com
To oat or
not to oat?
Sue Staunton from James Cowper
Kreston weighs up the global IPO
opportunities for life science rms
Issue 6 2015
Screening
focus
With contributions from Angela Panarella
and Jeremy C. Simpson, UCD Cell
Screening Laboratory, University College
Dublin, and Horst Flotow from Hit
Discovery Constance
Monitoring, understanding
and assessing quality
Experts from the United States Food and Drug Administration review the major
achievements of the PAT movement in our In-Depth Focus
metrohmMHQR.com
INTRODUCTION
EDITORIAL BOARD
Sheraz Gul
Vice President and Head of Biology,
FraunhoferIME SP
Matthew Moran
Director, PharmaChemical Ireland
Don Clark
Pfizer Global Supply
Michael J. Miller
President, Microbiology Consultants
Jumping on the
M&A bandwagon
Michael H. Elliott
CEO, Atrium Research & Consulting
David Elder
Director Externalisation Group, GlaxoSmithKline
Andrew Teasdale
Principal Scientist Chair of Impurities
Advisory Group, AstraZeneca
Independent audit
watchdog service for
printed publications
European Pharmaceutical Review can guarantee its circulation
is 11,999 (for the 6 issues distributed between 1 January 2014
and 31 December 2014). The publication is ABC audited.
This is an independent verification that our circulation is genuine.
The pharmaceutical industry has a knack of bouncing back in times of adversity, and as the
challenges facing them rage on: drugs pricing pressures and loss of key patent exclusivities
to name but two, the number of mergers and acquisitions that have taken place lately have
rocketed, with companies forging relationships in a frenzy of deal-making as they seek to
maintain revenue growth. The most notable purchase recently has to be that of Irish firm
Allergan by global giant Pfizer in a deal valued at a record-breaking $160 billion. Other big
names have also been at it. For example, Teva recently announced plans to acquire Allergans
generic business, Actavis Generics; Valeant Pharmaceuticals purchased Sprout in a $1 billion
cash deal, and Swiss company Cytos Biotechnology announced that it will tie the knot
(so to speak) with orthobiologic player Kuros Biosurgery.
But will the resulting firms, especially the super companies emerging from deals such
as Pfizers, succeed in delivering increased value for shareholders, as well as more efficient
drugs for patients and payers? Some would say not, with the Pfizer deal believed to have
been a cunning tax-evasion ploy (Pfizer will move its headquarters to Ireland which has
a lower tax jurisdiction) shedding a reasonable amount of concern. Investors say that
mega-mergers can actually dampen value, the challenge of large-scale integration disrupting
the company and its R&D productivity.
On the other hand, whereas M&D activity used to be focused more on late-stage
pipelines, deals now take place earlier in the process at Phase 2 trials and sooner. It is
certainly a riskier strategy, financially, but arguably better for patients: it is logical to assume
that the effort of two companies, sharing their differing expertise to progress a less mature
candidate, is going to lead to a better outcome for that drug product, increasing its chances
of success.
Whatever your views on the latest headline-grabbing pharma news, I hope you
enjoy this issue of European Pharmaceutical Review our final edition of the year. If you
would like to get in touch, you can contact me by email on crichards@russellpublishing.com,
and to ensure you receive every issue of the magazine, please subscribe at
(www.europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com/subscribe); its free to do so. On our website, you
can also find details of current and future issues, sector news and event details.
Caroline Richards
Editor, European Pharmaceutical Review
Follow us on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/PharmaReview
Free print and digital subscriptions are available for
members of JPAG subscribe now by visiting
Join us on LinkedIn:
www.europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com
http://linkd.in/PharmaReview
No responsibility can be accepted by Russell Publishing Limited, the editor, staff or any contributors for action taken as a result of the information and other materials contained in our publications. Readers should take specific advice when
dealing with specific situations. In addition, the views expressed in our publications by any contributor are not necessarily those of the editor, staff or Russell Publishing Ltd. As such, our publications are not intended to amount to advice on
which reliance should be placed. We therefore disclaim all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on such materials by any reader, or by anyone who may be informed of any of its contents.
Published December 2015
Pharma&Biotech
Endotoxin Expertise
At Your Fingertips
QC INSIDER TOOLBOX
QC Insider Toolbox
SUPPORT
TRAINING
LIBRARY
The new QC Insider Toolbox puts support right at your fingertips support you and your team
can access any time and from anywhere in the world.
QC Insider Support One-on-one guidance, software support, and more from our QC experts
QC Insider Training Self-directed training resources that will help you build on your QC expertise
QC Insider Library Product instructions and technical guides your team needs to succeed
Turn your endotoxin testing team into QC Insider experts
today by visiting www.lonza.com/qcinsider
www.lonza.com
Contents
1
INTRODUCTION
37 CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURING
FOREWORD
NEWS
EVENTS
11 MICROBIOLOGY SERIES
60 SHOW PREVIEW
SLAS 2016
61 REGULATORY INSIGHT
29 WEBINAR REVIEW
31 PRODUCT HUB
Chemspeed
32 PCR
Nanotechnology
Formulation
Bringing EPR
to a Wider World
The EMXnano from Bruker is a compact, state-of-the-art benchtop instrument designed to give you the
power and exibility you need for a range of analysis and teaching applications. With the latest digital
and microwave technologies, the EMXnano provides superior sensitivity and stability with minimal infrastructure and a low cost of ownership.
To learn how you can add EPR to your lab, please visit: www.bruker.com/emxnano
EPR
FOREWORD
The International Conference on Harmonization M7 text provides guidance on establishing acceptable levels of
mutagenic impurities (MIs)1. It also outlines the safety and quality risk management processes that manufacturers
need to undertake to control MIs that may potentially affect the drug substance or drug product. Over the past
decade, some of the most significant challenges facing the pharmaceutical industry have been linked to performing
genotoxic risk assessments (GRAs) and implementing a control strategy, including the analysis of these MIs and
potentially mutagenic impurities (PMIs) at very low levels (ppm) in drug substances and products.
Historically, industry has responded to regulatory concerns by
tion. For each stage, the individual purge factors are multiplied to attain
burden can be achieved by analysing the purge factor , i.e., the ability of
3
Conclusion
ICH M7, i.e., as part of the control section (option 4). Additionally, there
is an emerging view that the purge tool may also be applicable to non-
2,3
References
1.
ICH M7. 2014. Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in
pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. Step 4. June 2014
2.
Teasdale A, Elder DP, Chang S-J, Wang S, Thompson R, Benz N, Sanchez Flores, IH.
2013. Risk assessment of genotoxic impurities in new chemical entities: Strategies to
demonstrate control. Org Proc. Res. Dev. 17, 221-230
3.
Teasdale A, Elder, DP, Fenner, S. 2011. Chapter 9. Strategies for the evaluation of
Genotoxic Impurity Risk. In Genotoxic Impurities: Strategies for identification and
control, Teasdale, A. Ed. Willey, New York
4.
5.
ICH Q3A(R2). 2006. Impurities in new drug substances. Step 4, October 2006
NEWS
EMERGENT BIOSOLUTIONS
CHEMSPEED TECHNOLOGIES
NICE
MERCK KGaA
Merck receives
disappointment
with evofosfamide
failure
Merck KGaA and its partner Threshold
Pharmaceuticals have announced that they
are not planning to file for approval of
evofosfamide in advanced soft tissue
sarcoma and advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma after it failed to offer life
extensions in two Phase III studies.
The Phase 3 studies were being
conducted under Thresholds collaboration with Merck KGaA. In the Phase 3
MAESTRO study, patients with previously
untreated, locally advanced unresectable or
metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
treated with evofosfamide in combination
with gemcitabine did not demonstrate a
statistically significant improvement in
overall survival (OS) compared with
gemcitabine plus placebo.
In the Phase 3 TH-CR-406/SARC021
trial, patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
treated with evofosfamide in combination
with doxorubicin did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS
compared with doxorubicin alone.
Merck KGaA has said it will now be
redeploying its resources into high-profile
future products, such as avelumab.
NEWS
BIOETHICS INTERNATIONAL
NEWS
ROCHE
PFIZER
Mega-merger
between Pfizer and
Allergan costs $160bn
Pfizer is purchasing Allergan for a whopping $160 billion, in what is being heralded as
the most expensive pharmaceutical deal ever
to be made.
Under the terms of the transaction, the
businesses of Pfizer and Allergan will be
combined under Allergan plc, which will
be renamed Pfizer plc. The companies
expect that shares of the combined company
will be listed on the New York Stock
Exchange and trade under the PFE ticker.
However, the move will also see Pfizer
relocating its headquarters from the US to
Ireland, and thus it will benefit from a lower
corporate tax rate such an inversion deal is
increasingly attracting criticism in the US
and could have a knock-on effect on tax
inversion rules, leading to them being
tightened even further, with new legislation
brought in to prevent this practice.
