Review
Abstract
The development of tissue engineering in the "eld of orthopaedic surgery is now booming. Two "elds of research in particular are
emerging: the association of osteo-inductive factors with implantable materials; and the association of osteogenic stem cells with these
materials (hybrid materials). In both cases, an understanding of the phenomena of cell adhesion and, in particular, understanding of
the proteins involved in osteoblast adhesion on contact with the materials is of crucial importance. The proteins involved in osteoblast
adhesion are described in this review (extracellular matrix proteins, cytoskeletal proteins, integrins, cadherins, etc.). During
osteoblast/material interactions, their expression is modi"ed according to the surface characteristics of materials. Their involvement
in osteoblastic response to mechanical stimulation highlights the signi"cance of taking them into consideration during development
of future biomaterials. Finally, an understanding of the proteins involved in osteoblast adhesion opens up new possibilities for the
grafting of these proteins (or synthesized peptide) onto vector materials, to increase their in vivo bioactivity or to promote cell
integration within the vector material during the development of hybrid materials. ( 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Osteoblast; Adhesion; Biomaterial; Tissue engineering
1. Introduction
Cell adhesion is involved in various natural phenomena such as embryogenesis, maintenance of tissue
structure, wound healing, immune response, metastasis
as well as tissue integration of biomaterial. The biocompatibility of biomaterials is very closely related to cell
behaviour on contact with them and particularly to cell
adhesion to their surface. Surface characteristics of materials, whether their topography, chemistry or surface
energy, play an essential part in osteoblast adhesion on
biomaterials. Thus attachment, adhesion and spreading
belong to the "rst phase of cell/material interactions and
the quality of this "rst phase will in#uence the cell's
capacity to proliferate and to di!erentiate itself on contact with the implant.
It is essential for the e$cacy of orthopaedic or dental
implants to establish a mechanically solid interface with
complete fusion between the material's surface and the
bone tissue with no "brous tissue interface. Moreover,
the recent development of tissue engineering in the "eld
0142-9612/00/$ - see front matter ( 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 4 2 - 9 6 1 2 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 2 4 2 - 2
668
the attachment to "bronectin, type I collagen and thrombospondin [2]. The addition of the peptide GRGDSP
(Gly}Arg}Gly}Asp}Ser}Pro) to human osteoblast-like
osteosarcoma cells SaOs-2 cells in a serum free medium,
inhibited cell adhesion by 28% on titanium-based alloys
(Ti6Al4V) and by 40% on CoCrMo alloys although
adhesion on glass and plastic was not a!ected. The control peptide GRADSP (Gly}Arg}Ala}Asp}Ser}Pro) had
no e!ect on cell adhesion [5]. The strength of rat calvarial cell adhesion, measured with a radial #ow apparatus, was signi"cantly higher on a RGD-peptide-coated
surface compared to a RGE-peptide-coated surface [6].
The role of RGD-peptides conformation on osteoprogenitor cell adhesion has been highlighted [7]. These
experiments have demonstrated the importance of isolated RGD-sequence containing peptides in promoting
adhesion of bone cells. Biomaterials may be improved by
a preliminary adsorption of these peptides.
2.1.2. Cytoskeleton proteins
The sites of adhesion between tissue cultured cells and
substrate surfaces are called focal contacts or adhesion
plaques. Focal contacts are closed junctions where the
distance between the substrate surface and the cell membrane is between 10}15 nm. This type of junction is rare
in vivo except for endothelial cells in vessels with high
hydrodynamic stress [8]. They also appear to be analogous to sarcolemnal dense plaques of smooth muscle cells
in vivo.
The external faces of focal contacts present speci"c
receptor proteins such as integrins. On the internal face,
some proteins like talin, paxillin, vinculin, tensin are
known mediating interactions between actin "laments
and membrane receptor proteins (integrins) (Fig. 1).
