Anda di halaman 1dari 11

1.

01
Plisetsky,D - Krasenkow,M Moscow 1980
27...Db1+! deflected White's knight from the c-file. White resigned
in view of 27...Db1+ 28.Cxb1 Tc1+. 0:1
1.02
Zlotnik,B - Krasenkow,M Moscow 1981
34...Dxf2+! dragging White's king into the knight fork 35.Rxf2 Ce4+
36.Rg1 Cxd6 and Black converted his extra pawn.
1.03
Krasenkow,M - Fedorov,A Leon 2001
44.Tg8+! cleared f8 and forced mate; 1:0
44.Tg8+ Rh6 (or 44...Rxg8 45.Df8# ) 45.Dh4+ Th5 46.Tf6+ Dxf6
47.Dxf6#.
1.04
Krasenkow,M - Karpov,A Wijk aan Zee 2003
29...Te1! deflected White's rook. White resigned in view of 29...Te1
30.Rg2 (or 30.Txe1 Dxf3# ) 30...Txf1 31.Rxf1 Dxf3+. 0:1
1.05
Krasenkow,M - Strutsovsky Moscow 1978
30...Txg2+! destroyed the white defences. After 30...Txg2+
31.Rxg2 Cf4+ White is mated or loses a queen. Therefore I resigned.
0:1
1.06
Korneev,O - Krasenkow,M Moscow 1987
40...Txh3+! Decoyed White's king; a typical tactical blow, which is
frequently seen in similar positions. White resigned in view of
40...Txh3+ 41.Rxh3 Dh1+ 42.Rg3 Dh4+ 43.Rf3 Dg4#. 0:1
1.07
Krasenkow,M - Salov,V Kislovodsk 1978
Black's unprotected f6-bishop suggests the solution: 33.Cxf5! Cxf5
34.De4. White regains the knight due to the skewer along the f-file
and ends up with an extra pawn and domination of light squares.
The game concluded: Cd6 35.cxd6 Rg7 36.Ac5 Tf8 37.Tdf2 Tce8
38.Tf5 Tf7 39.h4 Tef8 40.h5 Rg8 41.T5f2 Ag7 42.Dg6 Txf2
43.Txf2 Txf2 44.Axf2 Rf8 45.Ac5 e4 46.De6 and Black resigned.
1:0
1.08
Krasenkow,M - Brglez,R Ptuj 1989
16.Txc6! Cxc6 17.Dxd5 (a decisive double attack) Te8 18.Dxc6
Tc8 19.Dd5 a6 20.Cc3 Cxc3 21.bxc3 Txc3 22.Axa6 and White
soon won. 1:0
1.09
Krasenkow,M - Shestakov,S Moscow 1987
25.Dxc7! But not 25.Dxd7? Txd7 26.Txd7, when Black saves his
queen by means of Df8 27.Td8 Te8. 25...Dxc7 26.Txd7 regained
the queen while keeping an extra bishop, so Black resigned. 1:0
1.10
Krasenkow,M - Thejkumar,M Mumbai 2008
Black's queen is far away from his king, so 30.g6! was a decisive
clearance of the g5-square: hxg6 31.Cg5 Black has no checks and
can't protect his f7-pawn. Rh8 32.Da4! and Black resigned. After
32.Da4 Dxb2+ 33.Rh3 , Black is back-rank mated. 1:0
1.11
Krasenkow,M - Romaniuk,S Podolsk 1978
21...Dc6? was a decisive mistake due to 22.De4! Dxe4 23.Axe4
Axe4 24.Cxc5 Ac6 25.Txa6. White had thus gained a second
pawn and his queenside pawn avalanche soon decided the game.
