Anda di halaman 1dari 1

Lab Report Rubric

Description Marks
Criteria Weightage
awarded

Good coverage of the theories on the subject and


demonstrate the ability to relate its significance to
Objectives / Introduction / the experiment. 15
Theory 0 5: Theories are copied from the lab manual/no theories
6 10: Small amount of research is completed
11-15: Comprehensive research relevant to the topic is done
The ability to report the procedures / methods in
completing the experiment.
Methodology / Procedures 0-5: Procedures are copied from lab manual 10
6-8: Limited elaboration of the procedures of the experiment
9-10: Complete description of the procedures with figures or
other form of illustrations
Results to be presented professionally and relevant
calculations are shown. Graphs are drawn
Results / calculations professionally where necessary. 15
0- 5: Minimum presentation of results
6 -10: Basic results are shown with necessary calculations.
11-15:Further analyses of the results using graphs, tables, etc.
Demonstrate the ability of analysing the results in an
independent and critical way. In-depth discussion is
presented on the variance of the results with theory,
or the effect of the changing of any parameters to
the results. Further discussion is presented on the
improvements of the accuracy if there is any
Discussions 30
discrepancy.
0- 5: Reiteration of the results
6 -10: Discuss the analyses of the results
11-15: Discuss the graphs and tables, etc.
16-20: Provide constructive suggestions for improvement
21-25: Error analyses of the results
26-30: Comments based on the existing research literature
The ability of presenting the neat and tidy report in
the format stated.
Format / Presentation 0-5: lack of standard format, structure and incomprehensible. 10
6-8:basic structure and format is presented
9-10:professional report with standard format and complete
structure and presentation
The ability to cite the referenced authors work.
0: no citation, no reference.
References / Citations 1-2: no citation, only references 5
3:minimum citations and references
4-5: citations and references with correct format
The ability to draw conclusions
0-5: Provide summary of key results.
6-8: Highlight the key indication of the results
Conclusions 15
9-11: Provide suggestion for further analyses
12-15: Relevancy of the experiment to the real-life engineering
problems.

TOTAL 100

Anda mungkin juga menyukai