Republic v. Bantigue Point Development, G.R.

No. 162322, March 14, 2012 (Supra.)

RULE 15- MOTIONS
Tijam v. Sibonghanoy, L-21450, April 15, 1968
(Supra.)
Sec. 1. Motion defined
Improper Venue
Sec. 2. Motions must be in writing
See: Rule 4
Sec. 3. Contents
Sec. 4, A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC, March 4,
2003
Sec. 4. Hearing of motion
Universal Robina v. Lim, G.R. No. 154338,
Anama v. Phil. Savings Bank, G.R. No. 187021,
October 5, 2007
January 25, 2012 (Supra.)
No legal capacity to sue
Sec. 5. Notice of hearing
Evangelista v. Santiago, G.R. No. 157447, April
Anama v. Phil. Savings Bank, G.R. No. 187021,
29, 2005
January 25, 2012 (Supra.)
B. Van Zuiden v. GTVL Manufacturing, G.R. No.
Tan v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 130314, September
147905, May 28, 2007
22, 1998 (Supra.)
Litis Pendentia
Sec. 6. Proof of service necessary
Spouses Marasigan v. Chevron, G.R. No. 184015,
Sec. 7. Motion day
February 8, 2012 (Supra.)
Quito v. Stop & Save Corp., G.R. No. 186657,
Sec. 8. Omnibus motion
June 11, 2014 (Supra.)
Benavidez v. Salvador, G.R. No. 173331,
Tung Ho Steel v. Ting Guan, G.R. No. 182153, April 7,
December 11, 2013 (Supra.)
2014 (Supra.)
Res Judicata
Sec. 9. Motion for leave
Heirs of Sotto v. Palicte, G.R. No. 159691, June
Sec. 10. Form
13, 2013 (Supra.)
Spouses Antonio v. Sayman, G.R. No. 149624,
RULE 16- MOTION TO DISMISS September 29, 2010 (Supra.)

Sec. 1. Grounds. Prescription/Statute of Limitations

See: Sec. 1, Rule 9 Marquez v. Baldoz, G.R. No. 143779, April 4,

2003
Obando v. Figueras, G.R. No. 134854, January 18,
2000 States no cause of action

No jurisdiction over defendant
See: Sec. 20, Rule 14
Planters Development Bank v. Chandumal, G.R.
No. 195619, September 5, 2012 (Supra.)
Carandang v. Heirs of de Guzman, G.R. No.
160347, November 29, 2006 (Supra.)
Lucas v. Lucas, G.R. No. 190710, June 6, 2011
(Supra.)
Lazaro v. Brewmaster, G.R. No. 182779, August
23, 2010
NM Rothschild v. Lepanto, G.R. No. 175799,
November 28, 2011 (Supra.)
Evangelista v. Santiago, G.R. No. 157447, April
29, 2005 (Supra.)

No jurisdiction over the subject matter Paid, Waived, Abandoned, Extinguished

Allied Domecq Phil. v. Hon. Villon, G.R. No. Star Two v. Ko, G.R. No. 185454, March 23, 2011
156264, September 30, 2004 (Supra.)
 Urethane v. Ong, G.R. No. 164632, October 29, Sec. 2. Dismissal upon motion of plaintiff
2008
Fernando v. Acuna, G.R. No. 161030, September Sec. 3. Dismissal due to fault of plaintiff
14, 2011
AFPRSBS v. Republic, G.R. No. 188956, March 20,
Unenforceable 2013
Phil. Charter v. Explorer Machine, G.R. No. 175409,
See: Art. 1403, Civil Code September 7, 2011
Republic v. Enriquez, G.R. No. 181458, March 20,
Failure to comply with condition precedent 2013
Shimizu Philippines v. Magasalin, G.R. No. 170026,
a) Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies June 2012
b) Earnest Efforts toward amicable settlement- Quintos v. Nicolas, G.R. No. 210252, June 16, 2014
Art. 151, Family Code
c) Certification of Non-Forum Shopping Sec. 4. Dismissal of counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-
d) Payment of Docket Fee party complainant
e) Demand to vacate/payment of rental- Sec.
2, Rule 70
RULE 18- PRE-TRIAL
f) Alternative Dispute Resolution
g) Referral to Katarungang Pambarangay
Sec. 1. When conducted
Secs. 399-422, 15, Local Government
See: A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC
Code
SC Admin. Circular 1493
Sarmiento v. Juan, G.R. No. 56605, January 28, 1983
Eloisa Merchandising v. Banco de Oro, G.R. No.
Morata v. Go, 125 SCRA 444 (1983)
192716, June 13, 2012
Uy v. Contreras, 237 SCRA 167 (1994)
Espiritu v. Lazaro, G.R. No. 181020, November 25,
Wingarts v. Mejia, A.M. No. MTJ-94-1012
2009
March 20, 1995
Paranque Kings v. Santos, G.R. No. 194638, July 2,
Mendova v. Afable, A.M. No. MTJ-02-
2014
1402, 4 December 2002
Corpus v. Hon. Ochotorena, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1861, July
Aquino v. Aure, 546 SCRA 71 (2008)
30, 2004
Pang-et v. Manacnes-dao-as, G.R. No.
167261, March 2, 2007
Sec. 2. Nature and Purpose
Agbayani v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
183623, June 25, 2012
Suico Industrial Corp., v. Hon. Yap, G.R. No. 177711,
September 5, 2012
Sec. 2. Hearing of motion.
Sec. 3. Notice of pre-trial
Sec. 3. Resolution of the motion.
Sec. 4. Appearance of parties
Sec. 4. Time to plead.
Sec. 5. Effect of dismissal
Absolute Management v. Metrobank, G.R. No.
NM Rothschild v. Lepanto, G.R. No. 175799, 190277, July 23, 2014
November 28, 2011 (Supra.) Suico Industrial Corp., v. Hon. Yap, G.R. No. 177711,
September 5, 2012 (Supra.)
Sec. 6. Pleading grounds as affirmative defenses
Sec. 5. Effect of failure to appear
RULE 17- DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS
Chingkoe v. Republic, G.R. No. 183608, July 31, 2013
Durban Apartments v. Pioneer, G.R. No. 179419,
Sec. 1. Dismissal upon notice by plaintiff
January 12, 2011
Dael v. Spouses Beltran, G.R. No. 156470, April 30,
Sec. 6. Pre-trial brief
2008
Go v. Curz, G.R. No. L-58986, April 17, 1989
BPI v. Dando, G.R. No. 177456, September 4, 2009
 Benavidez v. Salvador, G.R. No. 173331, December
11, 2013
Sec. 7. Record of pre-trial
See: Rule 10, Sec. 5, Rules of Court
Rule 18, Sec. 7, Rules of Court
Lazo v. Republic Surety, G.R. No. L-27365, January
30, 1970 (Supra.)
Buce v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136913, May 12,
2000 (Supra.)
Mercader v. DBP, G.R. No. 130699, May 12, 2000
(Supra.)