Anda di halaman 1dari 5

The Laryngoscope

Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia


0 1997 The American Laryngological,
Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Familial Occurrence of Unilateral


Vestibular Schwannoma
Nadim B. Bikhazi, MD; William H. Slattery 111, MD; Anil K. Lalwani, MD; Robert K. Jackler, MD;
Paul H. Bikhazi, MD; Derald E. Brackmann, MD

Vestibular schwannoma (VS)may present clin- neurofibromatosis type I1 (NF-2). In contrast, bilat-
ically in one of two forms: sporadic unilateral or eral VS occur exclusively in patients with NF-2 and
hereditary bilateral. Almost all cases of familial account for greater than 90% of patients diagnosed
transmission have been associated with the diag- with this syndrome.
nosis of neurofibromatosis type I1 (NF-2). In this
report, we describe nine families (18 individuals) Neurofibromatosis type 11, or central neurofi-
presenting with unilateral VS without evidence of bromatosis, is inherited in an autosomal dominant
NF-2. In four of the nine families, the affected indi- manner with a high degree of penetrance and occurs
viduals were of parent-offspring relationship, in with a prevalence of 1:210,000.1 The NF-2 gene,
three families they were cousin-cousin, and in the which has been localized to chromosome 22q12,2 en-
remaining two families, they were sibling-sibling codes a tumor suppressor product named merlin or
and aunt-nephew. No other members of the fami-
lies were diagnosed with NF-2. There was no evi- schwannomin.3 Mutations in this gene have been
dence for gender predilection or genomic imprint- associated with sporadic VS, NF-2-associated VS,
ing among affected individuals. This study meningioma, melanoma, breast carcinoma, and ma-
suggests that familial occurrence of unilateral VS lignant mesotheliomas.3-7 In this study, we describe
may be genetically inherited as it occurs more com- nine families (18 individuals) with familial occur-
monly than would be estimated by chance alone. rence of unilateral VS without other criteria needed
Future genetic studies will elucidate whether oc- for the diagnosis of NF-2. The clinical characteris-
currence of unilateral VS in these families repre- tics of these patients are detailed and the probabil-
sents a variable expression of NF-2, chance occur-
rence of unilateral VS in families, or a new genetic ity that this occurrence represents a new phenotypic
disorder. expression of VS is discussed.
Laryngoscope, 107:1176-1180,1997
MATERIAL AND METHODS
INTRODUCTION
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tu- Patients
mors that arise from the vestibular portion of the
eighth cranial nerve and account for more than 80% Families with more than one member with a unilat-
eral VS were retrospectively identified through a chart re-
of cerebellopontine angle tumors. Unilateral VS view of all cases of unilateral VS treated at the University
usually occur sporadically but may present in com- of California San Francisco (UCSF) from 1985 to 1995. Pa-
bination with other intracranial tumors as part of tients were also recruited both from an Acoustic Neuroma
Association (ANA) newsletter seeking families with more
than one unilateral VS and the House Ear Institute. After
identification, patients were sent questionnaires regard-
Presented a t the 100th Annual Meeting of The American Laryngo- ing characteristics of clinical presentation, tumor size,
logical, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona, May treatment, and subsequent follow-up. In addition, the clin-
12, 1997.
ical presentation, diagnosis, radiological imaging, and sur-
From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,
University of California, (N.B.B., A.K.L., R.K.J., P.H.B.), San Francisco, San gical pathology were verified from medical records. Pa-
Francisco and The House Ear Institute (w.H.s., D.E.B.),Los Angeles, Cali- tients with the diagnosis of NF-2 were excluded from this
fornia. study. In the absence of clinical symptoms and negative
Send Correspondence to Rohert K. Jackler, MD, 350 Parnassus Av- family history of NF-2, screening spinal MRI was not ob-
enue #210, San Francisco, CA 94117, U.S.A. tained.

