Agenda 2017 2 7 Meeting

Shakopee City Council
February 7, 2017
7:00 PM
City Council Chambers 129 Holmes
Street South
Shakopee Mission Statement

The Mission of the City of Shakopee is toprovide the opportunity to live, work and play in a community
with a proud past, promising future, and small town atmosphere within a metropolitan setting.
Agenda items are tied to the following long-term goals that support the City's strategic vision as noted after each
agenda item.
A. Keep Shakopee a safe and healthy community where residents can pursue active and quality lifestyles.
B. Positively manage the challenges and opportunities presented by growth development and change.
C. Maintain the City's strong financial health.
D. Maintain improve and create strong partnerships with other public and private sector entities.
E. Deliver effective and efficient public services by a staff of well-trained, caring, and professional employees.
F. Housekeeping item.
Mayor Bill Mars presiding
1. Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Special Presentation
A. Engineer of the Year Award
B. Project of the Year Award
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After a discussion by
the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to remove any items from the
consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items removed will be considered following the Public
hearing portion of the agenda. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will
be approved in one motion.)
A. Public Works and Engineering
A.1. *Authorize an Amendment to Consultant Contracts
A.2. *Authorize Quotes for Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Project No. 2017-4
B. Personnel
B.1. *Approval of Pay Equity Report, Res. No. 7828
B.2. *Approval to Enter into Contract with Keystone Compensation Group, Res. No. 7829
C. Parks and Recreation
C.1. *Authorization to Submit a Federal Recreational Trail Program Application for Trails to
Memorial Park Bridge, Res. No. 7830 (A)
C.2. *Authorization to Contract with WSB & Associates, Inc. for the Design, Specifications
and Construction Services for the Phase 2 Development of Quarry Lake Park
C.3. *Authorization to Submit a Federal Recreational Trail Program Application for the
Memorial Park Bridge, Res. No. 7831 (A)
D. General Administration
D.1. *City Bill List
D.2. *City Council Minutes
D.3. *Tobacco License for Empire Gas & Grocery LLC
D.4. *Temporary Liquor License - Shakopee Senior Graduation Party Inc.
D.5. *Temporary Liquor License - Parish of Saint Joachim & Anne
6. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED CITIZENS BY CITY COUNCIL - Provides an opportunity for the
public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Comments should not be more
than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that time limit based upon the number of persons
seeking to comment. This comment period may not be used to make personal attacks, to air
personality grievances, to make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council
Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens, and questions from Council will be for clarification
only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to react to the comments made, but rather
for informational purposes only.
7. Business removed from consent will be discussed at this time
8. General Business
A. Planning and Development
A.1. Ordinance for Text Amendment to regulate location of Massage Establishments to the B-1
Zone as a Conditional Use
A.2. Review of City-owned Property
B. Parks and Recreation
B.1. Discuss the Revised Plans for the Lions Park Warming House Project No. PR2016-2
(A,B)
C. General Administration
C.1. Monthly Financial Review
C.2. 2016 Community Survey
C.3. City Hall Construction Update and Approval of Contracts for Furnishings, Audio-Visual
Equipment and Installation and Low Voltage Equipment and Installation
9. Liaison and Administration
10. Other Business
11. Closed Session
12. Adjournment to February 14, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.
B.

MEMO
FROM:
TO:
Subject:
Policy/Action Requested:
Recommendation:
Discussion:
Budget Impact:
ATTACHMENTS:
CEAM Award Nomination

City Engineers Association of MN (CEAM)
Municipal Project of the Year Award for 2016
Nomination Form
(Please Type or Print Three Page Application Form Plus up to 10 Additional Sheets)
Submit Application Electronically to Marc Culver, Roseville Public Works Director
At marc.culver@cityofroseville.com
Deadline is November 29, 2016
APPLICATIONS MUST BE FOR MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT

PROJECTS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED IN 2016
Projects will be scored on the items below. Note that items 7-13 will be scored as a group for a total of 40
percentage points for Project Elements. Therefore, if you did not, for example, have a particularly notable
Community Relations component to your project, but your Environmental Considerations were outstanding,
focus the narrative on that element and you wont be penalized for not having the Community Relations
element.
1. Name of Project: SANITARYSEWERLATERALPIPEREHABILITATIONPROGRAM
2. Name and Address of the following:
a) Municipality: CityofShakopee
BruceLoney,PE;PublicWorksDirector
500GormanSt
Shakopee,MN55379
b) Prime Contractor: National WaterMainCleaningCompany (NWMCC)

JamesLounsbery
1806NewarkTurnpike
KearnyNJ07032
c) Design Engineer: ShortElliottHendrickson,Inc.

PaulJ.PaskoIII
10901RedCircleDrive,Suite300
Minnetonka,MN55343
3. Brief description of project (electronic photographs and renderings may be submitted if desired).
TheCityofShakopeetookaproactiveapproachtosewermaintenancewithamultiyearprojecttostrengthen
privatelyownedsanitarysewerlateralpipes.Thenodigmethodofinstallinganewpipeinsideofanexisting
lateralpipesignificantlyreducesthechanceoffailure,andprotectstheCitysinvestmentinstreetsand
boulevards.
AttheconclusionofShakopeesstreetrehabilitationproject,theonlyoldpipe
remainingunderthenewstreetsweretheprivatelyownedlaterals.Tosafeguardits
investmentinnewstreetpavement,adjacentboulevardrestorationandexisting
boulevardtreestheCityisrehabilitatingtheselateralsatitsownexpenseusingthe
trenchlessblindshotCuredInPlacePipe(CIPP)method.Shakopeeisthefirst
communityintheTwinCitiestospecifytheblindshotmethodofinstallingCIPPat
lengthsof2530ft.Intheillustrationprovided,theportionofthesanitarysewer
lateralpipesthatwasrehabilitatediscoloredred.
Nomination Form
Besidesrehabilitatingthelateralpipefromthesewer
maintojustbeyondthecurbandgutter,thisCIPP
methodalsoincludesafullcircumferentialCIPPwrap
ofthemainextendingabout1ft.upanddownstream
ofthelateral,andisinstalledwithoutneedinga
cleanouttoaccesstheupstreamendofthelateral
pipe.TheCityofShakopeewillrehabilitate
approximately150lateralsperyearoverafiveyear
period.

4. Final completion date contained in contract and any authorized time extension.
Startingin2015andcontinuingthroughatleast2019,theCitywillrehabilitate
approximately150lateralsperyear.Phase1oftheprojectincludedrehabilitating
144lateralpipeswithinthenineblockresidentialarea.
Phase1constructionbeganinSeptember2015,andtheprojectwassubstantially
completeinNovemberof2015.Currently,Phase1isinitsCorrectionPeriod,
throughNovemberof2017whenafinalinspectionwillbeperformedandthe
contractclosed.
Theprojectwascompletedonschedule,withallcontractworkrelatedtothe
rehabilitationcompletedwithin11weeks.Nocontracttimeextensionswere
needed.

5. Public benefit and service nature of project.

Completionofthisprojectensuresthatpropertyownerswillnotincurtheexpenseorinconvenienceofa
sewerlateralpipefailurebeneaththeCitysstreets.TheprojectisfundedentirelybytheCitysEnterprise
fund.
6. Design characteristics and features or innovations.

TheblindshotmethodofinstallingCIPPincludestheinstallationoftheCIPP
byenteringasewermanholeinthestreet,andnavigatingthesewermain
withroboticequipmentandshootingtheCIPPlinerintothelateralpipe,
withouttheneedofacleanoutorexcavationtoaccessthelateralpipe
itself.
Applyingthisinnovativemethodonaprojectofthismagnituderequires
highlyskilledcontractors.SEHsprojectteamdeterminedhowtoattract
outofstatecontractorstoShakopeeataneconomicalbidprice.Exhaustive
researchwithengineersandcontractorsaroundthecountryrevealedthat
thewaytodoitwastocreativelydevelopbiddingdocumentsallowing
contractorstoinstalllinersmeetingeitherASTM1216orASTM2561to
challengeeachotherbybiddingtheprojectheadtohead.
IntheCityofShakopee,theprimaryreasonforthefailureofagingsewer
lateralpipesisrootintrusion.ProductsmeetingeitherASTM1216orASTM
2561areeffectiveinprovidingthestructuralrehabilitationofthesewer
lateralpipestopreventfuturefailurebyrootintrusion.BecausetheCity
allowedproductsmeetingeitherspecification,thepoolofcontractorsthat
Nomination Form
areabletocompletetheworkincreasedsignificantly,creatingamplecompetitionandtheresulting
competitivepricing.
7. Construction management scheduling and control techniques used.

Fromthestart,theprojectteamknewdetailedcoordinationandtimingwereessentialinordertoefficiently
completeeachphaseoftheprojectandminimizeinconveniencetothepropertyowners.Toachievethis,the
CityrequiredthattheContractorfollowthestepbystepprocedureasoutlined:
Foreachmanholetomanholesegmentofthesanitarysewercollectionsysteminthe
project,thecontractorwouldfirstcleaneachlateralpipe,andperformavideo
inspectionofeachlateralpipedocumentingitsconditionpriortorehabilitation.Next
theContractorwouldsubmittheirproposedplanforrehabilitationofeachlateral
pipe,requestingtheCitysapprovaltocompletetherehabilitation.Onceapproval
wasobtained,theContractorwouldcommencerehabilitationofthelateralpipesin
theapprovedsegment.
Usingthismethod,theContractorcompletedtherehabilitationonastreetbystreet
basismethodicallycompletingtheprojectfromeasttowest.Astheproject
progressed,therehabilitationstatuswaspublishedontheprojectwebpage,and
eNotificationsweresentalertingsubscriberstotheContractorswhereaboutsand
theirplansforcompletingtheremainingworkontheproject.
8. Environmental considerations summary of steps taken to protect the environment during construction
and compatibility of finished project with the pre-existing environment.
CIPPtechnologyofferssignificantsustainableenvironmentalbenefitscomparedtothetraditionaldigand
replacemethod.Thismethodofrehabilitatingexistinglateralpipesrequiresnoexcavationordisturbanceto
existinginfrastructure,whileminimizingimpactstothesurroundingenvironment.Successfulrehabilitationvia
CIPPextendstheservicelifeofthelateralpipebyatleast50years.
Byusingtheblindshotmethod,theCitywasabletoavoidtheenvironmentalimpactscausedbyexcavations
andtheirsubsequentrestorationactivities,aswellasthetime,monetarycosts,andnuisancetoproperty
ownersassociatedwiththeinstallationofcleanouts.
9. Community relations Summary of efforts to protect public lives and property, minimize public
inconvenience, and improve relations between contractor personnel and the public.
Inpreparationfortheconstructionphaseoftheproject,SEHandtheCityusedamultimediacampaignto
educatepropertyownersaboutwhyandhowtheCitywouldrehabilitatethefirst30feetoftheirlateralpipes.
TheCityalsodesignedaninternalprocesstoassistpropertyownerswhomightwishtohiretheirown
contractortorehabilitatethebalanceoftheirlateralpipe,afterconstructionontheCityscontractwas
complete.TheCityhostedalivepublicinformational
meetingwhichwasrecordedandpostedontheCitys
projectspecificwebpage,forfutureviewing.
Onceconstructionbegan,theCityutilizedtheproject
webpage,mapsandvideospostedonthatwebpage,
andtheCityseNotificationtooltocommunicateproject
updatesandotherimportantinformationtosubscribers.
Inaddition,theContractoruseddoorhangersandface
tofacecommunicationtocoordinatetherehabilitation
ofeachlateralpipewithintheproject,andminimizethe
inconveniencetothepropertyowners.
Nomination Form
Uponcompletionoftheconstructionphaseoftheproject,aletterwassenttoeachpropertyownerdescribing
theresultsoftherehabilitationoftheirpipe.Italsoincludedinstructionsforhowtoaccessthevideofootage
ofthepostrehabilitationconditionoftheirpipeontheCitysGIS,andinformationabouthowtorehabilitate
therestoftheirpipe,ifthepropertyownerwishes.

10. Safety performance and overall safety program employed during construction.

AllNationalWaterMainCleaningCompany(NWMCC)employeessubmittoacomprehensive
orientationprogram,whichincludesextensivesafetytraining.Trainingtopicspresentedinorientation
areintendedtoexposetheteamtoadiversesenseofthesafetycultureoutlinedspecifically
throughout29CFR1910and29CFR1926OSHAregulationssothattheycanbegintobuildasafety
culturefoundationintheGeneralIndustryandConstructionIndustry.

Aftersuccessfulcompletionofachallengingprobationaryemploymentperiod,thenewemployeesof
NWMCCarerequiredtoattendmandatoryannualsustainmenttraining,whichservesasarefresheron
thesafetycoursestheyoriginallyattended,inadditiontoprovidingupdatesonregulations,statues,
policiesandprocedures.AlltrainingcoursesprovidedtoNWMCCemployeesfollowOSHAs29CFR
1910.120App.EregulationswhereasNWMCChasatrainingfacility,Instructor,coursematerials,
proficiencyassessments,andadministrativesupport.

Withdedicatedpersonnel,excellentcommunicationbetweenthefieldcrews,projectmanagerand
Shakopeeofficials,andthankstodetaileddailyreports,theprojectwasstreamlinedandaccurate.

NWMCCwastaskedtoclean,televise,andinstallmorethan100laterallinersduringan11week
period.TheNWMCCFieldSuperintendentprovidedoversightforthisproject,whichincluded
supervising,mentoring,troubleshootingmechanicalandmaintenancefailures,orderingand
maintainingaccuratesupplies,andensuringthatallcrewsworkedsafelyanddiligentlywhileobtaining
fieldproductionatarateneverachievedbeforebyanyothercrewinthehistoryofNWMCCslateral
liningdivision.

NWMCCsOSHA/DOTComplianceAdministratoroversawthecrewsdeployedforthisassignmentand
ensuredthattheirsafetytrainingwasutilizedtoitsfullestpotential.Confinedspaceswereentered
multipletimesaday,withoutincident;fallprotectionwasusedseveraltimesashift,withoutincident;
materialwaspreppedandinstalledeveryday,withoutincidentorexposure;safetyequipmentwas
worndayinanddayout,withoutincident;etc.MattandtheOSHA/DOTComplianceAdministrator
spokeonceaweektocommunicateallSafetyandDOTupdates;noviolationswerereportedandall
inspectionswerepassedbynumerousagencieswhoinspectedourvehicles.ThemenonNWMCCs
crewsassignedtotheShakopeeprojectshowedwhatNWMCCstruecapabilitiesarewithgreat
leadership,communication,andteamwork.NWMCCcontinuestostrivetowardsexcellenceandthe
ExecutiveManagementcontinuestoseethatwithouremployeeseveryday.

Nomination Form
11. Unusual accomplishments under adverse conditions; including but not limited to adverse weather, soil, or
other site conditions or constraints over which the contractor had no control.
Twocommonproblemsthatchallengenearlyeverylateral
CIPPliningprojectarethepresenceofbroken/offsetpipe
jointsandrootintrusion.Fortunately,onlyonelateralhad
anoffsetjointsevereenoughtowarranttheinstallationofa
cleanouttosupportcleaning,inspectionandliningofthat
particularlateral.NWMCCalsoencounteredonebroken
lateralpipe.Thebreakwasinthefloorofthepipe(see
photosatright,thepreandpostrehabilitationconditionof
thepipe).
ThisbreaksnaggedNWMCCscleaningequipmentasitwentpastthebreak.
NWMCChadtorescueitscleaningequipmentfromthelateralbyinstallinga
cleanout.
However,rootintrusionwasamorecommonprobleminShakopee.Someofthe
rootintrusionchallengesdealtwithbyNWMCC.Onelateralrequiredthe
installationofacleanoutjusttoremovetherootsinthepipe.TheCityanticipatesissuinga$35,000change
orderacknowledgingheavyrootcleaningcompletedbyNWMCC.TheCitydecidedhowmuchrootcleaning
toconsiderheavyafterconsideringthecontentsoftheirpostrehabilitatonCCTVinspectionsfromtheproject
areaspreviouslycompletedmainrehabilitationproject.
TheCityhadmadetheseCCTVinspectionsavailabletothe
biddersduringthepreparationofbidsinanefforttoassist
bidderswiththecalculationoftheirbidunitpricesfor
cleaningandinspectingtheprojectareaslaterals(see
photosatrightofrootsthatwereremovedduringthe
project).
12. Construction innovations.

ThestakesarehighinblindshotCIPP.Theprocessistoenterasewermanholeinthestreet,navigatethe
sewermainwithroboticequipmentandshoottheCIPPlinerintothelateralpipewithouttheneedofaclean
outorexcavation.Mistakescouldresultinmaterialsand/orequipmentfailurethatwouldrequireexcavation
defeatingthepurposeofthenodigmethod.
Tominimizethechancesoffailure,andsuccessfullyemploytheblindshotmethod,theContractormusttake
precisemeasurementstocorrectlysizeandmanufacturetheCIPPmaterials.Inadditiontocarefulpreparation
ofthereceivinglateralpipe,andtheCIPPmaterialsthemselves,theContractorisresponsibleformeticulously
maintainingtheroboticequipmentandthecamerasusedtoremotelyshoottheCIPPlinerintothelateral
pipe.Theconfigurationoftheroboticequipmentandcamerasusediscustomizedforeachrehabilitation,and
mustbeproperlyplannedforthesuccessfulrehabilitationofeachlateralpipe.Forthisreason,ongoing
maintenance,properlytrainedandexperiencedcontractors,andseamlessplanningandcommunicationis
criticaltotheoverallsuccessoftheproject,andtheminimizationofimpactstopropertyowners.

Nomination Form
13. Construction quality.

Priortotheactualrehabilitation,eachlateralpipewasthoroughlycleanedand
aCCTVinspectionwasperformedtodocumenttheprerehabilitationcondition.
OnlyafterreviewingandapprovingtheinspectionfootageandtheContractors
rehabilitationplan,wouldtherehabilitationprocessbegin.
Specialcarewastakenthroughouttherehabilitationprocesstoensurethatthe
productwasinstalledinaqualitymanner.Duringeachrehabilitation,the
contractormaintainedadetailedlogwhichrecordedtheinstallationpractices
toensurequality.Thislogcontainedinformationrelatingtotheambient
weather,fabriclinertubelotnumberandmeasurements,resinlotnumbers
andmixproportions,curetemperatureandtime,hostpipemainandlateral
measurementsandmaterialtype,andthephysicalstreetaddressassociated
witheachrehabilitation.
Afterrehabilitationwascomplete,eachlateralpipewasagainsubjectedtoa
CCTVinspection,todocumentthepostrehabilitationcondition,andtoensurethatthelateral
pipewassatisfactorilyrehabilitatedandwasnotobstructedpriortoitsreturntoregularuse.
Beforeeachphaseoftheprojectiscompletedandthecontractclosed,aCorrectionPeriod
CCTVinspectionwillalsobeperformed(attwoyearsaftersubstantialcompletion),toensure
thatthelateralpiperemainsinasatisfactory,unobstructedcondition,andthattheCIPP
continuestoshownoevidenceoflossofintegrity.UponacceptanceoftheCorrectionPeriod
CCTVinspectionsandclosureofthecontract,thefiveyearwarrantyperiodwillbegin.
AlloftheseCCTVinspectionvideosareavailabletopropertyownerstoviewontheCitysGIS
iftheywish.

14. Nominated by (Deadline is November 29, 2016)
Printed Name: Jennifer Schumann Date: 11/28/16
Address: 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302
Phone: 952-912-2613
15. Name of public agency administering the contract:

CityofShakopee
A.1.

MEMO
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director

TO: Mayor and Council Members
Subject:
Authorize Amendment to Consultant Contracts.
Authorize the appropriate city officials to execute an Amendment to the Consultant Contracts.
Recommendation:
To extend the consultant contracts for municipal engineering services to December 31, 2017.
Discussion:
The current contracts with the three city consultants for municipal engineering services had an
expiration date of March 15, 2015. The City is doing business with WSB & Associates, Bolton &
Menk, Inc. and SEH, Inc. currently. It is best to extend the contracts to the end of this year. Attached
is an amendment to the consultant contracts as drafted by our City Attorney. It would be staffs intent
to extend the contracts to the end of 2017 and go for a consultant selection process at the end of this
year.
Budget Impact:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
WSB & Associates, Inc. Amendment to Consultant Contract

Bolton & Menk, Inc. Amendment to Consultant Contract
SEH, Inc. Amendment to Consultant Contract
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of February 7, 2017, by and between
the City of Shakopee, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Minnesota, (City) and WSB & Associates, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (Consultant).
RECITALS
1. The City and the Consultant entered into a Consultant Contract dated July 8, 2011
(Contract) pursuant to which Consultant agreed to perform professional services to the City.
2. The City and the Consultant desire to extend the terms of the Contract until
December 31, 2017.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and
conditions contained in this Agreement, the City and the Consultant agree as follows:
1. Section III.C of the Contract is amended to read:
C. Period. This agreement shall be effective until December 31, 2017,

unless terminated earlier as provided herein.
2. Except as otherwise modified in this Agreement, all other provisions in the

Contract remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Consultant have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed on the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WSB & Associates, Inc. By_________________________________

Mayor
By___________________________ By_________________________________
Its_________________________ City Administrator
1
493290v1 JJT SH155-23E
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Minnesota, (City) and Bolton & Menk, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (Consultant).
RECITALS
December 31, 2017.


Bolton & Menk, Inc. By_________________________________

Mayor
By___________________________ By_________________________________
1
493290v1 JJT SH155-23E
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Minnesota, (City) and SEH, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (Consultant).
RECITALS
December 31, 2017.


SEH, Inc. By_________________________________

Mayor
By___________________________ By_________________________________
1
493290v1 JJT SH155-23E
A.2.

MEMO
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director

Subject:
Authorize staff to obtain quotes for Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation.
To receive the Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation Engineering Report and to authorize staff to obtain
quotes for rehabilitation of 13 manholes.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends to rehabilitate the poor and fair manholes as identified in the preliminary
engineering report of the sanitary sewer manhole evaluations.
Discussion:
A total of 57 manholes were inspected to determine the corrosion levels on concrete manholes.
Microbiologically induced corrosion occurs when hydration sulfide compounds are transformed into
sulfuric acid which affects the cement of the concrete. Staff had discovered corrosion of concrete
manholes during inspections while doing routine jetting maintenance. Three manholes were classified
as poor and 12 manholes were described as fair. Two of the fair manholes staff believes belong to
MCES. Staff is requesting authorization to rehabilitate 13 manholes. SEH, Inc. will obtain quotes for
rehabilitation of manholes and for the method appropriate for each manhole. These quotes would be
brought back later for council approval.
Budget Impact:
The 2017 CIP had an estimated project cost of $230,000.00. The current estimate is for the sanitary
sewer manhole rehabilitation work to be roughly $100,000.00. Staff is also checking with MCES on
any possible cost reimbursement.
ATTACHMENTS:
SEH, Inc. Manhole Replacement Memo

SEH, Inc. Preliminary Cost Estimate Letter
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bruce Loney, PE
FROM: Jennifer Schumann

Kaitlin Swanson
Emily Steinweg
Mike Ostendorf
DATE: January 4, 2017
RE: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report

SEH No. SHAKO 139429 14.00
Background
The City of Shakopee has retained Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) to provide inspection services and
condition analysis of sanitary sewer manholes as part of the Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation
scope of services agreement dated October 3, 2016. This Memorandum is the deliverable for Phase 2, including
discussion of our findings and alternatives for rehabilitation along with estimated costs associated with each
alternative. This Memorandum is intended to serve as a discussion guide to facilitate further discussions with City
Staff to ultimately select a rehabilitation method to be used in the remaining Phases 3 and 4 of this project.
The project location is within the City of Shakopee along US Hwy 169 and is bounded by Marystown Road on the
west to Gateway Drive on the east. See the attached Figures 1 4 for the project location. A total of 57 manholes
were inspected on November 21 and December 6 during Phase 1 of the project. Inspection of the manholes
determined corrosion to be the primary concern.
Corrosion has occurred within the manholes included in this study, resulting from the microbiologically induced
corrosion (MIC) process that takes place in wastewater collection systems. MIC occurs when hydrogen sulfide
compounds are transformed into sulfuric acid, in the presence of bacteria and oxygen. MIC takes place directly
over the wastewater surface, and can quickly cause serious structural damage. Rehabilitation of select manholes
experiencing MIC may result in the migration of bacteria to a more suitable environment, such as a nearby
unprotected concrete manhole.
Evaluation of Defects
Each manholes condition was rated from very poor to excellent condition based on the level of corrosion
present. The ratings are listed in Table 1, and are shown on the attached Figures 1 - 4. There were six ratings
used for the manholes including very poor, poor, fair, good, very good and excellent. No evidence of inflow
or infiltration was discovered. See the below descriptions and photos illustrating each condition rating.
Very Poor
Manholes having a rating of very poor would show evidence of heavy corrosion throughout the entire depth of
the structure, exposed aggregate and exposed reinforcing steel. No manholes were rated as very poor. Very
poor manholes are recommended to be rehabilitated within 6 months to 1 year.
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists

Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302
SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax
Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report
January 4, 2017
Page 2
Poor
The poor condition rating includes heavy corrosion throughout the majority of the manhole and exposed
aggregate. Three of the 57 manholes inspected received a rating of poor. Poor manholes are recommended to
be rehabilitated within 1 to 2 years. The photo below illustrates a poor condition rating.
Fair
A fair condition rating indicates light to moderate corrosion along with exposed aggregate. Twelve of the 57
manholes inspected received a rating of fair. Fair manholes are recommended to be rehabilitated within 2 to 5
years. The photo below illustrates a fair condition rating.
January 4, 2017
Page 3
Good
Good condition includes the majority of the manhole to exhibit no to light corrosion with some moderate
corrosion. Eighteen of the 57 manholes inspected received a rating of good. No rehabilitation is recommended
for good manholes. These manholes should be inspected regularly to assess any change in condition. The photo
below illustrates a good condition rating.
Very Good
Very good condition ratings include very light to light corrosion. Fifteen of the 57 manholes inspected received a
rating of very good. No rehabilitation is recommended for very good manholes. These manholes should be
inspected regularly to assess any change in condition. The photo below illustrates a very good condition rating.
January 4, 2017
Page 4
Excellent
An excellent condition rating indicates no to very light corrosion. Nine of the 57 manholes inspected received a
rating of excellent. No rehabilitation is recommended for excellent manholes. These manholes should be
inspected regularly to assess any change in condition. The photo below illustrates an excellent condition rating.
The condition ratings for each manhole can be seen below in Table 1:
January 4, 2017
Page 5
Table 1 Manhole Evaluation Results

ManholeBuild ConditionRating Phase1
ManholeID
Height[ft] VeryPoor Poor Fair Good VeryGood Excellent Repair[ft]
ED281 21.3 X
ED282 18.7 X 18.7
ED283 19.2 X 19.2
ED283A 16.9 X
ED287 16.2 X
ED288 17.3 X
ED289 17.7 X
ED302 10.7 X
ED303** 0.0 X
ED304 9.0 X
ED306 12.2 X 12.2
ID111 21.8 X 21.8
ID112 21.3 X
ID113 21.3 X
ID114 23.3 X
ID115 24.4 X
ID116 22.4 X
ID31 9.0 X 9.0
ID32 13.6 X
ID33 11.9 X
ID34 12.9 X
ID35 11.3 X
ID90 23.8 X 23.8
ID91 21.2 X 21.2
ID92 23.6 X 23.6
ID93 22.3 X 22.3
ID94 21.4 X
ID95 20.4 X
ID96 20.7 X
ID97 21.3 X
MC5744 31.3 X
MC5747A 22.6 X 22.6
MC5749A** 0.0 X
MC5774 25.0 X 25.0
SS346 17.8 X
SS384 13.7 X
SS391 12.8 X
SS483a 13.2 X
SS497 19.1 X
SS531 13.0 X
SS549 14.8 X
SS550 9.0 X
SS565 10.3 X
SS566 22.8 X 22.8
SS567 22.4 X
SS568 20.9 X
SS569 21.3 X
SS576 16.7 X
SS577 17.4 X
SS578 15.2 X
SS725 15.8 X
SS737 25.7 X 25.7
SS768* 25.0 X
VP177 15.6 X 15.6
VP178 13.8 X 13.8
VP179 12.8 X
VP180 13.0 X
Totals 987.7 0 3 12 18 15 9 296.9
*ManholenumbershowninFigures14doesnotmatchthatshownondrawingspreviouslysuppliedbytheCity.
**Manholewasnotaccessiblewiththecamera,howeveravisualinspectionwasperformedinthefield.
January 4, 2017
Page 6
Alternatives for Rehabilitation

Five rehabilitation methods are being considered for rehabilitation of the manholes. The alternatives include
Geopolymer Lining, Polyurethane Coating, Three-Layer Polyuria System, Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP)
Insert and Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining System. See the below discussion for descriptions of each alternative.
Geopolymer Lining
A geoplymer repair lining provides corrosion resistance, structural integrity and infiltration resistance. The
geopolymer consists of fiber reinforced, cementitious like material made from pozzolanic materials and
monocrystalline quartz aggregate. A one-half to three-inch application using pressure spraying or spinning is
recommended. A two coat application of a curing compound may be required based on humidity in the structure.
The initial cure time is approximately an hour and the final cure time may take up to two hours.
Polyurethane Coating
A solvent free, 100% solids polyurethane coating provides corrosion resistance, elongation, flexibility, high build
potential, high impermeability and a rapid application. Low permeability protects sewage systems from H2S gas
and metal surfaces from corrosive atmospheres. It can be sprayed in one surface application, be immersed
immediately, cures in 7 days, and does not require any heating, baking or follow-up treatment.
Three-Layer Polyuria System

This three-layer system includes a primer with silicone modified polyuria, a second layer made of closed cell
polyurethane foam and a final layer for corrosion made of silicone modified polyuria. The three layers seal, protect
and resurface manholes. An impervious barrier is created that protects against groundwater intrusion, rapid
temperature changes, leaking and other wastewater structural damage.
FRP Insert
A FRP insert is a one piece precast piece that can be dropped into an existing manhole and will act as a
freestanding manhole. The existing casting and cone are removed and replaced using this rehabilitation method
and grout is placed in between the existing manhole and the insert. The insert provides both structural and
corrosion resistance. The bench configuration of the manhole can be a part of the insert as one piece, can have
coatings applied or have fiberglass laminated to it. Installation of the insert typically takes 3 days per manhole.
Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining System

The Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining consists of the above Geopolymer Lining used in combination with an Epoxy
Lining. When the combination is spray-applied to at least a half-inch thickness, it is a monothlitic liner with
compressive and flexural strengths that exceed the original structure. The benefit of combining the Geopolymer
Lining with Epoxy Lining is increased corrosion resistance.
Table 2 Summary of Rehabilitation Alternatives

Approximate Bypass Approximate Structural? Excavation
cost [$/foot]* Required? time to rehab Required?
Geopolymer Lining $380 No 6-8 hours Yes No
Polyurethane Coating $430 Yes 6-8 hours No No
Three-Layer Polyuria $360 Yes 6-8 hours Yes No

System
FRP Insert $1,500 Case 3 days Yes Yes
Dependent
Geopolymer with $620 Yes 1.5 days Yes No
Epoxy Lining System
*Assuming a 4-foot diameter manhole
January 4, 2017
Page 7
Recommendations
Rehabilitation is recommended during the 2017 construction season for all manholes having a condition rating of
very poor, poor, and fair.
Use of the FRP Insert and Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining are discouraged, because they are cost prohibitive.
We recommend allowing contractors to select the rehabilitation product / method, from the following: Geopolymer
Lining, Polyurethane Coating, or Three-Layer Polyuria System. By allowing all three products / methods, the City
will realize greater competition in pricing, for different products that provide similar rehabilitation benefits.
Re-inspection is recommended every 2 years for manholes noted to have good, very good, and excellent
condition ratings. Rehabilitation of select manholes may impact the deterioration rates of other manholes in close
proximity, due to MIC migration.
Additionally, the City should work in coordination with MCES in an effort to ensure that chemical addition
impacting the Citys collection system is performed and monitored for effectiveness.
p:\pt\s\shako\139429\4-prelim-dsgn-rpts\memo\manhole rehabilitation memo.docx
SS384
SS391
SS565
SS550 SS549
SS531 SS497
Legend
SS566
Project Boundary
SS567
City Manholes
City Sanitary Sewer
SS568
Inspected City Manholes
SS576
Excellent - (9)
Very Good - (15)
Pa th : \\s e h mp 1 \P ro je c ts\P T\S\S h a ko \1 3 94 2 9 \5 -fi na l -d sg n \5 1 -d ra w i ng s \9 0- GIS \Ma p B o ok _ EL S .mx d
SS569
SS577 Good - (18)
Fair - (12)
SS578
Poor - (3)
Very Poor - (0)
MCES Interceptors
Interceptor (Gravity main)
Interceptor (Forcemain)
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation

Pro ject: S HAKO 13 942 9
Figure
I
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. Prin t Da te : 12 /2 8/20 16
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
City of Shakopee
1
PHONE: (651) 490-2000 Ma p b y: E L S
0 250 500 Feet

FAX: (888) 908-8166 Pro j e cti on : N A D 1 98 3 U TM Zo n e 1 5N
TF: (800) 325-2055 So u rc e: C i ty o f Sh a k o pe e
www.sehinc.com
This map is ne ither a l egally reco rde d m ap n or a survey map and is not i ntende d t o be used as one. T his m ap is a compi lati on o f re cords, inf orm ation , and d ata gath ere d f rom vari ous sources li st ed on t his map and is t o be used for re ference purpose s only. SE H does not warrant t hat t he G eographic Inf ormat ion S yst em (GI S) Data used to prepare t his m ap are error free, and S EH does n ot represe nt that t he GI S Data can be used for navigat ional, t racki ng, or an y ot her purpose re quiring exact ing m easu rem ent of distance or direct ion or precision in the depict ion of geographic feat ures. T he user of t his m ap a cknowl edges t hat S EH shall not be liabl e
for any dam ages whi ch arise out of t he user's access or use of dat a provi ded.
Legend
Project Boundary
City Manholes ED287
City Sanitary Sewer

ED283
Excellent - (9)
Very Good - (15)
Good - (18)
Fair - (12)
Poor - (3)
Very Poor - (0)
MCES Interceptors MC5744

384
SS483A
SS346

Figure
I
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
City of Shakopee
2
PHONE: (651) 490-2000 Ma p b y: E L S
0 250 500 Feet

www.sehinc.com
ED289
ID114
VP178
ED288
VP177
ED283A
ID116
ID115
ED287 ED282
ED283 VP180 VP179

ED281
MC5747A
ED304
Legend
ED306
Project Boundary
ED303
ED302 MC5749A City Manholes
SS725
City Sanitary Sewer
Excellent - (9)
MC5744
Very Good - (15)
Good - (18)
Fair - (12)
Poor - (3)
Very Poor - (0)
MCES Interceptors

Figure
I
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
City of Shakopee
3
PHONE: (651) 490-2000 Ma p b y: E L S
0 250 500 Feet

www.sehinc.com
Legend
Project Boundary
City Manholes
City Sanitary Sewer
Excellent - (9)
Very Good - (15)
Good - (18)
Fair - (12) ID97
Poor - (3)
Very Poor - (0) ID96
ID95
MCES Interceptors ID31
ID32
Interceptor (Gravity main) ID33
ID34
ID35 ID94
Interceptor (Forcemain) SS737 MC5774
ID93
ID91
ID92
ID90
ID111
SS768
ID112
ID113
ID114

Figure
I
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
ID115
City of Shakopee
4
PHONE: (651) 490-2000 Ma p b y: E L S
0 250 500 Feet

www.sehinc.com
February 1, 2017 RE: City of Shakopee
2017 Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Rehabilitation
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SEH No. SHAKO 139429 14.00
Bruce Loney, PE
Public Works Director
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes St. S.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Dear Bruce:
On January 3, 2017 SEH sent the Preliminary Engineering Report Memorandum (Memo) to the City of
Shakopee, which contains the inspection results from Phase 1, and our analysis and recommendations
for Phase 2 of the referenced project. In response to recent discussions with your staff regarding our
recommendations, we are sending you the Preliminary Cost Estimate for the rehabilitation of the 13
manholes that have been selected for rehabilitation in 2017. The total build height for the 13 manholes is
about 250 feet.
Please recall from our Memo that we recommend allowing contractors to quote any one of the three
recommended rehabilitation methods. The estimated pricing for each of the recommended rehabilitation
methods is as follows:
Rehabilitation Method Approximate cost [$/foot]*

Geopolymer Lining $380
Polyurethane Coating $430
Three-Layer Polyuria System $360
*Assuming a 4-foot diameter manhole
Applying the median cost of $380/foot for the 13 manholes results in an estimated total construction cost
of $95,000. Procurement using competitive quotes is recommended because we anticipate project costs
being less than $100,000.
Please contact me with questions or comments at mostendorf@sehinc.com or 651.280.0679.
Sincerely,
Michael H. Ostendorf, PE
Project Manager
p:\pt\s\shako\139429\4-prelim-dsgn-rpts\preliminary cost estimate\20170201 preliminary cost estimate letter.docx
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists

Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302
SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax
B.1.

MEMO
FROM: Jennifer Gabbard

Subject:
Approval to Submit Pay Equity Report, Resolution No. 7828.
Approval to Submit Pay Equity Report, Resolution No. 7828
Recommendation:
I recommend the adoption of the proposed resolution.
Discussion:
Budget Impact:
There is no budgetary impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 7828 - Approval of 2016 Pay Equity Report

2016 Compliance Report
2016 Jobs Report
2016 Predicted Pay Report
2016 Implementation Form
RESOLUTION NO. 7828
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF SHAKOPEES

2016 PAY EQUITY COMPLIANCE REPORT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,

MINNESOTA, that they City of Shakopees 2016 Pay Equity Compliance Report is hereby
approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is authorized to sign and the City
Administrator is directed to submit the report to the State of Minnesota, to be in compliance with
the Citys obligations under the Local Government Pay Equity Act (M.S. 471.991 to 471.999).
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 7th
day of February, 2017.
_____________________________
Mayor of the City of Shakopee
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
Compliance Report
Jurisdiction: Shakopee Report Year: 2017

129 Holmes Street South Case: 2 - 2016 Data Final (Shared (Jur and MMB))
Shakopee MN 55379
Contact: Jennifer Gabbard Phone: (952) 233-9312 E-Mail: JGabbard@ShakopeeMN.gov
The statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional service pay test results are shown below. Part I is general information
from your pay equity report data. Parts II, III and IV give you the test results.
For more detail on each test, refer to the Guide to Pay Equity Compliance and Computer Reports.
I. GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION
Male Female Balanced All Job

Classes Classes Classes Classes
# Job Classes 38 23 4 65
# Employees 105 34 22 161
Avg. Max Monthly

6,177.50 5,652.65 5,915.30
Pay per employee
II. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST
A. Underpayment Ratio = 80.70 *

Male Female
Classes Classes
a. # At or above Predicted Pay 26 14
b. # Below Predicted Pay 12 9
c. TOTAL 38 23
d. % Below Predicted Pay 31.58 39.13

(b divided by c = d)
*(Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female classes below predicted pay.)
B. T-test Results
Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 137 Value of T = -3.309
a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs = $43
b. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs = $269
III. SALARY RANGE TEST = 106.11 (Result is A divided by B)
A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = 5.03
B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs = 4.74
IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST = 0.00 (Result is B divided by A)
A. % of male classes receiving ESP 0.00 *

B. % of female classes receiving ESP 0.00
*(If 20% or less, test result will be 0.00)

Shakopee
Job Class Data Entry Verification List LGID: 1043
Case: 2016 Data Final
Job Class Nbr Nbr Class Jobs Min Mo Max Mo Yrs to Max Yrs of Exceptional
Nbr Title Males Females Type Points Salary Salary Salary Service Service Pay
58 Service Desk Attendant 4 4 B 80 $1,883.00 $2,356.00 4.00 0.00
2 Custodian 1 0 M 85 $2,977.00 $3,721.00 4.00 0.00
57 Building Supervisor 1 1 B 90 $2,062.00 $2,571.00 4.00 0.00
59 Arena Supervisor 8 0 M 90 $1,941.00 $2,426.00 4.00 0.00
1 Receptionist - City Hall 0 2 F 100 $2,978.00 $3,723.00 4.00 0.00
60 Receptionist - Police 0 1 F 105 $2,978.00 $3,723.00 4.00 0.00
4 Facilities Maintenance Worker2 0 M 110 $3,276.00 $4,095.00 4.00 0.00
7 Police Records Technician 0 3 F 110 $3,604.00 $4,505.00 4.00 0.00
5 Office Assistant - Fire Dept 0 1 F 115 $3,604.00 $4,505.00 4.00 0.00
3 Community Service Officer 1 0 M 140 $3,604.00 $4,505.00 4.00 0.00
9 Accounting Clerk 0 1 F 150 $3,964.00 $4,955.00 4.00 0.00
13 Administrative Assistant 0 9 F 155 $3,964.00 $4,955.00 4.00 0.00
8 Maintenance Operator 16 0 M 160 $3,868.00 $4,835.00 4.00 0.00
52 Police Evidence Technician 0 1 F 165 $3,964.00 $4,955.00 4.00 0.00
55 Police Records Specialist 0 1 F 170 $3,646.00 $4,558.00 4.00 0.00
10 Lead Maintenance Operator 1 0 M 190 $5,294.00 $5,294.00 0.00 0.00
6 Technology Support Assistant 0 1 F 195 $4,360.00 $5,450.00 5.00 0.00
24 Engineering Technician 1 0 M 195 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
62 Building Maintenance Manager1 0 M 200 $4,360.00 $5,450.00 5.00 0.00
53 Crime Prevention Specialist 0 1 F 205 $4,360.00 $5,450.00 5.00 0.00
16 Mechanic 2 0 M 215 $4,123.00 $5,154.00 4.00 0.00
15 Victim and Community Service0C 1 F 220 $4,360.00 $5,450.00 5.00 0.00
20 Human Resources Specialist 0 1 F 220 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
22 GIS Specialist 1 0 M 220 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
11 Lead Mechanic 1 0 M 225 $5,613.00 $5,613.00 0.00 0.00
25 Foreman 2 0 M 225 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
14 Grants and Special Projects 0 1 F 230 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
23 Planner 1 0 M 240 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
51 Payroll & Benefits Specialist 0 1 F 240 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
48 Natural Resources Technician1 0 M 245 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
54 Firefighter 4 0 M 255 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
12 Project Coordinator 1 0 M 260 $5,710.00 $7,131.00 5.00 0.00
19 Communications Coordinator 0 1 F 260 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
18 IT Specialist 2 0 M 270 $4,898.00 $6,122.00 5.00 0.00
28 Building Inspector 2 0 M 275 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
31 Police Officer 29 6 M 280 $4,803.00 $6,405.00 4.00 0.00
61 Maintenance Supervisor - PW 2 0 M 283 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
56 Sr Public Works Technician 1 0 M 295 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
26 Senior Engineering Technician1 0 M 300 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
27 Fire Inspector 1 0 M 308 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
29 Maintenance Supervisor - Facil1 0 M 318 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
65 Permit Coordinator 0 1 F 318 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
35 Project Engineer 1 0 M 325 $5,710.00 $7,131.00 5.00 0.00
33 Senior Planner 2 0 M 340 $5,225.00 $6,526.00 5.00 0.00
21 Police Records Supervisor 0 1 F 343 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
30 Recreation Supervisor 3 2 B 350 $5,285.00 $6,606.00 5.00 0.00
17 City Clerk 0 1 F 400 $5,710.00 $7,131.00 5.00 0.00
36 Building Official 1 0 M 413 $6,574.00 $8,217.00 5.00 0.00
49 Accounting Manager 0 1 F 413 $5,710.00 $7,131.00 5.00 0.00
38 Public Works Superintendent 1 0 M 430 $6,574.00 $8,217.00 5.00 0.00
32 IT Coordinator 0 1 F 433 $5,710.00 $7,131.00 5.00 0.00
50 Econ Dev Coordinator 0 1 F 450 $6,574.00 $8,217.00 5.00 0.00
34 Police Sergeant 5 2 B 480 $7,010.00 $7,788.00 2.00 0.00
39 Assistant City Engineer 1 0 M 480 $6,574.00 $8,217.00 5.00 0.00
40 Police Captain 2 0 M 555 $7,593.00 $9,492.00 6.00 0.00
63 Humsn Resources Manager 0 1 F 585 $7,593.00 $9,492.00 6.00 0.00
64 IT Director 1 0 M 595 $7,593.00 $9,492.00 6.00 0.00
41 Parks and Recreation Director0 1 F 605 $8,242.00 $10,302.00 6.00 0.00
1
Shakopee
Job Class Data Entry Verification List LGID: 1043
Case: 2016 Data Final
Job Class Nbr Nbr Class Jobs Min Mo Max Mo Yrs to Max Yrs of Exceptional
Nbr Title Males Females Type Points Salary Salary Salary Service Service Pay
47 Fire Chief 1 0 M 640 $8,242.00 $10,302.00 6.00 0.00
44 PW Director City Engineer 1 0 M 685 $8,242.00 $10,302.00 6.00 0.00
42 Finance Director 1 0 M 705 $8,976.00 $11,220.00 6.00 0.00
43 Planning and Development Direc
1 0 M 705 $8,976.00 $11,220.00 6.00 0.00
37 Assistant City Administrator 1 0 M 720 $8,976.00 $11,220.00 6.00 0.00
45 Chief of Police 1 0 M 770 $8,976.00 $11,220.00 6.00 0.00
46 City Administrator 1 0 M 850 $12,377.00 $12,377.00 0.00 0.00
Job Number Count: 65
2
Predicted Pay Report for Shakopee 2/2/2017
Case : 2016 Data Final
14000
12000
10000
Salary
8000
6000
4000
2000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Points
Male Jobs Female Jobs Balanced Jobs Predicted Pay

