RIP OSPF EIGRP BGP

1. Type Protocol Distance Vector Link State Advanced Distance Vector Path Vector
(Hybrid)
2. IPv6 Update RIPng OSPFv3 EIGRP for IPv6 BGPv4 for IPv6
3. Developed RIP: 1988 OSPF: 1991 1993, standard 2013, BGP: 1989
RIPv2: 1993 OSPFv2:(MANEJEMEN
ISH2H4 1998 international 2016
JARINGAN BGPv2: 1990
RIPng: 1997 OSPFv3: 2008
KOMPUTER) BGPv3: 1993
TUGAS INDIVIDU SI3903 & BGPv4: 2006
4. Advantages 1. Very easy to 1. Minimizes the 1.
SI3906 Partial updates 1. Provide the routing
understand and SEMESTER
number of GENAProuting 2016/2017
converse network between these
configure table PENGUMPULAN:
WAKTU entries bandwidth,
MINGGU KE 3 only routing autonomous systems
2. Supported by 2. Contains(TIGA)
LSA table changes, not the and take advantages of
almost all flooding to a entire are propagated all TCP function
routers and load reasonable area when a changes occur 2. Uses the concept of
balancing 3. Each routing 2. Support for IP, autonomous system
3. Generally device takes a copy AppleTalk and IPX (AS), in which is a group
loop free and of the LSA updates 3. Run directly over IP, of networks under
stable in routing its LSDB and using protocol number 88 common
table forward the LSA to 4. Support for all layer 2 administration.
4. Faster lookup all neighbor device (data link) protocols and 3. A routing protocol
and smaller within area topologies that exchanges routing
routing updates 4. Minimized the 5. Load balancing across information between AS
sent & received impact of a topology equal-and unequal-cost and able t suppress
change pathways instability such as route
5. Enforces the 6. Multicast and unicast damping, implementing
concept of a instead of broadcast various timers, soft
hierarchical network address configuration and rote
design 7. Support for refresh
6. Provides shortest authentication 4. BGP neighbors are
path routing and is 8. Manual summarization called peers and must
fast to fault- at any interface be statistically
discovery and 9. 100% loop-free configured.
rerouting. classless routing 5. BGP peers exchange
7. Consumes 10. Easy transition to IPv6 incremental, triggered
minimal link with multi-address family route updates and
overhead when the support both networks periodic keep alive.
network is in steady 11. Superior scaling of IGP 6. The AS PATH serves
state for large dynamic as a powerful and
8. Has been multipoint (DM) VPN versatile mechanism for
endorsed by IETF deployments policy-based routing
and implemented by 12. Very fast rapid that allows
many vendors convergence times for straightforward
changes in the network suppression of the
topology looping of routing
13. More efficient use of information
links, through equal cost 6. Able to handle
multipath (ECMP) and thousands of routes in
unequal cost load sharing its database, it was
designed to scale with
the growth of Internet
5. Disadvantages 1. The network 1. Router cannot 1. Automatically 1. Need lots of memory
is restricted to determine the summarize routes at the and CPU cycles if run
15 hops in order recent update when classful boundaries default less
to solve the two different link- 2. Maintains the 2. There is no backward
count to state updates arrive adjacency relationship by compatibility, in case of
infinity at approximately sending HELLO message a downgrade, BGP
problem the same time to each other periodically, configuration are lost
2. The periodic (Unsynchronized even though running on 3. There is no support
broadcast of the updates) dial link for nonstop routing
routing table 2. Demands a 3. Do not have an Area 4. Slowest convergence
consumes higher processing like concept, so it is not among all and lack of
bandwidth and memory good at dealing with big policy synchronization
3. The slow requirement hierarchal network 5. Does not load
convergence because maintains 4. Sets up a full mesh balance across links by
may cause multiple copies of adjacency relationship default
*Please submit in the handwritten form with complete table.
I pray for your success
Muharman Lubis