Anda di halaman 1dari 58

FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED

2009

Page
1

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
2

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
3

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

COURSE: - INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS FINANCE

SECTION: B

COMPANY: FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED

REPORT ON: FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS

Page
4
SUBMMITTED TO: - ASIF
SAEED NAJI

SUBMMITTED BY: NAVEED SHERAZ

STUDENT ID: SP09-MM-0054

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

SUBMMTION DATE: - 10TH


NOVEMBER, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
5

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

DESCRIPTION PAGE
NUMBER
01 Letter of acknowledgement 5

02 Company profile 6

03 Calculation of ratios 8

04 Cross sectional analysis table 12

05 Graphical presentation on cross 18


sectional analysis

06 Time series analysis 28

07 Graphical presentation on time series 39


analysis

08 Common size balance sheet 50

09 Common size income statement 54

Page
10 Internal growth rate 55
6
11 Sustainable growth rate 56

12 Pro forma balance sheet 57

13 Pro forma income statement 60

14 Plug variable 61

15 Recommendations 62

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

LETTER OF
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

November 10, 2009

Firstly we would like to thank ALLAH (almighty) for giving us the opportunity
and recourses to be able to do something productive with our lives. Without his
blessings we would not have been able to come as far as we have.
Then our sincere thanks to Sir Asif Saeed Naji of (Introduction to Business
Finance) for helping us throughout this report. The report helped us find new ways
of being innovative and creative. This report would not have been possible without
his motivation & cooperation and continuous direction.

Page
Last but not the least we would like to thank our families for their incessant
support and approval. 7

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

COMPANY’S PROFILE
In 1894, Maulvi Ferozuddin Khan established the business House of Ferozsons through the
creation of a publishing House - Ferozsons Limited. From the beginning, Ferozuddin Khan's
vision of business extended beyond wealth creation, and firmly incorporated the enrichment of
human life in the under-developed South Asian region.
Thus the publishing house was created not only as a means of creating wealth, but as one of
spreading literacy and education among the masses of the sub-continent.
In the same spirit, Ferozsons Laboratories Limited was created in 1956 as one of the first
pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities in the fledgling state of Pakistan, to ensure a constant
and reliable source of quality medicines for the people of the nation as experienced its birth
pangs.
The Company possesses strong brands in cardiology, gastroenterology, oncology and
dermatology. We also have a long history of contract manufacture for Multinational
Corporations, and a successful track record of in-licensing of products. Among other principals,
Ferozsons currently represents the Boston Scientific Corporation, USA, for its range of
interventional products and devices in the Pakistan market.

Though now an independent entity and a public limited company listed on the country's three
stock exchanges, the founder's spirit still courses through the company's veins.

BOARD OF
DIRECTORS

Page
MRS. AKHTAR KHALID CHAIRPERSON &CHIEF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
WAHEED EXECUTIVE 8
MR. OSMAN KHALID PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
WAHEED

MR. OMAR KHALID GENERAL MANAGER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR


WAHEED

MRS. MUNIZE AZHAR NON-EXECUTIVE


DIRECTOR

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

MR. FAROOQ MAZHAR NON-EXECUTIVE


DIRECTOR

MR. NIHAL CASSIM NON-EXECUTIVE


DIRECTOR

MR. M.M. ISPAHANI NON-EXECUTIVE


DIRECTOR

MR. DOST M. KHAN NON-EXECUTIVE


SHERPAO DIRECTOR

MR. M. KHALIL MAIN NON-EXECUTIVE


DIRECTOR

Mission
Statement

Page
We aim to improve the Quality of Life 9
through the ethical promotion and sales of

world class medicines at locally relevant prices.

In doing so we will:

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Strive to provide best-in-industry

returns to our shareholders.

Be the Second to None in Employee Training,

Reward and Motivation.

Maintain the Highest Levels of Ethics

while focusing on building our portfolio

of Prescription Brands.

