3
CIM Lecture - Introductory Remarks
Konigsman (Noranda) - VP Engineering & Projects to Lynch
Konigsman, 1992; Foreward:
Text Book A Practical Guide to Process Control in the
Minerals Industry {by Flintoff and Mular}
The question one must ask is whether we are tapping the full
potential of this technology? The answer: ...... is No!
[MITEC Mineral Processing Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), whom acknowledged 2 problem areas:
1) small plant & 2) those plants who use some control but not achieving maximum benefit.]
Alban Lynch, (founder of the Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre in Brisbane, Australia), Oct. 2012:
Control is not a high priority here (Australia) even though the effect of
inadequate control on the loss of mineral tailings is obvious.
Manual Control, Process Automation or Operational
Performance Excellence? What is the difference?
higher production
units
setpoint
lower costs
better
poor control control best control
time
Poor to Optimized Control
1.Measure 2.Control
Best Practice:
Necessary for:
Operational
Performance
Excellence
3.Optimize
Effect of 115sump
on grinding (COFD & RMF)
limit
Must Correct
Plant
Processing
Problems
First!!
Process Control Objectives Summary
Manual Control usually acting on valve position (i.e. % opening, or motor drive speed)
PID Control process variable (PV) & setpoints (SP) in eng. units
i.e. automatic regulatory control based upon the PID control algorithm:
Feedback only (SISO . Single input, single output)
Feedforward and Feedback (MIMO, Multiple input, multiple output)
Ratio Control and Cascade Control
Split Range Control
Smith Predictor . dealing with significant time delay
MPC (Multivariable Predictive Control) or Model Based Control based on
true process dynamics, and using recent history & a model based trajectory
Rule or Fuzzy Control based on knowledge / experience
Automation Control of:
specific known actions or sequences; batch processes; etc.
Advanced (Optimizing) Process Control
Simplest of Controllers
we all know!
Note: No Measurement
Shown!
0 1600 0 0.035
9/29/2002 9:30:00 AM 12.00 Hour(s) 9/29/2002 9:30:00 PM
TONNAGE ALIM.BROYEUR AUTOG
PUISSANCE BROYEUR AUTOGENE
PRESS. D'HUILE PALIER DECH
Alimentation Moulin AG D75
How is Control Applied?
(in our industry)
Objective Function
Cash Optimization
Site
Economics
Plant Plant
Optimization
Optimization
Advanced
Process
Optimize
Optimizing Control
or Control
Impacts
Business
Profitability
($$)
18
Advanced Process Control (APC)
Hydro Management &
Site Peak Power Control
Results:
1. Lowest overall (c/kWh) Ontario Hydro Mining customer using TOU (time of
use) Hydro rates
2. Cumulative (5 year) total savings from 1989 to 1993 incl. = $17,600,000
1. 1989 = $2.0M saving on 1,089,851 MWh
2. 1990 = $2.4M
3. 1991 = $3.5M
4. 1992 = $5.6M
5. 1993 = $4.1M saving on 1,076,755 MWh
Conclusions:
1. There are MANY more OPPORTUNITIES throughout
the Metallurgical processes for supervisory control
Diagnostics . are
you using them?
5 Essential Control Loop Elements (D. Harrold)
& Consider the Whole Loop (Forsman ABB)
Five Essential*
Control Loop Elements: Consider the whole loop
PC-program in 3
1. Sensing element Advant OCS
2. Transmitter Ramp rate Filter
3. Controller
Deadband
4. Final Control Element D/A
(e.g. Actuator or VSD) 4-20 mA A/D
4-20 mA
I/P
5. Process 3-15 psi
Filter
mV
Positioner Filter
0-6 bar
14%
Frequency (% )
12%
50 14 t/h 8%
6%
4%
Reduction: 72% 2%
0%
30
0
0
5
15
45
60
75
90
-9
-7
-6
-4
-3
-1
0
-1
20.0%
Benefits rougher feed density 18.0%
STD=0.007
STD=0.017
16.0%
14.0%
Standard Dev:
Frequency
12.0%
BEFORE
10.0% 58% reduction of
0.0170.007 kg/l 8.0%
standard deviation AFTER
6.0%
4.0%
0.0%
03
3
01
02
04
05
0
5
1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
Bins - Primary Rougher Feed Density Set-Point Deviation
Eland Mill (2010) Overall Recovery Improvement from:
Primary Grind & Primary Rougher Recovery Improvements
55 On a feed grade of
1) Prim. Grind Improvement: 2.54 g/t PGE:
50
Before:
45
42% -75microns Before Sec. rougher
40 After tails dropped
After: 0.24 g/t;
35
52% -75microns
30 Before After Overall plant
2) Primary Rougher rec. increased
Recovery Improvement: 75 3%;
70
Before: 65
60% 60 Final
55 Before concentrate
After: 50 After grade increased
45
73% 40 by 10 g/t.
