0 Suka0 Tidak suka

16 tayangan25 halamanFeb 21, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

© All Rights Reserved

16 tayangan

© All Rights Reserved

- Fire Sprinklers
- Hydraulics(Rough Boundary)
- NIKURADSE(1933)translated NASA.pdf
- Engineer.essay
- Turbulence Physics and Modeling Lectures
- Flushing System Tips
- Thermal Power Engineering Syllabus
- Space & Time
- Convective Mass Transfer
- PDF (Published Version)
- 18
- ATOMIZAÇÃO_phd1
- EAMCET_PB_Physics_Jr Inter Physics_01_01UNITS AND DIMENSIONS.pdf
- Cur Geri
- Ultrasonic Gas Flow Meter Basics
- Chap8.pdf
- Mud Report 1
- Principles of fluid mechanics
- lec16
- JNNFM Momentum Transfer

Anda di halaman 1dari 25

Chapter 4

Mean velocity and flow resistance

The Chezy and Darcy-Weisbach relations

The Manning equation

Sources of flow resistance

Estimating Mannings n

Here in Chapter 4 we begin to explore some of the ways in which river scientists have

found it useful to deal with the reality that water does not move as an ideal frictionless

fluid. Real flows resist motion in various ways and in doing so they consume energy

and do work. Again, it will be useful at the outset to take a simple approach to

understanding these resisting forces and we will here consider only the mean flow

properties. Variations in the forces acting within the flow is a topic we will put off until

later in Chapter 5.

Water is impelled downstream by the force of gravity acting against the opposing

frictional force or shear stress exerted against it by the boundary. If the flow is uniform,

velocity does not change downstream and one may conclude from Newton's first law of

motion (a body will continue to move with constant velocity in a straight line unless

acted on by some net force) that the impelling and resisting forces must be in balance.

These conditions allow a formulation of the boundary shear stress, o (the subscript o

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

denotes 'at the boundary'). The relevant forces are (see Figure 4.1 for further definition

of terms):

L

v L

v

A Ws

bed

p

Ws = W sine

profile W

Ws = W sine = gAL sine ...............................................(4.1)

Fo = o PL ......................................................(4.2)

If Ws = Fo, gAL sine = o PL ...................................................(4.3)

A

or o = g P sine ................................................(4.4)

The ratio A/P is known as the hydraulic radius, Rh (m). Making this substitution in

equation (4.4), and noting that sine = tan = slope, s, for small values of (< 5o),

and that g = , we can write:

o = Rhs ds ..............................................(4.5)

Equation (4.5) defines the mean boundary shear stress and often is simply referred to as

the 'depth-slope product' because it turns out that this expression can be simplified

further in application because the hydraulic radius normally is approximated by the

mean depth (d) of the channel in most rivers (see Sample Problem 4.1).

4.2

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Sample Problem 4.1: A 2.00 m-deep uniform flow discharges through a 100.00 m-wide rectangular

channel at a slope of 0.001 (1.000 m drop for every horizontal km). If the water temperature is 10oC,

calculate the mean shear stress (a) based on the hydraulic radius, and (b) based on the mean flow

depth.

A 2.00 x 100.00

Solution: (a) In this rectangular channel, Rh = = = 1.92 m. Figure 2.1 indicates

p (2.00 +100.00 + 2.00)

that the specific weight of water at 10oC is 9.804 Nm-3; substituting the appropriate values in equation

(4.5) yields: o = Rhs = 9804 x 1.92 x 0.001 = 18.8 = 19 Nm-2.

(b) The corresponding calculation using the mean depth y rather than Rh, yields:

Although it is useful to consider this classical derivation of boundary shear stress as the

downstream component of the weight of the water body within the channel, we should

note also that equation (4.5) can simply be regarded as a special case of the momentum

equation. Where flow is steady and uniform (y1 = y2 and v1 = v2), equation (3.7) reduces

to:

Vosin - oAb = 0

Vo

so that o = sin = Rhsin, or for low slopes where sin = tan = s, o = Rhs.

Ab

It is important to remember that o in equation (4.5) is a measure of the mean boundary

shear stress for a channel cross section and that it tells us nothing about the variation of

shear stress within the section. Furthermore we must not forget that equation (4.5) is

strictly valid only for uniform flow. Now as it turns out, this assumption can be relaxed to

some extent because o also applies reasonably well to gradually varied flow in which,

at least for short reaches of channel, the flow approximates uniform conditions.

Nevertheless, the further the streamlines diverge from uniform flow conditions, the

greater the error in equation (4.5).

4.3

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Given a certain impelling force (shear stress) in a flow, the equilibrated mean velocity

will depend on the level of resistance to flow encountered as the water moves through

the channel. High levels of resistance mean that large amounts of energy are being bled

from the flow system leaving less to maintain motion; thus, velocity will be relatively low.

Similarly, low resistance means that only a small amount of the total energy is being

consumed per unit channel length and the larger available energy balance means that

velocity will be correspondingly higher. Although the general concept of energy

conservation and loss is a straightforward notion, the particular mechanisms of loss -

flow resistance - are quite complex.

Defining flow resistance, the relationship between the mean shear stress and the mean

flow velocity in rivers, has been a central problem in river studies for a very long time,

but it continues to defy a complete analytical solution. The French engineer A. de

Chezy perhaps was the first (in 1775) to address this problem for uniform flow

conditions and he reasoned on the basis of common observation that:

o = kv2 ..........................................................................(4.6)

general the boundary shear stress must depend on the fluid mass transport rate so a

more complete version of equation (4.6) might be written:

o = av2 ........................................................................(4.7)

where a may be any other dimensionless property of the fluid or the boundary (o/v2 is

conveniently dimensionless). Actually, regardless of whether shear stress is assumed

to be a function of velocity, or of velocity and water density (or specific weight of water),

dimensional analysis (see Chapter 1) inevitably leads us to the conclusion that o v2.