Many proteins colocalize with vinculin and talin in the
adhesion plaque: integrin, cytoskeletal proteins, proteases, protein kinases and phosphatases, signalling
molecules, etc. These proteins are involved in signal
transduction.
The formation of focal contacts occurs essentially in
cells with low motility and is promoted in vitro by extracellular matrix proteins like "bronectin or vitronectin.
The architecture of the actin cytoskeleton is essential to
the maintenance of cell shape and cell adhesion. If assembled in long bundles, F-actin supports "nger-like protrusions of the plasma membrane known as "lopodia; if
assembled in the form of a mesh, it supports sheet-like
protrusions known as lamellipodia. If present in bundles
coupled with adhesion plaques, actin &stress "bers' may
transmit forces to the substrate [9].
2.1.3. Adhesion molecules
Adhesion molecules are characterized by their capacity
to interact with a speci"c ligand. These ligands may be
situated on the membrane of neighbouring cells or may
be extracellular matrix proteins. Adhesion molecules
669
Table 1
The integrin family of adhesion receptors!
Sub-units
Other names
Ligands
Cells
b
1
a
1
VLA-1
a
2
VLA-2, GPIa-IIa,
ECMRII
a
3
VLA-3, VCA-2,
ECMRI, Gapb-3
VLA-4, LPAM-2
VLA-5, FNR,
GPIc-IIa, ECMRVI
VLA-6, GPIc-IIa
Fibronectin
VLA-7
Laminin-1
a
4
a
5
a
6
a
7
b
2
a
8
a
9
Fibronectin
Tenascin-C, osteopontin
aV
aD
aL
aM
Fibronectin, vitronectin
?
ICAM-1 to -3
C3bi, coagulation factor X,
"brinogen and ICAM-1
Fibrinogen
aV
LFA-1, CD11a-CD18
Mac-1, CR-3,
CD11b-CD18
p150, CR-4,
CD11c-CD18
VNR, CD51
aIIb
GPIIb-IIIa, CD41
aX
b
3
b
4
a
6
b
5
aV
b
6
b
7
aV
a
LPAM-1
4
aIELb M290 IEL, aH
aV
b
8
aVbS, aVb b
3
Vitronectin
Fibronectin
MadCAM, "bronectin and VCAM-1
?
?
!VLA: very late activation antigen, VCA: very common antigen, ECMR: extra cellular matrix receptor, GP: glycoprotein, Gap: galactoprotein, LFA:
leukocyte function associated antigen, M290 IEL: mouse intraepithelial lymphocyte antigen recognized by monoclonal antibody M290, FNR:
"bronectin receptor, ICAM: inter cellular adhesion molecule, LPAM: lymphocyte Peyer's patch HEV adhesion molecule (mouse), VCAM: vascular
cellular adhesion molecule, CR: C3bi receptor, VNR: vitronectin receptor, MAC: macrophage receptor.
made up of a large extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain and a short cytoplasmic domain. The
integrin spanning the cell membrane acts as an interfacer
between the intra- and extra-cellular compartments and
can translate the attachment of external ligands to internal information which induces adhesion, spreading, or
cell migration and consequently regulates cell growth
and di!erentiation (Fig. 1).
Recently, the expression of integrin in bone and in
cultured bone cells has been demonstrated. On human
bone sections, all bone cell types expressed a and
1
670
a zipper homophilic model of interactions between cadherin molecules exposed on the plasma membrane of
adjacent cells [15]. Firstly, osteoblasts have been shown
to express E-cadherins [16] and cadherin-11 (or OBcadherin) [17]. More recently, human osteoblasts have
been shown to express mRNA for cadherin-11, N-cadherin and low levels of cadherin-4. The expression of
cadherin-4 is modulated by bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) contrary to cadherin-11 and N-cadherin
expression [18]. Cadherin-11 gene is expressed in the
bone marrow and bone cells obtained from rabbits of
various age groups. The relative level of cadherin-11 gene
is greater in mature rabbit marrow than in young or aged
animals [19].
