COURSE OUTLINE FOR WRITS AND SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS

I. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES

A. RULE 57 PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT

1. Tan vs. Adre, 450 SCRA 145
2. Davao Light and Power, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 204 SCRA
343.
3. Adlawan vs. Judge Valeriano Tomol, G.R. No. 63225, 03 April
1990.
4. RCBC vs. Castro, 168 SCRA 49.
5. Mangila vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 125027, 12 August 2002.
6. Valdemieso vs. Damalerio, 451 SCRA 638.
7. PCL Industries Manufacturing Corporation vs. Court of
Appeals, 486 SCRA 214
8. Spouses Tanchan vs. Allied Banking Corporation, G.R. No.
164510, 25 November 2008.
9. Carpio vs. Macadaeg, 9 SCRA 552
10.Joseph Tay Chun Suy vs. Court of Appeals, et. al., 20 August
1992.
11.Dela Victoria vs. Burgos, 62 SCAD 112, G.R. No. 111190, 27 June
1995.
12.Spouse Yu vs. Ngo Yet Te, G.R. No. 155868, 06 February 2007.

B. RULE 58 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1. Sabalones vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 106169, 14 February

1994.
2. Manila International Airport Authority vs. Rivera Village
Lessee Homeowners Association, Inc., 471 SCRA 358.
3. Bacolod City Water District vs. Labayen, 446 SCRA 110.
4. Developers Group of Companies, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals,
291 SCRA 715, 1993.
5. Ching vs. Court of Appeals, 398 SCRA 88.
6. PSBA vs. Quezon City, G.R. No. 159277, 21 December 2004.
7. Philippine Pacific Fishing Co., Inc. vs. Luna, 112 SCRA 604.
8. Andres vs. Cuevas, 460 SCRA 38
9. EPZA vs. CHR, G.R. no. 1014760, 14 April 1994.
10.Carbungco vs. Court of Appeals, 20 January 1990.
11.Bataclan vs. Court of Appesl, 175 SCRA 764.
12.Valley Trading Corporation vs. Court of First Instance, 171
SCRA 501

C. RULE 59 RECEIVERSHIP
1. Normandy vs. Duque, 29 SCRA 385.
2. Francisco vs. Rodriguez, 6 SCRA 443
3. Surigao Development Bank vs. Buston, 48 SCRA 308
4. Philippine Trust Co. vs. Santamaria, 53 Phil. 63
 5. Pacific Merchandising Corporation vs. Consolacion
Insurance & Surety Co., 73 SCRA 564
6. Duque vs. Court of First Instance of Manila, 13 SCRA 420.
7. Dela Riva vs. Molina Salvador, 32 Phil. 278.

D. RULE 60 REPLEVIN
1. Chiao Liong Tan vs. Court of Appeals, 46 SCAD 435
2. Bagalihog vs. Fernandez, 198 SCRA 614
3. Chua vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 79021, 17 May 1993
4. Bachrach Motor Corporation vs. Alber, 60 Phil. 308
5. Case and Nutz vs. Ango, 77 Phil. 517
6. La Tondena Distilleria vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 88938, 08
June 1992.
7. Olimpia International, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-
43236, 20 December 1989.
8. Maningo vs. IAC, G.R. Nos. 73559-62, 26 March 1990.
9. Luneta Motors vs. Menendez, 7 SCRA 956
10.Peoples surety and Insurance Co. vs. Aragon, 7 SCRA 245
11.Mortos vs. Ello & Gonzales, 93 Phil. 49.
12.Bataan Hardwood Corporation vs. Dy Pac & Co., Inc., 43 Phil.
450

E. RULE 61 SUPPORT PENDENTE LITE

1. Francisco vs. Zandiela, 61 Phil. 752
2. Quintana vs. Lerma, 24 Phil. 285
3. Lerma vs. Court of Appeals, 61 SCRA 440
4. Olayvar vs. Olayvar, 98 Phil. 52
5. Mendoza vs. Parungao, 49 Phil. 271
6. Villanueva vs. Villanueva, 54 Phil. 9

II. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS

A. RULE 62 INTERPLEADER
1. Sanpiro Finance Corporation vs. IAC, 220 SCRA 537

B. RULE 63 DECLARATORY RELIEF AND SIMILAR REMEDIES

1. Philnabank Employees Association vs. Estanislao, G.R. No.
104209, 16 November 1993
2. Alliance of Government Workers vs. Ministry of Labor and
Employment, 124 SCRA 1
3. Rural Bank of Olongapo Inc. vs. Commissioner of Land
Registration, 102 SCRA 794.
4. Office of the Ombudsman vs. Francisco Ibay, G.R. No. 137538,
03 September 2001.
5. Ortega vs. Quezon City Government, G.R. No. 161400, 02
September 2005.
6. Visayan Packing Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 155 SCRA
542.
C. RULE 64 REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS OR
RESOLUTIONS OF THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND THE
COMMISSION ON AUDIT