Later we will see that the variable a in equation (4.7) is a dimensionless number (not

4.4

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Reynolds number, and on the cross-sectional shape of the channel.

g

from which it follows that v= aRhs (noting again that =g) ....(4.9)

Replacing the radical g/a by one constant, C, in equation (4.9) we have the formula

v = C Rhs ....................................................................(4.10)

which is known as the Chezy equation after its originator. Chezy C is a measure of flow

efficiency or conductance; as C increases for a given depth-slope product (shear stress)

so does the velocity. In other words, Chezy C is inversely related to the resistance to

flow. Evaluating Chezy C for natural channels has been a major engineering and

scientific enterprise during the last two centuries.

Many of our ideas about flow resistance in open channels were developed directly from,

or in parallel with, studies of flow through pipes. By the mid-19th century several

experimentalists, including d'Aubuisson (1840), Weisbach (1845), and Darcy (1854),

had showed that, in a run of cylindrical pipe, head loss (H) varies directly with the

velocity head (v2/2g) and pipe length (L), and inversely with pipe diameter (D). They

proposed empirical head-loss equations of the form:

L v2

H = D 2g ...............................................................(4.11)

commonly, the Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient. Equation (4.11) now called the

Darcy pipe flow equation, is essentially similar to the Chezy equation for open channel

flow.

4.5

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

recognizing that H/L is equivalent to the water-surface slope (s) and that D can be

converted to an equivalent depth through the hydraulic radius. For a circular pipe of

(D/2)2

diameter D, Rh = A/P = D = D/4 so that D = 4Rh. Rearranging equation (4.11)

H 2g 8gRhs

=D L = ..........................................(4.12)

v2 v2

The general structure of equation (4.12) and its similarity to the Chezy equation, perhaps

becomes more apparent if it is written in the form:

8gRhs 8gRhs 8g

v2 = or v = or v= Rhs ...............(4.13)

8g

From equation (4.13) it now is clearly apparent that C = ..............................(4.14)

Of course, both the Chezy and Darcy-Weisbach equations can also be written in terms

of shear stress, giving:

v2 v2

C2 = g o or C= g o .........................................(4.15)

8 o

and = 2 ....................................................................................(4.16)

v

velocity in the sense of a time rate of displacement but it does have the dimensions of

velocity (LT-1, ms-1) and is a very useful term in dimensional analysis. We will have

considerably more use for this term later when we consider the nature of velocity

distributions. Meanwhile, we can rewrite equation (4.16) in terms of the shear velocity to

8

give: = 2 (v*)2

v

4.6

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

v 8

and by taking roots, v* = ............................................................(4.17)

If it is assumed that shear stress (o) at a pipe wall is a function only of the following

variables, o = f(v, D, , , k), dimensional analysis suggests the dependency

where k is the representative height of the roughness elements on the pipe wall and D/k

therefore is an inverse measure of relative roughness ('relative smoothness').

The term Re in equation (4.18), known as the Reynolds number, is a dimensionless ratio

which expresses the relative importance of inertial and viscous forces in the flow:

inertial forces vL

Re = viscous forces =

It is a subject to which we will return and consider more fully in Chapter 5 but for now we

must at least consider the nature of the conceptual basis of the Reynolds number

because it bears directly on the present discussion.

constraints: laminar and turbulent flow. In laminar flow water is thought to move as a

stack of individual laminae of fluid in which vertical mixing of fluid among laminae is

prevented by the forces of viscosity. As we noted in Chapter 2, viscosity is the internal

molecular property of fluids which constrains the rate at which they deform (flow) when

subjected to some stress. Laminar flow can only occur, however, if the viscous forces

are large compared with the inertial forces represented by flow velocity and some

characteristic length specifying the scale of the flow. In other words, laminar flow is the

domain of relatively low Reynolds number. In cases of flow where the inertial forces

become large with respect to the viscous forces, the viscosity is no longer the property

which limits the rate of fluid deformation and the nature of flow is considered to be quite

different. In this turbulent flow domain, fluid motion no longer occurs in distinct laminae

4.7

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

without mixing but rather is a much more chaotic motion in which water particles break

the bounds of viscosity and move significant vertical distances in the flow. In this flow

dominated by chaotic motion, called turbulent flow, , turbulence itself is the

characteristic that limits the rate of fluid deformation. In other words, turbulent flow is

the domain of relatively high Reynolds number. As you might imagine, the resistance to

flow encountered by water moving though a pipe or channel is not independent of the

type of motion, laminar or turbulent, exhibited by the flow.

The measured dependence of on the character of pipe flow was established in several

classical experiments conducted during the first few decades of this century, notably by

Stanton (1914), Nikuradse (1932-35), and Colebrook and White (1937-39); some of

these early observations are reviewed in A.S.C.E. (1963). These studies confirm the

validity of equation (4.12); typical results are summarized in the Stanton diagram shown

in Figure 4.2.