Gap junctions: cell}cell communications. Cell recognition and adhesion precede and control cell}cell
communication via gap junctions [20]. Intercellular
communications occur through direct exchange of ions
via gap junctions or through signals produced by the
action of CAM.
Gap junctions are constituted by homohexamus derived from a family of proteins called connexins. When
the connexin of one cell (composed of six connexin molecules) is in register with a similar structure on a neighbouring cell, a transcellular channel is formed [20]. Tight
and adherens junctions or desmosomes provide anchorage to surrounding cells and allow direct exchange of
ions or small molecules between cells (Fig. 1).
Osteoblasts express in vitro two connexins, connexin
43 and connexin 45 [21,22]. Connexin 43 expression by
human osteoblastic cells is regulated by retinoic acid and
transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b ) [23] and by
1
1
parathyroid hormone (PTH) and prostaglandin E
2
(PGE ) [20,24].
2
671
3. Osteoblast/material interactions
Osteoblast/material interaction depends on the surface
aspects of materials which may be described according to
their topography, chemistry or surface energy. These
surface characteristics determine how biological molecules will adsorb to the surface and more particularly determine the orientation of adsorbed molecules [31]. They
also determine the cell behaviour on contact. As previously shown, cells in contact with a surface will "rstly
attach, adhere and spread. This "rst phase depends on
previously described adhesion proteins. Thereafter, the
quality of this adhesion will in#uence their morphology,
and their capacity for proliferation and di!erentiation.
Early in vitro cytocompatibility studies focused on the
morphological aspect, growth capacity and the state of
di!erentiation of cells on materials with various chemical
compositions [32}38]. The diversity of cell responses to
the di!erent materials tested highlighted the capacity of
cells to discriminate between di!erent chemistries. However, the sensitivity of in vitro biological tests was sometimes too low to distinguish the e!ects of subtle changes
in substratum surface chemistry. No di!erences were
observed in cell colonization of polystyrene dishes
treated by sulphuric acid and gamma-irradiation although X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis
demonstrated that the two treatments introduced di!erent chemical groups onto the polymer surface [39].
Surfaces are di!erent from the corresponding bulk of
the material. For thermodynamic reasons they contain
unsaturated bonds which lead to the formation of surface
reactive layers and adsorbed contamination layers. Preparation technique e!ects such as sterilization e!ects have
been studied by several authors. They have demonstrated
the crucial e!ect of the sterilization methods of commercially pure titanium (cpTi) on in vitro subsequent cell
adhesion [40,41]. These e!ects may be related to sterilization-induced surface chemical modi"cations [42]. Some
clinical surface preparation on titanium-based alloys are
known to considerably modify the surface chemical characteristics. Improper glow discharge plasma treatment (a
frequently used method for cleaning, preparation and
modi"cation of biomaterial) can produce unwanted and
irreproducible results [43]. The surface oxide on titanium implant materials is mainly TiO and is about 2 nm
2
thick. One signi"cant di!erence, as compared to the
machined unalloyed Ti, was that AlO and no V was
x
detected on the machined Ti6Al4V surfaces. The concentration of Al on the outermost surface may constitute
672
673
674
675
Table 2
Techniques for the detachment of cells and quantitative evaluation of
cell adhesion
Technique
Cells
Micropipet aspiration
Centrifugation
Paramagnetics beads
Fluid #ow
Enzymatic detachment
Spinning disk
Microplate manipulation
Microcantilever
was previously adsorbed on these materials, cell attachment strength was comprised between about 50 and
70 dyn/cm2 [109].
Optical techniques such as total internal re#ection
#uorescence microscopy (TRIFM) or internal re#ection
microscopy (IRM) permit visual examination of cell/substrate contacts in real time. Additionally, TRIFM allows
quanti"cation of the separation distance of cells from
a biomaterial surface and has been used to evaluate the
adhesion strength on a biomaterial surface of bovine
endothelial cells following exposure to #ow [127].