Page
10

CALCULATION
AND
BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

INTERPRETATION
ON CROSS
SECTIONAL
ANALYSIS

CALCULATION OF RATIOS

S.N RATIOS FORMULA 2006 2007 2008 Page


11
O

1. CURRENT RATIO Current assets__ 317,048, 442,376,9 509,539,1


714 88 06

Current liabilities 110,712, 154,258,2 196,169,6


695 34 63

2.86 2.86 2.59

2. QUICK RATIO Quick assets___ 111,562, 260,587,9 254,736,2

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

545 11 26

Current liabilities 110,712, 154,258,2 196,169,6


695 34 63

1.00 1.68 1.29

3. CASH RATIO Cash_______ 12,301,8 41,680,94 35,807,46


64 0 1

Current liabilities 110,712, 154,258,2 196,169,6


695 34 63

0.11 0.27 0.18

4. WORKING CAPITAL Current assets - 317,048, 442,376,9 509,539,1


Current 714 88 06

liabilities - - -
110,712, 154,258,2 196,169,6
695 34 63

206,336 288,118, 313,369,


,019 754 443

5. DEBT RATIO Total 162,944, 278,772,4 403,380,2


liabilities/Debts 468 74_ 32_

Total assets 942,466, 1,218,361 1,481,628


081 ,366 ,536
0.17
0.22 0.27

6. DEBT TO EQUITY Total 162,944, 278,772,4 403,380,2


RATIO liabilities/Debs 468 74 32

Page
Total S.H.E 517,083, 682,604,6 826,236,8
613 07 91
12
0.31 0.40 0.48

7. TIME INTEREST Operating 318,137, 258,513,1 294,149,4


EARNED profit/EBIT 394 12 61

Interest expense 2,268,56 1,663,208 1,487,228


0
156.43 197.78
97.15

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

8. A/R TURNOVER Net credit sales 752,221, 922,368,5 932,297,9


631 42 94
Average A/R
12,611,9 22,274,32 28,195,98
31 2 7

59.64 41.40 33.06


times times times

9. AVG.COLLECTION 360____ 360_ 360_ 360_


PERIOD
A/R turnover 59.64 41.40 33.06

6 days 9 days 10.88


days

10. INVENTORY COGS_________ 322,838, 415,507,4 391,559,4


TURNOVER 328 67 32
Avg. inventory
145,341, 139,578,6 157,301,9
209 99 87

2.22 2.97 2.48


times times times

11. FIXED ASSETS Net sales__ 752,221, 922,368,5 932,297,9


TURNOVER 631 42 94
Fixed assets
625,417, 775,984,3 972,089,4
367 78 30

1.20 1.18 0.95


times times times

12. TOTAL ASSETS Net sales_ 752,221, 922,368,5 932,297,9


TURNOVER 631 42 94

Page
Total assets
942,466, 1,218,361 1,481,628 13
081 ,366 ,536

0.79 0.75 0.62


times times times

13. GROSS PROFIT Gross profit 429,383, 506,861,0 540,738,5


MARGIN 303 75 62
Net sales
752,221, 922,368,5 932,297,9
631

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

0.57*100 42 94

57% 0.54*10 0.58*100


0
54% 58%

S.N RATIOS FORMULA 2006 2007 2008


O

14. OPERATING Operating profit 220,405, 360,176,3 294,149,4


PROFIT MARGIN 954 20 61
Net sales
752,221, 922,368,5 932,297,9
631 42 94
0.29*100 0.28*100 0.31*100