The Stanton diagram shows measured values of plotted against Reynolds number for

a wide range of pipe roughness. The data show that, in laminar flow (where Re<2000),

the resistance to flow is entirely dependent on Re and is quite independent of the

relative roughness. That is, resistance is a single-valued function of Reynolds number

[equation (4.19): = 64/Re] regardless of the pipe roughness. Beyond a narrow

transition zone (Re = 2000-3000), however, the flow becomes fully turbulent and

resistance to flow becomes independent of Re ( versus Re is a horizontal plot for given

roughness) and entirely dependent on D/k. In this fully turbulent domain, resistance to

flow is described by

1/ f = 1.14 + 2.0 log (D/k) ..................................(4.20)

The key to interpreting the behaviour of in Figure 4.2 is the relationship between the

roughness element height and

the thickness of the viscosity-dominated flow. In laminar

flow all the roughness elements are enclosed in viscous fluid in which there is no lateral

mixing. In consequence, the roughness geometry has no influence on the flow and

4.8

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

laminar flow is thought to persist in a very thin film or viscous sublayer next to the pipe

wall which becomes even thinner as Reynolds number increases. In cases where the

roughness elements are relatively large and protrude through the surface of the viscous

sublayer, they exert a profound influence on the entire flow to the extent that

resistance is dependent only on the relative roughness. Here the flow encounters

hydrodynamically rough boundaries. The lower envelope of the family of resistance

curves in the fully turbulent domain of figure 4.2 represents a convergence

corresponding to hydrodynamically smooth boundaries in which the roughness

elements are fully enclosed by the viscous sublayer. Here the effects of wall roughness

are isolated from the main flow and the dependency on Reynolds number is once again

apparent.

0.10

0.07

relative roughness

Resistance coefficient,

30.0

0.05

61.0

increasing

0.04

120

0.03 252

504

0.02 1014

roughness elements

D

laminar flow turbulent flow

0.01

1 000 10 000 100 000 1 000 000

Reynold s number, Re k

Figure 4.2: The Stanton diagram showing = (Re , D/k); after Rouse (1946).

4.9

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Rivers move through channels as fully turbulent flow over hydrodynamically rough

boundaries and resistance to flow appears to be determined largely by relative

roughness of the boundary. Nevertheless, the viscous sublayer may be important for

certain processes operating in the vicinity of the bed and we will have to revisit this

notion later when we consider the distribution of velocity close to the boundary.

Graphs similar to those in Figure 4.2 can be derived for Chezy C (called Moody

diagrams) using the transform of equation (4.9) although to my knowledge no primary

data have ever been collected for the purpose of an independent characterization so

obviously they show the same results with the same interpretation.

The most well known and widely applied assessment of Chezy C was provided in 1891

by the Irish engineer, R. Manning. He used experimental data from his own studies

and from the results of others to derive the empirical relationship:

kRh1/6

C= n ................................................................(4.21)

where n is a measure of channel roughness and k = 1.49 (for Imperial units) or 1.0 (for

SI units). Combining equations (4.10) and (4.21) yields the Chezy-Manning equation (or

simply, the Manning equation as it is now known), the SI-unit version of which states

that:

Rh2/3s1/2

v= n ............................................................(4.22)

Rh2/3s1/2 Rh2/3s1/2

Q =A n = wd n ...................................(4.23)

where A, w, and d, are respectively cross-sectional area, width, and mean depth, of the

channel.

4.10

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Equations (4.22) and (4.23) are widely used today by river engineers to predict the mean

velocity and discharge through open channels from measured values of hydraulic

radius (or mean depth in wide channels), channel width, and water-surface slope, and

an estimate of the roughness coefficient, n. Manning's n computed from measured

velocities typically varies between 0.01 and 0.10 in natural channels. Sample Problem

4.2 illustrates a typical application of the Manning equation.

Problem: An open channel of rectangular section 20 m wide has a slope of 0.0001. Calculate the depth

of uniform flow and the mean velocity in this channel if the discharge is 100 m3s-1.

Rh2/3s1/2 Rh2/3(0.0001)1/2

Solution: From equation (3.88), Q = wd or 100 = 20d or 8.5 = dRh2/3

n 0.017

A 20d 20d 2/3

Since Rh = = , substituting for Rh yields 8.5 = d . Raising both sides of

P 2d+20 2d+20

the

20d

equation by the power 3/2 yields: 24.782 = d3/2 or 49.563d + 495.631 = 20d5/2. Solving by

2d+20

iteration yields d = 4.15 m. From continuity, v = 100/(20 x 4.15) = 1.21 ms-1. Note that this problem is

algebraically much simpler if Rh can be approximated by the mean depth, d.

Obviously the error in predicting the mean velocity from equation (4.22) is directly

proportional to the error in estimating Manning's n. For example, if the true value of n is

0.04 and was erroneously judged to be 0.03, the velocity and discharge would be

overestimated by 25 per cent. It is not surprising, therefore, that considerable attention

has been given to the problem of estimating accurately the magnitude of n in natural

channels. Before we examine some of these estimating procedures, however, we

should note two important properties of Manning's n and consider the factors which

contribute to most of its variation in natural channels.

First, equation (4.22) is not a dimensionally balanced physical statement and it can be

shown readily that n is not simply a length. From equation (4.14) we know that C

4.11

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

1 k Rh1/6

= .....................................................(4.24)

f 8g n

Since is dimensionless and n is dependent only on roughness, the factor k must have

the dimensions of g . Furthermore, since Rh is a length, n must have the dimensions

equation (4.19). So equation (4.22) is not a 'rational' or physically deduced relationship

but rather an empirical relationship in which n is thought to express resistance to flow

related to 'roughness' of the boundary.

Second, when evaluating n by measurement (of Rh, s, and v), Manning's n simply

becomes a coefficient of proportionality which reflects all sources of flow resistance, not

just that related to boundary roughness. Consequently, two channels with identical

boundary materials may have quite different values of Manning's n if they differ

markedly with respect to other sources of flow resistance.

