I, the undersigned,
JACK BLOOM
(_________________ )
AD DEPONENT
1.
1.1 I am an adult male member of the above details and of full legal capacity, employed
as a member of the Gauteng Provincial Legislature, City Hall Street, Johannesburg and
residing at _______________________
1.2 Unless otherwise indicated, the facts contained in this affidavit are within my
personal knowledge, and are to the best of my belief both true and correct.
AD PURPOSE
2.
2.1This affidavit concerns possible criminal offences committed by the Gauteng
MEC for Health, Ms Qedani Mahlangu (hereafter referred to as the MEC) in terms
of the Mental Health Care Act, Act 17 of 2002 (hereafter referred to as
the MHCA), the National Health Act, Act 61 of 2003 (hereafter referred to as the
NHA) and in terms of the common law.
3.
3.2 The Report was published pursuant to an investigation into the reported deaths
of mentally ill patients in the Gauteng Province upon request by the Minister of
Health.
3.3.2 The decision by the GDoH to terminate its contract with the LEHCC was done
at the instruction of, alternatively with authorization from, alternatively under the
supervision of, the MEC who was at that time ultimately responsible for the GDoHs
operations.
3.3.5On 13 September 2016, the MEC announced that the number of mortalities
following on from the decision of the GDoH to terminate its contract with the LEHCC
was 36. A copy of this statement is attached hereto marked Annexure JB2
3.3.6 At the time of the above statement, the number of mortalities was in fact 77.
b) That the decision to transfer precipitously and chaotically without a proper plan and
against the advice of expert and professional practitioners was negligent, reckless and in
violation of the Constitution, the NHA and the MHCA.
4.
(c) neglects, abuses or treats a mental health care user in any degrading
manner or allows the user to be treated in that manner;
(ii) not to comply with any care, treatment and rehabilitation plan or
terms of a leave of absence or conditional discharge; or
(2) Any person who is found guilty of an offence under this Act is liable on
conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months or to
both such fine and such imprisonment.
4.3Further, the decision by the GDoH to terminate its contract with the LEHCC at
the instruction of, alternatively with authorization from, alternatively under the
supervision of, the MEC directly resulted in the neglect and abuse of numerous
mental health care users, the full extent of which is yet to be realized. Instigating
such treatment, let alone permitting it, is therefore a prima facie offence in terms
of Section 70(1)(c) above, and accordingly I submit that the MEC is guilty of such
an offence.
5.
(2) The national department, every provincial department and every municipality
must establish such health services as are required in terms of this Act, and all
health establishments and health care providers in the public sector must equitably
provide health services within the limits of available services.
5.2 The decision by the GDoH to terminate its contract with the LEHCC at the
instruction of, alternatively with authorization from, alternatively under the
supervision of, the MEC amounted to the prima facie withholding of adequate health
services as required by the above Section 3(2), and accordingly I submit that the
MEC is guilty of such an offence.
10.(1) A health care provider must provide a user with a discharge report at the
time of the discharge of the user from a health establishment containing such
information as may be prescribed.
6.
6.1 The crime of culpable homicide is defined in S v Whitehead 2008 (1) SACR 431
(SCA) at Para 37 as the unlawful, negligent killing of another human being.
6.2 The Report in numerous instances describes the conduct of the GDoH, and by
extension the MEC, as negligent. There can be no doubt that the deaths of the
patients are as a direct consequence of that conduct, and that the conduct was not
in accordance with the NHA, the MHCA and the Constitution. It is therefore
apparent that the MEC, in instructing, alternatively authorizing, alternatively
supervising the termination of the GDoH contract with the LEHCC has prima
facia met the requirements of culpable homicide, and I accordingly submit that the
MEC is guilty of such an offence.
7.
I herewith request that the matter be investigated fully, and the appropriate steps
whatsoever they may be - taken to see justice done and the rule of law upheld.
8.
_____________________
__________________________
COMMISSIONER OF OATHS
FULL NAMES:________________________________________________
DESIGNATION:________________________________________________
AREA:________________________________________________
ADDRESS:________________________________________________