I. I NTRODUCTION
Water is one of the most important natural resources on the
earth to life, prosperity and wealth. As Marshall [1] remarked,
water has played a crucial role in the location, function and
growth of communities. However, the water crisis has been
announced by the World Economic Forum as the No. 1
global risk based on the impact to society (as a measure of
devastation) and the 8th based on the likelihood of occurring
within 10 years [2]. The World Health Organization has
reported that 750 million people around the world lack access
to safe water, which is approximately one-ninth of the worlds
population [5]. More disturbingly, these numbers will continue
to grow. Some part of western, modern world becomes not
much different from areas of third world affected by water
scarcity. The extreme weather and the global warming will
cause drinkable water less available in more areas, even now
the water scarcity has already affected 17% of EU territory. In
the light of these disturbing facts, any cause of water wastage
should be identified and removed if possible. Water usage at
a household level can be effectively reduced by increasing
consumers awareness and changing their inappropriate water
use behaviours in the daily routine, e.g. brushing teeth with
a running tap, using toilet as a dustbin, leaving a leaky
faucet unfixed and etc.. To cut off such wastage, a real-time
household water consumption monitoring system is required,
through which the detailed information of the amount and
the way water is used in a household can be collected, and
further analysed to identify wastage and find potential saving
opportunities.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a scenario in which objects,
animals or people with communication, sensory or action
A. System architecture
The household water consumption monitoring system is
designed for collecting detailed information on the amount
and the way water is used in a household. The system, as
shown in Fig. 1, consists of a local wireless monitoring unit in
each household and a remote central server. The local wireless
monitoring unit includes a few wireless data collectors, a
WiFi router and a WiFi gateway. The wireless monitoring
unit is responsible for collecting local water consumption data
in each household. The collected data is transmitted to the
remote central server through the home WiFi network and the
Internet. The remote central server receives data from multiple
household monitoring units.
B. Wireless data collector
A tailed wireless data collector was designed to collect
water flow rate and water temperature and then send to the
WiFi gateway wirelessly. No configuration is required as the
data collector can automatically connect with the nearest WiFi
gateway.
The indicators of the wireless data collector is shown in
Table I. The wireless data collector has the following features:
TABLE I
I NDICATOR OF WIRELESS DATA COLLECTOR
Wireless Data Collector
Front Panel
Identifiers
Description
DC IN
Sensor 1
Sensor 2
Water flow ratetemperature sensor (only for dual sensor wireless data collector)
Power (PWR)
Wireless communication
Indicator Light
TABLE II
G ATEWAY I NDICATORS
WiFi gateway
Front Panel
Identifiers
Description
LAN
DC IN
RESET
Long press for 5s to wipe user data and restore factory defaults
433M
WIFI
Power
433M
Always in off state and one flash when receiving data from wireless data collectors
WIFI
Indicator lights up when module connects with router and sending data out
Back Panel
Indicator Light
Fig. 3. Flow rate/temperature sensor connected with the wireless data collector
Fig. 5. Remote server application model
C. Wireless gateway
A tailed wireless gateway was designed as shown in Fig. 4
with the indicators shown in Table II.
The WiFi gateway has two functions:
receiving data from one or more wireless data collectors
through a 433MHz communication channel;
converting the signal into a WiFi signal and passing it to
the WiFi router.
It works regularly in a predefined interval although data
received from wireless data collectors may arrive at the gateway at any moment. There is no synchronization mechanism
between the wireless data collectors and the gateway.
The WiFi gateway can be configured wirelessly through
smart phone, PAD, PC and other mobile devices at the
household where the monitoring unit is located. Alternatively a
local PC can be also used for configuration through a standard
Ethernet.
D. Remote server software
A remote server software was also developed as a part
of the system to receive the sensed data from households in
different locations The server software is developed based on
Visual Studio 2012 and Microsoft SQL server 2014. The server
requires .NET framework 4.5 or above.
no transparent to trial households and any further extending the data usage scope will need to discuss with
households repeatedly. The current practice needs faceto-face explanation and discussion. Thus, such process
could take a long time to settle the alteration. Potentially,
the concept of IoT cannot be realised and IoT system
becomes telematics system which can only serve designated applications. One feasible solution is to enable the
data owner (e.g. household) to timely authorise the data
access with concise information via on-line management
system.