29% 28% 31%

15. NET PROFIT Net profit 175,868, 200,254,1 217,023,8


MARGIN 715 60 29

Net sales 752,221, 922,368,5 932,297,9


631 42 94

0.23*100 0.21*100 0.23*100

Page
23% 21% 23%

16. RETURN ON Net profit 175,868, 200,254,1 217,023,8 14


ASSETS 715 60 29

Total assets 942,466, 1,218,361 1,481,628


081 ,366 ,536

0.19*100 0.16*100 0.15*100

19% 16% 15%

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

17. RETURN ON Net profit 175,868, 200,254,1 217,023,8


EQUITY 715 60 29
T.S.H.E
517,083, 682,604,6 826,236,8
613 07 91

0.342*10 0.293*10 0.262*10


0 0 0

34.2% 29.3% 26.2%

CROSS SECTIONAL ANALYSIS (RESULTS) Page


15
S.N RATIOS COMPANY’S INDUSTRY’S DECISION
O RESULT RESULT

1. CURRENT RATIO 2.59 1.6 BETTER

2. QUICK RATIO 1.29 1.2 BETTER

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

3. CASH RATIO 0.18 0.8 WORSE

4. WORKING CAPITAL 313,369,443 5,000,000 BETTER

5. DEBT RATIO 0.27 0.45 BETTER

6. DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO 0.48 0.55 BETTER

7. TIME INTEREST EARNED 197.78 TIMES 18 TIMES


BETTER
8. A/R TURNOVER 33.06 TIMES 18 TIMES

9. AVERAGE COLLECTION 10.88 DAYS 20 DAYS BETTER


PERIOD
10. 2.48 TIMES 25 TIMES
INVENTORY TURNOVER
BETTER
11. 0.95 TIMES 10 TIMES
FIXED ASSETS
12. TURNOVER 0.62 TIMES 6 TIMES
WORSE
13. TOTAL ASSETS 58% 25%
TURNOVER
14. 31% 20% WORSE
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
15. 23% 15%
OPERATING PROFIT

Page
WORSE
16. MARGIN 15% 10%
16
17. NET PROFIT MARGIN 26.2% 12%
BETTER
RETURN ON ASSETS

RETURN ON EQUITY BETTER

BETTER

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

BETTER

BETTER

CROSS SECTIONAL ANALYSIS INTERPRETATION FOR


2008
CURRENT RATIO:
Current ratio measures a firm’s ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the

Page
relationship between current assets and current liabilities.
17
In this company current ratio is 2.59 times. It means that the company’s current assets are 2.59
times more than that of its current liabilities.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position, because company’s current ratio is more than that of industry’s
current ratio.

QUICK RATIO:
BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Quick ratio measures a firm’s ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the relationship
between quick assets and current liabilities.

In this company quick ratio is 1.29 times. It means that the company’s quick assets are 1.29
times more than that of its current liabilities.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position, because company’s quick ratio is more than industry’s quick ratio.

CASH RATIO:
Cash ratio measures a firm’s ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the relationship
between cash and current liabilities.

In this company cash ratio is 0.18 times. It means that the company’s cash ratio is 0.18 times
more than that of its current liabilities.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of industry, company’s results are
showing WORSE position, because company’s cash ratio is less than industry’s cash ratio.

WORKING CAPITAL:
Working capital measures a firm’s ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the
difference between current assets and current liabilities.

In this company working capital is Rs. 313,369,443. It means that the company’s working capital
is Rs.313,369,443 times more than that of its current liabilities.

Page
If we compare the results of the company with the results of industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position, because company’s working capital is more than industry’s working 18
capital.

DEBT RATIO:
Debt ratio measures a firm’s ability to meet its long term obligations. It shows the relationship
between total debts and total assets.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

In this company debt ratio is 0.27 times. It means that the company’s total debts are 0.27 times of
its total assets.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position, because company’s debt ratio is less than that of industry’s debt
ratio.

DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO:


Debt to equity ratio measures a firm’s ability to meet its long term obligations. It shows the
relationship between total debts and total share holder’s equity.

In this company debt to equity ratio is 0.48 times. It means the company’s total liability is 0.48
of its total share holder equity.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position than industry’s results, because company’s debt to equity ratio is less
than that of industry’s debt to equity ratio.

TIME INTEREST EARNED:


Time interest earned indicates that how many times a company can pay its interest expense from
its operating profit.

In this company time interest earned ratio is 197.78 times. It means that a company can pay it

Page
interest expense 197.78 times from its operating profit.
19
If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position, because time interest earned ratio is more than that of industry’s
time interest earned ratio.

ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE TURNOVER:

Account receivable turnover ratio indicates that how many times a company converts its
receivable into cash during a year.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

In this company account receivable turnover ratio is 33.06 times. It means that a company
converts its receivables into cash 33.06 times during a year.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company’s account receivable turnover ratio is more than
that of industry’s account receivable turnover ratio.

AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD:

Average collection period indicates that how many days a company converts it’s receivable into
cash during a year.

In this company average collection period is 10.88 days. It means that a company converts its
receivables into cash after every 10.88 days during a year.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company’s average collection period is less than that of
industry average collection period.

INVENTORY TURNOVER:
Inventory turnover ratio indicates that how many times a company converts its inventory into
cash or sales during a year.

