Corresponding author:
Iran Jahanbin, MS, Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery,
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Postal Code: 71936-13119, Shiraz, Iran
Tel: +98 711 6474251; Fax: +98 711 6474252; Email: jahanbii@sums.ac.ir
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a systemic and inflammatory disease of unknown etiology
which is mostly characterized by inflammation of the synovial joints. Studies have proved that most
people with RA avoid doing physical activities due to fear that it may worsen the pain or cause pressure on
joints, resulting in decreased muscle strength and ultimately leading to disability of patients. We aimed to
investigate the effects of conditioning exercises on the health status and pain in patients suffering from RA.
Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we enrolled 66 women with confirmed RA
referred to the rheumatology clinic of Hafez hospital, Shiraz, southwest Iran during May-July 2013.
Balanced block randomization method was used to randomize the participants into case and control
groups (two groups of 33 each).Data were collected using visual analog scale (VAS), Arthritis Impact
Measurement Scales 2 short form (AIMS2-SF), and demographic questionnaire. After obtaining
written informed consent, the participants in the case group were asked to participate in conditioning
exercise programs including aerobic, isometric, and isotonic exercises and received a training booklet
explaining the exercises that they could do at home after the intervention.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the health status scores of the
patients in the case groups before and after the intervention (P=0.001). The pain score also decreased
significantly in the case group compared with the control group after the intervention (P=0.003).
Conclusion: We concluded that physical training programs, especially conditioning exercises, could
improve the health status and reduce pain in patients with RA.
Trial Registration Number: IRCT201308187531N3
Please cite this article as: Jahanbin I, Hoseini Moghadam M, Nazarinia MA, Ghodsbin F, Bagheri Z, Ashraf
AR. The Effect of Conditioning Exercise on the Health Status and Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis:
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. IJCBNM. 2014;2(3):169-176.
170 ijcbnm.sums.ac.ir
Conditioning exercise on the health status and pain in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Excluded (n=1)
Notmeeting inclusion criteria (n=0)
Declined to participate (n=1)
Other reasons (n=0)
Randomized (n=65)
Allocation
Allocated to intervention (n=32) Allocated to intervention (n=33)
Received allocated intervention (n=32) Received allocated intervention (n=32)
Did not receive allocated intervention (n=0) Did not receive allocated intervention (n=1)
Follow-Up
Lost to follow-up (n=0) Lost to follow-up (n=0)
Analysis
Analysed (n=32) Analysed (n=32)
Excluded from analysis (n=0) Excluded from analysis (n=0)
The sample size was calculated as 32 in colleagues.19 The items are answered with
each group based on the data of a similar options ranging from all days to no days
study conducted by Stefano Masiero (2007);1 in the previous four weeks. All the items are
also, using Power SSC statistical software measured on a five-point Likert scale scored
(power: 80%, : 0.05) and considering the from 1 to 5.The total scores range from 26 to
following formula, the predicted loss samples 130. The reliability and validity of AIMS2-SF
were taken from 66 patients. were assessed in some studies and were also
n=26(Z1-a/2+Z1-B)^2/(1-2) estimated in Iran by Askary-Ashtiani and
The inclusion criteria were: confirmed colleagues (2009) on 350 patients with RA and
diagnosis of RA, age of 18 or more, Cronbachs alpha was calculated as 0.74-0.89.20
willingness to participate in the study, ability The pain VAS is an instrument in which pain
to perform the exercises twice a week, ability intensity is rated on a four-point scale (scale one:
to understand and communicate in Persian 0-2; scale 2: 2-5; scale 3: 5-8 and scale 4: 8-10).
language, residence in the city where the The scale is anchored by no pain (first scale)
study was done, and lack of osteoarthritis or and worst imaginable pain (fourth scale).
any other inflammatory articular diseases. The case group then was divided into two
Exclusion criteria were suffering from severe groups of 16 participants each. They were
form of the disease, any changes in the asked to participate in conditioning exercise
treatment of articular therapy in the last 6 programs consisting of two 45-minutes
months or during the study, need to change sessions per week for 8 consecutive weeks and
the treatment, performing Joint surgery in the were trained by the researcher. Conditioning
6 months before the intervention, participation exercises included aerobic, isometric, and
in a similar training programs, and absence of isotonic exercises. Moreover, the patients
more than two sessions in training program. received a training complied with the routine
Besides, in case of need to change the treatment program of the clinic.
for the patients, they were excluded from the Immediately after the intervention, the VAS
study; however, we had no such case. and AIMS2 questionnaires were completed
After obtaining written informed consent, again by the participants of both case and control
the researcher explained the aims and method groups. Finally, the patients in the control group
of the research to the patients who were received the same booklet. The collected data
willing to participate in the study and asked were analyzed using SPSS software, version 18.
them to complete the questionnaires. Data The significance level was set at <0.05.
were collected using visual analog scale
(VAS), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Results
2 short form (AIMS2-SF) and demographic
questionnaire containing information about The age range of the patients was 23-63 years.
age, age of occurrence of the disease, duration Their meanSD ages was 48.610.51 and
of the disease, educational level, employment 48.879.24 in the case and control groups,
and marital status. respectively. The meanSD age of the
AIMS2-SF is a self-reported questionnaire occurrence was 39.0010.23 and 40.287.80
with 12 scales to assess five components of years in the case and control group, respectively.
health status in patients with arthritis: physical According to independent t-test, there was no
(12 items), symptom (3 items), affect (5 items), significant difference between the two groups
and social interaction (4 items), and role (2 with respect to their mean age (P=0.74) and
items) components. The 26-item AIMS2-SF mean age of occurrence (P=0.57).
is a shorter version of the AIMS2 (originally The mean duration of the disease in the
designed by Meenanand colleagues, 1980) majority of the studied cases (64%) was more
which was developed by Gullemin and than 5 years and Chi-square test showed
172 ijcbnm.sums.ac.ir
Conditioning exercise on the health status and pain in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Table 1: Comparison of the meanSD of pain score and health status before and after the intervention in the
case and control groups
Variables Groups meanSD P value meanSD P value P value
Before (Between After (Between (Within
intervention Groups) intervention Groups) Groups)
Case 2.840.12 2.030.12
0.000
Pain group
0.390 0.003
(Visual analog scale) Control 2.710.09 2.530.08
0.05
Group
Case 6.411.84 8.081.24
0.000
Physical Group
0.370 0.001
health Control 6.801.61 6.761.70
0.603
Group
Case 4.291.96 6.481.66
0.000
Pain and other group
0.454 0.001
symptoms Control 4.631.61 4.581.70
0.701
Group
Case 4.601.85 6.681.44
Health 0.000
Psychological Group
Status 0.654 0.001
health Control 4.801.48 4.911.27
(AIMS2-SF) 0.415
Group
Case 4.331.81 5.951.29
0.000
Social Group
0.615 0.001
interaction Control 4.551.57 4.491.25
0.698
Group
Case 5.542.04 7.941.69
0.000
Group
Function 0.894 0.001
Control 5.471.84 5.781.73
0.161
Group
174 ijcbnm.sums.ac.ir
Conditioning exercise on the health status and pain in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis
176 ijcbnm.sums.ac.ir