1. Boundary roughness

2. Stage and discharge

3. Vegetation

4. Obstructions

5. Channel irregularity and alignment

6. Sediment load

Boundary roughness actually is a rather more difficult concept to define than you might

imagine. Although conventionally it is defined operationally as a roughness length (see

Figure 4.2) 'roughness' also depends on the spacing and shape of the roughness

elements. Widely spaced elements produce less roughness than those more closely

spaced, at least up to a certain close packing. If elements are shaped to allow close

4.12

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

fitting, their spacing can be reduced to zero (all elements touch adjacent elements) and

boundary roughness will decline.

grains, roughness is taken as the mean grain size or as some fixed percentile of the

grain-size distribution. It has been shown (for example, see Wolman, 1955, Leopold,

Wolman and Miller, 1964 and Limerinos, 1970) that the relationship between flow

resistance and boundary roughness in open channels essentially is similar to the

uniformly distributed skin resistance for turbulent flow through rough pipes described in

Figure 4.2 and by equation (4.20):

where D84 refers to the 84th percentile of the grain-size distribution measured in the

same units as the depth, y.

But equation (4.25) applies only to a regular and smooth boundary in which grain

roughness is the only source of skin or boundary resistance. The boundaries of rivers

invariably have other scales of roughness expressed on them and these constitute

additional 'roughness'. For example, sediment transport creates bedforms such as

ripples, dunes, and various kinds of bars, and these may be even more important than

grain size in controlling flow velocity (see Einstein and Barbarossa, 1952 and Simons

and Richardson, 1966). Generally, the larger and more closely spaced the bedforms,

the greater the skin resistance and the magnitude of Manning's friction factor.

It is important not to think of boundary roughness as simply a local effect at the channel

perimeter. Turbulence and macroturbulence generated along the rough boundary is

transmitted throughout the entire flow. The rougher the boundary the greater the flow

disturbance there and the greater the intensity of turbulence (and flow resistance)

experienced by the entire flow.

equation (4.25). As relative smoothness y/D84 increases, the Darcy-Weisbach

resistance coefficient declines. In other words, flow resistance obviously is stage

4.13

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Manning's n will decline as discharge and stage increases, a deduction that is widely

supported by observation. At low flows the larger roughness elements which are

'drowned out' at high discharges become increasingly more important contributors to

flow resistance and may even contribute differently in kind by deflecting the mean flow

lines and causing other additional resistance effects (see below under Obstructions).

Another factor which usually tends to reinforce the inverse relation between flow

resistance and stage is the typical difference between the roughness of the bed and

banks. Generally the banks are relatively smooth, often consisting of finer cohesive

material which presents smooth near-vertical faces to the flow. Therefore, the average

boundary roughness of the wetted perimeter of the channel declines as stage

increases. We also need to make a cautionary note here, however, because we can all

conceive of particular cases where the banks are actually rougher than the bed of the

channel. In such cases these two effects - drowning of bed roughness and

encountering greater bank roughness - will be opposed and the net effect on Manning's

n clearly will depend on the relative importance of each factor.

to about bankfull level. Discharges beyond bankfull flow will spread out over the flood

plain of the river and the flow will encounter much greater relative roughness, resulting

in an overall increase in flow resistance.

Vegetation plays an important but complex role in controlling flow resistance in open

channels (Hickin, 1984). Vegetation commonly grows on the banks of rivers so it is an

important element of bank roughness. Although isolated trees and short grasses may

offer little resistance to flow, dense growths of bushes and vines may represent an

important example of the effects referred to in the cautionary note above.

Within-channel vegetation such as weeds and lilies may be important sources of flow

resistance in some low-velocity streams. The direct effect of vegetation as roughness

often is enhanced by the trapping of other organic debris being transported by the flow.

Here it may be useful to distinguish between this type of small organic debris and the

4.14

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

effects of treefall and logs incorporated into the channel. The latter class of vegetative

material, termed large organic debris, will be considered below as an Obstruction.

the physical structure of the plants involved. In the typical case, as stage increases,

flow resistance attributable to vegetation declines because many plants (such as young

willow and alder, for example) are flattened as they are submerged. Thus, at high flows

they present a much more streamlined shape to the flow than they do at low flows.

Certain other plants (such as blackberry bushes and cottonwood saplings), are not so

pliable and their form remains a source of great flow resistance as discharge increases.

conclude that, as the density and size of boundary vegetation increases in river

channels, so will Manning's n and flow resistance increase. Nevertheless, it must be

acknowledged that very little systematic study of the relation between flow resistance

(or Manning's n) and the character of riparian vegetation has been undertaken.

Obstructions in a river channel include fallen trees, log jams, large boulders, slumped

banks, bridge piers, and the like. All such occurrences contribute to increases in flow

resistance and the magnitude of Manning's n. The degree of increase clearly will

depend on the nature of the obstructions, their size, shape, number, and distribution

within the channel.

Large obstructions may result in the local acceleration of flow into the supercritical

domain, resulting in the formation of hydraulic jumps. Here, as we noted earlier, rapid

flow literally impacts on the more slowly moving downstream water mass, resulting in

the telescoping of stream lines and extreme energy loss through turbulence. This type

of flow resistance has been termed impact or spill resistance. Perhaps the most

extreme case of spill resistance occurs at the foot of a waterfall where a free-falling

stream impacts on a plunge pool before resuming channeled flow.

Early experimental studies (Leopold et al, 1960) showed that channel obstructions may

greatly increase flow resistance well beyond that attributable to boundary roughness.

4.15

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

from the 'square law' resistance of equation (4.12) even in flows for which the mean

Froude number is considerably less than unity.

Channel irregularity and alignment refers to major changes in the mean boundary

geometry such as downstream variations in wetted perimeter and cross-sectional size

and shape of the channel. Such large-scale irregularity may be introduced by sand and

gravel bars, ridges, depressions, pools and riffles on the channel bed, and by the

presence of very large boulders. Although a gradual and uniform change in cross-

sectional size and shape will not appreciably effect the magnitude of Manning's n,

abrupt changes or alternations of small to large sections may increase the magnitude of

Manning's n by 0.005 or more.

the periodic alternation of flow and form that occurs in meandering channels. In river

bends with large radius of curvature, the resistance increment attributable to

meandering may be relatively low but in bends of tight curvature flow resistance and

Manning's n will be increased measurably. Wherever flowing water is forced to change

its direction of flow at channel bends the deflection creates internal distortion resistance

and energy dissipation by eddying, secondary circulation, and by increased shear rate.