1:0
1.12
Krasenkow,M - Nogly,C Dortmund 1992
34.Txd5! Destroying the defence of Black's king. Tc7 Or 34...exd5
35.Tb7+ with a quick mate. 35.Txc5 and Black resigned. 1:0
1.13
Krasenkow,M - Mikhalevski,V Saint Vincent 2000
16.Dxb5+! Black resigned in view of 16.Dxb5+ axb5 17.Axb5+ Dd7
18.Axd7+ Rxd7 19.Ce5+. 1:0
1.14
Krasenkow,M - Eremeev Moscow 1980
9.Axf7+! was a typical decoy blow followed by a double attack:
Rxf7 10.Cg5+ Re8 11.Df3 Ch6 12.Dxa8 Cc6 13.e6 Ae7 14.Te1
and Black resigned. 1:0
1.15
Bekman - Krasenkow,M Moscow 1981
With 14...Cxc4! Black removes the defender of the b5-pawn and
decoys White's knight into a pawn fork; a tactical trick, typical for the
Albin Counter-gambit, as was played in this game. After 15.Cxc4
axb5 16.Cxb6 Axb6, Black had no material advantage, but his
strong central pawns guaranteed him a clear plus. Subsequently,
Black won. 0:1
1.16
Krasenkow,M - Archangelsky,M Moscow 1982
White fatally exposes Black's poorly protected king by means of two
exchange sacrifices: 21.Txc2! Dxc2 22.Dxf4! Dxb1+ 23.Rg2 f5
(otherwise 24 Qxf7+ or 24 Qf6) 24.Dc7 and Black resigned. 1:0
1.17
Krasenkow,M - Miton,K Polish Championship, Warsaw 2003
Black destroys his opponent's defences by means of a knight sacrifice:
36...Cxg4!
White resigned in view of 36...Cxg4 37.Rxg4 Tf4+ 38.Rh5 Rg7,
followed by mate on h4 or huge material losses. 1:0
1.18
Ivanov,J - Krasenkow,M Pazardzhik 1988
22...Txd2! Once again destruction of the defence. If 22...Txd2
23.Cxd2 (or 23.Txd2 Axf3 ) 23...Axe2+ 24.Rxe2 Dxf2+ , etc. Therefore
White resigned. 0:1
1.19
Krasenkow,M - Frog,I Moscow 1985
After 12...Ch5? 13.Cxd5! , White won a pawn, since cxd5? 14.Ac7
would have lead to the loss of the queen. This tactical trick has been
seen plenty of times in this so-called Carlsbad structure, but there
will always be new victims.
1.20
Krasenkow,M - Kovalev,A Blagoveshchensk 1988
32...Cxg3! destroyed the defences of White's king and cleared the
e4- square for the black queen. 32...Df3? 33.Dg2 is ineffective, but
Black had a better option.; White resigned, since if 32...Cxg3
33.fxg3 then De4, threatening both 34...Rh1+ and 34...Qxe3+. 0:1
1.21
Krasenkow,M - Westerinen,H Palma de Mallorca 1989
18.Ag5! This deflecting double attack wins Black's poorly placed
knight on h4. f6 Alternatively, 18...Dxg5 19.Dc8+ Re7 20.De8+ Rf6
21.Ce4+; or 18...Cf3+ 19.Dxf3 Dxg5 20.Da8+. 19.Axh4 h5 20.Ag3
e5 21.gxh5 Txh5 22.Ce4 g6 23.Cxd6 cxd6 24.Ta1 and Black resigned.
1:0
1.22
Krasenkow,M - Steinbacher,M Ostend 1990
23.Cc6! was a double interference motif. White is threatening both
24 Qxe6+ (if Black takes the knight with a minor piece) and (in the
event of Dd6 ) 24.Axb5, with decisive material gains in both cases.
1:0
1.23
Krasenkow,M - Lehti,J Jyvaskyla 1991
Of course, Black's awful knight on g4 attracts White's attention:
16.e6! Another interference sacrifice. Txe6 17.Dxg4! Txe1+
18.Txe1 and Black resigned, having lost a piece Dxg4 leads to
19.Te8#. 1:0
1.24
Morozevich,A - Giri,A Biel (part one) 2012
Morozevich continued 33 f4? and finally lost (see also 3.89). Both
players underestimated Black's tactical weaknesses (f7 and the queen
on d6), and so missed a typical decoy: 33.Dh6+! Rg8 Not
33...Rf6?? 34.Df4+. 34.Dh8+! Rxh8 35.Cxf7+ Rg7 36.Cxd6, winning
a pawn and certainly the game. 1:0
1.25
Krasenkow,M - Bacrot,E Wijk aan Zee 2008
30...Ce2+ 31.Rh1 Tb1! There is a similar deflection in 1.4) 32.h3 If
32.Txb1 Cxf2# 32...Cxf2+ 33.Rh2 Txf1 34.Axf1 Cc3 and White
resigned.
1.26
Glek,I - Krasenkow,M Moscow 1982
34.Td7! De5 35.Txg7+! Black resigned in view of 35.Txg7+ Dxg7
36.Cf6+ Rh8 37.Dc8+ Df8 38.Dxf8#.