Line Continuation (Min) Line Continuation (Max)
Page 1 of 3
Job Job Title Nbr Nbr Total Job Job Max Mo Predicted Pay
Nbr Males Females Nbr Type Points Salary Pay Difference
58 Service Desk Attendant 4 4 8 Balanced 80 $2,356.00 $2,671.34 ($315.34)

2 Custodian 1 0 1 Male 85 $3,721.00 $2,792.99 $928.01
57 Building Supervisor 1 1 2 Balanced 90 $2,571.00 $2,915.59 ($344.59)
59 Arena Supervisor 8 0 8 Male 90 $2,426.00 $2,915.59 ($489.59)
1 Receptionist - City Hall 0 2 2 Female 100 $3,723.00 $3,160.77 $562.23
60 Receptionist - Police 0 1 1 Female 105 $3,723.00 $3,283.36 $439.64
4 Facilities Maintenance Worker 2 0 2 Male 110 $4,095.00 $3,405.95 $689.05
7 Police Records Technician 0 3 3 Female 110 $4,505.00 $3,405.95 $1,099.05
5 Office Assistant - Fire Dept 0 1 1 Female 115 $4,505.00 $3,528.55 $976.45
3 Community Service Officer 1 0 1 Male 140 $4,505.00 $4,140.57 $364.43
9 Accounting Clerk 0 1 1 Female 150 $4,955.00 $4,385.75 $569.25
13 Administrative Assistant 0 9 9 Female 155 $4,955.00 $4,508.34 $446.66
8 Maintenance Operator 16 0 16 Male 160 $4,835.00 $4,629.99 $205.01
52 Police Evidence Technician 0 1 1 Female 165 $4,955.00 $4,717.90 $237.10
55 Police Records Specialist 0 1 1 Female 170 $4,558.00 $5,003.86 ($445.86)
10 Lead Maintenance Operator 1 0 1 Male 190 $5,294.00 $5,310.79 ($16.79)
6 Technology Support Assistant 0 1 1 Female 195 $5,450.00 $5,366.53 $83.47
24 Engineering Technician 1 0 1 Male 195 $6,122.00 $5,366.53 $755.47
62 Building Maintenance Manager 1 0 1 Male 200 $5,450.00 $5,442.62 $7.38
53 Crime Prevention Specialist 0 1 1 Female 205 $5,450.00 $5,469.72 ($19.72)
16 Mechanic 2 0 2 Male 215 $5,154.00 $5,602.16 ($448.16)
15 Victim and Community Service C 0 1 1 Female 220 $5,450.00 $5,670.51 ($220.51)
20 Human Resources Specialist 0 1 1 Female 220 $6,122.00 $5,670.51 $451.49
22 GIS Specialist 1 0 1 Male 220 $6,122.00 $5,670.51 $451.49
11 Lead Mechanic 1 0 1 Male 225 $5,613.00 $5,734.90 ($121.90)
25 Foreman 2 0 2 Male 225 $6,122.00 $5,734.90 $387.10
14 Grants and Special Projects 0 1 1 Female 230 $6,122.00 $5,799.93 $322.07
23 Planner 1 0 1 Male 240 $6,122.00 $6,010.05 $111.95
51 Payroll & Benefits Specialist 0 1 1 Female 240 $6,122.00 $6,010.05 $111.95
48 Natural Resources Technician 1 0 1 Male 245 $6,122.00 $6,064.61 $57.39
54 Firefighter 4 0 4 Male 255 $6,122.00 $6,166.42 ($44.42)
12 Project Coordinator 1 0 1 Male 260 $7,131.00 $6,218.96 $912.04
19 Communications Coordinator 0 1 1 Female 260 $6,606.00 $6,218.96 $387.04
18 IT Specialist 2 0 2 Male 270 $6,122.00 $6,314.53 ($192.53)
28 Building Inspector 2 0 2 Male 275 $6,606.00 $6,351.44 $254.56
Page 2 of 3
Job Job Title Nbr Nbr Total Job Job Max Mo Predicted Pay
Nbr Males Females Nbr Type Points Salary Pay Difference
31 Police Officer 29 6 35 Male 280 $6,405.00 $6,400.46 $4.54

61 Maintenance Supervisor - PW 2 0 2 Male 283 $6,606.00 $6,428.06 $177.94
56 Sr Public Works Technician 1 0 1 Male 295 $6,606.00 $6,512.45 $93.55
26 Senior Engineering Technician 1 0 1 Male 300 $6,606.00 $6,548.12 $57.88
27 Fire Inspector 1 0 1 Male 308 $6,606.00 $6,584.26 $21.74
29 Maintenance Supervisor - Facil 1 0 1 Male 318 $6,606.00 $6,638.63 ($32.63)
65 Permit Coordinator 0 1 1 Female 318 $6,606.00 $6,638.63 ($32.63)
35 Project Engineer 1 0 1 Male 325 $7,131.00 $6,670.42 $460.58
33 Senior Planner 2 0 2 Male 340 $6,526.00 $7,030.49 ($504.49)
21 Police Records Supervisor 0 1 1 Female 343 $6,606.00 $7,061.88 ($455.88)
30 Recreation Supervisor 3 2 5 Balanced 350 $6,606.00 $7,127.18 ($521.18)
17 City Clerk 0 1 1 Female 400 $7,131.00 $7,628.03 ($497.03)
36 Building Official 1 0 1 Male 413 $8,217.00 $7,772.27 $444.73
49 Accounting Manager 0 1 1 Female 413 $7,131.00 $7,772.27 ($641.27)
38 Public Works Superintendent 1 0 1 Male 430 $8,217.00 $8,030.26 $186.74
32 IT Coordinator 0 1 1 Female 433 $7,131.00 $8,062.97 ($931.97)
50 Econ Dev Coordinator 0 1 1 Female 450 $8,217.00 $8,170.17 $46.83
34 Police Sergeant 5 2 7 Balanced 480 $7,788.00 $8,511.78 ($723.78)
39 Assistant City Engineer 1 0 1 Male 480 $8,217.00 $8,511.78 ($294.78)
40 Police Captain 2 0 2 Male 555 $9,492.00 $9,398.95 $93.05
63 Humsn Resources Manager 0 1 1 Female 585 $9,492.00 $9,614.31 ($122.31)
64 IT Director 1 0 1 Male 595 $9,492.00 $9,732.48 ($240.48)
41 Parks and Recreation Director 0 1 1 Female 605 $10,302.00 $9,850.65 $451.35
47 Fire Chief 1 0 1 Male 640 $10,302.00 $10,254.20 $47.80
44 PW Director City Engineer 1 0 1 Male 685 $10,302.00 $10,696.97 ($394.97)
42 Finance Director 1 0 1 Male 705 $11,220.00 $10,902.50 $317.50
43 Planning and Development Direc 1 0 1 Male 705 $11,220.00 $10,902.50 $317.50
37 Assistant City Administrator 1 0 1 Male 720 $11,220.00 $11,052.05 $167.95
45 Chief of Police 1 0 1 Male 770 $11,220.00 $11,550.16 ($330.16)
46 City Administrator 1 0 1 Male 850 $12,377.00 $12,346.99 $30.01
Job Number Count: 65
Page 3 of 3
B.2.

MEMO
FROM: Jennifer Gabbard

TO: Mayor and City Council
Subject:
Contract for Keystone Compensation Group, LLC.
The Council is asked to authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into the attached contract for
Keystone Compensation Group, LLC.'s services.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approving the proposed contract and resolution.
Discussion:
The City of Shakopee was required to submit a Pay Equity Report to the State of Minnesota for 2016.
This report identified some challenges with our current master compensation plan and job
classification system. To remain in compliance with Pay Equity, we need to review these systems.
Keystone Compensation Group LLC., provided the best proposal to complete this review.
Budget Impact:
There is no additional budgetary impact, as this is currently in Personnel's budget for 2017.
ATTACHMENTS:
Keystone Compensation Group Proposal

Keystone Factsheet
Resolution 7829 - Keystone Compensation Group Proposal
Proposal
Compensation Program Review

For City of Shakopee, Minnesota
12/20/2016
Prepared by:
Keystone Compensation Group LLC

3316 Ensign Ave N
Minneapolis MN 55427
Telephone: 612-810-3522
E-Mail: Sabboud@keystonecomp.net
Web: www.keystonecomp.net
December 20, 2016 Compensation Program Review for Shakopee
Table of Contents
Topic Page #
Background and Objectives ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Project Summary and Deliverables ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Framework for Conducting Compensation Program Review -------------------------------------- 4
Steps for Completing This Study ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
Project Team and Related Experience ------------------------------------------------------------------ 8
Estimated Financial Budget and Preliminary Timeline ---------------------------------------------- 9
Proposal Approval ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10
Biographies of Project Team ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11
Keystone Compensation Group LLC Page 2

Confidential
Background and Objectives

City of Shakopee (City) requested a proposal from Keystone Compensation Group LLC for providing
compensation consulting services. These services include evaluating City jobs, conducting a
competitive market analysis, and preparing recommendations for updating the Citys salary ranges.
The City has about 150 full-time and part-time employees in approximately 60 job classifications.
About 52 of these jobs are non-union classifications and these are the primary focus of this study.
Remaining jobs included in this study would be decided during the project initial meeting. The City
uses a step pay program with varying number of steps, ranges spread, and years to maximum. No
documentation is available on the current job evaluation system. The current compensation
program was reviewed in 2013.
This proposal outlines our understanding of the scope of this study, steps we would take to meet its
objectives, approximate timeline, and an estimate of the financial budget to complete the work.
Project Summary and Deliverables

1. Conduct a meeting with City leadership to review and evaluate the current compensation
program and explore alternatives, discuss compensation strategy, and set the overall plan
for the project. Consultant would also confirm the peer group of ten cities currently being
used to benchmark City jobs.
2. Evaluate City jobs using the Keystone Job Leveling System (fact sheet provided).
3. Benchmark City jobs using the League of Minnesota Cities Survey.
4. Conduct competitive market analyses and comparisons for City jobs.
5. Calibrate the current wage structure and align it with the market.
6. Perform statistical analyses and create scatterplots to illustrate the relationship between
City pay level, market, and program internal equity.
7. Prepare recommendations for revising the current wage structure based on internal job
evaluation results and market analysis.
8. Work with City staff to prepare a cost estimate for the impact of the recommended wage
structure on total payroll budget and individual employees pay.
9. Prepare a summary to outline study processes and analysis and their implications on Citys
compensation program.
10. Throughout the project create opportunities for City leadership to be involved as deemed
necessary by the project team. The goal is to inform and build credibility in the program
review process and study outcomes.

Confidential
Fr amework for Conducting Compensation Program Review for The City of Shakopee
Leadership Discussion
of Compensation Collect Job Descriptions
Evaluate Jobs
Strategy and Future and City EE Data
State
Benchmark Jobs & Review Survey Data and Statistical Analysis of

Collect Market Build Compensation Market & City Data
Data Database
Prepare Pay Calibrate Wage Determine Financial

Comparisons and Structure and Job Budget Impact of New
Confirm Internal Equity Levels Ranges
Develop Prepare Final

Review Results
Recommendations Project with City
Summary
4|Page
December 20, 2016 Compensation Program Review
Steps for Completing This Study

The lead consultant typically starts the project with an initial planning meeting with the City Project
Team and other stakeholders as appropriate. The purpose of this meeting would be for the City
team and the consultant to exchange the necessary information related to this project, discuss the
overall process, and approve project timeline. Keystone proposes the following steps for this study:
1. Initial planning meeting with leadership

a. Review current pay practices and confirm deliverables. This includes gathering current
compensation program information and outline important areas to be addressed.
b. Discuss Citys compensation strategy. This includes discussing the market for talent
(current peer group cities), where the City would like to stack its pay program relative
to the market, program design, and compensation administration guidelines.
c. Confirm pay structure design to align with the stated compensation strategy.
d. Discuss process for collecting market data, Citys internal data, and potential other City
staff involvement in program interview.
2. Collecting and confirming job descriptions
a. In our call with the City HR Manager and based on the sample of jobs we reviewed, job
descriptions are currently up-to-date. We would confirm that job descriptions are
available for all jobs and employees included in the study.
3. Evaluate City jobs using the Keystone Job Leveling System
a. Keystone Job Leveling System would be used to evaluate City jobs. A factsheet about the
system is provided to explain the compensable factors used in the evaluation.
b. As a background, Keystone Consultants have extensive experience with point-factor job
evaluation systems and generally recommend such system if the current job evaluation
process is not working well. Dr. Abboud has been involved in multiple revisions of point
factor systems since 1990. This system does not require proprietary computer software
and uses Excel program for job scoring and record keeping. City would receive a system
manual as part of this project.
c. Evaluate around 60 jobs and review the results with the City project team. This step
typically requires multiple revisions and includes input from managers in order to
reduce requests for job reviews after program rollout. In our experience, this happens
when managers are not involved in the calibration of their department jobs.
d. The final evaluations would be used in combination with market data to assign jobs to
grades and to update the Citys wage structure.
e. Keystone would provide City with a job review request form to be used for future job re-
evaluation requests when jobs change significantly.

Confidential
4. Conduct statistical analysis for the current pay program
a. Review historical analysis and current individual employees compensation and grades.
b. Conduct appropriate statistical analysis and prepare scatterplots to help understand
patterns and trends as well as any existing internal equity issues.
c. Summarize findings and develop a possible course of action to correct issues.
d. Share results of these analyses with the project team/management as needed.
5. Conduct market pricing for City benchmark jobs
a. Use job descriptions and reporting relationships to match City jobs to the League of
Minnesota Cities Compensation survey benchmark jobs.
b. Collect base pay data from the public sector survey (LMNC). Statistics we collect are
actual pay and salary range information.
c. Scrub survey data to make sure that matches by peer group cities are valid. We may call
some participants to verify some rates, if necessary.
d. If no solid benchmark match for a job is available, the job would be slotted in the grade
structure using its job evaluation points and internal comparisons with other jobs
within the City.
e. Review market analysis with City team to ensure understanding of the results and their
implications.
6. Prepare comparisons with the market and calibrate salary ranges
a. Use market data and job evaluation points to evaluate the current ranges and compare
them with the market.
b. Prepare scatterplots and trend lines for the new ranges and actual salaries to illustrate
Citys pay position relative to the market. This step also helps identify any anomalies or
potential issues with internal equity going forward (State Pay Equity Act).
c. Use market pricing data and general trend surveys to recommend 2017 grade ranges.
d. Review outcomes with City team before moving to next step.
7. Work with City staff to conduct budget impact analysis for the proposed ranges
a. City prepares employee roster and compensation data using a template provided by
Keystone.
b. Evaluate wages for employees relative to market and the new ranges.
c. Create an overall summary of the budget impact for the recommended ranges.
d. Determine salary actions needed and provide recommendations.
e. This step is typically completed in collaboration with City staff.

Confidential
8. Opportunity for stakeholders involvement
The success of this project will depend on making sure that key stakeholders are informed
or involved as necessary. This enhances the trust in the final outcomes and helps with open
communications and transparency. Meetings with the City Manager, HR Manager, and
Department Heads may be held -if necessary- to inform them about the process, describe
how the program works, and to receive feedback (budget is provided for one optional
onsite meeting).
9. Prepare the final summary
Consultant would prepare a summary that includes methodology, benchmark analysis

results, specific observations, and recommendations. All information would be provided to
City electronically. City would also receive a copy of the Keystone Job Leveling System
with its final job evaluation points and grade assignment to maintain system internally.
10. Ongoing program support
We approach this study as being your business partner invested in the success of this
program. Our goal is to ensure knowledge transfer from consultant to City staff and to help
the City sustain the program internally going forward. We would be available to support
the City after project completion and to answer questions. Simple and short inquiries are
answered at no additional cost, while more substantial work would be quoted on a project
basis.

Confidential
Project Team and Related Experience

This project would be led by Dr. Saado Y. Abboud who would be the first contact for the City. Stefan
Peterson, a Sr. Consultant with Keystone, assists with employee interviews and provides
benchmarking and analytical support to this project.
Among the specific experience that Saado has related to public sector compensation and this study:
1. Currently managing a compensation survey with 14 major counties and large cities in
Minnesota covering over 160 jobs. Counties and cities like Hennepin County, Ramsey,
Dakota, Anoka, St. Louis County, Olmsted, Stearns, Washington, Sherburne, Carver, Scott,
City of Rochester, City of Bloomington, and other agencies participate in this annual market
study.
2. Had managed the annual market survey for Minnesota metro cities and counties for over 12
years (Stanton Group Metro Survey). This survey is currently part of the League of MN
Cities Survey.
3. Extensive experience with developing and implementing compensation programs in various
industries including government, non-profit, and private sectors.
4. Has significant experience working with several counties and cities. Among our client
Counties and Cities: Scott, Dakota, Anoka, City of St. Louis Park, City of Faribault, City of
Chanhassen, City of Rochester, City of Hutchinson, City of Maplewood, City of Apple Valley,
Carlton County, McLeod County, and Crow Wing County among others.
5. Saado also co-authored a ground-braking article in the WorldatWork Journal on the
performance-based compensation program at Scott County. He received Author of the Year
Award in 2011 for writing this article.
6. Many years of experience as a corporate compensation manager, a professional consultant,
and Board leadership of several professional compensation associations.

Confidential
Estimated Financial Budget and Preliminary Timeline
Tentative
Step Description Total Comments
Timeline
Initial planning, document collection,

With HR Manager and
1 roles and responsibilities, and Weeks 1-2 $1,440
City Manager
timeline approval
Evaluate jobs using Keystone Job
Leveling System, calibration with Involves reviewing with
2 Weeks 4-9 $5,760
managers, and finalize results (55-60 department managers
Jobs)
League of MN Cities
3 Benchmarking of Jobs Weeks 10-14 $5,760
Survey (peer group)
Compensation analysis, update

Focus is on non-union
4 structure, compliance check, Weeks 15-17 $2,880
jobs
recommendations
Identify employees
5 Program costing and budget analysis Week 18 $900 outside the established
pay range
Update meetings with project team

Onsite meetings based
6 and Department Heads (one optional Varies $1,080
on key milestones
onsite presentation)
Final summary, project Electronic documents
7 Varies $1,600
documentation, administrative provided
Duration varies based
Overall Budget (lower figure $18,340-
Weeks 1- 18 on availability of City
excludes optional step) $19,420
staff
Notes
1. Keystone would invoice the City after completion of each key milestone (steps 2, 4, 7).
2. This estimate is a not-to-exceed amount and is based on our understanding of the scope of the
project.
3. Timeline is a placeholder for steps. Upon accepting proposal, consultant would prepare a
project plan with more precise timeline and desired completion date while giving each step
enough time for proper completion.
4. This budget and timeline may be adjusted if the City modified project processes.

Confidential
Why Keystone!
1. Client Relationship Focus: Our consultants emphasize strong relationships with our
clients based on mutual respect, responsiveness, and a genuine desire to help.
2. Knowledge and Expertise: With an average experience of 25 years in the field, our
consultants have acquired significant knowledge and expertise in various industries and
organizations.
3. Our Values: Integrity, excellence, and service guide our working relationship with our
clients.
4. Business Acumen: We invest significant amount of time upfront to better understand the
issues are resolving. We view compensation as a strategic investment that organizations
make in their employees. Our role is to help clients manage this investment in order to
better attract, motivate, and retain their talent and improve their business outcomes.
Proposal Approval
This proposal is prepared based on our understanding of the scope of the services
requested. Additional work outside of the scope may be priced separately upon request from
the City.
We can start this study within two-three weeks after receiving approval for this proposal.
Specific dates may be determined once the project is approved.
We are privileged to be considered for this project and look forward to the opportunity to
work with you on this important study! If you have any questions, please call Saado Abboud
at: 612.810.3522 or email him at: sabboud@keystonecomp.net .
If you approve this proposal, please sign below and return a copy of this page this
agreement to Saado Abboud at: sabboud@keystonecomp.net
City Authorized Signature:
Approved by Title Date

Confidential
Saado Y. Abboud, Ph.D.

Keystone Compensation Group, LLC
Principal Consultant
3316 Ensign Ave North
Tel: 612.810.3522
Sabboud@keystonecomp.net
www.keystonecomp.net
Saado is a founding partner of Keystone Compensation Group LLC with over twenty five years of
experience in the field of compensation. His experience involves all phases of compensation
program development, strategy, design and management. His clients include organizations in
private, public sector, and nonprofit. He consults with top executives and board of directors on
executive compensation design and management. His combined experience in managing
compensation programs within a Fortune 100 company and as a professional consultant gives him a
balanced view for solving compensation issues.
Most recently Saado served as Vice President, Compensation Practice for Stanton Group, a regional
consulting and survey research firm in Minneapolis. He worked closely with business and HR
leaders as well as Boards of Directors to develop rewards programs for executives, middle
management, and other employees. Saados compensation experience includes developing base pay,
short-term and long-term incentive programs to attract and motivate employees. He also helps his
clients with communicating reward programs.
Prior to joining Stanton Group, Saado spent several years in a senior leadership position at Best Buy
Co. with responsibilities over corporate compensation programs as well as executive compensation.
Among his other accomplishments was taking a key role in restructuring the HR function and
leading several technology initiatives to support business growth. He contributed articles and
interviews to several trade publications, including Workspan, a monthly journal for total rewards
professionals, Minnesota Bankers News and the Twin Cities Business Journal.
Early in his career, Saado taught at the college and graduate school levels, domestically and abroad.
He has a doctorate and masters degrees from the University of Minnesota in Quantitative Analysis.
He also received his MBA degree in Corporate Finance from the University of St. Thomas. Saado is a
certified compensation professional (CCP), a member of WorldatWork, and past Chairman of the
Local Network Advisory Board for WorldatWork. Saado also served for several years on as the
Chairman of the Twin Cities Compensation Network Board of Directors.

Confidential
Stefan K. Peterson, CCP

Keystone Compensation Group, LLC
Principal Consultant
3316 Ensign Ave North
Tel: 952.270.1114
Speterson@keystonecomp.net
Stefan is a Senior Compensation Consultant at Keystone Compensation Group LLC with over thirty
years of experience in the field of compensation. His experience involves managing compensation,
benefits, and human resources systems. His compensation and benefits career included
organizations in the healthcare, retail, technology, and manufacturing industries. His experience in
managing compensation and benefits programs within Fortune 100 companies and midsize
organizations uniquely qualifies him to solve diverse client challenges.
Most recently Stefan served as Sr. Director of Compensation and Benefits at Fairview Health
Services, a premier healthcare organization in Minneapolis. He had responsibility over a team
charged with the redesigning of compensation and benefits programs as well as the implementation
of new human resources and payroll systems. He also provided executive compensation consulting
services and developed HR Committee meeting materials. Stefans compensation experience
includes developing base pay, short-term, and long-term incentive programs to attract and motivate
employees.
Prior to joining Fairview Health Services, Stefan held several senior leadership positions at Nash
Finch Company, Pearson Inc., National Computer Systems, BMC Industries, Alliant Techsystems and
Honeywell Inc. In all these organizations he had broad responsibilities over base pay programs, job
evaluation, and executive compensation.
Stefan has a Masters degree from Gonzaga University in Human Resources Management and a
Bachelors degree in Political Science from University of North Dakota. He has been a faculty
member at the Metropolitan State University for over twenty years teaching compensation and
benefits classes. He is a Certified Compensation Professional (CCP) and a Senior Professional in
Human Resources (SPHR). Stefan is a member of WorldatWork and the Twin Cities Compensation
Network (TCCN). He also served on the Twin Cities Compensation Network Board of Directors.

Confidential
KeystoneTechnology
Information Job Leveling System
Solutions
A Point-Factor Job Evaluation Method
KEY ASPECTS OF THE Evaluate jobs to determine appropriate pay for a position,
SYSTEM ensure internal equity, and effectively link your overall pay
Open architecture system that program to the appropriate labor market.
relies on best practices in the
market place to assign levels to
How It Works Five Evaluation Factors
jobs based on requirements of
the job and factors that are The Keystone Job Leveling System is an These factors express how organizations choose to
found across all jobs in varying open architecture system designed to reward their people and the requirements needed to
degrees. incorporate the most widely used deliver business results.
elements of job evaluation in order to 1. Knowledge, Skills & Competence: The

STRONG LINK TO THE knowledge and skills gained through education,
establish an internal job hierarchy. This
training, and the experience required for fulfilling
MARKET system is simple to use and incorporates
the overall purpose of the job.
Once jobs are evaluated, the most widely accepted compensable
organizations are on their way factors to assign suitable levels to each 2. Level of Responsibility: The impact by the
to begin market analysis and job. These levels are then converted into individual in the job on the achieving the
develop pay programs that are points using a specialized spreadsheet. objectives of the team, department, business
externally competitive and that The spreadsheet also provides an overall function or organization.
also take internal equity into report, sorted by level, for all jobs
consideration. 3. Level of Complexity: Complexity refers to the
evaluated to ensure evaluation results
variety and diversity of the work assigned to the
are viewed as fair and credible.
job, as well as the complexity of the decisions
NO SPECIALIZED Client organizations receive the guide
made to deliver certain results.
SOFTWARE for the evaluation system as well as the
The Keystone Job Leveling spreadsheet calculator so they can 4. Contacts & Interpersonal Skills: The extent
System comes with a calculator maintain their evaluations internally. to which the work involves making contacts,
that converts the levels Once the evaluation process is communicating, negotiating, or influencing
assigned to points for each complete, a regression analysis may be decision-making with people inside and outside
factor and calculates the used to assist with creating salary ranges the organization.
overall job points accordingly. based on market data and the
5. Working Conditions: Refers to exposure to
evaluation points. The analysis enables
extreme temperature, unpleasant conditions,
For more information, please call each organization to do comparisons
exposure to injury, and health hazards in addition
us at: 612.810.3522 or with the market and evaluate the
to physical demands that are part of the regular
Totalrewards@keystonecomp.net competitiveness of their overall pay
work environment.
program. The system also facilitates the
process of assigning jobs to appropriate
grades when market data are scarce.
RESOLUTION NO. 7829
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE TO ENTER

INTO A CONTRACT WITH KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP, LLC.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,

MINNESOTA, that the City of Shakopee is authorized to enter into a contract with Keystone
Compensation Group, LLC.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Human Resources manager is authorized to sign

the contract proposal submitted by Keystone Compensation Group, LLC.
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 7th
day of February, 2017.
_____________________________
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
C.1.

MEMO
FROM: Jamie Polley

Subject:
Authorization to submit a Federal Recreational Trail Program application for trails to Memorial Park
bridge, Resolution No. 7830 (A)
Offer Resolution No. 7830, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota Authorizing the City to
submit a Federal Recreational Trail Program application for trails to the Memorial Park bridge.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the authorization of a grant application submittal for trails leading to the future
Memorial Park bridge.
Discussion:
The Memorial Park bridge was removed in 2015. The cost to replace the bridge and complete the
trails leading up to the bridge is approximately $670,000. The City received a Federal Recreation
Trail Grant in 2016 for the amount of $150,000 for the bridge structure. Further grant funding could
assist in the construction of the trails leading to the bridge.
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act provides funding from the Federal Highway
Trust Fund in acknowledgment of off-road recreation fuel use. Possible projects include construction
of trails on municipal lands where a 20 year easement for the project can be obtained. Grant
applications are due by February 28, 2017.
Budget Impact:
The City currently has $150,000 budgeted in the Park Asset Fund and has the 2016 Federal Trail
Program grant in the amount of $150,000. The grant is a 75/25 "cash match" reimbursement program.
Meaning the city would be reimbursed 75% of the costs of the project up to the grant amount
awarded. The maximum grant award is $150,000. If the City were awarded further grant dollars the
additional funding needed to pay for the project would be reduced.
Staff continues to work with other entities to determine the significance of the bridge and trial
connections and to obtain additional funding.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 7830

RESOLUTION NO. 7830
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO SUBMIT A FEDERAL RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROGRAM
APPLICATION FOR TRAILS TO THE MEMORIAL PARK BRIDGE
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the grant application made to the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources for the Federal Recreational Trail Program. The application is to
construct a trail leading to the north and south sides of a pedestrian bridge completing a gap in the
MN Valley State Trail. The trail system and bridge are located within 136.9 acres of Memorial Park,
and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes the twenty-five (25) percent match requirement
for the Federal Recreational Trail Program, and has secured the matching funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that if the City of Shakopee is awarded a grant by the Minnesota
Department of Natural resources, the City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award, and may enter
into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above referenced project. The City of Shakopee
will comply with all applicable laws, environmental requirements and regulations as stated in the grant
agreement, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Shakopee names the fiscal agent of
the City of Shakopee for this project as: Darin Nelson
Finance Director
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes St S.
Shakopee, MN 55379
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Shakopee hereby assures the trails to the Memorial
Park Bridge will be open, available for use and maintained for a period of no less than 20 years.
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this
7th Day of February, 2017.
______________________________
William Mars
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
C.2.

MEMO
FROM: Jamie Polley

Subject:
Authorization to Contract with WSB & Associates, Inc. for the Design, Specifications and
Construction Services for the Phase 2 Development of Quarry Lake Park (A, B)
Authorize the appropriate staff to enter into an agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc. in the amount
not to exceed $63,800.00 to prepare and provide the final design, specifications, bidding documents,
bidding procedures and construction administration services for the phase 2 development of Quarry
Lake Park.
Recommendation:
The completion of phase 2 of Quarry Lake Park is a designated project in the 2017 Park Reserve
plan. Staff is recommending the completion of the design and construction documents at this time.
With the design and construction documents complete and ready, the project can be bid when the
appropriate funding is available in the Park Reserve Fund.
Discussion:
The development of Quarry Lake Park has been separated into three phases due to the complexity and
funding available for the 111 acre park. Phase 1 was completed in 2016 with minor finishes to take
place in 2017. Phase 1 includes the development and site work of the NW corner of the park. The
area includes green space, gazebo, trail, fishing pier, parking lot and site utilities. Phase 1 also
included the installation of the pedestrian bridge on the west side of the park.
Phase 2 of the project includes the construction of two miles of paved trails around the lake and a one
mile non paved trail on Xcel Energy's property on the south side of the park. Phase 3 is the
construction of the large community building.
Budget Impact:
The development of Quarry Lake Park is funded from the Park Reserve Fund. The current
approximate balance in the fund is $655,015.80 with approximately $90,000 allocated for the final
payment of Phase 1. The City has also received a Federal Recreational Trail grant in the amount of
$150,000 for the construction of the trails within Quarry Lake Park.
ATTACHMENTS:
Phase 2 concept plan

Phase 1 = NW
Corner
Phase 2 = Trails
around lake and on
Xcel property
Phase 2 = Trails
around lake and on
Xcel property
C.3.

MEMO
FROM: Jamie Polley

Subject:
Authorization to Submit a Federal Recreational Trail Program Application for the Memorial Park
Bridge, Resolution No. 7831 (A)
Offer Resolution No. 7831, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota Authorizing the City to
submit a Federal Recreational Trail Program Application for the Memorial Park Bridge.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the submittal of a Federal Recreational Trail Program application for the Memorial
Park bridge to increase the chances of obtaining additional funding for the replacement of the bridge.
Discussion:
The replacement of the Memorial Park bridge is a project that staff has been working on for the past
two years. The cost to replace the bridge is significant. The main funding sources for the project
include the Park Asset Fund and grant funding.
The City has received a Federal Recreational Trail grant for the bridge however the cost of the bridge
makes it eligible for multiple grants. Multiple Federal Recreation Trail grants can be awarded for the
same project. In addition, staff continues to work with other local entities on other funding
options. The bridge installation is significant in closing the gap of the MN Valley State Trail.
The maximum award of the grant is $150,000.00. A 25% cash or in-kind match is required. Funding of
the Federal Recreational Trail Program comes from the Federal Highway Trust Fund to acknowledge
off-road recreational trail use.
The grant application is due by February 28, 2017. Grants will be announced in June of 2017.
Budget Impact:
The design and installation of the bridge and connecting trails is estimated at $670,000.00. The City
currently has $150,000 allocated in the 2017 Park Asset Fund and a $150,000 2016 Federal
Recreational Trails grant. The SMSC has also donated $10,000 and Scott County may contribute
$50,000 from the 101 trail project, all totaling $360,000. If the City is awarded the grant of $150,000,
the City Council will decide if the grant is accepted and additional funding from another source or
other partners would be needed.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 7831

RESOLUTION NO. 7831
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO SUBMIT A FEDERAL RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROGRAM
APPLICATION FOR THE MEMORIAL PARK BRIDGE
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee supports the grant application made to the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources for the Federal Recreational Trail Program. The application is to
construct a pedestrian bridge completing a gap in the MN Valley State Trail. The trail system and
bridge are located within 136.9 acres of Memorial Park, and
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee recognizes the twenty-five (25) percent match requirement
for the Federal Recreational Trail Program, and has secured the matching funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that if the City of Shakopee is awarded a grant by the Minnesota
Department of Natural resources, the City of Shakopee agrees to accept the grant award, and may enter
into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above referenced project. The City of Shakopee
will comply with all applicable laws, environmental requirements and regulations as stated in the grant
agreement, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Shakopee names the fiscal agent of
the City of Shakopee for this project as: Darin Nelson
Finance Director
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes St S.
Shakopee, MN 55379
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Shakopee hereby assures the Memorial Park Bridge
will be open, available for use and maintained for a period of no less than 20 years.
Adopted in adjourned regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this
7th Day of February, 2017.
______________________________
William Mars
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
D.1.

MEMO
FROM: Darin Nelson, Finance Director

Subject:
*City Bill List (F)
Move to approve the bills and electronic funds transfers in the amount $5,406,906.06, payroll
transfers in the amount of $497,016.87 for a total of $5,903,922.93.
Recommendation:
Approval
Discussion:
Attached is the most recent monthly Financial Report for the General fund. These reports reflect the
expenditures as recorded for 2016 & 2017 activity. The following transactions are notable for this
reporting cycle:
Draw 12 was requested by CPMI for various contractors working on the City Hall project. Total
amount requested, $645,324.34.
Several dues are being paid to Scott County: SCALE Facility Member Contribution for 2017 is
split between the Fire and Police departments, $63,376.00. SCALE Unified Economic
Development Annual Fee, $20,000.00. Tri-County Tactical Team Contribution, $10,000.00.
Annual Fiber Optics, $5,319.26. Public Safety Information System (PSIS) Contribution,
$16,400.38.
RJM Construction payment voucher 11 for the Community Center Renovation & Ice Arena
Construction is for $1,283,642.02.
Debt Service payments were made in the amount of $2,152,143.13.
Included in the check list are various refunds, returns, and pass throughs.
Budget Impact:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
2016 Monthly Financial Report

2017 Monthly Financial Report
Bill List Transfer
Council Check Register
Council Check Summary
&,7<2)6+$.23((
0RQWKO\)LQDQFLDO5HSRUW

'LYLVLRQ <7' 'HFHPEHU <7' %XGJHW%DODQFH 3HUFHQW8VHG <7' <7' 3HUFHQW8VHG
%XGJHW $FWXDO $FWXDO %XGJHW $FWXDO
*(1(5$/)81'
0$<25 &281&,/
$'0,1,675$7,21
&,7<&/(5.
),1$1&(
&20081,7<'(9(/230(17
)$&,/,7,(6
32/,&('(3$570(17
),5(
,163(&7,21%/'*3/0%*+7*
(1*,1((5,1*
675((70$,17(1$1&(
)/((7
3$5.0$,17(1$1&(
1$785$/5(6285&(6
5(&5($7,21
81$//2&$7('
727$/
2/2/2017 3:30:11 PM Page 1 of 1

&,7<2)6+$.23((
0RQWKO\)LQDQFLDO5HSRUW

'LYLVLRQ <7' )HEUXDU\ <7' %XGJHW%DODQFH 3HUFHQW8VHG <7' <7' 3HUFHQW8VHG
%XGJHW $FWXDO $FWXDO %XGJHW $FWXDO
*(1(5$/)81'
1$
0$<25 &281&,/
$'0,1,675$7,21
&,7<&/(5.
),1$1&(
&20081,7<'(9(/230(17
)$&,/,7,(6
32/,&('(3$570(17
),5(
,163(&7,21%/'*3/0%*+7*
(1*,1((5,1*
675((70$,17(1$1&(
)/((7
3$5.0$,17(1$1&(
1$785$/5(6285&(6
5(&5($7,21
81$//2&$7('
727$/
2/2/2017 3:32:57 PM Page 1 of 1

FundstransferredelectronicallyJanuary18,2017toFebruary7,2017
PAYROLL $ 273,878.49
FIT/FICA $ 87,617.17
STATEINCOMETAX $ 17,913.24
PERA $ 83,645.58
HEALTHCARESAVINGS $ 6,691.70
HEALTHSAVINGSACCT $6,402.45
NATIONWIDEDEFCOMP $ 11,382.10
ICMADEFERREDCOMP $ 2,017.54
MSRS $ 2,822.54
FSA $ 4,646.06
MNWAGELEVY $
Total $ 497,016.87
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\

&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
&$56213$752/72:,1*
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6

&(1785</,1.

( 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
-$1

&219(17,21 9,6,7256%85($8

'(&(0%(5 /2'*,1*7$; /2'*,1*7$;

0,'67$7(625*$1,=('&5,0(,1)250$7,21

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6

3$/0(56+(,0-,0 -8/,(

5()81'6+(/7(5'$0$*('(326,7 '$0$*('(326,7 3$5.6(59,&(6

6&277&2$77251(<2)),&(

'(&(0%(5 ),1(6 )25)(,766-3$ 3$752/

6&277&275($685(5

,1 :$*(6)75(* 6:0'7)0$7&+
,1 29(57,0()7 6:0'7)0$7&+
,1 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
,1 :$*(6)75(* 6:0'7)0$7&+
,1 29(57,0()7 6:0'7)0$7&+
,1 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6

6+$.23((3(77<&$6+&,7<2)

-$18$5< :$*(63$577,0(7(03 ,&($5(1$

6+$.23((&+(9,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:0'7)0$7&+
86(7$; 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6+$.23((&+(9,1& &RQWLQXHG

6+$.23((&,7<2)

'(&(0%(5 :$*(6)75(* 6:0'7)0$7&+
'(&(0%(5 :$*(6)75(* 6:0'7)0$7&+
'(&(0%(5 29(57,0()7 6:0'7)0$7&+
'(&(0%(5 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7)0$7&+

:(//6)$5*2&25325$7(758676(59,&(6

$&&76+$.%* *2,03529 '(%76(59,&(35,1&,3$/ %*2,03%21'6
%
$&&76+$.%* *2,03529 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 %*2,03%21'6
%

%5((**(0$110$5,$1

5()81'&/$66 $'8/7$&7,9,7,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

&(17(532,17(1(5*<6(59&,(6,1&

*$6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
*$6 ,&($5(1$

&(17(532,17(1(5*<6(59&,(6,1&

*$6 322/
-$1
*$6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
-$1
*$6 3$5.%/'*60$,17
-$1
*$6 3$5.6(59,&(6
-$1
*$6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
-$1
*$6 /,%5$5<
-$1
*$6 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
-$1
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&(17(532,17(1(5*<6(59&,(6,1& &RQWLQXHG
*$6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
-$1
*$6 &,7<+$//
-$1
*$6 ,&($5(1$
-$1

&20&$67

(48,30(175(17 32/,&(
-$1

'-.5$1=&2,1&

(6&52:5()81'2/'&$55,$* 6+ &2&+$5*(3$<$%/( (6&52:)81'

.(//(<)8(/6,1&

*$62/,1( *(1(5$/)81'
',(6(/ *(1(5$/)81'

01'(372)&200(5&(

0$66,( (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 (6&52:)81'

09(&

-$1 (/(&75,& 675((70$,17

2386'(6,*1%/8,/'//&

(6&52:5()81',1129$7,21 6+ &2&+$5*(3$<$%/( (6&52:)81'
(6&52:5()81',1129$7,21 6+ (526,21&21752/3$<$%/( (6&52:)81'

5(38%/,&6(59,&(6

5()86( 675((7
6$35(3$<0(17 '(/,148(176 6$35(3$< 5()86(&(57,),&$7,21

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

5(38%/,&6(59,&(6 &RQWLQXHG
'(/,145(& '(/,148(176 63(&,$/$66(660(1735,1&,3$/ 5()86(&(57,),&$7,21

6&277&275($685(5

,1 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7)0$7&+
7,5(6$1'6(59,&('2'*($9(1* 6&3: (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200

6(:(535(3$<0(176 6(:(5&+$5*(6 6$1,7$5<6(:(5%,//6&(57,),('
'(/,148(176
6(:(55(&(,9(' &(57,),('813$,')((667250 6$1,7$5<6(:(587,/,7<)81'
'(/,148(176
6725035(3$<0(176 67250&+$5*(6 67250'5$,1$*(%,//6&(57,),('
'(/,148(176
672505(&(,9(' &(57,),('813$,')((667250 685)$&(:$7(5)81'
'(/,148(176

6+,027$352-(&70$1$*(0(17

(6&52:5()81'6+$&.%(55< 6+ &2&+$5*(3$<$%/( (6&52:)81'
(6&52:5()81'6+$&.%(55< 6+ 5(6,'/$1'6&$3(3$<$%/( (6&52:)81'
(6&52:5()81'6+$&.%(55< 6+ (526,21&21752/3$<$%/( (6&52:)81'

9(5,=21:,5(/(66

7(/(3+21( $'0,1,675$7,21
7(/(3+21( &20081,&$7,216
&20387(5$&&(66 (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
&20387(5$&&(66 (1*,1((5,1*
7(/(3+21( )$&,/,7,(6
7(/(3+21( )$&,/,7,(6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
7(/(3+21( ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
&20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
7(/(3+21( 3(56211(/3$<52//
7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
7(/(3+21( 1$785$/5(6285&(6
&20387(5$&&(66 1$785$/5(6285&(6
7(/(3+21( 5(&5($7,21
7(/(3+21( 322/
7(/(3+21( 7((1&(17(5
7(/(3+21( 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
7(/(3+21( &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
7(/(3+21( &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
7(/(3+21( ,&($5(1$
7(/(3+21( 3/$11,1*
7(/(3+21( &2'((1)25&(0(17
7(/(3+21( 3$752/
7(/(3+21( 3$752/
7(/(3+21( 3$752/
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
&20387(5$&&(66 75,%$/6(59,&(6
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( )/((7
7(/(3+21( 52:0*7
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( )/((7
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 52:0*7
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( )/((7
7(/(3+21( 675((7
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
7(/(3+21( ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
&20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
7(/(3+21( ('$0$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
7(/(3+21( 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
&20387(5$&&(66 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

3$:6$1,0$/&21752/

-$18$5< 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &2'((1)25&(0(17

&$59(5&2$77251(<

62)),&(
/(1= && ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

&(17(532,17(1(5*<6(59&,(6,1&

*$6 &,7<+$//

&(1785</,1.