Internal distortion resistance has been shown to be twice the magnitude of skin

resistance in very tightly curved channel bends in a laboratory flume (Leopold et al,

1960) and there is no reason to suppose that flow resistance and Manning's n does not

also increase with decreasing bend radius in natural rivers.

Sediment load probably is not an important factor influencing flow resistance in most

rivers but it does become a significant control in rivers which carry unusually high

concentrations of suspended sediment. In sufficient concentration suspended

sediment can actually dampen the turbulence in the flow and reduce the overall level of

flow resistance; important early contributors to these ideas were Vanoni and Nomicos

(1960), and Bagnold (1954), among others.

4.16

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

A major world river carrying such extremely sediment-laden flows is the Yellow River in

China. This river is so heavily laden with wind-blown loess eroded from the Interior

Plateau that it commonly transports more sediment than water! The flow is so

dominated by the suspended particulates that its special character is becoming the

basis of a new sub-branch of fluid mechanics - that of hyperconcentrated flow.

It also has been argued (Chow, 1959) that, because energy is used to maintain

bedload transport, Manning's n must increase as the rate of bedload transport

increases. It is not likely, however, that this effect is measurable because it is

accompanied by other confounding changes in the flow. In any case, general

observation suggests that this factor exerts a relatively unimportant influence on the

resistance to flow in open channels.

Estimating Manning's n

Manning's n is most commonly estimated for a river channel by employing either (a)

descriptive rating tables and reference photographs; (b) the Cowan procedure; or (c)

empirical relations directly linking n to the size of the boundary material.

An example of a simple descriptive rating table for Manning's n is shown in Figure 4.3.

Matching the field conditions to the nearest description facilitates the estimate of the

actual roughness factor. Although this estimating procedure is often quite a challenge

to the uninitiated, river engineers and scientists who work routinely at estimating

Manning's n quickly become adept at its quite accurate assessment based on a field

inspection.

4.17

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Minimum Normal Maximum

A: Artificial channels and canals

1. Smooth concrete: 0.012

2. Ordinary concrete lining: 0.013

3. Shot concrete, untroweled, and earth channels in best condition: 0.015

4. Straight unlined earth canals in good condition: 0.020

B: Small streams (bankfull width <35 m)

(a) Low-slope streams (on plains)

1. Clean, straight, bankfull stage, no deep pools: 0.025 0.030 0.033

2. Same as above but more gravel and weeds: 0.030 0.035 0.040

3. Clean, winding, some pools and shoals: 0.033 0.040 0.045

4. Same as above, but some weed and gravel: 0.035 0.045 0.050

5. Same as above but at less than bankfull stage: 0.040 0.048 0.055

6. Same as above but with more gravel present: 0.045 0.050 0.060

7. Sluggish reaches, weedy, deep pools: 0.050 0.070 0.080

8. Very weedy reaches, deep pools; or floodways

with a heavy stand of timber: 0.075 0.100 0.150

(b) Sand bed channels with no vegetation

(typical of small streams but applies to rivers of all scales)

1. Lower-regime flow (F<1.0) with (a) a bed of ripples: 0.017 0.028

(b) a bed of dunes: 0.018 0.035

2. Near critical or transitional flow over washed-out dunes: 0.014 0.024

3. Upper regime flow (F>1.0) with (a) a plane bed: 0.011 0.015

(b) standing waves: 0.012 0.016

(c) antidunes: 0.012 0.020

(c) Steep mountain streams (steep banks, trees

and brush along banks submerged at high stages

1. Bed of gravels, cobbles and a few small boulders: 0.030 0.040 0.050

2. Bed of cobbles with large boulders: 0.040 0.050 0.070

C: Large rivers (bankfull width> 35m); the value of n is less than

that for small streams of similar description because relative roughness

typically is lower and banks offer less effective resistance to flow.

1. Regular section with no boulders or brush: 0.025 0.060

2. Irregular and rough boundary: 0.035 0.100

D: Floodplain surfaces

(a) Pasture, no brush

Short to high grass: 0.025 0.035 0.050

(b) Cultivated areas

1. No crop 0.020 0.030 0.040

2. Mature row and field crops: 0.025 0.035 0.050

(c) Brush

1. Scattered brush and heavy weeds: 0.035 0.050 0.070

2. Light brush and trees in summer (full foliage): 0.040 0.060 0.080

3. Medium to dense brush in summer (full foliage): 0.070 0.100 0.160

(d) Trees

1. Dense willows in summer: 0.110 0.150 0.200

2. Heavy stand of timber, a few down trees, undergrowth: 0.080 0.100 0.120

4.3: A rating table for Manning's friction factor, n, based on the type and condition of the channel

boundary and flood plain and the nature of riparian vegetation (based on data from the U.S.

Department of Agriculture and Simons and Richardson, 1966).

4.18

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

For those unpracticed at the task, estimating Manning's n also can be facilitated by

comparing the field site in question with photographs of river channels for which

Manning's n has been measured. One widely used set of reference photographs is

published by the United States Geological Survey (Barnes, 1967). The field operator

simply refers to the reference channel which most closely resembles the field

conditions in order to form an estimate of Manning's n.

Estimating Manning's n from a general rating table often involves the mental integration

of a number of quite different contributions to the overall roughness factor and the

Cowan procedure is one attempt to break the assessment down into component

estimates (Cowan, 1954).

boundary materials;

n1 = a surface irregularity correction;

n2 = a channel shape/size correction;

n3 = a correction for the influence of obstructions;

n4 = a vegetation correction factor;

and m = a correction factor to account for the degree of meandering.The

appropriate values for the components in equation (4.26) are shown in Figure 4.4.

