Anda di halaman 1dari 4

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 5 (2016) pp 3390-3393

Research India Publications.

Fatigue Analysis of Dissimilar Materials Welded Specimen Using Finite

Element Analysis

Shrestha Ranjit
Division of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, Kongju National University,
1223-24 Cheonan-daero, Sebuk-gu, Cheonan, South Korea.

Wontae Kim
Division of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, Kongju National University,
1223-24 Cheonan-daero, Sebuk-gu, Cheonan, South Korea.

Kooahn Kwon*
Center for Safety Measurement, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS),
267 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea.

Abstract factors such as magnitude and frequency of the loads causing

This study presents fatigue analysis of a 3-D model of weld the fluctuating stress, temperature, environment, geometrical
structure using ANSYS 15 FE Software. The study was carried complexities, material imperfections and discontinuities [6].
on welding of two dissimilar materials in which SA106 and Fatigue failures can be very expensive since they generally
STS 304 are parent materials and M 309 is used as a filler occur without warning and are often quite serious with large
material. Butt welded joint specimen using gas metal arc damage to associated equipment. Therefore, it is very important
welding (GMAW) process was analyzed to cyclic loading. The to predict an accurate fatigue life considering factors such as
specimen was modeled in ANSYS 15 Workbench. At first weld quality, geometry, surface finish, and load conditions [7-
thermal analysis is done by giving a heat input which is 8].
equivalent to the heat generated by a GMAW welding process. Many methods are available to predict the fatigue life of welded
In the next step, a structural analysis was carried out to obtain components. Three common approaches exist for the fatigue
the mechanical response of the structural model, where the strength assessment of welded joints, which can be
temperature history obtained from the first step was employed distinguished by the parameters according to nominal stress,
as a thermal load in the analysis. Then on the same specimen, hot-spot stress, and notch stress [9-10]. As the finite element
fatigue analysis is conducted by applying cyclic loading. method (FEA) has become the favorite tool in structural
analysis, there is an unquestionable need for a direct connection
Keywords: Welded Structures, Fatigue Life, Finite Element of the fatigue assessment approaches to the simulations. FEA
Analysis, ANSYS is a modeling tool used to accurately calculate stresses,
deflection, natural frequencies and dynamic response of
mechanical systems [11-12].
Introduction This study presents a methodology developed to evaluate the
Many metallic structures in the industry are assembled through fatigue life of GMAW welded dissimilar material welded
some kind of welding process which is composed of heating, specimen under cyclic loading. Static and dynamic stresses are
melting and solidification using a heat source such as arc, laser, presented on a Modified Goodman Diagram since this is
torch or electron beam [1]. Design engineers are increasingly commonly recognized as a very easy and effective way to
faced with the need to join dissimilar materials as they are assess the stress amplitudes. Known material properties are
seeking creative new structures. Increased use of these used to quantify the fatigue safety margin using either a
materials for engineering applications is growing because of proportional increase method or other assessment of design
special performance requirements for corrosion resistance, high safety margin. This methodology will permit, in further studies,
strength-to-weight ratio, erosion resistance, or high- the modeling of both stresses, in-service and residual stresses,
temperature strength [2]. Welded structures are exposed to acting together, which seem like an advantage to engineers and
fatigue loading due to their operating and loading conditions. researchers who work in design and evaluation of structural
But research shows that even though they provide good components against fatigue failures.
strength in tension, they fail much quicker when subjected to
fatigue loading. This may be due to various reasons like
improper welding sequence, improper welding parameters or Numerical FEM Approach
improper preparation of the joint materials. The fatigue life Model Configuration
may also get reduced due to a combination of static and The gas metal arc welding (GMAW) is modeled in the present
dynamic stresses that in combination exceed the capability of welding simulation. Fig. 1 shows the welding configuration and
the material [3-5]. Fatigue failure is a complex and progressive geometry of the specimen under consideration. As shown in the
form of local damage which is significantly influenced by many figure, the moving torch is applied on the longitudinal upper

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 5 (2016) pp 3390-3393
Research India Publications.

