PRACTICE
review
the
case,
and
in
the
process,
minimize
any
error
of
judgment.
(Neypes
v.
CA,
469
SCRA
633)
RULE
37:
NEW
TRIAL
OR
RECONSIDERATIONS
Motion
for
extension
Grounds
for
new
trial
You
can
never
move
for
extension
of
time
for
filing
an
MR/MNT
1. Fraud,
accident,
mistake
or
excusable
negligence
which
ordinary
prudence
This
rule
applies
to
all
courts
except
the
SC.
(Habaluyas
v.
Japson,
G.R.
70895,
1986)
could
not
have
guarded
against
and
by
reason
of
which
such
aggrieved
GSA:
dont
file
for
extension.
party
has
probably
been
impaired
in
his
rights;
or
2. Newly
discovered
evidence,
which
he
could
not,
with
reasonable
diligence,
Second
motion
have
discovered
and
produced
at
the
trial,
and
which
if
presented
would
Cannot
file
a
2nd
MR
probably
alter
the
result.
Can
file
a
2nd
motion
for
new
trial
BUT:
You
can
file
2nd
MR
of
interlocutory
order.
(Balanoba
v.
Madriaga,
G.R.
No.
Extrinsic
fraud
160109,
2005)
Fraud
that
amounts
to
deprivation
of
day
in
court
Affidavit
of
merit
Excusable
negligence
Must
attach
affidavit
of
merit
in
the
motion
for
new
trial;
otherwise,
proforma
e.g.
gross
negligence
of
lawyer
Note:
It
should
amount
to
extrinsic
fraud
or
deprivation.
What
if
a
verified
petition
is
filed
without
affidavit
of
merit?
It
is
equivalent
to
an
affidavit;
thus,
it
is
not
pro-forma.
(case?)
Mistake
Refers
to
mistake
of
fact.
But:
may
refer
to
mistake
of
law
if
difficult
question
of
No
new
matters
in
MR
law.
Dont
introduce
new
matters
in
MR.
Same
as
accident.
But,
dont
rehash
your
arguments.
If
rehashed
arguments,
it
is
pro-forma.
(Dacanay
v.
Alvendia)
Grounds
for
reconsideration
Exception:
the
circumstance
that
a
motion
for
reconsideration
deals
with
the
same
1. that
the
damages
awarded
are
excessive,
issues
and
arguments
posed
and
resolved
by
the
trial
court
in
its
decision
does
not
2. that
the
evidence
is
insufficient
to
justify
the
decision
or
final
order,
or
necessarily
mean
that
the
motion
must
be
characterized
as
merely
pro
forma.
3. that
the
decision
or
final
order
is
contrary
to
law.
(Marikina
Valley
v.
Flojo)
When
to
file
Period
for
MR
of
an
interlocutory
order
Within
the
period
to
file
an
appeal
Technically,
there
is
none.
But
file
within
15
days
anyway.
Reglementary
period
APPEALS
If
represented
by
counsel,
count
period
from
receipt
of
decision/order
by
counsel
of
record.
Appeal
is
statutory
right
Otherwise,
from
receipt
of
the
party.
Must
comply
with
the
requirements
under
the
law.
Fresh
period
rule
2
types
of
appeals
If
the
motion
is
denied,
the
movant
has
a
fresh
period
of
15
days
from
receipt
or
Appeal
by
right
as
long
as
you
comply
with
the
requirements,
you
can
notice
of
the
order
denying
or
dismissing
the
motion
for
reconsideration
within
compel
the
court
to
review
your
appeal
(Rule
41)
which
to
file
a
notice
of
appeal.
This
new
period
becomes
significant
if
either
a
Discretionary
appeal
court
can
preliminarily
dismiss
the
appeal
(Rule
45)
motion
for
reconsideration
or
new
trial
has
been
filed
but
was
denied
or
dismissed.
(Neypes
v.
CA,
469
SCRA
633)
In
an
appeal
under
Rule
41
may
the
RTC
dismiss
a
notice
of
appeal
where
it
can
be
shown
that
the
questions
raised
are
pure
questions
of
law
(Rule
45)?
Rationale
for
the
fresh
period
rule
NO.
RTC
must
grant
the
notice
of
appeal.
It
is
the
CA
which
will
decide
the
propriety
To
standardize
the
appeal
periods
provided
in
the
Rules
and
to
afford
fair
of
the
mode
of
appeal.
RTC
may
only
refuse
to
grant
the
notice
of
appeal
if
it
was
not
opportunity
to
appeal
their
cases,
and
to
give
the
trial
court
another
opportunity
to
made
within
the
reglementary
period
or
that
the
lawful
fees
were
not
paid.