For example, a meandering channel (sinuosity index = 1.3) with a smooth unvegetated

alluvial boundary and slightly irregular banks, a pool and riffle sequence producing

frequently alternating but otherwise unobstructed flow, would be characterized by

equation (4.26) as follows:

4.19

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Such a channel would correspond with the channel type B(a)3 in Figure 4.3.

Manning's n may also be estimated directly from the roughness of the boundary

measured as a representative particle diameter. For example, implicit in equation (4.25)

is a relationship linking Manning's n and the size of the bed material. Noting from the

1 1 Rh1/6

SI-unit version of equation (4.24) that = , equation (4.25) can

f 8g n

1 Rh1/6

be written = 1.0 + 2.0 log (y/D84) .................................(4.27a)

8g n

y1/6

or if Rh y, simplification leads to: n= y ......................(4.27b)

8.859(1.0+2.0log D )

84

Swiss engineer, A. Strickler. He found that, for straight uniform reaches of gravel-bed

rivers in the Swiss Alps,

It is important to note here that this Strickler relation, as it is known, and that expressed

by equation (4.27), only should be applied to gravel bed rivers in which total

resistance to flow is simply the result of skin resistance alone. As other sources of

resistance begin to contribute significantly to the total, these equations will increasingly

underestimate the actual magnitude of n. In this sense equations (4.27) and (4.28)

estimate the minimum value of Manning's n.

4.20

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Rock-cut boundary.....................................................................................................0.025

Boundary Fine gravel ................................................................................................................ 0.024

materials Coarse gravel boundary..............................................................................................0.028

Degree of slightly eroded banks....................................................................................0.005

channel Moderate: Comparable with dredged channel in fair to poor

cross-sectional condition; some minor bank slumping and erosion......................................0.010

irregularity Severe: Extensive bank slumps and moderate bank erosion;

jagged irregular rock-cut materials...............................................................0.020

n2 Gradual: Changes in size and shape are gradual........................................................0.000

Occasional alternation: Large and small sections alternate

Variation in occasionally or shape changes to cause occasional

channel shifting of flow from side to side..................................................................0.005

cross-section Frequent alternation: Large & small sections alternate or

shape and area shape changes cause frequent shifting of flow from

side to side.......................................................................................0.010 to 0.015

Negligible.................0.00

n3 Determination of n3 is based on the presence and

characteristics of obstructions such as debris, slumps, 0.010

stumps, exposed roots, boulders and fallen and lodged Minor ................to 0.015

Relative logs. Conditions considered in other steps must not be

effect of reevaluated (double counted) in this determination. In 0.020

obstructions judging the relative effect of obstructions, consider the Appreciable... .....to 0.030

extent to which the obstructions occupy or reduce

average water area; the shape (sharp or smooth) and 0.040

position and spacing of the obstructions. Severe................to 0.060

Low: Dense but flexible grasses where flow depth is 2-3 x the

height of vegetation or supple tree seedlings (willow, poplar) 0.005

where flow depth is 3-4 x vegetation height...........................................................to 0.010

Medium: Turf grasses in flow 1-2 times vegetation height; stemmy grasses

n4 where flow is 2-3 x vegetation height; moderately dense brush on 0.010

banks where Rh>0.7 m............................................................................................to 0.025

High: Turf grasses in flow of same height; foliage-free willow or poplar,

Vegetation 8-10 years old and intergrown with brush on channel banks 0.025

where Rh>0.7m; bushy willows, 1 year old, Rh>0.7m...........................................to 0.050

Very High: Turf grasses in flow half as deep; bushy willows (1 year old)

with weeds on banks; some vegetation on the bed; trees with 0.050

weeds and brush in full foliage where Rh>5m.........................................................to 0.100

m

Minor: Sinuosity index = 1.0 to1.2................................................................................1.00

Degree of Appreciable: Sinuosity index = 1.2 to 1.5.....................................................................1.15

Meandering Severe: Sinuosity index >1.5.........................................................................................1.30

4.4: Determination of Manning's roughness coefficient by the Cowan procedure (after Chow,

1959).

4.21

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

The relative performance of equations (4.27) and (4.28) is illustrated in Figure 4.5. It has

been assumed here that D84=2D50 (on the basis of typical grain-size distributions in

gravel-bed rivers; see Shaw and Kellerhals (1982). For the finer gravels (D50 = 5 mm;

D84 = 10 mm), equations (4.27) and (4.28) essentially yield the same results (n = 0.02)

although there clearly is considerable divergence in the coarser gravels at relatively

shallow depths of flow (<1.0 m). In general it seems likely that equation (4.27) is the

more reliable estimator simply because it includes the effects of depth variation in the

'relative smoothness term', y/D84. Nevertheless, for bed material up to about 10 cm in

diameter and depths greater than about 0.5 m, the simpler Strickler relation appears

to perform adequately. Examples of the application of equations (4.27) and (4.28) are

shown in Sample Problems 4.3 and 4.4.

Eqn 4.28; D 50 = 0.25 Eqn 4.28; D 50 = 0.05 Eqn 4.28; D 50 = 0.005

.09

.08

.07

Manning's n

.06

.05

.04

.03

.02

.01

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

Flow depth, y (metres)

4.5: Manning's n computed from equations (4.27) and (4.28) for a range of

particle size and depth of flow.

4.22

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Problem: An open channel of rectangular section 100 m wide with a slope of 0.0005 must carry a

discharge of 300 m3s-1. If the bed consists of uniformly packed and roughly spherical pebbles of 10 cm

median diameter, what will be the depth of flow?