( 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
-$1

'8.(5($/7</3

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

'8.(5($/7</3 &RQWLQXHG
$66(660(17 0,6&(//$1(286 *(1(5$/)81'
5()81'

+(11(3,1&2$77251(<

62)),&(
9$1=$1'7 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

0$/.(5621*8110$57,1//3

&2857),/(35 ),/( *$51,6+0(17 3$<52//&/($5,1*
-$1

0$/21(:$/7

5()81'0(0%(56+,3 0(0%(56+,36 &20081,7<&(17(5

0&/(2'&2$77251(<

62)),&(
0,&.2/,&+(. 0& ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 +8 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 +8 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

0(752&281&,/(19,526(59,&(6

&855(1786(&+$5*(6 6(:(50$1$*(0(17

01&2002)),1$1&(75($6',9

:$7621 6+ ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 +8 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 +8 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
5&6&75$;/(5 5&6& ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

9$1=$1'7 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
0&0,&.2/,&+(. 0& ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
&&/(1= && ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

08/7,6(59,&(6,1&

&/($1,1*6(59,&(6 ,&($5(1$
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

08/7,6(59,&(6,1& &RQWLQXHG

5(19,//(&2817<$77251(<

62)),&(
5&6&75$;/(5 5&6& ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

6$0

6&/8%
-$18$5< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
-$18$5< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
-$18$5< )22' ,&($5(1$
-$18$5< )22' ,&($5(1$
-$18$5< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
-$18$5< 86(7$; *(1(5$/)81'

6&277&2$77251(<

62)),&(
:$7621 6+ ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

6&277&25(&25'(5

5(62/87,213& -$18$5< ),/,1*)((6 3/$11,1*
5(62/87,213& -$18$5< ),/,1*)((6 3/$11,1*

6&277&275($685(5'(387<5(*,67(5

9,1 %0: (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 32/,&(

6+$.23((38%/,&6&+22/',67

322/)((6 27+(55(17 322/

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200

)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 32/,&(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& /,%5$5<
)(%58$5< :$7(5 /,%5$5<
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 /,%5$5<
)(%58$5< 67250 /,%5$5<
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200 &RQWLQXHG
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
)(%58$5< 67250 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3/$<*5281'0$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3/$<*5281'0$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3/$<*5281'0$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3/$<*5281'0$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3/$<*5281'0$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 322/
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< 67250 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< :$7(5 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 32/,&(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200 &RQWLQXHG
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< 67250 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 758&.:$6+
)(%58$5< :$7(5 758&.:$6+
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< 67250 3$5.0$,17 *$5%$*(3,&.83
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 322/
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 322/
)(%58$5< 67250 322/
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 322/
)(%58$5< :$7(5 322/
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.6(59,&(6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.6(59,&(6
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 3$5.6(59,&(6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200 &RQWLQXHG
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< 67250 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< 67250 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 &,7<+$//
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< 67250 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& &,7<+$//
)(%58$5< :$7(5 &,7<+$//
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 &,7<+$//
)(%58$5< 67250 &,7<+$//
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< 67250 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< 67250 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& )$&,/,7,(6),5(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200 &RQWLQXHG
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 32/,&(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 32/,&(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 322/
)(%58$5< :$7(5 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 322/
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 322/
)(%58$5< 67250 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
)(%58$5< 67250 322/
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& ,&($5(1$
)(%58$5< :$7(5 ,&($5(1$
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 ,&($5(1$
)(%58$5< 67250 ,&($5(1$
)(%58$5< :$7(5 ,&($5(1$
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 322/
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 675((70$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< 67250 3$5.%/'*60$,17
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< :$7(5 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 32/,&(
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& /,)767$7,210$,17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200 &RQWLQXHG
)(%58$5< :$7(5 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
)(%58$5< 6(:(5 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
)(%58$5< (/(&75,& 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17

;&(/(1(5*<

(/(&75,& 675((70$,17

67/,1(/((:(69(1785(6//&

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

071-

66 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6,*10$,17

$03(67&21752/

%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
%8,/',1*0$,17 /,%5$5<
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
%8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//
%8,/',1*0$,17 <287+%8,/',1*
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
%8,/',1*0$,17 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,17 ,&($5(1$

$%5$.$'22'/(

3(5)250(56,16758&7256 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

$%5$06 6&+0,'7//&

$77251(< 32/,&(

$'9$1786&$3,7$/0$1$*(0(17,1&

7+475 ,17(5(67 ,19(670(1775867)81'
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

$'9$1786&$3,7$/0$1$*(0(17,1& &RQWLQXHG
5'475 ,17(5(67 ,19(670(1775867)81'

$*32:(5(17(535,6(6,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:((3,1*
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:((3,1*
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:((3,1*

$,0(/(&7521,&6,1&

),1$/ 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

$1&207(&+1,&$/&(17(5

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(

$63(1(48,30(17&2

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17

$720,&5(&<&/,1*

5()86( &,7<+$//

%(&.(5$5(1$352'8&76,1&

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

%(1-$0,1%86,1&

'(&(0%(5 75$163257$7,21 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

%(5:$/'522),1*&2,1&

/$%25 %8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

%,))6,1&

: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

%,))6,1& &RQWLQXHG
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 5()86( &,7<+$//

%2/721 0(1.,1&

(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7176 (1*,1((5,1*
(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 675((75(&21352-(&7
(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 +,//'$/('5,9(
(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7176 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 &6$+6(:(5(;7(16,21

%26(./</(

82)01673$8/ -$1 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,163(&7,21
0,/($*(

%28$9,&+,7+'$11<

'8/87+ (06&21) 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
5(,0%

%2<(5758&.6

6$9 (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17
6$9 (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17

&+,&203$1,(6

27+(55(17 &,7<+$//
27+(55(17 &,7<+$//
27+(55(17 &,7<+$//

&+2,&((/(&75,&,1&

%8,/',1*0$,17 3$5.%/'*60$,17

&,17$6),567$,' 6$)(7<

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&,17$6),567$,' 6$)(7< &RQWLQXHG
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 675((7

&,7,&$5*2 6725$*(

5, 27+(55(17 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6

&/$66&62/87,216*5283

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 3$5.(48,30(170$,17
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17

&21&5(7(&877,1* &25,1*,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( %/9'75(( :(('
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17

&30,

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &,7<+$//
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &,7<+$//

'$/&2,1&

%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 <287+%8,/',1*
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
%8,/',1*0$,17 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6

'$9,6-26+

)$// &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3$752/
78,7,21

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

',0$**,26$0$17+$ &RQWLQXHG
6&$/(('$0&21) -$1 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ('$0$1$*(0(17
0,/($*(5(,0%

'21/$5&216758&7,21&2

%8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

((/(&75,&$/6(59,&(6,1&

%8,/',1*0$,17 ,&($5(1$

(&.527+'$1

%227 81,)2506&/27+,1* )$&,/,7,(6
$//2:$1&(

(*$1%,//

%227 81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$5.
$//2:$1&(

(/(&75,&$/352'8&7,216(59,&(6,1&

%8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

(/(<*,$

(',1$ -$1 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,163(&7,21
0,/($*(5(,0%

(65,,1&

62)7:$5($118$/)((6 (1*,1((5,1*

(;(&87,9(2&($1

2)),&(6833/,(6 $'0,1,675$7,21

)$67(1$/

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

)$67(1$/ &RQWLQXHG
016.$ (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:((3,1*

)$676,*16

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

)%,1$7,21$/$&$'(0<$662&,$7(6

0(0%(5,' '8(6,' '8(6 32/,&(

0(0%(5,' '8(6,' '8(6 3$752/

),5((06&(17(56)6

35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* $'0,1,675$7,21

)/2<'727$/6(&85,7<

%8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//

)/<110,':(67/3

%8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

)30$,/,1*62/87,216,1&

5, 3267$*( 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
5, 3267$*( &20081,7<&(17(5
5, 3267$*( 322/
5, 3267$*( ,&($5(1$
5, 3267$*( 3$5.'(9(/230(17

*($5:$6+//&

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(

*,'',1*6'$9(

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

*,'',1*6'$9( &RQWLQXHG
)$// &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
78,7,21

*,(6('$55(1

'8/87+ (06&21) 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(

*23+(567$7(21(&$//,1&

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17

*5$),;6+233(,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 3$752/

*5$,1*(5,1&

%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 /,%5$5<
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &,7<+$//
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(

+$0/,1(81,9(56,7<

,'-$0,(7+(,6 635,1*,' &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 675((7

,'.(,7+5$,1(6 635,1* &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
,'

+($/7+3$571(56

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$752/
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ,&($5(1$

+(,0$1),5((48,30(17

,1 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

,'(17,6<6 &RQWLQXHG
2)),&(6833/,(6 $'0,1,675$7,21

,1129$7,9(*5$3+,&6

5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

,1129$7,9(2)),&(62/87,216//&

,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 ),1$1&(
,1 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 81$//2&$7('
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 3(56211(/3$<52//
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 $'0,1,675$7,21
,1 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 81$//2&$7('
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 3(56211(/3$<52//
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 $'0,1,675$7,21
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 81$//2&$7('
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 81$//2&$7('
,1 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 81$//2&$7('
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 ),1$1&(
6&1 2)),&(6833/,(6 ),1$1&(
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 ),5(
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&25'6
,1 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&25'6
,1 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
6&1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21

.(1'(//'2256 +$5':$5(,1&

6, %8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

.5(66&$5/$

)761(//,1*673$8/ -$1 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
0,/($*(5(,0%
-$10,6& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
5(,0%

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

.520,1*$7(55< &RQWLQXHG
-$18$5< 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ,163(&7,21

/02%,/(9,6,21,1&

,1 (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 3$752/

/$.(&28175<'225//&

%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6

/($*8(2)01&,7,(6

&21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* $'0,1,675$7,21

/($*8(2)01&,7,(6,1685$1&(75867

:25.(56&203(16$7,21 3$752/
$&&2817 %,//,1* /0&,735(0,80 :25.(56&2036(/),16,6
67$7(0(17

/2*,6

62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
&20387(56(59,&(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
&20387(56(59,&(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 3(56211(/3$<52//
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 /,&(16(6
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,163(&7,21
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,163(&7,21
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 3/$11,1*
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 (1*,1((5,1*
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

/<10$535,17,1*

35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

/<10$535,17,1* &RQWLQXHG

0$0$

&21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* $'0,1,675$7,21

0$&48((1(48,3

3 (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:((3,1*
3 (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:((3,1*

0$5&2

,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* (1*,1((5,1*
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),5(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),5(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 675((7
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3$5.
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* )/((7
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 52:0*7
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* )/((7
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* )/((7
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* )$&,/,7,(6
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),1$1&(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 32/,&(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* $'0,1,675$7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3/$11,1*
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ,163(&7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 1$785$/5(6285&(6
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* $'0,1,675$7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 5(&5($7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 322/
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ,&($5(1$
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &20081,7<&(17(5
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3$5.6(59,&(6
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 7((1&(17(5
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3$5.'(9(/230(17
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

0$5&2 &RQWLQXHG
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* $'0,1,675$7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 7(/(&20081&$7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),1$1&(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3/$11,1*
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),5(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ,163(&7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* (1*,1((5,1*
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* $'0,1,675$7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* &/(5.
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),1$1&(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3/$11,1*
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),5(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ,163(&7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* )/((7
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 5(&5($7,21
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 32/,&(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 32/,&(
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ('$0$1$*(0(17
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ('$0$1$*(0(17
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
,19 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ,1)27(&+,6)81'
,19 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
,19 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

0(752&,7,(6

'8(6 0$<25 &281&,/

0,'67$7(625*$1,=('&5,0(,1)250$7,21

'8(6 3$752/

0,':(673/$<6&$3(6,1&

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6.$7(3$5.

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

0,11($32/,6),1$1&('(37 &RQWLQXHG
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$:16+236

0,11(627$,&($5(1$0*56$661

,19 '8(6 ,&($5(1$

0,11(627$3/80%,1* +($7,1*,1&

%8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//

0,11(627$81(03/2<0(17,1685$1&(

81(03/2<0(17 3$752/
81(03/2<0(17 )/((7

01'(372)38%/,&6$)(7<

'8(6 0$,17)8(/6<67(0
0

01'(372)75$163257$7,21

3 ,03529(0(176 7+$9(5(&216758&7,21

07,',675,%87,1*,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:((3,1*

08/7,6(59,&(6,1&

&/($1,1*6(59,&(6 /,%5$5<
&/($1,1*6(59,&(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
&/($1,1*6(59,&(6 ,&($5(1$
&/($1,1*6(59,&(6 3$5.6(59,&(6
&/($1,1*6(59,&(6 &,7<+$//

081,&,3$/(0(5*(1&<6(59,&(6

,1 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

081,&,3$/(0(5*(1&<6(59,&(6 &RQWLQXHG
1$&0(&+$1,&$/ (/(&75,&$/6(59,&(6

%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(

1(2*29

,19 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 3(56211(/3$<52//

1257+$0(5,&$16$)(7<

81,)2506&/27+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$5.
81,)2506&/27+,1* 675((7
81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$5.
81,)2506&/27+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17

1257+(516$)(7<7(&+12/2*<,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( $'0,1,675$7,21
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17

1257+:(67$63+$/7,1&

,03529(0(176,1)5$6758&785( &,7<+$//

2)),&(2)01,76(59,&(6

: 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
: 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ':,)25)(,785(

2/6(1&+$,1 &$%/(&2,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( /,)767$7,210$,17

2:(16&203$1,(6,1&

%8,/',1*0$,17 /,%5$5<

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

3(7(56216+((70(7$/,1& &RQWLQXHG
%8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

3203

67,5(
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17

3233('&251//&

5(&5($7,216833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

35$+$',67:$7(572<28

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21

35,17'<1$0,;

35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 81$//2&$7('

352)(66,21$/6(59,&(,1'8675,(6,1&

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &,7<+$//
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &,7<+$//

48$/,7<)227&$5(

-$1 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

48$/,7<21($8720$7,21,1&

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$5.6(59,&(6
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 7((1&(17(5
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 7((1&(17(5
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ,&($5(1$
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ,&($5(1$

5 563(&,$/7,(62):,6&216,1,1&

,1 %8,/',1*6 ,&($5(1$
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

5 563(&,$/7,(62):,6&216,1,1& &RQWLQXHG

5,9(5)521735,17,1*

2)),&(6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
2)),&(6833/,(6 ),1$1&(
35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),1$1&(
35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),1$1&(
35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),1$1&(
35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* (1*,1((5,1*
35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* ),1$1&(
2)),&(6833/,(6 ,19(67,*$7,21

5-0&216758&7,21

35 %8,/',1*6 &20081,7<&(17(5 ,&($5(1$

52%(57%+,//&2

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 /,%5$5<
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(

57/&216758&7,21

%8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

6&277&275($685(5

,1 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 32/,&(
,1 75$163257$7,21 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
,1 '8(6 3$752/
,1 '8(6 ),5(
,1 '8(6 0$<25 &281&,/
,1 '8(6 3$752/
,1 &20387(56(59,&(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6&277&275($685(5 &RQWLQXHG
,1 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 32/,&(

6(+,1&

(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 0$1+2/(/,1,1*5(3/$&(0(1
(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 675((7/,*+7,1*

6+$.23((&+$0%(52)&200(5&(

&21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 32/,&(

6+$.23((&+(9,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 5(&5($7,21

6+$.23((*5$9(/,1&

0$7(5,$/6 612: 6$1'

6+$.23((72:,1*,1&

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 5(&5($7,21

6+,,17(51$7,21$/&253

% 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

6+5('5,*+7$52+1,1'8675,(6&2

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 32/,&(
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&25'6,0$*,1*

6+50

,'-(11,)(5*$%%$5' '8(6 3(56211(/3$<52//

6,03/(;*5,11(///3

%8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//
%8,/',1*0$,17 322/
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6,03/(;*5,11(///3 &RQWLQXHG
%8,/',1*0$,17 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
%8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//
%8,/',1*0$,17 /,%5$5<

60,7+-50$85,&(

-$10,6& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&25'6
5(,0%

62/$5:,1'6,1&

41 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

6287+:(671(:63$3(5,1&

'(&(0%(5 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 32/,&(
'(&(0%(5 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3$752/

635,1*67(',1&

),6&$/$*(17)((6 %%/'*5()81',1*%21'6
),6&$/$*(17)((6 $*2,03%21'6
),6&$/$*(17)((6 $*2,03%21'6
),6&$/$*(17)((6 %*2,03%21'6
),6&$/$*(17)((6 $*2,03%21'6
),6&$/$*(17)((6 $*2,03%21'6
),6&$/$*(17)((6 *2,03%21'6
),6&$/$*(17)((6 $*27$;$%$7(0(17%21'
),6&$/$*(17)((6 7,)',675,&7
),6&$/$*(17)((6 7,)',675,&7
),6&$/$*(17)((6 7,)',675,&7

675$7(*,&,16,*+76,1&

3/$1,7 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(

675(,&+(5

6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

675(,&+(5
6 &RQWLQXHG
, 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
, 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
, 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/

6800,7&203$1,(6

%8,/',1*0$,17 /,%5$5<
%8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//

7(50,1$/6833/<&2

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17

7+(%,*3,&785(

-2%7%3 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/

7+(&251(5%$//2216+233(

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

7+(,6(1-$.(

81,)250 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(
$//2:$1&(

72(1<$1'8$1(

%227 81,)2506&/27+,1* )$&,/,7,(6
$//2:$1&(

8/,1(

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

8366725(

3267$*( ),5(

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,),('&5('(17,$/6,1& &RQWLQXHG
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 /,&(16(6
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ,&($5(1$
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 612: 6$1'
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 %8,/',1*,163(&7,21
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 /,&(16(6
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3/$11,1*
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 612: 6$1'

9(5,=211(7:25.)/((7

269 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
269 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:((3,1*

9,6,217(&+12/2*<62/87,216//&

62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

:(673$<0(17&75

62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,19(67,*$7,21

:6% $662&,1&

(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 675((75(&216758&7,21
(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 7+$9(5(&216758&7,21
(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176 3$5.$66(7,6)81'

=(0$1-(11,)(5

63,5,70717,&.(76 -$10,6& 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 7((1&(17(5
5(,0%

=(30$18)$&785,1*&2

%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &,7<+$//
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 /,%5$5<
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

=(30$18)$&785,1*&2 &RQWLQXHG
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(

=,(*/(5,1&

6: (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17
9(+ = (48,30(17 685)$&(:$7(5)81'

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06

$0$=21&20 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
&2038/,1.0$1$*(0(17&(1 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
863632 '(& 3267$*( ,163(&7,21
0(1$5'6%85169,//(01 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
7+(+20('(327 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
237,&63/$1(7,1& '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
,1 3,9$5,$%/(6,1& '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 75,%$/6(59,&(6
35,0(5$:(%6725( '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
,03$5. '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& )851,6+,1*6127&$3,7$/,=(' )/((7
2)),&(0$;2)),&('(327 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
%8,/'$6,*1&20 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
7$5*(7 '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
:$/*5((16 '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
6:,0287/(7&20 '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 322/
/,)(*8$5'6725(21/,1( '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 322/
(/,9$7( '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
(/,9$7( '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
&963+$50$&< '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
07' 752<%,/7 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
6$)(.,'6:25/':,'( '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
'(/7$$,5 '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 5(&25'6,0$*,1*
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
3/85$/6,*+7 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
62/$5:,1'6 '(& 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
/2:(6 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$0$=21&20 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
&21*5(66)257+(1(: '(& '8(6 3/$11,1*
$0$=21&20 '(& 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 3/$11,1*
(&2120,&'(9(/230(17$662 '(& '8(6 ('$0$1$*(0(17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
(&2120,&'(9(/230(17$662 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ('$0$1$*(0(17
(&2120,&'(9(/230(17$662 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ('$0$1$*(0(17
0,11(627$081,&,3$/87 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
/2:(6 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
'$9(69$//(<632576 '(& 81,)2506&/27+,1* ,163(&7,21
,17
/&2'(&281&,/,1& '(& 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 ,163(&7,21
1257+(51722/(48,3017 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )/((7
0(1$5'6('(135$,5,(01 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
0,//6)/((7)$50 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 <287+%8,/',1*
0(1$5'6('(135$,5,(01 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
&68&,9,/(1*,1((5,1* '(& 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 (1*,1((5,1*
&68&,9,/(1*,1((5,1* '(& 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 (1*,1((5,1*
-$0$57(&+12/2*,(6,1& '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
2)),&(0$;2)),&('(327 '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
,1 287/,1(,1'8675,(6// '(& (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( (48,30(170$,17
$0$=21&20 '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 3$5.
'2187&211(&7,212)6+ '(& )22' )/((7
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 675((7
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
'2187&211(&7,212)6+ '(& )22' )/((7
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6,*10$,17
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6,*10$,17
3$<)/2:3$<3$/ '(& &5(',7&$5')((6 ,163(&7,21
3$<)/2:3$<3$/ '(& &5(',7&$5')((6 5(&5($7,21
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 81$//2&$7('
8/,1( 6+,36833/,(6 '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
3$5$',6(&$5:$6+:% '(& (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
&$%(/$6&20 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
6&$/(385&+$6( '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
7+(8366725( '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
8/,1( 6+,36833/,(6 '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
-,00<-2+16( '(& )22' (1*,1((5,1*
2)),&(0$;2)),&('(327 '(& 2)),&(6833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
0,11(627$*29(510(17),1 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),1$1&(
'2//$5*(1(5$/ '(& '(6,*1$7('0,6&(//$1(286 0$<25 &281&,/
:$/*5((16 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,&$7,216
:$/*5((16 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,&$7,216
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
521
6&/($1(56 '(& 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$752/
,17
/&2'(&281&,/,1& '(& 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 ),5(
1$57(&,1& '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )25)(,785(
+($76+((76 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 32/,&(
%&$75$,1,1*('8&$7,21 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3$752/
81'(;7/($51,1*0.3 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ,19(67,*$7,21
&0,,1& '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
%&$75$,1,1*('8&$7,21 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3$752/
,3-$&.6215$03 '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
&0,,1& '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
(9,'(17,1& '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )25)(,785(
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
675(,&+(5
602 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
,03$5. '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
,03$5. '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
,17(51$7,21$/3$57<0)* '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
&+$1+$66(1',11(57+($75( '(& 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
:$/*5((16 '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
.:,.75,3 '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
67$*(67+($75(&203$1< '(& 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
&8%)22'6 '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
$0$=21&20$0=1&20%,// '(& 5(&5($7,216833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
0,':$<86$&20 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
,1 &5($7,9(352'8&76285 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )25)(,785(
/2:(572:13$5.,1* '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
%52:1(//6,1& '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
(,/((16&2/266$/&22.,(6 '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 32/,&(
81'(;7/($51,1*0.3 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3$752/
7+(+20('(327 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 38%/,&%/'* *5281'60$,17
75$&7256833/< '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
32//87,21&21752/$*(1&< '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
$552:+($'(0(5*(1&< '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
$552:+($'(0(5*(1&< '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
6$)(.,'6:25/':,'( '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
$0$=21&20$0=1&20%,// '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
,03$5. '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
,03$5. '(& 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
6+$.23((&200&(17(52/ '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
6+$.23((&200&(17(52/ '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$3/ ,781(6&20%,// '(& 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
),/7(56)$67 '(& %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
'(3$570(172)/$%25$1', '(& '8(6 )$&,/,7,(6
5$':(//,17/,1& '(& %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
:0683(5&(17(5 '(& 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 32/,&(
6(16,%/(/$1'86(&2$/,7, '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3/$11,1*
&8%)22'6 '(& )22' 3/$11,1*
6(16,%/(/$1'86(&2$/,7, '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3/$11,1*
*26+,30(176 '(& %$1.)((616))(( ),5(
3$<3$/ 0,66,21//& '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
9(57,&$/(1'($9256%/2 '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
1257+),(/'/,1(6027 '(& 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ),5(
33 0,66,21//& '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
6$)(.,'6:25/':,'( '(& &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(

86%$1.0(5&+$17&211(&7

86%$1.0(5&+$17)((6 '(&(0%(5 &5(',7&$5')((6 5(&5($7,21
86%$1.0(5&+$17)((6 '(&(0%(5 &5(',7&$5')((6 ,163(&7,21
86%$1.0(5&+$17)((6 '(&(0%(5 &5(',7&$5')((6 ,163(&7,21
86%$1.0(5&+$17)((6 '(&(0%(5 &5(',7&$5')((6 ),5(
86%$1.0(5&+$17)((6 '(&(0%(5 &5(',7&$5')((6 52:0*7

$1&+25%$1.

'(%,76&+(&.6)(( '(&(0%(5 ,17(5(67 *(1(5$/)81'
'(326,7(',7(0)(( '(&(0%(5 ,17(5(67 *(1(5$/)81'
$&+25,*,1$7,213(5,7(0)(( '(&(0%(5 ,17(5(67 *(1(5$/)81'
326,7,9(3$<)(( '(&(0%(5 ,17(5(67 *(1(5$/)81'
$8720(0%(56+,35(78513+$7721 '(&(0%(5 %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5
$8720(0%(56+,35(78513+,336 '(&(0%(5 %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5
$8720(0%(56+,35(7851+(1. '(&(0%(5 %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5
$8720(0%(56+,35(78516&+,()( '(&(0%(5 %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5
$8720(0%(56+,35(78513,1('$ '(&(0%(5 %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

$1&+25%$1. &RQWLQXHG
&+$5*(%$&.)((2/621 '(&(0%(5 %$1.)((616))(( ),1$1&(

6+$.23((3')25)(,785(6

0853+< ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
0853+< ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
0853+< ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
0853+< (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 (6&52:)81'
%2(6( ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
%2(6( ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
%2(6( ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
%2(6( (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 (6&52:)81'
+(*$57< ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
+(*$57< ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
+(*$57< ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
+(*$57< (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 (6&52:)81'
01'(372)/$%25 ,1'8675<

%/'*,163685&+*307 '(&(0%(5 %/'*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 '(&(0%(5 3/80%,1*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 '(&(0%(5 (/(&75,&3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 '(&(0%(5 +($7,1*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 '(&(0%(5 : 63(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 '(&(0%(5 ),5(3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+*307 '(&(0%(5 $'0,1,675$7,9(&+$5*(6 ,163(&7,21

01'2563(&,$/)8(/7$;

)8(/7$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 )8(/7$;3$<$%/( *(1(5$/)81'

01'256$/(67$;

6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 )8(/7$;3$<$%/( *(1(5$/)81'
6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 86(7$; *(1(5$/)81'
6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 6$/(67$;3$<$%/( *(1(5$/)81'
6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 6$/(67$;3$<$%/( 3$5.5(6(59(

9$1&26(59,&(6

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9$1&26(59,&(6 &RQWLQXHG
0217+/<352*5$0)(( '(&(0%(5 %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5

$%*

+6$)((6 -$18$5< 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3(56211(/3$<52//
)6$)((6 -$18$5< 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3(56211(/3$<52//

6:0'7))25)(,785(6

'(/*$'2 (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
'(/*$'2 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
'(/*$'2 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
'(/*$'2 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
0,&.2/,&+(. (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
0,&.2/,&+(. ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
0,&.2/,&+(. ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
0,&.2/,&+(. ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
9$1=$1'7 (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
9$1=$1'7 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
9$1=$1'7 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
9$1=$1'7 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
1(:0$175$;/(5 (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
1(:0$175$;/(5 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
1(:0$175$;/(5 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
1(:0$175$;/(5 ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
/(1= (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
/(1= ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
/(1= ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
/(1= ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
86%$1.'(%76(59,&(3$<0(17

*2,PSURY%$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(35,1&,3$/ %%/'*5()81',1*%21'6
*2,PSURY%$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 %%/'*5()81',1*%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(35,1&,3$/ $*2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 $*2,03%21'6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

86%$1.'(%76(59,&(3$<0(17 &RQWLQXHG
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(35,1&,3$/ $*2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 $*2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(35,1&,3$/ $*2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 $*2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(35,1&,3$/ $*2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 $*2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(35,1&,3$/ *2,03%21'6
*2,PSURY$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 *2,03%21'6
*2$EDWHPHQW$$XJ )(%%21'6 '(%76(59,&(,17(5(67 $*27$;$%$7(0(17%21'

*UDQG7RWDO 3D\PHQW,QVWUXPHQW7RWDOV
&KHFNV
()73D\PHQWV
7RWDO3D\PHQWV
5&.6 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((
1RWH3D\PHQWDPRXQWPD\QRWUHIOHFWWKHDFWXDODPRXQWGXHWRGDWDVHTXHQFLQJDQGRUGDWDVHOHFWLRQ &RXQFLO&KHFN6XPPDU\ 3DJH

&RPSDQ\ $PRXQW
*(1(5$/)81'
)25)(,785(
(&2120,&'(9(/230(17$87+25,7<
%%/'*5()81',1*%21'6
$*2,03%21'6
$*2,03%21'6
%*2,03%21'6
$*2,03%21'6
$*2,03%21'6
$*25()81',1*%21'
$*27$;$%$7(0(17%21'
3$5.5(6(59(
&$3,7$/,03529(0(17)81'
7,)',675,&7
&20081,7<&(17(5 ,&($5(1$
&,7<+$//
6(:(5)81'
685)$&(:$7(5)81'
3$5.$66(7,6)81'
,1)27(&+,6)81'
6(/),1685$1&(,6)81'
6:0(752'58*7$6.)25&(
(6&52:)81'
,19(670(1775867)81'
5HSRUW7RWDOV
D.2.

MEMO
FROM: Lori j. Hensen, City Clerk

Subject:
City Council Minutes from December 20, 2016
Approve the minutes as presented
Recommendation:
Approve the minutes as presented
Discussion:
Budget Impact:
ATTACHMENTS:
December 20, 2016

D.3.

MEMO
FROM: Lori Hensen, City Clerk

Subject:
Tobacco License for Empire Gas & Grocery LLC.
Approve the application and grant a tobacco license to Empire Gas & Grocery LLC, 312 First Avenue
West.
Recommendation:
Approve the application and grant a tobacco license to Empire Gas & Grocery LLC.
Discussion:
City staff have received an application from Abpiaziz Farah of Empire Gas & Grocery LLC to sell
tobacco products at retail at 312 First Avenue West. The application is in order. The Police
Department has conducted the customary background investigation and learned of nothing that would
prevent the issuance of a tobacco license.
Budget Impact:
None
D.4.

MEMO
FROM: Lori J. Hensen City Clerk

Subject:
Temporary Liquor License for the Shakopee Senior Graduation Party Inc.
Approve the temporary on-sale liquor license for the Shakopee Senior Graduation Party Inc. fund
raiser at 1100 Canterbury Road on March 2, 2017
Recommendation:
Approve the temporary on-sale liquor license
Discussion:
The Shakopee Senior Graduation Party has made application for a temporary on-sale liquor license
for March 2, 2017 at Canterbury Park. They are planning a wine tasting event as a fundraiser for the
annual Senior All Night Graduation Party. State law permits wine tasting when conducted by a
charitable, religious, or non-profit organization with a temporary on-sale liquor license.
Budget Impact:
None
D.5.

MEMO
FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk

Subject:
Temporary Liquor License for Parish of Saint Joachim and Anne
Approve the temporary on-sale liquor license to the Parish of Saint Joachim & Anne, 350 Atwood
Street, for February 25, 2017.
Recommendation:
Approve the temporary on-sale liquor license.
Discussion:
The Parish of Saint Joachim & Anne has made application for a temporary on-sale liquor license for
February 25, 2017 for their annual Winterfest to be held at 350 Atwood Street South in St. Mark's
Church gym and cafeteria.
Budget Impact:
None
A.1.

MEMO
FROM: Michael Kerski

Subject:
Currently Massage Establishments are considered retail and are allowed in any zoning classification
where retail uses are allowed. Adoption of this Ordinance would provide a definition for Massage
Establishments that matches other sections of the City Code and allows them only in the B-1 Zoning
District by Conditional Use.
Adopt Ordinance No. 956
Recommendation:
Staff presented this to the Planning Commission, which held a Public Hearing, and also unanimously
adopted and forward it to Council with a recommendation for approval.
Discussion:
Massage Establishments are regulated currently by licensing by the City Clerk. It has been found that
certain establishments can have a negative impact on neighborhoods and other users or tenants in
adjacent areas because of traffic, hours of operation and the possibility of other activity occurring in
the area. Limiting locations to the B-1 Districts keeps them away from some neighborhoods and
allows an additional oversight and input from the public. This use would require posting, a
neighborhood meeting and public hearing.
Budget Impact:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 956

ORDINANCE NO. 956
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AMENDING TITLE XV OF THE CITY

CODE BY ADDING DEFINITION FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS TO 151.002
DEFINITIONS AND ALLOWING ESTABLISHMENTS ONLY IN THE B-1 ZONING DISTRICT
UNDER 151.013, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS ZONES.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
151.002 DEFINITIONS
MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS. Those establishments where the principal use and service is providing
therapeutic massage as defined in Chapter 116 including any enterprise, establishment, or operation,
whether under control of an individual or legal entity, providing or offering to provide massage therapy
services within the city for a fee or other consideration paid either directly or indirectly, that:
(a) Has 1 or more massage therapists employed or contracted to provide massage therapy
services for the massage therapy business; or
(b) Is in a fixed location in a nonresidential zoning district within the city wherein massage
therapy services are provided.
(2) Any health or medical facility, office, or clinic operated by state licensed medical
professional(s) or any health or medical-related business operated by state licensed medical
professional(s) duly licensed under the provisions of M.S. 144.50 through 144.60, as they may be
amended from time to time, which provides therapeutic massage to its patients, shall not be deemed to be
a massage therapy business.
151.013 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS ZONES.
(B) Specific standards for Residential/Business/Industrial Zones. In addition to the standards specified in
151.011, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will consider the specific standards contained in this
division (B) when deciding whether a conditional use permit should be granted
(52) Massage Establishment allowed only in B-1 zone.
(a) Operation and operators shall meet all the requirements of City Code Chapter 116 prior to
application.
(b) Windows and doors facing the primary street address shall be transparent and allow
visibility into the establishment except for signage as permitted by the City Sign Code.
(c) Locate at least 500 feet from a place of worship, school, park, or other Massage
Establishment.
(d) Can be revoked for violation of City Code Chapter 116.

Adopted in _______________ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held this ________ day of ____________, 2017
_____________________________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________________
City Clerk
A.2.

MEMO
FROM: Michael Kerski

Subject:
Review of City-owned properties
Input from Council on disposition strategies.
Recommendation:
Give feedback to staff on current strategies.
Discussion:
The City owns several properties in the City for redevelopment. Attached is a Powerpoint
highlighting each property.
1. Three acres adjacent to trailer park. Acquired through tax sale. Waiting for snow to melt piled on
site. Contract for survey. There appears to be encroachments from the trailer park. We need to
resolve. Likely candidates to purchase are office or restaurant.
2. Three Downtown sites.

a. Existing City Hall and parking lot
b. Old Gas Station site
c. Lot adjacent to the river
3. Lot at 69/169
We have interest for at least one site and staff is recommending development of a small business park,
something identified in the Maxfield Study as a use that Shakopee needs. Would require road and
utility construction since none of the sites have utility access. Road project is in the current CIP.
Great opportunity for job and business growth.
Currently are in court to resolve some title issues. Concept road design completed. Concept lot
layout completed.
Budget Impact:
Road will need to be constructed with utilities at 69/169 parcel.
ATTACHMENTS:
Powerpoint on property
Update on City-owned Land
C
B
A
C
B.1.

MEMO
FROM: Jamie Polley

Subject:
Discuss the Revised Plans for the Lions Park Warming House Project No. PR2016-2 (A,B)
To provide staff with direction on the construction package desired for the replacement of the Lions
Park warming house.
Recommendation:
Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the rebidding of the new shelter/warming house
to include the garage and covered area that will provide the community with a fully functional, year
round shelter.
Discussion:
In July of 2016 staff presented plans to replace the warming house at Lions Park with a new warming
house/shelter that can be used year round. The existing warming house is beyond repairs and will be
removed in 2017. The new shelter has a similar design to the city's existing park shelters without the
open air portion and with the addition of a garage to house a tractor and portable Zamboni. To reduce
the cost in the initial design, the block walls were reduced from a full block wall to a wall with three
feet of block and the remainder of the wall wood framed. The engineers estimate for the initial design
was $562,969.00.
On September 6th, 2016 the City Council rejected all bids for the construction of the Lions Park
warming house/shelter. The lowest base came in at $506,500. The Park Asset Fund allocated
$500,000 for the shelter however the design and geotechnical fees were $51,750.00 leaving
approximately $448,250 for construction and contingency. Staff was directed to reevaluate the design
and make changes to reduce the cost prior to the consideration of reallocating funds within the Park
Asset Fund.
The initial shelter design was a very basic shelter however staff of different departments have
reviewed options to reduce the costs of the shelter. In the redesign each area was reduced in size for a
total reduction of 417 sq feet. The pitch of the roof was reduced and the estimate includes asphalt
shingles versus standing seem metal for the roofing materials. The new engineer's estimate is
$482,524. This design still does not include the open air portion. The shelter cost could be further
reduced by $78,206 by removing the garage bringing the new estimate to $404,318.
The shelter without the open air portion is not desirable. The cost to add the open air portion so that
the shelter resembles the other city park shelters is $38,875. The addition of the garage to this shelter
is recommended by staff to house the tractor and portable Zamboni that was purchased in 2016 and
utilized to maintain all the city rinks. The equipment needs a heated area and water source. The
garage would also be utilized for storage by the Parks and Recreation Department for programs and
by Public Works for off season storage. The added storage and components of the other city shelters
would allow for this shelter to be utilized year round for programs, events, rentals and a variety of
other activities. The shelter will also provide Lions Park larger unisex restrooms to better serve the
Fun for All Playground.
Budget Impact:
The Park Asset Fund allocates $500,000 for the removal and replacement of the Lions Park warming
house/shelter. Design and geotechnical services for the initial design and redesign totaled $63,750.
$436,250 remains allocated for the removal of the existing building and construction plus
contingency of the new shelter. The shelter could be bid without the garage and open air portions in
the base bid. The garage and open air portion could be bid as add alternates.
Upon bidding the project the City Council can determine if the bids would be accepted and if
additional funding is needed. Additional funds could also be reallocated within the Park Asset Fund.
The 2016 Park Asset Fund included $225,000 for various Community Center project outside the
scope of the large project. Approximately $40,000 of these allocated funds were not utilized. The
Park Asset Fund is a working fund that allows for projects to be moved within the fund as needs arise,
allowing additional funds to be allocated to the desired projects.
ATTACHMENTS:
Plan Comparisons 2016-2017

C.1.