35
30
Before After
Control Loop Improvement
(Flotation level controller)
regulatory control, bias removal
20.0%
Reduction of variability
Frequency
15.0%
BEFORE
Elimination of bias STD DEV: 6.0%
AFTER
10.0%
virtual absence of Integral
action
5.0%
Smoother control action
KPIs (key performance 0.0%
------------------------------
In terms of automation functionality, regulatory control & APC serve much different purposes.
The primary role of regulatory control is to ensure stable, safe, and reliable
operations while maintaining process units at a desired or specified condition.
It does not attempt to continuously improve operations in an economically optimal manner.
APC, on the other hand, is a supervisory control application that coordinates a large
number of parameters to maintain control closer to operating constraints and more
favorable economic operating conditions.
E.g.
Roaster Control Layered, MPC (Model Based Control, with optimization logic), on
top of well tuned PID mass feed controllers.
Results:
1. 77% reduction in bed temperature Stnd. Dev allowing temperature and
throughput optimization, closer to Roaster constraints.
2. Overall throughput increase over extended periods of 4%.
DeltaV (Emerson) Systematic Approach
Advanced Control
Fuzzy Logic
Neural
MPC (Model Predictive Control)
Predict / PredictPro
The Collahuasi Solution:
MPC ProfitSAG replaces Expert Systems (Rules)
(CMP 2010 Presentation from Ivn Yutronic (CMDIC),
Rodrigo Toro (Honeywell); see also automining2012
CVs (Controlled)
MVs (Manipulated) Mills Weight
Fresh Feed Mills Power
Mill Speed SAG Mills Noise
1011
Solids Mills Torque
Produced Pebbles
Process
DVs (Disturbance) Value Predictions
Returned pebble
Particle size
Implemented Multivariable Predictive Control
Approx 230 known MPC applications . all vendors
of these installations 70% Honeywell {B. Jonas}
CrushingT
SAG/AG Mills
Ball/Rod MillsT Cu, Ni, Zi,
FlotationT Ur, Au
CCD /Thickeners
Roaster
Induration
EAF
Converter
Acid Plant
SXT
Alum. Autoclaves
FiltrationT
EvaporationT
Heat InterchangeT Alumina
Precipitation
Calciner
T=Train Kiln
Other
Tools: People:
Instruments; Control / Process
Systems etc. rP ocess Knowledge
Control ->
Operational
Performance
Excellence
Actions:
Support
Successes:
Management; Results &
Technology Transfer Examples
Process Instrumentation
Process
Flow Valve positioner protection
Industrial
Continuous Gas Analyzer In Situ Gas Analyzer Proximity RFID Network Industrial
Switches Systems Switches WLAN
pH best
practices
Example ?
Memosens/ Liquiline
Digital pH Systems Maximize process up- time
E+H Canada
Slide 1
Dirty connections
are irrelevent!!
E+H Canada
Slide 16
Multivariable
DP
Vortex
SONAR Ultrasonic Hydrocylone feed line
as used by Collahuasi, Chile
Xstrata Cu - Standard
Concentrator (5):
Antapaccay, Las Bambas,
Coriolis (Peru) selected SONARtrac
Magmeter
for the principal slurry lines
Flow Measurement - In Circuit SONAR
Ref: Christian OKeefe, cokeefe@cidra.com
Felix, Peacock, Huysamen, Thwaites
Platinum 2012: The Impact of Entrained Air and Enhanced Flow Measurements at the Eland Concentrator
CSQA:
Cathode Surface
Quality Analyzer
(Aplik)
Manual Control, Process Automation or Operational
Performance Excellence? What is the difference?
8. Best Practices
Control to Metallurgy ($$) 2. Level Control
1. Basic Level Device Tuning (PID
Flotation
Level Control Feedback)
7. Level Setpoint
Optimization 3. Split Range
(e.g. Froth Actuation
Velocity (2 Dart Valves)
Controller)
Emerson Smart
Positioners
4. Smart
6. Surge Tank Positioner
Control (Valve
Tuning 5. Level Control Tuning opening
(+ Feedforward) Feedback)
Flotation Control: Points on Control
Structure and importance of layering (Gilles)
Ratio Control
Measurement:
Tonnage or
Tonnage*Head Grade Set Point:
cc/min
Flow Control
3. Flow Control
7. Met. Control
with feedback tuning (eng.
