievements
yy40 per cent of
SUDAN
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!!
! !
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
Northern Aweil
Bahr el
Ghazal
Unity
!!
Abyei
region
!!
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
Bentiu
Malakal
Upper
Nile
134,085
96,487
Kuajok
Warrap
Western Bahr
el Ghazal
ETHIOPIA
Jonglei
Wau
2,339
Rumbek
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
261,925
Lakes
Western Equatoria
10,238
Central
Equatoria
JUBA
Eastern Equatoria
!
^
Yambio
Torit
Number of refugees
Female
Male
Bor
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
18,776
KENYA
UGANDA
Source: UNHCR, 30 April 2015
35
Water, Sanitation
and hygiene (WASH)
Changes in needs
6.4 million
people in need
3.5 million
people to be assisted
1 million
people reached
male: 516, 884 / female: 529,646
$57.3 million
funds secured
$129.5 million
revised requirements
$37
34
projects
Government partners
Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation
Key achievements
yy1,004,285 people reached with access to
Coordination and
common services (CCS)
Needs Analysis
261
organizations
261
organizations participating
$3.7 million
funds secured
$32.3 million
revised requirements
projects
Government partners
Ministry of Gender, Child, Social Welfare,
Humanitarian Affairs and Disaster Management,
and the Relief and Rehabilitation Commission
(RRC)
Response strategy
The humanitarian community is led by the Humanitarian
Coordinator (HC) and the Deputy Humanitarian Coordinator
(DHC) who focus on strategic direction, advocacy, and resource
mobilization.
OCHA works in support of the HC and DHC to ensure a coherent
and principled response to emergencies, whereby lives are saved
and the needs of some 4.6 million people are met, on time.
The NGO Forum is an independent coordinating body of approximately 160 national and 142 international NGOs that serves and
facilitates the work of its members to address the humanitarian
and development needs in South Sudan.
Key achievements
Secretariat support
37
Humanitarian hubs
In order to manage escalating operational costs and greater insecurity as a result of the economic downturn, IOM on behalf of the
humanitarian community is proposing to establish humanitarian
hubs where basic office services would be provided to aid organizations. Five hubs are being considered, in Wau, Rumbek, Torit,
Aweil and Juba that can house 50 to 250 people. Resources are
required to upgrade current hubs, and to cover running costs for
six months for new hubs and subsidies for the existing hubs.
Emergency
Telecommunications (ETC)
Changes in needs
150
organizations in need
150
organizations targeted
154
organizations reached
$1 million
funds secured
$1.6 million
revised requirements
projects
1. C
ompleting the implementation of data services to the two
ICWG prioritized sites.
2. Provision of internet connectivity in all sites.
3. Training of staff and technicians.
services
!
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
Abyei
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Key achievements
Aweil
Yida
Malakal Kaya
Maban
Bentiu
Ministry of Telecommunication
and Postal Services
Government partners
Wunrok
Kuajok
Wau
Rumbek
Mingkaman
Service type
Internet connectivity
Sources: ETC cluster, June 2015
ETHIOPIA
Ganyiel
CAR
Koch
Nyal
Yambio
DRC
Bor
JUBA
Torit
Nimule
UGANDA
Kapoeta
KENYA
39
Logistics
Changes in needs
80
organizations in need
80
organizations targeted
79
organizations reached
$48.9 million
funds secured
$114.2 million
revised requirements
projects
Government partners
n/a
Key achievements
3. P
rovision of infrastructure works to ensure the humanitarian
community is able to access affected people.
yy9,020 cm3 of
Operational modalities
yyThe cluster intends to push to maintain as much services as
possible at no cost to user in the prioritized locations.
yyAt current funding levels, from June, the air fleet is reduced with
Melut
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
Tonga
Unity
Abyei
region
Upper Nile
Malakal
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Northern
Bahr el
Ghazal
Rier
Bentiu
Aweil
Kilo 29
Kuajok
Adok
Wau
Nyal
Shambe
Rumbek
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
ETHIOPIA
Warrap
Lakes
Gutthom
Bor
Mingkaman
Mangalla
Western Equatoria
!