In this company inventory turnover ratio is 2.48 times. It means that a company converts its

Page
inventory into cash or sales 2.48 times during a year.
20
If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company’s inventory turnover ratio is less than that of
industry inventory turnover ratio.

FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER:


Fixed assets turnover ratio indicates that how many times a company generated revenue from its
fixed assets of its own worth.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

In this company fixed assets turnover ratio is 0.95 times. It means that a company fixed assets
generate total revenue 0.95 times of its own worth.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company’s fixed assets turnover ratio is less than that of an
industry fixed assets turnover ratio.

TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER:

Total assets turnover ratio indicates that how many times a company generated revenue from its
total assets of its own worth.

In this company total assets turnover ratio is 0.62 times. It means that company total assets
generate total revenue 0.62 times of its own worth.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company’s total assets turnover ratio is less than that of an
industry total assets turnover ratio.

GROSS PROFIT MARGIN:


Gross profit margin shows the relationship between gross profit and net sales. It is a percentage
of gross profit based on the value of net sales.

In this company gross profit margin is 0.58 or 58%. It means that a company generates gross

Page
profit of 0.58 or 58% based on the value of net sales.
21
If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company’s gross profit margin is more than that of an
industry gross profit margin.

OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN:

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Operating profit margin shows the relationship between operating profit and net sales. It is a
percentage of operating profit based on the value of net sales.

In this company operating profit margin is 0.31 or 31%. It means that a company generates
operating profit of 0.31 or 31% based on the value of net sales.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company’s operating profit margin is more than that of an
industry operating profit margin.

NET PROFIT MARGIN:

Net profit margin shows the relationship between net profit and net sales. It is a percentage of net
profit based on the value of net sales.

In this company net profit margin is 0.23 or 23%. It means that a company generates net profit of
0.23 or 23% based on the value of net sales.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company’s net profit margin is less than that of an industry
net profit margin.

RETURN ON ASSETS:

Return on assets shows the relationship between net profit and total assets. It is a percentage of
net profit based on the value of total assets.

Page
In this company return on assets is 0.14 or 14%. It means that a company generates net profit of 22
0.14 or 14% based on the value of total assets.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company’s return on assets is more than that of an industry
return on assets.

RETURN ON EQUITY:

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Return on equity shows the relationship between net profit and total shareholders’ equity. It is a
percentage of net profit based on the value of total shareholders’ equity.

In this company return on equity is 0.262 or 26.2%. It means that a company generates net profit
of 0.262 or 26.2% based on the value of total shareholders’ equity.

If we compare the results of the company with the results of the industry, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company’s return on equity is more than that of an industry
return on equity.

Page
23

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

GRAPHICAL
PRESENTATION ON
CROSS SECTIONAL
ANALYSIS

Page
24

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
25

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
26

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
27

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

TIME SERIES
ANALYSIS FOR
2008
Page
28

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

SHORT TERM SOLVENCY RATIOS:

CURRENT RATIO:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

2.86 2.86 2.59 WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

Current ratio measures the firm's ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the
relationship between current assets and current liabilities.

In year 2006 current ratio was 2.86 times. It means current assets were 2.86 times more than that
of its current liabilities. In year 2007 the current ratio was also 2.86 times, and in 2008 it is
decreased to 2.59 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's current ratio is showing decreasing trend.

QUICK RATIO:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION Page


29
1.00 1.68 1.29 BETTER

INTERPRETATION:

Quick ratio measures the firm's ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the
relationship between quick assets and current liabilities.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

In year 2006 quick ratio was 1.00 times. It means quick assets were 1.00 times more than that of
its current liabilities. In year 2007 the quick ratio was 1.68 times, and in 2008 it is reached to
1.29 times (the result shows mixed trend).

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's current ratio is showing increasing trend.

CASH RATIO:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

0.11 0.27 0.18 BETTER

INTERPRETATION:

Cash ratio measures the firm's ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the relationship
between cash and current liabilities.

In year 2006 cash ratio was 0.11 times. It means cash were 0.11times more than that of its
current liabilities. In year 2007 the cash was 0.27 times, and in 2008 it is decreased to 0.18 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's current ratio is showing mixed trend (if we
compare it with 2006 the result is showing increasing trend).

