Legal Writing
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
OF
EFFECTIVE WRITING
Submitted by:
Gerald C. Castaeda
JD 102
Submitted to:
1. The Government may call upon the people to defend the State
and, in the fulfillment thereof, all citizens may be required, under
conditions provided by law, to render personal military or civil
service.
1. To defend the State, the Government may call upon all citizens, who
may be required, under conditions provided by law, to render
personal military or civil service.
The President may approve a bill. He should then sign it. On the other
hand, he may veto it. In that case, he should return it with the objections to
the house where it originated.
2. An almost identical error is the comma splice. In this case a comma splices
the disconnected ideas:
The accused was defended by a new lawyer, he had not handled
any case up to that time.
WRONG: The mango trees were growing fast and she had
bought the young plants from the San Andres
nursery.
BETTER: The mango trees were growing fast. She recalled that
she had bought the seedlings from the San Andres
nursery.
Reference:
3. Sentence elements (subject, verb, direct object, etc.) are placed as close to
each other as possible. For example, adverbs like merely, nearly, exactly,
quite, only, just, scarcely and almost, will cause misunderstanding and even
a lawsuit when they are not placed next to the words they modify.
The papers carry a story that the President of the World Bank has
found improvement in the economic condition of the Philippines.
5. Definitions should be made using words of the same part of speech as the
word being defined.
6. When conjunctions join words, the latter should be of the same part of
speech or of the same rank or structure.
The phrase is clear and correct. She bought rice and what she
needed
for one week.
Ants were found under the He visited her upon his return and
table and on the desk. bringing expensive gifts.
The change or shift in the first sentence above is from the third
person (The 1987 Constitution) to the second person (you). Shifts from the
second to the first, from the third to the first or from any other grammatical
person to another, results in a similar violation of the principle of coherence.
However, shifts that are necessary because they are required by a given
situation, preserved rather than violate the principle of coherence.
4. By inverting the sentence order. The usual order of the sentence is subject-
verb-direct object, these being the principal parts. A disruption of this order
arrests the attention of the reader. Thus,
A man killed he in the heat of a long argument calls immediate
attention to man while
In the heat of a long argument, he killed a man.