Solution : Since the channel is quite wide we will assume that Rh = y so that we can recast equation

(4.23) thus:

y2/3s1/2 y5/3s1/2 y5/3(0.0005)1/2 y5/3

Q = wd = w or 300 = 100 = 2.236

n n n n

Introducing the Strickler equation (n = 0.0478D501/6) here yields:

y5/3 y5/3

300 = 2.236 = 2.236

0.0478D501/6 0.0478(0.1)1/6

y5/3

which simplifies to 300 = 2.236 and further to 300 = 67.758 y5/3

0.033

So, y5/3 = 4.428 and y = 4.4283/5 = 2.44 m

Thus the flow depth will be 2.44 m and the mean velocity will be 1.23 ms-1.

Problem: A field operator surveys a 200 m-wide rectangular channel carrying a 3 m-deep flow for which

the shear velocity and flow velocity were respectively measured at 0.14 ms-1 and 1.5 ms-1. Because her

detailed field notes were subsequently lost, you must estimate the water-surface slope and the median

size of the bed material at the time of the survey.

Solution: To solve this problem we first need to determine the water-surface slope from the known shear

velocity so that we can solve the Manning equation for n; n can then be used to estimate the size of the

bed material.

Since the channel has a high w/d ratio (200/3 = 67), we can safely assume that Rh = y. We know

0.058

that v* = / = gys = 0.14 so water surface slope must have been s = = 0.00067.

9.81x3

Thus the Manning equation for this channel can be written:

y2/3s1/2 (3)2/3(0.00067)1/2

n = = = 0.036

v 1.5

The link between Manning's n and D50 is provided by the Strickler relation [equation (4.28a)]:

n = 0.0151 D501/6 (D50 in mm) or 0.06 = 0.0151 D501/6

Solving for D50 yields D50 = (0.036/0.0151)6 = 180 mm.

Alternatively, we might have used equation (3.92b) to estimate D84:

31/6 y

n = 0.036 = ; log = 1.3829 and D84 = 0.125 m or 125 mm.

y D84

8.859(1.0+2.0log )

D84

Although these two solutions for particle size are of the same order of magnitude, the difference

(remember that D84/D50 2.0 and that the equivalent D50 from equation (4.27) therefore is about 63 mm)

should remind us that these empirical equations constitute rather imprecise science!

4.23

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Although the Strickler equation is used widely in gravel-bed river engineering, there are

other empirical relationships that might also be used (see Bray, 1982). All such

empirical relationships are similar in form and only work well when applied in

environments similar to those in which they were developed. Furthermore, we must not

forget that these relationships specify Manning's n for the given particle size or relative

roughness only. As such they are estimates of minimum n; actual values will be

higher to the extent that sources of flow resistance other than boundary roughness are

influencing flow in the channel.

In the discussion in this and earlier chapters we have been concerned only with the

mean velocity of flow and the factors controlling it. But of course we are all aware that,

in a natural channel, the velocity varies considerably within the flow, faster in the deeper

water in the middle of the stream and more slowly in the shallower water near the

banks. We now need to explore the nature of this within-flow variation in velocity and

the attempts that have been made to explain why it occurs.

References

A.S.C.E., 1963, Task force on friction factors in open channels: Proceedings of the American Society of

Civil Engineers, 89, HY2, 97.

Bagnold, R.A., 1954, Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid

under shear: The Royal Society of London Proceedings, Series A, 225, 49-63.

Barnes,H.H., 1967, Roughness characteristics of natural channels. Water Supply Paper 1894, US

Geological Survey, Washington, DC, 213 pp.

Bray, D.I., 1982, Flow resistance in gravel-bed rivers. In Gravel-bed Rivers, Hey, R.D., Bathurst, C. and

Thorne, C.R. (Editors), John Wiley and Sons, 109-132.

Chow, V.T., 1959, Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw Hill, New York, 680p.

Cowan, W.L., 1954, Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients. Agricultural Engineering, Vol 37 (7) 473-

475.

Einstein, H.A. and Barbarossa, N.L., 1952, River channel roughness: American Society of Civil Engineers

Transactions, 117, 1121-1146.

4.24

Chapter 4: Mean flow and flow resistance in open channels

Hickin, E.J., 1984, Vegetation and river channel dynamics: Canadian Geographer, 28 (2) 111-126.

Leopold, L.B., Bagnold, R.A., Wolman, M.G. and Brush, L.M., 1960, Flow resistance in sinuous or

irregular channels: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282D.

Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G. and Miller, J.P., 1964, Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology, Freeman San

Francisco, 522 p.

Limerinos, J.T., 1970, Determination of the Manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural

channels. Water Supply Paper 1898-B, US geological Survey, 47 pp.

Shaw, J. and Kellerhals, R., 1982, The composition of Recent alluvial gravels: Alberta Research Council,

Bulletin 41, 151p.

Simons, D.B. and Richardson, E.V., 1966, Resistance to flow in alluvial channels: United States

Geological Survey Professional Paper 422-J, 61p.

Vanoni, V.A. and Nomicos, G.N., 1960, Resistance properties of sediment laden streams: American

Society of Civil Engineers Transactions, 125, 1140-1175.