Laryngoscope 107: September 1997 Bikhazi et al.: Familial Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma
1176
Inclusionary Criteria time of the study. Of the 18 individuals, 11 are
The following criteria were necessary for the diagno- women and seven are men. The most common pre-
sis of familial unilateral VS: senting symptoms included progressive hearing loss
(56%),vertigo (39%), imbalance (39%),and tinnitus
1. Histologically confirmed solitary, unilateral VS in (28%).None of the patients complained of sensory or
two or more family members. motor disturbance in the extremities. Of the 18 af-
2. No family members diagnosed with NF-2.
3. No intracranial tumors or contralateral VS on en- fected individuals, 13 had a normal ophthalmologic
hanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). examination within the past 5 years whereas the re-
4. A normal ophthalmologic examination (showing maining five (two of whom are deceased) had not
no evidence of posterior subcapsular cataracts o r seen a n ophthalmologist during this period. There
Lisch nodules) documented within the past 5 was an equal side distribution among the 18 tu-
years in at least one affected family member. mors. The maximum diameter of the tumor in the
5. No evidence of skin neurofibromas. cerebellopontine angle was greater than 3 cm in size
(large tumor) in half of the patients, between 1and
Probability Calculation 3 cm (medium) in 44% of the cases, and less than 1
The frequency with which a family would be expected cm (small) in 6%.
to present with more than one family member having VS There was no evidence of genomic imprinting,
was estimated using the combinatorial formula: which is defined as a gamete-dependent phenotype,
because gender type was equally distributed among
P (dr) = (Incidence) X -J!-.-
r!(n-r)! the parent-offspring presentations. An earlier age of
where P = the probability of occurrence, onset of symptoms was noted among subsequent
n = the number of family members, and generations (first generation average = 57.8 years,
r = the number of vestibular neuromas in one family. second generation average = 35.5 years). Among the
MRI scans obtained postoperatively in 13 patients
Assumptions in this calculation include the incidence ranging in age from 1 to 25 years, none demon-
of sporadic VS to be 1/100,000,~ the average number of
first generational family members to be 20, and the esti- strated contralateral VS or other intracranial tu-
mated number of families in the U.S. to be 12.5 million. mors. Five individuals without follow-up scans in-
The probability of occurrence was then calculated for a 10- cluded two who are deceased and three who are in
year period. The calculated expected incidence was then the early postoperative period (less than 1 year).
compared with the observed number of familial unilateral Clinical follow-up in this group ranged from 5
VS in the UCSF chart review. months to 27 years, with an average of 7.4 years.

RESULTS Statistical Results


The incidence of sporadic VS is known to be
Families 1/100,00O/year. Estimating an immediate family
Review of 494 charts of patients with unilateral size to be 20 members, the probability of one family
VS treated at UCSF from 1985 to 1995 identified having two VS present during a 10-year period is
four families who met the inclusionary criteria. Two 1.9/1,000,000. Twenty-four families would be ex-
additional families were referred from the House pected to present with two VS during 10 years.
Ear Institute and three families were identified Given the number of VS during 10 years to be
from ANA newsletter request. Overall, nine families 25,000, the frequency of familial unilateral presen-
were identified with more than one member affected tation by chance alone would be approximately
with a unilateral VS in the absence of diagnostic cri- 1/1000.A review of UCSF charts found four families
teria for NF-2. Pedigrees of these families are shown with familial unilateral VS out of 500 charts of VS
in Figure 1. The affected individuals were parent- patients, for a frequency of 8/1000.
offspring in four families, first cousins in three other If one considers only families with affected
families, siblings in one family and aunt-nephew in first-degree relatives, the probability of genetic
the remaining family. In pedigree 1,the monozygotic transmission is strengthened. When considering
twin of an affected individual had no evidence of VS only first-degree relatives, the average family size
on MRI, suggesting that there is incomplete pene- would be approximately five (compared with 20)
trance of the responsible gene in this family. In ad- and the calculated frequency of familial unilateral
dition, there is evidence for incomplete penetrance presentation by chance alone would be 1/10,000.
in pedigrees 7, 8, and 9 if the VS are inherited in This is much lower than the observed frequency of
these families. 4/500 noted at UCSF.
Table I summarizes the presenting clinical
characteristics of these 18 patients. The average age DISCUSSION
of symptom presentation was 50.3 years (range, 24 Classification of VS traditionally has fallen into
to 67 years). Two individuals were deceased at the two distinct groups: those with sporadic unilateral

Laryngoscope 107: September 1997 Bikhazi et al.: Familial Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma
1177
&
Pedigree I

Pedigree 4
+ Pedigree 2

Pedigree 5
Pedigree 3

Pedigree 6

Fig. 1. Pedigrees of nine families


presenting with more than one uni-
lateral vestibular schwannorna in the
family.