MEMO
FROM: Darin Nelson, Finance Director

Subject:
Monthly Financial Review
No official action is sought, this is the monthly review of the General fund revenues and
expenditures.
Recommendation:
N/A - Informational Purposes Only
Discussion:
December 2016 Review (see attachments)
Even though the new year has begun, that doesn't mean 2016 is complete. Financial reports are
snapshot in time. There are many revenues and expenditures along with various other year-end entries
that need to be made. We will be paying bills and collecting receipts all related to 2016 well into
February.
As you may recall, the 2017 budget included a revised or final 2016 budget. The first attached report
(December 2016 Monthly Financial Report) includes the revised 2016 budget in lieu of the original
budget. The second attached report compares the original and revised budget with a variance analysis
between year-to-date expenditures and the revised 2016 budget.
The revised revenue budget was increased by approximately $1 million and the revised expenditure
budget was reduced by $1.1 million. Excess reserves are being transferred to the city hall construction
project, debt service reserves and the self-insurance fund. The original 2016 budget had a planned
deficit of $449,000, the final budget has a budgeted surplus of $453,000.
Revenue Variances
Licenses & Permits will end the year with over $1 million more in revenue than originally
budgeted and still over $290,000 more than the revised budget.
Charges for Services exceeded budget due to:
Increased community center general admissions of $28,000.
Increased community center membership of $48,000.
Increased contracted police services of $52,000.
Increased engineering and grading fees of $90,000.
Miscellaneous revenues are about $50,000 over budget due to increased interest revenue and
other miscellaneous revenues such insurance reimbursements and the sale of various minor
surplus assets.
Expenditure Variances
Administration
The revised salary budget includes wage distributions for various staff members. Actual
wages were not distributed, so administration wages are more than anticipated. For
example, three percent of the city administrator's salary was budgeted to come from the
EDA. However, 100 percent was charged to administration.
Finance
The city collects lodging tax and passes these collections onto the Shakopee Convention
and Business Bureau. Collections exceeded expectations. We budgeted $308,750 of
lodging tax disbursements compared to actual 2016 disbursements of $368,000. Lodging
tax is a budget neutral expenditure, since we only disburse what the city first receives.
Building Inspections
Actual expenditures are about $95,000 more than the revised budget. This overage is
mainly due the implementation of an electronic review system, Project Docs, which is set
to go live in early 2017. Expenditures for this new system include software, training and
large format scanners. This project is being paid for with surplus building inspection
revenue.
Another contributor to the variance is the actual charging of plan review time exceeded the
anticipated budget. Employees from other divisions such as engineering, fire, and planning
charge time to plan review with building inspections. This accounts for about $35,000 of
the variance.
Street Maintenance
Actual expenditures are about $53,000 more than the revised budget due to street light
change outs on Southbridge Parkway along with additional sealcoating expenditures.
Fleet
The implementation of a new fleet management system approved by council back in July
was not accounted for in the revised budget. Set up costs of approximately $26,000
includes computer hardware and software along with the necessary tool chests needed to
accompany the computer setups.
Natural Resources
Actual expenditures are $57,000 under budget. Staff is still expecting a 2016 invoice for
tree pruning for approximately $50,000.
It should be noted that revised expenditure budgets were generally reduced compared to the
original budgets. Most departments that are over their revised budget would still be under their
respective original budget. This was the first year of implementing revised budgets, so staff is
still learning how to fine tune the revised budget. The revised budget did anticipate a year-end
surplus, so overages will not materially effect the General Fund's financial position.
January 2017 Review (see attachment)
Analyzing revenues and expenditure one month into the fiscal year is often limited since the scope of
time is so narrow. About the only line item of significance that is worth noting is the Mayor &
Council expenditure budget. This is a relatively small budget compared to other departmental
expenditures. This budget also experiences a number of large expenditures at the beginning of each
year which can easily distort the variance analysis. Council & Mayor expenditures for January 2017
are inline with expenditures from January 2016, and all of the expenditures taking place are expected
and accounted for.
Community Center & Ice Arena Year-to-Year Comparison
The last attachment is comparison of the community center and ice arena expenditures from January
2016 to January 2017. The annual budget is also included in this report. Just like the January
comparison for the General Fund, comparing one months worth of data is difficult.
An item to note is the revenue for the ice arena for January 2016 is actually a negative amount. This
is strictly due to an accounting shift. The city received a payment in February 2016 for December
2015 services. Due to this being 2015 revenue a journal entry was needed to move the dollars into
the correct year. Part of this journal entry includes eliminating the 2016 receipt via a reversing entry.
The reversal entry date is coded by our accounting system as January 1, 2016. Since the actual
receipt came in February, there is no revenue in January to offset the reversing entry causing the
books to show a negative revenue amount for January. Next month's report will look more in line
from 2016 to 2017.
Budget Impact:
N/A - Informational Purposes Only
ATTACHMENTS:
December 2016 Monthly Financial Report

2016 Original & Final Budget with YTD Comparison
January 2017 Monthly Financial Report
January 2017 Community Center & Ice Arena Year-to-Year Comparison
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Monthly Financial Report
Di
YTD December YTD Budget YTD
vis
2016 2016 2016 Balance Percent 2015
io
Budget Actual Actual Remaining Used Actual
n
01000 - GENERAL FUND
REVENUES:
* - TAXES (17,150,900) (7,868,710) (17,021,316) (129,584) 99% (16,160,074)
* - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (11,500) (17,173) (15,818) 4,318 138% (12,043)
* - LICENSES AND PERMITS (2,269,100) (158,990) (2,560,651) 291,551 113% (2,023,436)
* - INTERGOVERNMENTAL (1,251,900) (74,372) (1,263,240) 11,340 101% (1,356,734)
* - CHARGES FOR SERVICES (4,377,650) (434,029) (4,573,498) 195,848 104% (4,461,510)
* - FINES AND FORFEITS (1,500) (3,710) (11,213) 9,713 748% (7,093)
* - MISCELLANEOUS (198,850) (54,799) (249,418) 50,568 125% (310,395)
TOTAL REVENUES (25,261,400) (8,611,783) (25,695,153) 433,753 102% (24,331,286)
EXPENDITURES:
11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL 176,990 8,251 170,994 5,996 97% 208,849
12 - ADMINISTRATION 1,355,860 154,788 1,388,317 (32,457) 102% 1,096,915
13 - CITY CLERK 326,030 29,414 321,189 4,841 99% 384,513
15 - FINANCE 1,154,300 136,392 1,181,520 (27,220) 102% 1,123,583
17 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 501,720 47,128 458,835 42,885 91% 475,453
18 - FACILITIES 363,810 47,317 360,478 3,332 99% 378,072
31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT 7,750,810 724,309 7,703,604 47,206 99% 7,527,530
32 - FIRE 2,059,380 201,875 2,070,664 (11,284) 101% 2,096,522
33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 606,910 81,415 701,553 (94,643) 116% 645,720
41 - ENGINEERING 627,340 46,770 608,149 19,191 97% 642,942
42 - STREET MAINTENANCE 1,934,790 318,921 1,996,967 (62,177) 103% 2,001,289
44 - FLEET 403,310 37,136 431,269 (27,959) 107% 392,053
46 - PARK MAINTENANCE 1,570,640 145,266 1,565,107 5,533 100% 1,572,214
66 - NATURAL RESOURCES 200,410 7,177 143,139 57,271 71% 106,458
67 - RECREATION 2,462,810 299,889 2,443,002 19,808 99% 2,238,397
91 - UNALLOCATED 217,580 4,948 39,882 177,698 18% 173,247
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 21,712,690 2,290,997 21,584,671 128,019 99% 21,063,757
OTHER FINANCING #
* - TRANSFERS IN (250,000) 0 (250,000) 0 100% # (250,000)
* - TRANSFERS OUT 3,345,000 0 2,103,755 1,241,246 63% # 3,515,466
OTHER FINANCING TOTAL 3,095,000 0 1,853,755 1,241,246 60% # 3,265,466
FUND TOTAL (453,710) (6,320,786) (2,256,728) 1,803,018 # (2,063)
Key
Varies more than 10% than budget positively
Varies more than 10% than budget negatively
Within 10% of budget
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
2016 Budget Report
2016 2016 2016

Budget Balance Percent
Division Original Revised YTD
Remaining Used
Budget Budget Actual
REVENUES: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
* - TAXES 17,150,900.00 17,150,900.00 17,021,316.31 129,583.69 99.24%
* - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 11,500.00 11,500.00 15,817.76 (4,317.76) 137.55%
* - LICENSES AND PERMITS 1,504,100.00 2,269,100.00 2,560,650.50 (291,550.50) 112.85%
* - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,108,500.00 1,251,900.00 1,263,240.31 (11,340.31) 100.91%
* - CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,235,775.00 4,377,650.00 4,573,497.92 (195,847.92) 104.47%
* - FINES AND FORFEITS 1,500.00 1,500.00 11,213.08 (9,713.08) 747.54%
* - MISCELLANEOUS 215,748.00 198,850.00 249,417.53 (50,567.53) 125.43%
TOTAL REVENUES 24,228,023.00 25,261,400.00 25,695,153.41 (433,753.41) 101.72%
EXPENDITURES: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL (185,260.00) (176,990.00) (170,994.30) (5,995.70) 96.61%
12 - ADMINISTRATION (1,555,530.00) (1,355,860.00) (1,388,317.15) 32,457.15 102.39%
13 - CITY CLERK (399,170.00) (326,030.00) (321,189.23) (4,840.77) 98.52%
15 - FINANCE (1,243,700.00) (1,154,300.00) (1,181,519.80) 27,219.80 102.36%
17 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (674,905.00) (501,720.00) (458,834.93) (42,885.07) 91.45%
18 - FACILITIES (408,986.00) (363,810.00) (360,478.41) (3,331.59) 99.08%
31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT (7,625,014.00) (7,750,810.00) (7,703,603.93) (47,206.07) 99.39%
32 - FIRE (2,079,785.00) (2,059,380.00) (2,070,663.68) 11,283.68 100.55%
33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG (669,967.00) (606,910.00) (701,553.33) 94,643.33 115.59%
41 - ENGINEERING (739,178.00) (627,340.00) (608,148.98) (19,191.02) 96.94%
42 - STREET MAINTENANCE (2,225,116.00) (1,934,790.00) (1,996,967.39) 62,177.39 103.21%
44 - FLEET (429,595.00) (403,310.00) (431,268.90) 27,958.90 106.93%
46 - PARK MAINTENANCE (1,644,596.00) (1,570,640.00) (1,565,107.06) (5,532.94) 99.65%
66 - NATURAL RESOURCES (198,092.00) (200,410.00) (143,139.46) (57,270.54) 71.42%
67 - RECREATION (2,529,679.00) (2,462,810.00) (2,443,002.22) (19,807.78) 99.20%
91 - UNALLOCATED (218,450.00) (217,580.00) (39,882.39) (177,697.61) 18.33%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (22,827,023.00) (21,712,690.00) (21,584,671.16) (128,018.84) 99.41%
OTHER FINANCING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
* - TRANSFERS IN 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 0.00 100.00%
* - TRANSFERS OUT (2,100,000.00) (3,345,000.00) (2,103,754.50) (1,241,245.50) 62.89%
OTHER FINANCING TOTAL (1,850,000.00) (3,095,000.00) (1,853,754.50) (1,241,245.50) 59.90%
FUND TOTAL (449,000.00) 453,710.00 2,256,727.75 (1,803,017.75) 497.39%
2/2/2017 1:53:34 PM Page 1 of 1

CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Monthly Financial Report
Di
YTD January YTD Budget January YTD
vis
2017 2017 2017 Balance Percent 2016
io
Budget Actual Actual Remaining Used Actual
n
REVENUES:
* - TAXES (16,568,400) 0 0 (16,568,400) 0% 0
* - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (12,000) 17,195 17,195 (29,195) (143)% 0
* - LICENSES AND PERMITS (1,683,400) (60,875) (60,875) (1,622,525) 4% (44,843)
* - INTERGOVERNMENTAL (1,287,100) (375) (375) (1,286,725) 0% 9,917
* - CHARGES FOR SERVICES (4,937,400) (589,739) (589,608) (4,347,792) 12% (423,018)
* - FINES AND FORFEITS (1,500) (300) (300) (1,200) 20% (500)
* - MISCELLANEOUS (213,400) (8,942) (6,460) (206,940) 3% (13,688)
TOTAL REVENUES (24,703,200) (643,035) (640,423) (24,062,777) 3% (472,132)
EXPENDITURES:
11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL 197,900 18,543 49,506 148,394 25% 15,124
12 - ADMINISTRATION 1,707,000 93,903 99,779 1,607,221 6% 67,677
13 - CITY CLERK 318,000 15,752 15,793 302,207 5% 17,327
15 - FINANCE 1,207,900 28,650 32,713 1,175,187 3% 31,442
17 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 586,800 27,657 27,749 559,051 5% 28,659
18 - FACILITIES 384,800 12,195 19,162 365,638 5% 26,338
31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT 7,980,000 432,364 495,640 7,484,360 6% 531,366
32 - FIRE 2,160,400 63,856 103,021 2,057,379 5% 96,479
33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG 796,200 54,562 60,470 735,730 8% 36,782
41 - ENGINEERING 786,200 25,714 37,556 748,644 5% 45,842
42 - STREET MAINTENANCE 2,151,100 88,709 94,709 2,056,391 4% 106,622
44 - FLEET 435,000 26,401 26,426 408,574 6% 26,334
46 - PARK MAINTENANCE 1,936,300 52,373 56,790 1,879,510 3% 75,126
66 - NATURAL RESOURCES 198,000 5,090 5,090 192,910 3% 8,018
67 - RECREATION 3,190,000 106,346 129,493 3,060,507 4% 120,883
91 - UNALLOCATED 217,600 47 1,202 216,398 1% (9,431)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 24,253,200 1,052,161 1,255,099 22,998,101 5% 1,224,588
OTHER FINANCING #
* - TRANSFERS IN (250,000) 0 0 (250,000) 0% # 0
* - TRANSFERS OUT 700,000 0 0 700,000 0% # 0
OTHER FINANCING TOTAL 450,000 0 0 450,000 0% # 0
FUND TOTAL 0 408,839 614,389 (614,389) # 752,456
Key
Varies more than 10% than budget positively
Varies more than 10% than budget negatively
Within 10% of budget
COMMUNITY CENTER BUDGET TO ACTUAL
Jan YTD Jan YTD Jan YTD Jan YTD Jan YTD
Business
Budget Actual Actual Actual Actual Year
Unit
2017 2016 2017 Year Variance Variance %
0673 - ICE ARENA
REVENUES (657,500.00) 11,676.40 (25,800.60) (37,477.00) (320.96)
WAGES AND BENEFITS 286,000.00 13,110.63 19,312.73 6,202.10 47.31
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 391,350.00 7,297.44 1,099.55 (6,197.89) (84.93)
0673 - ICE ARENA 19,850.00 32,084.47 (5,388.32) (37,472.79) (116.79)
0674 & 0678 - COMMUNITY CENTER

REVENUES (385,900.00) (27,132.22) (58,281.62) (31,149.40) 114.81
WAGES AND BENEFITS 566,100.00 34,203.20 36,934.37 2,731.17 7.99
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 455,300.00 15,716.79 5,712.06 (10,004.73) (63.66)
0674 & 0678 - COMMUNITY CENTER 635,500.00 22,787.77 (15,635.19) (38,422.96) (168.61)
2/2/2017 2:33:35 PM Page 1 of 1

C.2.

MEMO
FROM: Nate Burkett

Subject:
Presentation on key findings from the community survey conducted by National Citizen Survey in
November/December 2016 - Early January 2017.
None
Recommendation:
None.
Discussion:
The City of Shakopee has completed a community survey in partnership with National Citizen Survey
(NCS). Surveys were mailed to randomly selected households in November/early December of 2016.
Staff will present key findings.

Budget Impact:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Community Livability Report

Dashboard
Demographic Crosstabs
Geographic Crosstabs
Technical Appendices
Shakopee, MN
Community Livability Report
2016
2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500
Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002
n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780
Contents
About .............................................................................................. 1
Quality of Life in Shakopee ............................................................... 2
Community Characteristics ............................................................... 3
Governance ..................................................................................... 5
Participation .................................................................................... 7
Special Topics.................................................................................. 9
Conclusions ................................................................................... 13
The National Citizen Survey

2001-2017 National Research Center, Inc.
The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
NRC is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing

clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices.
About
The National Citizen Survey (The NCS) report is about the livability of Shakopee. The phrase livable
community is used here to evoke a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where
people do live, but where they want to live.
Great communities are partnerships of the

government, private sector, community-based
organizations and residents, all geographically
connected. The NCS captures residents opinions Residents
within the three pillars of a community
(Community Characteristics, Governance and
Participation) across eight central facets of
community (Safety, Mobility, Natural
Environment, Built Environment, Economy,
Recreation and Wellness, Education and Communities
Enrichment and Community Engagement). Private are Community-
based
sector partnerships organizations
The Community Livability Report provides the
opinions of a representative sample of 410 among...
residents of the City of Shakopee. The margin of
error around any reported percentage is 5% for the
entire sample. The full description of methods used
to garner these opinions can be found in the
Technical Appendices provided under separate
cover. Government
1
Quality of Life in Shakopee
Most residents rated the quality of life in Shakopee as excellent or
Overall Quality of Life
good. This rating was similar to the national benchmark (see Appendix
B of the Technical Appendices provided under separate cover).
Excellent
14%
Shown below are the eight facets of community. The color of each Good
community facet summarizes how residents rated it across the three 67%
sections of the survey that represent the pillars of a community Poor
Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation. When most 3%
ratings across the three pillars were higher than the benchmark, the
color for that facet is the darkest shade; when most ratings were lower Fair
than the benchmark, the color is the lightest shade. A mix of ratings 16%
(higher and lower than the benchmark) results in a color between the
extremes.
In addition to a summary of ratings, the image below includes one or more stars to indicate which community
facets were the most important focus areas for the community. Residents identified Safety and Economy as
priorities for the Shakopee community in the coming two years. Ratings for all facets were positive and similar to
other communities. This overview of the key aspects of community quality provides a quick summary of where
residents see exceptionally strong performance and where performance offers the greatest opportunity for
improvement. Linking quality to importance offers community members and leaders a view into the
characteristics of the community that matter most and that seem to be working best.
Details that support these findings are contained in the remainder of this Livability Report, starting with the
ratings for Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation and ending with results for Shakopees
unique questions.
Legend
Higher than national benchmark
Similar to national benchmark
Lower than national benchmark
Most important
Education
Built
Safety and
Environment
Enrichment
Natural Recreation
Environment and Wellness
Community
Mobility Economy
Engagement
2
Community Characteristics
What makes a community livable, attractive and a place where people want to be?
Overall quality of community life represents the natural ambience, services and amenities that make for an
attractive community. How residents rate their overall quality of life is an indicator of the overall health of a
community. In the case of Shakopee, 85% rated the City as an excellent or good place to live. Respondents ratings
of Shakopee as a place to live were similar to ratings in other communities across the nation.
In addition to rating the City as a place to live, respondents rated several aspects of community quality including
Shakopee as a place to raise children and to retire, their neighborhood as a place to live, the overall image or
reputation of Shakopee and its overall appearance. About three-quarters of residents gave excellent or good
ratings to their neighborhoods and Shakopee as a place to raise children. Around 6 in 10 gave favorable ratings to
Shakopees overall appearance, while about half positively rated Shakopee as a place to retire and the Citys overall
image. All of these aspects of community livability were similar to the national comparison, with the exception of
the overall image of the City, which was lower than what is seen in comparison communities.
Delving deeper into Community Characteristics, survey respondents rated over 40 features of the community
within the eight facets of Community Livability. Overall, results were similar to other communities and most
aspects had positive ratings from a majority of respondents. Around 9 in 10 residents reported feeling safe in their
neighborhoods and in the downtown/commercial area of Shakopee. Within Mobility, about 7 in 10 respondents or
more rated ease of travel by car, public parking and traffic flow as excellent or good, and all of these aspects were
higher than the national benchmark. At least 7 in 10 respondents rated all aspects of Natural Environment in
Shakopee favorably, while at least a majority of residents rated all
Place to Live aspects of Built Environment and Recreation and Wellness favorably.
Aspects of Economy tended to be similar to the benchmark but varied;
Excellent
ratings ranged from 32% excellent or good (vibrancy of the
24% downtown/commercial area) to 69% (Shakopee as a place to visit).
Employment opportunities in the City (63% excellent or good) were
Good rated higher than ratings in comparison communities. Of the
Poor 61% remaining facets, all aspects received positive ratings that were similar
5%
to communities elsewhere with the exception of opportunities to
Fair attend cultural, arts and musical activities, which was rated positively
10% by around 4 in 10 residents and was lower than the national
comparison.
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) Comparison to national benchmark

Higher Similar Lower
79% 77%
68%
56%
52%
Overall image Neighborhood Place to raise children Place to retire Overall appearance
3
Figure 1: Aspects of Community Characteristics
SAFETY
Percent rating positively
(e.g., excellent/good, Overall feeling of safety 79%
very/somewhat safe) Safe in neighborhood 92%
Safe downtown/commercial area 89%
MOBILITY
Comparison to national Overall ease of travel 80%
benchmark Paths and walking trails 69%
Ease of walking 65%
Travel by bicycle 59%
Travel by public transportation 38%
Travel by car 83%
Public parking 73%
Traffic flow 73%
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Overall natural environment 76%
Cleanliness 78%
Air quality 78%
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Overall built environment 61%
New development in Shakopee 63%
Affordable quality housing 55%
Housing options 63%
Public places 62%
ECONOMY
Overall economic health 66%
Vibrant downtown/commercial area 32%
Business and services 57%
Cost of living 51%
Shopping opportunities 45%
Employment opportunities 63%
Place to visit 69%
Place to work 61%
RECREATION AND WELLNESS
Health and wellness 73%
Mental health care 57%
Preventive health services 76%
Health care 75%
Food 59%
Recreational opportunities 68%
Fitness opportunities 62%
EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT
Education and enrichment opportunities 66%
Religious or spiritual events and activities 69%
Cultural/arts/music activities 41%
Adult education 51%
K-12 education 70%
Child care/preschool 55%
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Social events and activities 47%
Neighborliness 54%
Openness and acceptance 58%
Opportunities to participate in community matters 51%
Opportunities to volunteer 59%
4
Governance
How well does the government of Shakopee meet the needs and expectations of its residents?
The overall quality of the services provided by Shakopee as well as the manner in which these services are
provided are a key component of how residents rate their quality of life. The overall quality of services provided by
the City of Shakopee received excellent or good ratings by about 7 in 10 residents, while the services provided by
the Federal Government received positive ratings from about half of respondents. Both of these ratings were
similar to the national benchmark.
Survey respondents also rated various aspects of Shakopees leadership and governance. Around three-quarters of
residents gave favorable ratings to the overall customer service provided by Shakopee employees. At least a
majority of residents positively rated the overall direction that the City was taking, confidence in City government,
the government acting in the best interest of Shakopee, being honest and the government treating all residents
fairly. All aspects measuring government performance were rated similarly to the national benchmark.
Respondents evaluated over 30 individual services and amenities available in Shakopee. Most services and
amenities were rated positively by at least half of respondents and all were similar to or higher than the national
benchmark comparisons. The highest rated services within the facet of Safety were police (85% excellent or good),
fire services (91%) and fire prevention (82%). These aspects were all similar to the national benchmark. About 8 in
10 residents positively rated garbage collection, recycling, storm drainage, sewer services and City parks. These
ratings as well as the remaining services all received ratings similar to the national benchmark with the exception
of storm drainage, which was rated higher than in other communities across the nation.
Overall Quality of City Services

Excellent
17%
Poor
5%
Good
53%
Fair
25%
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) Comparison to national benchmark
73%
61% 58%
53% 55% 55%
47% 48% 49%
Value of Overall Welcoming Confidence Acting in the Being honest Treating all Customer Services
services for direction citizen in City best interest residents service provided by
taxes paid involvement government of Shakopee fairly the Federal
Government
5
Figure 2: Aspects of Governance
Percent rating positively SAFETY

(e.g., excellent/good)
Police 85%
Fire 91%
Crime prevention 75%

Comparison to national
benchmark Fire prevention 82%
Higher Animal control 69%
Similar Emergency preparedness 58%
MOBILITY
Lower
Traffic enforcement 74%
Street repair 56%
Street cleaning 74%
Street lighting 58%
Snow removal 73%
Sidewalk maintenance 68%
Traffic signal timing 59%
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Garbage collection 84%
Recycling 84%
Open space 59%
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Storm drainage 83%
Sewer services 82%
Land use, planning and zoning 49%
Code enforcement 52%
Cable television 46%
ECONOMY
Economic development 66%

City parks 82%
Recreation programs 69%
Recreation centers 66%

Special events 57%
Public information 61%
6
Participation
Are the residents of Shakopee connected to the community and each other?
An engaged community harnesses its most valuable resource, its residents. The connections and trust among
residents, government, businesses and other organizations help to create a sense of community, a shared sense of
membership, belonging and history. Around half of residents gave a positive rating to the overall sense of
community in Shakopee and this level was similar to what was seen in other benchmark communities nationwide.
More than four in five residents reported that they would recommend Shakopee to others and that they would
remain in Shakopee for the next five years, and about 4 in 10 residents reported that they had contacted a City
employee in the last 12 months. All of these ratings were similar to the national benchmark.
The survey included over 30 activities and behaviors for which respondents indicated how often they participated
in or performed each, if at all. Rates of Participation were mixed across the different facets; however, most rates of
Participation were similar to other benchmark communities. Almost all residents had purchased goods or services
in Shakopee and about 9 in 10 reported that they had not been the victim of a crime, recycled at home and they
had talked to or visited with neighbors in the 12 months prior to the survey. About 8 in 10 respondents indicated
that they had not reported a crime, conserved water, visited a City park, ate 5 portions of fruit or vegetables a day,
participated in moderate or vigorous activity, read or watched the local news and voted in local elections. These
levels were similar to the national benchmark. Meanwhile, Shakopee residents were less likely to report that they
had stocked supplies for an emergency, used public transportation instead of driving and attended a City-
sponsored event compared to those in other communities. However, the
Sense of Community proportion of respondents who reported that they had not observed a code
violation in the past 12 months was higher than the national benchmark.
Excellent
8%
Poor Good
11% 45%
Fair
36%
Percent rating positively Comparison to national

(e.g., very/somewhat likely, benchmark
yes)
84% 83%
41%
Recommend Remain in Shakopee Contacted Shakopee

Shakopee employees
7
Figure 3: Aspects of Participation
Percent rating positively SAFETY

(e.g., yes, more than
Stocked supplies for an emergency 21%
once a month,
always/sometimes) Did NOT report a crime 83%
Was NOT the victim of a crime 91%
Comparison to national MOBILITY
benchmark
Used public transportation instead of driving 14%
Higher Carpooled instead of driving alone 39%
Similar Walked or biked instead of driving 53%

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Lower
Conserved water 80%
Made home more energy efficient 78%
Recycled at home 95%
BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Did NOT observe a code violation 65%
NOT under housing cost stress 69%
ECONOMY
Purchased goods or services in Shakopee 94%
Economy will have positive impact on income 30%
Work in Shakopee 40%
Used Shakopee recreation centers 52%
Visited a City park 87%
Ate 5 portions of fruits and vegetables 83%
Participated in moderate or vigorous physical activity 80%
In very good to excellent health 72%
Used Shakopee public libraries 59%
Participated in religious or spiritual activities 40%
Attended a City-sponsored event 41%
Campaigned for an issue, cause or candidate 19%
Contacted Shakopee elected officials 13%
Volunteered 31%
Participated in a club 19%
Talked to or visited with neighbors 91%
Done a favor for a neighbor 76%
Attended a local public meeting 16%
Watched a local public meeting 21%
Read or watched local news 86%
Voted in local elections 86%
8
Special Topics
The City of Shakopee included several questions of special interest on The NCS. An additional line item asked
residents about how often they visited downtown Shakopee. More than 4 in 10 residents reported visiting the
downtown Shakopee area at least once in the 12 months prior to the survey.
Figure 4: Question 8 Additional Line Item - Visited Downtown Shakopee

In the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members done each of the
following in Shakopee?
2 times a week or more 2-4 times a month Once a month or less
Visited downtown Shakopee 13% 33% 48%
The next special interest question inquired about the quality of services provided by Scott County. About two-
thirds of survey participants rated the quality of services provide by Scott County as excellent or good.
Figure 5: Question 11 Additional Line Item -Quality of Services Provided by Scott County
Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?
Excellent Good
Scott County Government 18% 50% 68%
9
The City also asked residents about the Citys approach for the enforcement of residential property codes. About
four in five respondents indicated that they at least somewhat supported a more active/strong approach from the
City towards enforcement of residential property codes.
Figure 6: City Residential Property Code Enforcement

To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of
residential property codes?
Strongly
support
34%
Strongly
oppose
4% Somewhat
support
53%
Somewhat
oppose
9%
Participants were also asked to respond to what would attract them downtown Shakopee more often. About 4 in
10 residents would go to downtown more often if there were more restaurants and slightly fewer reported that
retail would attract them to downtown. Less than 1 in 10 residents chose public amenities as an item that would
attract them to downtown.
Figure 7: Attraction to Downtown Shakopee

Which of these items, if any, would attract you to Downtown Shakopee more often?
Restaurants 41%
Retail 39%
Public events 14%
Public amenities 6%
10
Residents reported using a variety of sources for information about the City. Most residents said that they had
used the City website, Shakopee Valley News and the City Newsletter as a major or minor source of information.
The least cited sources of information included the Star Tribune, talking with City officials and the local
government cable channel.
Figure 8: Sources of Information

Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information
about the City government and its activities, events and services:
Major source Minor source Not a source
City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) 57% 30% 12%
Shakopee Valley News 49% 37% 14%
City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks

35% 48% 17%
and Recreation Activity Brochure)
Word-of-mouth 27% 50% 22%
Email (E-News, eNotifications) 23% 41% 36%
City communications via social media 23% 45% 32%
Star Tribune 17% 33% 51%
Talking with City officials 14% 34% 52%
Local government cable channel (Comcast

9% 30% 61%
16/CenturyLink 240)
11
The final special interest question asked participants to rate the importance of several City issues. A majority rated
redeveloping downtown and enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space within the City
as essential or very important.
Figure 9: Importance of Addressing City Projects

Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and issues will be for the City to address
over the next five years?
Essential Very important
Redeveloping downtown 33% 33% 65%
Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and

19% 39% 58%
open space within the City
Improving access to public transportation 21% 27% 48%
Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and

14% 30% 44%
emergency response times
Improving the riverfront at Huber Park 16% 24% 40%
12
Conclusions
Shakopee residents enjoy a high quality of life.
Most respondents rated the overall quality of life in Shakopee and the City as a place to live as excellent or good.
About 4 in 5 respondents said they would recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asked and planned to
remain living in Shakopee for the next five years. Ratings for features that enhance quality of life, such as
Shakopee as a place to raise children and their neighborhoods as places to live were given positive ratings by about
three-quarters or more of residents. Additionally, a majority of residents rated Shakopees sense of community as
excellent or good.
The Economy is a top priority for residents.
Residents indicated that Economy was an important issue for the community to address in the next two years, and
ratings within this facet varied across the three pillars of community livability. About 6 in 10 respondents or more
gave high marks to the overall economic health of Shakopee, new development in Shakopee, employment
opportunities, Shakopee as a place to visit and a place to work. These ratings were all strong and similar to ratings
given in other communities, with the exception of employment opportunities which was higher than the national
comparison. However, about one-third of participants gave favorable ratings to the vibrancy of Shakopees
downtown/commercial area, which was lower than ratings seen in comparison communities. Almost all
respondents had purchased goods or services in Shakopee, and about 4 in 10 reported working in the City.
Safety is an important and positive feature of the community.
Respondents also indicated that Safety was an important area for the community to focus on in the coming two
years, and ratings within this facet were generally positive and similar to those given in other communities. About
9 in 10 respondents reported feeling safe in their neighborhoods, and 8 in 10 positively rated the overall feeling of
safety in the City. At least 8 in 10 participants gave high marks to police, fire, and fire prevention services; ratings
for all Safety-related services were similar to ratings seen in other communities nationwide. Additionally, about 4
in 5 participants had not reported a crime and about 9 in 10 had not been the victim of a crime in the 12 months
prior to the survey.
13
Shakopee, MN
Dashboard Summary of Findings
2016
n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780
Summary
The National Citizen Survey (The NCS) is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC)
and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). The survey and its administration are
standardized to assure high quality research methods and directly comparable results across The NCS
communities. The NCS captures residents opinions within the three pillars of a community (Community
Characteristics, Governance and Participation) across eight central facets of community (Safety, Mobility, Natural
Environment, Built Environment, Economy, Recreation and Wellness, Education and Enrichment and
Community Engagement). This report summarizes Shakopees performance in the eight facets of community
livability with the General rating as a summary of results from the overarching questions not shown within any
of the eight facets. The Overall represents the community pillar in its entirety (the eight facets and general).
By summarizing resident ratings across the eight facets and three pillars of a livable community, a picture of
Shakopees community livability emerges. Below, the color of each community facet summarizes how residents
rated each of the pillars that support it Community Characteristics, Governance and Participation. When most
ratings were higher than the benchmark, the color is the darkest shade; when most ratings were lower than the
benchmark, the color is the lightest shade. A mix of ratings (higher and lower than the benchmark) results in a
color between the extremes.
Broadly, Shakopee residents tended to give positive ratings to most aspects of community livability and these
ratings were similar to ratings given in comparison communities. However, levels of Participation in Built
Environment tended to be higher in Shakopee than seen elsewhere.
Figure 1: Dashboard Summary

Community Characteristics Governance Participation
Higher Similar Lower Higher Similar Lower Higher Similar Lower
Overall 4 45 3 1 36 0 1 32 3
General 0 6 1 0 3 0 0 3 0
Safety 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 2 1
Mobility 3 5 0 0 7 0 0 2 1
Natural Environment 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 0
Built Environment 0 5 0 1 4 0 1 1 0
Economy 1 6 1 0 1 0 0 3 0
Recreation and Wellness 0 7 0 0 3 0 0 5 0
Education and Enrichment 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 2 1
Community Engagement 0 5 0 0 8 0 0 11 0
Legend
Higher
Similar
Lower
1
Figure 2: Detailed Dashboard

Percent Percent Percent
Community Characteristics Benchmark Governance Benchmark Participation Benchmark
positive positive positive
Overall appearance 68% Customer service 73% Recommend Shakopee 84%
Overall quality of life 81% Services provided by Shakopee 71% Remain in Shakopee 83%
Place to retire 52% Services provided by the Federal 49% Contacted Shakopee employees 41%
General
Government
Place to raise children 77%
Place to live 85%
Neighborhood 79%
Overall image 56%
Overall feeling of safety 79% Police 85% Was NOT the victim of a crime 91%
Safe in neighborhood 92% Crime prevention 75% Did NOT report a crime 83%
Safe downtown/commercial area 89% Fire 91% Stocked supplies for an emergency 21%
Safety
Fire prevention 82%

Emergency preparedness 58%
Animal control 69%
Traffic flow 73% Traffic enforcement 74% Carpooled instead of driving alone 39%
Travel by car 83% Street repair 56% Walked or biked instead of driving 53%
Travel by bicycle 59% Street cleaning 74% Used public transportation instead 14%
Mobility
of driving
Ease of walking 65% Street lighting 58%
Travel by public transportation 38% Snow removal 73%
Overall ease of travel 80% Sidewalk maintenance 68%
Public parking 73% Traffic signal timing 59%
Paths and walking trails 69%
Overall natural environment 76% Garbage collection 84% Recycled at home 95%
Environment
Air quality 78% Recycling 84% Conserved water 80%

Natural
Cleanliness 78% Open space 59% Made home more energy efficient 78%
New development in Shakopee 63% Sewer services 82% NOT experiencing housing cost 69%
stress
Environment
Affordable quality housing 55% Storm drainage 83% Did NOT observe a code violation 65%
Built
Housing options 63% Land use, planning and zoning 49%

Overall built environment 61% Code enforcement 52%
Public places 62% Cable television 46%
Legend
Much higher Higher Similar Lower Much lower * Not available
2
Percent Percent Percent

Community Characteristics Benchmark Governance Benchmark Participation Benchmark
positive positive positive
Overall economic health 66% Economic development 66% Economy will have positive impact on 30%
income
Shopping opportunities 45% Purchased goods or services in 94%
Shakopee
Economy
Employment opportunities 63% Work in Shakopee 40%

Place to visit 69%
Cost of living 51%
Vibrant downtown/commercial area 32%
Place to work 61%
Business and services 57%
Fitness opportunities 62% City parks 82% In very good to excellent health 72%
Recreational opportunities 68% Recreation centers 66% Used Shakopee recreation centers 52%
Recreation and
Health care 75% Recreation programs 69% Visited a City park 87%
Wellness
Food 59% Ate 5 portions of fruits and vegetables 83%

Mental health care 57% Participated in moderate or vigorous 80%
physical activity
Health and wellness 73%
Preventive health services 76%
K-12 education 70% Special events 57% Used Shakopee public libraries 59%
Cultural/arts/music activities 41% Participated in religious or spiritual 40%
Education and
activities
Enrichment
Child care/preschool 55% Attended a City-sponsored event 41%

Religious or spiritual events and 69%
activities
Adult education 51%
Overall education and enrichment 66%
Opportunities to participate in 51% Public information 61% Sense of community 53%
community matters
Opportunities to volunteer 59% Overall direction 61% Voted in local elections 86%
Community Engagement
Openness and acceptance 58% Value of services for taxes paid 47% Talked to or visited with neighbors 91%
Social events and activities 47% Welcoming citizen involvement 48% Attended a local public meeting 16%
Neighborliness 54% Confidence in City government 53% Watched a local public meeting 21%
Acting in the best interest of 55% Volunteered 31%
Shakopee
Being honest 55% Participated in a club 19%
Treating all residents fairly 58% Campaigned for an issue, cause or 19%
candidate
Contacted Shakopee elected officials 13%
Read or watched local news 86%
Done a favor for a neighbor 76%
Legend
Much higher Higher Similar Lower Much lower * Not available
3
Shakopee, MN
Comparisons by Demographic Subgroups
2016
n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780
Summary
communities. This report discusses differences in opinion of survey respondents by age, sex, race/ethnicity,
housing tenure (rent or own) and housing unit type (detached or attached).
Responses in the following tables show only the proportion of respondents giving a certain answer; for example,
the percent of respondents who rated the quality of life as excellent or good, or the percent of respondents who
attended a public meeting more than once a month. ANOVA and chi-square tests of significance were applied to
these comparisons of survey questions. A p-value of 0.05 or less indicates that there is less than a 5% probability
that differences observed between subgroups are due to chance; or in other words, a greater than 95% probability
that the differences observed are real. Where differences were statistically significant, they have been shaded
grey.
The margin of error for this report is generally no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any
given percent reported for the entire sample (410 completed surveys). For subgroups of responses, the margin of
error increases because the sample size for the subgroup is smaller. For subgroups of approximately 100
respondents, the margin of error is plus or minus 10 percentage points.
Notable differences between demographic subgroups included the following:
Within the pillar of Community Characteristics, residents who were female, identified as white alone, not
Hispanic, owned their homes or lived in detached housing tended to rate their neighborhood as a place to live
higher than their peers. Similarly, residents who were white alone, not Hispanic, owned their homes or lived
in detached housing rated Shakopee as a place to live more favorably than their counterparts. Where
difference where significant, renters tended to rate aspects of Safety less positively than those who owned
their homes. Residents who were 35 and older, who identified as Hispanic and/or another race, who rented or
lived in attached housing tended to rate the cleanliness of Shakopee less favorably than their peers.
Resident opinion by demographic groups tended to vary across facets of Governance. Where differences were
significant, younger residents between the ages of 18-34 tended to rate general aspects of Governance higher
than older residents. Meanwhile, residents who were 55 or older tended to rate aspects of Natural
Environment such as garbage collection and recycling more favorably than younger residents. Residents
identifying as White alone, not Hispanic, who owned their homes or lived in detached housing tended to give
higher ratings to economic development than those identifying as Hispanic and/or other race, who rented or
lived in attached housing.
Several significant differences were noted among resident Participation in City events or activities. White
alone, not Hispanic residents who owned their home or lived in detached housing were more likely to report
they would recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asked. Residents who were between the ages of
35-54 or who were female tended to report they had been the victim of a crime more so than their
counterparts. Younger residents between the ages of 18-34 were significantly less likely to have observed a
code violation compared to older residents. Hispanic and/or other race identifying residents or those who
were between the ages of 35-54 were more likely to report they worked in Shakopee compared to their peers.
Homeowners were more likely to have reported engaging with the community than were renters, where
significance was noted.
Hispanic and/or other race respondents tended to rate the quality of overall natural environment in
Shakopee, health and wellness opportunities in the City and sense of community as important community
focus areas more so than their counterparts. Female residents or those who rented their home tended to
provide more support for the City enforcing residential property codes than their male or home-owning
counterparts. Additionally, females tended to place higher importance than their male peers on improving
access to public transportation and construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency
response times, as it related to addressing City projects in the next five years.
1
Table 1: Community Characteristics - General

Housing
Age Sex Race/ethnicity tenure Housing unit type
Percent rating positively (e.g., 18- 35- White alone, not Hispanic and/or other
excellent/good) 34 54 55+ Female Male Hispanic race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
The overall quality of life in Shakopee 85% 81% 77% 85% 78% 84% 70% 76% 82% 85% 76% 81%
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 49% 58% 62% 58% 53% 57% 51% 56% 55% 55% 57% 56%
Shakopee as a place to live 86% 85% 84% 87% 83% 88% 74% 71% 89% 90% 78% 85%
Your neighborhood as a place to live 78% 78% 82% 83% 75% 81% 71% 67% 82% 88% 65% 79%
Shakopee as a place to raise children 73% 78% 81% 79% 75% 79% 69% 58% 81% 85% 63% 77%
Shakopee as a place to retire 60% 41% 62% 54% 49% 51% 55% 51% 52% 51% 53% 52%
Overall appearance of Shakopee 69% 65% 71% 69% 66% 72% 49% 50% 72% 74% 59% 68%
Table 2: Community Characteristics - Safety

Housing
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18- 35- White alone, not Hispanic and/or
very/somewhat safe) 34 54 55+ Female Male Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 82% 77% 79% 80% 80% 80% 76% 71% 81% 81% 77% 79%
In your neighborhood during the day 97% 90% 88% 93% 92% 93% 92% 90% 93% 94% 90% 92%
In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during
the day 90% 89% 89% 89% 91% 90% 85% 81% 91% 91% 86% 89%
Table 3: Community Characteristics - Mobility

Housing
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually
have to visit 81% 78% 83% 80% 79% 81% 76% 71% 82% 83% 75% 80%
Traffic flow on major streets 81% 65% 75% 74% 71% 74% 65% 64% 75% 78% 65% 73%
Ease of public parking 79% 70% 69% 71% 74% 76% 61% 59% 76% 77% 67% 73%
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 87% 79% 83% 83% 82% 88% 64% 62% 88% 90% 72% 83%
Ease of travel by public transportation in
Shakopee 32% 43% 36% 36% 39% 43% 24% 26% 42% 44% 27% 38%
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 56% 59% 63% 66% 52% 59% 58% 61% 58% 63% 53% 59%
Ease of walking in Shakopee 61% 67% 72% 70% 61% 68% 57% 54% 69% 72% 55% 65%
Availability of paths and walking trails 69% 66% 77% 73% 65% 73% 55% 62% 71% 75% 61% 69%
2
Table 4: Community Characteristics - Natural Environment

Housing
Quality of overall natural environment in
Shakopee 78% 72% 82% 82% 71% 78% 69% 77% 76% 79% 72% 76%
Air quality 81% 77% 77% 78% 78% 82% 63% 66% 81% 83% 71% 78%
Cleanliness of Shakopee 84% 72% 79% 79% 76% 80% 68% 69% 80% 83% 70% 78%
Table 5: Community Characteristics - Built Environment

Housing
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, 18- 35- White alone, Hispanic and/or
very/somewhat safe) 34 54 55+ Female Male not Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall
design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) 61% 60% 63% 65% 57% 63% 51% 58% 61% 62% 60% 61%
Public places where people want to spend time 61% 61% 71% 67% 59% 65% 54% 56% 64% 66% 58% 62%
Variety of housing options 68% 61% 60% 60% 66% 65% 55% 40% 69% 70% 54% 63%
Availability of affordable quality housing 63% 53% 45% 50% 60% 60% 35% 21% 64% 66% 39% 55%
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 69% 62% 55% 65% 63% 64% 58% 52% 65% 65% 60% 63%
Table 6: Community Characteristics - Economy

Housing
Overall economic health of Shakopee 66% 68% 65% 67% 66% 70% 53% 62% 67% 68% 63% 66%
Shakopee as a place to work 48% 63% 80% 70% 53% 66% 46% 61% 61% 61% 62% 61%
Shakopee as a place to visit 65% 70% 73% 75% 63% 69% 66% 77% 66% 68% 70% 69%
Employment opportunities 62% 61% 70% 61% 65% 67% 49% 50% 67% 70% 53% 63%
Shopping opportunities 49% 39% 51% 42% 50% 46% 40% 42% 46% 44% 46% 45%
Cost of living in Shakopee 58% 52% 39% 49% 54% 56% 36% 37% 55% 57% 43% 51%
Overall quality of business and service
establishments in Shakopee 63% 54% 54% 57% 57% 59% 47% 57% 57% 59% 53% 57%
Vibrant downtown/commercial areas 30% 34% 33% 31% 34% 35% 20% 31% 33% 34% 29% 32%
3
Table 7: Community Characteristics - Recreation and Wellness

Housing
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 69% 74% 77% 81% 66% 75% 63% 67% 74% 74% 71% 73%
Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes
and paths or trails, etc.) 62% 61% 65% 66% 58% 64% 53% 59% 63% 66% 57% 62%
Recreational opportunities 68% 67% 70% 68% 68% 73% 48% 65% 69% 71% 63% 68%
Availability of affordable quality food 62% 54% 62% 61% 56% 62% 46% 54% 60% 60% 57% 59%
Availability of affordable quality health care 74% 75% 73% 78% 72% 78% 62% 63% 78% 82% 63% 75%
Availability of preventive health services 80% 74% 74% 77% 75% 79% 65% 67% 78% 79% 71% 76%
Availability of affordable quality mental health care 66% 51% 57% 57% 56% 61% 40% 51% 58% 63% 49% 57%
Table 8: Community Characteristics - Education and Enrichment

Housing
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 67% 61% 72% 68% 63% 70% 47% 63% 66% 66% 64% 66%
Availability of affordable quality child
care/preschool 52% 55% 65% 60% 50% 58% 50% 51% 56% 60% 47% 55%
K-12 education 67% 70% 73% 73% 67% 74% 55% 55% 73% 74% 62% 70%
Adult educational opportunities 52% 48% 56% 51% 53% 53% 44% 55% 50% 55% 46% 51%
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music
activities 43% 42% 38% 40% 44% 42% 38% 30% 44% 45% 36% 41%
Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual
events and activities 70% 63% 79% 65% 71% 74% 47% 63% 70% 72% 63% 69%
Table 9: Community Characteristics - Community Engagement

Housing
Opportunities to participate in social events and
activities 38% 49% 55% 46% 47% 50% 31% 32% 50% 53% 37% 47%
Opportunities to volunteer 46% 58% 75% 57% 60% 64% 36% 40% 63% 64% 50% 59%
Opportunities to participate in community matters 42% 54% 58% 46% 57% 56% 33% 31% 56% 54% 46% 51%
Openness and acceptance of the community toward
people of diverse backgrounds 66% 54% 54% 57% 59% 60% 52% 45% 61% 62% 52% 58%
Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee 51% 55% 57% 56% 51% 55% 51% 43% 56% 61% 43% 54%
4
Table 10: Governance - General

Housing
18- 35- White alone, not Hispanic and/or
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) 34 54 55+ Female Male Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
The City of Shakopee 73% 68% 75% 76% 65% 74% 60% 64% 73% 75% 65% 71%
The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 57% 40% 49% 50% 46% 50% 38% 47% 47% 50% 43% 47%
The overall direction that Shakopee is taking 71% 56% 54% 65% 57% 62% 57% 58% 62% 65% 55% 61%
The job Shakopee government does at welcoming
citizen involvement 51% 43% 59% 50% 46% 51% 39% 45% 49% 49% 48% 48%
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 65% 46% 51% 62% 46% 52% 61% 67% 50% 53% 55% 53%
Generally acting in the best interest of the community 74% 43% 54% 60% 51% 57% 52% 60% 54% 57% 53% 55%
Being honest 65% 48% 54% 59% 50% 57% 48% 59% 54% 56% 54% 55%
Treating all residents fairly 72% 48% 57% 59% 57% 61% 48% 56% 58% 62% 52% 58%
Overall customer service by Shakopee employees
(police, receptionists, planners, etc.) 74% 70% 81% 75% 71% 79% 50% 60% 76% 78% 65% 73%
The Federal Government 54% 43% 52% 61% 36% 45% 59% 49% 48% 47% 50% 49%
Scott County Government 69% 68% 68% 78% 59% 70% 65% 66% 69% 69% 67% 68%
Table 11: Governance - Safety

Housing
18- 35- White alone, Hispanic and/or
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) 34 54 55+ Female Male not Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Police services 83% 84% 91% 86% 84% 88% 73% 71% 89% 92% 74% 85%
Fire services 85% 91% 98% 92% 89% 95% 77% 74% 95% 97% 81% 91%
Crime prevention 76% 70% 81% 72% 76% 77% 65% 68% 76% 76% 72% 75%
Fire prevention and education 87% 79% 85% 83% 81% 84% 75% 70% 85% 86% 77% 82%
Animal control 77% 69% 61% 70% 69% 69% 74% 73% 68% 71% 66% 69%
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the
community for natural disasters or other emergency
situations) 60% 53% 67% 58% 58% 62% 46% 47% 61% 66% 47% 58%
Table 12: Governance - Mobility