1. Dario vs. Mison, 178 SCRA 84

2. Relampagos vs. COMELEC,

D. RULE 65 CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS

1. Special People Foundation, Inc. vs. Canda, et. al., G.R. No.
160932, 14 January 2013.
2. Cervantes vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 159022, 23 February
2005.
3. Santos vs. Cruz, G.R. Nos. 170096-97, 03 March 2006.
4. Acance vs. Court of Appeals, 453 SCRA 458
5. Liberty Insurance Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
104405, 13 May 1993
6. Lim vs. Vianzon, G.R. No. 137187, 03 August 2006.
7. Santiago vs. Vasquez, 217 SCRA 633
8. Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Siros Solati vs. FOP
Corporation, G.R. 145043, 13 February 2004.
9. Jacinto Olan, et. al., vs. Court of Appeals, 112 SCAD 260
10.Lalican vs. Hon. Vergara, 85 SCAD 290, G.R. No. 108619, 31 July
1997
11.Casiano Angchangco vs. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 122728, 13
February 1997.
12.BPI vs. Manikin, G.R. No. 148789, 16 January 2003.
13.Manalo vs. PAIC Savings Bank, G.R. No. 146531, 18 March 2005.
14.Tomas Claudio Memorial College, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 152568, 16 February 2004.
15.Socorro Chua vs. Santos, G.R. No 132467, 18 October 2004.

E. RULE 66- QUO WARRANTO

1. Coruyo vs. Secretary of Justice, 57 SCRa 663
2. Cristobal vs. Melchor, 75 SCRA 175
3. Conchita Romualdez-Yap vs. CSC, 43 SCAD 1010, G.R. No.
104226, 12 August 1993.
4. Topacio vs. Associate Justice SB Gregory Ong, G.R. No.
179895, 18 December 2008.

F. RULE 67 EXPROPRIATION
1. Municipality of Binan vs. Garcia, 180 SCRA 576
2. Meralco vs. Court of Appeals, 206 SCRA 196
3. NPC vs. Jocson, 205 SCRA 520
4. Benguet Consolidted, Inc. vs. Republic, 143 SCRA 466
5. Bardillon vs. Barangay Masili, Calamba, Laguna, G.R. No.
146886, 30 April 2003.

G. RULE 68 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE

 H. RULE 69 PARTITION
1. Lim de Mesa vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 109387, 25 April
1994
2. Vda. De Daffon vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. n129017, 20
August 2002.

I. RULE 70 FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL DETAINER

1. Bunyi, et. al. vs. Factor, G.R. No. 172547, 30 June 2007.
2. Barba vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126638, 06 February 2002.
3. Spouses Penas vs. Court of Appeals, 53 SCAD 128, G.R. No.
112734, 07 July 1994.
4. Elave vs. Court of Appeals, 26 April 1989.
5. Lilia Peralta-Labrador vs. Bugarin, G.R. No. 165177, 25 August
2005.
6. Sps. Rev. Banes vs. Lutheran Church in the Philippines, G.R.
No. 142308, 15 November 2005.
7. Limbawan vs. Acosta, G.R. No. 148606, 30 June 2008.
8. Heirs of Eugenio Sevilla vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 49823,
26 February 1992.
9. Malabanan vs. Rural Bank of Cabuyao, Inc., G.R. No. 163495,
08 May 2009.
10.Dela Rosa vs. Carlos, G. R. No. 147549, 23 October 2003.
11.Sunflower Neighborhood Association vs. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 136274, 02 September 2004.
12.Araos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 107057, 02 June 1994.
13.Uy vs. Hon. Pedro Santiago, G. R. No. 131237, 31 July 2000.
14.Abaya Investment Corporation vs. Merit Phils, Inc., G.R. No.
176324, 16 April 2008

J. RULE 71 CONTEMPT
1. In Re: Contempt of Datumanong, Jimmie Ter-Equen, G.R. No.
150274, 04 August 2006.

III. SPECIAL WRITS

A. WRIT OF AMPARO
1. Rule on the Writ of Amparo - A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC, 25 September
2007.
2. Secretary of National Defense vs. Manalo, et. al., G.R. No.
180906, 07 October 2008.
3. Tapuz, et. al. vs. Hon. Judge Elmo Del Rosario, G.R. No.
182484, June 17, 2008.
4. Canlas vs. Napico Homeowners Association, G.R. No. 182795,
June 5, 2008.
5. Rubrico vs. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, et. al., G.R. No. 183871,
February 18, 2010
6. Razon vs. Tagitis, G.R. No. 182498, February 16, 2010.
7. Navia, et. al. vs. Pardico, G.R. No. 184467, June 19, 2012.
 8. Lozada vs. President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, G.R. Nos.
184379-80 April 24, 2012.
9. Spouses Nerio vs. Barangay Captain Bernabe Arcayan, G.R.
No. 183460, March 12, 2013.
10.Secretary Leila De Lima vs. Gatdula, G.R. No. 204528, 19
February 2013.
11.Infant Julian Yusa y Caram vs. Segui, et. al., G.R. No. 193652,
05 August 2014.
12.Mison vs. Gallegos, G.R. No. 210759, June 23, 2015.