edge of the plate of 100 mm long, 14.5 mm wide and 2.9 mm Table 1 Properties of the materials
thick. The plate is simply supported at both ends. For the
fatigue analysis, a crack in the middle of the specimen is SN Properties Unit Materials
modeled. The Fig.2 shows the details of the crack. During M309 SA106 STS 304
meshing, physical preference was taken as mechanical, the 1 Density Kgm-3 7850 7750 7900
relative center was kept in medium mode and curvature was off 2 Coefficient of thermal m/m/C 12 11.5 9.4
in advanced size function. The resultant mesh had 47,663 expansion
elements and 9,471 nodes. The finite element model of the 3 Isotropic Elasticity
3.1 Young Modulus GPa 200 207 190
specimen with meshing is shown in Fig.3.
3.2 Poissons ratio - 0.3 0.3 0.29
4 Bilinear Isotropic Hardening
4.1 Yield Strength Mpa 215 295 276
4.2 Tangent Modulus Mpa 1075 1315 1380
5 Alternating Stress Mean Stress
5.1 1E1 3999 38600 13600
5.2 1E2 1413 12100 5560
5.3 1E3 789 3960 2370
5.4 1E4 Mpa 262 1420 1080
5.5 1E5 138 584 534
5.6 1E6 86 286 293
5.7 1E7 - 164 177
Figure 1: Geometry of the welding specimen 6 Strain-Life Parameters
6.1 Display Curve Type - Strain- Strain- Strain-
Life Life Life
6.2 Strength Coefficient Mpa 920 1254 1267
6.3 Strength exponent - -0.106 -0.15 -0.139
6.4 Ductility Coefficient - 0.213 0.6 0.174
6.5 Ductility Exponent - -0.47 -0.52 -0.415
6.6 Cyclic Strength Mpa 1000 1254 2245
6.7 Cyclic Strain hardening - 0.2 0.28 -0.334
7 Tensile Ultimate Strength Mpa 520 547 572
8 Isotropic Thermal Wm-1C-1 16.2 60.4 16.2
9 Specific Heat J/kg-K 500 469 500

Figure 2: Crack details of the specimen

Boundary Conditions
Thermal Boundary
A thermal analysis of heat conduction was carried out in the
first step to obtain temperature distribution histories over the
structural model. In the thermal analysis, the welding heat
input, Q was calculated by using Eq. (1).
Q = A ( ) (1)
where A is welding efficiency; V is welding arc voltage; I is
welding current; V is welding arc voltage; Ws is the arc welding
speed; and Q is the heat input.
The arc efficiency, A for GMAW was assumed to be 0.80.
Also, the values of convective heat transfer coefficient, hf was
Figure 3: Finite element model of a specimen taken as stagnant air-simplified case and reference temperature
was taken 22C. The parameters used for giving heat input are
selected from the recommended values of current and voltage
Materials Properties for the particular thickness of weld where the voltage equals to
In this study, welding of two dissimilar materials was carried 22.73 V, current is equal to 277 Amp and welding speed is 5
out in which SA106 and STS 304 are parent materials and M mm/sec.
309 is used as a filler material. The material properties of SA
106, STS 304 and M309 vary according to the temperature Structural Boundary
history. Table.1 shows the details of the properties of the In the next step, a structural analysis was carried out to obtain
materials considered in this study. the mechanical response of the structural model, where the
temperature history obtained from the first step was employed
as a thermal load in the analysis. The material model of elastic-

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 5 (2016) pp 3390-3393
Research India Publications.

plastic based on the Von Mises yield criterion and isotropic

strain hardening rule was chosen, in which its response over the
history was determined by the temperature-dependent material
properties inputted. The boundary condition or constraint on
the structural model needs also to be assigned accordingly.

Fatigue Loading
Fatigue analysis is conducted by applying cyclic loading.
During the fatigue analysis, Fatigue strength factor (kf) was
kept 1, loading type is ratio and equals to 0.1 with scale factor
Figure 6: Temperature distribution profile at time = 1 second
1, and analysis type is stress life with Goodman mean stress
theory with equivalent (Von Mises) stress component. The
Following this, thermal loading was import to setup structural
detail of fatigue loading condition is shown in Fig.4.
analysis which results in deformation and stress developed in
The fatigue analysis was done for 1800 s in which the specimen
the specimen. The Fig. 7 shows the deformation profile with
was subjected to 924 N for the first 300 s; 1848 N from 300 s
respect to time and Fig. 8 show the details of total deformation
to 600 s; 2772 N from 600 to 900 s; 3696 N from 900 s to 1200
obtained at the end of analysis.
s; 4620 N from 1200 to 1500 s and finally 5544 N from 1500 s
to 1800 s. The magnitude of the load for the fatigue analysis is
given by,
Load = (1 + sin(2ft)) (2)
where, F= load at offset yield, f=frequency, t=time.