Housing
Traffic enforcement 90% 65% 70% 81% 67% 75% 69% 79% 73% 77% 69% 74%
Street repair 64% 49% 58% 54% 57% 56% 52% 38% 59% 59% 49% 56%
Street cleaning 78% 71% 72% 79% 68% 74% 73% 70% 74% 74% 72% 74%
Street lighting 55% 56% 66% 61% 55% 61% 47% 53% 59% 62% 51% 58%
5
Housing
Snow removal 75% 68% 81% 75% 72% 77% 60% 69% 74% 76% 69% 73%
Sidewalk maintenance 75% 65% 67% 70% 67% 73% 54% 62% 71% 72% 63% 68%
Traffic signal timing 70% 51% 58% 64% 56% 60% 56% 56% 60% 61% 56% 59%
Table 13: Governance - Natural Environment

Housing
Garbage collection 79% 84% 92% 86% 83% 86% 74% 78% 85% 86% 80% 84%
Recycling 80% 83% 94% 88% 81% 85% 82% 86% 83% 84% 84% 84%
Shakopee open space 63% 59% 56% 60% 59% 61% 55% 50% 61% 63% 54% 59%
Table 14: Governance - Built Environment

Housing
Storm drainage 91% 77% 85% 85% 83% 85% 78% 83% 83% 87% 76% 83%
Sewer services 81% 81% 88% 84% 82% 86% 69% 69% 85% 89% 71% 82%
Land use, planning and zoning 52% 48% 48% 55% 45% 51% 43% 49% 49% 51% 46% 49%
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned
buildings, etc.) 63% 47% 47% 52% 51% 51% 56% 59% 50% 49% 57% 52%
Cable television 51% 42% 47% 45% 48% 50% 33% 41% 47% 46% 46% 46%
Table 15: Governance - Economy

Housing
Economic development 66% 66% 65% 64% 67% 69% 54% 51% 69% 71% 57% 66%
6
Table 16: Governance - Recreation and Wellness

Housing
City parks 78% 83% 88% 83% 81% 84% 73% 68% 85% 86% 75% 82%
Recreation programs or classes 63% 68% 83% 70% 68% 70% 64% 62% 71% 74% 62% 69%
Recreation centers or facilities 61% 66% 74% 67% 63% 68% 58% 57% 68% 71% 58% 66%
Table 17: Governance - Education and Enrichment

Housing
City-sponsored special events 62% 55% 54% 58% 55% 58% 53% 49% 58% 62% 49% 57%
Table 18: Governance - Community Engagement

Housing
Public information services 64% 59% 64% 61% 61% 63% 56% 49% 64% 67% 52% 61%
Table 19: Participation General

Housing
Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more 18- 35- White alone, not Hispanic and/or
than once a month, yes) 34 54 55+ Female Male Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Sense of community 52% 53% 55% 57% 50% 56% 40% 56% 52% 55% 51% 53%
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 87% 84% 82% 86% 83% 89% 68% 67% 89% 89% 78% 84%
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 80% 87% 80% 85% 81% 84% 80% 67% 87% 89% 74% 83%
Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone,
email or web) for help or information 36% 42% 49% 44% 39% 39% 49% 40% 42% 43% 39% 41%
Table 20: Participation - Safety

Housing
Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, 18- 35- White alone, not Hispanic and/or
more than once a month, yes) 34 54 55+ Female Male Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Was NOT the victim of a crime 97% 86% 90% 88% 94% 90% 91% 85% 92% 91% 89% 91%
Did NOT report a crime 87% 79% 83% 83% 83% 82% 87% 85% 82% 83% 83% 83%
Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency 15% 25% 23% 17% 24% 19% 29% 25% 20% 21% 21% 21%
7
Table 21: Participation - Mobility

Housing
Walked or biked instead of driving 53% 58% 43% 55% 52% 51% 61% 53% 53% 53% 53% 53%
Carpooled with other adults or children instead of
driving alone 37% 45% 29% 47% 30% 38% 42% 41% 38% 41% 36% 39%
Used bus or other public transportation instead of
driving 17% 14% 10% 17% 12% 11% 26% 27% 11% 11% 19% 14%
Table 22: Participation - Natural Environment

Housing
Recycle at home 90% 99% 95% 94% 96% 98% 85% 81% 99% 98% 90% 95%
Made efforts to make your home more energy
efficient 75% 84% 70% 76% 80% 78% 79% 72% 80% 80% 75% 78%
Made efforts to conserve water 81% 83% 74% 78% 83% 79% 87% 79% 81% 81% 80% 80%
Table 23: Participation - Built Environment

Housing
NOT under housing cost stress 70% 73% 61% 67% 71% 74% 53% 50% 74% 71% 66% 69%
Did NOT observe a code violation 80% 57% 58% 66% 64% 67% 61% 71% 64% 62% 71% 65%
Table 24: Participation - Economy

Housing
Purchase goods or services from a business located in
Shakopee 94% 94% 97% 95% 94% 96% 87% 91% 95% 96% 92% 94%
Economy will have positive impact on income 32% 28% 29% 25% 34% 32% 20% 21% 32% 35% 22% 30%
Work in Shakopee 39% 47% 23% 41% 38% 35% 58% 47% 38% 40% 39% 40%
8
Table 25: Participation - Recreation and Wellness

Housing
Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services 46% 63% 39% 55% 49% 53% 47% 38% 56% 59% 42% 52%
Visited a neighborhood park or City park 89% 94% 67% 85% 88% 87% 88% 79% 89% 91% 81% 87%
Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day 84% 86% 73% 84% 81% 83% 83% 72% 86% 86% 78% 83%
Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity 73% 89% 76% 82% 79% 82% 75% 75% 82% 82% 78% 80%
Reported being in "very good" or "excellent" health 82% 75% 49% 68% 76% 75% 64% 55% 77% 78% 63% 72%
Table 26: Participation - Education and Enrichment

Housing
Used Shakopee public libraries or their services 55% 66% 54% 64% 56% 59% 60% 67% 58% 58% 63% 59%
Participated in religious or spiritual activities in
Shakopee 27% 47% 49% 37% 42% 41% 35% 33% 42% 48% 29% 40%
Attended a City-sponsored event 37% 51% 28% 41% 42% 42% 42% 27% 45% 49% 30% 41%
Table 27: Participation - Community Engagement

Housing
Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more 18- 35- White alone, not Hispanic and/or
than once a month, yes) 34 54 55+ Female Male Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or
candidate 11% 22% 29% 19% 19% 21% 15% 13% 21% 23% 14% 19%
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone,
email or web) to express your opinion 3% 16% 23% 11% 15% 12% 14% 5% 15% 15% 10% 13%
Volunteered your time to some group/activity in
Shakopee 16% 42% 32% 32% 30% 33% 22% 9% 36% 38% 20% 31%
Participated in a club 10% 25% 23% 22% 16% 18% 25% 11% 21% 24% 13% 19%
Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors 88% 92% 94% 89% 93% 96% 75% 79% 94% 96% 84% 91%
Done a favor for a neighbor 64% 81% 86% 75% 76% 79% 63% 67% 78% 80% 70% 76%
Attended a local public meeting 6% 22% 19% 15% 17% 16% 13% 9% 18% 17% 14% 16%
Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting 10% 26% 28% 24% 18% 19% 28% 24% 20% 22% 19% 21%
Read or watch local news (via television, paper,
computer, etc.) 82% 86% 91% 89% 82% 88% 80% 90% 85% 86% 86% 86%
Vote in local elections 74% 91% 95% 90% 83% 89% 74% 83% 87% 90% 80% 86%
9
Table 28: Community Focus Areas

Housing
18- 35- White alone, Hispanic and/or
Percent rating positively (e.g., essential/very important) 34 54 55+ Female Male not Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 91% 94% 97% 98% 89% 93% 97% 100% 92% 93% 95% 94%
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to
visit 69% 79% 81% 79% 73% 75% 79% 86% 73% 71% 82% 76%
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee 80% 79% 74% 76% 81% 75% 91% 79% 78% 77% 81% 78%
design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) 80% 79% 74% 79% 79% 77% 84% 85% 76% 75% 83% 78%
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 73% 75% 81% 76% 75% 73% 86% 74% 76% 73% 79% 75%
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 77% 80% 76% 80% 76% 77% 85% 82% 77% 76% 81% 78%
Overall economic health of Shakopee 87% 93% 88% 87% 93% 91% 87% 78% 93% 93% 86% 90%
Sense of community 85% 84% 75% 83% 80% 79% 96% 88% 81% 82% 83% 82%
Table 29: Question 8 Additional Line Item - Visited Downtown Shakopee

Age Sex Race/ethnicity Housing tenure Housing unit type
18-34 35-54 55+ Female Male White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Visited downtown Shakopee 95% 93% 93% 93% 93% 94% 92% 95% 93% 94% 93% 93%
Table 30: City Residential Property Code Enforcement

Housing
Hispanic
18- 35- White alone, and/or other
34 54 55+ Female Male not Hispanic race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
To what degree would you support or oppose a more
active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of
residential property codes? 85% 84% 93% 95% 79% 86% 89% 95% 84% 85% 88% 86%
10
Table 31: Sources of Information

Housing
Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of Age Sex Race/ethnicity tenure Housing unit type
the following to be for obtaining information about the City White Hispanic
government and its activities, events and services:(Percent rating as 18- 35- alone, not and/or
"Major" or "Minor source"). 34 54 55+ Female Male Hispanic other race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) 85% 92% 80% 87% 88% 89% 84% 72% 92% 92% 81% 88%
Shakopee Valley News 81% 90% 85% 86% 85% 84% 90% 84% 86% 87% 83% 86%
Star Tribune 50% 48% 52% 52% 48% 46% 64% 63% 46% 45% 56% 49%
Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240) 29% 41% 49% 36% 40% 35% 53% 56% 33% 35% 44% 39%
City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation
Activity Brochure) 81% 84% 83% 82% 83% 83% 81% 88% 81% 82% 85% 83%
Talking with City officials 37% 53% 59% 46% 50% 48% 51% 31% 53% 56% 37% 48%
City communications via social media 71% 71% 57% 72% 63% 67% 74% 73% 67% 70% 66% 68%
Word-of-mouth 79% 79% 73% 78% 77% 79% 75% 80% 77% 79% 76% 78%
Email (E-News, eNotifications) 65% 65% 60% 67% 62% 65% 62% 59% 66% 67% 59% 64%
Table 32: Importance of Addressing City Projects

Housing
Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following Hispanic
projects and issues will be for the City to address over the next 18- 35- White alone, and/or other
five years? (Percent rating as "Essential" or "Very important"). 34 54 55+ Female Male not Hispanic race Rent Own Detached Attached Overall
Redeveloping downtown 69% 65% 61% 68% 64% 63% 80% 88% 60% 63% 71% 65%
Improving the riverfront at Huber Park 46% 40% 30% 38% 43% 36% 58% 48% 38% 39% 42% 40%
Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open
space within the City 59% 60% 54% 55% 62% 55% 73% 56% 59% 60% 56% 58%
Improving access to public transportation 49% 44% 59% 58% 40% 42% 74% 84% 39% 38% 65% 48%
Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and
emergency response times 45% 43% 46% 53% 36% 43% 51% 56% 41% 42% 48% 44%
11
Shakopee, MN
Comparisons by Geographic Subgroups
2016
n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780
Summary
communities. This report discusses differences in opinion of survey respondents by subarea.
Responses in the following tables show only the proportion of respondents giving a certain answer; for example,
the percent of respondents who rated the quality of life as excellent or good, or the percent of respondents who
attended a public meeting more than once a month. ANOVA and chi-square tests of significance were applied to
these comparisons of survey questions. A p-value of 0.05 or less indicates that there is less than a 5% probability
that differences observed between subarea are due to chance; or in other words, a greater than 95% probability
that the differences observed are real. Where differences were statistically significant, they have been shaded
grey.
The margin of error for this report is generally no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any
given percent reported for the entire sample (410 completed surveys). For each subarea (subarea 1, subarea 2,
subarea 3 and subarea 4), the margin of error rises to approximately plus or minus 13 percentage points since
sample sizes were approximately 102 for subarea 1, 156 for subarea 2, 96 for subarea 3 and 56 for subarea 4.
Notable differences between subareas included the following:
Residents living in subarea 1 tended to rate Shakopee as a place to live lower than those living in other
subareas, while residents of subareas 1 and 2 tended to give lower ratings to Shakopee as a place to raise
children than residents elsewhere. Where differences were significant, residents living in subarea 4 tended to
rate aspects of Built Environment higher than their counterparts. A vast majority of subarea 4 residents
favorably rated the availability of affordable quality health care in Shakopee.
In Governance, subarea 4 residents were more likely to positively rate the services provided by the City of
Shakopee and the job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement than their peers.
Additionally, where significance was noted, subarea 4 residents tended to rate aspects of Mobility higher than
those living in the other subareas. Roughly half of subarea 1 residents rated the economic development in
Shakopee favorably which was lower than ratings given in other subareas.
Within the pillar of Participation, subarea 1 residents reported being less likely to recommend living in
Shakopee to someone who asked that residents living in the other four subareas. Respondents residing in
subarea 4 were significantly more likely to report that they had carpooled with other adults or children instead
of driving alone and to report being in very good or excellent health compared to their counterparts.
When asked about their support or opposition to the City implementing a stronger approach to code
enforcement, subarea 1 and 2 residents were more likely to be in favor compared to the other three subareas.
Sources of information were utilized differently by different subareas; subarea 1 residents used the City
website less frequently as a source of information compared to their peers, while subarea 2 residents utilized
the Star Tribune as more of source than those in the other subareas. Also, subarea 3 reported the local
government cable channel was less of a source of information for them compared to residents living elsewhere
in the City. Differences were also seen among residents when asked about the importance of addressing
certain projects and issues over the next five years. Subareas 2 and 4 residents tended to be more in favor of
the City improving the riverfront at Huber Park compared to their counterparts and subareas 1 and 2
residents were more likely to report that improving access to public transportation was very important or
essential compared to residents in other subareas.
1
Table 1: Community Characteristics - General

Subarea
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) Subarea 1 Subarea 2 Subarea 3 Subarea 4 Overall
The overall quality of life in Shakopee 76% 82% 81% 86% 81%
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 51% 55% 53% 72% 56%
Shakopee as a place to live 71% 89% 88% 89% 85%
Your neighborhood as a place to live 71% 78% 82% 87% 79%
Shakopee as a place to raise children 68% 72% 87% 87% 77%
Shakopee as a place to retire 55% 51% 46% 56% 52%
Overall appearance of Shakopee 61% 71% 65% 70% 68%
Table 2: Community Characteristics - Safety

Subarea
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good, very/somewhat Subarea Subarea Subarea Subarea
safe) 1 2 3 4 Overall
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 75% 80% 79% 81% 79%
In your neighborhood during the day 91% 91% 97% 90% 92%
In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during the day 88% 88% 87% 95% 89%
Table 3: Community Characteristics - Mobility

Subarea
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit 75% 85% 75% 77% 80%
Traffic flow on major streets 75% 73% 72% 67% 73%
Ease of public parking 59% 74% 82% 76% 73%
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 79% 78% 92% 87% 83%
Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee 36% 32% 46% 48% 38%
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 65% 57% 56% 64% 59%
Ease of walking in Shakopee 61% 69% 60% 73% 65%
Availability of paths and walking trails 70% 71% 66% 67% 69%
Table 4: Community Characteristics - Natural Environment

Subarea
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee 68% 81% 73% 76% 76%
Air quality 74% 80% 77% 83% 78%
Cleanliness of Shakopee 84% 71% 82% 81% 78%
Table 5: Community Characteristics - Built Environment

Subarea
design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) 46% 66% 58% 74% 61%
Public places where people want to spend time 64% 64% 60% 58% 62%
Variety of housing options 43% 69% 63% 81% 63%
Availability of affordable quality housing 38% 57% 59% 72% 55%
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 57% 65% 60% 73% 63%
2
Table 6: Community Characteristics - Economy

Subarea
Overall economic health of Shakopee 64% 65% 68% 72% 66%
Shakopee as a place to work 77% 58% 52% 69% 61%
Shakopee as a place to visit 70% 71% 63% 71% 69%
Employment opportunities 60% 67% 54% 72% 63%
Shopping opportunities 42% 51% 39% 42% 45%
Cost of living in Shakopee 45% 50% 53% 66% 51%
Overall quality of business and service establishments in
Shakopee 59% 60% 50% 57% 57%
Vibrant downtown/commercial areas 41% 33% 22% 37% 32%
Table 7: Community Characteristics - Recreation and Wellness

Subarea
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 72% 71% 76% 76% 73%
Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or
trails, etc.) 66% 65% 51% 65% 62%
Recreational opportunities 73% 68% 66% 64% 68%
Availability of affordable quality food 57% 57% 61% 65% 59%
Availability of affordable quality health care 67% 74% 75% 94% 75%
Availability of preventive health services 73% 73% 77% 93% 76%
Availability of affordable quality mental health care 51% 60% 52% 66% 57%
Table 8: Community Characteristics - Education and Enrichment

Subarea
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 66% 64% 66% 69% 66%
Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool 56% 49% 59% 71% 55%
K-12 education 70% 67% 71% 76% 70%
Adult educational opportunities 53% 54% 43% 51% 51%
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 37% 48% 34% 43% 41%
Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and
activities 71% 67% 68% 73% 69%
Table 9: Community Characteristics - Community Engagement

Subarea
Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 47% 46% 47% 48% 47%
Opportunities to volunteer 57% 51% 70% 63% 59%
Opportunities to participate in community matters 41% 46% 59% 67% 51%
Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of
diverse backgrounds 51% 54% 71% 63% 58%
Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee 48% 51% 65% 55% 54%
3
Table 10: Governance - General

Subarea
Subarea Subarea Subarea Subarea
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) 1 2 3 4 Overall
The City of Shakopee 65% 74% 63% 84% 71%
The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 55% 50% 35% 47% 47%
The overall direction that Shakopee is taking 57% 62% 57% 73% 61%
The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen
involvement 37% 57% 37% 63% 48%
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 54% 56% 42% 63% 53%
Generally acting in the best interest of the community 54% 60% 45% 59% 55%
Being honest 46% 59% 51% 65% 55%
Treating all residents fairly 52% 60% 54% 68% 58%
Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police,
receptionists, planners, etc.) 67% 74% 69% 88% 73%
The Federal Government 48% 51% 43% 53% 49%
Scott County Government 68% 71% 61% 73% 68%
Table 11: Governance - Safety

Subarea
Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) 1 2 3 4 Overall
Police services 84% 85% 83% 93% 85%
Fire services 82% 94% 93% 94% 91%
Crime prevention 69% 74% 75% 85% 75%
Fire prevention and education 89% 81% 78% 83% 82%
Animal control 60% 66% 77% 81% 69%
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community
for natural disasters or other emergency situations) 49% 63% 56% 66% 58%
Table 12: Governance - Mobility

Subarea
Traffic enforcement 76% 76% 67% 73% 74%
Street repair 48% 56% 50% 78% 56%
Street cleaning 70% 76% 67% 83% 74%
Street lighting 57% 55% 54% 79% 58%
Snow removal 71% 72% 74% 82% 73%
Sidewalk maintenance 61% 67% 69% 83% 68%
Traffic signal timing 68% 52% 57% 74% 59%
Table 13: Governance - Natural Environment

Subarea
Garbage collection 75% 86% 82% 94% 84%
Recycling 91% 82% 78% 94% 84%
Shakopee open space 59% 58% 58% 69% 59%
4
Table 14: Governance - Built Environment

Subarea
Storm drainage 80% 84% 80% 93% 83%
Sewer services 75% 81% 87% 90% 82%
Land use, planning and zoning 47% 52% 43% 56% 49%
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 48% 54% 45% 65% 52%
Cable television 49% 45% 42% 50% 46%
Table 15: Governance - Economy

Subarea
Economic development 54% 67% 67% 79% 66%
Table 16: Governance - Recreation and Wellness

Subarea
City parks 77% 83% 80% 87% 82%
Recreation programs or classes 66% 75% 58% 75% 69%
Recreation centers or facilities 64% 70% 58% 69% 66%
Table 17: Governance - Education and Enrichment

Subarea
City-sponsored special events 54% 57% 56% 64% 57%
Table 18: Governance - Community Engagement

Subarea
Public information services 51% 61% 66% 73% 61%

Subarea
Percent rating positively (e.g., always/sometimes, more than Subarea Subarea Subarea Subarea
once a month, yes) 1 2 3 4 Overall
Sense of community 47% 54% 52% 62% 53%
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 74% 86% 89% 88% 84%
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 77% 81% 87% 91% 83%
Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or
web) for help or information 45% 40% 38% 44% 41%
Table 20: Participation - Safety

Subarea
Was NOT the victim of a crime 90% 87% 97% 91% 91%
Did NOT report a crime 85% 83% 81% 82% 83%
Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency 15% 23% 23% 24% 21%
5
Table 21: Participation - Mobility

Subarea
Walked or biked instead of driving 64% 51% 52% 44% 53%
Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone 30% 34% 45% 58% 39%
Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving 14% 14% 13% 16% 14%
Table 22: Participation - Natural Environment

Subarea
Recycle at home 86% 97% 98% 97% 95%
Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient 68% 82% 73% 92% 78%
Made efforts to conserve water 71% 82% 85% 82% 80%
Table 23: Participation - Built Environment

Subarea
NOT under housing cost stress 60% 72% 72% 69% 69%
Did NOT observe a code violation 66% 66% 56% 77% 65%
Table 24: Participation - Economy

Subarea
Purchase goods or services from a business located in
Shakopee 99% 92% 95% 90% 94%
Economy will have positive impact on income 28% 25% 33% 43% 30%
Work in Shakopee 41% 44% 32% 36% 40%
Table 25: Participation - Recreation and Wellness

Subarea
Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services 45% 49% 56% 66% 52%
Visited a neighborhood park or City park 76% 88% 92% 93% 87%
Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day 75% 82% 87% 91% 83%
Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity 74% 79% 83% 93% 80%
Reported being in "very good" or "excellent" health 62% 71% 74% 91% 72%
Table 26: Participation - Education and Enrichment

Subarea
Used Shakopee public libraries or their services 59% 58% 67% 48% 59%
Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee 39% 36% 44% 51% 40%
Attended a City-sponsored event 38% 37% 49% 47% 41%
6
Table 27: Participation - Community Engagement

Subarea
Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate 22% 15% 20% 30% 19%
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or
web) to express your opinion 20% 10% 11% 14% 13%
Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee 33% 24% 36% 42% 31%
Participated in a club 18% 17% 20% 30% 19%
Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors 83% 93% 95% 93% 91%
Done a favor for a neighbor 74% 75% 75% 82% 76%
Attended a local public meeting 13% 11% 24% 24% 16%
Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting 18% 22% 18% 24% 21%
Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.) 91% 85% 85% 82% 86%
Vote in local elections 89% 84% 84% 93% 86%
Table 28: Community Focus Areas

Subarea
Percent rating positively (e.g., essential/very important) 1 2 3 4 Overall
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 96% 93% 96% 86% 94%
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit 74% 78% 77% 68% 76%
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee 78% 80% 79% 71% 78%
design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) 76% 77% 84% 75% 78%
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 80% 78% 69% 71% 75%
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 85% 76% 75% 80% 78%
Overall economic health of Shakopee 84% 89% 94% 96% 90%
Sense of community 80% 83% 87% 77% 82%
Table 29: Question 8 Additional Line Item - Visited Downtown Shakopee

Subarea
Subarea 1 Subarea 2 Subarea 3 Subarea 4 Overall
Visited downtown Shakopee 98% 94% 92% 87% 93%
Table 30: City Residential Property Code Enforcement

Subarea
1 2 3 4 Overall
To what degree would you support or oppose a more
active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential
property codes? 92% 90% 80% 77% 86%
Table 31: Sources of Information

Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of Subarea
the following to be for obtaining information about the City
government and its activities, events and services:(Percent rating Subarea Subarea Subarea Subarea
as "Major" or "Minor source"). 1 2 3 4 Overall
City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) 73% 91% 89% 99% 88%
Shakopee Valley News 82% 86% 88% 88% 86%
Star Tribune 47% 58% 40% 43% 49%
Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240) 37% 47% 25% 38% 39%
7
Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of Subarea
the following to be for obtaining information about the City
government and its activities, events and services:(Percent rating Subarea Subarea Subarea Subarea
as "Major" or "Minor source"). 1 2 3 4 Overall
City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation
Activity Brochure) 81% 83% 81% 88% 83%
Talking with City officials 46% 48% 47% 57% 48%
City communications via social media 66% 68% 68% 74% 68%
Word-of-mouth 86% 75% 76% 76% 78%
Email (E-News, eNotifications) 58% 64% 68% 73% 64%
Table 32: Importance of Addressing City Projects

Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following Subarea
projects and issues will be for the City to address over the next Subarea Subarea Subarea Subarea
five years? (Percent rating as "Essential" or "Very important"). 1 2 3 4 Overall
Redeveloping downtown 70% 71% 56% 59% 65%
Improving the riverfront at Huber Park 29% 49% 32% 41% 40%
Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open
space within the City 52% 65% 53% 53% 58%
Improving access to public transportation 62% 53% 33% 37% 48%
Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency
response times 53% 42% 36% 50% 44%
8
Shakopee, MN
Technical Appendices
2016
n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780
Contents
Appendix A: Complete Survey Responses .......................................... 1
Appendix B: Benchmark Comparisons ............................................. 19
Appendix C: Detailed Survey Methods ............................................. 32
Appendix D: Survey Materials ......................................................... 37

2001-2017 National Research Center, Inc.
The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
NRC is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing

clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices.
Appendix A: Complete Survey Responses

Responses excluding dont know
The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey, excluding the dont know responses. The percent of
respondents giving a particular response is shown followed by the number of respondents (denoted with N=).
Table 1: Question 1
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total
Shakopee as a place to live 24% N=98 61% N=249 10% N=42 5% N=19 100% N=408
Your neighborhood as a place to live 30% N=123 49% N=199 15% N=63 6% N=24 100% N=409
Shakopee as a place to raise children 25% N=91 52% N=187 18% N=67 5% N=18 100% N=362
Shakopee as a place to work 23% N=69 38% N=115 31% N=94 7% N=22 100% N=300
Shakopee as a place to visit 24% N=96 44% N=175 26% N=103 5% N=20 100% N=394
Shakopee as a place to retire 15% N=44 37% N=110 31% N=94 17% N=50 100% N=299
The overall quality of life in Shakopee 14% N=56 67% N=265 16% N=62 3% N=13 100% N=396
Table 2: Question 2
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 20% N=84 58% N=240 19% N=76 3% N=11 100% N=410
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit 25% N=104 54% N=221 15% N=61 5% N=22 100% N=408
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee 17% N=68 59% N=241 22% N=88 2% N=9 100% N=406
Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation
systems) 11% N=44 50% N=199 34% N=135 5% N=22 100% N=400
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 17% N=67 56% N=215 23% N=89 4% N=16 100% N=387
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 18% N=66 47% N=170 29% N=104 6% N=21 100% N=360
Overall economic health of Shakopee 15% N=53 52% N=186 30% N=107 4% N=14 100% N=360
Sense of community 8% N=33 45% N=175 36% N=142 11% N=43 100% N=392
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 9% N=35 47% N=187 35% N=138 10% N=38 100% N=398
Table 3: Question 3
Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following: Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Total
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 31% N=127 53% N=216 9% N=37 7% N=27 100% N=407
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 51% N=203 31% N=124 8% N=30 10% N=38 100% N=394
Table 4: Question 4
Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Total
In your neighborhood during the day 73% N=295 19% N=78 5% N=20 2% N=8 1% N=5 100% N=405
In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during the day 56% N=217 32% N=125 7% N=26 4% N=17 0% N=2 100% N=386
1
Table 5: Question 5
Traffic flow on major streets 12% N=50 60% N=247 23% N=93 4% N=18 100% N=408
Ease of public parking 18% N=71 55% N=217 21% N=85 6% N=24 100% N=397
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 25% N=101 58% N=236 14% N=57 3% N=14 100% N=408
Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee 6% N=12 32% N=58 40% N=72 22% N=41 100% N=183
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 12% N=36 47% N=139 32% N=95 9% N=27 100% N=297
Ease of walking in Shakopee 18% N=70 48% N=185 27% N=107 7% N=28 100% N=389
Availability of paths and walking trails 25% N=98 44% N=175 24% N=96 7% N=28 100% N=396
Air quality 23% N=89 55% N=216 17% N=68 4% N=17 100% N=390
Cleanliness of Shakopee 17% N=69 61% N=247 18% N=75 4% N=17 100% N=408
Overall appearance of Shakopee 14% N=58 53% N=216 27% N=110 5% N=22 100% N=405
Public places where people want to spend time 11% N=42 52% N=204 28% N=111 9% N=36 100% N=393
Variety of housing options 14% N=54 49% N=183 26% N=97 11% N=40 100% N=374
Availability of affordable quality housing 14% N=46 41% N=141 31% N=106 14% N=48 100% N=342
Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) 14% N=56 48% N=185 30% N=116 8% N=30 100% N=388
Recreational opportunities 14% N=55 54% N=203 26% N=97 6% N=24 100% N=378
Availability of affordable quality food 14% N=55 45% N=183 25% N=100 16% N=66 100% N=404
Availability of affordable quality health care 22% N=84 53% N=203 20% N=77 5% N=20 100% N=384
Availability of preventive health services 23% N=84 53% N=192 20% N=71 4% N=15 100% N=363
Availability of affordable quality mental health care 11% N=24 45% N=97 30% N=65 13% N=27 100% N=213
Table 6: Question 6
Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool 14% N=28 42% N=88 31% N=65 13% N=28 100% N=210
K-12 education 17% N=47 53% N=145 21% N=59 9% N=24 100% N=275
Adult educational opportunities 8% N=23 43% N=116 36% N=99 13% N=34 100% N=273
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 7% N=22 35% N=114 40% N=132 19% N=61 100% N=329
Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities 20% N=62 49% N=155 27% N=85 4% N=12 100% N=314
Employment opportunities 16% N=50 48% N=154 28% N=91 9% N=28 100% N=324
Shopping opportunities 11% N=45 34% N=137 36% N=144 19% N=77 100% N=403
Cost of living in Shakopee 5% N=21 46% N=183 37% N=146 12% N=47 100% N=397
Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee 9% N=33 49% N=186 34% N=130 9% N=33 100% N=383
Vibrant downtown/commercial areas 4% N=14 29% N=108 44% N=166 24% N=91 100% N=380
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 13% N=50 50% N=190 30% N=115 6% N=24 100% N=379
Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 9% N=32 38% N=135 41% N=147 12% N=45 100% N=359
Opportunities to volunteer 10% N=28 49% N=139 31% N=87 11% N=31 100% N=285
Opportunities to participate in community matters 10% N=28 41% N=117 38% N=108 11% N=32 100% N=285
Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 15% N=50 44% N=152 31% N=106 11% N=38 100% N=346
Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee 13% N=50 41% N=154 35% N=132 11% N=41 100% N=378
2
Table 7: Question 7
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes Total
Made efforts to conserve water 20% N=80 80% N=327 100% N=407
Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient 22% N=89 78% N=316 100% N=405
Observed a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 65% N=260 35% N=139 100% N=399
Household member was a victim of a crime in Shakopee 91% N=368 9% N=38 100% N=406
Reported a crime to the police in Shakopee 83% N=336 17% N=69 100% N=406
Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency 79% N=319 21% N=85 100% N=404
Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate 81% N=327 19% N=78 100% N=404
Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information 59% N=238 41% N=166 100% N=404
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion 87% N=353 13% N=52 100% N=405
Table 8: Question 8
In the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household 2 times a week or 2-4 times a Once a month or
members done each of the following in Shakopee? more month less Not at all Total
Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services 7% N=30 13% N=52 32% N=130 48% N=196 100% N=408
Visited a neighborhood park or City park 14% N=55 33% N=134 40% N=164 13% N=54 100% N=406
Used Shakopee public libraries or their services 4% N=15 16% N=65 39% N=159 41% N=164 100% N=404
Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee 9% N=38 16% N=65 15% N=61 60% N=242 100% N=406
Attended a City-sponsored event 1% N=4 4% N=15 37% N=149 59% N=239 100% N=407
Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving 3% N=12 2% N=10 9% N=36 86% N=349 100% N=406
Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone 13% N=54 13% N=52 13% N=51 61% N=250 100% N=406
Walked or biked instead of driving 8% N=34 16% N=66 28% N=115 47% N=191 100% N=406
Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee 4% N=17 7% N=29 20% N=80 69% N=282 100% N=408
Participated in a club 3% N=11 5% N=21 11% N=46 81% N=327 100% N=406
Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors 31% N=127 35% N=140 25% N=103 9% N=35 100% N=405
Done a favor for a neighbor 16% N=64 16% N=64 44% N=181 24% N=99 100% N=409
Visited downtown Shakopee 13% N=52 33% N=134 48% N=196 7% N=27 100% N=408
Table 9: Question 9
Thinking about local public meetings (of local elected officials like City Council or County
Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.), in the last 12 months,
about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members attended or watched a local 2 times a 2-4 times a Once a month
public meeting? week or more month or less Not at all Total
Attended a local public meeting 0% N=2 1% N=3 15% N=59 84% N=341 100% N=405
Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting 1% N=2 5% N=18 16% N=63 79% N=322 100% N=405
3
Table 10: Question 10
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total
Police services 32% N=115 53% N=192 11% N=41 3% N=12 100% N=359
Fire services 35% N=110 56% N=177 9% N=29 0% N=0 100% N=316
Crime prevention 18% N=57 57% N=181 20% N=64 5% N=17 100% N=319
Fire prevention and education 22% N=63 60% N=167 17% N=47 1% N=2 100% N=279
Traffic enforcement 16% N=53 58% N=192 21% N=70 6% N=18 100% N=334
Street repair 8% N=29 48% N=181 35% N=133 9% N=35 100% N=377
Street cleaning 14% N=56 59% N=232 22% N=88 4% N=16 100% N=391
Street lighting 11% N=44 47% N=181 32% N=122 10% N=38 100% N=385
Snow removal 25% N=97 48% N=190 20% N=79 7% N=26 100% N=392
Sidewalk maintenance 16% N=56 52% N=186 24% N=86 7% N=26 100% N=354
Traffic signal timing 14% N=57 45% N=181 26% N=106 14% N=57 100% N=402
Garbage collection 22% N=87 62% N=243 12% N=47 4% N=17 100% N=395
Recycling 23% N=91 61% N=235 12% N=45 4% N=16 100% N=388
Storm drainage 20% N=69 63% N=216 14% N=48 3% N=9 100% N=342
Sewer services 20% N=68 62% N=208 15% N=50 3% N=9 100% N=335
City parks 25% N=94 57% N=211 14% N=52 4% N=17 100% N=374
Recreation programs or classes 15% N=43 54% N=150 21% N=59 10% N=28 100% N=280
Recreation centers or facilities 14% N=42 52% N=153 27% N=80 7% N=22 100% N=296
Land use, planning and zoning 7% N=19 42% N=119 34% N=95 17% N=47 100% N=280
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 8% N=22 44% N=121 27% N=75 21% N=57 100% N=275
Animal control 15% N=39 54% N=136 19% N=49 12% N=30 100% N=254
Economic development 11% N=37 55% N=184 25% N=82 10% N=32 100% N=335
Public information services 11% N=31 51% N=150 29% N=86 10% N=28 100% N=295
Cable television 9% N=25 37% N=109 30% N=87 25% N=72 100% N=294
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other
emergency situations) 11% N=26 47% N=113 31% N=73 11% N=28 100% N=241
Shakopee open space 9% N=31 50% N=166 29% N=97 11% N=37 100% N=331
City-sponsored special events 10% N=28 47% N=129 28% N=78 15% N=42 100% N=278
Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) 20% N=68 53% N=185 19% N=66 8% N=27 100% N=346

Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Total
The City of Shakopee 17% N=65 53% N=199 25% N=92 5% N=17 100% N=372
The Federal Government 7% N=23 42% N=145 33% N=113 19% N=66 100% N=347
Scott County Government 18% N=66 50% N=183 24% N=88 8% N=28 100% N=364
4
Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total
The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 7% N=27 39% N=145 37% N=135 16% N=60 100% N=367
The overall direction that Shakopee is taking 12% N=47 49% N=183 27% N=101 12% N=46 100% N=377
The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement 9% N=27 39% N=121 33% N=103 18% N=56 100% N=307
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 6% N=24 47% N=171 33% N=121 14% N=50 100% N=366
Generally acting in the best interest of the community 9% N=32 46% N=162 30% N=107 14% N=50 100% N=350
Being honest 9% N=28 46% N=144 27% N=83 18% N=57 100% N=312
Treating all residents fairly 13% N=40 45% N=141 30% N=93 12% N=37 100% N=312

Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on Very Somewhat Not at all
each of the following in the coming two years: Essential important important important Total
Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and
transportation systems) 31% N=125 47% N=191 20% N=83 2% N=7 100% N=406

To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential property codes? Percent Number
Strongly support 34% N=121
Somewhat support 53% N=192
Somewhat oppose 9% N=33
Strongly oppose 4% N=16
Total 100% N=362

Which of these items, if any, would attract you to Downtown Shakopee more often? Percent Number
Retail 39% N=156
Public amenities 6% N=25
Public events 14% N=58
Restaurants 41% N=164
Total 100% N=403
5
Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information about
the City government and its activities, events and services: Major source Minor source Not a source Total
City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) 57% N=230 30% N=123 12% N=50 100% N=403
Shakopee Valley News 49% N=198 37% N=150 14% N=58 100% N=406
Star Tribune 17% N=67 33% N=132 51% N=203 100% N=403
Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240) 9% N=35 30% N=120 61% N=246 100% N=401
City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure) 35% N=141 48% N=191 17% N=69 100% N=400
Talking with City officials 14% N=57 34% N=136 52% N=206 100% N=399
City communications via social media 23% N=91 45% N=182 32% N=128 100% N=402
Word-of-mouth 27% N=110 50% N=202 22% N=91 100% N=403
Email (E-News, eNotifications) 23% N=93 41% N=166 36% N=143 100% N=401

Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and issues will be for the Very Somewhat Not at all
City to address over the next five years? Essential important important important Total
Redeveloping downtown 33% N=127 33% N=126 29% N=113 5% N=21 100% N=388
Improving the riverfront at Huber Park 16% N=62 24% N=91 43% N=167 17% N=65 100% N=386
Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space within the City 19% N=74 39% N=149 36% N=138 6% N=23 100% N=383
Improving access to public transportation 21% N=76 27% N=101 34% N=126 18% N=64 100% N=367
Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response times 14% N=50 30% N=104 44% N=154 12% N=41 100% N=349
Table 18: Question D1

How often, if at all, do you do each of the following, considering all of the times you
could? Never Rarely Sometimes Usually Always Total
Recycle at home 4% N=17 1% N=2 1% N=4 20% N=82 74% N=299 100% N=404
Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee 1% N=2 5% N=21 31% N=123 42% N=168 22% N=89 100% N=404
Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day 3% N=13 14% N=55 42% N=166 27% N=108 13% N=51 100% N=393
Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity 1% N=6 18% N=73 38% N=154 26% N=103 16% N=65 100% N=401
Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.) 1% N=6 13% N=51 21% N=83 34% N=137 31% N=127 100% N=404
Vote in local elections 7% N=27 7% N=30 6% N=25 24% N=95 56% N=227 100% N=404

Would you say that in general your health is: Percent Number
Excellent 22% N=90
Very good 50% N=203
Good 22% N=89
Fair 4% N=18
Poor 1% N=6
Total 100% N=407
6
What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Percent Number
Very positive 5% N=19
Somewhat positive 25% N=100
Neutral 53% N=216
Somewhat negative 13% N=53
Very negative 4% N=17
Total 100% N=405

What is your employment status? Percent Number
Working full time for pay 75% N=306
Working part time for pay 8% N=32
Unemployed, looking for paid work 3% N=12
Unemployed, not looking for paid work 2% N=9
Fully retired 12% N=47
Total 100% N=406

Do you work inside the boundaries of Shakopee? Percent Number
Yes, outside the home 34% N=137
Yes, from home 5% N=21
No 60% N=241
Total 100% N=399

How many years have you lived in Shakopee? Percent Number
Less than 2 years 17% N=70
2 to 5 years 20% N=80
6 to 10 years 17% N=70
11 to 20 years 27% N=112
More than 20 years 19% N=75
Total 100% N=407

Which best describes the building you live in? Percent Number
One family house detached from any other houses 60% N=244
Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment or condominium) 38% N=156
Mobile home 0% N=0
Other 2% N=8
Total 100% N=408
7
Is this house, apartment or mobile home... Percent Number
Rented 21% N=86
Owned 79% N=320
Total 100% N=406

About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association
(HOA) fees)? Percent Number
Less than $300 per month 2% N=8
$300 to $599 per month 8% N=31
$600 to $999 per month 12% N=47
$1,000 to $1,499 per month 37% N=147
$1,500 to $2,499 per month 34% N=135
$2,500 or more per month 8% N=34
Total 100% N=402

Do any children 17 or under live in your household? Percent Number
No 50% N=204
Yes 50% N=202
Total 100% N=406

Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? Percent Number
No 83% N=338
Yes 17% N=71
Total 100% N=408

How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all
persons living in your household.) Percent Number
Less than $25,000 7% N=29
$25,000 to $49,999 18% N=70
$50,000 to $99,999 34% N=134
$100,000 to $149,999 26% N=105
$150,000 or more 15% N=61
Total 100% N=398

Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino? Percent Number
No, not Spanish, Hispanic or Latino 96% N=389
Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic or Latino 4% N=18
Total 100% N=407
8
What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race(s) you consider yourself to be.) Percent Number
American Indian or Alaskan Native 2% N=10
Asian, Asian Indian or Pacific Islander 11% N=45
Black or African American 3% N=13
White 85% N=346
Other 4% N=16
Total may exceed 100% as respondents could select more than one option.

In which category is your age? Percent Number
18 to 24 years 6% N=25
25 to 34 years 29% N=117
35 to 44 years 21% N=87
45 to 54 years 23% N=94
55 to 64 years 8% N=34
65 to 74 years 8% N=31
75 years or older 5% N=19
Total 100% N=408

What is your sex? Percent Number
Female 51% N=202
Male 49% N=197
Total 100% N=399

Do you consider a cell phone or landline your primary telephone number? Percent Number
Cell 71% N=289
Land line 14% N=57
Both 15% N=61
Total 100% N=407
9
Responses including dont know

The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey, including the dont know responses. The percent of respondents
giving a particular response is shown followed by the number of respondents (denoted with N=).

Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Total
Shakopee as a place to live 24% N=98 61% N=249 10% N=42 5% N=19 0% N=0 100% N=408
Your neighborhood as a place to live 30% N=123 49% N=199 15% N=63 6% N=24 0% N=0 100% N=409
Shakopee as a place to raise children 22% N=91 46% N=187 16% N=67 4% N=18 11% N=46 100% N=408
Shakopee as a place to work 17% N=69 28% N=115 23% N=94 5% N=22 26% N=108 100% N=408
Shakopee as a place to visit 24% N=96 43% N=175 25% N=103 5% N=20 4% N=16 100% N=410
Shakopee as a place to retire 11% N=44 27% N=110 23% N=94 12% N=50 26% N=106 100% N=404
The overall quality of life in Shakopee 14% N=56 65% N=265 15% N=62 3% N=13 3% N=11 100% N=407

Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a
whole: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Total
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 20% N=84 58% N=240 19% N=76 3% N=11 0% N=0 100% N=410
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit 25% N=104 54% N=221 15% N=61 5% N=22 0% N=2 100% N=410
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee 17% N=68 59% N=241 22% N=88 2% N=9 0% N=1 100% N=408
Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks
and transportation systems) 11% N=44 49% N=199 33% N=135 5% N=22 2% N=9 100% N=409
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 16% N=67 52% N=215 22% N=89 4% N=16 6% N=23 100% N=410
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 16% N=66 42% N=170 25% N=104 5% N=21 12% N=49 100% N=410
Overall economic health of Shakopee 13% N=53 45% N=186 26% N=107 4% N=14 12% N=49 100% N=409
Sense of community 8% N=33 43% N=175 35% N=142 10% N=43 3% N=14 100% N=406
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 9% N=35 46% N=187 34% N=138 9% N=38 2% N=10 100% N=408

Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following: Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Don't know Total
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 31% N=127 53% N=216 9% N=37 7% N=27 0% N=1 100% N=409
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 49% N=203 30% N=124 7% N=30 9% N=38 4% N=16 100% N=410

Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Don't know Total
In your neighborhood during the day 72% N=295 19% N=78 5% N=20 2% N=8 1% N=5 1% N=3 100% N=407
In Shakopee's downtown/commercial areas during the day 53% N=217 31% N=125 6% N=26 4% N=17 0% N=2 5% N=21 100% N=407
10
Traffic flow on major streets 12% N=50 60% N=247 23% N=93 4% N=18 0% N=1 100% N=409
Ease of public parking 17% N=71 53% N=217 21% N=85 6% N=24 3% N=11 100% N=408
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 25% N=101 58% N=236 14% N=57 3% N=14 0% N=1 100% N=410
Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee 3% N=12 14% N=58 18% N=72 10% N=41 55% N=225 100% N=408
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 9% N=36 34% N=139 23% N=95 7% N=27 27% N=107 100% N=404
Ease of walking in Shakopee 17% N=70 46% N=185 26% N=107 7% N=28 4% N=16 100% N=405
Availability of paths and walking trails 24% N=98 43% N=175 24% N=96 7% N=28 3% N=11 100% N=407
Air quality 22% N=89 53% N=216 17% N=68 4% N=17 4% N=17 100% N=408
Cleanliness of Shakopee 17% N=69 60% N=247 18% N=75 4% N=17 0% N=1 100% N=410
Overall appearance of Shakopee 14% N=58 53% N=216 27% N=110 5% N=22 0% N=2 100% N=407
Public places where people want to spend time 10% N=42 50% N=204 27% N=111 9% N=36 4% N=14 100% N=407
Variety of housing options 13% N=54 45% N=183 24% N=97 10% N=40 8% N=33 100% N=407
Availability of affordable quality housing 11% N=46 35% N=141 26% N=106 12% N=48 16% N=66 100% N=408
Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) 14% N=56 45% N=185 28% N=116 7% N=30 5% N=22 100% N=410
Recreational opportunities 13% N=55 50% N=203 24% N=97 6% N=24 7% N=30 100% N=409
Availability of affordable quality food 13% N=55 45% N=183 24% N=100 16% N=66 1% N=4 100% N=408
Availability of affordable quality health care 21% N=84 50% N=203 19% N=77 5% N=20 6% N=24 100% N=409
Availability of preventive health services 21% N=84 47% N=192 18% N=71 4% N=15 11% N=43 100% N=406
Availability of affordable quality mental health care 6% N=24 24% N=97 16% N=65 7% N=27 48% N=194 100% N=408

Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool 7% N=28 22% N=88 16% N=65 7% N=28 48% N=191 100% N=400
K-12 education 12% N=47 36% N=145 15% N=59 6% N=24 32% N=131 100% N=406
Adult educational opportunities 6% N=23 29% N=116 25% N=99 9% N=34 32% N=128 100% N=401
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 5% N=22 28% N=114 32% N=132 15% N=61 19% N=76 100% N=405
Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities 15% N=62 38% N=155 21% N=85 3% N=12 22% N=90 100% N=404
Employment opportunities 12% N=50 38% N=154 23% N=91 7% N=28 20% N=78 100% N=402
Shopping opportunities 11% N=45 34% N=137 36% N=144 19% N=77 0% N=1 100% N=405
Cost of living in Shakopee 5% N=21 45% N=183 36% N=146 12% N=47 2% N=8 100% N=405
Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee 8% N=33 46% N=186 32% N=130 8% N=33 6% N=23 100% N=406
Vibrant downtown/commercial areas 3% N=14 27% N=108 41% N=166 22% N=91 7% N=27 100% N=406
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 12% N=50 47% N=190 28% N=115 6% N=24 6% N=26 100% N=405
Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 8% N=32 33% N=135 36% N=147 11% N=45 11% N=46 100% N=405
Opportunities to volunteer 7% N=28 34% N=139 22% N=87 8% N=31 30% N=119 100% N=404
Opportunities to participate in community matters 7% N=28 29% N=117 27% N=108 8% N=32 29% N=118 100% N=403
Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 12% N=50 38% N=152 26% N=106 9% N=38 15% N=59 100% N=405
Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee 13% N=50 38% N=154 33% N=132 10% N=41 6% N=25 100% N=403
11
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes Total
Made efforts to conserve water 20% N=80 80% N=327 100% N=407
Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient 22% N=89 78% N=316 100% N=405
Observed a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 65% N=260 35% N=139 100% N=399
Household member was a victim of a crime in Shakopee 91% N=368 9% N=38 100% N=406
Reported a crime to the police in Shakopee 83% N=336 17% N=69 100% N=406
Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency 79% N=319 21% N=85 100% N=404
Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate 81% N=327 19% N=78 100% N=404
Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information 59% N=238 41% N=166 100% N=404
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion 87% N=353 13% N=52 100% N=405

In the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household 2 times a week or 2-4 times a Once a month or
members done each of the following in Shakopee? more month less Not at all Total
Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services 7% N=30 13% N=52 32% N=130 48% N=196 100% N=408
Visited a neighborhood park or City park 14% N=55 33% N=134 40% N=164 13% N=54 100% N=406
Used Shakopee public libraries or their services 4% N=15 16% N=65 39% N=159 41% N=164 100% N=404
Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee 9% N=38 16% N=65 15% N=61 60% N=242 100% N=406
Attended a City-sponsored event 1% N=4 4% N=15 37% N=149 59% N=239 100% N=407
Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving 3% N=12 2% N=10 9% N=36 86% N=349 100% N=406
Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone 13% N=54 13% N=52 13% N=51 61% N=250 100% N=406
Walked or biked instead of driving 8% N=34 16% N=66 28% N=115 47% N=191 100% N=406
Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee 4% N=17 7% N=29 20% N=80 69% N=282 100% N=408
Participated in a club 3% N=11 5% N=21 11% N=46 81% N=327 100% N=406
Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors 31% N=127 35% N=140 25% N=103 9% N=35 100% N=405
Done a favor for a neighbor 16% N=64 16% N=64 44% N=181 24% N=99 100% N=409
Visited downtown Shakopee 13% N=52 33% N=134 48% N=196 7% N=27 100% N=408

Thinking about local public meetings (of local elected officials like City Council or County
Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.), in the last 12 months,
about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members attended or watched a local 2 times a 2-4 times a Once a month
public meeting? week or more month or less Not at all Total
Attended a local public meeting 0% N=2 1% N=3 15% N=59 84% N=341 100% N=405
Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting 1% N=2 5% N=18 16% N=63 79% N=322 100% N=405
12
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Total
Police services 29% N=115 48% N=192 10% N=41 3% N=12 11% N=43 100% N=403
Fire services 27% N=110 44% N=177 7% N=29 0% N=0 22% N=88 100% N=404
Crime prevention 14% N=57 45% N=181 16% N=64 4% N=17 21% N=86 100% N=405
Fire prevention and education 15% N=63 41% N=167 12% N=47 1% N=2 31% N=126 100% N=405
Traffic enforcement 13% N=53 48% N=192 18% N=70 5% N=18 16% N=64 100% N=398
Street repair 7% N=29 45% N=181 33% N=133 9% N=35 6% N=25 100% N=401
Street cleaning 14% N=56 58% N=232 22% N=88 4% N=16 3% N=11 100% N=402
Street lighting 11% N=44 45% N=181 31% N=122 10% N=38 4% N=14 100% N=399
Snow removal 24% N=97 47% N=190 20% N=79 6% N=26 3% N=11 100% N=403
Sidewalk maintenance 14% N=56 46% N=186 21% N=86 6% N=26 12% N=48 100% N=402
Traffic signal timing 14% N=57 45% N=181 26% N=106 14% N=57 1% N=4 100% N=405
Garbage collection 22% N=87 60% N=243 12% N=47 4% N=17 2% N=9 100% N=403
Recycling 22% N=91 58% N=235 11% N=45 4% N=16 4% N=16 100% N=404
Storm drainage 17% N=69 53% N=216 12% N=48 2% N=9 15% N=62 100% N=404
Sewer services 17% N=68 52% N=208 12% N=50 2% N=9 17% N=68 100% N=403
City parks 23% N=94 52% N=211 13% N=52 4% N=17 8% N=31 100% N=405
Recreation programs or classes 11% N=43 37% N=150 15% N=59 7% N=28 31% N=126 100% N=405
Recreation centers or facilities 10% N=42 38% N=153 20% N=80 5% N=22 26% N=105 100% N=401
Land use, planning and zoning 5% N=19 30% N=119 24% N=95 12% N=47 30% N=120 100% N=400
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 5% N=22 30% N=121 18% N=75 14% N=57 32% N=130 100% N=405
Animal control 10% N=39 34% N=136 12% N=49 7% N=30 37% N=152 100% N=405
Economic development 9% N=37 45% N=184 20% N=82 8% N=32 17% N=70 100% N=405
Public information services 8% N=31 37% N=150 21% N=86 7% N=28 26% N=106 100% N=401
Cable television 6% N=25 27% N=109 22% N=87 18% N=72 27% N=108 100% N=402
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters
or other emergency situations) 7% N=26 28% N=113 18% N=73 7% N=28 40% N=163 100% N=403
Shakopee open space 8% N=31 41% N=166 24% N=97 9% N=37 18% N=72 100% N=403
City-sponsored special events 7% N=28 32% N=129 19% N=78 11% N=42 31% N=123 100% N=401
Overall customer service by Shakopee employees (police, receptionists, planners,
etc.) 17% N=68 47% N=185 17% N=66 7% N=27 13% N=51 100% N=397

Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the
following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Total
The City of Shakopee 16% N=65 49% N=199 23% N=92 4% N=17 7% N=30 100% N=402
The Federal Government 6% N=23 36% N=145 28% N=113 16% N=66 14% N=55 100% N=402
Scott County Government 16% N=66 45% N=183 22% N=88 7% N=28 10% N=39 100% N=403
13
Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Total
The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 7% N=27 36% N=145 33% N=135 15% N=60 9% N=37 100% N=405
The overall direction that Shakopee is taking 12% N=47 45% N=183 25% N=101 11% N=46 7% N=27 100% N=405
The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement 7% N=27 30% N=121 26% N=103 14% N=56 24% N=95 100% N=402
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 6% N=24 42% N=171 30% N=121 12% N=50 9% N=38 100% N=404
Generally acting in the best interest of the community 8% N=32 40% N=162 26% N=107 12% N=50 14% N=55 100% N=405
Being honest 7% N=28 36% N=144 21% N=83 14% N=57 23% N=92 100% N=404
Treating all residents fairly 10% N=40 35% N=141 23% N=93 9% N=37 23% N=94 100% N=405

Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on Very Somewhat Not at all
each of the following in the coming two years: Essential important important important Total
Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including overall design, buildings, parks and
transportation systems) 31% N=125 47% N=191 20% N=83 2% N=7 100% N=406

To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of residential property codes? Percent Number
Strongly support 30% N=121
Somewhat support 47% N=192
Somewhat oppose 8% N=33
Strongly oppose 4% N=16
Don't know 11% N=44
Total 100% N=406

Which of these items, if any, would attract you to Downtown Shakopee more often? Percent Number
Retail 39% N=156
Public amenities 6% N=25
Public events 14% N=58
Restaurants 41% N=164
Total 100% N=403
14
Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information about
the City government and its activities, events and services: Major source Minor source Not a source Total
City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) 57% N=230 30% N=123 12% N=50 100% N=403
Shakopee Valley News 49% N=198 37% N=150 14% N=58 100% N=406
Star Tribune 17% N=67 33% N=132 51% N=203 100% N=403
Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240) 9% N=35 30% N=120 61% N=246 100% N=401
City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure) 35% N=141 48% N=191 17% N=69 100% N=400
Talking with City officials 14% N=57 34% N=136 52% N=206 100% N=399
City communications via social media 23% N=91 45% N=182 32% N=128 100% N=402
Word-of-mouth 27% N=110 50% N=202 22% N=91 100% N=403
Email (E-News, eNotifications) 23% N=93 41% N=166 36% N=143 100% N=401

Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and Very Somewhat Not at all
issues will be for the City to address over the next five years? Essential important important important Don't know Total
Redeveloping downtown 31% N=127 31% N=126 28% N=113 5% N=21 4% N=17 100% N=404
Improving the riverfront at Huber Park 15% N=62 23% N=91 41% N=167 16% N=65 5% N=19 100% N=405
Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space within the
City 18% N=74 37% N=149 34% N=138 6% N=23 5% N=20 100% N=403
Improving access to public transportation 19% N=76 25% N=101 31% N=126 16% N=64 9% N=37 100% N=404
Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency response
times 12% N=50 26% N=104 38% N=154 10% N=41 14% N=56 100% N=405

How often, if at all, do you do each of the following, considering all of the times you
could? Never Rarely Sometimes Usually Always Total
Recycle at home 4% N=17 1% N=2 1% N=4 20% N=82 74% N=299 100% N=404
Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee 1% N=2 5% N=21 31% N=123 42% N=168 22% N=89 100% N=404
Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day 3% N=13 14% N=55 42% N=166 27% N=108 13% N=51 100% N=393
Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity 1% N=6 18% N=73 38% N=154 26% N=103 16% N=65 100% N=401
Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.) 1% N=6 13% N=51 21% N=83 34% N=137 31% N=127 100% N=404
Vote in local elections 7% N=27 7% N=30 6% N=25 24% N=95 56% N=227 100% N=404

Would you say that in general your health is: Percent Number
Excellent 22% N=90
Very good 50% N=203
Good 22% N=89
Fair 4% N=18
Poor 1% N=6
Total 100% N=407
15
What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Percent Number
Very positive 5% N=19
Somewhat positive 25% N=100
Neutral 53% N=216
Somewhat negative 13% N=53
Very negative 4% N=17
Total 100% N=405

What is your employment status? Percent Number
Working full time for pay 75% N=306
Working part time for pay 8% N=32
Unemployed, looking for paid work 3% N=12
Unemployed, not looking for paid work 2% N=9
Fully retired 12% N=47
Total 100% N=406

Do you work inside the boundaries of Shakopee? Percent Number
Yes, outside the home 34% N=137
Yes, from home 5% N=21
No 60% N=241
Total 100% N=399

How many years have you lived in Shakopee? Percent Number
Less than 2 years 17% N=70
2 to 5 years 20% N=80
6 to 10 years 17% N=70
11 to 20 years 27% N=112
More than 20 years 19% N=75
Total 100% N=407

Which best describes the building you live in? Percent Number
One family house detached from any other houses 60% N=244
Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment or condominium) 38% N=156
Mobile home 0% N=0
Other 2% N=8
Total 100% N=408
16
Is this house, apartment or mobile home... Percent Number
Rented 21% N=86
Owned 79% N=320
Total 100% N=406

About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association
(HOA) fees)? Percent Number
Less than $300 per month 2% N=8
$300 to $599 per month 8% N=31
$600 to $999 per month 12% N=47
$1,000 to $1,499 per month 37% N=147
$1,500 to $2,499 per month 34% N=135
$2,500 or more per month 8% N=34
Total 100% N=402

Do any children 17 or under live in your household? Percent Number
No 50% N=204
Yes 50% N=202
Total 100% N=406

Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? Percent Number
No 83% N=338
Yes 17% N=71
Total 100% N=408

How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all
persons living in your household.) Percent Number
Less than $25,000 7% N=29
$25,000 to $49,999 18% N=70
$50,000 to $99,999 34% N=134
$100,000 to $149,999 26% N=105
$150,000 or more 15% N=61
Total 100% N=398

Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino? Percent Number
No, not Spanish, Hispanic or Latino 96% N=389
Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic or Latino 4% N=18
Total 100% N=407
17
What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race(s) you consider yourself to be.) Percent Number
American Indian or Alaskan Native 2% N=10
Asian, Asian Indian or Pacific Islander 11% N=45
Black or African American 3% N=13
White 85% N=346
Other 4% N=16
Total may exceed 100% as respondents could select more than one option.

In which category is your age? Percent Number
18 to 24 years 6% N=25
25 to 34 years 29% N=117
35 to 44 years 21% N=87
45 to 54 years 23% N=94
55 to 64 years 8% N=34
65 to 74 years 8% N=31
75 years or older 5% N=19
Total 100% N=408

What is your sex? Percent Number
Female 51% N=202
Male 49% N=197
Total 100% N=399

Do you consider a cell phone or landline your primary telephone number? Percent Number
Cell 71% N=289
Land line 14% N=57
Both 15% N=61
Total 100% N=407
18
Appendix B: Benchmark Comparisons

Comparison Data
NRCs database of comparative resident opinion comprises resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over
500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Citizen Survey. The
comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community; most communities
conduct surveys every year or in alternating years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion,
keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic
and population range. The City of Shakopee chose to have comparisons made to the entire database and a subset
of similar jurisdictions from the database (communities located in the Twin City Metro Area).
Benchmark Database Characteristics

Interpreting the Results Region Percent
Ratings are compared when there are at least five communities in which a New England 3%
similar question was asked. Where comparisons are available, four columns Middle Atlantic 5%
are provided in the table. The first column is Shakopees percent positive. East North Central 15%
The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response West North Central 13%
options (i.e., excellent and good, very safe and somewhat safe, South Atlantic 22%
essential and very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident East South Central 3%
behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of West South Central 7%
respondents indicating yes or participating in an activity at least once a Mountain 16%
month. The second column is the rank assigned to Shakopees rating among Pacific 16%
communities where a similar question was asked. The third column is the Population Percent
number of communities that asked a similar question. The final column Less than 10,000 10%
shows the comparison of Shakopees rating to the benchmark. 10,000 to 24,999 22%
25,000 to 49,999 23%
In that final column, Shakopees results are noted as being higher than the 50,000 to 99,999 22%
benchmark, lower than the benchmark or similar to the benchmark, 100,000 or more 23%
meaning that the average rating given by Shakopee residents is statistically
similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. More extreme differences are noted as much
higher or much lower.
19
National Benchmark Comparisons

Table 69: Community Characteristics General
Percent positive Rank Number of communities in comparison Comparison to benchmark
The overall quality of life in Shakopee 81% 308 436 Similar
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 56% 244 325 Lower
Shakopee as a place to live 85% 266 372 Similar
Your neighborhood as a place to live 79% 209 292 Similar
Shakopee as a place to raise children 77% 237 359 Similar
Shakopee as a place to retire 52% 272 333 Similar
Overall appearance of Shakopee 68% 223 334 Similar
Table 70: Community Characteristics by Facet

Number of
Percent communities in Comparison to
positive Rank comparison benchmark
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 79% 191 283 Similar
In your neighborhood during the day 92% 154 335 Similar
In Shakopee's downtown/commercial area during
Safety the day 89% 163 287 Similar
have to visit 80% 89 198 Similar
Availability of paths and walking trails 69% 114 290 Similar
Ease of walking in Shakopee 65% 140 271 Similar
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 59% 109 276 Similar
Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee 38% 89 168 Similar
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 83% 44 281 Higher
Ease of public parking 73% 30 163 Higher
Mobility Traffic flow on major streets 73% 41 330 Higher
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee 76% 169 256 Similar
Natural Cleanliness of Shakopee 78% 150 258 Similar
Environment Air quality 78% 126 233 Similar
Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including
overall design, buildings, parks and transportation
systems) 61% 109 188 Similar
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 63% 87 263 Similar
Availability of affordable quality housing 55% 84 284 Similar
Built Variety of housing options 63% 104 257 Similar
Environment Public places where people want to spend time 62% 118 181 Similar
Overall economic health of Shakopee 66% 95 193 Similar
Vibrant downtown/commercial area 32% 130 177 Lower
establishments in Shakopee 57% 175 253 Similar
Cost of living in Shakopee 51% 81 190 Similar
Shopping opportunities 45% 194 273 Similar
Employment opportunities 63% 25 292 Higher
Shakopee as a place to visit 69% 91 203 Similar
Economy Shakopee as a place to work 61% 157 333 Similar
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 73% 100 190 Similar
Availability of affordable quality mental health care 57% 51 164 Similar
Availability of preventive health services 76% 48 218 Similar
Availability of affordable quality health care 75% 57 241 Similar
Availability of affordable quality food 59% 174 218 Similar
Recreational opportunities 68% 162 285 Similar
Recreation and Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and

Wellness paths or trails, etc.) 62% 131 181 Similar
20
Number of
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 66% 113 190 Similar
events and activities 69% 150 186 Similar
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 41% 219 272 Lower
Adult educational opportunities 51% 124 170 Similar
Education and K-12 education 70% 162 247 Similar
Enrichment Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool 55% 107 235 Similar
activities 47% 200 240 Similar
Neighborliness of Shakopee 54% 127 184 Similar
people of diverse backgrounds 58% 171 269 Similar
Community Opportunities to participate in community matters 51% 207 254 Similar
Engagement Opportunities to volunteer 59% 219 245 Similar
Table 71: Governance General

Percent Number of communities in Comparison to
Services provided by the City of Shakopee 71% 252 414 Similar
receptionists, planners, etc.) 73% 233 348 Similar
Value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 47% 263 379 Similar
Overall direction that Shakopee is taking 61% 158 296 Similar
Job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen
involvement 48% 192 295 Similar
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 53% 108 190 Similar
Generally acting in the best interest of the community 55% 111 189 Similar
Being honest 55% 112 182 Similar
Treating all residents fairly 58% 87 187 Similar
Services provided by the Federal Government 49% 54 232 Similar
Table 72: Governance by Facet

Number of
Police services 85% 184 432 Similar
Fire services 91% 260 357 Similar
Crime prevention 75% 166 333 Similar
Fire prevention and education 82% 139 265 Similar
Animal control 69% 157 321 Similar
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare
the community for natural disasters or other
Safety emergency situations) 58% 195 263 Similar
Traffic enforcement 74% 128 347 Similar
Street repair 56% 155 395 Similar
Street cleaning 74% 108 301 Similar
Street lighting 58% 173 298 Similar
Snow removal 73% 77 282 Similar
Sidewalk maintenance 68% 71 307 Similar
Mobility Traffic signal timing 59% 60 240 Similar
Garbage collection 84% 272 338 Similar
Natural Recycling 84% 208 342 Similar
Environment Shakopee open space 59% 113 174 Similar
Built Storm drainage 83% 37 338 Higher
Environment Sewer services 82% 142 311 Similar
21
Number of
Land use, planning and zoning 49% 154 285 Similar
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings,
etc.) 52% 203 354 Similar
Cable television 46% 141 182 Similar
Economy Economic development 66% 84 267 Similar
City parks 82% 193 315 Similar
Recreation and Recreation programs or classes 69% 226 320 Similar
Wellness Recreation centers or facilities 66% 178 267 Similar
Education and
Enrichment City-sponsored special events 57% 179 209 Similar
Community
Engagement Public information services 61% 201 269 Similar

Sense of community 53% 217 289 Similar
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 84% 168 263 Similar
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 83% 152 256 Similar
Contacted Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web)
for help or information 41% 191 291 Similar
Table 74: Participation by Facet

Number of
Stocked supplies in preparation for an
emergency 21% 152 166 Lower
Did NOT report a crime to the police 83% 61 186 Similar
Household member was NOT a victim of a
Safety crime 91% 102 255 Similar
Used bus, rail, subway or other public
transportation instead of driving 14% 98 154 Lower
Carpooled with other adults or children instead
of driving alone 39% 124 176 Similar
Mobility Walked or biked instead of driving 53% 106 182 Similar
Made efforts to conserve water 80% 95 172 Similar
Natural efficient 78% 64 172 Similar
Environment Recycle at home 95% 64 239 Similar
Did NOT observe a code violation or other
hazard in Shakopee 65% 34 177 Higher
Built Environment NOT experiencing housing costs stress 69% 115 235 Similar
Purchase goods or services from a business
located in Shakopee 94% 145 179 Similar
Economy will have positive impact on income 30% 86 237 Similar
Economy Work inside boundaries of Shakopee 40% 83 179 Similar
Used Shakopee recreation centers or their
services 52% 159 222 Similar
Visited a neighborhood park or City park 87% 93 253 Similar
Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables
a day 83% 100 173 Similar
Participate in moderate or vigorous physical
activity 80% 142 177 Similar
Recreation and
Wellness In very good to excellent health 72% 58 176 Similar
22
Number of
Used Shakopee public libraries or their services 59% 155 222 Similar
Education and Shakopee 40% 130 186 Similar
Enrichment Attended City-sponsored event 41% 149 181 Lower
Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause
or candidate 19% 106 165 Similar
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-
person, phone, email or web) to express your
opinion 13% 143 179 Similar
Volunteered your time to some group/activity
in Shakopee 31% 183 243 Similar
Participated in a club 19% 186 222 Similar
Talked to or visited with your immediate
neighbors 91% 85 177 Similar
Done a favor for a neighbor 76% 142 171 Similar
Attended a local public meeting 16% 191 245 Similar
Watched (online or on television) a local public
meeting 21% 135 209 Similar
Read or watch local news (via television,
Community paper, computer, etc.) 86% 95 180 Similar
Engagement Vote in local elections 86% 57 237 Similar
Communities included in national comparisons

The communities included in Shakopees comparisons are listed on the following pages along with their
population according to the 2010 Census.
Airway Heights city, WA ............................................. 6,114 Bainbridge Island city, WA ........................................ 23,025
Albany city, OR ........................................................ 50,158 Baltimore city, MD...................................................620,961
Albemarle County, VA............................................... 98,970 Bartonville town, TX ................................................... 1,469
Albert Lea city, MN ................................................... 18,016 Battle Creek city, MI ................................................. 52,347
Alexandria city, VA ..................................................139,966 Bay City city, MI....................................................... 34,932
Algonquin village, IL ................................................. 30,046 Baytown city, TX ...................................................... 71,802
Aliso Viejo city, CA ................................................... 47,823 Bedford city, TX ....................................................... 46,979
Altoona city, IA ........................................................ 14,541 Bedford town, MA .................................................... 13,320
American Canyon city, CA ......................................... 19,454 Bellevue city, WA ....................................................122,363
Ames city, IA ........................................................... 58,965 Bellingham city, WA ................................................. 80,885
Andover CDP, MA....................................................... 8,762 Beltrami County, MN ................................................ 44,442
Ankeny city, IA ........................................................ 45,582 Benbrook city, TX..................................................... 21,234
Ann Arbor city, MI ...................................................113,934 Bend city, OR........................................................... 76,639
Annapolis city, MD ................................................... 38,394 Bettendorf city, IA .................................................... 33,217
Apache Junction city, AZ........................................... 35,840 Billings city, MT .......................................................104,170
Apple Valley town, CA .............................................. 69,135 Blaine city, MN ......................................................... 57,186
Arapahoe County, CO ..............................................572,003 Bloomfield Hills city, MI .............................................. 3,869
Arkansas City city, AR.................................................... 366 Bloomington city, MN ............................................... 82,893
Arlington County, VA ...............................................207,627 Blue Springs city, MO ............................................... 52,575
Arvada city, CO .......................................................106,433 Boise City city, ID....................................................205,671
Asheville city, NC ..................................................... 83,393 Boone County, KY ...................................................118,811
Ashland city, OR ...................................................... 20,078 Boulder city, CO ....................................................... 97,385
Ashland town, MA .................................................... 16,593 Bowling Green city, KY ............................................. 58,067
Ashland town, VA....................................................... 7,225 Bozeman city, MT .................................................... 37,280
Aspen city, CO ........................................................... 6,658 Brentwood city, MO.................................................... 8,055
Athens-Clarke County, GA........................................115,452 Brentwood city, TN .................................................. 37,060
Auburn city, AL ........................................................ 53,380 Brighton city, CO ...................................................... 33,352
Auburn city, WA ....................................................... 70,180 Brighton city, MI ........................................................ 7,444
Augusta CCD, GA ....................................................134,777 Bristol city, TN ......................................................... 26,702
Aurora city, CO .......................................................325,078 Broken Arrow city, OK .............................................. 98,850
Austin city, TX ........................................................790,390 Brookfield city, WI ................................................... 37,920
Avon town, CO........................................................... 6,447 Brookline CDP, MA ................................................... 58,732
Avondale city, AZ ..................................................... 76,238 Broomfield city, CO .................................................. 55,889
Azusa city, CA .......................................................... 46,361 Brownsburg town, IN ............................................... 21,285
23
Burien city, WA ........................................................ 33,313 Decatur city, GA ....................................................... 19,335
Burleson city, TX ...................................................... 36,690 Del Mar city, CA ......................................................... 4,161
Cabarrus County, NC ...............................................178,011 Delaware city, OH .................................................... 34,753
Cambridge city, MA .................................................105,162 Delray Beach city, FL ................................................ 60,522
Cannon Beach city, OR ............................................... 1,690 Denison city, TX ....................................................... 22,682
Caon City city, CO .................................................. 16,400 Denton city, TX .......................................................113,383
Canton city, SD .......................................................... 3,057 Denver city, CO.......................................................600,158
Cape Coral city, FL ..................................................154,305 Derby city, KS .......................................................... 22,158
Cape Girardeau city, MO ........................................... 37,941 Des Moines city, IA .................................................203,433
Carlisle borough, PA ................................................. 18,682 Des Peres city, MO ..................................................... 8,373
Carlsbad city, CA .....................................................105,328 Destin city, FL .......................................................... 12,305
Carroll city, IA .......................................................... 10,103 Dothan city, AL ........................................................ 65,496
Cartersville city, GA .................................................. 19,731 Douglas County, CO ................................................285,465
Cary town, NC ........................................................135,234 Dover city, NH ......................................................... 29,987
Casper city, WY ....................................................... 55,316 Dublin city, CA ......................................................... 46,036
Castine town, ME ....................................................... 1,366 Dublin city, OH ........................................................ 41,751
Castle Pines North city, CO ....................................... 10,360 Duluth city, MN ........................................................ 86,265
Castle Rock town, CO ............................................... 48,231 Duncanville city, TX .................................................. 38,524
Cedar Hill city, TX .................................................... 45,028 Durham city, NC .....................................................228,330
Cedar Rapids city, IA ...............................................126,326 Durham County, NC ................................................267,587
Celina city, TX ............................................................ 6,028 Eagan city, MN......................................................... 64,206
Centennial city, CO..................................................100,377 Eagle Mountain city, UT ............................................ 21,415
Chambersburg borough, PA ...................................... 20,268 Eagle town, CO .......................................................... 6,508
Chandler city, AZ ....................................................236,123 East Baton Rouge Parish, LA ....................................440,171
Chandler city, TX ....................................................... 2,734 East Grand Forks city, MN........................................... 8,601
Chanhassen city, MN ................................................ 22,952 East Lansing city, MI ................................................ 48,579
Chapel Hill town, NC ................................................ 57,233 Eau Claire city, WI ................................................... 65,883
Charles County, MD.................................................146,551 Eden Prairie city, MN ................................................ 60,797
Charlotte city, NC ....................................................731,424 Edgerton city, KS ....................................................... 1,671
Charlotte County, FL ...............................................159,978 Edgewater city, CO .................................................... 5,170
Charlottesville city, VA .............................................. 43,475 Edina city, MN ......................................................... 47,941
Chattanooga city, TN...............................................167,674 Edmond city, OK ...................................................... 81,405
Chesterfield County, VA ...........................................316,236 Edmonds city, WA .................................................... 39,709
Chippewa Falls city, WI ............................................ 13,661 El Cerrito city, CA ..................................................... 23,549
Citrus Heights city, CA .............................................. 83,301 El Dorado County, CA ..............................................181,058
Clackamas County, OR ............................................375,992 El Paso city, TX .......................................................649,121
Clarendon Hills village, IL ........................................... 8,427 Elk Grove city, CA ...................................................153,015
Clayton city, MO ...................................................... 15,939 Elk River city, MN ..................................................... 22,974
Clearwater city, FL ..................................................107,685 Elko New Market city, MN ........................................... 4,110
Cleveland Heights city, OH........................................ 46,121 Elmhurst city, IL....................................................... 44,121
Clinton city, SC .......................................................... 8,490 Encinitas city, CA ..................................................... 59,518
Clive city, IA ............................................................ 15,447 Englewood city, CO .................................................. 30,255
Clovis city, CA .......................................................... 95,631 Erie town, CO .......................................................... 18,135
College Park city, MD ............................................... 30,413 Escambia County, FL ...............................................297,619
College Station city, TX ............................................ 93,857 Estes Park town, CO................................................... 5,858
Colleyville city, TX .................................................... 22,807 Fairview town, TX ...................................................... 7,248
Collinsville city, IL .................................................... 25,579 Farmersville city, TX ................................................... 3,301
Columbia city, SC ....................................................129,272 Farmington Hills city, MI ........................................... 79,740
Columbia Falls city, MT ............................................... 4,688 Fayetteville city, NC.................................................200,564
Columbus city, WI ...................................................... 4,991 Fishers town, IN ...................................................... 76,794
Commerce City city, CO ............................................ 45,913 Flower Mound town, TX............................................ 64,669
Concord city, CA .....................................................122,067 Forest Grove city, OR ............................................... 21,083
Concord town, MA.................................................... 17,668 Fort Collins city, CO .................................................143,986
Coon Rapids city, MN ............................................... 61,476 Fort Lauderdale city, FL ...........................................165,521
Copperas Cove city, TX............................................. 32,032 Fort Smith city, AR ................................................... 86,209
Coronado city, CA .................................................... 18,912 Fort Worth city, TX ..................................................741,206
Corvallis city, OR ...................................................... 54,462 Fountain Hills town, AZ............................................. 22,489
Cottonwood Heights city, UT .................................... 33,433 Franklin city, TN ....................................................... 62,487
Creve Coeur city, MO ............................................... 17,833 Fredericksburg city, VA ............................................. 24,286
Cross Roads town, TX ................................................ 1,563 Fremont city, CA .....................................................214,089
Dacono city, CO ......................................................... 4,152 Friendswood city, TX ................................................ 35,805
Dade City city, FL ....................................................... 6,437 Fruita city, CO.......................................................... 12,646
Dakota County, MN .................................................398,552 Gahanna city, OH ..................................................... 33,248
Dallas city, OR ......................................................... 14,583 Gaithersburg city, MD ............................................... 59,933
Dallas city, TX ...................................................... 1,197,816 Galveston city, TX .................................................... 47,743
Danville city, KY ....................................................... 16,218 Gardner city, KS ....................................................... 19,123
Dardenne Prairie city, MO ......................................... 11,494 Geneva city, NY ....................................................... 13,261
Davenport city, IA .................................................... 99,685 Georgetown city, TX ................................................. 47,400
Davidson town, NC................................................... 10,944 Germantown city, TN ............................................... 38,844
Dayton city, OH ......................................................141,527 Gilbert town, AZ ......................................................208,453
24
Gillette city, WY ....................................................... 29,087 Kettering city, OH .................................................... 56,163
Glendora city, CA ..................................................... 50,073 Key West city, FL ..................................................... 24,649
Glenview village, IL .................................................. 44,692 King City city, CA ..................................................... 12,874
Globe city, AZ ............................................................ 7,532 King County, WA .................................................. 1,931,249
Golden city, CO ........................................................ 18,867 Kirkland city, WA...................................................... 48,787
Golden Valley city, MN.............................................. 20,371 Kirkwood city, MO .................................................... 27,540
Goodyear city, AZ .................................................... 65,275 Knoxville city, IA ........................................................ 7,313
Grafton village, WI ................................................... 11,459 La Mesa city, CA ...................................................... 57,065
Grand Blanc city, MI ................................................... 8,276 La Plata town, MD...................................................... 8,753
Grand Island city, NE ............................................... 48,520 La Porte city, TX ...................................................... 33,800
Grants Pass city, OR ................................................. 34,533 La Vista city, NE ....................................................... 15,758
Grass Valley city, CA................................................. 12,860 Lafayette city, CO .................................................... 24,453
Greenville city, NC .................................................... 84,554 Laguna Beach city, CA .............................................. 22,723
Greenwich town, CT ................................................. 61,171 Laguna Hills city, CA................................................. 30,344
Greenwood Village city, CO....................................... 13,925 Laguna Niguel city, CA ............................................. 62,979
Greer city, SC .......................................................... 25,515 Lake Forest city, IL................................................... 19,375
Guilford County, NC ................................................488,406 Lake Oswego city, OR .............................................. 36,619
Gunnison County, CO ............................................... 15,324 Lake Stevens city, WA .............................................. 28,069
Hailey city, ID ............................................................ 7,960 Lake Worth city, FL .................................................. 34,910
Haines Borough, AK ................................................... 2,508 Lake Zurich village, IL .............................................. 19,631
Hallandale Beach city, FL .......................................... 37,113 Lakeville city, MN ..................................................... 55,954
Hamilton city, OH ..................................................... 62,477 Lakewood city, CO ..................................................142,980
Hanover County, VA ................................................. 99,863 Lakewood city, WA................................................... 58,163
Harrisburg city, SD ..................................................... 4,089 Lane County, OR .....................................................351,715
Harrisonburg city, VA ............................................... 48,914 Lansing city, MI ......................................................114,297
Harrisonville city, MO ............................................... 10,019 Laramie city, WY ...................................................... 30,816
Hayward city, CA ....................................................144,186 Larimer County, CO .................................................299,630
Henderson city, NV .................................................257,729 Las Vegas city, NV ..................................................583,756
Herndon town, VA.................................................... 23,292 Lawrence city, KS..................................................... 87,643
High Point city, NC ..................................................104,371 Lee's Summit city, MO .............................................. 91,364
Highland Park city, IL ............................................... 29,763 Lehi city, UT ............................................................ 47,407
Highlands Ranch CDP, CO ........................................ 96,713 Lenexa city, KS ........................................................ 48,190
Holland city, MI........................................................ 33,051 Lewis County, NY ..................................................... 27,087
Honolulu County, HI ................................................953,207 Lewiston city, ID ...................................................... 31,894
Hooksett town, NH................................................... 13,451 Lewisville city, TX ..................................................... 95,290
Hopkins city, MN ...................................................... 17,591 Libertyville village, IL................................................ 20,315
Hopkinton town, MA................................................. 14,925 Lincoln city, NE .......................................................258,379
Hoquiam city, WA ...................................................... 8,726 Lindsborg city, KS ...................................................... 3,458
Horry County, SC ....................................................269,291 Little Chute village, WI ............................................. 10,449
Howard village, WI................................................... 17,399 Littleton city, CO ...................................................... 41,737
Hudson city, OH ....................................................... 22,262 Livermore city, CA .................................................... 80,968
Hudson town, CO ....................................................... 2,356 Lombard village, IL .................................................. 43,165
Hudsonville city, MI .................................................... 7,116 Lone Tree city, CO ................................................... 10,218
Huntersville town, NC ............................................... 46,773 Long Grove village, IL ................................................ 8,043
Huntley village, IL .................................................... 24,291 Longmont city, CO ................................................... 86,270
Hurst city, TX........................................................... 37,337 Longview city, TX ..................................................... 80,455
Hutchinson city, MN ................................................. 14,178 Lonsdale city, MN ....................................................... 3,674
Hutto city, TX .......................................................... 14,698 Los Alamos County, NM............................................ 17,950
Hyattsville city, MD .................................................. 17,557 Los Altos Hills town, CA .............................................. 7,922
Independence city, MO............................................116,830 Louisville city, CO ..................................................... 18,376
Indian Trail town, NC ............................................... 33,518 Lower Merion township, PA....................................... 57,825
Indianola city, IA ..................................................... 14,782 Lynchburg city, VA ................................................... 75,568
Iowa City city, IA ..................................................... 67,862 Lynnwood city, WA .................................................. 35,836
Irving city, TX .........................................................216,290 Macomb County, MI ................................................840,978
Issaquah city, WA .................................................... 30,434 Manhattan Beach city, CA ......................................... 35,135
Jackson County, MI .................................................160,248 Manhattan city, KS ................................................... 52,281
James City County, VA ............................................. 67,009 Mankato city, MN ..................................................... 39,309
Jefferson County, NY...............................................116,229 Maple Grove city, MN ............................................... 61,567
Jefferson Parish, LA.................................................432,552 Maricopa County, AZ ............................................ 3,817,117
Johnson City city, TN................................................ 63,152 Marshfield city, WI ................................................... 19,118
Johnston city, IA ...................................................... 17,278 Martinez city, CA ...................................................... 35,824
Jupiter town, FL ....................................................... 55,156 Marysville city, WA ................................................... 60,020
Kansas City city, KS.................................................145,786 Matthews town, NC .................................................. 27,198
Kansas City city, MO................................................459,787 McAllen city, TX ......................................................129,877
Keizer city, OR ......................................................... 36,478 McDonough city, GA ................................................. 22,084
Kenmore city, WA .................................................... 20,460 McKinney city, TX....................................................131,117
Kennedale city, TX ..................................................... 6,763 McMinnville city, OR ................................................. 32,187
Kennett Square borough, PA ....................................... 6,072 Menlo Park city, CA .................................................. 32,026
Kent city, WA ........................................................... 92,411 Mercer Island city, WA ............................................. 22,699
Kerrville city, TX ....................................................... 22,347 Meridian charter township, MI .................................. 39,688
25
Meridian city, ID ...................................................... 75,092 Parker town, CO ...................................................... 45,297
Merriam city, KS....................................................... 11,003 Parkland city, FL ...................................................... 23,962
Mesa city, AZ ..........................................................439,041 Pasadena city, CA ...................................................137,122
Mesa County, CO ....................................................146,723 Pasco city, WA ......................................................... 59,781
Miami Beach city, FL ................................................ 87,779 Pasco County, FL ....................................................464,697
Miami city, FL .........................................................399,457 Payette city, ID .......................................................... 7,433
Middleton city, WI .................................................... 17,442 Pearland city, TX ...................................................... 91,252
Midland city, MI ....................................................... 41,863 Peoria city, AZ ........................................................154,065
Milford city, DE .......................................................... 9,559 Peoria city, IL .........................................................115,007
Milton city, GA ......................................................... 32,661 Peoria County, IL ....................................................186,494
Minneapolis city, MN ...............................................382,578 Pflugerville city, TX .................................................. 46,936
Mission Viejo city, CA ............................................... 93,305 Phoenix city, AZ ................................................... 1,445,632
Modesto city, CA .....................................................201,165 Pinehurst village, NC ................................................ 13,124
Monterey city, CA ..................................................... 27,810 Piqua city, OH .......................................................... 20,522
Montgomery County, VA ........................................... 94,392 Pitkin County, CO ..................................................... 17,148
Monticello city, UT...................................................... 1,972 Plano city, TX .........................................................259,841
Monument town, CO .................................................. 5,530 Platte City city, MO..................................................... 4,691
Mooresville town, NC................................................ 32,711 Plymouth city, MN .................................................... 70,576
Moraga town, CA ..................................................... 16,016 Pocatello city, ID ...................................................... 54,255
Morristown city, TN .................................................. 29,137 Polk County, IA .......................................................430,640
Morrisville town, NC ................................................. 18,576 Pompano Beach city, FL ........................................... 99,845
Morro Bay city, CA ................................................... 10,234 Port Orange city, FL ................................................. 56,048
Mountain Village town, CO.......................................... 1,320 Portland city, OR .....................................................583,776
Mountlake Terrace city, WA ...................................... 19,909 Post Falls city, ID ..................................................... 27,574
Murphy city, TX........................................................ 17,708 Powell city, OH ........................................................ 11,500
Naperville city, IL ....................................................141,853 Prince William County, VA........................................402,002
Napoleon city, OH ...................................................... 8,749 Prior Lake city, MN ................................................... 22,796
Needham CDP, MA ................................................... 28,886 Pueblo city, CO .......................................................106,595
New Braunfels city, TX ............................................. 57,740 Purcellville town, VA ................................................... 7,727
New Brighton city, MN .............................................. 21,456 Queen Creek town, AZ ............................................. 26,361
New Hanover County, NC ........................................202,667 Radnor township, PA ................................................ 31,531
New Orleans city, LA ...............................................343,829 Ramsey city, MN ...................................................... 23,668
New Smyrna Beach city, FL ...................................... 22,464 Raymond town, ME .................................................... 4,436
New Ulm city, MN .................................................... 13,522 Raymore city, MO .................................................... 19,206
Newberg city, OR ..................................................... 22,068 Redmond city, OR .................................................... 26,215
Newport city, RI....................................................... 24,672 Redmond city, WA ................................................... 54,144
Newport News city, VA ............................................180,719 Rehoboth Beach city, DE ............................................ 1,327
Newton city, IA ........................................................ 15,254 Reno city, NV..........................................................225,221
Noblesville city, IN ................................................... 51,969 Reston CDP, VA ....................................................... 58,404
Nogales city, AZ ....................................................... 20,837 Richmond city, CA ...................................................103,701
Norcross city, GA ....................................................... 9,116 Richmond Heights city, MO ......................................... 8,603
Norfolk city, VA .......................................................242,803 Rifle city, CO.............................................................. 9,172
North Port city, FL .................................................... 57,357 Rio Rancho city, NM ................................................. 87,521
North Richland Hills city, TX ...................................... 63,343 River Falls city, WI ................................................... 15,000
Northglenn city, CO .................................................. 35,789 Riverside city, CA ....................................................303,871
Novato city, CA ........................................................ 51,904 Riverside city, MO ...................................................... 2,937
Novi city, MI ............................................................ 55,224 Roanoke County, VA ................................................ 92,376
O'Fallon city, IL ........................................................ 28,281 Rochester Hills city, MI ............................................. 70,995
O'Fallon city, MO ...................................................... 79,329 Rock Hill city, SC ...................................................... 66,154
Oak Park village, IL .................................................. 51,878 Rockville city, MD ..................................................... 61,209
Oakland city, CA .....................................................390,724 Roeland Park city, KS ................................................. 6,731
Oakley city, CA ........................................................ 35,432 Rogers city, MN ......................................................... 8,597
Ogdensburg city, NY ................................................ 11,128 Rohnert Park city, CA ............................................... 40,971
Oklahoma City city, OK ............................................579,999 Rolla city, MO .......................................................... 19,559
Olathe city, KS ........................................................125,872 Roselle village, IL ..................................................... 22,763
Old Town city, ME ...................................................... 7,840 Rosemount city, MN ................................................. 21,874
Olmsted County, MN ...............................................144,248 Rosenberg city, TX ................................................... 30,618
Olympia city, WA ..................................................... 46,478 Roseville city, MN ..................................................... 33,660
Orland Park village, IL .............................................. 56,767 Round Rock city, TX ................................................. 99,887
Oshkosh city, WI...................................................... 66,083 Royal Oak city, MI.................................................... 57,236
Oshtemo charter township, MI .................................. 21,705 Saco city, ME ........................................................... 18,482
Otsego County, MI ................................................... 24,164 Sahuarita town, AZ .................................................. 25,259
Oviedo city, FL ......................................................... 33,342 Salida city, CO ........................................................... 5,236
Paducah city, KY ...................................................... 25,024 Sammamish city, WA................................................ 45,780
Palm Beach Gardens city, FL ..................................... 48,452 San Anselmo town, CA ............................................. 12,336
Palm Coast city, FL................................................... 75,180 San Antonio city, TX ............................................. 1,327,407
Palo Alto city, CA ..................................................... 64,403 San Carlos city, CA ................................................... 28,406
Papillion city, NE ...................................................... 18,894 San Diego city, CA ............................................... 1,307,402
Paradise Valley town, AZ .......................................... 12,820 San Francisco city, CA .............................................805,235
Park City city, UT ....................................................... 7,558 San Jose city, CA ....................................................945,942
26
San Juan County, NM ..............................................130,044 Texarkana city, TX ................................................... 36,411
San Marcos city, CA.................................................. 83,781 The Woodlands CDP, TX ........................................... 93,847
San Marcos city, TX .................................................. 44,894 Thornton city, CO....................................................118,772
San Rafael city, CA ................................................... 57,713 Thousand Oaks city, CA ...........................................126,683
Sanford city, FL........................................................ 53,570 Tigard city, OR......................................................... 48,035
Sangamon County, IL ..............................................197,465 Tracy city, CA .......................................................... 82,922
Santa Clarita city, CA ...............................................176,320 Trinidad CCD, CO ..................................................... 12,017
Santa Fe County, NM ..............................................144,170 Tualatin city, OR ...................................................... 26,054
Santa Monica city, CA ............................................... 89,736 Tulsa city, OK .........................................................391,906
Sarasota County, FL ................................................379,448 Twin Falls city, ID .................................................... 44,125
Savage city, MN ....................................................... 26,911 Tyler city, TX ........................................................... 96,900
Schaumburg village, IL ............................................. 74,227 Umatilla city, OR ........................................................ 6,906
Scott County, MN ....................................................129,928 University Park city, TX............................................. 23,068
Scottsdale city, AZ ..................................................217,385 Upper Arlington city, OH ........................................... 33,771
Seaside city, CA ....................................................... 33,025 Urbandale city, IA .................................................... 39,463
Sevierville city, TN.................................................... 14,807 Vail town, CO............................................................. 5,305
Shakopee city, MN ................................................... 37,076 Vancouver city, WA .................................................161,791
Shawnee city, KS ..................................................... 62,209 Ventura CCD, CA .....................................................111,889
Sheboygan city, WI .................................................. 49,288 Vernon Hills village, IL .............................................. 25,113
Sherborn town, MA .................................................... 4,119 Vestavia Hills city, AL ............................................... 34,033
Shoreview city, MN .................................................. 25,043 Victoria city, MN ......................................................... 7,345
Shorewood city, MN ................................................... 7,307 Vienna town, VA ...................................................... 15,687
Shorewood village, IL ............................................... 15,615 Virginia Beach city, VA.............................................437,994
Shorewood village, WI ............................................. 13,162 Wake Forest town, NC.............................................. 30,117
Sierra Vista city, AZ .................................................. 43,888 Walnut Creek city, CA............................................... 64,173
Sioux Center city, IA .................................................. 7,048 Washington County, MN ..........................................238,136
Sioux Falls city, SD ..................................................153,888 Washington town, NH ................................................ 1,123
Skokie village, IL ...................................................... 64,784 Washougal city, WA ................................................. 14,095
Snellville city, GA ..................................................... 18,242 Watauga city, TX ..................................................... 23,497
South Lake Tahoe city, CA ........................................ 21,403 Wauwatosa city, WI ................................................. 46,396
Southborough town, MA ............................................. 9,767 Waverly city, IA ......................................................... 9,874
Southlake city, TX .................................................... 26,575 Weddington town, NC ................................................ 9,459
Spokane Valley city, WA ........................................... 89,755 Wentzville city, MO................................................... 29,070
Spring Hill city, KS...................................................... 5,437 West Carrollton city, OH ........................................... 13,143
Springboro city, OH .................................................. 17,409 West Chester borough, PA ........................................ 18,461
Springfield city, MO .................................................159,498 West Des Moines city, IA .......................................... 56,609
Springville city, UT ................................................... 29,466 Western Springs village, IL ....................................... 12,975
St. Augustine city, FL ............................................... 12,975 Westerville city, OH .................................................. 36,120
St. Charles city, IL.................................................... 32,974 Westlake town, TX ........................................................ 992
St. Cloud city, FL ...................................................... 35,183 Westminster city, CO ...............................................106,114
St. Cloud city, MN .................................................... 65,842 Weston town, MA..................................................... 11,261
St. Joseph city, MO .................................................. 76,780 White House city, TN................................................ 10,255
St. Louis County, MN ...............................................200,226 Wichita city, KS .......................................................382,368
St. Louis Park city, MN ............................................. 45,250 Williamsburg city, VA................................................ 14,068
Stallings town, NC .................................................... 13,831 Willowbrook village, IL ............................................... 8,540
State College borough, PA ........................................ 42,034 Wilmington city, NC.................................................106,476
Steamboat Springs city, CO ...................................... 12,088 Wilsonville city, OR................................................... 19,509
Sterling Heights city, MI ..........................................129,699 Winchester city, VA .................................................. 26,203
Sugar Grove village, IL ............................................... 8,997 Windsor town, CO .................................................... 18,644
Sugar Land city, TX .................................................. 78,817 Windsor town, CT .................................................... 29,044
Suisun City city, CA .................................................. 28,111 Winnetka village, IL ................................................. 12,187
Summit city, NJ........................................................ 21,457 Winston-Salem city, NC ...........................................229,617
Summit County, UT .................................................. 36,324 Winter Garden city, FL.............................................. 34,568
Summit village, IL .................................................... 11,054 Woodbury city, MN................................................... 61,961
Sunnyvale city, CA ..................................................140,081 Woodland city, CA .................................................... 55,468
Surprise city, AZ......................................................117,517 Wrentham town, MA ................................................ 10,955
Suwanee city, GA ..................................................... 15,355 Wyandotte County, KS ............................................157,505
Tacoma city, WA .....................................................198,397 Yakima city, WA ....................................................... 91,067
Takoma Park city, MD .............................................. 16,715 York County, VA....................................................... 65,464
Tamarac city, FL ...................................................... 60,427 Yorktown town, IN ..................................................... 9,405
Temecula city, CA ...................................................100,097 Yountville city, CA ...................................................... 2,933
Tempe city, AZ .......................................................161,719
27
Twin City Metro Area Comparisons