1.27
Krasenkow,M - Kharlov,A USSR Championship, Moscow 1991
Black's main tactical weakness is his knight on b8: 11.dxe6! White
meets the attack on his knight with a powerful counterblow. He now
wins heavy material. De7 Instead, 11...bxc3 12.exf7+ Re7
13.fxg8C+! is a nice underpromotion borrowed from the famous variation
of the Albin Countergambit; (although in this case it is not
obligatory since 13.fxg8D Dxd1+ 14.Rxd1 Txg8 15.Axb8 also
wins.); Likewise 11...fxe6 12.Dxd8+ Rxd8 13.Axb8 bxc3 14.bxc3 is
winning for White. 12.Ca4 12.Da4 was equally good.; After 12.Ca4,
Black loses his ill-fated knight on b8: for example, Ca6 (if 12...Da7
13.Axb8 Dxb8 14.Dd7# ) 13.Axc4 fxe6 14.Axa6. Therefore he re-
signed. This has been my quickest win against grandmaster opposition
so far. 1:0
1.28
Krasenkow,M - Shabodash,B Dnepropetrovsk 1985
After 14.Cde4! A spectacular move, exploiting the pin on Black's dpawn,
and again a typical blow - this time for the Open Spanish;
after the deflection or exchange of the f6-knight the d-pawn will be
lost) Axe4 If 14...Rh8 15.Cxf6 Axf6 16.Axd5 Axg5 17.Axc6.
15.Cxe4 Rh8 16.Cxf6 Txf6 17.Dxd5 Dxd5 18.Axd5, White went
on to convert his material advantage.
1.29
Krasenkow,M - Vovk,A Vlissingen 2009
32.Ce6! 32.Dxe5+ leads nowhere after Ag7; the text move clears
the seventh rank, which decides the game ] 32...Dxc4 Desperation;
In view of 32...Axe6 33.Dxe5+ Rg8 34.Axe6+; and 32...Dxb7
33.Dxe5+ Rg8 34.Cxd8+. 33.Dxe5+ Even better than 33.Dxc4
Axe6. 33...Rg8 34.Cxd8 Txd8 35.De7 Dc8 36.Tbxd7 Txd7
37.Dxd7 Dxd7 38.Txd7 fxe4 39.Te7 and White won quickly. 1:0
1.30
Krasenkow,M - Tukmakov,V Ostend 1990
Black's f5-knight is trembling like an autumn leaf. Therefore it is easy
to find the following tactical blow: 26.Txg7! This clearance of the
h3-c8 diagonal is quite spectacular. Black resigned in view of
26.Txg7 Axg7 (or 26...Rxg7 ) 27.Axf5. 1:0
1.31
Krasenkow,M - Macieja,B Polish Championship, Warsaw 2004
14.c5! A nice discovered attack followed by an intermediate move
prompted by Black's unprotected a6-bishop. Axf1 14...dxe5?
15.Da4+ wins. 15.cxd6! Dd7 16.Rxf1 with an extra pawn and a
winning position.
1.32
Krasenkow,M - Babu,S Calcutta 1995
17.Ag7! A typical clearance of the h-file. 17.Txf6!? exf6 18.Ce4 was
far less effective: Dxg2+! 19.Rxg2 Cd4! 20.Dxf6 Cf5! with an excellent
position. 17...Dh5 The only defence from the deadly check on
the h-file. As shown by 17...Axg7? 18.Dh7+ Rf8 19.Txf7#. 18.Dxh5
gxh5 19.Axf6 exf6 20.Txf6 Black is lost because White wins the
crucial f7-pawn. The game lasted only two moves: Te5? 21.Cxf7
Te2 22.Cd6 and Black resigned. 1:0
1.33
Krasenkow,M - Sokolov,I Cesme 2004
Black's pieces are extremely formidable, but the weakness of his
back rank allows White to defuse the situation: 26.Axa5! Instead, I
played 26.Ac3? and, after f6, quickly lost the c5-pawn and the game.
26...Txa5 27.Axe4 Axe4 28.Dxe4!, although his position is still
worse after Txc5 29.Dd4 c3.
1.34
Krasenkow,M - Fier,A Barcelona 2009
Black is suffering a lot, but he could have relieved the pressure:
17...Cxe4! Clearing the f6-square will be followed by a double attack.