Page
WORKING CAPITAL: 30
2006 2007 2008 DECISION

203,336,019 288,118,754 313,369,443 BETTER

INTERPRETATION:

Working capital measures the firm's ability to meet its short term obligations. It shows the
difference between current assets and current liabilities.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

In year 2006 working capital was 206,336,019. It means working capital were 206,336,019 times
more than that of its current liabilities. In year 2007 the working capital was also 288,118,754,
and in 2008 it is increased to 313,369,443.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's current ratio is showing increasing trend.

LONG TERM SOLVENCY RATIOS:


DEBT RATIO:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

0.17 0.22 0.27 WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

Debt ratio measures the firm's ability to meet its long term obligations. It shows the relationship
between total debts and total liabilities.

In year 2006 debt ratio was 0.17 times. It means debts were 0.17 times more than that of its total
assets. In year 2007 the debt ratio was also 0.22 times, and in 2008 it is increased to 0.27 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's debt ratio is showing increasing trend.

Page
31
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

0.31 0.40 0.48 WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Debt to equity ratio measures the firm's ability to meet its long term obligations. It shows the
relationship between total debts and total share holder’s equity.

In year 2006 debt to equity ratio was 0.31 times. It means debts to equity were 0.31 times more
than that of its total share holder’s equity. In year 2007 the debt to equity ratio was also 0.40
times, and in 2008 it is increased to 0.48 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's debt ratio is showing increasing trend.

TIME INTEREST EARNED:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

97.15 156.43 197.78 BETTER

INTERPRETATION:

Time interest earned ratio measures the firm's ability to meet its long term obligations. It shows
the relationship between operating profit and interest expense.

In year 2006 debt to time interest earned ratio was 97.15 times. It means time interest earned
ratio were 97.15 times more than that of its interest expense. In year 2007 the time interest
earned ratio was also 156.43 times, and in 2008 it is increased to 197.78 times.

Page
If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's debt ratio is showing increasing trend. 32

ASSETS UTILIZATION RATIOS:


ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE TURNOVER:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

59.64 times 41.40 times 33.06 times WORSE

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

INTERPRETATION:

Account receivable turnover ratio indicates how efficiently management utilizes its assets in
generating revenue by relating or comparing sales to different types of assets.

In year 2006 account receivable turnover ratio was 59.64 times. It means the firm can convert its
account receivables into cash 59.64 times. In year 2007 the account receivable turnover ratio was
41.40 times, and in 2008 it is decreased to 33.06 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's account receivable turnover ratio is showing
decreasing trend.

AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

6 DAYS 9 DAYS 11 DAYS WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

Average collection period indicates how efficiently management utilizes its assets in generating
revenue by relating or comparing sales to different types of assets.

It shows the relationship between days and account receivable turnover.

In year 2006 average collection period was 6 days. It means the firm can collect its account Page
33
receivables within 6 days. In year 2007 the average collection period was 9 days, and in 2008 it
is increased to 11 days.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's account receivable turnover ratio is showing
increasing trend.

INVENORY TURNOVER:
BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

2.22 times 2.97 times 2.48 times BETTER

INTERPRETATION:

Inventory turnover ratio indicates how many times a company converts its inventory into cash or
sales during a year.

It shows the relationship between costs of goods sold and average inventory.

In year 2006 inventory turnover ratio was 2.22 times. It means the firm can convert its inventory
into cash or sales 2.22 times. In year 2007 the inventory turnover ratio was 2.97 times, and in
2008 it is decreased to 2.48 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's inventory turnover ratio is showing increasing
trend.

FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

1.20 times 1.18 times 0.95 times WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

Fixed assets turnover ratio indicates that how many times revenue can be generated by the fixed
assets of its own worth.

Page
In year 2006 fixed assets turnover ratio was 1.20 times. It means the firm’s fixed assets can 34
generate total revenue 1.20 times. In year 2007 the fixed assets turnover ratio was 1.18 times,
and in 2008 it is decreased to 0.95 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's fixed asset turnover ratio is showing decreasing
trend.

TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER:

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

0.79 times 0.75 times 0.62 times WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

Total assets turnover ratio indicates that how many times revenue can be generated by the total
assets of its own worth.