2) End-to-end self-healing mechanism. Although the IoT
water monitoring system has built-in self-healing mechanism to overcome the instability of public Internet
network, it still cannot maintain the system without
human intervention. The system uses the households
broadband Internet access to realise the wider data
access (e.g. global access). However, the system is not
integrated with the broadband router and cannot control
the broadband router. Once, the broadband router fails
to regain the Internet access. It is required households
recycle the power of router in order to regain the Internet
access. It is highly desirable that an integrated system
to ensure the end-to-end data delivery.
3) Single data access interface. The current implementation
separates the real-time data access interface and the
historical data access interface. It poses the difficulty
to IoT application development to use the IoT data. In
order to speed up the IoT application development, it is
desirable to have a single data access interface.
4) A single failure point. The current system has a single
failure point at the central database. No applications
could be available if this central database was blocked
for some reasons. Therefore a distributed database or
an in-network database might be a solution which could
remove this single failure point in the IoT system.
VI. C ONCLUSIONS
This paper reports a case study of IoT for water usage management. The IoT based water consumption system
was developed in Loughborough University in the UK and
deployed in Sosnowiec in Poland and Skiathos in Greece.
Two parts are sharing a same central database system. The
system has been in use since March 2015 and receiving the
water consumption and water temperature in real time for 30
households where 10 in Sosnowiec and 20 in Skiathos. Though
the devices and the associated software were tailored for a
European Commission FP7 programme funded project ISSEWATUS they are applicable for general use as the associated
industrial standards have been satisfied in the process of design
and manufacturing. In terms of authors knowledge these global
water monitoring devices and system cannot be found from
off-the-shelf. In terms of the research contribution a number
of lessons learned have been summarized which may highlight
the future direction of IoT research from practical aspects.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work is part of the ISS-EWATUS project (issewatus.eu)
and has been funded by the European Unions Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and
demonstration under grant agreement no (619228).
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Marshall, Water as an element of national wealth, in Pigou, A. (Ed.),
Memorials of Alfred Marshall, Kelley and Millman, New York, reprinted
in 1956, pp. 134-141.
[2] World Economic Forum (2015).Global Risks 2015 Report. Jan, 2015.
[3] O. Vermesan and P. Friess, Internet of things - from research and
innovation to market deployment, River publishers,
[4] http://ag.arizona.edu/AZWATER/awr/dec99/Feature2.htm
[5] World Health Organization and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme
(JMP). (2014). Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation, 2014 Update.
[6] Advantech, The Internet of Things, The Future is Connected Riding
the Wave of IoT Growth, Technical White Paper, 2011. Available at:
www.advantecheautomation.com. Accessed 2012 Apr 28.
[7] C. TURCU, C. TURCU, V. GAITAN, An Internet of Things oriented
approach for water utility monitoring and control, in Proc. Ecc12, pp.
175-180.
[8] S.H. Yang, Wireless Sensor Networks: Principles, Design and Applications, Springer, 2014, pp.247-261.
[9] A. Zanella, N. Bui, A. Castellani, L. Vangelista and M. Zorzi, Internet
of Things for Smart Cities, IEEE Internet of things journal, 1(1), 2014,
pp. 22-32.
[10] Juniper Research, Smart homes its an Internet of Things thing, white
paper. Available at http://connectedplusshow.com/assets/she14 wp.pdf.
[11] Olivier Monnier, A smarter grid with the Internet of
Things,
white
paper,
Texas
Instruments.
Available
at
http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slyb214/slyb214.pdf.
[12] D. Niyato, E. Hossain and S. Camorlinga, Remote patient monitoring
service using heterogeneous wireless access networks: architecture and
optimization, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 27(4), 2009, pp. 412423.
[13] L. Yang, S. H. Yang and L. Plotnick, How the internet of things technology enhances emergency response operations, Technological Forecasting
and Social Change, 80(9), Nov 2013, pp. 18541867.
[14] A. Llic, T. Staake and E. Fleisch, Using sensor information to reduce
the carbon footprint of perishable goods, IEEE Pervasive Comput., 8(1),
2009, pp. 2229.
[15] G. Broll, E. Rukzio, M. Paolucci, M. Wagner, A. Schmidt and H. Hussmann,PERCI: pervasive service interaction with the internet of things,
IEEE Internet Comput., 13(6), 2009, pp. 7481.
[16] R. Dolin and Echelon, Building an IoT for industrial control: Part 1 What is Industrial IoT?.
[17] R. Dolin and Echelon, Building an IoT framework for industrial control:
Part 2 - The IoT framework.