Pfizer says the combined company will
benefit from a broader innovative portfolio of
leading medicines in key categories and a
platform for sustainable growth with
diversified payer groups. The combined
pipeline will contain over 100 mid-to-late
stage pipeline programmes.
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS
Orkambi approved
as first drug to treat
underlying cause
of cystic fibrosis
Vertex Pharmaceuticals cystic fibrosis treatment
Orkambi (lumacaftor/ivacaftor) has been
granted approval by the European Commission,
making it the first medicine to treat the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis.
Orkambi is authorised for use in patients
aged 12 and older who have two copies of the
F508del mutation, for which is was approved in
the United States in July 2015, however the
company is also currently conducting Phase III
trials in children aged six to 11 years.
The EU approval is based on previously
announced data from two 24-week global Phase
3 studies, TRAFFIC and TRANSPORT, and
additional interim 24-week data from the
subsequent extension study, PROGRESS. In the
TRAFFIC and TRANSPORT studies, which
enrolled more than 1,100 patients, those treated
with the combination Orkambi experienced
significant improvements in lung function.
Patients also experienced improvements in body
mass index (BMI) and reductions in pulmonary
exacerbations (acute lung infections) including
those requiring hospitalisations and intravenous
antibiotic use. Interim data from PROGRESS
showed that these improvements were sustained
through 48 total weeks of treatment.
PHARMA EVENTS
JANUARY 2016
FEBRUARY 2016
Festival of Genomics
11th Annual
Biomarkers Congress
Date: 19 21 January
Location: London, UK
e: eleanor@frontlinegenomics.com
w: www.festivalofgenomicslondon.com
Pharmaceutical
Microbiology 2016
Date: 20 21 January
Location: London, UK
e: events@smi-online.co.uk
w: www.pharma-microbiology.com/epr
SLAS 2016
Date: 23 27 January
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
w: www.slas2016.org
IFPAC 2016:
International Forum &
Exhibition Process
Analytical Technology
Quality by Design
Date: 17 18 March
Location: London, UK
e: hplc@confereneseries.com
w: www.hplc.conferenceseries.com
Date: 25 26 February
Location: Manchester, UK
e: d.dalby@oxfordglobal.co.uk
w: www.biomarkers-congress.com
APRIL 2016
MARCH 2016
3rd Annual
Peptides Congress
Pittcon 2016:
Where Innovations
in Pharmaceutical
Science go to Play
Date: 18 19 April
Location: London, UK
e: g.alonso@oxfordglobal.co.uk
w: www.peptides-congress.com
Date: 6 10 March
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
e: info@pittcon.org
w: www.pittcon.org
POWTECH 2016
Date: 19 21 April
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
w: www.powtech.de
MAY 2016
Genetics in Forensics
Date: 10 13 May
Location: Munich, Germany
w: www.analytica.de
Analytica 2016
Date: 14 15 March
Location: London, UK
e: g.alonso@oxfordglobal.co.uk
w: www.forensicgenetics-congress.com
Sean Pavone / Shutterstock.com
Date: 24 27 January
Location: Arlington, Virginia
(Washington, DC), USA
e: info@ifpacnet.org
w: www.IFPACglobal.org
HPLC
Congress 2016
2nd Formulation
& Drug Delivery
Congress 2016
Date: 18 19 May
Location: London, UK
e: g.alonso@oxfordglobal.co.uk
w: www.formulation-congress.com
JUNE 2016
5th European
Biosimilars Congress
Date: 27 29 June
Location: Valencia, Spain
e: biosimilars@conferenceseries.net
w: www.biosimilars-biologics.pharmaceutical
conferences.com/europe
SLAS High
Content Screening
Conference
Date: 27 29 June
Location: Dresden, Germany
e: psantiago@slas.org
w: www.europe-slas.org/
high-content-screening-conference.htm
www.criver.com
MICROBIOLOGY SERIES
The European Pharmaceutical Review's Microbiology Series is
brought to you in association with Charles River Laboratories
The recent revision to USP General Informational Chapter <1223> Validation of Alternative Microbiological Methods
that became official on December 1, 2015 contained a section discussing the limitations of the colony-forming unit
(CFU) in terms of enumerating only those microorganisms that readily grow on solid microbiological media.
The section highlights its inappropriateness as a gold standard for method validation when there are many signals
available other than CFUs for the detection, enumeration and identification of microorganisms in water, air,
pharmaceutical ingredients and drug products.
The advent of ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis thirty years ago
water, air, soil and the human body and reemphasised that, overall,
Robert Koch and his co-workers. To isolate the growth to single points
around 80% for the microbiota on the human forearm. Questions that
later, but this was selective for the microorganism most suitable for
achieved in 1878 when the British surgeon Joseph Lister combined serial
humour, and fixed and stained bacteria with methyl violet on a coverslip
Abbe condenser and immersion oil, which gave better definition owing
100 parts water, 10 parts dextrose, one part ammonium tartrate and one
part the ash of yeast cells to grow bacteria. However, before isolation on
publish the findings to clearly establish the scientific basis of the germ
solid media became a standard practice, it can be said that Pasteur did
theory of disease, and helped Koch find positions suitable for a scientist
1,2,3,4,5,6
The transitional step between liquid and solid culture was the work
the German Imperial Institute for Infectious Diseases was the most
For the plate technique, Koch essentially took nutrient broth, which
suggested that different bacteria were unique species, since the colour
11
MICROBIOLOGY SERIES
and isolate pure cultures as distinctive colonies on the plate. Two
widely used, but unfortunately many bacteria do not grow on the culture
media commonly used, while those that grow often occur in large clumps
that do not break up when plated both of which in fact cause the plate
required by many pathogenic bacteria and was not inert (many bacteria
the material4. Eighty years later, in their influential review article, Staley
hydrolysed it), was replaced by the gelling agent agar, used in Asian
and Konopka11 coined the catchy term the great plate count anomaly to
cooking. Secondly, the flat, indented glass plates that supported the
that could be sterilised by dry heat, hold the molten nutrient agar
poured into it, and be inoculated and stacked during incubation .
2
The progress that Koch and his co-workers had made in the develop-
to ensure purity, and harvested by washing the colonies off the plate
with suitable diluents. Colony density affects colony size with reduced
oxygen and nutrient depletion occurs in the core of the colony so that
the growth status of individual cells will differ, with the youngest cell at
the margins and the oldest at the centre of the colonies. Using bacterial
recognised the limitations of the CFU early on, observing that the
number of cells in his samples did not match the number of colonies
growing on a solid microbiological plate. This discrepancy was
A genetic revolution
on an agar plate. Conn8 reported that the total microscopic count of soil
bacteria was at least 10 to 100 times greater than plate counts from the
same soil samples. He believed that this discrepancy was not due to
poor dispersion or the presence of dead cells in the samples but down
Plate limitations
Thirty years ago, rRNA analysis was first used to analyse environ-
More recent studies using fluorescent stains have shown that the total
mental samples from less complex ecosystems like hot springs, copper
It has been suggested that plate counts select for rapid growing
bacteria and do not favour slow growing bacteria but factors including
polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the larger 16S rRNA gene fragment
16S rRNA databases to identify bacterial species. In 1986, Pace and his co-
10
Current perspectives
separate from every other one and grows as a colony, it is obvious that
locations in the body in near pure culture and readily make the
12
MICROBIOLOGY SERIES
enter a non-cultivable state when exposed to salt water, freshwater or
17
alternative signal will reveal whether changes are occurring over time20.
and the plate count and multiple-tube fermentation methods for the
in the alternative signal that will reflect the microbial population in the
for use using CFU will retain their quality level despite the measurement
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
classical methods based on the CFU, the USP needs to respond to this
rapid microbiological method validation challenge. For example, the
current compendial sterility tests are unsuitable for the emerging short-
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Headspace analysis.
19.
These signals may be numerically higher than CFU, since they are not
limited by the ability of microorganisms to grow in microbiological
20.
13
Beauty. Brains.
And now more brawn.
Meet the more choice iQue Screener PLUS.
Just when you thought the iQue Screener had
everything for cells and beads in suspension, the
iQue Screener PLUS gives you even more insight:
Richest content delve deep into your
biology with up to 15 parameters of
information from 3 lasers.
Screening
16 High-content screening
accelerates discovery
rates in the life sciences
Angela Panarella & Jeremy C. Simpson, UCD Cell
Screening Laboratory, University College Dublin
21 Phenotypic screening
using 3D tissue culture
and whole animal assays
Horst Flotow, Hit Discovery Constance
25 Screening Roundtable
Moderated by Jeremy C. Simpson, UCD Cell
Screening Laboratory, University College Dublin
SPONSORS
15
High-content screening
accelerates discovery
rates in the life sciences
Angela Panarella and Jeremy C. Simpson
UCD Cell Screening Laboratory, University College Dublin
In the past decade, the increasing power of informatics combined with the application of automation has facilitated
big data handling and the development of large-scale approaches to address key issues in the life sciences. The
omics disciplines such as genomics, proteomics and metabolomics became established during this time, allowing
researchers to expand their level of investigation to the scale of complex multicellular organisms. In this wider
context, imaging techniques allowing qualitative spatial and temporal subcellular definition of molecules and
organelles have been combined with improved molecular and cell biology tools, automation and image analysis,
giving rise to the field of high-content screening (HCS) microscopy.