676
6. Conclusion
This review has highlighted the complexity of the phenomena occurring in cell/material interactions and particularly the role of cell adhesion, which conditions
subsequent cell behavior at the interface with the material. A complete understanding of cell behavior in contact
with the material is becoming more and more essential in
attaining adequate health safety conditions for clinical
use of these hybrid materials. The development of tissular
engineering techniques in the orthopaedic domain is requiring more and more the consideration of osteoblast
adhesion properties whether for the improvement of the
surfaces of materials by adsorption or grafting of speci"c
adhesion factors, or for the development of hybrid materials associating autologous bone cells and materials.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks B. NoeK l for the tables and "gures
achievement and Dr. P. Hardouin for critical reading of
the manuscript.
References
[1] Malaval L, Chenu C, Delmas PD, ProteH ines de l'os. Maladies
meH taboliques osseuses de l'adulte. Kuntz D, editors. Paris:
Flammarion MeH decine Sciences, 1996. p. 17}35.
[2] Grzesik WJ, Robey PG. Bone matrix RGD glycoproteins: immunolocalization and interaction with human primary osteoblastic bone cells in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:487}96.
[3] Gronthos S, Stewart K, Graves SE, Hay S, Simmons PJ. Integrin
expression and function on human osteoblast-like cells. J Bone
Miner Res 1997;12:1189}97.
[4] Puleo DA, Bizios R. RGDS tetrapeptide binds to osteoblasts
and inhibits "bronectin-mediated adhesion. Bone 1991;
12:271}6.
[5] Gronowicz G, McCarthy M-B. Response of human osteoblasts
to implant materials: integrin-mediated adhesion. J Orthopaed
Res 1996;14:878}87.
[6] Rezania A, Thomas CH, Branger AB, Waters CM, Healy KE.
The detachment strength and morphology of bone cells contacting materials modi"ed with a peptide sequence found within
bone sialoprotein. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:9}19.
[7] Verrier S, Jonkczyk A, Dard M, Amedee J. E!ect of linear and
cyclic RGD-containing peptides on osteoprogenitor cell adhesion onto extracellular matrix proteins. J Bone Miner Res 1998;
23:S535.
[8] Burridge K, Fath K. Focal contacts: transmembrane links between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. BioEssays
1989;10:104}8.
[9] Zigmond SH. Signal transduction and actin "lament organization. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1996;8:66}73.
[10] Hughes DE, Salter DM, Dedhar S, Simpson R. Integrin expression in human bone. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:527}33.
[11] Saito T, Albelda SM, Brighton CT. Identi"cation of integrin
receptors on cultured human bone cells. J Orthopaed Res
1994;12:384}94.
[12] Sinha RK, Tuan RS. Regulation of human osteoblast integrin
expression by orthopedic implant materials. Bone 1996;18:451}7.
[13] Pistone M, Sanguineti C, Federici A, et al. Integrin synthesis and
utilization in cultured human osteoblasts. Cell Biol Int 1996;
20:471}9.
[14] Yamada KM, Geiger B. Molecular interactions in cell adhesion
complexes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997;9:76}85.
[15] Takeichi M. Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins. Curr
Opin Cell Biol 1995;7:619}27.
[16] Babich M, Foti LRP. E-cadherins identi"ed in osteoblastic cells:
e!ects of parathyroid hormone and extracellular calcium on
localization. Life Sci 1994;54:201}8.
[17] Okasaki M, Takeshita S, Kawai S, et al. Molecular cloning and
characterization of OB-cadherin, a new member of cadherin
family expressed in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem 1994;269:12092}8.
[18] Cheng S-L, Lecanda F, Davidson MK, et al. Human osteoblasts
express a repertoire of cadherins, which are critical for BMP-2induced osteogenic di!erentiation. J Bone Miner Res 1998;
13:633}44.