Table 75: Community Characteristics General
Percent positive Rank Number of communities in comparison Comparison to benchmark
The overall quality of life in Shakopee 81% 12 14 Similar
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee 56% 9 10 Lower
Shakopee as a place to live 85% 9 10 Lower
Your neighborhood as a place to live 79% 10 10 Similar
Shakopee as a place to raise children 77% 8 9 Lower
Shakopee as a place to retire 52% 9 9 Lower
Overall appearance of Shakopee 68% 10 10 Similar
Table 76: Community Characteristics by Facet

Number of
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee 79% 8 9 Similar
In your neighborhood during the day 92% 7 9 Similar
In Shakopee's downtown/commercial area during
Safety the day 89% 8 8 Similar
have to visit 80% 8 8 Similar
Availability of paths and walking trails 69% 7 9 Similar
Ease of walking in Shakopee 65% 8 9 Similar
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee 59% 6 9 Similar
Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee 38% 5 6 Similar
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee 83% 4 9 Similar
Ease of public parking 73% NA NA NA
Mobility Traffic flow on major streets 73% 3 8 Similar
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee 76% 7 8 Similar
Natural Cleanliness of Shakopee 78% 8 9 Similar
Environment Air quality 78% 6 6 Similar
Overall "built environment" of Shakopee (including
overall design, buildings, parks and transportation
systems) 61% 6 6 Similar
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee 63% 6 7 Similar
Availability of affordable quality housing 55% 8 9 Similar
Built Variety of housing options 63% 8 10 Similar
Environment Public places where people want to spend time 62% 6 6 Similar
Overall economic health of Shakopee 66% 6 7 Lower
Vibrant downtown/commercial area 32% 5 5 Lower
establishments in Shakopee 57% 10 10 Lower
Cost of living in Shakopee 51% 5 6 Similar
Shopping opportunities 45% 9 10 Lower
Employment opportunities 63% 4 9 Similar
Shakopee as a place to visit 69% 4 6 Similar
Economy Shakopee as a place to work 61% 7 9 Similar
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee 73% 6 7 Similar
Availability of affordable quality mental health care 57% 5 5 Similar
Availability of preventive health services 76% 4 5 Similar
Availability of affordable quality health care 75% 5 6 Similar
Availability of affordable quality food 59% 5 5 Lower
Recreational opportunities 68% 9 9 Similar
Recreation and Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and

Wellness paths or trails, etc.) 62% 6 6 Lower
28
Number of
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 66% 6 7 Lower
events and activities 69% NA NA NA
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 41% 8 8 Lower
Adult educational opportunities 51% 6 6 Lower
Education and K-12 education 70% 7 7 Lower
Enrichment Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool 55% 5 5 Similar
activities 47% 6 6 Similar
Neighborliness of Shakopee 54% 5 6 Similar
people of diverse backgrounds 58% 6 8 Similar
Community Opportunities to participate in community matters 51% 6 6 Similar
Engagement Opportunities to volunteer 59% 8 8 Similar
Table 77: Governance General

Services provided by the City of Shakopee 71% 11 12 Similar
receptionists, planners, etc.) 73% 12 14 Similar
Value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee 47% 14 14 Lower
Overall direction that Shakopee is taking 61% 9 9 Similar
Job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen
involvement 48% 10 10 Similar
Overall confidence in Shakopee government 53% 7 7 Similar
Generally acting in the best interest of the community 55% 7 7 Similar
Being honest 55% 5 5 Lower
Treating all residents fairly 58% 7 7 Similar
Services provided by the Federal Government 49% 3 5 Similar
Table 78: Governance by Facet

Number of
Police services 85% 13 15 Similar
Fire services 91% 13 15 Similar
Crime prevention 75% 8 9 Similar
Fire prevention and education 82% 9 9 Similar
Animal control 69% 11 15 Similar
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare
the community for natural disasters or other
Safety emergency situations) 58% 6 6 Similar
Traffic enforcement 74% 8 9 Similar
Street repair 56% 7 14 Similar
Street cleaning 74% 8 9 Similar
Street lighting 58% 14 15 Similar
Snow removal 73% 7 17 Similar
Sidewalk maintenance 68% 8 10 Similar
Mobility Traffic signal timing 59% 4 9 Similar
Garbage collection 84% 7 8 Similar
Natural Recycling 84% 10 12 Similar
Environment Shakopee open space 59% 7 7 Similar
Built Storm drainage 83% 4 11 Similar
Environment Sewer services 82% 12 12 Similar
29
Number of
Land use, planning and zoning 49% 9 9 Similar
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings,
etc.) 52% 7 9 Similar
Cable television 46% 4 6 Similar
Economy Economic development 66% 5 9 Similar
City parks 82% 9 9 Similar
Recreation and Recreation programs or classes 69% 13 14 Similar
Wellness Recreation centers or facilities 66% 7 8 Similar
Education and
Enrichment City-sponsored special events 57% 6 6 Lower
Community
Engagement Public information services 61% 9 9 Lower

Sense of community 53% 9 10 Similar
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks 84% 6 7 Similar
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years 83% 7 7 Similar
Contacted Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web)
for help or information 41% 6 8 Similar
Table 80: Participation by Facet

Number of
Stocked supplies in preparation for an
emergency 21% NA NA NA
Did NOT report a crime to the police 83% 3 5 Similar
Household member was NOT a victim of a
Safety crime 91% 4 7 Similar
Used bus, rail, subway or other public
transportation instead of driving 14% 4 5 Similar
Carpooled with other adults or children instead
of driving alone 39% 5 5 Similar
Mobility Walked or biked instead of driving 53% 4 5 Similar
Made efforts to conserve water 80% 3 5 Similar
Natural efficient 78% NA NA NA
Environment Recycle at home 95% 4 7 Similar
Did NOT observe a code violation or other
hazard in Shakopee 65% 2 5 Similar
Built Environment NOT experiencing housing costs stress 69% 5 5 Similar
Purchase goods or services from a business
located in Shakopee 94% 5 5 Similar
Economy will have positive impact on income 30% 3 5 Similar
Economy Work inside boundaries of Shakopee 40% 1 5 Higher
Used Shakopee recreation centers or their
services 52% 5 7 Similar
Visited a neighborhood park or City park 87% 5 8 Similar
Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables
a day 83% 4 5 Similar
Participate in moderate or vigorous physical
activity 80% 4 5 Similar
Recreation and
Wellness In very good to excellent health 72% 3 5 Similar
30
Number of
Used Shakopee public libraries or their services 59% 6 7 Similar
Education and Shakopee 40% NA NA NA
Enrichment Attended City-sponsored event 41% 4 5 Similar
Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause
or candidate 19% NA NA NA
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-
person, phone, email or web) to express your
opinion 13% 4 5 Similar
Volunteered your time to some group/activity
in Shakopee 31% 5 8 Similar
Participated in a club 19% 5 7 Similar
Talked to or visited with your immediate
neighbors 91% 3 5 Similar
Done a favor for a neighbor 76% 5 5 Similar
Attended a local public meeting 16% 5 8 Similar
Watched (online or on television) a local public
meeting 21% 5 8 Similar
Read or watch local news (via television,
Community paper, computer, etc.) 86% 4 5 Similar
Engagement Vote in local elections 86% 3 7 Similar
Communities included in Twin City Metro Area comparisons

The communities included in Shakopees custom comparisons are listed below along with their population
according to the 2010 Census.
Blaine city, MN ......................................................... 57,186 New Brighton city, MN .............................................. 21,456

Bloomington city, MN ............................................... 82,893 Plymouth city, MN .................................................... 70,576
Chanhassen city, MN ................................................ 22,952 Prior Lake city, MN ................................................... 22,796
Coon Rapids city, MN ............................................... 61,476 Rosemount city, MN ................................................. 21,874
Edina city, MN ......................................................... 47,941 Savage city, MN ....................................................... 26,911
Elk River city, MN ..................................................... 22,974 Shakopee city, MN ................................................... 37,076
Golden Valley city, MN.............................................. 20,371 Shoreview city, MN .................................................. 25,043
Hopkins city, MN ...................................................... 17,591 St. Cloud city, MN .................................................... 65,842
Maple Grove city, MN ............................................... 61,567 St. Louis Park city, MN ............................................. 45,250
Minneapolis city, MN ...............................................382,578 Woodbury city, MN................................................... 61,961
31
Appendix C: Detailed Survey Methods

The National Citizen Survey (The NCS), conducted by National Research Center, Inc., was developed to provide
communities an accurate, affordable and easy way to assess and interpret resident opinion about important local
topics. Standardization of common questions and survey methods provide the rigor to assure valid results, and
each community has enough flexibility to construct a customized version of The NCS.
Results offer insight into residents perspectives about the community as a whole, including local amenities,
services, public trust, resident participation and other aspects of the community in order to support budgeting,
land use and strategic planning and communication with residents. Resident demographic characteristics permit
comparison to the Census as well as comparison of results for different subgroups of residents. The City of
Shakopee funded this research. Please contact Nathan Burkett, Assistant City Administrator of the City of
Shakopee, at Nburkett@shakopeemn.gov if you have any questions about the survey.
Survey Validity
The question of survey validity has two parts: 1) how can a community be confident that the results from those
who completed the questionnaire are representative of the results that would have been obtained had the survey
been administered to the entire population? and 2) how closely do the perspectives recorded on the survey reflect
what residents really believe or do?
To answer the first question, the best survey research practices were used for the resources spent to ensure that
the results from the survey respondents reflect the opinions of residents in the entire community. These practices
include:
Using a mail-out/mail-back methodology, which typically gets a higher response rate than phone for the same
dollars spent. A higher response rate lessens the worry that those who did not respond are different than those
who did respond.
Selecting households at random within the community to receive the survey to ensure that the households
selected to receive the survey are representative of the larger community.
Over-sampling multi-family housing units to improve response from hard-to-reach, lower income or younger
apartment dwellers.
Selecting the respondent within the household using an unbiased sampling procedure; in this case, the
birthday method. The cover letter included an instruction requesting that the respondent in the household
be the adult (18 years old or older) who most recently had a birthday, irrespective of year of birth.
Contacting potential respondents three times to encourage response from people who may have different
opinions or habits than those who would respond with only a single prompt.
Inviting response in a compelling manner (using appropriate letterhead/logos and a signature of a visible
leader) to appeal to recipients sense of civic responsibility.
Providing a pre-addressed, postage-paid return envelope.
Offering the survey in Spanish or other language when requested by a given community.
Weighting the results to reflect the demographics of the population.
The answer to the second question about how closely the perspectives recorded on the survey reflect what
residents really believe or do is more complex. Resident responses to surveys are influenced by a variety of factors.
For questions about service quality, residents expectations for service quality play a role as well as the objective
quality of the service provided, the way the resident perceives the entire community (that is, the context in which
the service is provided), the scale on which the resident is asked to record his or her opinion and, of course, the
opinion, itself, that a resident holds about the service. Similarly a residents report of certain behaviors is colored
by what he or she believes is the socially desirable response (e.g., reporting tolerant behaviors toward oppressed
groups, likelihood of voting for a tax increase for services to poor people, use of alternative modes of travel to
work besides the single occupancy vehicle), his or her memory of the actual behavior (if it is not a question
speculating about future actions, like a vote), his or her confidence that he or she can be honest without suffering
any negative consequences (thus the need for anonymity) as well as the actual behavior itself.
How closely survey results come to recording the way a person really feels or behaves often is measured by the
coincidence of reported behavior with observed current behavior (e.g., driving habits), reported intentions to
behave with observed future behavior (e.g., voting choices) or reported opinions about current community quality
32
with objective characteristics of the community (e.g., feelings of safety correlated with rates of crime). There is a
body of scientific literature that has investigated the relationship between reported behaviors and actual
behaviors. Well-conducted surveys, by and large, do capture true respondent behaviors or intentions to act with
great accuracy. Predictions of voting outcomes tend to be quite accurate using survey research, as do reported
behaviors that are not about highly sensitive issues (e.g., family abuse or other illegal or morally sanctioned
activities). For self-reports about highly sensitive issues, statistical adjustments can be made to correct for the
respondents tendency to report what they think the correct response should be.
Research on the correlation of resident opinion about service quality and objective ratings of service quality
vary, with some showing stronger relationships than others. NRCs own research has demonstrated that residents
who report the lowest ratings of street repair live in communities with objectively worse street conditions than
those who report high ratings of street repair (based on road quality, delay in street repair, number of road repair
employees). Similarly, the lowest rated fire services appear to be objectively worse than the highest rated fire
services (expenditures per capita, response time, professional status of firefighters, breadth of services and
training provided). Resident opinion commonly reflects objective performance data but is an important measure
on its own. NRC principals have written, If you collect trash three times a day but residents think that your trash
haul is lousy, you still have a problem.
Survey Sampling
Sampling refers to the method by which households were chosen to receive the survey. All households within the
City of Shakopee were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving
Shakopee was purchased based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip
codes that serve the City of Shakopee households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the
exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current
municipal boundary file (updated on a quarterly basis) and addresses located outside of the City of Shakopee
boundaries were removed from consideration. Each address identified as being within City boundaries was
further identified as being within one of six subareas. It is worth noting that while Shakopee has six subareas, no
surveys were sent to subarea six because no households exist in that area.
To choose the 1,500 survey recipients, a systematic sampling method was applied to the list of households
previously screened for geographic location. Systematic sampling is a procedure whereby a complete list of all
possible households is culled, selecting every Nth one, giving each eligible household a known probability of
selection, until the appropriate number of households is selected. Multi-family housing units were over sampled
as residents of this type of housing typically respond at lower rates to surveys than do those in single-family
housing units. Figure 1 displays a map of the households selected to receive the survey. In general, because of the
random sampling techniques used, the displayed sampling density will closely mirror the overall housing unit
density (which may be different from the population density). While the theory of probability assumes no bias in
selection, there may be some minor variations in practice (meaning, an area with only 15% of the housing units
might be sampled at an actual rate that is slightly above or below that).
An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a
person within the household by asking the person whose birthday has most recently passed to complete the
questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people
respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the cover letter accompanying the questionnaire.
In addition to the scientific, random sample, a link to an online opt-in survey was publicized and posted to the
City of Shakopee website. This opt-in survey was identical to the scientific survey and open to all City residents.
33
Figure 1: Location of Survey Recipients
Survey Administration and Response

Selected households received three mailings, one week apart, beginning on November 14, 2016. The first mailing
was a prenotification postcard announcing the upcoming survey. The next mailing contained a letter from the
Mayor inviting the household to participate, a questionnaire and a postage-paid return envelope. The final mailing
contained a reminder letter, another survey and a postage-paid return envelope. The second cover letter asked
those who had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from turning in
another survey. Completed surveys were collected over the following seven weeks. The online opt-in survey
became available to all residents on December 19th, 2016 and was open for two weeks.
About 2% of the 1,500 surveys mailed were returned because the housing unit was vacant or the postal service was
unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 1,472 households that received the survey, 410
completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 28%. Of the 410 completed surveys, 31 were
completed online. Additionally, responses were tracked by area; response rates by subarea ranged from 25% to
41%. An additional 423 residents completed the online opt-in survey (please see the Supplemental Web Report
under separate cover).
34
Table 81: Survey Response Rates by Area
Number mailed Undeliverable Eligible Returned Response rate
Subarea 1 418 14 404 102 25%
Subarea 2 595 7 588 156 27%
Subarea 3 255 4 251 81 32%
Subarea 4 195 3 192 56 29%
Subarea 5 37 0 37 15 41%
Overall 1,500 28 1,472 410 28%
Confidence Intervals
It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a level of confidence and
accompanying confidence interval (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here,
is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey
results because some residents opinions are relied on to estimate all residents opinions. 1
The margin of error for the City of Shakopee survey is no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around
any given percent reported for the entire sample (410 completed surveys).
For subgroups of responses, the margin of error increases because the sample size for the subgroup is smaller. For
subgroups of approximately 100 respondents, the margin of error is plus or minus 10 percentage points.
Survey Processing (Data Entry)

Upon receipt, completed surveys were assigned a unique identification number. Additionally, each survey was
reviewed and cleaned as necessary. For example, a question may have asked a respondent to pick two items out
of a list of five, but the respondent checked three; in this case, NRC would use protocols to randomly choose two
of the three selected items for inclusion in the dataset.
All surveys then were entered twice into an electronic dataset; any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to
the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed.
NRC used Qualtrics, a web-based survey and analytics platform, to collect the online survey data. Use of an online
system means all collected data are entered into the dataset when the respondents submit the surveys. Skip
patterns are programmed into system so respondents are automatically skipped to the appropriate question
based on the individual responses being given. Online programming also allows for more rigid control of the data
format, making extensive data cleaning unnecessary.
A series of quality control checks were also performed in order to ensure the integrity of the web data. Steps may
include and not be limited to reviewing the data for clusters of repeat IP addresses and time stamps (indicating
duplicate responses) and removing empty submissions (questionnaires submitted with no questions answered).
Survey Data Weighting

The demographic characteristics of the survey sample were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and
American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Shakopee. The primary objective of weighting
survey data is to make the survey sample reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics
used for weighting were housing tenure (rent or own), housing type (attached or detached), race, sex and age. The
results of the weighting scheme are presented in the following table.
1
A 95% confidence interval indicates that for every 100 random samples of this many residents, 95 of the confidence intervals created will
include the true population response. This theory is applied in practice to mean that the true perspective of the target population lies
within the confidence interval created for a single survey. For example, if 75% of residents rate a service as excellent or good, then the
4% margin of error (for the 95% confidence interval) indicates that the range of likely responses for the entire community is between 71%
and 79%. This source of uncertainty is called sampling error. In addition to sampling error, other sources of error may affect any survey,
including the non-response of residents with opinions different from survey responders. Though standardized on The NCS, on other surveys,
differences in question wording, order, translation and data entry, as examples, can lead to somewhat varying results.
35
Table 82: Shakopee, MN 2017 Weighting Table
Characteristic Population Norm Unweighted Data Weighted Data
Housing
Rent home 23% 10% 21%
Own home 77% 90% 79%
Detached unit 58% 71% 60%
Attached unit 42% 29% 40%
Race and Ethnicity
White 80% 90% 81%
Not white 20% 10% 19%
Not Hispanic 93% 98% 96%
Hispanic 7% 2% 4%
Sex and Age
Female 51% 50% 51%
Male 49% 50% 49%
18-34 years of age 36% 15% 35%
35-54 years of age 44% 43% 44%
55+ years of age 20% 42% 21%
Females 18-34 19% 10% 18%
Females 35-54 21% 21% 22%
Females 55+ 11% 19% 11%
Males 18-34 18% 6% 18%
Males 35-54 22% 21% 23%
Males 55+ 9% 23% 9%
Area
Subarea 1 25% 25% 22%
Subarea 2 39% 38% 43%
Subarea 3 19% 20% 21%
Subarea 4 15% 14% 12%
Subarea 5 2% 4% 2%
Survey Data Analysis and Reporting

The survey dataset was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). For the most part,
the percentages presented in the reports represent the percent positive. The percent positive is the combination
of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent and good, very safe and somewhat safe,
essential and very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive
represents the proportion of respondents indicating yes or participating in an activity at least once a month.
On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer dont know. The proportion of respondents
giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in Appendix A. However, these responses have been
removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses
from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item.
36
Appendix D: Survey Materials
37
Dear Shakopee Resident, Dear Shakopee Resident,
It wont take much of your time to make a big difference! It wont take much of your time to make a big difference!
Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey
about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days. about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days.
Thank you for helping create a better city! Thank you for helping create a better city!
Sincerely, Sincerely,
Bill Mars Bill Mars

Mayor Mayor
Dear Shakopee Resident, Dear Shakopee Resident,
It wont take much of your time to make a big difference! It wont take much of your time to make a big difference!
Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey Your household has been randomly selected to participate in a survey
about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days. about your community. Your survey will arrive in a few days.
Thank you for helping create a better city! Thank you for helping create a better city!
Sincerely, Sincerely,
Bill Mars Bill Mars

Mayor Mayor
Presorted Presorted
First Class Mail First Class Mail
US Postage US Postage
PAID PAID
Boulder, CO Boulder, CO
Permit NO. 94 Permit NO. 94
City of Shakopee City of Shakopee

129 Holmes Street South 129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379 Shakopee, MN 55379
Presorted Presorted
First Class Mail First Class Mail
US Postage US Postage
PAID PAID
Boulder, CO Boulder, CO
Permit NO. 94 Permit NO. 94
City of Shakopee City of Shakopee

129 Holmes Street South 129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379 Shakopee, MN 55379
November 2016
Dear City of Shakopee Resident:
Please help us shape the future of Shakopee! You have been selected at random to participate in
the 2016 Shakopee Citizen Survey.
Please take a few minutes to fill out the enclosed survey. Your participation in this survey is very
important especially since your household is one of only a small number of households being
surveyed. Your feedback will help Shakopee make decisions that affect our city.
A few things to remember:

Your responses are completely anonymous.
In order to hear from a diverse group of residents, the adult 18 years or older in your
household who most recently had a birthday should complete this survey.
You may return the survey by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or
you can complete the survey online at:
www.n-r-c.com/survey/shakopee.htm
If you have any questions about the survey please call 952-233-9310.
Thank you for your time and participation!
Sincerely,
Bill Mars
Mayor
COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857

129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1351 952-233-9300 FAX 952-233-3801 www.ShakopeeMN.gov
November 2016
Dear City of Shakopee Resident:
Heres a second chance if you havent already responded to the 2016 Shakopee Citizen Survey!
(If you completed it and sent it back, we thank you for your time and ask you to
recycle this survey. Please do not respond twice.)
Please help us shape the future of Shakopee! You have been selected at random to participate in
the 2016 Shakopee Citizen Survey.
Please take a few minutes to fill out the enclosed survey. Your participation in this survey is very
important especially since your household is one of only a small number of households being
surveyed. Your feedback will help Shakopee make decisions that affect our city.
A few things to remember:

Your responses are completely anonymous.
In order to hear from a diverse group of residents, the adult 18 years or older in your
household who most recently had a birthday should complete this survey.
You may return the survey by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or
you can complete the survey online at:
www.n-r-c.com/survey/shakopee.htm
If you have any questions about the survey please call 952-233-9310.
Thank you for your time and participation!
Sincerely,
Bill Mars
Mayor
COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857

129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1351 952-233-9300 FAX 952-233-3801 www.ShakopeeMN.gov
The City of Shakopee 2016 Citizen Survey
Please complete this questionnaire if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a
birthday. The adults year of birth does not matter. Please select the response (by circling the number or checking the box)
that most closely represents your opinion for each question. Your responses are anonymous and will be reported in group
form only.
1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Shakopee:
Excellent Good Fair Poor Dont know
Shakopee as a place to live...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Your neighborhood as a place to live ...............................................................1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to raise children ...............................................................1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to work ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to visit ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee as a place to retire ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
The overall quality of life in Shakopee .............................................................1 2 3 4 5
2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Shakopee as a whole:
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit ...........................1 2 3 4 5
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee ........................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall built environment of Shakopee (including overall design,
buildings, parks and transportation systems) .................................................1 2 3 4 5
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee................................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment ........................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall economic health of Shakopee ..............................................................1 2 3 4 5
Sense of community ........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall image or reputation of Shakopee.........................................................1 2 3 4 5
3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following:
Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Dont
likely likely unlikely unlikely know
Recommend living in Shakopee to someone who asks .......................... 1 2 3 4 5
Remain in Shakopee for the next five years .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5
4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:
Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Dont
safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know
In your neighborhood during the day .................................. 1 2 3 4 5 6
In Shakopees downtown/commercial
areas during the day ......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6
Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Ease of public parking .....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Ease of travel by car in Shakopee.....................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Ease of travel by public transportation in Shakopee .........................................1 2 3 4 5
Ease of travel by bicycle in Shakopee ...............................................................1 2 3 4 5
Ease of walking in Shakopee ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Availability of paths and walking trails .............................................................1 2 3 4 5
Air quality .......................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Cleanliness of Shakopee...................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall appearance of Shakopee .....................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Public places where people want to spend time ................................................1 2 3 4 5
Variety of housing options ...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality housing .........................................................1 2 3 4 5
Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)...........1 2 3 4 5
Recreational opportunities...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality food ..............................................................1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality health care ....................................................1 2 3 4 5
Availability of preventive health services ..........................................................1 2 3 4 5
Availability of affordable quality mental health care ........................................1 2 3 4 5
Page 1 of 5
Availability of affordable quality child care/preschool .....................................1 2 3 4 5
K-12 education................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Adult educational opportunities .......................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities ......................................1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities .........1 2 3 4 5
Employment opportunities ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Shopping opportunities....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Cost of living in Shakopee ...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall quality of business and service establishments in Shakopee..................1 2 3 4 5
Vibrant downtown/commercial areas .............................................................1 2 3 4 5
Overall quality of new development in Shakopee.............................................1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to participate in social events and activities................................1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to volunteer...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Opportunities to participate in community matters..........................................1 2 3 4 5
Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of
diverse backgrounds .....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Neighborliness of residents in Shakopee...........................................................1 2 3 4 5
7. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.
No Yes
Made efforts to conserve water ........................................................................................................................... 1 2
Made efforts to make your home more energy efficient....................................................................................... 1 2
Observed a code violation or other hazard in Shakopee (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ................................ 1 2
Household member was a victim of a crime in Shakopee .................................................................................... 1 2
Reported a crime to the police in Shakopee ........................................................................................................ 1 2
Stocked supplies in preparation for an emergency .............................................................................................. 1 2
Campaigned or advocated for an issue, cause or candidate ................................................................................. 1 2
Contacted the City of Shakopee (in-person, phone, email or web) for help or information .................................. 1 2
Contacted Shakopee elected officials (in-person, phone, email or web) to express your opinion........................... 1 2
8. In the last 12 months, about how many times, if at all, have you or other household members done each of the
following in Shakopee?
2 times a 2-4 times Once a month Not
week or more a month or less at all
Used Shakopee recreation centers or their services ......................................................... 1 2 3 4
Visited a neighborhood park or City park ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4
The National Citizen Survey 2001-2016 National Research Center, Inc.

Used Shakopee public libraries or their services .............................................................. 1 2 3 4
Participated in religious or spiritual activities in Shakopee .............................................. 1 2 3 4
Attended a City-sponsored event .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4
Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving .............................................. 1 2 3 4
Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone .................................... 1 2 3 4
Walked or biked instead of driving.................................................................................. 1 2 3 4
Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Shakopee............................................ 1 2 3 4
Participated in a club ...................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4
Talked to or visited with your immediate neighbors........................................................ 1 2 3 4
Done a favor for a neighbor............................................................................................ 1 2 3 4
Visited downtown Shakopee ........................................................................................... 1 2 3 4
9. Thinking about local public meetings (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners,
advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.), in the last 12 months, about how many times, if
at all, have you or other household members attended or watched a local public meeting?
2 times a 2-4 times Once a month Not
week or more a month or less at all
Attended a local public meeting ..................................................................................... 1 2 3 4
Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting ................................................. 1 2 3 4
Page 2 of 5
10. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Shakopee:
Police services ..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Fire services .....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Crime prevention ............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Fire prevention and education .........................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Traffic enforcement .........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Street repair ....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Street cleaning .................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Street lighting ..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Snow removal..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Sidewalk maintenance .....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Traffic signal timing ........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Garbage collection...........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Recycling.........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Storm drainage ................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Sewer services..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
City parks ........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Recreation programs or classes ........................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Recreation centers or facilities .........................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Land use, planning and zoning ........................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.)......................................1 2 3 4 5
Animal control ................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Economic development ...................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Public information services ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Cable television ...............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for
natural disasters or other emergency situations) ............................................1 2 3 4 5
Shakopee open space .......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
City-sponsored special events...........................................................................1 2 3 4 5
receptionists, planners, etc.) ............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?
The City of Shakopee ......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
The Federal Government ................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Scott County Government...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
12. Please rate the following categories of Shakopee government performance:
The value of services for the taxes paid to Shakopee ........................................1 2 3 4 5
The overall direction that Shakopee is taking...................................................1 2 3 4 5
The job Shakopee government does at welcoming citizen involvement............1 2 3 4 5
Overall confidence in Shakopee government ...................................................1 2 3 4 5
Generally acting in the best interest of the community .....................................1 2 3 4 5
Being honest ....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Treating all residents fairly ..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Page 3 of 5
13. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Shakopee community to focus on each of the
following in the coming two years:
Very Somewhat Not at all
Essential important important important
Overall feeling of safety in Shakopee............................................................................... 1 2 3 4
Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit .......................................... 1 2 3 4
Quality of overall natural environment in Shakopee ....................................................... 1 2 3 4
Overall built environment of Shakopee (including overall design,
buildings, parks and transportation systems) ............................................................... 1 2 3 4
Health and wellness opportunities in Shakopee............................................................... 1 2 3 4
Overall opportunities for education and enrichment ....................................................... 1 2 3 4
Overall economic health of Shakopee ............................................................................. 1 2 3 4
Sense of community ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4
14. To what degree would you support or oppose a more active/strong approach by the City in enforcement of
residential property codes?
Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Dont know
15. Which of these items, if any, would attract you to Downtown Shakopee more often (please select the one item
that would attract you most)?
Retail
Public amenities
Public events
Restaurants
16. Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining
information about the City government and its activities, events and services:
Major Minor Not a
source source source
City website (www.ShakopeeMN.gov) ............................................................................................... 1 2 3
Shakopee Valley News....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3
Star Tribune...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3
Local government cable channel (Comcast 16/CenturyLink 240)...................................................... 1 2 3
City Newsletter (Hometown Messenger/Parks and Recreation Activity Brochure)............................. 1 2 3
Talking with City officials .................................................................................................................. 1 2 3
City communications via social media ............................................................................................... 1 2 3
Word-of-mouth ................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3
Email (E-News, eNotifications) .......................................................................................................... 1 2 3
The National Citizen Survey 2001-2016 National Research Center, Inc.

17. Please indicate how important, if at all, each of the following projects and issues will be for the City to address
over the next five years?
Very Somewhat Not at all Dont
Essential important important important know
Redeveloping downtown ..........................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Improving the riverfront at Huber Park ....................................................1 2 3 4 5
Enhancement and preservation of natural resources and open space
within the City ......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Improving access to public transportation.................................................1 2 3 4 5
Construction of a third Fire Station to improve fire and emergency
response times .......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
18. What do you think is the most serious issue facing Shakopee today?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
19. If you ever feel unsafe in Shakopee, please provide a specific reason for this:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 5
Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are
completely anonymous and will be reported in group form only.
D1. How often, if at all, do you do each of the following, considering all of the times you could?
Never Rarely Sometimes Usually Always
Recycle at home...........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
Purchase goods or services from a business located in Shakopee ...................1 2 3 4 5
Eat at least 5 portions of fruits and vegetables a day .....................................1 2 3 4 5
Participate in moderate or vigorous physical activity ....................................1 2 3 4 5
Read or watch local news (via television, paper, computer, etc.) ...................1 2 3 4 5
Vote in local elections ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5
D2. Would you say that in general your health is:
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you
think the impact will be:
Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative
D4. What is your employment status? D12. How much do you anticipate your households
Working full time for pay total income before taxes will be for the current
Working part time for pay year? (Please include in your total income money
Unemployed, looking for paid work from all sources for all persons living in your
Unemployed, not looking for paid work household.)
Fully retired Less than $25,000
D5. Do you work inside the boundaries of Shakopee? $25,000 to $49,999
Yes, outside the home $50,000 to $99,999
Yes, from home $100,000 to $149,999
No $150,000 or more
D6. How many years have you lived in Shakopee? Please respond to both questions D13 and D14:
Less than 2 years 11-20 years D13. Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?
2-5 years More than 20 years No, not Spanish, Hispanic or Latino
6-10 years Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic
D7. Which best describes the building you live in? or Latino
One family house detached from any other houses
D14. What is your race? (Mark one or more races
Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome,
to indicate what race you consider yourself
apartment or condominium)
to be.)
Mobile home
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Other
Asian, Asian Indian or Pacific Islander
D8. Is this house, apartment or mobile home... Black or African American
Rented White
Owned Other
D9. About how much is your monthly housing cost D15. In which category is your age?
for the place you live (including rent, mortgage 18-24 years 55-64 years
payment, property tax, property insurance and 25-34 years 65-74 years
homeowners association (HOA) fees)? 35-44 years 75 years or older
Less than $300 per month 45-54 years
$300 to $599 per month
D16. What is your sex?
$600 to $999 per month
Female Male
$1,000 to $1,499 per month
$1,500 to $2,499 per month D17. Do you consider a cell phone or land line your
$2,500 or more per month primary telephone number?
Cell Land line Both
D10. Do any children 17 or under live in your
household?
No Yes
D11. Are you or any other members of your household Thank you for completing this survey. Please
aged 65 or older? return the completed survey in the postage-paid
No Yes envelope to: National Research Center, Inc.,
PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502
Page 5 of 5
City of Shakopee Presorted
129 Holmes Street South First Class Mail
Shakopee, MN 55379 US Postage
PAID
Boulder, CO
Permit NO.94
C.3.