HCS represents a step forward from the low sample-throughput and
information found in cells; information that is lost when cells are lysed
16
Maeve Long, UCD Cell Screening Laboratory, analyses some cells in the HCS image analysis suite
phenotypic profiling of each individual cell, followed for more than two
Dr. George Galea, UCD Cell Screening Laboratory, uses a liquid handling robot to prepare a set of plates for
an HCS assay
17
SPEED OR
SENSITIVITY?
THE ANSWER IS YES
www.perkinelmer.com/YES
Copyright 2015 PerkinElmer, Inc. 400285_14 All rights reserved. PerkinElmer is a registered
trademark of PerkinElmer, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
screens, which are typically more focussed, at a smaller scale and use a
with two colours and 200ms acquisition time per channel (plus 1 second
the principle that the data generated must come from individual
years has been to employ 3D cell culture models, for example, cell cysts
tremendous pace.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
Brayden, DJ et al. High-content analysis for drug delivery and nanoparticle applications.
Drug Discovery Today. 2015; 20 (8), 942-57
5.
19
DO MORE
www.biotek.com
Caenorhabditis elegans
Phenotypic screening
using 3D tissue culture
and whole animal assays
Horst Flotow
Hit Discovery Constance
Phenotypic, or high content, screening (HCS) is an automated microscopy that allows very precise interrogation of
cellular and even whole animal assays. The high throughput is achieved by automating the image analysis and
quantifying the abundance and subcellular distribution of a target such as a protein or organelle using fluorescent
detection reagents including antibodies and specific stains. HCS can measure a compounds effects on a specific
cellular target within individual cells and can be used to screen biologically relevant cell- and whole animal-based
assays (designed as disease models) against large compound libraries. In addition, the technique can multitask
(multiplex) and measure several targets at once, further increasing the information content and utility of these
screens. As a result, a more informed selection of hit compounds that have improved chances of progressing
through the drug discovery pipeline can be made during primary screening.
Phenotypic screening
Phenotypic assays are actually nothing new; in fact, early drug discovery
was mostly carried out mostly using simple phenotypic assays such as
21
establish and maintain and have a low throughput, some recent efforts
model system that may find its way into HCS application. As the name
implies, organoids are mammalian 3D model
used to classify compounds and may give clues to the mode of action
or target of unknown compounds2-4.
All early stages of drug discovery can benefit enormously from the use
throughput assays even a couple of years ago can now be run as HTS
efficacy and toxicity. HCS offers the possibility to bring in animal models
interest for drug discovery using HCS three-dimensional (3D) cell and
earlier and even use them for primary screening. The technological
any standard microscopic analysis can now be carried out and analysed
Most cell-based assays, including those currently used for HCS, work
in microtitre plates. Clearly, this kind of HTS can only be carried out with
animals that are small and can be grown or kept in microtitre plates.
This contrasts with the in vivo growth of cells where there is interaction
Although adult zebrafish cannot fit into the well of a microtitre plate,
role in normal cell and tissue formation and function. Many of these
their embryos can be kept in 96 or 384 well plates and compounds may
23
(and software), thus removing this potential obstacle. Instead, the main
bottleneck for the effective adoption and use of 3D tissue culture and
whole animal assays in HTS (HCS) will most likely be the development of
7,8
References
1.
HTS approach9.
2.
Lei Z, Tan IB, Das K, Deng N, Zouridis H, Pattison S, et al. Identification of Molecular
Subtypes of Gastric Cancer With Different Responses to PI3-Kinase Inhibitors and 5Fluorouracil. YGAST. Elsevier, Inc; 2013 Sep 1;145(3):55465
3.
4.
Zhou J, Yong W-P, Yap CS, Vijayaraghavan A, Sinha RA, Singh BK, et al. An integrative
approach identified genes associated with drug response in gastric cancer.
Carcinogenesis. 2015 Apr;36(4):44151
5.
6.
7.
Giacomotto J, Sgalat L. High-throughput screening and small animal models, where are
we? British Journal of Pharmacology. 2010 Mar 4;160(2):20416
8.
Ewbank JJ, Zugasti O. C. elegans: model host and tool for antimicrobial drug discovery.
Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2011 May 9;4(3):3004
9.
24
pedrosala / Shutterstock.com
Guillaume Frugier
Jacob Tesdorpf
Joseph M. Zock
Peter Banks
Senior Director,
Product Management,
IntelliCyt Corporation
Scientific Director,
BioTek Instruments Inc
Moderator
Jeremy C. Simpson, UCD Cell Screening Laboratory, University College Dublin
driven a move to high-content assays. While assays for plate readers are
25
for immunology!
Peter Banks
in vitro methods (3D cell culture) or biopsied tissue. Cost, supply and
difficulty of use limit their potential. Stem cells have the potential to
The precision, ease of use and relative freedom of this gene editing tool
from off-target effects will ensure widespread adoption in genome
Frugier:
screening. In HTS, the use of kinetic ligand binding also deserves a nod.
1.
discovery.
2.
Tesdorpf: Coming off a record year in United States Food and Drug
Administration approvals, the challenge is to further grow productivity
at stagnant budgets. More complex cellular models often equal higher
3.
26
each screen that is why the Opera Phenix High Content Screening
System provides fast and gentle live cell imaging for maximum sensitivity
larger data volumes, especially when working with live cells or 3D models.
better data to drive drug discovery. The two major challenges I see are
Jacob Tesdorpf
Banks: The principal challenges with using more complex cell models in
screening are cost, supply, and difficulty of use. For spheroids, the two
the latter technology. Each is somewhat limited in the type of cell used
from particular research areas have paved the way for academia to step
spheroid formation.
The high sample cost mean it is important to maximise the data from
27
Alex_Traksel / Shutterstock.com
drug targets and developing complex cell models that can effectively
Steven Haney.
mimic the disease state in vitro. This type of collaboration forms the
Tesdorpf: Whole well read-outs provide fast and robust read-outs of the
minimal amounts of data. This allows for very high throughput screens
although there is a cost downside to this. Also, there are many off the
Guillaume Frugier
whole well assays limit the ability to analyse the complexity and
28
Reference
1.
Sirenko et al., Assay and Drug Development Technologies, 13: 402, 2015
Dr. Iva Navratilova works with SPR, and GPCRs are one of her
developments (for example the use of SPR assays for a large variety of
membrane proteins).
take place.
screening of wild-type GPCRs, SPR and the Biacore S200, feel free to
www.gehealthcare.com
http://www.europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com/webinar24
If you would like European Pharmaceutical Review to organise and host your webinar,
contact Andrew Johnson now on +44 (0) 1959 563 311 or email ajohnson@russellpublishing.com
Dont forget to also join our Groups on LinkedIn http://linkd.in/PharmaReview and Twitter http://twitter.com/PharmaReview
to keep up-to-date with the latest industry news and be the first to know when our next webinar will take place
29
PRODUCT HUB
plugs into the overall workflow and handles standard source vials as
compound loss, and simply doesnt meet the required accuracy. More
and more compounds are not available in the required amounts, are too
This is where the SWILE solution comes in. The SWILE Automated
management solution.
solution for solids, Dr. Schneider points out. He adds that the
Workstation gives pick and dispense capability from almost any source
www.chemspeed.com
31
PCR
MIQE compliance in
expression profiling and
clinical biomarker discovery
Irmgard Riedmaier, Melanie Spornraft, Benedikt Kirchner and Michael W. Pfaffl
Technical University of Munich
Molecular diagnostics and biomarker discovery are gaining increasing attraction in clinical research. This includes
all fields of diagnostics, such as risk assessment, disease prognosis, treatment prediction and drug application
success control1,2. The detection of molecular clinical biomarkers is very widespread and can be developed on
various molecular levels, like the genome, the epi-genome, the transcriptome, the proteome or the metabolome.
Today, numerous high-throughput laboratory methods allow rapid and holistic screening for such marker
candidates. Regardless of which molecular level is analysed, in order to detect biomarker candidates, high
sample quality and a standardised and highly reproducible quantification workflow are prerequisites. This article
describes an optimal and approved development strategy to discover and validate transcriptional biomarkers in
clinical diagnostics, which are in compliance with the recently developed MIQE guidelines3. We focus on the
importance of sample quality, RNA integrity, available screening and quantification methods, and biostatistical
tools for data interpretation.