In year 2006 total assets turnover ratio was 0.79 times. It means the firm’s total assets can
generate total revenue 0.79 times. In year 2007 the total assets turnover ratio was 0.75 times, and
in 2008 it is decreased to 0.62 times.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's total asset turnover ratio is showing decreasing
trend.

PROFITABILITY RATIO:
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

57% 54% 58% BETTER

Page
INTERPRETATION:

Gross profit margin ratio measures the overall record of management in producing profit. It
35
shows the relationship between gross profit and net sales.

In year 2006 gross profit margin ratio was 57%. It means the firm’s generate gross profit of 57%
based on the value of net sales. In year 2007 the gross profit margin ratio was 54%, and in 2008
it is increased to 58%.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's gross profit margin ratio is showing increasing
trend.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

29% 28% 31% BETTER

INTERPRETATION:

Operating profit margin ratio measures the overall record of management in producing profit. It
shows the relationship between operating profit and net sales.

In year 2006 operating profit margin ratio was 29%. It means the firm’s generate operating
profit of 29% based on the value of net sales. In year 2007 the operating profit margin ratio was
28%, and in 2008 it is increased to 31%.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's operating profit margin ratio is showing
increasing trend.

NET PROFIT MARGIN:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

23% 21% 23% BETTER

Page
INTERPRETATION:
36
NET profit margin ratio measures the overall record of management in producing profit. It shows
the relationship between net profit and net sales.

In year 2006 net profit margin ratio was 23%. It means the firm’s generate net profit of 23%
based on the value of net sales. In year 2007 the net profit margin ratio was 21%, and in 2008 it
is increased to 23%.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing BETTER position because company's net profit margin ratio is showing
increasing/consistence trend.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

RETURN ON ASSETS:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

18.7% 16.43% 14.64% WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

Return on asset ratio measures the overall record of management in producing profit on the value
on total assets. It shows the relationship between net profit and total assets.

In year 2006 return on asset ratio was 18.7%. It means the firm’s generate g profit of 18.7%
based on the value of total assets. In year 2007 the return on asset ratio was 16.43%, and in 2008
it is decreased to 14.64%.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's return on asset ratio is showing decreasing trend.

RETURN ON EQUITY:
2006 2007 2008 DECISION

34.2% 29.3% 26.2% WORSE

Page
37
INTERPRETATION:

Return on equity ratio measures the overall record of management in producing profit on the
value of total share holder’s equity. It shows the relationship between profit and total share
holder’s equity.

In year 2006 return on equity ratio was 34.2%. It means the firm’s generate profit of 34.2%
based on the value of total share holder’s equity. In year 2007 the return on equity ratio was
29.3%, and in 2008 it is decreased to 26.2%.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time, company’s results are
showing WORSE position because company's return on equity ratio is showing decreasing trend.

EARNING PER SHARE:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

14.59 16.16 15 WORSE

INTERPRETATION:

Earnings per share are the earning of the company on each share. It shows relationship between
net income and number of shares issued. It is generally more considerable by the shareholders.

In 2006 earnings per share was Rs.14.59. it means that company earns Rs.14.59. And in 2007 it
was increased to Rs.16.16 and in 2008 it has reached to Rs.15.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time company’s results are showing
WORSE position because there is an increasing trend in company’s earnings per share.

DIVIDEND PER SHARE:

2006 2007 2008 DECISION

Page
4 3.22 5.22 BETTER 38

INTERPRETATION:

Dividend per share is linked with Earning per Share of the company. As dividend is eventually
shareholder’s profit. It shows relationship between total dividend paid and number of shares
issued.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

In 2006 dividend per share was Rs.4. it means that company can paid dividend of Rs.4 on per
share. And in 2007 it was decreased to Rs.3.22 and in 2008 it has reached to Rs.5.22.

If we evaluate the performance of the firm over the period of time company’s results are showing
BETTER position because there is an increasing trend in company’s dividend per share.