[19] Goomer RS, Maris T, Amiel D. Age-related changes in the
expression of cadherin-11, the mesenchyme speci"c calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;62:532}7.
[20] Civitelli R. Cell}cell communication in bone. Calcif Tissue Int
1995;56:S29}31.
[21] Civitelli R, Beyer EC, Warlow PM, Robertson AJ, Geist ST,
Steinberg TH. Connexin 43 mediates direct intercellular communication in human osteoblastic cell networks. J Clin Invest
1993;91:1888}96.
[22] Steinberg TH, Civitelli R, Geist ST, et al. Connexin 43 and
connexin 45 form gap junctions with di!erent molecular permeabilities in osteoblastic cells. EMBO 1994;13:744}50.
677
678
[44] Ask M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B. Preparation and surface spectroscopic characterization of oxide "lms on Ti6Al4V. Appl Surf Sci
1988;35:283}301.
[45] Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Material}tissue interfaces: the role of
surface properties and processes. Environ Health Perspect
1994;102:41}5.
[46] Healy KE, Thomas CH, Rezania A, et al. Kinetics of bone cell
organization and mineralization on materials with patterned
surface chemistry. Biomaterials 1996;17:195}208.
[47] Thomas CH, McFarland CD, Jenkins ML, Rezania A, Steele JG,
Healy KE. The role of vitronectin in the attachment and spatial
distribution of bone-derived cells on materials with patterned
surface chemistry. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:81}93.
[48] Meyle J, GuK ltig K, Wolburg H, Von Recum AF. Fibroblast
anchorage to microtextured surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;
27:1553}7.
[49] Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and
cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res
1996;32:55}63.
[50] Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, et al. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with
various surface roughness. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:155}66.
[51] Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. E!ects of a grooved
titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior
in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:1067}85.
[52] Den Braber ET, De Ruijter JE, Smits HTJ, Ginsel LA, Von
Recum AF, Jansen JA. E!ect of parallel surface microgrooves
and surface energy on cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;
29:511}8.
[53] Schwartz Z, Kieswetter K, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Underlying
mechanisms at the bone}surface interface during regeneration.
J Periodontal Res 1997;32:166}71.
[54] Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of di!erent surface
roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
1997;12:486}94.
[55] Altankov G, Groth T. Reorganization of substratum-bound
"bronectin on hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials is related
to biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1994;5:732}7.
[56] Ruardy TG, Schakenraad JM, Van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ.
Adhesion and spreading of human skin "broblasts on
physicochemically characterized gradient surface. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1415}23.
[57] Shelton RM, Rasmussen AC, Davies JE. Protein adsorption at
the interface between charged polymer substrata and migrating
osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1998;9:24}9.
[58] Steele JG, McFarland C, Dalton BA, et al. Attachment of human
bone cells to tissue culture polystyrene and to unmodi"ed polystyrene: the e!ect of surface chemistry upon initial cell attachment. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1993;5:245}57.
[59] Iuliano DJ, Saavedra SS, Truskey GA. E!ect of the confrontation and orientation of adsorbed "bronectin on endothelial cell
spreading and the strength of adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res
1993;27:1103}13.
[60] Lampin M, Warocquier-CleH rout R, Legris C, Degrange M,
Sigot-Luizard MF. Correlation between substratum roughness
and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed
Mater Res 1997;36:99}108.
[61] Sinha RK, Morris F, Shah SA, Tuan RS. Surface composition of
orthopaedic implant metals regulates cells attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization of primary human osteoblasts
in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;305:258}72.
[62] KoK noK nen M, Hormia M, Kivilahti J, Hautaniemi J, Thesle! I.
E!ect of surface processing on the attachment orientation,
and proliferation of human gingival "broblasts on titanium.
J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1325}41.
[63] Hayman EG, Pierschbacher MD, Suzuki S, Ruoslahti E. Vitronectin*a major cell attachment-promoting protein in fetal bovine serum. Exp Cell Res 1985;160:245}58.
