EE042-3.5-3-PED
UC3F1605EEE/ME
WEIGHTAGE: 40%
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES:
6 Where the assignment should be submitted in both hardcopy and softcopy, the
softcopy of the written assignment and source code (where appropriate) should be
on a CD in an envelope / CD cover and attached to the hardcopy.
Individual Assignment
LO3: Evaluate and design the industrial application of power electronic devices. (PO3,
PO4, PO5, PO6, PO8)
PO3: Ability to recognize and apply suitable tools and techniques for engineering practical
applications.
PO4: Ability to investigate complex engineering problems using research techniques.
PO5: Ability to design innovative solutions for complex engineering problems.
PO6: Ability to communicate effectively and professionally.
PO8: Ability to practice safety, health, social, cultural and legal responsibilities as an engineer.
Question Vs Taxonomy
AGMT
Cognitive Level Psychomotor Level Affective Level
Task No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5
1 80 M 10 M 10 M
POM 80 % 10 % 10 %
1.0 Introduction
You are required to design a uk converter that has an input voltage of 12 V. The output is
regulated at 18 V to supply a 50 W load. The inductor current ripple must not exceed 10
percent of the average inductor current and the output voltage ripple must not exceed 1 percent
of the average output voltage. You are required to select the components to be used and to justify
their required ratings. Describe your design with analytical calculations and compare them with
simulation results.
An enhancement topology is also intended to improve the performance of the conventional
uk converter. Similarly, the design of the proposed converter is required to meet the design
specifications.
4.0 Report
In this assignment, you are required to prepare a technical report. The report should not be
more than 35 pages long, inclusive of diagrams, with 1 spacing in-between lines. The format
of the report is as follows:
(i) Introduction
(v) Innovation
(vi) Discussions
(vii) Conclusion
(viii) References
APPENDIX A
The report must be formatted with a font size of 12pt if Times New Roman or a font size of
11pt if Arial and 1.5 line spacing. Please ensure the paragraphs are properly aligned/
justified.
There should be List of Tables and List of Figures after the Table of Contents.
The report should be in chapters and the structure should not go beyond the second level.
Instead of adding subsections at the third level you may use bullets if required.
All information provided must be straight to the point, precise and all information must be
accordingly cited and well presented. Avoid plagiarism.
All figures and tables must have a title and be properly referenced i.e. indicate the source.
References
All references to books, papers, and other publications must be fully and correctly quoted to be
useful to the reader.
Citation Example
In the text
The analysis of the varactor diode multiplier has been extensively reviewed by Scanlan (1989)
and will.
APPENDIX B
0 1-2 3 4 5
Not done. Simple description of the Simple description of the Extensive description of the Extensive and detailed
converter converter converter description of the converter
Introduction Did not manage to identify Able to identify only one Able to identify the various Able to identify the various
any analysis used analysis used analysis used analysis used
(5%) Some details missing Able to state reasons for the
use of analysis
0 1-4 5-8 9 - 11 12 - 15
Not done. Simple description of the Simple description of the Extensive description of the Extensive and detailed
steps and results steps and results steps and results description of the steps and
LTSpice/PSpice/
Did not manage to identify Able to identify only one Able to identify the various results
Simulink simulation all the steps used step used steps used Able to identify the various
results (15%) Some details missing steps used
Able to state reasons for the
use of all the steps
0 12 3-5 6-8 9 - 10
Not done. Very little discussion on Discussion on Discussion on enhancement Substantial and detailed
enhancement topology enhancement topology is topology is well explained, discussion on enhancement
Innovation Many details are missing quite well explained, but but with some details topology
(10%) with some details missing missing Substantial description with
Some discussions with Some discussions with the design principles,
design principles design principles and analytical calculations and
analytical calculations simulations
0 1-5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20
Not done Simple description of the Simple description of the Extensive description of the Extensive and detailed
Discussions (20%) voltage rating, ripple and voltage rating, ripple and rating and ripple description of the rating
power consumption power consumption Able to identify the various and ripple
Did not manage to identify Able to identify only one ratings used Able to identify the various
any of the ratings and rating used Some details missing ratings used
calculation used Able to state reasons for the
use of proper ratings and
energy consumption
0 1-2 3 4 5
Not done Simple conclusion with the Average conclusion with Good conclusion with the Excellent conclusion with
work done the work done work done the work done
Conclusion
(5%)
0 12 3-5 6-8 9 - 10
Did not turn up Barely able to demonstrate Able to demonstrate and Able to demonstrate explain Able to demonstrate
for presentation and explain what was done explain briefly what was sufficiently what was done explain clearly and in detail
in the assignment. done in the assignment in the assignment. what was done in the
Presentation
Reading directly from Presentation shows signs Presentation contains assignment
(10%) slides or script. of organization, but there relevant information. Presentation is organized,
Presentation shows poor are parts that do not tie in. Large amount of preparation relevant, logical and
organization and poor Fair amount of preparation evident. interesting.
delivery. evident. Slides are well-designed Large amount of
Information presented is Constantly refers to notes Refers to notes occasionally
preparation evident.
mostly irrelevant to the Slides are well-designed
topic
Minimal audience
interaction
Delivery is relatively
Delivery of presentation is
smooth, with audience
No audience interaction interaction smooth, natural and
engaging, with audience
interaction
0 12 3-5 6-8 9 - 10
Very poor Barely able to explain Simple description Extensive description Extensive description
Q&A answering skills Did not manage to explain Able to explain clearly and Able to explain clearly and Able to explain clearly and
for all the
(10%) questions
clearly and in detail in detail in detail in detail
Some details missing Able to elaborate with
design equations,
calculations and references