Figure 7: Deformation with respect to time

Figure 4: Nature of fatigue loading with respect to time

Results & Discussion

Thermal analysis was done to determine the thermal state in the
weld and surrounding components. The Fig. 5 shows the details
of maximum and minimum temperature of the specimen Figure 8: Total deformation at time = 1800 s
recorded for 1 hour. The Fig. 6 shows the simulation results of
the thermal analysis at time 1 second which shows that The Fig. 9 shows the maximum and minimum equivalent stress
temperature exceeds well above the melting temperature of the profile with respect to time and Fig. 10 show the details of
substrate material in the welding region. equivalent stress developed at the end of analysis. The stress
distribution patterns in the specimen showed that it tended to
concentrate at or near points of application of thermal load,
stress field is generally not uniform in these areas. Stress was
concentrated at corners, edges, and other areas of abrupt change
in the shape of the specimen and was not uniform where the
cross-section of the structure changed suddenly and had large
gradients at localized points. For the measurement of stress
distribution pattern at different location, measurement profile
1-2 (0, 0, 0) & (100, 0, 0) was created in X-axis (as shown in
Fig. 10). The Fig. 11 shows the measurement of the Equivalent
stress along the profile.
The fatigue analysis of the specimen is analyzed for fatigue life.
The Fig.12 shows the maximum and minimum life of the
Figure 5: Temperature Profile of the specimen with respect to specimen determined in the simulation. The maximum life was
time found to be 1E7 cycles whereas the minimum life was found to
be 2.53E5.

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 5 (2016) pp 3390-3393
Research India Publications.

project reliability. Good estimation is expected if we have good

input data (material properties, geometry, and loading).

This research was supported by the Radiation Technology
Development program of the National Research Foundation of
Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future
Planning (NRF-2015M2A2A9064147) and National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea
government (MEST) (NRF-2014R1A1A2054595).
Figure 9: Equivalent (Von-Mises) Stress with respect to time


[1] R. Shrestha, W. Kim, H. Park, and J. Park, "Numerical

Simulation of Similar and Dissimilar Materials
Welding Process; Quantifications of Temperature,
Stress, Strain and Deformation," International Journal
of Engineering Technology, vol. 5, pp. 12, (2014).
[2] R. Tenaglia, Dissimilar Materials Joining, EWI
Home (2012).
Figure 10: Equivalent (Von-Mises) Stressat time = 1800 s
[3] D. Oh, J. Lee, and M. Kim, "Fatigue strength
assessment of Invar alloy weld joints using the notch
stress approach," Engineering Failure Analysis, vol.
42, pp. 87-99, (2014).
[4] W. Fricke, "Fatigue analysis of welded joints: state of
development," Marine Structures, vol. 16, no. 3, pp.
185-200, (2003).
[5] J. Schijve, "Fatigue of structures and materials in the
20th century and the state of the art," International
Journal of Fatigue, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 679-702, (2003).
[6] M. Aygl, "Fatigue analysis of welded structures
using the finite element method, (2012).
[7] J. Kim, G. Zi, S. Van, M. Jeong, J. Kong, and M. Kim,
Figure 11: Equivalent (Von-Mises) Stress along "Fatigue life prediction of multiple site damage based
the profile 1-2 on probabilistic equivalent initial flaw model,"
Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 38, no. 4,
pp. 443, (2011).
[8] I. Sohn and D. Bae, "A study on the Fatigue Life
Prediction Method of the Spot-welded Lap Joint,"
Transactions of KSAE, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 110-118,
[9] K. C. Goes, A. F. Camaro, and G. F. Batalha,
"Multiaxial fatigue of welded jointsa method for
fatigue life prediction," 20th International Congress of
Mechanical Engineering, (2009).
[10] Z. Barsoum and I. Barsoum, "Residual stress effects
on fatigue life of welded structures using LEFM,"
Figure 12: Estimated Fatigue Life Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 449-
467, (2009).
[11] T. Marin and G. Nicoletto, "Fatigue design of welded
joints using the finite element method and the 2007
ASME Div. 2 Master curve," FratturaedIntegrita
The objective of this study is to present a practical methodology
Strutturale, no. 9, pp. 76, (2009).
developed to evaluate the fatigue life of welded specimen under
[12] F. He and C. M. Tan, "Monte Carlo Simulation of
cyclic loading. Fatigue analysis was conducted in a virtual
Fatigue Crack Initiation at Elevated Temperature,"
environment using ANSYS. The model presents a good
representation of failure and load correlation. Integrating
fatigue analysis and finite elements, it is possible to analyze
several types of specimen configurations in the design phase,
providing development time and cost reduction, increasing the