B. WRIT OF HABEAS DATA

1. Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data - A. M. No. 08-1-16-SC, January 22,
2008
2. In The Matter Of The Petition For The Writ Of Amparo And
The Writ Of Habeas Data In Favor Of Melissa C. Roxas,
Melissa C. Roxas vs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, et. al., G.R. No.
189155, September 7, 2010.
3. Castillo vs. Cruz, et. al., G.R. No. 182165, November 25, 2009.
4. In the Matter of the Petition for the Writ Of Amparo And
Habeas Data In Favor Of Noriel Rodriguez, Noriel Rodriguez,
vs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 191805, April 16, 2013.

C. WRIT OF KALIKASAN
1. Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases - A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC.
2. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-bio Tech
Applications, Inc. vs. Greenpeace Southeast Asia, et. al., G.R.
No. 290271, 290276, 290301, 209430, 26 July 2016.
3. Most Reverend Pedro D. Arigo, et. al., vs. Scott H. Swift, et.
al., G.R. No. 206510, 16 September 2014.
4. Resident Marine Mammals of the Protected Seascape Taon
Strait vs. Secretary Angelo Reyes, et. al., G.R. No. 180771,
April 21, 2015
5. LNL Archipelago Minerals, Inc. vs. Agham Partylist, G.R. No.
209165, April 12, 2016

D. WRIT OF CONTINUING MANDAMUS

1. Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases - A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC.
2. Metropolitan Manila Development Authority, et. al. vs.
Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, et. al., G.R. Nos. 171947-
48, 18 December 2008.
3. Metropolitan Manila Development Authority, et. al. vs.
Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, et. al., G.R. Nos. 171947-
48, 15 February 2011.
4. Boracay Foundation, Inc. vs. Province of Aklan, et. al., G.R.
No. 196870, 26 June 2012.
5. Dolot, et. al. vs. Hon. Ramon Paje, et. al., G.R. No. 199199, 27
August 2013.
6. West Tower Condominium Corporation vs. First Philippine
Industrial Corporation, et. al., G.R. No. 194239, 16 June 2015.
IV. SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS

A. RULE ON THE EXAMINAITON OF CHILD WITNESS, A.M. NO. 004-

07-SC November 21, 2000.
1. Genil vs. Judge Rivera, A.M. No. MTJ-06-1619, January 23, 2006
[formerly OCA IPI No. 04-1556-MTJ]
2. Tacorda vs. Judge Clemens, A.M. No. RTJ-13-2359, October 23,
2013 (Formerly O.C.A. IPI No. 12-3851-RTJ)
3. People of the Philippines vs. Ibanez, G.R. No. 197813,
September 25, 2013.
4. People of the Philippines vs. Esugon, G.R. No. 195244, June 22,
2015

B. RULE ON CUSTODY OF MINOR AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN

RELATION TO CUSTODY OF MINORS - A.M. No. 03-04-04-SC, 22
April 2003.
1. In The Matter of Application For The Issuance Of A Writ Of
Habeas Corpus Richard Brian Thornton For And In Behalf Of
The Minor Child Sequeira Jennifer Delle Francisco Thornton
vs. Adelfa Francisco Thornton, G.R. No. 154598, August 16,
2004.
2. Madrinan vs. Madrian, G.R. No. 159374, July 12, 2007.
3. Brown-Araneta vs. Araneta, G.R. No. 190814, October 9, 2013.

C. RULE ON DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE NULLITY OF VOID

MARIAGES AND ANNULMENT OF VOIDABLE MARRIAGES, A.M.
No. 02-11-10-SC March 4, 2003.
1. Bolos vs. Bolos, G.R. No. 186400, October 20, 2010
2. Llave vs. Republic of the Philippines, et. al., G.R. No. 169766,
March 30, 2011
3. Fujiki vs. Marinay, et. al., G.R. No. 196049, June 26, 2013
4. Ando vs. Department of Foreign Affairs, G.R. No. 195432,
August 27, 2014

D. RULE ON LEGAL SEPARATION, A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC, March 4, 2003

1. Quiao vs. Quiao, G.R. No 176556, July 4, 2012.

E. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CASES,

A.M. 10-3-10-SC, 18 October 2011.

F. REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10142 otherwise known as the Financial

Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010.

G. FINANCIAL REHABILITATION RULES OF PROCEDURE, A.M. 12-12-

11-SC, 27 August 2013.
1. Viva Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Keppel Philippines Mining, Inc.,
G.R. No. 177382, February 17, 2016.