Optimization Units)
(Mass Pull;
Analyzer
recovery or
froth quality) 4. Ratio Control
g/Tonne
6. Met. Control
with strategies for 5. Met. Control
start-up, shutdown, (Ratio) GMU
& short stoppages,
g/Metal Unit
or losses in XRF
data Robust Reagent Control
(Feedforward only)
Manual Control, Process Automation or Operational
Performance Excellence? What is the difference?
Process Control
tim ge 3
n
tio
Process constraint
iza
Sta
higher production
units
Stabilization
setpoint
Stage 1
lower costs
Op
Flotation Control
better Stabilization
poor control control best control
to
time Optimization
7
Su
sta
ine
d Va
Sta Re riabi
ge du lity
cti
2 on
Control Performance Monitor (CPM)
{Matrikon/Honeywell} is
a control performance improvement product that
can diagnose causes of poor control at all levels of
the plant control hierarchy:
CPM can enable a sustainable workflow that enables tracking of maintenance efforts as well as
archiving maintenance history on each loop.
1st CPM Controller X Nis Strathcona Mill
also utilized at Raglan &
Eland Platinum Mills
Motivation:
Continuous monitoring, prioritization of process variability for Sustained Variability Reduction
Continuous monitoring of controller service factors ( i.e. Manual or Auto, how the controller
performs, etc. )
Indication of the root cause of deteriorating controller performance
View all area controls
Report results for:
Managers
Supervisors
Technical staff
CPM trial at Strathcona Mill
Example Case:
Persistent Strong Oscillation
Requires
CPM
Daily
Attention
Champion Assess
Problem
PV
Weekly
Daily Time
CPM provides
assessment, notification Resolved Disposition
PV User needs to take action,
Workflow
fix the problem
Move loops with known
Time
issue to another WO
disposition category Pending
Dont be nagged on the
same problem again
Manual
35
Soft Sensors
30
FeO
25
20
Classification for
15
10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Quality Control
Sample No.
Control System
Early Warning Process
40
Integration
Condition Monitors
35
30
SPE
Confidence Limit
25
SPE
20
15
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time
Kairos Mining (Chile) A Comprehensive
Approach to Sustained Benefits in Automation
CMP 2010 PAPER #27 by
Giselle Schifferli
DATACENTER
TRAINING CENTER
TESTING LABORATORY
Honeywell Remote Support Centre
Kairos Mining, Santiago, Chile
Collahuasi
Xstrata Cu,
Original Focus: Codelco Casarones
AngloAmerican
-Chuquicamata
Automation deployment &
-El Teniente
support -Andina
Multiple sites supported from -Salvador
Santiago -Ministro Hales
Expanded for Asset Management: Honeywell
Provide access/network to many Kairos
service providers:
- remote servicing/configuration
Plant Eq. Monitoring
- on demand analysis & diagnostics
OEM Process Monitoring
Core Honeywell team Instrument Support
ensures success
Adding real-time expert
monitoring for
fixed equipment
Opportunities for You and Operating
Plants to consider ..
Operational Performance Excellence
requires a solid performance of the
regulatory layer AND process optimization.
For Plant Operators:
Is your feed stable?
Are your instruments calibrated and performing?
Are you aware of wireless instruments (including vibration)?
Is your control system up to date and stable?
Are you in manual or auto control?
Are your Operators acting on alarms or are they nuisance?
Do you understand and accept your process variability?
Are you operating within the design targets and process constraints?
(pumps, cyclones, supplies, thickeners, roasters, furnaces, etc. etc.)
Are you using your surge capacity, . or running tight level control?
Are you at optimum and are the controls robust?
Are you benefiting from asset management systems?
Are failure / fault detection systems implemented?
Can you make the same product for less energy, or material consumption?
Do you Operate with or without a Control Engineer?
Wrap Up .
My Recommendations:
Instrumentations & Instrumentation Solutions .
Make them work for you and use more of the great instrumentation currently
available.
Control Systems .
Push your control system to keep delivering for you, reducing variability;
Use more feedforward, cascade controls & ensure controllers are tuned;
Seek input from you supplier and ensure you use what the system can do;
Automate tedious and repetitive, known tasks;
Focus on optimization and see better business performance.
Employ a Control Engineer to complement your Operations and
Instrumentation Teams.
Use Asset, Performance Monitoring tools to be more proactive.
Analyze, Act and ensure data becomes knowledge for Business
($$) actions always.
(P. Thwaites, CMP 2013 Plenary lecture; CIM DL Series 2012-13)
Acknowledgements