^
Yambio
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF
THE CONGO
Jonglei
Eastern Equatoria
JUBA
Central
Equatoria
Torit
UGANDA
KENYA
yyDispatch
yyThe
yyThere
yyCommon
Air Assets
Current scenario
1 Mi8 for humanitarian delivery (approx. tonnage: 70 mt/
month)
1 Mi8 for EMF drugs
(approx. tonnage: 70 mt/but not available to aid agencies)
0 Mi26
1 fixed wing plane
Planned
5 Mi8 - US$15,000,000 (app. tonnage: 350 mt/month)
1 Mi26 - US$7,200,000 (app. tonnage: 200 mt/month)
41
Annex
ccc_cockcroft
Annex
Number
$ Funds
Revised requirements
Secured funding
of Projects
per person
$ millions
$ millions
77
67.8
22.1
33%
n/a
32.3
3.7
11%
32
91
41
21.7
53%
n/a
1.6
66%
71
178
623.2
176.7
28%
Health
31
53
93.3
57.3
61%
Logistics
n/a
114.2
48.9
43%
Mine Action
n/a
14.5
7.3
50%
15
85
65.5
22.1
34%
Nutrition
37
72
149
45.8
31%
Protection
30
27
60
31
52%
Refugee Response
10
821
241
54.2
22%
34
37
129.5
57.3
44%
Education
Emergency Telecommunications
(4.6)
Unspecified
93.2
Total
282
1,633
637.9
Percentage
43
44 Annex
links
OCHA South Sudan: http://www.unocha.org/south-sudan
South Sudan Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) 2015:
http://j.mp/SouthSudanHRP
http://bit.ly/1G3D5sm
http://bit.ly/1FY4Say
http://bit.ly/1AW7idI
http://bit.ly/1JA7aSI
For the most up-to-date information on the appeal, use the Financial Tracking Service ( http://bit.ly/SouthSudanfts )
to navigate to the below tables:
Table C: Requirements and Funding per organization
Table D: Requirements and Funding per cluster
Table E: Requirements and funding per project
Table G: Donor contributions to projects in the HRP 2015
Table H: Donor contributions to projects in the HRP and Non HRP 2015
Annex
Acronyms
A
AAR Japan
ACF-USA
ACTED
ADRA
AET
AHA
AMREF
ARC
ARD
ASMP
AVSI
AWODA
E
Association for Aid and Relief Japan
Action against Hunger
Agency for Technical Corporation and
Development
Adventist Development and Relief Agency
Africa Educational Trust
Africa Humanitarian Action (NGO)
African Medical and Research Foundation
American Refugee Council
Action for Rural Development (NGO
Alaska Sudan Medical Project
Association of Volunteers in International Service
Aweil Window of Opportunities Development
Association
EiE
EMF
ERW
ETC
B
BSFP
C
C&D
CADA
CARE Int
CASS
CBOs
CCCM
CCM
CCOC
CERF
CESVI
CHF
CINA
CMA
CMD
CMR
COSV
CRP
CRS
CUAMM
CW
D
DCA
DDG
DRC
DRR
DSRSG
DWHH
Education in Emergency
Essential Medicines Fund
explosive remnants of war
Emergency Telecommunications (Cluster)
F
FAO
FCA
FEWS NET
FLDA
FSL
G
GAM
GBV
GUN
HC
HCO
HCT
HeRY
HI
HLSS
HRP
Humanitarian Coordinator
Hold the Child Organisation
Humanitarian Country Team
Help Restore Youth (National NGO)
Handicap International
Health Link South Sudan
Humanitarian Response Plan
I
IAS
IBIS
ICG
ICRC
ICT
ICWG
IDP
IGAD
IMA
IMC UK
INGO
INTER SOS
IOM
IPC
IRC
IRW
IYCF-E
J
JDF
JEN
K
KHI
L
LCED
LDA
LWF
45
46 Annex
M
MAG
MAGNA
MAM
MT
T
Mine Advisory Group
Magna Children at Risk
moderate acute malnutrition
Metric Ton
N
NBS
NGO
NMAA
NNGO
NPA
NRC
NRDC
O
OCHA
OSIL
OVCI
OXFAM GB
P
PAH
PCO
PIN
PLW
PoC
R
RI
RRC
RRM
RUWASSA
Relief International
Relief and Rehabilitation Commission
rapid response mechanism
Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency
S
SAM
SC
SCA
SGBV
SMART
SMC
SPEDP
SRP
SSS
SSUDA
SUFEM
TdH
THESO
TSFP
U
UN
UNAIDS
UNDP
UNDSS
UNESCO
UNFPA
UNHAS
UNHCR
UNICEF
UNIDO
UNKEA
UNMAS
UNMISS
UNOPS
UXO
United Nations
United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS
United Nations Development Porgramme
United Nations Department for Safety and
Security
United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization
United Nations Population Fund
United Nations Humanitarian Air Service
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
United Nations Childrens Fund
Upper Nile Initiative and Development
Organization
Upper Nile Kalaazar Eradication Association
UN Mine action Services
United Nations Mission in South Sudan
United Nations Office for Project Services
unexploded ordnances
V
VSF
W
WASH
WCDP
WFP
WHO
WVI
Guide to giving
CRP
CHF
CERF
fTS
United Nations
www.unocha.org/south-sudan/
http://southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info/
Twitter: @OCHASouthSudan
Facebook: UNOCHA South Sudan