Pedigree 7 Pedigree 8 Pedigree 9

presentation and those associated with NF-2. Subtle within the same family, or 3. an entirely separate
differences in clinical presentation and cytological genetic disorder. Neurofibromatosis type I1 is known
characteristics between these two groups have been to be a clinically heterogeneous disease, and two
described. NF-2-associated VS tend to present at a separate clinical presentations of NF-2, a mild
younger age1 and are of a larger size at clinical pre- (Gardner-Frazier) and a severe (Wishart) form, have
sentation than their sporadic counterparts.9 A ma- been described.13 Mild presentation is typified by
ternal effect, which is defined as the earlier presen- late onset and slow progression of bilateral VS with
tation and more rapid progression of VS in infrequent skin manifestations or other CNS tu-
maternally-inherited cases, has also been noted to mors. Conversely, severe presentation is character-
occur in NF-2.10 Histologically, VS in NF-2 have foci ized by early age of onset, rapid progression, and
of higher cellularity and more lobular growth pat- multiple CNS tumors in addition to bilateral VS. Pa-
terns as compared with their sporadic counter- tients with familial unilateral VS thus may repre-
parts.11 Although the simplicity of this division of sent a less severe expression of NF-2.
VS into sporadic and NF-2-associated is practical, it
is not necessarily all-inclusive. This study presents Clinical characteristics of individuals in this
18 individuals with familial VS who do not meet cri-
study further supports similarities to NF-2. NF-2-
teria for NF-2 diagnosis. A thorough review of the associated VS tend t o present at larger size as com-
medical literature revealed only one other study pared with sporadic VS.9 In agreement with this, a
that has noted the familial presentation of unilat- study of sporadic VS in the MRI era noted only 16%
eral VS in the absence of NF-2.12 In this study of of sporadic VS presented with size greater than 3
clinical and audiological profile of 93 patients with cm.14 In this study, 50% of individuals presented
unilateral VS, Neary et al. found two families with with VS 3 cm or larger. In the largest NF-2 family
more than one member presenting with unilateral known,l5 an earlier age of presentation of VS among
VS in the absence of NF-2. The relationship among successive generations was described.16 In this
the affected members was siblings in one family and study, the average age of symptom onset of first gen-
first cousins in the second family. The authors high- eration and second generation individuals was 57.8
light that NF-2 should be considered in these cases years and 35.5 years, respectively. This result could
of familial unilateral VS but provide no further data be explained either by a similar pathogenesis to NF-
of other possibilities accounting for this phenotype. 2 or by greater awareness leading to earlier diagno-
sis (anticipation bias).
Three possible hypotheses for explaining the fa-
milial occurrence of unilateral VS include the fol- Genetically, it is possible that familial occur-
lowing: 1. a less severe expression of NF-2, 2. a rence of unilateral VS may result from mutations in
chance occurrence of two or more sporadic VS the NF-2 gene that result in less severe NF-2 phe-

Laryngoscope 107: September 1997 Bikhazi et al.: Familial Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma
1178
TABLE I.
Characteristics of PatientsWith Familial Unilateral Vestibular Schwannorna.
~~

Age (Y) Side/Size (cm)


Kindred Sex Relationship Current At Presentation At Surgery of Acoustic Neuroma Presenting Symptoms
1A F Sister 51 46 51 Rll.5 HWTTTN
1B F Sister 46 24 25 R13 HWT/FN
2A M Son 37 37 37 u3 FNIFP
2B F Mother 61 54 59 R11.5 HUlM
3A F Daughter 53 44 44 u3 HA
3B M Father 89x 60 61 u3.5 VT/IM
4A M Son 31 30 30 R13.5 HL (sudden)/TN
46 M Father 62 56 56 u3 HWT/TN
5A F Aunt 70 65 66 u3 HUFN
5B M Nephew 47 33 37 w4 HUlM
6A M Father 71 61 64 Rl1.5 HWT
6B F Daughter 47 31 31 RJ2.5 VT
7A F First cousin 65 49 52 u2 HLNT
78 M First cousin 65x 63 NA u1.5 HL
8A F First cousin 68 64 65 u1 HUIM/TN
88 F First cousin 66 60 62 U1.5 IMTTNJHA
9A F First cousin 68 61 62 Rl2.5 HL (sudden)/lM
$6 F First cousin 72 67 67 RJ3.5 IM
NA = not applicable; HL = hearing loss; VT = vertigo; TN = tinnitus; IM = imbalance: FN = facial numbness; FP = facial paralysis; HA = headache:
x = deceased.