[64] Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. E!ect of titanium
surface roughness on proliferation, di!erentiation, and protein
synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed
Mater Res 1995;29:389}401.
[65] Puleo DA, Preston KE, Sha!er JB, Bizios R. Examination of
osteoblast}orthopaedic biomaterial interactions using molecular techniques. Biomaterials 1993;14:111}4.
[66] Ozawa S, Kasugai S. Evaluation of implant materials (hydroxyapatite, glass-ceramics, titanium) in rat bone marrow
stromal cell culture. Biomaterials 1996;17:23}9.
[67] Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, et al. Titanium surface
roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to
1a,25-(OH) D . J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:77}85.
2 3
[68] Zreiqat H, Howlett CR. Titanium substrata composition in#uences osteoblastic phenotype: in vitro study. J Biomed Mater
Res 1999;47:360}6.
[69] Zreiqat H, Evans P, Howlett CR. E!ect of surface chemical
modi"cation of bioceramic on phenotype of human-bone derived cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;44:389}96.
[70] Reich KM, Gay CV, Frangos JA. Fluid shear stress as a mediator of osteoblast cyclic adenosine monophosphate production.
J Cell Physiol 1990;143:100}4.
[71] Hung CT, Pollack SR, Reilly TM, Brighton CT. Real-time
calcium response of cultured bone cells to #uid #ow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;313:256}69.
[72] Williams JL, Iannotti JP, Ham A, Bleuit J, Chen JH. E!ects of
#uid shear stress on bone cells. Biorheology 1994;31:163}70.
[73] Stanford CM, Morcuende JA, Brand RA. Proliferative and
phenotypic responses of bone-like cells to mechanical deformation. J Orthopaed Res 1995;13:664}70.
[74] Buckley MJ, Banes AJ, Levin LG, et al. Osteoblasts increase
their rate of division and align in response to cyclic, mechanical
tension in vitro. Bone and Mineral 1988;4:225}36.
[75] Miyajima K. E!ects of periodic tension on osteoblast-like cells
for cell di!erentiation and alkaline phosphatase activity. Nippon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1990;49:226}36.
[76] Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wilke HJ, Claes L. Cyclic stretching of
human osteoblasts a!ects proliferation and metabolism: a new
experimental method and its application. J Orthopaed Res
1994;12:70}8.
[77] Zhuang H, Wang W, Tahernia AD, Levitz CL, Luchetti WT,
Brighton CT. Mechanical strain-induced proliferation of osteoblastic cells parallels increased TGF-beta 1 mRNA. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun 1996;229:449}53.
[78] Fermor B, Gundle R, Evans M, Emerton M, Pocock A, Murray
D. Primary human osteoblast proliferation and prostaglandin
E release in response to mechanical strain in vitro. Bone 1998;
2
22:637}43.
[79] Keila S, Pitaru S, Grosskopf A, Weinreb M. Bone marrow from
mechanically unloaded rat bone expresses reduced osteogenic
capacity in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:321}7.
[80] Davies JE, Matsuda T. Extracellular matrix production by osteoblasts on bioactive substrata in vitro. Scanning Microsc
1988;2:1445}52.
[81] Hillsley MV, Frangos JA. Alkaline phosphatase in osteoblasts is
down-regulated by pulsatile #uid #ow. Calcif Tissue Int 1997;
60:48}53.
[82] Roelofsen J, Klein-Nulend J, Burger EH. Mechanical stimulation by intermittent hydrostatic compression promotes
bone-speci"c gene expression in vitro. J Biomech 1995;28:
1493}503.
[83] Toma CD, Ashkar S, Gray ML, Scha!er JL, Gerstenfeld LC.