The application of molecular biomarkers is a common research field in
products (metabolomics)2,4,5.
on the expression profile and expression rate of specific genes. This first
gene into the coding messenger RNA (mRNA). Beside mRNA, the
32
PCR
transcriptome also includes a huge variety of non-coding RNAs which
been shown multiple times that the integrity of all RNA transcripts has
quality RNA. It has been shown that the RNA integrity number, which is
correlates with the resulting Cq value and hence with the quantification
result. The better the RNA integrity and the higher the RIN value, the
There are two main strategies for biomarker detection for a specific
therefore quantified. This allows for the detection of new and unknown
analysed samples and the nucleic acids contained within. It has already
Figure 1: Correlation analysis of miR-3431 expression between results obtained from small
RNA-Seq analysis and single miRNA target RT-qPCR analysis
34
PCR
single target RT-qPCR assays showed that the
obtained read count correlated well with the Cq
values from qPCR (Figure 1; page 34).
Figure 2: HCA (A) and heatmap (B) analysis of a biomarker research trial with 21 controls and 14 treatment
samples. Herein 11 independent gene transcripts were integrated in the analysis applying Genex software15
(MultiD, Sweden)
and the best biomarker similarities are combined in one cluster. Finally,
35
PCR
reach this goal. For the detection and expression profiling of
transcriptomic biomarkers, different general quantification strategies are available. Either the expression of a set of predefined
genes is quantified using RT-qPCR or a holistic approach is taken to
monitor the whole transcriptome of a biological sample, applying
RNA-Seq10. Regardless of which of those strategies is followed, the
result is ideally a set of candidate genes, whose expression is changed.
To get the intended information out of such a biomarker set,
multivariate data analysis tools, like HCA, PCA or heatmaps are
very helpful. In the research field of establishing new sensitive detection methods for drug abuse in veterinary molecular
diagnostics, those biostatistical methods have already been
successfully employed18.
References
References
1. Hulka BS (1990) Overview of biological markers. In: Biological markers in epidemiology
(Hulka BS, Griffith JD, Wilcosky TC, eds), pp 315. New York: Oxford University Press
2. Atkinson AJ (2001) NCI-FDA Biomarkers Definitions Working Group; Biomarkers and surrogate
endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework; Clin. Pharmaco. Ther. 69: 8995
3. Bustin, SA, Benes, V, Garson, JA, Hellemans, J, Huggett, J, Kubista, M, Mueller, R, Nolan,
T, Pfaffl, MW, Shipley, GL, Vandesompele, J, Wittwer, CT. The MIQE guidelines: minimum
information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem., 2009, 55
4. Sewall CH, Bell DA, Clark GC, Tritscher AM, Tully DB, Vanden Heuvel J, Lucier GW
(1995) Induced gene transcription: implications for biomarkers. Clin Chem. 12(2):
1829-1834
5. Riedmaier, I. and Pfaffl, MW. Transcriptional biomarkers high throughput screening,
quantitative verification, and bioinformatical validation methods. Methods, 2013, 59
6. Kiss T.: Small nucleolar RNA-guided post-transcriptional modification of cellular RNAs.
EMBO J. 2001, 20(14): 3617-3622
7. Becker, C, Hammerle-Fickinger, A, Riedmaier, I, Pfaffl, MW. mRNA and microRNA quality
control for RT-qPCR analysis. Methods, 2010, 50
8. Fleige, S and Pfaffl, MW. RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR
performance. Mol. Aspects Med., 2006, 27
9. Kalmar, A, Wichmann, B, Galamb, O, Spisak, S, Toth, K, Leiszter, K, Tulassay, Z, Molnar, B.
Gene expression analysis of normal and colorectal cancer tissue samples from fresh frozen
and matched formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens after manual and
automated RNA isolation. Methods, 2013, 59
10. Wang, Z, Gerstein, M, Snyder, M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat.
Rev. Genet., 2009, 10
11. Riedmaier, I, Benes, V, Blake, J, Bretschneider, N, Zinser, C, Becker, C, Meyer, HH, Pfaffl,
MW. RNA-sequencing as useful screening tool in the combat against the misuse of anabolic
agents. Anal. Chem., 2012, 84
12. Riedmaier, I, Becker, C, Pfaffl, MW, Meyer, HH. The use of omic technologies for biomarker
development to trace functions of anabolic agents. J. Chromatogr. A, 2009, 1216
13. Bergkvist, A, Rusnakova, V, Sindelka, R, Garda, JM, Sjogreen, B, Lindh, D, Forootan, A,
Kubista, M. Gene expression profiling Clusters of possibilities. Methods, 2010, 50
14. Kubista, M, Andrade, JM, Bengtsson, M, Forootan, A, Jonak, J, Lind, K, Sindelka, R,
Sjoback, R, Sjogreen, B, Strombom, L, Stahlberg, A, Zoric, N. The real-time polymerase
chain reaction. Mol. Aspects Med., 2006, 27
15. GenEx qPCR data analysis software version 5.0 (MultiD, Gothenburg, Sweden)
16. Lee, G, Rodriguez, C, Madabhushi, A. Investigating the efficacy of nonlinear dimensionality
reduction schemes in classifying gene and protein expression studies. IEEE/ACM. Trans.
Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 2008, 5
17. Beyene, J, Tritchler, D, Bull, SB, Cartier, KC, Jonasdottir, G, Kraja, AT, Li, N, Nock, NL,
Parkhomenko, E, Rao, JS, Stein, CM, Sutradhar, R, Waaijenborg, S, Wang, KS, Wang, Y,
Wolkow, P. Multivariate analysis of complex gene expression and clinical phenotypes with
genetic marker data. Genet. Epidemiol., 2007, 31 Suppl 1
18. Riedmaier, I, Pfaffl, MW, Meyer, HH. The physiological way: monitoring RNA expression
changes as new approach to combat illegal growth promoter application. Drug Test. Anal.,
2012, 4 Suppl 1
piotr_pabijan / Shutterstock.com
CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURING
Designing a novel
continuous manufacturing
plant with superior
monitoring and control
Ravendra Singh, Jun Zhang, Marianthi Ierapetritou and Rohit Ramachandran
The State University of New Jersey
There is a growing interest in manufacturing the pharmaceutical product continuously1. Along with other
advantages2, it provides an appropriate platform to implement suitable monitoring and control architecture, to
improve the product quality and minimise product rejection and operating expenses. Continuous pharmaceutical
manufacturing can be also considered as a data rich operation since data is continuously generated from the
substantial experiments employed in the process development activities or process operation. Therefore, a
systematic framework is needed through which suitable sensing and control architectures can be designed,
developed, evaluated and implemented into a continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing plant. In addition, an
efficient data management system is required for data storage, organisation and subsequent applications.
The objective of this article is to introduce a continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing process and pilot plant,
and highlight the process analytical technology (PAT), control and data management system integrated with it.
The pharmaceutical industry is a global business sector with around
37
CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURING
pharmaceutical
industry
is
currently
Figure 1: Continuous direct compaction tablet manufacturing pilot-plant (adapted from Singh et al.6): (1) feeders,
(2) co-mill and blender, and (3) tablet press
material flow. The top level is used for feeder placement and powder
storage, the middle level is used for delumping and blending, and the
between components.
enough to pass through the holes in the screen and leave the mill.
and the lubricant feeder is added after the mill to prevent over-
The co-mill eliminates any large, soft lumps within the powder,
lubrication of the formulation in the mill. These feed streams are then
(route one), dry granulation using roller compaction (route two) or wet
the outlet from the blender is fed to the tablet press via a rotary feed
create a tablet. The NIR sensor for inline monitoring of blend uniformity,
of the powder blends; route two is particularly suitable for cases where
new powder layer can form by displacing the old powder layers.
38
CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURING
The integration of the chute with the blender
and sensor is reported in Singh et al.
Integration of PAT
Along with other monitoring tools, PAT
has been integrated with the continuous
pharmaceutical manufacturing plant described
to enable real-time monitoring of critical
Predictive model
clustering results
A set of relevant data
will be used by
multivariate data analysis
algorithm
method is used for online monitoring of the powder level and the drug
control the main compression force of the tablet press. This control
loop7. The NIR sensor has been used for inline real-time monitoring
master controller is weight and it generates the set point of the main
compression force.
square (PLS) models are used to predict the powder bulk density and
In order to implement the control system into the pilot plant, the
the NIR calibration models for blend density and drug concentration
39
CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURING
or operation units, as a set of human-readable
specifications. These specifications can be
organised as an XML file, which is a standard
data vehicle for none-gap communication
between various database/systems. Each data
point is an XML file with unique filename as the
ID, and in each XML file, the specifications are
organised as a hierarchical structure whereby
each node represents a specification, i.e., a
specific measurements name with associated
value. Ontology representation describes
the relationship of terminologies referred in the
data, e.g., paracetamol is a type of API. These
terminologies and relationships are usually
visualised as a hierarchical structure that has
been discussed in detail10,11.
Ontology establishes logic interactions
between different data to facilitate data search
and selection.