Instead, my opponent didn't pay attention to White's unprotected
rooks and continued 17...De7?, although he finally saved this
decisive game in the Sants Open thanks to White's enormous help.
18.fxe4 Df6 19.e5 Dxg7 and White's compensation for the exchange
is under doubt.
1.35
Jakovenko,D - Ponomariov,R Astrakhan 2010
Tactical weaknesses on the b-file attract White's attention: 22.Axb5!
Dxb5 23.Tb1 Dc6 24.Db3+ c4 25.Dxb7 and White won. 1:0
1.36
Hou Yifan - Krasenkow,M Wijk aan Zee 2007
White played 22 Rb8+?, missing the motif of a double attack:
22.Axf4 Txf4 23.Cd5! cxd5 24.Axd5+ Rh8 25.Axa8 and wins. 1:0
1.37
Wang Hao - Carlsen,Ma Biel 2012
46...Cb6! A spectacular deflection. 47.Rf2 Alas, 47.Cxb6? is impossible
due to a3, when the pawn queens, which means that Black
now blockades White's passed pawn and keeps his own strong extra
pawn. 47...Cfd7 48.Re3 Rf8 49.f4 f5 50.exf5 exf5 51.Rd3 Re7
and Black won. 0:1
1.38
Krasenkow,M - Notkin,M Moscow 1980
22.Te3! Tg8 The only defence to 23 Rh3, but now a destructive queen
sacrifice occurs. 23.Dxh7+! Rxh7 24.Th3+ Black resigned in
view of 24.Th3+ Rg7 25.Ah6+ Rh7 26.Af8#. 1:0
1.39
Krasenkow,M - Kimelfeld,R Moscow 1988
53.Ac2! Clearing the h-file and preventing 53...Qxd2 for one decisive
moment. Ae2 Desperation. 53...Txc2 loses to 54.Dg5!, which
now threatens 55 Rh8+ - the main idea behind 53. Bc2 - and if Re8
55.Dxg7; instead, in the case of 53...Re8, White can mount his decisive
attack in various ways: for example, 54.Df4 (or 54.Dg5 Af8
55.Th8 Rd7 56.T1h7 ) 54...Txc2 55.Th8+ Re7 56.Dg5+ Rd7
57.Dxg7 ] 54.Dg5! Af3+ 55.Cxf3 gxf3+ 56.Rxf3 T8b3+ 57.Rg4
and Black resigned. 1:0
1.40
Sharipov,S - Krasenkow,M Samarkand 1979
How to exploit White's pinned bishop on c4? It is not difficult to find
38...e3!, clearing the fourth rank and threatening 39...Qh4. Black
obtains a strong attack. 39.Dc2? White collapses. In the case of
39.fxe3 Dh4 40.g3 De4!, Black wins the c4-bishop and obtains fair
winning chances; But not immediately 40...Dxc4? 41.Td8+ Rg7
42.Td7+! Rg6 43.Txc7 Dxc7 44.Dxc7 Axc7 45.Rf2, followed by
Kf3-e4 with a draw; 39.g3 is probably even worse, since Black maintains
strong pressure after f4! 40.fxe3 fxg3 41.hxg3 Dg5. You
needn't calculate all these variations when playing 38...e3, since it is
the only way to pose problems for White. It is up to him to solve
them. 39...Dh4! 40.Dxf5 Axh2+ 41.Rh1 Ad6+ 42.Dh3 Alternatively,
42.Rg1 e2! 43.Axe2 Dh2+ 44.Rf1 Dh1#. 42...Txc4 43.fxe3 Df2
and White resigned. 0:1
1.41
Gasanov,E - Grachev,B Moscow 2010
29...Cxg4 Instead, Black played 29...Df7? and the game finally ended
in a draw. 30.Txe8+ Rf7!. Chess is not draughts, so capturing
is not obligatory. Due to his mating threats, Black captures the e8-
rook on the next move and ends up with an extra piece: for example,
31.Db7+ Rxe8 32.Te1+ Rf8 33.De7+ Rg8.