Page
39

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

GRAPHICAL
PRESENTATION ON TIME
SERIES ANALYSIS

Page
40

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
41

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
42

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Page
43

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

COMMON SIZE
BALANCE SHEET
AND INCOME
STATEMENT FOR
2007-2008

Page
44

Ferozsons laboratories limited Pakistan

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Common size balance sheet


As at June 30th, 2007-2008

2007 2008

ASSETS % %

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and bank balances 3.421 2.416

Loan and advances 0.2801 0.3077

Deposits and payments 0.247 0.392

Other receivables 1.063 0.102

Trade debts 2.621 1.650

Stock in trade 10.983 12.201

Advance income tax 0.276 ---------

Stores and spares 0.3513 0.276

Short term investment 15.345 13.125

Accrued interest 0.2983 0.0859

Current portion of long term loan 1.4209 3.830

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 36.30% 34.390%

FIXED ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment 45.190 41.2375

Page
Long term investment 12.279 13.729 45
Long term loan 6.174 10.5331

Long term deposits 0.049 0.0533

Derivative Asset-Interest Rate Swap ------------- 0.055

TOTAL FIXED ASSETS 63.70% 65.609%

TOTAL ASSETS 100% 100%

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

2007 2008

EQUITIES AND LIABILITIES % %

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Trade and other payables 10.7541 7.8577

Accrued markup on long term financing 0.1321 0.3939

Current portion of long term liabilities 1.4209 3.8302

Current portion of liabilities against assets 0.3538 0.1619

Provision for tax - net ---------- 10.1297

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 12.661% 13.240%

NON CURRENT LIABILITIES

Long term financing - secured 6.171 10.533

Liabilities against assets subject to financing lease 0.0840 0.098

Deferred liability for taxation 3.964 3.353

TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES 10.218% 13.985%

Page
CAPITAL AND RESERVES

Share capital 9.895 9.764 46


Capital reserves 0.026 0.021

Revenue reserves 46.104 45.979

TOTAL SHARE HOLDER’S EQUITY 56.026% 55.765%

SURPLUS ON ASSETS %22.5 %17.5

TOTAL EQUITIES 100% 100%

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Ferozsons laboratories limited Pakistan


Common size income statement
For the year ended June 30th, 2007-2008

2007 2008
Sales 100% 100%

Cost of goods sold (45%) (42%)

Gross profit 55% 58%

Other operating income 2.78% 2.23%

Administrative expenses (5.59%) (6.51%)

Selling and distribution cost (23.48%) (21.39%)

Finance cost (0.18%) (0.15%)

Other charges (1.91%) (2.26%)

Share in profit of Farmacia 98% owned partnership firm 1.22% 1.47%

Profit before taxation 28.02% 31.32%

Page
Provision for taxation (6.31%) (8.11%)
47
Profit after taxation 23.27% 21.71%

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

INTERNAL
GROWTH RATE
AND
SUSTAINABLE Page
48
GROWTH RATE

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

INTERNAL GROWTH RATE

FORMULA: IGR = ROA * b * 100

1- (ROA * b)

ROA = Net Profit / Loss

Total Assets

ROA = 217023829

1481628536

ROA = 14.64% or 0.1464

Page
Dividend payout ratio = dividend paid

Net profit
49
Dividend payout ratio= 75538996

217023829

Dividend payout ratio = 34.80% or 0 .3480

Retention ratio = 1-0.3480

0.6520 Or 65.20%
BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

IGR = 0.1464*0.6520 *100

1-(0.1464*0.6520)

INTERNAL GROWTH RATE = 10.55%

SUSTAINABLE GROWTH RATE


FORMULA: SGR = ROE* b * 100

1-(ROE* b)

ROE = Net Profit / Loss

Total S.H.E

ROE = 217023829

826236891

R0E = 26.26% Or 0.2626

Retention Ratio =1- dividend payout ratio

Dividend payout ratio = 75538996 Page


50
217023829

Dividend payout ratio = 34.80% or 0 .3480

Retention ratio = 1-0.3480

0.6520 Or 65.20%

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Sustainable growth rate = 0.2626*0.6520 *100

1-(0.2626 * 0.6520)

SUSTAINABLE GROWTH RATE = 20.65%

PROFORMA
BALANCE SHEET
AND PROFORMA
INCOME
Page
STATEMENT
51

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Ferozsons laboratories limited Pakistan


Pro forma balance sheet
As at June 30th, 2008-2009

2008 2009

ASSETS Increased by
20.65%
CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and bank balances 35,807,461 43,201,701.


7

Loan and advances 4,560,060 5,501,712.3


9

Deposits and payments 5,809,956 7,009,711.9


14

Other receivables 1,530,284 1,846,287.6

Page
4
52
Trade debts 24,454,201 29,503,993.
51

Stock in trade 180,787,784 218,120,461


.4

Advance income tax ------------ ---------

Stores and spares 4,091,300 4,936,153.4


5

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Short term investment 194,474,564 234,633,561


.5

Accrued interest 1,273,496 1,536,472.9


24

Current portion of long term loan 56,750,000 68,468,875

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 509,539,46 614,758,93


1 1.4

FIXED ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment 610,987,413 737,156,313
.8

Long term investment 203,425,956 278,008,915


.9

Long term loan 156,062,500 188,289,406


.3

Long term deposits 790,870 954,184.655

Derivative Asset-Interest Rate Swap 822,691 992,576.70

TOTAL FIXED ASSETS 972,089,43 1,172,825,


0 897

TOTAL ASSETS 1,481,628 1,787,584


,536 ,829

Page
53

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009
2008 2009

EQUITIES AND LIABILITIES


CURRENT LIABILITIES

Trade and other payables 116,423,214 140,464,607


.7

Accrued markup on long term financing 5,588,157 6,742,111.4


21

Current portion of long term liabilities 56,750,000 68,468,875

Current portion of liabilities against assets 2,399,815 2,895,376.7


9

Provision for tax – net 15,008,477 18,107,727.


5

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 196,169, 116,028,6


663 98.4
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES

Long term financing - secured 156,062,500 188289406.


3

Liabilities against assets subject to financing 1,456,643 1757439.78


lease
Deferred liability for taxation 49,691,426 59952705.4
7

TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES 207,210, 24999955


569 1.5

Page
CAPITAL AND RESERVES

Share capital 144,672,768 174,547,694


54
.6

Capital reserves 321,843 388,303.57

Revenue reserves 681,242,280 821,918,810


.8

TOTAL EQUITIES 1,481,62 1,787,584


8,536 ,829

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Ferozsons laboratories limited Pakistan


Pro forma income statement
As at June 30th, 2008-2009

2008 2009
Sales 932,297,9 1,124,817,
94 530

Cost of goods sold (391,559, (472,416,4


432) 54.7)

Gross profit 540,738,5 652,401,07


62 5.3

Page
Other operating income 20,809,63 25,106,094
0 .7
55
Administrative expenses (60,719,2 (73,257,80
76) 6.50)

Selling and distribution cost (199,424, (240,605,8


660) 52.3)

Finance cost (1,487,22 (1,794,340.


8) 58)

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Other charges (21,073,7 (25,425,53


92) 0.05)

Share in profit of Farmacia 98% owned partnership firm 13,818,99 16,672,619


7 .88

Profit before taxation 292,662,2 353,096,98


33 4.1

Provision for taxation (75,638,4 (91,257,73


04) 4.4)

Profit after taxation 217,023, 261,839,2


829 49.7

Page
Ferozsons laboratories limited Pakistan
56
Plug variable
For the year ended June 30th, 2008-2009

Profit from pro forma statement 261839249

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

Less: addition to retained earnings (170617918)


Possible dividend payment 91223131

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. The cash ratio of the company is showing worse position. To improve the
condition of cash the company should pay less cash dividend and retain

Page
more.
To generate more revenue the company should increase its sales due to 57
increase in the volume of sales the account receivable will automatically
increase.

2. Before paying debts company should issue ordinary shares and bonds
instead of borrowing from financial institutions, it will also help to increase
in cash.

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009
FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LIMITED
2009

3. The condition of inventory is also worst; to improve in inventory the


company should reduce the price to sale more inventory.

4. More fixed assets should be purchased, and also change outdated machines,
which also help to maximize profit.

5. The company should move towards advance technology to reduce its cost,
advance and latest technology will help to generate more revenue, same
time, and also help to minimize the cost of production.

6. Overall performance of the company is better than industry.

Page
58

BY NAVEED SHERAZ
IBF SEC-B FALL 2009

Anda mungkin juga menyukai