The search function is developed to
retrieve desired process data, and it consists of
a user interface and search algorithm. The user
Figure 4: Use of PLS algorithm to predict powder density after co-mill in gPROMs platform
interface allows the user to define which data should be studied and
to 10mm. As shown in the figure, after initial lag time the fill depth
for data searching, e.g., 10% of defined viscosity. The ontology can also
as main and pre-compression forces, the fill depth has been changed
cell data, which could expand the search space for further data
The achieved fill depth is also shown in the figure. As shown, the main
and pre-compression forces follow the profile of fill depth with some
confirm the data satisfies the users definitions, which would be used
12
clustering and K-mean clustering can quickly sort data into groups that
be developed that can be used to analyse the process and design the
the data; regression algorithms, e.g., PLS, can harness returned data to
control system.
model could ensure the completeness of process data, e.g., the missing
understanding.
parameters along with PAT and control have been studied. Tablet
tablets/h. The set point, along with achieved production rate, is shown
raw material properties data were stored in excel files that can be
in Figure 3b (page 39). The fill depth has been changed from 8mm
40
CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURING
programming languages, Python (i.e., data representation and search
function) and C++ (i.e., PLS algorithm), which are selected due to
conformability of gPROMs platform.
For a case study, the flowsheet model of continuous direct
compaction tablet manufacturing process was used. The bulk density of
powder coming out from the co-mill was considered for prediction
using the PLS method because it is the key attribute and currently there
is no other model available to predict it. Sixteen data points of powder
properties were stored in the database, and the search function
returned eight data points consisting of six PLS input variables: namely
API, excipient, API concentration, excipient concentration, feeder
throughput and co-mill rotation speed, and one PLS output variable
namely powder density. These returned data points were harnessed by
PLS algorithm to establish a prediction model to predict powder density
for the corresponding information defined in the simulation. The whole
process and results are given in Figure 4 (page 41). The predicted density
was calculated by experimental facts rather than theoretical
assumption/calculation which makes the simulation results closer to
the real situation.
Conclusions
A novel continuous pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing process
integrated with real-time monitoring tools, advanced control and a
systematic data management system has been developed. The process
operation dynamics have been analysed. The data management
framework described in this paper shows that reusing the process data
for process development is a promising approach and a flexible one,
which can easily be implemented and integrated with pharmaceutical
companies current data management systems. It provides a costeffective big data strategy to accelerate a products commercialisation.
Future work will include the implementation of a combined feedforward/feed-back control system into the pilot plant.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering
Research Center on Structured Organic Particulate Systems, through
Grant NSF-ECC 0540855.
References
1.
Lee, SL, OConnor, TF, Yang, X, Cruz, CN, Chatterjee, S, Madurawe, RD, Moore, CM V, Yu,
LX, Woodcock, J. Modernizing Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: from Batch to Continuous
Production. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2015; 10, 191-199
2.
3.
Paul, SM, et al. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand
challenge. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2010; 9(3): 203-214
4.
5.
6.
7.
9.
41
PAT
44 Process analytical control:
An overview
David P. Elder, GlaxoSmithKline and JPAG
48 Expert View
Kaiser Optical Systems
50 Monitoring, understanding
and assessing
pharmaceutical process
and product quality
Huiquan Wu, Bogdan Kurtyka, Geoffrey Wu,
Jennifer A. Maguire, Rapti Madurawe, Christine
M.V. Moore, Robert Iser, Mansoor A. Khan,
Robbe C. Lyon, Patrick Faustino, Lucinda Buhse,
Sau Lee, Lawrence Yu, United States Food and
Drug Administration
57 PAT Roundtable
Moderated by David P. Elder,
GlaxoSmithKline and JPAG
unpict / Shutterstock.com
SPONSORS
43
akank / Shutterstock.com
An overview of process
analytical control
David P. Elder
GlaxoSmithKline and JPAG
In a quality by design (QbD) paradigm (ICH Q81, Q92 and Q103) it is envisioned that a full understanding of critical
quality attributes (CQAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) will facilitate better product understanding and
thereby improved process control. However, critical material attributes (CMAs), CQAs and CPPs are intrinsically
complex and exhibit multi-factorial inter-relationships, which in turn necessitate multi-variate control strategies,
such as multivariate data analysis (MVDA) and statistically-based design of experiments (DOE). The United States
Food and Drug Administration foresees that an integrated approach to product and process understanding based
on these methods4, together with real-time process analytical technology (PAT5), should facilitate better
understanding, monitoring and process control6.
Facilitating enhanced process understanding
The FDA has defined PAT as a system for designing, analysing, and
at-line PAT process monitoring can evolve into real-time release testing
44
desired state. The key concepts of PAT are multivariate data acquisition
PAT can either monitor one unit operation, two interconnecting unit
operations or, ideally, the entire process. This article will provide a brief
this stage can often be challenging since there are numerous variables
Tabletting
The FDA has advocated the usage of PAT during crystallisation and
uniformity of the resultant drug product and the latter is defined by all
approaches
chemical imaging analysis (CIS) have been applied34,35, but the quantities
15
17,18
21
16,22
Blending
control both API and excipients33. Indeed, for certain dosage forms,
release products.
of blend homogeneity27.
45
weight gain of the tablets, e.g., ca. 3% w/w target for non-functional
dosage form. Wirges et al.46 were able to demonstrate that their in-line
model and the former correlated well with the off-line reference HPLC
assay. The authors indicated that this was the first time in-line Raman
36
37
push-pull OROS system to provide off-line PAT control and correlate the
time for the autoclave cycle by the quality assurance group, together
Raman has also been used as a PAT tool for film coating, offering
approaches lead to RTRT and a design space is not needed for RTRT.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FDA. 2004. Guidance for Industry. PAT- A framework for innovative pharmaceutical
development, manufacturing and quality assurance
6.
7.
Vogt FG, Kord AS. Development of Quality-by-Design analytical methods. J. Pharm Sci,
100, 797-812
8.
Skibsted ETS, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, Witte DT. Examples of NIR based real time release
in tablet manufacturing. J Pharm Biomned Anal. 2007, 43, 1297-1305
9.
Dalmasso G. Product real-time release for the microbial critical quality attribute using QbD
approach. Am Pharm Rev. 2008; 11, 10-16
10. Tirumalai R, Porter D. Terminal sterilization and potential for parametric release. Am Pharm
Rev. 2005; 8, 26-31
11. Variankaval N, Cote AS, Doherty MF. From form to function: crystallisation of active
pharmaceutical ingredients. AIChE J. 2008; 54, 1682-1688
12. Lamberto, DJ. Controlling powder properties during scale-up of agitated drying systems.
AAPS Meeting, San Diego, 02-06th November, 2014; https://zerista.s3.amazonaws.com/
item_files/ed21/attachments/31745/original/304.pdf. Accessed on 24th September, 2015
13. Saleemi AN, Steele G, Pedge NI, Freeman A, Nagy ZK. Enhancing crystalline properties of
a cardiovascular active pharmaceutical ingredient using a process analytical technology based
crystallization feedback control strategy. Int J Pharm. 2012; 430, 56-64
14. Barrett P, Smith B, Worlitschek J, Bracken, V, OSullivan B, OGrady D. A review of the use
of process analytical technology for the understanding and optimization of production batch
crystallization processes. Org Process Res Dev. 2005; 9, 348-355
15. Yu LX, Lionberger RA, Raw AS, DCosta, R, Wu, H, Hussain, AS. Applications of process
46
analytical technology to crystallisation processes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004; 56, 349-369
16. Jia C, Ying, Q Zhang, M,Wang J, Shen Z. Polymorphic transformation of pravastatin
sodium monitored using combined online FBRM and PVM. Org. Process Res Dev. 2008;
12, 1223-1228
17. Simon LL, Oucherif KA, Nagy ZK, Ungerbuhler, K. Bulk video imaging based on
multivariate image analysis, process control chart and acoustic signal assisted nucleation
detection. Chem Eng Sci. 2010; 65, 4983-4995
18. Simon LL, Oucherif KA, Nagy ZK, Ungerbuhler K. Histogram matching, hypothesis
testing, and statistical control-chart-assisted nucleation detection using bulk video imaging
for optimal switching between nucleation and seed condition steps, ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;
49, 9932-9944
19. Simon LL, Myerson AS. Continuous anti-solvent plug flow crystallization of a fast growing
API. In: Proceedings of the 18th international symposium on industrial crystallization (ISIC
18), 13-16th September 2011, Zurich, Switzerland
20. Saleemi AN, Rielly CD, Nagy ZK. Comparative investigation of supersaturation and
automated direct nucleation control of crystal size distributions using ATR_UV/vis
spectroscopy and FBRM. Cryst Growth Des. 2012; ADD
21. Borissova A, Khan S, Mahmud T, Roberts KJ, Andrews J, Dallin P, Chen Z, Morris, J. In situ
measurements of solution concentration during the batch cooling crystallization of
L-glutamic acid using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics. Crystal Growth
Des. 2009; 9, 692-706
22. Abu Bakar, MR, Nagy ZK, Rielly CD. Seeded batch cooling crystallization with temperature
cycling for the control of size uniformity and polymorphic purity of sulfathiazole crystals.