MEMO
FROM: Nate Burkett

Subject:
Presentation on City Hall Construction Status, and request to approve execution of contracts for
Furnishings, including work stations, conference rooms and common areas; Audio Visual Equipment
and Installation, including systems in Council Chambers, conference rooms and other locations
throughout the new City Hall building; and Low Voltage equipment and installation throughout the
building, including connections to the Data Center in the PD and fiberoptic cabling.
Approval by motion of contracts with Tierney Brothers, Fluid Interiors, and a low voltage contractor
TBD.
Recommendation:
Approve execution of a contract in the amount not to exceed $350,000, with Fluid Interiors for work
stations, conference room furniture and commons area furniture at the new Shakopee City Hall.
Approve execution of a contract in the amount of $107,377.29 with Tierney Brothers for audio visual
equipment and installation at the new Shakopee City Hall.
Approve execution of a contract in an amount to be presented at the Council meeting with a vendor to
be presented at the Council meeting for installation of low voltage cables and equipment at the new
Shakopee City Hall.
Discussion:
Construction Status
New substantial completion date of July 3, 2017
Construction slowed primarily due to wet weather in late summer and fall months
Working with construction managers and trades to assess the possibility of partial completion so
June 6, 2017 Council meeting may be held at new City Hall (provides for greater amount of time
to move broadcasting equipment)
Building is fully roofed (with exception of exterior canopies), and dry - weather should play less
of a factor in achieving substantial completion by revised date
As of 1/19/2017, 27% of the project budget has been expended, just over $244,000 of
contingency budget remains (approx 58% of total).
Contingency issues are typically minimal at this stage in a project and forward.
Contract with Fluid

Staff has worked to identify and plan to use furniture from the existing City Hall to the greatest
extent possible. Desks, chairs, etc... that are functional and usable are being transferred to the
new building, lowering the cost.
Not all available space is being filled at this time, should the need for more work stations arise,
those work stations may be purchased at that time.
Plans call for lower cost, high quality finishes, similar to the finishes in the Police Department.
Original budget for furniture, fixtures and equipment at $470,000.
Purchase being made off of State Contract.
Contract with Tierney Brothers

Initial contract proposal was almost $180,000, staff worked to identify value engineering
opportunities - decreased costs by reducing automation and equipment; primarily in staff only
conference rooms.
Contract includes equipment and cabling needed to ensure Council chambers is ready for
broadcast and meets expectations; other equipment to outfit meeting rooms for presentations and
expected uses.
Staff plans to purchase certain items directly from other sources (primarily TV's) to control
costs.
Purchase of equipment and labor being made off of State contract.
Contract for Low Voltage

Bid opening to occur on Feb 7, 2017 at 2 pm. Therefore, the amount and vendor are unknown at
the time of agenda publication.
Contract includes work to cable networks to offices and other locations throughout the building,
providing certain equipment related to data networks, etc...
Also includes fiberoptic connections to data center in PD and an option for installation of a
fiberoptic cable to the corner of Gorman and Marschall to ensure data continuity in the event of
a disruption.
Budget Impact:
ATTACHMENTS:
Tierney Contract
Low Voltage Contract
3300 University Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326
www.tierneybrothers.com
612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax - 612.331.3424
Thursday, October 06, 2016
City of Shakopee
Proposal for Audio-Visual Service

RE: City Hall
Opportunity Number: 11466 R4
(This client requested revision includes new items, in italics and bolded. Strikeouts
denote items removed per this and any previous revision.)
Scope of Integration Services
Summary of Work to be completed by Tierney Brothers, Inc. at 129 Holmes Street South,
Shakopee MN, 55379.
(Please initial if address is correct or provide correct address. ____________ )
11466 City of Shakopee A 72214 - Council Chambers (Revision 4)

The AV system in the new council chambers will use most of the equipment from the existing
Council chambers. It will be de-installed, moved and re-installed in the new facility.
The projector and screen will not be reused in the new Council Chambers, it will be used in the
Training Room, 220. The Council Chambers will have two wall (or ceiling) mounted 90 LED
monitors as the main displays. Each seat on the dais will have its own monitor which will be
moved from the existing room.
There will also be one 58 LED monitors in the Lobby. This monitor will be wall mounted to the
balcony face. This monitor will be used for overflow viewing and digital signage. There will
also be a 50 LED monitor installed on a side wall near the rear of the room to function as a
confidence monitor for the dais. This monitor will display the live TV feed.
There will be two input locations at the dais, one at each staff side. In the presenters lectern
there will be inputs for a dedicated computer and a guest laptop.
A ring of adaptors including display port to HDMI is included to accommodate various

computer output types.
Two new HD ceiling document cameras will also provide an input to the system. One camera
will view items on the presenters lectern. The camera has a laser spot to indicate the center
of the viewing area. The Second camera will be used during non-council meetings and its
location is to be determined. The general contractor will cut the ceiling as needed for both
cameras.
All inputs will feed the Crestron Digital Media Matrix switcher. Additional input cards will be
added to accommodate more inputs than in the current room. Additional outputs will be
accomplished using the existing output cards with some additional transmitters and receivers
for signal extension. The switcher will be at its max capacity.
The Broadcast system will be moved from the existing room and re-installed in the new facility.
The six existing cameras installed within the room as shown on the plans. The existing
equipment racks will moved. Recording, streaming, and Cable feeds will remain as is. A new
monitor will be installed in the Council chamber as a confidence monitor as discussed above.
A 65 LED monitor on a mobile cart will be provided for use during non-council meetings in the
room. This will have A video feed plate, with a built in receiver, will be mounted to the front of
the dais. The receiver will be mounted on the monitor. The image of this output will be the
same as the images on the wall mounted monitors. The monitor has additional input so that it
can be used in other spaces and inputs connected directly to the monitor. Monitor control will
be manual at the monitor.
The audio system will be moved from the existing facility to the new facility. There will be wired
mics on the dais and a pair of wireless mics for use in the room. A new floor box will be
installed with sixteen wired mic inputs for non-council meetings.
The speaker system in the new room will be different than in the existing room. There will be
five small, 1 gang box sized, speakers mounted on the dais providing sound to the council and
staff members. These will be mounted in surface mounting boxes. There will be two black
pendent speakers installed above the audience area for sound to the audience. These
speakers will hang between the ceiling slats and will be close to the ceiling. In the Lobby there
will be two wall mounted speakers mounted above the glass wall of the Council chambers.
These will provide overflow audio to the lobby. The control room will use the existing speaker
for audio in the control room.
Control will be handled through two touch panels. One 10 wired touch panel will be the
control point in the control room and a second, 8.7 wireless touch panel will be used in the
council chambers. The charging base for the wireless panel will be a one of the staff positions.
The Crestron will control monitors on/off, input selection and routing, and other functions as it
currently does in the existing room. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed(s) and
receiver(s).
A new On Air lite will be installed in the council chambers.
The existing assistive listening system will be moved from the current Council Chambers to the
new room.
The existing equipment racks will be reused to house system equipment. The existing digital
signage system server will also be moved to the new location.
B and C 72312 and 72316 Executive Conference room 111 (revision 4) and Conference
room 148
These two rooms will have the same AV system installed for presentations. Web conferencing
capabilities can be added but are not included in this proposal.
There will be a 65 LED monitor on the front wall of the rooms. An in-wall box will be provided
for installation by the owner at the monitor locations. This box will house system equipment.
Inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer at the table, and Cable TV will be
available. It is assumed the dedicated computer is a small form factor computer mounted
behind the monitor.
At the table a Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power outlets, and
connections for HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers will cut the
table for the Cable Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video signal
extension to the monitor. Cables will run through an owner provided floor box. A disconnect
in the floor box is planned.
An adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple
Lighting connectors to HDMI.
Audio will be heard from the monitors speakers.
An Extron Media Link Controller, button panel controller, will be installed on the wall for control
of the system. It will control monitor on/off, input selection, and volume. The Cable TV
receivers remote will be used for control of the receiver.
The owner is responsible for the installation of the in-wall box at the monitor location with two
duplex electrical outlets in the box. The owner will provide the cable pathway from the table
to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver.
C 72316 Conference room 148 (Revision 4)
There will be a 65 LED monitor on the front wall of the room.
Inputs for a dedicated computer at the table and Cable TV will be available. (no guest input is
included) At the table a Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power
outlets, and connections for HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers
will cut the table for the Cable Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video
signal extension to the monitor. Cables will run through an owner provided floor box. A
disconnect in the floor box is planned.
The monitors remote will be used for control of the monitor.
The owner is responsible for a quad electrical outlet at the monitor location. The owner will
provide the cable pathway from the table to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable
TV feed and receiver. No in wall box or adapter ring is included in this revision.
D 83368 Community Room 108 (Revision 4)

The Community Room will have an AV system for presentations using a new projection system.
A new Epson projector will be ceiling mounted. This projector is WUXGA in resolution and
produces 5200 ANSI Lumens. The projected image will be displayed on a wall mounted
manual screen that measures 60x96 ceiling recessed electric screen.
In a new lectern, there will be inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer, and Cable
TV receiver. All inputs will feed a switcher. The output of the switcher will feed the projector. An
adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting
connectors to HDMI.
There will be wireless lapel and handheld microphones for use in the room. All audio will feed
a mixer/amplifier driving four ceiling speakers, and the Assistive Listening System is included
with four receivers. The wireless mics will not be used for conferencing, only voice
amplification in the room.
Audio from the projector will feed a pair of self-amplified wall mounted speakers on either side
of the projection screen.
All equipment will be housed in the lectern. The lectern will have an umbilical to the wall with
disconnects.
An Extron Media Link Controller, button panel controller, will be installed on the lectern for
control of the system. It will control projector on/off, input selection, and volume. The Cable
TV receivers remote will be used for control of the receiver.
The owner is responsible for an electrical outlet at the projector, monitors, and lectern
locations, and power to the left end of the screen. A cable pathway from the wall to the
projector will be provided by the owner. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and
receiver.
E 72338 Break Room 206

A 50 TV will be wall mounted in the break room for viewing Cable TV. The Cable TV remote
and the TV remote will be used for control. Audio will be heard from the TVs speakers.
The owner is responsible for an electrical outlet at the TVs location. The owner will also supply
the Cable TV feed and receiver.
F 72346 Training Room (revision 4)

The Training Room will have an AV system for presentations. It will use a projection system
removed for the existing Council Chambers. The owner furnished Panasonic projector will be
ceiling mounted. The projected image will be displayed on an owner provided Draper ceiling
recessed electric screen. The projector and screen will be removed from the current Council
Chambers and will be reinstalled in this room.
In a lectern, there will be inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer, and Cable TV
receiver. All inputs will feed a switcher. The output of the switcher will feed the projector. An
adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting
connectors to HDMI.
The audio output of the projector will feed a pair of wall mounted self-amplified
speakers. switcher will feed and amplifier that will drive six ceiling speakers.
All equipment will be housed in the lectern. The lectern will have an umbilical to the wall with
disconnects.
An Extron Media Link Controller, button panel controller, will be installed in the front wall for
control of the system. It will control projector on/off, input selection, and volume. The Cable
TV receivers remote will be used for control of the receiver.
The owner is responsible for a quad electrical outlet at the projector and lectern locations, and
power to the left end of the screen. A cable pathway from the wall to the projector will be
provided by the owner. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver.
G 83371 Conference Room 203 (Revision 4)
There will be a 65 LED monitor on the front wall of the room.
Inputs for a dedicated computer at the table and Cable TV will be available. At the table a
Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power outlets, and connections for
HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers will cut the table for the Cable
Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video signal extension to the monitor.
Cables will run through an owner provided floor box. A disconnect in the floor box is planned.
The monitors remote will be used for control of the monitor.
The owner is responsible for a quad electrical outlet at the monitor location. The owner will
provide the cable pathway from the table to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable
TV feed and receiver.
No in wall box or adapter ring is included in this revision.
This room will have the same AV system and rooms 111 and 148 installed for presentations.
Web conferencing capabilities can be added but are not included in this proposal.
There will be a 70 LED monitor on the front wall of the rooms. An in-wall box will be provided
for installation by the owner at the monitor locations. This box will house system equipment.
Inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer at the table, and Cable TV will be
available. It is assumed the dedicated computer is a small form factor computer mounted
behind the monitor.
At the table a Cable Cubby will be installed with two AC outlets, two USB power outlets, and
connections for HDMI and USB (for a future table microphone). Tierney Brothers will cut the
table for the Cable Cubby. A transmitter will be mounted under the table for video signal
extension to the monitor. Cables will run through an owner provided floor box. A disconnect
in the floor box is planned.
An adapter ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple
Lighting connectors to HDMI.

An Extron Media Link Controller, button panel controller, will be installed on the wall for control
of the system. It will control monitor on/off, input selection, and volume. The Cable TV
receivers remote will be used for control of the receiver.
The owner is responsible for the installation of the in-wall box at the monitor location with two
duplex electrical outlets in the box. The owner will provide the cable pathway from the table
to the monitor. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver.
H 79520 Fire Place TV R2

A 50 TV will be wall mounted Above the Fire Place in the Lobby for viewing Cable TV. The
Cable TV remote and the TV remote will be used for control. Audio will be heard from the TVs
speakers. A thin mount will be used to meet ADA depth guidelines. Location of the Cable Box
is to be determined as it will not fit behind the TV. An in-wall box can be added behind the TV
to house the Cable receiver and signage player. This can be discussed and added as a
Change Order if needed.
The owner is responsible for an electrical outlet at the TVs location. The owner will also supply
the Cable TV feed and receiver. No computer feed to this monitor is being provided. The
cable signal will be the only source to this display.
I 72390 Existing Training room in Police Station (new in REV 2)

The existing Training Room in the Police Station will be used for meetings, plan reviews and
web based conferencing.
A new Epson projector will be ceiling mounted. This projector is WUXGA in resolution and
produces 5200 ANSI Lumens. The projected image will be displayed on the existing ceiling
recessed electric screen. Two 58 monitors will be mounted on either of side of the projection
screen using swing arm mounts. A new projector is included as the existing projector is only
XGA in resolution.
In the new lectern, there will be inputs for a dedicated computer, laptop computer, and
Cable TV receiver. All inputs will feed a Crestron Digital Media Presentation Switcher (DMPS)
with internal control processor. The outputs will feed the projector and monitors. This is a
matrixing switching allowing multiple images to be displayed at the same time. An adapter
ring will be provided with adapters for Display Port, Apple 30 pin, and Apple Lighting
connectors to HDMI.
The existing Eye10 ceiling camera in the current Council Chambers will be relocated to this
room at a location in the room to be determined. This will also feed the switcher.
There will be wireless lapel and handheld microphones for use in the room. All audio will feed
the DMPS whose outputs feed the existing amplifier, driving the existing four ceiling speakers.
An Assistive Listening System is included with four receivers.
All equipment will be housed in the lectern. The lectern will have an umbilical to the wall. The
Umbilical will NOT disconnect at the wall.
A fixed USB camera will be mounted above one monitor and will feed the dedicated
computer. A Chat 170 USB mic/speaker for voice pickup will be available at the lectern to the
dedicated computer. This microphone will not cover the entire room. This is intended for
smaller room use. If the entire room coverage is needed, it can be added as a revision or a
change order. The USB camera and the microphone will be used for Web based
conferencing. All conferencing control will be through the dedicated computer and the web
conferencing application.
The wireless microphones will not be used during a conference session.
The Crestron control system will have a wireless 8.7 touch panel as the control point. This will
reside on the lectern. The Crestron will control the projector on/off, screen up/down, individual
monitor on/off, or all one, input selection and routing, document camera zoom and focus
control, cable TV channel selection, and room volume.
The owner is responsible for an electrical outlet at the projector, monitors, and lectern
locations I f not already in place. The owner will also supply the Cable TV feed and receiver.
The existing Sharp monitor at the back of the room will remain as is. It will not tie into the new
system. It will be a standalone device within the space.
J 80156 Cart for Sharp monitor (new in REV 2)

The existing Sharp Interactive wall mounted monitor will be taken off the wall and installed on
a cart making it mobile. An HDMI cable is included for a laptop connection.
The Tierney Brothers building warranty plan will be provided in a separate proposal. A 90 day
installation warranty is included in this proposal for each room.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal. If you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact us at your convenience at 612-331-5500. Our fax number is 612-331-
3424.
Proposal Prepared By:

Sales Representative - Heidi Harvey
Sales Engineer - Richard Long
Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Scope of Integration Services presented here. ___________
Quote
Serving the States of: IL | IN | IA | KY | MI | MN | OH | WI

Remit To: 3300 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414-3326
(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
www.tierneybrothers.com Page 1 of 3 Quote # Date
83360 10/4/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Accounts Payable 129 Holmes Street South
City of Shakopee Shakopee MN 55379
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee MN 55379
___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly ___ Initial if correct or revise accordingly
Expires Sales Rep Contract Memo

1/2/2017 209 Heidi Harvey MNS-CPV 21594 A - New Council Chambers (SC)
Qty Item Description Price Ext. Price
A - New Council Chambers (SC)

Revised
Owner Furnished Product - the majority of the equipment for the new
Council chambers to be removed from existing Council Chambers
and re-installed in new room, Including:
Crestron DM Matrix Switcher, Transmitters and receivers
Dais monitors and signal distribution,
microphones, audio mixers, amps and associated equipment
Broadcast system including cameras, switcher etc.
Digital Signage System to be moved to new IT location in PD.
2 E905 E905 - 90 LED LCD Public Display Monitor, 1920 x 1080 (FHD), 350 7,076.00 14,152.00
cd/m2 panel, Full bidirectional LAN/RS-232 Control, HDMI x2,
DisplayPort, DVI-D, VGA, OPS Option Slot, Integrated 10W x 2
speakers,
3 year standard warranty, Stand not included.
1 E585 E585 - 58 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC tuner, 1,357.20 1,357.20
1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, RS-232 control, Full AV function,
USB Player, Built in speakers, 3 Year Warranty
1 E505 E505- 50 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC tuner, 701.80 701.80
1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, RS-232 control, Full AV function,
USB Player, Built in speakers, 3 Year Warranty
1 Chief Mounting Custom Package - Mounting Solution for four displays: 1,642.03 1,642.03
System (Custom Three swing arm mounts and One tilt mount
Design)
3 DM-TX-4K-100-C-1 Wall Plate 4K DigitalMedia 8G+ Transmitter, Black Textured 402.50 1,207.50
G-B-T (Decorator faceplate not included)
2 DM-RMC-SCALER- Crestron Digital Media 8G copper Receiver & Controller 805.00 1,610.00
C
1 DM-RMC-4K-100-C Wall Plate 4K DigitalMedia 8G+ Receiver & Room Controller 100, 402.50 402.50
-1G-B-T Black Textured
1 DM-TX-4K-302-C 4K DigitalMedia 8G+ Transmitter 302 1,150.00 1,150.00
2 DMC-4K-C-HDCP2 HDBaseT Certified 4K DigitalMedia 8G+ Input Card for DM 747.50 1,495.00
Switchers
1 DMC-4K-HD-HDCP 4K HDMI Input Card for DM Switchers 460.00 460.00

2
2 EYE-14 Ceiling Visualizer 3,872.96 7,745.92

Quote
Page 2 of 3 Quote # Date

83360 10/4/2016
2 EYE-Kit Ceiling mount for suspended ceiling or sheetrock 218.40 436.80
1 Interface System Custom Package - Floor box connections 117.84 117.84

Grommet plates
---------------------Audio Equipment---------------------
1 Custom Product FSR floor box and connections for 16 microphones 256.00 256.00
Bundle
1 Speaker System Custom Package - five speakers for dais, two pendent speakers for 635.84 635.84
audience area, two wall speakers for lobby
1 Integration Item LS-95-01 1,707.11 1,707.11

Listen Technology Assistive Listening System
with:
One (1) LT-84-01 ListenIR Transmitter/Radiator Combo
Four (4) LT-5200-IR Advanced Intelligent DSP IR Receiver
Four (4) LA-430 Intelligent Ear Phone/Neck Loop Lanyard
Four (4) LA-401 Universal Ear Speaker
One (1) LA-422 USB to Micro USB Cable
One (1) LA-381-01 Intelligent 12-Unit Charging Tray
One (1) LA-382 Intelligent Cable Management Unit
One (1) LA-901 Listen Disinfecting Wipes (Cylinder 75 Count)
One (1) LA-904 Listen Dispensing Log Book
---------------------Control System---------------------
1 Control Panel and Custom Package - Two Crestron touch panels - 4,082.50 4,082.50
Accessories one wired 10 and one wireless 8.7 with table top kit and PoE
Injector and RF Gateway
---------------------Other Equipment and Services---------------------
1 Cables, Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware Including: 3,761.53 3,761.53
Connectors and Universal HDMI Adapter Ring, Multiple lengths of HDMI, Plenum
Hardware Digital Media Cabling, Bulk Cabling and Misc Hardware
1 Services: Design - Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering 5,096.00 5,096.00
State Contract and Project Management Services 79.63 Hours at $64.00/Hour
1 Services - State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union, 7,380.00 7,380.00
Integration for MN Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union and/or
State Contract Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order to the
client. 105.43 Hours at $70.00/Hour
1 Programming and Programming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House 8,690.00 8,690.00
Configuration 75.57 Hours at $115.00/Hour
Includes 90-day Programming Warranty; allowing for modifications to
be made to the initial functionality within this time frame at no charge.
Appointment times determined by Tierney Brothers. Changes
requested after this time will be billable at standard hourly rates.
If tax has not been included on this proposal, pricing does not
include Minnesota General Sales Tax under Minnesota Statues
Chapter 297A Section 70 Exemptions for Governments and
Nonprofit Groups. Please inform us if this project will be used for
taxable purposes.
If tax has been included on this proposal, we do not have a tax

exempt form on file for your account. Please provide a completed
Form ST3, Certificate of Exemption if applicable.
Quote

83360 10/4/2016
* This quotation is for product and services included on the

Minnesota State Contract only.
* Additional components not available on Contract may be needed for
the system to function as designed.
* Installation and non contract items provided on separate quotation.
The services on this page must be purchased in conjunction with the
Integration services on the Contract Release portion of this proposal.
* Cabling is a combination of pre-terminated product and bulk cable
requiring termination with a specific compression tool.
* Manufacturers warranties only apply to product purchased on State
Contract portion of this proposal.
* Tierney Brothers, Inc. will assist in any vendor communications to
obtain replacements or return product as specified in the Contract.
To accept this quotation, complete the proposal summary page at the end of this document. Please review the terms,
conditions and client responsibilities of this proposal in full.
_____________________________
Please inspect product upon delivery. All claims for defective merchandise or errors in shipping must be made within five
days after receipt of goods. Clients using their own carriers will be responsible for filing their own freight claims if product is
damaged in transit. Returns require an authorization number and must be made within 30 days. Custom orders and
Consumables, such as projector lamps, may not be returned. Returns are subject to restocking fees with the exception of
out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a
minimum charge of 25%.
_____________________________
The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $64,087.57
organization without written consent of Tierney Brothers, Inc.
This document is subject to the terms and conditions found here: www.tierneybrothers.com/SOTC
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
72413 8/18/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

11/16/2016 209 Heidi Harvey Transaction Not Eligible A - New Council Chambers (NC)
A - New Council Chambers (NC)
Non-Contract Services - This sale is consistent with the Contract

Release Construction Language Modification associated with the
MN State Contract.
1 Integration Item 340-12 95.00 95.00

Sandies12 V DC LED ON AIR Studio Warning Light
1 Integration Item 65-356 20.54 20.54

Sandies 12VDC Power Supply for Model 340/343
1 Integration Item Hi5 400.00 400.00

Aja HD-SDI to HDMI converter
1 FL-500P-4-B Floor Box - 4 Deep 158.00 158.00
1 Integration Item FL-500P-BLP-C U-ACCESS 485.00 485.00

FSR floor box cover
5 Integration Item D-PSP1A 175.00 875.00

RDL Decora-Style Active Loudspeaker - Format-A
white
5 Integration Item DC-1W 51.00 255.00

RDL 1 gang mounting box for speaker
White
1 Integration Item TX-TPS1A 123.00 123.00

RDL Active Single-Pair Sender - Twisted Pair Format-A - Balanced
line input
1 Integration Item RU-TPDA 226.00 226.00

RDL Active Distributor - Twisted Pair Format-A - RDL Format-A input
to Four outputs
2 PS24AS Radio Design Labs PS-24AS 22.00 44.00

24 VDC 500mA Switching Power Supply
1 Services - State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union, 3,525.00 3,525.00
Integration for MN Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Non Contract
State Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a Contract Vendor
(Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business Hours). Union
and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a change order
to the client. 49 Hours at $75.00/Hour
Quote

72413 8/18/2016
_____________________________
out of box failures and replacements under warranty. Restocking fees varying depending on the product line, expect a Subtotal 6,206.54
minimum charge of 25%. Shipping Cost (UPS Ground) 121.45
_____________________________ Total $6,327.99
The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
72312 4/19/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

12/30/2016 209 Heidi Harvey MNS-CPV 21594 B - Executive Conf. 111 (SC)
B - Executive Conf. 111

revision 4
---------------------Video Equipment---------------------
1 E655 65 LED LCD Public Display Monitor w/built in ATSC/NTSC tuner, 2,062.48 2,062.48
1920x1080 (FHD) native resolution, limited RS-232 control, HDMI x3,
VGA, RCA Component/Composite, USB Media Player, Built in
speakers, Tabletop stand not included, 3 Year Warranty
1 Chief Mounting Custom Package - Mounting Solution for 65 Display Including: Fixed 230.08 230.08
System (Custom Wall Mount
Design)
1 Custom Product Extron Cable Cubby 1200 with connections for HDMI, USB, Network, 546.25 546.25
Bundle USB Power, and AC
1 Interface System Custom Package - HDMI extension System Including: transmitter, 588.89 588.89
receiver, misc hardware
Owner Furnished Product - Small Form computer and CATV receiver

both with HDMI outputs
---------------------Control System---------------------
1 MLC Plus 100 MediaLink Plus Controller - MLC Plus 100White and Black 684.25 684.25
White and Black Faceplates, 2-Gang
Faceplates, 2-Gang
1 DL85K Dl85K Lcd/Cfl Proof Dinkylink Ir Rcvr, Kit - Xantech 122.80 122.80
1 Cables, Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware Including: 543.52 543.52
Connectors and Custom Adapter Ring, HDMI, Shielded Twisted Pair Cabling, Bulk
Hardware Cabling and Misc Hardware
1 Services: Design - Services: Design - State Contract (Non Construction) Engineering 552.00 552.00
1 Services - State Contract (Non Construction) Installation Services (Non-Union, 612.00 612.00
Quote

72312 4/19/2016
1 Programming and Programming and Configuration Completed in the Field or In House 115.00 115.00
Configuration 1 Hours at $115.00/Hour
taxable purposes.


_____________________________
_____________________________
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
www.tierneybrothers.com Quote # Date
72418 8/26/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

11/24/2016 209 Heidi Harvey Transaction Not Eligible B - Executive Conf. 111 (NC)

MN State Contract.
1 Services - Non Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a 650.00 650.00

Integration for MN Contract Vendor (Non-Union, Non Prevailing Wage; Normal Business
State Contract Hours). Union and/or Prevailing Wage rate requirement will result in a
change order to the client. 6 Hours at $75.00/Hour and $267
Subcontractor installation
_____________________________
_____________________________
The information contained within this proposal is supplied to you on a confidential basis and is not for disclosure to any Total $650.00
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
72416 4/20/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

12/30/2016 209 Heidi Harvey MNS-CPV 21594 C - Conference room 148 (SC)
C - Conference room 148

revision 4
---------------------Video Equipment---------------------
Design)


client. 4 Hours at $70.00/Hour
Configuration 1 Hour at $115.00/Hour
Quote

72416 4/20/2016
taxable purposes.


_____________________________
_____________________________
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
72316 10/4/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

1/2/2017 209 Heidi Harvey Transaction Not Eligible C - Conference room 148 (NC)
C - Conference room 148 (NC)

MN State Contract.

_____________________________
_____________________________
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
83368 10/4/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

1/2/2017 209 Heidi Harvey MNS-CPV 21594 D - Community Room 108 (SC)
D - Community Room 108 (SC)

revision 4
---------------------Video Equipment---------------------
1 PowerLite Pro PowerLite Pro G6570WU Projector, WUXGA, 5200 Lumens, 3,232.90 3,232.90
G6570WU w/standard lens, w/ HD BaseT
1 36442 MODEL C,113DIAG 60X96NPA HCMW 296.70 296.70
1 Chief Mounting Custom Package - Mounting Solution for Projector Including: 345.18 345.18
System (Custom Projector mount, fixed pipe, ceiling plate, plenum ceiling box
Design)
1 Interface System Custom Package - HDMI switching / extension System Includes Four 1,588.00 1,588.00
Input Scaler, HDMI Twisted Pair Receiver Input Plate

---------------------Audio Equipment---------------------
1 C2PS C2PS Control 2P Stereo Speaker Pair JBL -Black 184.00 184.00
2 SPK811 Universal Single Speaker Mount Black 17.97 35.94
---------------------Control System---------------------
Faceplates, 2-Gang
1 70-1097-02 SMB 110 Series 115.00 115.00

Surface Mount Boxes for US-Gang Products
Two-gang, black
---------------A/V Furniture and Rack(s)---------------
1 LEX31-EBT Executive Lectern 1,176.91 1,176.91

Features: pullout keyboard tray, pocket door, fan, 14U rack frame,
Locking front & rear doors, removable electronics pod, Thermowrap
finish and casters for mobility.
FINISH BLACK
1 Equipment Rack Custom Package of Equipment Rack Accessories (5-10 Space) 284.52 284.52
Accessories Includes: Power Distribution, Three Space Trap, Rack Shelf, Vent
Package 1 (5-10 Panel, Misc Hardware, Rack Shelf
Quote

83368 10/4/2016
Space)
Connectors and Universal HDMI Adapter Ring, HDMI, VGA with Audio, Shielded
Hardware Twisted Pair Cabling, Bulk Cabling and Misc Hardware
taxable purposes.


_____________________________
_____________________________
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
72428 8/18/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

11/16/2016 209 Heidi Harvey Transaction Not Eligible D - Community Room 108 (NC)
D - Community Room 108

MN State Contract.
2 03137 1FT 18 AWG OUTLET SAVER POWER EXTENSION CORD (NEMA 3.00 6.00
5-15P TO NEMA 5-15R)

change order to the client. 8 Hours at $75.00/Hour.
_____________________________
_____________________________
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
72346 4/19/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

12/30/2016 209 Heidi Harvey MNS-CPV 21594
F - Training Room 220 - State Contract

revision 4
---------------------Video Equipment---------------------
Owner Furnished Product - Panasonic DW530, mount, and Draper

Screen from current Council Chambers
1 IN1604 DTP Four Input Scaler with DTP Output 1,259.25 1,259.25
1 DTP HDMI 230 Rx HDMI Twisted Pair Extender - Rx 270.25 270.25
1 Interface System Custom Package - lectern wall plate 87.00 87.00
---------------------Audio Equipment---------------------
1 C2PS C2PS Control 2P Stereo Speaker Pair JBL -Black 184.00 184.00
4 SPK811 Universal Single Speaker Mount Black 17.97 71.88
---------------------Control System---------------------
Faceplates, 2-Gang
---------------A/V Furniture and Rack(s)---------------
1 LEX31-EBT Executive Lectern 1,176.91 1,176.91

Features: pullout keyboard tray, pocket door, fan, 14U rack frame,
Locking front & rear doors, removable electronics pod, Thermowrap
finish and casters for mobility.
FINISH BLACK
1 Equipment Rack Custom Package of Equipment Rack Accessories (5-10 Space) 245.27 245.27
Accessories
Package 1 (5-10
Space)
1 Cables, Custom Package of Cables, Connectors and Hardware 602.18 602.18

Connectors and
Hardware
Quote

72346 4/19/2016
taxable purposes.


_____________________________
_____________________________ Total $6,465.99
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
72429 10/4/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

1/2/2017 209 Heidi Harvey Transaction Not Eligible
F - Training Room 220 - Non Contract

MN State Contract.
1 Integration Item NC5FXX 6.48 6.48

Neutrix 5 pin XLR Female
1 Services - Non Contract Installation Services - Construction Services by a 1,912.00 1,912.00

change order to the client. 9 Hours at $75.00/Hour and $1387 in
Subcontractor labor
_____________________________
_____________________________ Total $1,928.48
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
83371 10/4/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

1/2/2017 209 Heidi Harvey MNS-CPV 21594 G - Conference room 203 (SC) R4
G - Conference room 203 (SC)

revision 4
---------------------Video Equipment---------------------
Design)


Quote

83371 10/4/2016
taxable purposes.


_____________________________
_____________________________
Quote

(612) 331-5500 | (800) 933-7337 | Fax (612) 331-3424
83370 10/4/2016
Ship To
Bill To
City of Shakopee
Shakopee MN 55379

1/2/2017 209 Heidi Harvey Transaction Not Eligible G - Conference room 203 (NC) R4
G - Conference room 203 (NC)
Revision 4

MN State Contract.

_____________________________
_____________________________
612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax - 612.331.3424
Responsibilities and Conditions

Client Responsibilities Tierney Brothers Responsibilities (Upon Authorization)
Contract a licensed electrician to provide high voltage power Proceed with ordering the specified equipment and preparing a
connections. The system design will determine if optimum schedule for completion of the proposed services.
placement of outlets is best achieved before or after the installation
of the AV equipment. The assigned Project Manager will Conduct pre-installation site visit (if necessary) involving the main site
communicate the specific to you during the project planning. contact, site facilities representatives and a Tierney Brothers' project
Tierney Brothers recommends that each projector, TV, plasma, LCD, manager or a qualified alternate.
etc. have a dedicated quad electrical outlet.
Review scope, terms and conditions of the installation with the client
Provide Tierney Brothers with any existing system design at the pre-installation site visit. This will include, but is not limited to
specifications, diagrams, room drawings or other materials that electrical, construction and cosmetic responsibilities.
would facilitate completion of the proposed Scope of Integration
Services. Basic system training, separate from Professional Development, is
included in this proposal. This training will be scheduled and
All necessary ceiling tile work involved in the installation, unless an completed by a Tierney Brothers' representative at the end of the
alternative has been indicated in the Scope of Integration Services project installation.
in this proposal.
If Professional Development is part of this proposal, sessions must be
Prepare, replace, repair or modify any structural or cosmetic scheduled within six months of install completion.
changes that Tierney Brothers has made or needs to make. This
includes, but is not limited to, ceiling grids, floor tiles, walls and pre- Clients purchasing SMARTboards: After the installation of the
existing equipment. This does not include repair for accidental SMARTboard is complete, the SMARTboard USB connection will be
damage caused by Tierney Brothers. tested using the Tierney Brothers installer's laptop. After system
functionality is confirmed, the USB connection will be hooked into
Confirm area is ready for installation when scheduled. This includes the client's computer if it is present in the space.
but is not limited to the room being vacated, physical conditions
confirmed and owner furnished equipment (OFE) available. If the For safety reasons, Tierney Brothers will not modify/cut the trays on
area is not prepared for installation when scheduled or the client existing white boards or chalk boards. A solution for mounting over
has not notified Tierney Brothers five business days in advance of any the existing board will be proposed. Any modifications to the
schedule change or installation cancellation, there will be a $350.00 existing board would need to be made by the customer prior to the
charge. Rescheduling of the installation will be set for a later date arrival for Tierney Brothers installation personnel.
as determined by Tierney Brothers.
Scheduling
TBI will not be responsible for the condition and functionality of any Installations are typically scheduled six to eight weeks from receipt
existing OFE during the installation process. This includes de-install of the customers purchase order. Custom ordered product may
and reinstall of OFE. Should existing equipment fail or not work increase the time needed to complete the proposed services.
properly with our system design, the customer will have the option of
sourcing a TBI approved replacement part or TBI will offer a billable Standard service and support is limited to Monday through Friday,
replacement alternative. If OFE malfunction causes delays in the 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM central standard time, excluding national
installation timeframe, additional billable labor charges may apply. holidays. Expanded service hours may be available for an
additional charge if determined necessary.
Clients purchasing SMART product are responsible for loading all
SMART software on the applicable computers and connection of This schedule assumes no delays or obstacles will be encountered in
these computers to the SMARTboard prior to any scheduled training gaining access for the installation.
sessions.
Site Conditions
Complete Customer Configuration Worksheets as requested by Tierney Brothers cannot enter into work in or otherwise disturb any
Tierney Brothers within five business days. This information is required areas containing asbestos.
to properly integrate the new equipment with your existing IT
infrastructure. Tierney Brothers recommends that each Projector, TV, Plasma, LCD,
etc. have a duplex receptacle fed off of a dedicated 20 amp
TBI requires access to customers computer and network at the time circuit available for use. Systems containing multiple racks of
of installation to be able to complete installation and testing of the amplifiers or other equipment may require additional circuits.
designed system. Return visits to test equipment and functionality
may result in additional charges.
TBIs initial estimates assume all work may be completed using

standard ladders. If a lift is required, additional charges will be
incurred and presented as part of a change request.
For U of M Installations only: University of Minnesota customers are

responsible for contacting their Facilities Management Department
to coordinate conduit installation for all A/V wire and cable
installations.
Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Responsibilities and Conditions presented here. ___________
612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax - 612.331.3424
Proposal Terms
Accounting Terms Other Terms
For installations scheduled to take 30 days or less from the first day Installation Warranty
on site to the last, Tierney Brothers will invoice the total project in full See specific warranty coverage program outlined in this proposal.
upon substantial completion. Tierney Brothers reserves the right to
bill progressively for installations which are scheduled to take more Repair or replacement service for TBI installed consumer grade
than 30 days on site. The balance is due Net 30 days from the monitors/displays are subject to manufacturer warranty and
installation completion date, with 2% interest added to unpaid service. TBI does offer de-install/re-install assistance for vendor
balance. warranty repair or replacement at an additional charge.
Sales Taxes Programming Warranty

All applicable sales tax amounts will be charged on the sale of The programming warranty is 90 days, starting at the commission of
goods or services according to each governing law and remitted to the system. Changes or fixes to the system after this time will be
the proper taxing authority. If your organization is tax exempt, billable at our standard service call rates."
please complete an exemption certificate and return to Tierney
Brothers. Labor Classifications and Assumptions
Unless mutually agreed upon in writing prior to executing this
Proposal Changes agreement, it is the understanding of both parties that Union and/or
If additional products or services are requested prior to receipt of Prevailing Wage regulations, specifically those contained in 40
your signed purchase order or quote proposal, Tierney Brothers will U.S.C. 276a-5, or MN Stat 177.41-177.44, do not apply to the work
provide an updated quote proposal, including a revised scope. If to be performed under this contract.
additional products or services are requested after receipt of your
signed purchase order or quote proposal, Tierney Brothers will Unless travel charges are specified, this proposal assumes Tierney
provide a change request quote with the requested equipment Brothers, Inc. has local certified, licensed and insured technicians
and scope to detail the requested changes for your approval. available to complete the integration services. In the event, the job
site is located in a geographical area where this does not apply or
Upon receipt of your signed purchase order or quote proposal, a specific installation time is requested for which this personnel is
Tierney Brothers will proceed with the authorized services and not available, additional charges may apply.
invoice in accordance with the purchase order or quote proposal.
Verbal agreements will not be processed until confirmation, in All hours for installation are assumed to be between 8am and 5pm
writing, has been received. (normal business hours) unless specified in this proposal. Request for
work outside of normal business hours will be subject to the following
There may be a 20% to 30% restocking fee plus freight charges for increased hourly labor rates:
those items ordered which have to be returned to the manufacturer
due to customer request or by change of order. Custom order - Second Shift (3:00pm to 10:00pm) will be billed at one and a
products and certain product lines not typically carried by Tierney half times our standard labor rate.
Brothers may not be returned. - Weekend or Holiday hours will be billed at two times our
standard labor rate.
Requests for installations outside our normal business hours are

subject to approval by the Director of Post Sales Integration.
NOTICE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION - The information in this proposal is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the
named parties. If the reader of this proposal is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of the information contained in this document is strictly prohibited. If this has been
received in error, please notify the responsible party immediately and then delete this proposal from all data storage devices and destroy all hard
copies.
Video recording of a Tierney Brothers SMART Certified Trainer or Professional Development session, and copying or distribution of any printed
material supplied by Tierney Brothers Inc., is protected content under copyright licensing and can be used only with express permission from
Tierney Brothers, Inc. Any video or digital content created during a training session can be used only within the organization paying for such
services and cannot be shared online or distributed in any manner.
This quotation is valid for a period of 90 days.

Please initial to acknowledge and authorize the Proposal Terms presented here. ___________
612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax - 612.331.3424
Tierney Brothers 90 Day Limited Warranty Coverage Program

Designed for:
City of Shakopee
Terms and Conditions
Tierney Brothers, Inc. warrants the installation you have purchased from Tierney Brothers, Inc. from defects in materials and workmanship, under
normal use, during the 90 Day Warranty period. Normal use is defined as operating the system within its designed specifications. The warranty
period commences on the date of customer signoff, at the completion of the install by Tierney Brothers, Inc.
During the warranty period, Tierney Brothers, Inc. will first work to resolve any problems by troubleshooting over the phone. If Tierney Brothers,
Inc. Support Specialists determine that the issue cannot be resolved over the phone, a Technician will be dispatched to your location(s) within
72 hours of the original call (Monday through Friday 8:00am 5:00pm, excluding national holidays). Customers outside of a 150 mile radius of
Tierney Brothers, Inc. are subject to mileage and trip charges. If service is required after the 90 Day Warranty period has expired, the customer
will be billed at Tierney Brothers, Inc. current labor rates. If the customer has purchased a Tierney Brothers, Inc. Extended Maintenance
Agreement, that will commence at the end of the 90 Day Warranty. If you would like additional information regarding Tierney Brothers, Inc.
Extended Maintenance Agreements, please contact your Tierney Brothers, Inc. Sales Representative at 612-331-5500.
Obtaining Warranty Service
To obtain warranty service, please use your custom support portal (support.tierneybrothers.com) and contact us via chat, phone, or email:
https://support.tierneybrothers.com/
Click here for a short video explaining how to log in to your support portal your first time:
http://content.jwplatform.com/players/TpGSX21s-kaM9q1Ga.html
If you have any questions, please email support@tierneybrothers.com or call us at 800-933-7337. You can also call our advanced support line,
855-612-7762.
Limitations of coverage
The following items are excluded from coverage under the warranty:
a. Equipment that has been removed or reinstalled in a different location

b. Damage or other equipment failure due to causes beyond our control including, but not limited to, operator negligence, the failure to
maintain the equipment according to the owners manual instructions, abuse, vandalism, theft, fire, flood, wind, freezing, power failure,
inadequate power supply, acts of war or acts of God.
c. Any utilization of equipment that is inconsistent with either the design of the equipment or the way the manufacturer intended the
equipment to be used.
d. 90 Day Onsite Warranty covers all hardware related failures, network or software related failures are not covered under Tierney Brothers, Inc.
90 Day Onsite Warranty.
e. Operational or mechanical failure which is not reported prior to expiration of this contract.
f. Equipment where the serial plate attached to the equipment is removed, defaced or made illegible.
g. Damage resulting from unauthorized repair, software virus, improper electrical wiring and connections.
h. Existing Owner Furnished equipment.
i. Lift and Scaffolding rental is not included.
This maintenance contract refers to:

City Hall
11466 R4
I have read, understand and agree to the above terms and conditions per the plan elected.
Authorized Signature:
Date:
Plan Type:
612.331.5500800.933.7337Fax - 612.331.3424
City of Shakopee
City Hall
11466 R4
Proposal Summary
Please Initial to Accept or Decline

Please Acknowledge All Proposals
Accept Decline
A - New Council Chambers

State Contract Total: $ 64,087.57
Non Contract Total: $ 6,327.99
Proposal Total: $ 70,415.56
Non Contract Total: $ 650.00
C - Conference Room 148
D - Community Room 108
F - Training Room 220
Non Contract Total: $ 1,928.48
G - Conference Room 203 R1
Project Total: $ 107,377.29 *Project total if all proposals are accepted.
The undersigned authorizes Tierney Brothers to proceed in accordance with the proposal including options elected and agrees
as a representative of the client to be responsible for payment.
By signing below, the client has read and understands the scope of services and agrees to the client responsibilities and
conditions.
Client's Name:
Authorized Signature:
*Client's Email Address:
*Client's Email Address:
Date:
*Please note, one or more items on your quote may include software. Our vendors require two unique email addresses with different
domain names to be submitted with software orders. These email addresses will receive the electronic key codes required to download
and install your new software. Please include these two email addresses with your purchase order at the time your order is placed.

Agenda 2017 2 7 Meeting

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Agenda 2017 2 7 Meeting

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Shakopee City Council

Shakopee Mission Statement

Shakopee City Council

CEAM Award Nomination

Deadline is November 29, 2016

APPLICATIONS MUST BE FOR MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT

1. Name of Project: SANITARYSEWERLATERALPIPEREHABILITATIONPROGRAM

2. Name and Address of the following:

b) Prime Contractor: National WaterMainCleaningCompany (NWMCC)

c) Design Engineer: ShortElliottHendrickson,Inc.

Deadline is November 29, 2016

5. Public benefit and service nature of project.

6. Design characteristics and features or innovations.

Deadline is November 29, 2016

7. Construction management scheduling and control techniques used.

Deadline is November 29, 2016

Deadline is November 29, 2016

12. Construction innovations.

Deadline is November 29, 2016

13. Construction quality.

14. Nominated by (Deadline is November 29, 2016)

Printed Name: Jennifer Schumann Date: 11/28/16

Address: 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302

15. Name of public agency administering the contract:

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director

WSB & Associates, Inc. Amendment to Consultant Contract

1. Section III.C of the Contract is amended to read:

C. Period. This agreement shall be effective until December 31, 2017,

2. Except as otherwise modified in this Agreement, all other provisions in the

CONSULTANT CITY OF SHAKOPEE

WSB & Associates, Inc. By_________________________________

1. Section III.C of the Contract is amended to read:

C. Period. This agreement shall be effective until December 31, 2017,

2. Except as otherwise modified in this Agreement, all other provisions in the

CONSULTANT CITY OF SHAKOPEE

Bolton & Menk, Inc. By_________________________________

1. Section III.C of the Contract is amended to read:

C. Period. This agreement shall be effective until December 31, 2017,

2. Except as otherwise modified in this Agreement, all other provisions in the

CONSULTANT CITY OF SHAKOPEE

SEH, Inc. By_________________________________

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director

SEH, Inc. Manhole Replacement Memo

TO: Bruce Loney, PE

FROM: Jennifer Schumann

DATE: January 4, 2017

RE: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Evaluation - Preliminary Engineering Report

Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists

Table 1 Manhole Evaluation Results

Alternatives for Rehabilitation

Three-Layer Polyuria System

Geopolymer with Epoxy Lining System

Table 2 Summary of Rehabilitation Alternatives

Polyurethane Coating $430 Yes 6-8 hours No No

Three-Layer Polyuria $360 Yes 6-8 hours Yes No

Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation

0 250 500 Feet

City Sanitary Sewer

Interceptor (Gravity main)

Sanitary Sewer Manhole Inspection and Evaluation

0 250 500 Feet