notype. Mutations that involve the NF-2 gene have Our data suggest that the presentation of fa-
been observed in 22% to 59% of patients with spo- milial unilateral VS occurs more frequently than ex-
radic VS as well as a variety of other t~mors.5~17Re- pected by chance alone. A formula for probability
cent genotype-phenotype correlation studies sug- adjusting for combinations was used to estimate the
gest that mutations in the NF-2 gene are associated number of families expected to present with two VS
with variable phenotypic expression. Ruttledge et in one family. The actual frequency of familial uni-
al.l* have found that nonsense and frameshift mu- lateral VS is likely t o be even larger given the poor
tations in the NF-2 gene that result in protein trun- knowledge of family history of most patients and in-
cation are associated with a more severe clinical complete ascertainment. Selection bias may exist
presentation of NF-2 (Wishart), whereas missense within the three sources of patients for this study
mutations that lead to a single amino acid change (UCSF, the House Ear Institute, and the ANAL The
in the protein are associated with milder form of selection bias within this study may include both a
the disease. Their data also show that there is vari- diagnostic bias (a patient with a relative diagnosed
able phenotypic expression within a family (in- with VS is more likely to be diagnosed with VS) and
trafamilial variability): for example, some family a tertiary care referral bias (patients referred to ter-
members have bilateral VS, whereas others may tiary care facilities may not represent the larger
have unilateral VS only even though they all have group of VS patients). The exact impact of these bi-
the same mutation. Similarly, Parry et al.19 re- ases on this small sample of patients cannot be cal-
ported that retinal abnormalities were associated culated.
with the more disruptive nonsense or frameshift Sporadic unilateral VS have not been previ-
mutations in the NF-2 gene; further, their data also ously thought of as a genetically transmissible dis-
demonstrated intrafamilial variability in clinical ease. This study suggests that unilateral VS may be
expression. These two studies support the concept inherited in a small subset of patients. If true, this
that other factors or genes may contribute to or has important implications for genetic counseling of
modify the clinical phenotype of NF-2. Therefore, it patients with unilateral VS. Future genetic analysis
is quite possible that specific mutations in the NF- of these patients and longitudinal follow-up of fam-
2 locus in combination with the patients genetic ily members will clarify the nature of familial uni-
background could lead t o a milder phenotypic ex- lateral presentation of VS. As a preliminary step in
pression and incomplete penetrance seen in our the genetic study of these families and determining
families. the role of NF-2 gene in these VS, the patients tu-