Signal transduction of mechanical stimuli is dependent on
micro"lament integrity: identi"cation of osteopontin as a
[84]
[85]
[86]
[87]
[88]
[89]
[90]
[91]
[92]
[93]
[94]
[95]
[96]
[97]
[98]
[99]
[100]
679
680
[121] Burmeister JS, Vrany JD, Reichert WM, Truskey GA. E!ect of
"bronectin amount and conformation on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion to HEMA/EMA copolymers. J Biomed
Mater Res 1996;30:13}22.
[122] Anselme K, Lanel B, Gentil C, Hardouin P, Marie PJ, SigotLuizard MF. Bone organotypic culture method: a model for
cytocompatibility testing of biomaterials. Cells Mater
1994;4:113}23.
[123] Horbett TA, Waldburger JJ, Ratner BD, Ho!man AS. Cell
adhesion to a series of hydrophilic}hydrophobic copolymers
studied with a spinning disc apparatus. J Biomed Mater Res
1988;22:383}404.
[124] Thoumine O, Ott A. Time scale dependent viscoelastic and
contractile regimes in "broblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J Cell Sci 1997;110:2109}16.
[125] Yamamoto A, Mishima S, Maruyama N, Sumita M. A new
technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to
detach a cell from a material. Biomaterials 1998;19:871}9.
[126] Jones DB, Nolte H, Scholubbers JG, Turner E, Veltel D. Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblastlike cells. Biomaterials 1991;12:101}10.
[127] Burmeister JS, Olivier LA, Reichert WM, Truskey GA. Application of total internal re#ection #uorescence microscopy to study
cell adhesion to biomaterials. Biomaterials 1998;19:307}25.
[128] Urist MR. Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;
150:893}9.
[129] Sakou T. Bone morphogenetic proteins: from basic studies to
clinical approaches. Bone 1998;22:591}603.
[130] Yasko AW, Lane JM, Fellinger EJ, Rosen V, Wozney JM, Wang
EA. The healing of segmental bone defects, induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Bone
Jt Surg 1992;74-A:659}70.
[131] Cook SD, Dalton JE, Tan EH, Whitecloud TS, Rueger DC. In
vivo evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein
(rhOP-1) implants as a bone grafts substitute for spinal fusions.
Spine 1994;19:1655}63.
[132] Cook SD, Ba!es GC, Wolfe MW, Sampath KT, Rueger DC,
Whitecloud TS. The e!ect of recombinant human osteogenic
protein-1 on healing of large segmental bone defects. J Bone Jt
Surg 1994;76-A:827.
[133] Gerhart TN, Kirker-Head CA, Kriz MJ, et al. Healing segmental femoral defects in sheep using recombinant human
bone morphogenetic protein. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;293:
317}26.
[134] Johnson EE, Urist MR. One-stage lengthening of femoral
nonunion augmented with human bone morphogenetic protein.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;347:105}16.
[135] Dee KC, Rueger DC, Andersen TT, Bizios R. Conditions which
promote mineralization at the bone-implant interface: a model
in vitro study. Biomaterials 1996;17:209}15.
[136] Dee KC, Bizios R. Mini-review: Proactive biomaterials and bone
tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 1996;50:438}42.
[137] Qian JJ, Bhatnagar RS. Enhanced cell attachment to anorganic
bone mineral in the presence of a synthetic peptide related to
collagen. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;31:545}54.
[138] McDavid PT, Boone ME, Kafrawy AH, Mitchell DF. E!ect of
autologous marrow and calcitonin on reactions to a ceramic.
J Dent Res 1979;58:1478}83.
[139] Nade S, Armstrong L, McCartney E, Baggaley B. Osteogenesis
after bone and bone marrow transplantation. Clin Orthop Relat
Res 1983;181:255}63.
[140] Ohgushi H, Goldberg VM, Caplan AI. Heterotopic osteogenesis
in porous ceramics induced by marrow cells. J Orthopaed Res
1989;7:568}78.
[141] Wittbjer J, Palmer B, Rohlin M, Thorngren K-G. Osteogenic
activity in composite grafts of demineralized compact bone and
marrow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;173:229}38.
681