Technolo,?.
Measurements
33 (1982)
219
249 - 256
of Granular
Materials
and Cohesive
Powders
H_ TSUNAKAWA
Department
240 {Japan)
of
Chemical
Engineering.
Yokohama
National
University.
156
Tokiwadai.
Hodogaya-ku,
Yokohama
and R. AOKI
Department
(Received
of Chemical
December
Engineenng,
4.1979;
University
of
Tokyo
(Japan)
1NTRODUCT:ON
APPARATUS
SUMMARY
@ Ekevier Sequoia/Printed
in The Netherlands
FmmR
RING
ISIAL mul
BASE tXJ_G
GUIGE RISG
SmfT
_ *
Fig. 1_ Direct shear tester
loading system_
Fig_ 3. Schematic
H
I
J
K
L
n
PEssRasE
LOXJtNG PIN
LOAD TRANSDUCER
scB3!3%Fr
EDKTI~
@Xl
sY!iLR@Nus mire7
LO8J T!WSWCER
L..
equippedwith a press
EXPERZMENTAL,
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSION
The granular material for *&sting was introduced into the shear cell, the movabIe part of
the cell being concentric with the fixed part.
Care was taken to ensure uniform height of
the sample throughout the cell_ The lid was
then lowered on to the top of the sample and
a chosen consolidation stress was applied in
the normal direction in order to obtain a
desired state of compaction_ This stress \V~S
then removed by liiting the lid and a small
normal stress was again applied by lowering
thelid to the sample, at which time the height
of the sample was measured by the dial-gauge.
The lid was left as it was_
The synchronous motor was then switched
on to fail the sample in shear_ As the shear
strain increased, the volume of the sample
tended to expand and the shear stress increased.
Accordingly, the resuIting normal stress
eserted against the lid increased also_ These
stresses were continuously measured simultaneously from the outputs of the two load
transducers and displayed on the X-Y recorder
chart having the normal stress as the X toordinate and the shear stress as the Y coordinate.
251
0
0.2
20
norcl~l
stress
40
exerted
60
against
the
80
lid
TOO
(o/cnl
cm
0.1
0.2
C-1
20
SO
xon-a,
I
I
ill0
10.0
60
5:r*s5.
80
c(qicm!
10
Fig. 5. Yield Ioci for four granular materials. [Material: (a) crushed coal (b) granular sugar (c) wheat (d)
polyethylene pellets] _
253
Consolidation
time
72 III-.
24 hr.
8 hr.
b::
k
r
40
I
so
Nom1
5 loo-
0
N0nral
100
stress.
200
o(g/cm)
Fig_ 7. Typical
for a cohesive
O.SS22
g/cm31
120
Strf5.S.
$4,
160
0 (g/cm~)
,
200
,
240
S-Y recorder
chart of shearing tests
powder.
[Bulk density:
(a) 0.9076,
(b)
_
a preconsolidation
of the sample, in which the
applied shear displacement was about 3 mm
and the bulk density of the sample increased
by about 3% as compared with its initial value.
At the point D the sample was failing in shear
without change in either the stresses or the
volume_ The curve DE was then measured in
the same way as the curve BC. It is therefore
taken as the yield locus of the powder with
the point D as its end-point_
Williams and Birks [ 51 have reported that
when their experimental
data for a family of
yield loci were replotted in the plane of the
reduced shear stress versus the reduced normal
stress, they fell on a single curve. Such a curve
has been called a reduced locus. In this work
the original loci have been easily converted
into their corresponding
reduced loci by
changing only the scale of the co-ordinate
system employed_ The present shear tester is
convenient for measurements
of a family of
reduced yield loci for a cohesive powder
subjected to various consolidation
stresses_
The five cohesive powders used are magnesium oxide, calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, crushed fish and polyethylene
powders.
Their average particle sizes and densities are
given in Table 2. Figure 8 shows shear test
results of families of reduced yield loci for
the five powders.
Earlier studies [5 - S] show that the yield
locus obeys satisfactorily the so-called Warren
Spring equation that has been proposed by
Ashton et al_ [ 91 as follows:
r
0+-T
c =-
(1)
TABLE
sizes
of cohesive powders
Calcium
carbonate
Particle
size*
Particle
density
(glcm3j
Magnesium oxide
Calcium carbonate
Calcium phosphate
Fish powder
Polyethylene
(b)
used
Wm)
3.65
a-70
2.34
l-10
0.960
0.30
3.45
4.67
36-4
5S-i
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
O-8
1.0
Reduced normal stre*s.
(J I s+
(b)
-0.2
:
0
cl.2
O-4
0.6
0-a
ReGuced noral
stress.
=I
1.0
o,
(a)
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Reduced norx.51 stre55.
f-r
(d)
Fish
1.0
D I ae
pmder
(cl
111
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Reduced nomal
stress.
1.0
T f c,
Cd)
1.0
0
.
-0.2
-0.2
(el
Polyetbytene
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Reduced norm.31 stres..
a,
1.0
C+
(e)
255
D
a
0
o
.
+
r
Uzgnesium mono-oxide
Calcium carbonate
C4lcitnII phosphate
Polyethylene
Fish pc*deer
Titenilmn di-oxide(Ref.(S))
Alkrd @S 0472(Ref.(a))
D Nagnesium mono-oxide
* CalcisCarbonate
0 Cal&u-.
phosphate
A Polyethylene
. Fish powder
+Titanium
di-oxide(Fzef.fS))
* Alkad W 0472(Ref.(.V))
I
100
Non&t1 stress
200
at end point.
300
ue[g/cn)
Normal
100
stress
at
200
end point.
300
oe(g/cn?)
P Polyethrienh
-Fish
powder
i-Titanium
di-oxide(fIef.(5))
x Alkad IB 0472(Ref.(a))
I
0
normal
100
stress
200
at end Point.
300
oetg/cm)
P Polyethyiene
l
Fish pouder
0
100
Noms1
stre%
at
200
end point.
300
oe(gfon)
256
L1k-T OF SYMBOLS
C
D
h
Fig. 13. Wall yield loci of Soma silica sand against two
different wall mn:eri&:
(it) rough surface wali. (b)
smooth surface wall.
K
n
T
6
P,
(T
(J,
7
cohesion, g/cm
diameter of the shear cell, cm
height of the powder bed in the fixed
part of the cell, cm
ratio defined as C/T
shear index
tensile stress, g/cm2
slope of the line joining the end-point of
the yield locus to the origin, degree
slope of lines as shown in Fig_ 3
normal stress, g/cm
normal stress at the end-point of the
yield locus, g/cm
shear stress, g/cm
REFERENCES
SZ?_
P_ T_ Stainforth,
Powder
Technol.,