Laryngoscope 107: September 1997 Bikhazi et al.: Familial Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma
1179
mors are being assessed for loss of heterozygosity a t of inactivating mutations in the neurofibromatosis type 2
gene (NF2) in primary malignant mesotheliomas. Proc Nat
the NF-2 locus, and the NF-2 gene is being screened Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:10,854-8.
for possible mutations. 7. Ruttledge MH, Sarrazin J, Rangaratnam S, et al. Evidence
for the complete inactivation of the NF2 gene in the ma-
CONCLUSION jority of sporadic meningiomas. Nut Genet 1994;6:1 8 0 4 .
8. Tos M, Thomsen J. Epidemiology of acoustic neuromas. J
This study reports nine families with a newly Laryngol Otol 1994;8:685-92.
defined phenotype, familial unilateral VS, who 9. Short PM, Martuza RL, Huson SM. Neurofibromatosis 2:
failed to meet current criteria for the diagnosis of clinical features, genetic counselling and management is-
sues, In: Huson SM, Hughes RAC, eds. The Neurofibro-
NF-2. Although age and symptom presentation are matoses: A Pathogenetic and Clinical Overview. London:
similar t o sporadic VS, 50% of individuals presented Chapman and Hall; 1994:41444.
with large tumors (greater than 3 cm). Earlier 10. Fontaine B, Sanson M, Delattre 0, et al. Parental origin of
symptom presentation was observed in succeeding chromosome 22 loss in sporadic NF2 neuromas. Genomics
1991;10:280-3.
generations without any evidence of genomic im- 11. Sobel RA, Wang Y. Vestibular (acoustic) schwannomas: histo-
printing. Familial unilateral VS occurred more com- logic features in neurofibromatosis 2 and in unilateral
monly than would be expected by chance alone. This cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1993;52:106-13.
phenotype may represent a variable expression of 12. Neary WJ, Newton VE,Laoide-Kemp SN, et al. A clinical and
NF-2 or a new genetic disorder. Further genetic audiological study of patients and families with unilateral
vestibular schwannomas. I. Clinical features of neurofibro-
analysis will help to elucidate this entity. matosis in patients with unilateral vestibular schwanno-
mas. J Laryngol Otol 1996;110:63440.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 13. Eldridge R, Parry DM, Kaiser-Kupfer MI. Neurofibromatosis
11: clinical heterogeneity and natural history in 39 individ-
We thank the Acoustic Neuroma Association for uals in 9 families and 16 sporadic cases. Proceedings of the
providing patients for this study. In addition, we Eighth International Congress on Human Genetics. Am J
thank Michael Baser, PhD, and Dilys Parry, PhD, for Hum Genet 1991;49:133.
critical review of the manuscript. 14. Selesnick SH, Jackler RK, Pitts LH. The changing clinical
presentation of acoustic tumors in the MRI era. Laryngo-
BIBLIOGRAPHY scope 1993;103:431-6.
15. Gardner WJ, Frazier CH. Bilateral acoustic neurofibromato-
1. Evans, DGR, Huson SM, Donnai D, et al. A genetic study of sis: a clinical study and field survey of a family of five gen-
type I1 neurofibromatosis in the north west of England erations with bilateral deafness in thirty-eight members.
and the UK. I. Prevalence, mutation rate, fitness, and con- Arch Neurol Psycho1 1930;23:266-302.
firmation of maternal transmission effect on severity. J 16. Young DR, Eldridge R, Gardner WJ. Bilateral acoustic neu-
Med Genet 1992a;29:841-6. roma in a large kindred. JAMA 1970;214:347-53,
2 . Rouleau GA, Wertelecki W, Haines JL, et al. Genetic linkage 17. Irving RM, Moffat DA, Hardy DG, et al. Molecular genetic
of bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis to a DNA marker analysis of the mechanism of tumarigenesis in acoustic
on chromosome 22. Nature 1987;329:246-8. neuroma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:
3. Trofatter JA, MacCollin MM, Rutter JL, et al. A novel 1222-8.
moesin-, ezrin-, radixin-like gene is a candidate for the 18. Ruttledge MH, Andermann AA,Phelan CM, et al. Type of mu-
neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor. Cell 1993;72: tation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 gene (NF2) fre-
791-800. quently determines severity of disease. A m J Hum Genet
4. Seizinger BR, Martuza RL, Gusella JF. Loss of genes on chro- 1996;59:331-42.
mosome 22 in tumorigenesis of human acoustic neuroma. 19. Parry DM, MacCollin MM, Kaiser-Kupfer MI, et al. Germ-
Nature 1986;322:644-7. line mutations in the neurofibromatosis 2 gene: correla-
5. Wolff RK, Frazer KA, Jackler RK, et al. Analysis of chromo- tions with disease severity and retinal abnormalities. A m
8ome 22 deletions in neurofibromatosis type 2-related tu- J Hum Gene. 1996;59:529-39.
mors. Am J Hum Genet 1992;51:478-85. 20. Evans DGR, Huson SM, Neary W, et al. A clinical study of
6. Bianchi AB, Mitsunaga SI, Cheng JQ, et al. High frequency type 2 neurofibromatosis. Quart J Med 1992b;304:603-18.

Laryngoscope 107: September 1997 Bikhazi et al.: Familial Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma
1180

Anda mungkin juga menyukai