1.42
Krasenkow,M - Astrom,G Stockholm 1989
26.Cg6+! hxg6 27.fxg6 Dg7 28.Ae6 and Black resigned, since his
collapse along the h-file is inevitable. 1:0
1.43
Tomashevsky,E - Grischuk,A Moscow 2012
27.Ce4 is the right move, with mutual chances. Instead, Tomashevsky
played 27.Ce6? and after Axe6 28.dxe6 Black's d-pawn unexpectedly
moved forward: d5!. Since 29.Dxd5? Td8 costs White a
piece, Black's central pawns suddenly became extremely dangerous
and White was very lucky to eventually save this poor position.
1.44
Krasenkow,M - Mueller,M Erfurt 1999
With the opponent's king in the centre, even unexpected ideas can
occur: 32.Axd4!! Te7 The bishop can't be taken: 32...Cxd4
33.Te5#; or 32...Rxd4 33.Td2+. 33.Txe7 Cxe7 34.Af6 and Black
resigned. 1:0
1.45
Krasenkow,M - Georgiev,V Cappelle la Grande 1992
I played 25.Tg6?!, after which Black could have resisted by means
of 25...Raf8. Instead, 25.Tf7+!! (a decoying check from an unprotected
square is never easy to find) leads to immediate mate or huge
material gains: for example, Rxf7 (or 25...Rd8 26.Dxg8+ ) 26.Dg6+
Re7 27.Df6+ Re8 28.Ag6#.
1.46
Gorelov,S - Krasenkow,M Moscow 1988
After 35.f4+! Blockade of the f4-square, clearance of the f-file and a
decoy - a number of tactical motifs are combined in a single move.
Instead, 35.Cf3+ obtains nothing after Rf4. 35...Rxf4 If 35...exf4
36.Cf3#; 35...Rh4 is equally hopeless: for example, 36.Cf3+ Rg3
37.Cxe5+ Rxf4 38.Cf7, etc. 36.Tf1+ Rg5 37.Cf3+ Rf4 38.Cd4+
The simplest. 38.g5!? Thh8 39.gxf6 is more sophisticated. 8...Rg5
39.Ce6+ Rh4 40.Txf6 [ 40.Cxd8 Axd8 41.Tc8 Ae7 42.Tf3 was go-
od enough too] 40...Td6 41.g5 Th5 42.Txg6 Ad8 43.Tf3 Txg5
44.Txg5 , Black lost on time. 1:0
1.47
Krasenkow,M - Ehlvest,J Polanica Zdroj 1997
Black took the wrong decision. After 32...Axe5 33.Txf7, he had the
brilliant reply Ag4+!!, either deflecting White's queen from the defence
of the rook or decoying White's king into hell: 34.Rxg4 Dxg2+
35.Rf5 Dxf2+ 36.Re6 Dxf7+ 37.Dxf7 Txf7 38.Rxf7 Axc3 and
wins. Instead, Black eventually lost the game.
1.48
Krasenkow,M - Abbasov,F Barlinek 2001
37.Cxd6! The weakness of the seventh rank is detected; it should
be cleared at any cost! Dxf2 Desperation. After 37...cxd6 38.Da7
Black is mated: for example, Rg8 39.Dh7+ Rf8 40.Ag6 Df6 41.Tb7,
etc. 38.Cxc8 Dxc2 39.Cd6! To the same square once again! Black
resigned, in view of 39.Cd6 cxd6 40.Dd8+ Rg7 41.Tb7+ Rh6 (or
41...Rg6 42.Dg8+ Rf5 43.Dh7+) 42.Df8+ Rg5 43.De7+ Rf5
44.Dh7+. 1:0
1.49
Krasenkow,M - Klovans,J Tashkent 1987
The g6-pawn decides the game after a nice queen sacrifice:
56.Dh3! Cf8 57.Dh7+! Cxh7 58.gxh7+ and Black resigned. 1:0
1.50
Morozevich,A - Krasenkow,M Cappelle la Grande 1992
21...Tfe8? was a mistake. The future super-GM replied. 21...Dg4;
or 21...Tde8 was necessary. 22.Dxf6 Dg4 23.Txe4! A double deflection,
and it turned out that the rook was untouchable as Black's
major pieces were overloaded. After Dg6 24.Txe8+ Txe8
25.Dxg6+ fxg6 26.Rf2 only the insufficient technical skills of the 15-
year-old Morozevich allowed me to save the endgame.
