Creating Value
Waste Reduction
The Waste reduction process begins with the question What can we do to
improve? Some answers may include:
Stop defective products at their source
Flow processes together or change the physical relationship of components
of the process
Eliminate excess material handling or costly handling steps
Eliminate or reduce pointless process steps
Reduce the time spent waiting for parts, orders, other people, or information
In manufacturing environments, these waste reductions create the benefits
of reduced manufacturing cycle time, reduced labor expenditures, improved
product quality, space savings, reduced inventory, and quicker response to
the customer. When waste is reduced or eliminated across the supply chain,
overall cycle time is improved, labor and staff costs are reduced, product
quality and delivery are improved, inventories are reduced, and customer
lead-times are shortened. The net effect is the entire supply chain is more
efficient and responsive to customer needs.
finished goods inventory. All quality inspections and checks are performed
within the process, rather than after production is complete. In this true
make-to-order scenario, all goods are shipped directly to the next link in the
supply chain when the trailer is full, and overproduction is not possible and
cannot be tolerated. No space is designated to store finished goods. The
system is not designed to carry them.
Applying one-piece flow and pull systems can reduce WIP dramatically. A
Kanban or visual signal for more goods to be moved forward to the next
process can accomplish this procedure. Although the ultimate goal is to
eliminate WIP, minimal WIP is normally the result. The elimination of
bottlenecks is one goal of a lean supply chain, but a bottleneck will always
exist to some degree. As a result, WIP must always exist in front of a
bottleneck or the bottleneck operation will be starved and will stop.
Raw material inventory is a different matter. Although the leanest
organizations have arranged just in time deliveries to support
manufacturing, this approach requires the absolute highest degree of
competency and coordination within the supply chain.
Reduced Costs
Traditional mass production tries to minimize unit costs by increasing total
production over the life cycle of the product. High development costs are the
result of this model. To recover the enormous development and initial capital
costs sunk into the product before it was produced, mass producers
forecast and run long production cycles for each SKU. Consumer
preferences and variety suffer in this scenario. Costs still need to be
minimized, but not at the expense of what more sophisticated consumers
now demand.
Improved Customer Satisfaction
Lean promotes minimizing new product development time and expense.
This delivers the product to market faster, making it easier to incorporate
current requirements into the product. Lean also promotes the use of less
capital-intensive machines, tools, and fixtures, which results in more
flexibility and less initial cost to recover. As a result, product life cycles may
be shorter and product developments incorporated in newer versions of the
product more frequently. Profitability does not suffer and brand loyalty is
increased, as customers prefer to buy products and services from a
perceived innovator.
Supply Chain as a Competitive Weapon
A strong supply chain enables the member companies to align themselves
with each other and to coordinate their continuous improvement efforts. This