From: (b) (6)

To: (b) (6)

Cc: (b) (6)
Subject: TCA: VF-300 types
Date: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 4:33:18 PM
Importance: High

(b) (6)

FYI, let us know if you need more justification.

Thanks, (b)
(6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 2:30 PM
To: (b) (6)
Subject: FW: VF-300 types
Importance: High

(b)
(6)
I sent this out to (b) (6) on the 29 th . Let me know what else he needs on it.

(b)
(6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:51 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Subject: RE: VF-300 types

Importance: High

(b) (6)

I could not get your PDF to allow me to alter/edit. I generated a clone spreadsheet with the
information you requested. Please let me know if something doesn’t look correct or make sense. The
stations have also scrubbed the information.

(b)
(6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 8:48 AM
To: (b) (6)

Cc: (b) (6)

Subject: FW: VF-300 types

All,
We are reaching out to each of your sectors to verify what type of vehicle fence
design you require in your AOR’s. I’ve attached a spread sheet that identifies map ID
and planned mileage. Would you please fill in the block that stipulates fence type and
send it back to me. Please keep in mind that the design should be operationally
driven. If you anticipate that your vehicle fence may need to incorporate pedestrian
fence in the future because of operations then VF-1 (rail on post) should be selected
over VF-2 (Normandy style). Consequently if the terrain is harsh and rocky, severely
sloped, sandy soil, etc. then VF-2 may be the best choice. You guys know your
area’s better than most, so we are depending on your input to ensure you get what
you need for your sectors.

Lastly, I will need a brief justification for the designs you picked (VF-1 or VF-2) for
each map ID, as well as why VF was preferred over PF or no fencing in those
areas,for future GAO audits.

Thanks
(b) (6)
(A)SOS
Office of Border Patrol
Tactical Infrastructure Branch
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, D.C. 20229
(b) (6)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Parts of this document may contain sensitive security
information that is controlled under the provisions of 49 CFR 1520. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
 Tucson Sector: Vehicle Fence 300 Locations and Comments

Congres Planned Planned Military Comm. Exisitng Exisitng 22-Feb Cum.

sional Contingency Core Mileage Left to Mileage Left to Mobile Vehicle Fixed Vehicle Actual
Map ID SBI Project # Location District Mileage Mileage construct construct Fence Fence Mileage Perf Fence Type
DV-1 2202-1/AJO Cabeza Prieta 7 0 15.54 0 0 0 0 15.54 Sundt VF-1,Rail-on-Post
Justifications; 1) remote location, 2) Wildlife concern of the wilderness with Pedestrian fence, 3) community input.

DV-3a 1023-4/AJO (b) (6) 7 0 15.48 0 9.74 0 4.8 4.8 Comm. TBD VF-1
Justifications; 1) Different Districts prefer different styles (Bollard vs. Rail-on-Post), 2) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence.

DV-3b 1023-5/AJO (b) (6) 7 0.41 0.4 0 0 0 0 Military TBD VF-1

Justifications; 1) Different Districts prefer different styles (Bollard vs. Rail-on-Post), 2) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence.

EV-1 2204-1/SON Sonoita 8 14.81 7.83 0 7.3 0 7.3 OJS VF-2, Normandy
Justifications; 1) The original EA called for TVB (mobile Vehicle Fence), 2) this is a mostly Forest Service land and is a remote area.

Tohono O'Odham
DV-4a 1024-3/CAG Nation 7 19.36 0 19.36 0 0 0 Comm. TBD VF-1, VF-2
Justifications; 1) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence, VF-1/2 as the terrain permits.

Tohono O'Odham
DV-4b 1024-4/CAG Nation 7 12.94 3.84 0 3.4 2.5 6 OJS VF-1, VF-2
Justifications; 1) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence, VF-1/2 as the terrain permits.

FV-1a 2203-1/DGL Douglas East 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 OJS VF-1

Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.

FV-1b 2203-2/DGL Douglas East 8 6.78 10.66 0 17.44 0 0 0 Comm. TBD VF-1/VF-2
Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.

DV-2 2205-1/AJO Sierra De La Nariz 7 1.52 0 1.52 0 0 0 Comm. TBD VF-1

Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.

DV-5 2206-1/TUC (b) (6) 7 3.03 0 3.03 0 0 0 Comm. TBD VF-1

Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.