1.51
Krasenkow,M - Tomczak,R Polish Ch-ship, Warsaw 2002
31...Cxf3? is a huge mistake due to a rare underpromotion without
check: 32.d8C! with an extra piece. White can also play 32.Aa6,
and if Dc6, then (or Da8 33.d8D Txd8 34.Txd8+ Dxd8 35.Dxf3)
33.d8C! wins; not 32.d8D? Cd4+. 1:0
1.52
Kempinski,R - Krasenkow,M Katowice 2012
By placing his rook on the unprotected a3-square, White hardly thought
that it could be an important factor. However, after 27...Ae7!
28.Cxb6 Rc7! , the ambush was followed by a sudden discovered
attack. After 29.Cxd5+ Axd5, Black has no formal material advantage,
but his bishop pair should decide the game (in fact, Black won
after a lot of mutual errors).
1.53
Peng Zhaoqin - Krasenkow,M Wijk aan Zee 2002
White's pieces are overloaded: 37...b2! A double deflection once
again. 38.Da2 Alternatively, 38.Dxb2 Txa7; or 38.Axb2 Db8+.
38...b1D 39.Dxd5+ De6 and White resigned. 0:1
1.54
Gdanski,J - Krasenkow,M Koszalin 1998
White's only chance is an unexpected stalemate idea. 55.Da7+!!
The other attempts are absolutely in vain: 55.Cf5+? Dxf5 56.h6+
Rf7 57.Da7+ Re8 ;or 55.Dd8? De1+ 56.Rh3 De3+ 57.Rh4 Dg5+
58.Rg3 Rxh6 59.Df8+ Dg7 60.g5+! fxg5 61.Dd6+ Rxh5 62.Dd1+
Rg6 63.Dd3+ Rf6 64.Dxc4 De7 and Black wins. 55...Rf8
55...Rxh6?? 56.De3+!! Dxe3 is stalemate. 56.Db8+? White has
obtained a new life, but fails to exploit it. 56.Dxh7 was possible, tenaciously
defending: for example, Tc2 57.Dh8+ Re7 58.Cf5+ Rd7
59.Dg7+ Rc8 60.Rh3 De5 61.Cg3.; However, the best option was
the hard-to-find 56.Rh3!!, preparing the eventual return of the knight
to f5. It is now difficult for Black to make progress. Of course, your
task was just to find 55 Qa7+, so don't worry if you didn't discover
these further niceties. 56...Re7 Black's king now escapes the
checks. 57.Db7+ Re8 58.Db8+ Dc8 59.Da7 Dc6 60.Df7+ Rd8
61.Cf5? Dh1+ 62.Rg3 Dg1+ 63.Rh3 Dxg4+. White resigned. 0:1
1.55
Cheparinov,I - Sjugirov,S European Championship, Plovdiv 2012
41.Rf2? The wrong square, as Black now uses an unexpected
geometric motif, wins the f4-pawn, and obtains winning chances.
41.Rf3!, protecting the pawn, was the correct continuation.
41...Ta1! 42.Ae7 Ta4! 43.Ae2 Txf4+ 44.Af3 Ta4. Of course, White
can put up resistance here, but the Bulgarian Grandmaster, taken
aback, eventually failed to hold his ground.
1.56
Ivanov,S - Greenfeld,A Bugojno 1999
19...Bc8?! is too passive. Fortunately, Black has an excellent alternative:
19...Ac5! 20.Txd8 20.fxe6 Txd4! 21.cxd4 Ab4 reveals the
point behind 19...Bc5 ;also bad is 20.Ab2 Txd4! 21.cxd4 Ab4
22.Ac3 Axc3 23.Dxc3 Db1+ 24.Ad1 Dxe4+ ;or 20.Td3 Ac4
20...Txd8 By seizing the d-file, Black obtains a strong attack against
White's uncastled king. 21.Db2 To avoid being mated, White liqui-
dates to an endgame, which, however, is equally poor. That said,
21.Dc2 Ag1 ;and 21.Dg5 Axa2 were scarcely better alternatives.
21...Af2+ 22.Rf1 gxf5 23.Dxb6 Axb6 24.Ag5 Tc8 25.exf5 Axf5
26.Ad2 Ae6. With two weak pawns and his rook out of play, White
has no chances to survive. Black won in just more ten moves. 0:1
1.57
Yakovich,Y - Smikovski,I Russian Championship, Samara 2000
30.Ae7? White commits a typical mistake in an attempt to obtain a
non-existing advantage. He should have played 30.Axf4; or 30.Ac5.