Org Process Res Dev. 2009; 13, 1343-1356
23. Berman J, Blanchard JA. Blend uniformity and unit dose sampling, Drug Dev Ind Pharm.
1995.; 21, 125724. Muzzio FJ, Robinson P, Wightman C, Brone D. Sampling practices in powder blending.
Int J Pharm. 1997; 155, 15325. FDA. 2007. Draft Guidance: Powder blends and finished dosage forms stratified in-process
dosage unit sampling and assessment
26. Berman J, Schoeneman A, et al. Unit dose sampling: A tale of two thieves, Drug Dev Ind
Pharm. 1996; 22, 1121-
PAT plays a fundamental role within the QbD paradigm, but it is not a
new approach, since process analysis and control have been used in API
50
designated process:
27. Lai C-K, Holt D, Leung JC, Cooney CL, Raju GK, Hansen H. Real time and noninvasive
monitoring of dry powder blend homogeneity. AIChE J. 2001; 47, 2618-2622
coating thickness and surface area of pharmaceutical pellets using fluorescence microscopy
and image analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2000; 20, 325-339
28. Hailey PA, Doherty P, Tapsell P, Oliver T, Aldridge PK. Automated system for the on-line
monitoring of a powder blending process using near infra-red spectroscopy. Part I. system
development and control. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1996; 14, 551-559
41. Gendre C, Genty M, Boiret M, Julien M, Menier L, Lecoq O, Baron M, Chamiade P, Pean
JM. Development of a process analytical technology (PAT) for in-line monitoring of film
thickness and mass of coating materials during a pan coating operation. Eur J Pharm Sci.
2011; 43, 244-250
42. Gendre C, Genty M, Chamiade P, Pean JM. Real-time predictions of drug release and end
point detection of a coating operation by in-line near infrared measurements, Int J Pharm.
2011; 421, 237-243
43. Malaterre V, Pederson M, Ogorka J, Gurny R, Loggia N, Taday, PF. Terahertz pulsed imaging,
a novel process analytical tool to investigate the coating requirements of push-pull osmotic
systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008; 74, 21-25
44. Mller J, Knop K, Wirges M, Kleinebudde P. Validation of raman spectroscopic procedure in
agreement with ICH Q2 with considering the transfer to real time monitoring of an active
coating process. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010; 53, 884-894
45. Mller J, Knop K, Thies J, Uerpmann C, Kleinebudde P. Feasibility of Raman spectroscopy
as a PAT tool in active coating. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2010; 36, 234-243
46. Wirges M, Funke A, Serno P, Knop K, Kleinebudde P. Monitoring of an active coating
process for two layer tablets-model dependent strategies. J Pharm Sci. 2013; 102, 556-564
47. EMA. 2012. Guideline on real time release testing (formerly guideline on parametric release),
EMA/CHMP/QWP/811210/2009-Rev1, 29th March 2012
48. Moore CMV. 2011. Regulatory perspective on real time release testing (RTRT). AAPS
Annual Meeting, Washington DC, 27 October 2011 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/
AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/UCM301055.pdf.
Accessed on 28th September, 2015
49. Rantanen J, Khinast J. The future of pharmaceutical manufacturing sciences. J Pharm Sci.
2015; DOI: 10.1002/jps.24594
50. Yu L, Amidon G, Khan M, Hoag S, Polli J, Raju GK, Woodcock J. Understanding
pharmaceutical quality by design, AAP J. 2014; 16, 771-783
51. Page T, Dubina H, Fillipi G, Guidat R, Patnaik S, Poechlauer P, Shering P,
Guinn, M, McDonnell, P, Johnston C. Equipment and analytical companies meeting
continuous challenges, May 20-21, 2014 Continuous Manufacturing symposium, J Pharm
Sci, 104, 821-831
47
The diverse structures that have been quantified by Raman, from the
Conclusions
References
1.
2.
3.
CJ Strachan, T Rades, KC Gordon and J Rantanen, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2007; 59, 179192
4.
5.
6.
J Mller, K Knop, M Wirges and P Kleinebudde, J Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010; 53,
884894
7.
8.
9.
F Wang, JA Wachter, FJ Antosz and KA Berglund, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2000; 4,
391395
Blend uniformity
Jayawickrama et al used Raman spectroscopy to predict API content in
granules at the feed frame of the tablet press, which is the last step
before tablet compression 10. Raman-calculated blended granule
uniformity and HPLC-calculated content uniformity of the final tablets
were found to be in good agreement. Predicted API of the granules as
they passed from the hopper into the feed during tablet compression
correlated well with the nominal API concentration of the blend. Raman
data were used to isolate the compression start time and end time as
48
SHOW PREVIEW
30th International
forum and exhibition
IFPAC is the essential meeting place for the latest developments in process analytical technology (PAT) and quality by
design (QbD) within the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and related industries. For over 25 years, IFPAC has brought
together leading experts in industry, academia, research institutions, manufacturing and supplying, as well as
international and United States regulatory agencies to discuss the latest trends in technologies, standards and controls.
High-profile speakers at IFPAC will include those from the FDA, EMA,
Technical Sessions
implementation/QbD experience.
guidance. It will be held in conjunction with the Food Quality, Safety and
Analysis Symposium.
characterisation/engineering.
need of the Theory of Sampling (TOS) for PAC, PAT, Process Monitoring
QC and Product QA, by Kim H. Esbensen, PhD, Research Professor,
Full exhibition services will be provided during the three day exhibit.
49
0 piotr_pabijan / Shutterstock.com
Monitoring, understanding
and assessing pharmaceutical
process and product quality
1,2
2,4
Huiquan Wu , Bogdan Kurtyka , Geoffrey Wu , Jennifer A. Maguire , Rapti Madurawe , Christine M.V. Moore , Robert Iser ,
1,a
1,b
1
1
5
5
Mansoor A. Khan , Robbe C. Lyon , Patrick Faustino , Lucinda Buhse , Sau Lee and Lawrence Yu
Process analytical technology (PAT) is a groundbreaking approach for pharmaceutical innovation in the 21st century,
representing a new dimension of pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality regulation. It provides unprecedented
opportunities for the pharmaceutical sector to monitor, understand and assess pharmaceutical manufacturing
processes and ensure product quality. In this article, we briefly discuss the history of PAT. A critical scientific review
and technological analysis is conducted in three areas: scientific excellence achieved by the global PAT community;
enabling technology available for PAT development; and current industry trends in utilising PAT for materials
characterisation, process/product development and understanding, and manufacturing. It is hoped that these three
areas together provide the necessary science and technology to support future PAT development. Finally, some of
the future challenges and opportunities for PAT progress are discussed in the spirit of further stimulating the
development and adaption of PAT in the pharmaceutical and academic communities from both pharmaceutical
engineering and public health perspectives.
Brief history of PAT
the PAT Initiative2 celebrated its 13th anniversary this year. Two broad
quality by design (QbD)4-5, were launched after the PAT Initiative. During
50
concept paper13.
in recent reviews
of control.
14-18
IgG3 cell culture process in real time was demonstrated via a top-down
in Figure 1, Figure 2 (page 53) and Figure 3 (page 55) with the main
The advantages of the PAT approach in this case study lies in gaining
events such as nucleation and crystal growth occur; (ii) the derived
vessels and control of crystal size; and (iii) the process design space,
downstream processing.
(XRF) spectroscopy.
51
sampling devices has made FT-IR ATR ubiquitous in both laboratory and
spatial resolution.
described below.
held analysers, allows the use of this technology for raw materials
Solution Advantages
Optimized In-ow Liquids
and Solids Analysis
Transferability from Laboratory,
to Scale-up, to Pilot Plant
mm to micron Sampling
Meets GLP and GMP Requirements
Continuous
Manufacturing of Solids
Kaisers PhAT Probe for Solids in Unit
Operations Production
Tablet Coating
Polymorphism / Crystallization
Process-induced Transformations
Extrusion Monitoring
process control.
applications, has been observed over the past ten years. Such a
PAT analysers provide timely results that can be used for feedback or
process using PAT tools during the product lifecycle10. Specifically, the
control. They also deliver in-process analytical results for RTRT, either
directly or as input for models. One PAT analyser often has multiple
the finished drug product; (ii) in-line blend uniformity (BU) monitoring
functions, providing data for both control and RTRT at the same time.
Table 1: List of spectroscopic techniques that have been, or potentially, are to be adopted as PAT tools (adopted from Reference38)
Techniques
Quantitative Data
Qualitative Data
Raw material ID
Mid-Infrared
Near-Infrared
Yes, hydrogen
bonding makes it
sensitive to
all changes
Fourier-Transform
Infrared (FTIR)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes. Promising
in bioreactor cell
culture monitoring
Yes
Chemical Imaging
(NIR and Raman)
Yes
Yes
Far-Infrared
or Terahertz
Possible with
chemometric
algorithms
Yes, sensitive to
crystalline materials
Yes, intermolecular
THz absorption
makes it easy to
detect interfaces or
layer boundaries
Yes
Raman
Yes, as quantitative
as NIR
Yes, insensitive
to water
Yes, hydrogen
bonding seen
Near-Line Capability
53
determine end-point.
the opportunities.
the FDAs PAT Guidance has been adopted in a broad sense, i.e., using
anticipated that more NIR and other PAT tools will find increased use in
clinically relevant CQAs of the final drug product are identified, it may be
equipment capability and operators. PAT can also be used to detect and
21
, a key issue
23,34
Concluding remarks
The first decade of the PAT journey has been characterised by global
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Dr. Janet Woodcock, Director of the Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the FDA, for leading the FDAs
edgements are extended to: Dr. Ajaz S. Hussain who championed the PAT
Initiative; to the original FDA PAT Teams (including the PAT Steering
55
Author affiliations
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
a.
b.
Team and the FDA-Novartis PAT Design Space CRADA Team for their multiyear innovative works. Huiquan kindly acknowledges Drs. A. M. DSa, S.
Chatterjee, F. Weichold, V. Vilker (retired), Mr. F. Friedman, the AIChE PD2M
Forum leadership team, a team of subject matter experts at Actavis Florida
for technical discussions on innovative manufacturing technologies, and
colleagues and fellows at the Division of Product Quality Research (DPQR,
OTR, OPQ, CDER, FDA) for their outstanding support. All of the PAT
practitioners in the global community across the pharmaceutical industry,
developers of technologies and providers of PAT instrumentation,
academia, and governmental agencies, including those original works not
being cited here due to space constraints are appreciated for their creative
works over the past decade.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
56
FDA, 2004. Pharmaceutical CGMP for the 21st Century-A Risk-Based Approach. Final Report
FDA, 2004. PAT A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Development, Manufacturing,
and Quality Assurance
J Woodcock and R Woosley. The FDA Critical Path Initiative and Its Influence on New Drug
Development. Annu. Rev. Med. 2008; 59:112
FDA/ICH, 2009.Q8(R2)
FDA/ICH, 2012. Q11 Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances
J Woodcock, Evolution in FDAs Approach to Pharmaceutical Quality. Available at:
http://www.gphaonline.org/media/cms/Janet_Woodcock.pdf (accessed on 09/06/2015)
J Woodcock. The Concept of Pharmaceutical Quality. Amer. Pharm. Rev. 2004; Nov./Dec.,1-3
LX Yu. Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding,
and Control. Pharm. Res. 2008; Apr; 25(4):781-91
S Chatterjee, 2014. Regulatory Considerations for RTRT (Real Time Release Testing) based
Control Strategy-ONDQA Perspective. AAPS eLearning Webinar
G Allison, YT Cain, C Cooney, T Garcia, TG Bizjak, O Holte, N Jagota, B Komas, E Korakianiti,
D Kourti, R Maduraew, E Morefield, F Montgomery, M Nasr, W Randolph, JL. Robert, D Rudd,
D Zezza. Regulatory and Quality Considerations for Continuous Manufacturing. May 20-21,
2014 Continuous Manufacturing Symposium. J. Pharm. Sci. 104: 803-812
S Lee, T OConnor, X Yang, C Cruz, S Chatterjee, R Madurawe, CV Moore, L Yu, J Woodcook.
Modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing: From batch to continuous production. J. Pharm.
Innov. 2015; 10:191-199
FDA. Advancing Regulatory Science at FDA: A Strategic Plan. FDA, 2011. ICH, 2014. Final
Concept Paper Q12: Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product
Lifecycle Management
LX Yu, RA Lionberger, AS Raw, R DCosta, H Wu, AS Hussain. Application of process
analytical technology to crystallization process. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004; 56(3):349-69
LX Yu, G Amidon, MA Khan, SW Hoag, J Polli, GK Yu, and J Woodcock, Understanding
Pharmaceutical Quality by Design. AAPS J. 2014; 16(4): 771-783
AS Rathore, H Winkle. Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;
27(1): 26-34
J Rantanen, J Khinast. The Future of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Sciences. J. Pharm. Sci.
2015; DOI 10.1002/jps.24594
LL Simon, H Pataki, et al. Assessment of Recent Process Analytical Technology (PAT) Trends:
A Multi-author Review. Org. Process Res. & Dev. 2015; 19(1):3-62
H Wu and AS Hussain. Use of PAT for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Crystallization Process
Control. Conference Proceedings of the 16th International Federation of Automatic Control
(IFAC) World Congress (CD-ROM). Edited by P Horacek, M Simandl, and P Zitek. Prague,
Czech Republic, July 4-9, 2005
H Wu, E Heilweil, AS Hussain, MA Khan. Process Analytical Technology (PAT): Effects of
Instrumental and Compositional Variables on Terahertz Spectral Data Quality to Characterize
Pharmaceutical Materials and Tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 2007; 343(Nos1-2):148-158
H Wu, E Heilweil, AS Hussain, MA Khan. Process Analytical Technology (PAT): Quantification
Approaches in Terahertz Spectroscopy for Pharmaceutical Application. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007;
97(2): 970-84
H Wu, AS Hussain, and MA Khan. Process Control Perspective for Process Analytical
Technology: Integration of Chemical Engineering Practice into Semiconductor and
Pharmaceutical Industries. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2007; 194: 760-779
H Wu, M Tawakkul, M White, and MA Khan. Quality-by-Design (QbD): An Integrated
Multivariate Approach for the Component Quantification in Powder Blends. Int. J. Pharm. 2009;
372(1-2):39-48
H Wu and MA Khan. Quality-by-Design (QbD): An Integrated Approach for Evaluation of
Powder Blending Process Kinetics and Determination of Powder Blending End-Point. J. Pharm.
Sci. 2009; 98(8):2784-2798
D Xiang, J Berry, S Buntz, P Gargiulo, J Cheney, Y Joshi, B Wabuyele, H Wu, M Hamed, and
MA Khan. Robust Calibration Design in the Pharmaceutical Quantitative Measurements with
Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy: Avoiding the Chemometric Pitfalls. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009;
98(3):1155-1166
D Xiang, R LoBrutto, H Valthorsson, J Berry, J Cheney, Y Joshi, B Wabuyele, RC Lyon, H Wu,
and MA Khan. Evaluation of Transmission and Reflectance Modalities for Measuring Content
Uniformity of Pharmaceutical Tablets with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 2009;
63(1): 1-15
Y Sulub, B Wabuyele, P Gargiulo, J Pazdan, J Cheney, J Berry, A Gupta, R Shah, H Wu,
and M Khan. Real-time On-line Blend Uniformity Monitoring Using Near-Infrared
Reflectance Spectroscopy: A Noninvasive Off-line Calibration Approach. J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal. 2009; 49: 48-54
H Wu and M Khan. Quality-by-Design (QbD): An Integrated Process Analytical Technology
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
(PAT) Approach for Real-Time Monitoring and Mapping the State of a Pharmaceutical
Co-precipitation Process. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010; 99(3): 1516-1534
H Wu, M White, MA Khan. Quality-by-Design (QbD): An Integrated Process Analytical
Technology (PAT) Approach for a Dynamic Pharmaceutical Co-precipitation Process
Characterization and Process Design Space Development. Int. J. Pharm. 2011; 405:63-78
H Wu and MA Khan. Quality-by-Design (QbD): An Integrated Process Analytical Technology
(PAT) Approach to Determine the Nucleation and Growth Mechanisms during a Dynamic
Pharmaceutical Co-precipitation Process. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011; 100 (5): 1969-1986
H Wu and MA Khan. THz Spectroscopy: An Emerging Technology for Pharmaceutical
Development and Pharmaceutical Process Analytical Technology (PAT) Applications. J. Mol.
Struct. 2012; 1020: 112-120
H Wu, M White, R Berendt, R Foringer, MA Khan. An Integrated PAT Approach for Nucleation
Induction Time Measurement and Nucleation Mechanism Assessment for a Dynamic MultiComponent Pharmaceutical Antisolvent Crystallization System. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014; 53
(4) :16881701
H Wu, Z Dong, H Li, MA Khan. An Integrated Process Analytical Technology (PAT) Approach
for Pharmaceutical Crystallization Process Understanding to Ensure Product Quality and Safety:
FDA Scientists Perspective. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2015; 19(1) : 89-101
H Wu, M White, MA Khan. An Integrated Process Analytical Technology (PAT) Approach for
Process Dynamics-related Measurement Error and Process Design Space Development for a
Pharmaceutical Powder Blending Bed. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2015; 19(1) :215-226
H Wu, RC Lyon, MA Khan, R Voytilla, J Drennen. Integration of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and
Mechanistic Modeling for Predicting Film-Coating and Dissolution of Modified Release Tablets.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015; 54 (22) :60126023
H Wu, E Read, M White, B Chavez, K Brorson, C Agarabi, MA Khan. Real Time Monitoring of
Bioreactor mAb IgG3 Cell Culture Process Dynamics via Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy: Implications for Enabling Cell Culture Process Analytical Technology. Frontiers
of Chemical Science and Engineering. 2015; 9 (3): 386-406
KA Bakeev, ed. Process Analytical Technology: Spectroscopic Tools and Implementation Strategies for the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries. 2nd ed., John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd, 2010
EW Ciurczak. A Spectroscopy Field Guide for PAT. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing. 2008;
July/Aug., p.18-26
DC Watts, A Afnan, H Wu, R Uppoor, AS Hussain. Process Analytical Technology (PAT):
The FDAs Year in Review. AAPS News Magazine, 7(3) :25
L Bush, M LHeureux, and S Brown, 2015. How Are Atomic and Molecular Spectroscopy
Techniques Advancing? Spectroscopy, 30(8): 8-13
FR Doucet, PJ Faustino, S Mohamad, RC Lyon. Quantitative molecular analysis with molecular
bands emission using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and chemometrics. J. Anal.
