SCOPE
CDO
CDO
21/01/2013
3
3
CDO CONCEPT
CDO
21/01/2013
4
4
CDO
21/01/2013
5
5
CDO
21/01/2013
6
6
Why CDO?
Urgent action is required to reduce fuel burn and make emissions
savings
financial to reduce operating costs to airlines
environmental - to reduce the release of greenhouse gas
emissions
Imperative to reduce aviation noise impact of our industry on the public
in general
CDO implementation is vital to enable activities necessary to implement
the European ATM Master Plan
CDO
21/01/2013
7
7
CDO
CDO
CDO
10
CDO
11
Schiphol Airport: AIRE-II Final Result Report: Trajectory Based Night Time CDOs
(March 2012) - CDO plus Planned Time of arrival from TOD
Approximately 74kg per flight (A330 B747 and B777)
Groningen Airport Eelde: NLR fuel consumption is about 25-40% lower during the last
45 km of the flight.
About 55kg for a Boeing B737B737-300/400
AIRBUS (FAST47): Minimum CO2 in Terminal Area (MINT) project -Curved noise
abatement approach (RNP AR 0.3) CDO from cruise level (with NOVAIR A321)
145kg per arrival
CDO
12
CDO
13
CDO
21/01/2013
14
14
Network Manager
CDO
21/01/2013
1515
15
CDO
21/01/2013
16
16
and the widespread availability of harmonised support tools for controllers, which will
ensure lateral and/or vertical segregation without impeding the optimum profile.
CDO
21/01/2013
17
17
CDO
21/01/2013
18
18
Issues
CDO facilitated but not flown
No harmonised or specified publication
requirements/guidelines (needed to ensure predictability)
No specific or harmonised phraseology (is it required?)
Individual airline SOPs/Cost Indexes differ different
approach speeds and profiles
CDO
19
CDO
20
CDO
21/01/2013
21
21
CDO
21/01/2013
22
22
?
S
N
O
I
T
S
E
U
Q
Y
AN
Brent Day, Veronica McMahon & Dirk de Winter
EUROCONTROL
CDO Implementation Team
Rue de la Fuse, 96
B-1130 Brussels
Belgium
Email:
brent.day@eurocontrol.int
veronica.mcmahon@eurocontrol.int
Tel: +32 (0)2 729 31 33
CDO
21/01/2013
23
23