4.25

- Fire SprinklersDiunggah olehIvan Marin Borquez
- Hydraulics(Rough Boundary)Diunggah olehAnkush Thakur
- NIKURADSE(1933)translated NASA.pdfDiunggah olehkenano
- Engineer.essayDiunggah olehranajit.gngl2542
- Turbulence Physics and Modeling LecturesDiunggah olehVyssion
- Flushing System TipsDiunggah olehrecobra77
- Thermal Power Engineering SyllabusDiunggah olehSrikanth Srinivas
- Space & TimeDiunggah olehtrb301
- Convective Mass TransferDiunggah olehSandra Enn Bahinting
- PDF (Published Version)Diunggah oleh3azeez
- 18Diunggah olehReem Alaa
- ATOMIZAÇÃO_phd1Diunggah oleheustacco
- EAMCET_PB_Physics_Jr Inter Physics_01_01UNITS AND DIMENSIONS.pdfDiunggah olehThota Revanth
- Cur GeriDiunggah olehcristina.sorana.ionescu6397
- Ultrasonic Gas Flow Meter BasicsDiunggah olehMalouk Cheniouni
- Chap8.pdfDiunggah olehJames Jones
- Mud Report 1Diunggah olehBrahim Letaief
- Principles of fluid mechanicsDiunggah olehsajijustus
- lec16Diunggah olehTommyVercetti
- JNNFM Momentum TransferDiunggah olehSanjeev Kumar Ghai
- Unidirectional Flow and Sediment TransportDiunggah olehRizka
- Heat Exchanger DesignDiunggah olehcoldness_13
- 9780817682378-c2Diunggah olehPato Patiño Muñoz
- Achieving Hover Equilibrium in Free Flight With a Flexible Flapping WingDiunggah olehiwe1234
- Poiseuille y TurbulenciaDiunggah olehfrankkqqzz
- Regimen Turbular y LaminarDiunggah olehBruna Chávarry Hernández
- Experimental study of heat transfer parameters of serrated plate fin heat exchanger for different materialsDiunggah olehIJIERT-International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology
- Pipe Network TablesDiunggah olehAhmed
- losses-in-pipiing-lab.pdfDiunggah olehMuhd Fazrin
- EX A8 AgitationDiunggah olehChristelle Paula C. Batac

- GeneratorDiunggah olehSubjektivno Mentalna Stanja
- 'Wattsup' 9th Issue Environment Protection Technologies SpecialDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- air quality systemsDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- How to Use DialuxDiunggah olehDestiany Prawidyasari
- BIS List of 946 ItemsDiunggah olehMayank Agrawal
- Process Design of Spray Chamber or Spray Tower Type AbsorberDiunggah olehsatish_shah_15
- TANK Design DetailingDiunggah olehTiffany Vabiola
- Hamyar Energy NFPA 291 - 2007Diunggah olehJuan Mate
- Linear Flourescent T5 LongLast Lamps Data Sheet en Tcm181-12831Diunggah olehmainpc1237325
- d-shackleDiunggah olehAditya Singh
- Manson.pdfDiunggah olehGajanan Gaikwad
- ivc-valves.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- L&T-Process-Ball-Valves.pdfDiunggah olehUnna Malai
- IS.813.1986Diunggah olehHerold Melwyn Dcosta
- SizingTransformers.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- Rim PullDiunggah olehPrakash Sundaram
- load factor as per is code.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- СТО 79814898 104-2008Parts and elements of pipelines.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- GOST 5520-79 Rolled sheet of carbon.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- seamless steel pipes-2.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- OST 34 10.699-97-elbows.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- Semi Killed SteelsDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- Basics 2016Diunggah olehandy131078
- heattreatment.pptDiunggah olehroyalmechno
- 134363_636614723910013060.docxDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- Unit2.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- Westermann TablesDiunggah olehanandbakshi30
- Study_on_mechanical_properties_of_FGD_matrix_compo.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy
- P427_Dynamics of wet flue gas desulfurization in spray absorber.pdfDiunggah olehNaveen Reddy

- 112105171Diunggah olehAZBYCX
- Impulse OmntDiunggah olehAqeel Ali
- reservoir drive mechanisms- 16ME-PET-S06.pptxDiunggah olehjahanzeb
- Tri_P10Diunggah olehSaqib Mirza
- pump intakeDiunggah olehAnonymous CMS3dL1T
- Linear DisplacementDiunggah olehFlorian Ananias Byarugaba
- Trans O MaticDiunggah olehizzybj
- Fomtec Afff 3Diunggah olehThomas Sellers
- 1-s2.0-0016236186901961-mainDiunggah oleh1AdityaPathania1
- Shape Effects on DragDiunggah olehshivansh231
- PM4Diunggah olehMuhammad Jahanzaib
- SGChapt10.pdfDiunggah olehAditya Garg
- Final Project for Advanced Fluid MechanicsDiunggah olehMohammed Suleman
- 87426770-Experiment-9Diunggah olehGuianne Carlo Bustamante
- 6295-FinalReport (2)Diunggah olehAbhishek Mishra
- LiftDiunggah olehJaisurya Sharma
- CE F212.docxDiunggah olehVinayak
- Lubricant RecommendationDiunggah olehClaudio Carmona Turletti
- SI_Heat_4e_Chap10_lecture.pdfDiunggah olehYiu Ph
- Chemical Engineering Objective Type Questions SedimentationDiunggah olehKrishna Srikanth
- 7 HydroERM 2014 E RiverModellingDiunggah olehlincol
- FM Final.pdf Filename UTF-8 FM 20finalDiunggah olehSafwan Nasir
- SeriesU5B-Z3 and LFU5B-Z3 Installation InstructionsDiunggah olehWatts
- 2193-6637-1-PB.pdfDiunggah olehFindi Hidayat
- 2D Flow Around Cylinder LBMDiunggah olehRory Locke
- ExternalAero SEA Ugm 2015Diunggah olehSurya Chala Praveen
- Method of Desalting Crude OilDiunggah olehDavid Cruz Zamora
- Fluid DynamicsDiunggah olehAngelique Reyes
- Design of a Supersonic NozzleDiunggah olehPandel
- Helpful Engineering Information Related to Spray NozzlesDiunggah olehRavindra Mahadeokar

## Lebih dari sekadar dokumen.

Temukan segala yang ditawarkan Scribd, termasuk buku dan buku audio dari penerbit-penerbit terkemuka.

Batalkan kapan saja.