At. Spectrom. 2008; 23(5): 694-701
T Priyanka, V UM Rao, A Ajitha. A review on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy.
Int. J. Pharm. Res. Anal. 2014; 4(5): 335-340
RC Lyon, DS Lester, EN Lewis, E Lee, LX Yu, EH Jefferson, AS Hussain. Near-infrared spectral
imaging for quality assurance of pharmaceutical products: analysis of tablets to assess powder
blend homogeneity. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2002; 3(3) article 17
MT Tham, GA Montague, AJ Morris, and PA Lant. Soft-sensors for process estimation and
inferential control. J. Process Cont. 1991; 1: 3-14
P Facco, F Doplicher, F Bezzo, M Barolo. Moving average PLS soft sensor for online
product quality estimation in an industrial batch polymerization process. J. Process. Cont. 2009;
19: 520-529
JCB Gonzaga, LAC Meleior, C Kiang, RM Filho. ANN-based soft-sensor for real-time
process monitoring and control of an industrial polymerization process. Comput. Chem. Eng.
2009; 33: 43-49
P Kadlec, B Gabrys, S Strandt. Data-driven Soft Sensors in the process industry. Comput. Chem.
Eng. 2009; 33: 795-814
WH Lipkea, JH Johnson, CT Vuk. The Physical and Chemical Character of Diesel Particulate
EmissionsMeasurement Techniques and Fundamental Considerations. SAE International.
SAE Technical Paper 780108, 1978, doi:10.4271/780108
FDA CDER Manual of Policies and Procedures (MaPP 5015.10), Effective
11/08/2014.Chemistry Review of Question-based Review (QbR) Submissions
FDA, 2015. Guidance for Industry: Development and Submission of Near Infrared Analytical
Procedures (Draft)
FDA, 2015. Guidance for Industry: Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs
and Biologics
ICH, 2005. Q2(R1). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology
Verticalarray / Shutterstock.com
Albert Tulke
Karen Esmonde-White
PAT Department,
Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH
Moderator
David P. Elder, GlaxoSmithKline and JPAG
Hoehse: One solution could be to divide the spectral data into two
branches any spectral data that lead to any action on the product or
process will have to be stored completely, and all other data do not
Additionally, one could reduce the data load by only storing the
pull meaningful information from archived data. The first step towards
full spectra, since the first scores likely explain more than 95% of the
overall variations.
requirements. These solutions are often tailor made and put in place by
57
combines data from different origins into one database with a standard
Karen Esmonde-White
the United States Food and Drug Administration and the User
58
Gayvoronskaya_Yana / Shutterstock.com
method transferability.
Albert Tulke
Hoehse: There will not be a single standard technique that will meet all
have limits of detection below 0.2%, however the limits are not several
59
SHOW PREVIEW
SLAS is proud to present the Societys Fifth Annual Conference and Exhibition. Bringing together the best and
brightest minds vested in developing and using technology for life science R&D, SLAS2016 will serve as the epicenter
of science and technology for five days this January.
Information
Nowhere else will you have such convenient access to a wealth of new
information.
in the exhibition.
Innovation
Networking
SLAS2016 and reap the benefits of being a part of the SLAS community,
SLAS2016 will showcase what is coming and what has arrived and
not only during the conference, but for the other 360 days of the year.
Inspiration
much more.
Scientific programme
most impressive aircraft carriers. From stem to stern, the entire ship will
20 stories high, 1,000 ft. long, 64,000 ton, 212,000 horsepower aircraft
carrier while meeting old friends and making new professional contacts.
Career connections
Cellular Technologies;
Informatics; and
Micro/Nano Technologies.
Registration
SLAS2016 is pleased to offer significant registration discounts to
The exhibition
60
mindscanner / Shutterstock.com
REGULATORY INSIGHT
For many years, global markets had focused their attention on traditional sectors such as natural resources rather
than on life science companies, so initial public offerings (IPOs) for such companies were uncommon. The past few
years have, however, seen a sea-change and life science companies from biotech to medical devices firms have
come very much back into favour as the must-have stocks; with opportunities for significant upsides.
The turnaround started in 2013; the markets began to pick up that year and 66 life science IPOs were completed
globally. By 2014, there were an extraordinary 133 life sciences companies completing IPOs, raising some $11 billion.
The first quarter of 2015 seemed to show a dramatic downturn in life
suggesting that this presaged the closure of the biotech IPO window.
This was not to be the case, and the second quarter saw a resurgence;
June 2015 was the busiest month on the market for the sector in
15 years. During this month alone there were 35 companies that went
plan to combat the high price of prescription drugs. She was apparently
through United States IPOs, raking in some $5.9 billion. When, in early
responding to the news that Turing had acquired an older antibiotic and
61
REGULATORY INSIGHT
tweet there was a dramatic drop on the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. It
is clear that Clintons tweet hit a nerve since the sector had already
been concerned about drug pricing, but there appeared to have been a
Turning tides
So has the tide turned for the UK markets in the life science sector? It
Francisco and San Diego, for example, there are more than five times as
many drugs in development than in the UK. But does that matter? Is
biotech fund for London in June and Neil Woodfords new 700 million
notably, Australia.
Where to float
with a number of other vibrant hot spots. We also have well proven,
world-class management. All the ingredients are there, and whilst the
specialist that raised 200m through its IPO. Other significant 2014 floats
long-term capital might not yet support it, there is a strong investor
in May 2015 to raise $160 million on the London Stock Exchange rather
based in the same country. But, and these are the critical questions, will
a biotech business raise as much in the UK as it would if it were to go
public in the US; would the company achieve as high a valuation in the
UK as it would across the pond; and in the long term does a US float
help the business to develop more than a UK float would?
For all of the inroads the UK has made, particularly recently, the
US still remains the preferred global location for life science IPOs.
Accountancy firm,
2014 and overseas companies are continuing to move there. The main
Having a strong
management team,
preferably with a CEO
that has taken a
company public before
Ensuring a capable board
of directors is in place
time consuming. It is clearly much easier to put this into effect if you are
with experience
of the life science
sector and knowledge
of the relevant
market regulations
Law firm
sectors during 2015. And with a significantly larger investor and analyst
Underwriter
community, businesses may find it that much easier to tell their story in
the US. There is a lot less education required of the investor than is the
An experienced CFO
is in place
62
REGULATORY INSIGHT
sufficiently play the game may all too quickly fall out of favour in the
investors; they will also have to take significant time away from the
fairly ruthless. The volume of new deals coming to the table means that
the case wherever the float market is, but the impact of having to carry
Further afield
management team. This will usually mean two or three visits a year,
again taking time away from the day-to-day operations. Dealing with
the sector there as a result of the collapse of the gold price and the
ment within the company. Yet this is unlikely to deter ambitious and
raised Aus $35 million in August in its IPO, backed by its partner,
valuations that are being achieved there. But of no less significance are
provider, I-MED Radiology, making its IPO, which had been originally
slated to raise Aus $350 million. Integral Diagnostics did get a deal away
involved in.
but its float was priced very much at the lower end of expectations.
Whilst clearly affected by a wider life science market uncertainty, the
Australian market is significantly influenced by its close trade partner,
China, which is gong through a slow-down at the moment.
Flotation on an overseas market whether in the US or elsewhere
has its own challenges and costs to offset against these benefits. During
the pre-IPO phase the senior management team will have to carry out
63
allows clear cut identification in the majority of cases. For instance, the
when using long 16S rRNA gene sequence, but not when using partial
identification and typing services are that they want the most
cause of contamination.
performed well for years and still do for some species, phenotypic
failures, media fill test failures, etc., and we have solutions for all those
The future for microbial testing methods and tools relies on future
base pairs) is more reliable and more powerful for identification than
highly reliable and cost effective. Only then will customers expecta-
64
Tired of Your
Temps Bouncing?
t
www.eurons.com/pss
t
t
t
t
SpectroBAY
Efficient Process Control