30...Dxd4! Queen sacrifices are often missed, even by grandmasters.
Yuri Yakovich probably expected 30...Txd4? 31.Axf6+ Ag7
32.Axg7+ Rxg7 33.Dxd4+ Dxd4 34.Cxd4. 31.Axd8?? Losing a
piece, but even after 31.Cxd4 Txe7, it is very difficult to escape the
pin and save material; amazingly, though, White can solve his problems
by means of 32.Rh1!!: for example, Te4 (or 32...Ce2 33.Te1!
Txd4 34.Dxd4 Cxd4 35.Txe7 and White's rook is not worse than
Black's minor pieces) 33.Dc1!! Tdxd4 34.g3 Tc4 35.Dd2 Ted4
36.De3 and White is okay. 31...Dxd8. White resigned. 0:1
1.58
Anastasian,A - Krasenkow,M Moscow 1989
As was mentioned in the Introduction, some of the most difficult moves
in chess are those which place your own pieces under attack by
enemy pawns. Once this psychological barrier has been overcome,
a lot of brilliant tactical possibilities become available. Here after
42.Ab5!!, The bishop is untouchable. (Black can't stop White's apawn),
and so White wins the a6-pawn and subsequently the game.
Instead, 42.b5? Ac4+ 43.Rd2 Rd6 44.b6 merely leads to a draw.
1:0
1.59
Krasenkow,M - Abdulla,AR Mumbai 2008
To 20.Cxb5?!, Black replied with an amazing capture of a tripleprotected
pawn: Instead, White had a good possibility in 20.b4 Cd4 (if
20...Ab6 21.Cxb5 and Axf2+ doesn't work due to 22.Rxf2) 21.Dg2
Ab6 22.e3 with favourable complications. 20...Axf2+!! Double deflection
and a decoy, regaining the material. As a result, he traded
his weak b5-pawn for White's important f2-pawn. After 21.Dxf2
21.Rxf2?! Dc5+ 22.e3 Dxb5 is even worse for White. 21...Dxb7
22.Cxa7 Dxb2? Correct was 22...Txd1 23.Txd1 Dxb2 24.Dc5
Dxa3!, and it is Black who wins a pawn. 23.Txd8 Txd8 24.Cc6,
Black was still fine, but then he lost his way and the game.
1.60
Pirisi,G - Krasenkow,M Balatonbereny 1988
36...Ta2?? was a grave error: Black should have played 36...De2
with a clear advantage. 37.Tb8+ Rf7 38.Tf8+!!, and Black had to
resign himself to a draw; Due to the perpetual: 38.Tf8+ Rg7 (Rxf8
39.Dd8+ Rf7 40.Df6+ Re8 41.Dh8+) 39.Tg8+! Rh7 40.Th8+!, etc.
A similar accident happened in V.Smyslov-M.Tal Zagreb 1959.
1.61
Urban,K - Krasenkow,M Polish Championship, Warsaw 2001
35.Td7?? falls directly into a beautiful trap: Instead, White should
have played 35.Td8 . In that case the pinned rook could not deliver
mate, and the queen sacrifice only leads to perpetual check.
35...exf2+ 36.Txf2 Dxh2+!! There was also a second solution in
36...Dg2+!!. 37.Rxh2 Or 37.Txh2 Tf1+ 38.Rg2 T8f2#. 37...Txf2+
38.Rg1 Tf1+ 39.Rg2 T8f2#.
1.62
Krasenkow,M - Tregubov,P Nancy 2009
26...Ac3!! A clearance of the e5-square by placing the bishop under
the attack of the opponent's pawn, but as I said above, such moves
are always difficult to find. Instead, 26...Axb2?? 27.Txb2 Ce5 didn't
work due to 28.Df1; and 26...Ad4? was actually played in the game,
where White parried all the threats with 27.f4 and eventually won.
27.bxc3 Otherwise White loses an Exchange. Ce5 and wins. After
27...Ce5, White's queen can't retreat in view of 28...Nf3 or, in the
case of 28.De3, then Cg4. 0:1
1.63
Krasenkow,M - Koneru,H Mumbai 2008
After 39.h6+ Rg6 40.Ac1!!, Black's rook is suddenly trapped. If
40.Ac1 Tb1 , then (or 40...Tc2 ) 41.Ae4+. In the game White failed
to find 40 Bc1, played 40.Ae4+, and the fight continued after f5.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai