CHEM 464L
December 5, 2016
Abstract:
reaction of the substrate pyruvate to lactate with the help of the cofactor
to isolate LDH from rabbit muscle then purify it using ammonium sulfate
The total activity of B-1 has been calculated to be 4.52 LDH unit/ml and 1.08
LDH unit/mL for B-11. The specific activity was determined to be 28.25U/mg
for B-1 and 435U/mg for B-11. The purification factor is 15.39 and the
presence of the inhibitor Km is 0.116mM and Vmax is 0.212 A/min. the type
then purify it using ammonium sulfate precipitation and affi gel blue affinity
and fractionate protein based on their polarity and solubility (2). Ammonium sulfate
is a salt that separates proteins from water ion which makes the protein precipitates
after they separate from water. This method is preformed more than once by adding
more salt each time to assure a complete separation of protein. Each protein needs
different levels of ammonium sulfate saturation where the most polar protein will
is similar to the structure of NADH which enables LDH to bind to it. Affi-gel blue is
also a good visualization method since it is blue so when it forms a pellet in bottom
of the tube it can be viewed and can be concluded that the LDH is in the bottom
with it (1). To further purify an addition of a specific elution buffer that contains
NADH is applied to separate LDH from affi-gel blue since LDH has a higher affinity
towered NADH. The supernatant will contain the LDH purified solution.
LDH assay involves some further dilution of the LDH affi gel
purification factor at the end by dividing the specific activity of affi- gel blue
blender in 0.03M KOH. The homogenate was then filtered through six layers
of cheesecloth and the volume was estimated and 1.5 volumes of KOH was
ammonium sulfate suspension of LDH was measured and labeled then stored
in a refrigerator.
transferred to the tube containing the AGB and centrifuged then supernatant
supernatant was discarded again. AGB was lastly washed with spacific
elution buffer containing NADH. This solution is called AGB purified LDH
solution ( B-11).
LDH assay:
40 with buffer this makes the C-2 solution. B-11 solution was diluted 1 to 10
with buffer this makes the C-2 solution. Kinetic node spectrophotometer was
used at wave length 340nm to measure the activity of C-1 and C-2 where
100 ul was used for both with 1 ml of water, 1ml of buffer, 0.7 ml of pyruvate
Protein determination:
0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.125 mg/ml of BSA. The unknown concentrations
proteins AGB purified LDH, the elution buffer, 1 to 25 dilution of B-1 and 1 to
Lowery and Folin reagents has been used then all tubes were heated for 15
minutes.
an inhibitor where kinetic mode spectrophotometer was used and a graph for
both measurements was obtained. First set of six measurements was done
water and the substrate pyruvate. The second sets of measurments was
inhibitor and a fixed volumes of water and pyruvate. The total volume in both
sets was 3 ml
Results:
B-1 is 4.52 LDH unit/ml and its spacific activity is 28.25U/mg. the total
activity of B-11 is 1.08 LDH unit/ml and its spacific activity is 435U/mg.
The purification factor is 15.39 and the percent recovery 47.8%. The total
around 0.25 A/min and 0.08mM with the absence of inhibition and around
1
f(x) = 7.53x + 0.06
0.8 R = 0.99
A660 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
mg/ml BSA
(Figure-1) the graph is showing the mg/ml of BSA protein and the absorbance
value at 660nm
mg/ml
Tube Sample A660 protein Column1
1 std 0 0
2 std 0.2666 0.025
3 std 0.4777 0.05
4 std 0.66 0.075
5 std 0.795 0.1
6 std 0.965 0.125
average=0.16m
7 B-1 1 to 25 0.1778 0.0086 g/ml
8 B-1 1 to 50 0.1322 0.002
9 B-11 0.2833 0.00248
10 elution buffer 0.1477
11 corrected 9 0.1356 0.00248
(Table-1) the table is showing the standed curve points and the result of
protein concentration for B-1 and B-11 protein
Pyruva Column With no Column With Column
te 1 Inhibitor 2 Inhibitor 3
[So] 1/[so] Vo 1/Vo Vo 1/Vo
0 0 0 0 0 0
0.083 12 0.1215 8.2 0.0867 11.5
0.167 6 0.1571 6.4 0.1292 7.7
0.25 4 0.176 5.7 0.1522 6.6
0.42 2.4 0.2218 4.5 0.1756 5.7
0.67 1.49 0.229 4.36 0.1719 5.8
0.92 1.1 0.2345 4.26 0.1768 5.7
(Table-2) this table shows the result of LDH characterization in the presence
and absence of inhibition.
0.2
0.15
Vo(A/Min)
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
[So](mM)
4
2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1/[So](1/mM)
Discussion:
In summary, inhibition type was determined to be a mixed inhibition
the presence of inhibition. The present recovery from affi-gel blue was
amount of substrate added [S] since everything else is constant including the
enzyme. Increasing [So] is going to make Vo increase causing a sigmoid
can be measured as the [So] when Vo is equal to Vmax. From this type of
Burk plot where there is going to be a linear graph and can easily measure
while Vmax has decreased moreover, the measured y- axis of the two graphs
are 3.89 and 4.71. based on these data we can conclude that the inhibition
a mixed inhibitor.
this experiment. One possible source of error expected is dealing with NADH
preforming dialysis because it is really hard to deal with the small bags
especially when applying the solution to them a person can loss all the
solutions due to leakage if not carful. A possiple source of error that might
have been expected is while preforming the protein determination assay due
to not correctly making the reagent which will not give an accurate result.
To conclude, the type of the obtained unknown inhibitor is a mixed
inhibitor and that was determined after looking at the Vmax and km values
Acknowledgment:
I would like to thank professor Rashyed for helping us and also would like to
thank my lap partners Elroma David and Marlein for for their assistance
References:
(2) Peng, F.; Bian, J.; Peng, P.; Xiao, H.; Ren, J.-L.; Xu, F.; Sun, R.-C.
Separation and characterization of Acetyl and Non-Acetyl
Hemicelluloses of Arundo donax by ammonium Sulfate Precipitation.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2012, 60 (16) (April 25),
40394047.