Prepared by
Pricewaterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd.
India
This consultants report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and
ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical
assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed projects design.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Network: Energy, Utilities & Mining Practice
Performance Improvement Advisory
Building Organizations
Table of Contents
Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................3
Background of the Assam State Electricity Board ..................................................................................................... 3
Background of Assam Power Distribution Company Limited ..................................................................................... 3
Scope of this Study.................................................................................................................................................... 4
Objective of the Study ............................................................................................................................................... 5
Approach & Methodology for the study ...................................................................................................................... 5
Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................................................. 7
Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................................53
Annexure 1: Benchmarking of Organization Structure.......................................................................................... 56
Annexure 2: Stakeholder Discussions: Key Points Discussed.............................................................................. 61
Annexure 3: Tentative List of Various Full Powers ............................................................................................... 62
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 2 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Introduction
Introduction
Background of the Assam State Electricity Board
The Assam State Electricity Board (ASEB) was unbundled into five companies
by the state Government of Assam (GoA) in December 2004 under the
provisions of Electricity Act, 2003. The companies that were formed were Assam
Power Generation Corporation Limited (APGCL), Assam Electricity Grid
Corporation Limited (AEGCL), and three distribution companies named Lower
Assam Electricity Distribution Company Limited (LAEDCL), Upper Assam
Electricity Distribution Company Limited (UAECL), and Central Assam Electricity
Distribution Company Limited (CAEDCL).
The objectives of unbundling were to encourage efficiency, improve the quality
of service and increase the accountability of the management. Experience of the
last 6 years of unbundling suggests that though the Assam power sector has
improved, much scope for improvement in efficiency still remains. Some of the
main issues impeding the successful implementation of unbundling are:
Partial autonomy with regard to financial management: The newly
formed generation, transmission, and distribution companies continue to be
partially autonomous with regard to financial management and operate
under a centralized cash flow mechanism. These expenses have been
prioritized among various heads. Financial management functions such as
investment, funding, and budgeting decision making are being carried out in
consultation with ASEB.
Paucity of well-trained staff: This has resulted in dual charges for
positions that require specialized skills among companies. This leads to
delays in decision making and restricts the introduction of new initiative
within the companies.
Employees running as a unified cadre: Despite the reorganization of
ASEB and the implementation of a staff transfer scheme, employees in the
successor companies have actually run as a unified cadre to protect inter-se
seniority and promotional avenues across the companies. Promotion of the
employees of the rank of Senior Manager (SM) and above is done through
the common seniority list maintained by ASEB for all companies. This is
counter-productive for the employees and for the companies in the long-run
as it prevents the successful implementation of a company-specific structure
aligned with company level objectives and prevents the ability to build
necessary competencies that are essential for each company.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 3 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
The merger of two distribution companies into the third distribution company is
among the key drivers for re-designing the Organization structure of APDCL.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 4 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
STAGES
STAGES
PHASES
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
This report is limited to the study of organization structure for APDCL. The
following approach was adopted while designing the same for APDCL:
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 6 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Uttar Haryana Bijjli Vitran Nigam (UHBVN) and Andhra Pradesh Central Power
Distribution Company Limited (APCPDCL).
Develop Organization Structure, Validate and Finalize: Based on the
previous stages of the approach, the organization structure for APDCL was re-
designed. Successively, based on iterations and need based discussions with
the stakeholders, the proposed organization structure was revised and has now
been captured in this report. The salient points of stakeholder discussions /
feedback are captured appropriately in the report.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 7 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
AS IS Analysis
Present Organizationand TO AS-IS Analysis and TO-BE Recommendations
BE Recommendations
The Reporting Hierarchies in APDCL
There are various levels of hierarchies present in the organization. The following
diagram is a representation of the various levels of hierarchies (above the level
of AM) being followed in the company. The hierarchies are representations of
the legacies followed in the organization and can be used for quick referral.
CGM
GM
DGM
SM
M/DM
AM
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 8 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Based on the information available, employees have been classified into two
categories - Executive and Non Executive.
All employees belonging to grade 10 (G10) and above have been classified as
executives and all employees belonging to grade 9 (G9) and below have been
classified as non executives.
Details of the availability of the data in the data base collected from each
company are given below:
Number of Employees
E / NE
Company Executives Non-Executives
Total Ratio (%)
At HQ At Field At HQ At Field
AEGCL 33 195 77 1550 1855 12 / 88
APDCL 110 494 424 10204 11232 5 / 95
APGCL 44 174 107 1113 1438 15 / 85
Total 187 863 608 12867 14525 7 / 93
In this report, the HR profiling analysis has been carried out for APDCL only.
The main observations that have been made on the basis of the profiling
exercise are as follows:
In APDCL, about 5% of the total employees are in the headquarters and
about 95% of the total employees are in the field offices.
HQ executives form 21% of the total employees working in HQ and field
executives form only 5% of the total employees working in the field. For
APDCL as a whole, Executives form 5% of the total working employees.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 9 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Age Profiling
The main observations that have been made on the basis of the profiling
exercise are as follows:
The average employee age of the company is 52 years.
The average age of executives and non-executives do not vary much as
compared to the company average.
Approximately 70% of the total employees are above the age of 50 years
and approximately 75% executives are above the age of 50 years. This is
the highest among the three companies.
The non-executive to executive ratio for APDCL is 18.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 10 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Retirement Profiling
The main observations that have been made on the basis of the profiling
exercise are as follows:
Approximately 38% of the entire workforce of APDCL will retire by calendar
year16 (CY16)
Approximately 45% of the executives of APDCL will retire by CY16
Approximately 8% of the executives belonging to the level of SM & above
will retire every year till CY16
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 11 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Board
Level
1
Corporate
Level 2
Field
Level 3
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 12 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
AP AP
Indicator Directors UHBVNL OHPC APNPDCL APCPDCL
Genco Transco
Functional 4 3 7 6 6 8
No of Govt Nominee 4 3 1 1 - -
Directors
Other Non-
- 4 2 2 2 -
Executive
Recent Board Size 8 10 10 9 8 8
The above table shows that the number of government nominated directors is
restricted in most utilities (except UHBVNL) to ensure more independence in
operations of the company. The functional directors in most utilities include
functional directors from Operations, Finance, Human resource, Technical /
Projects to assist the CMD/MD.
In UHBVNL (Haryana Discom), the company has formed a committee consisting
of functional directors of the company, known as Committee of Whole Time
Directors (WTD) of the Company. This is popularly called as WTD Committee.
The details and powers of the committee are incorporated in the Article of
Association of the company. The WTD committee has been assigned Full
Powers for making various decisions in order to enable smooth functioning of
the company. The powers of the WTD committee are clearly defined and
separated out from the Board of the company.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 13 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Structural Implications
Recommendations
The introduction of 4 functional directors positions at company Board level
namely Director Projects & MM, Director Human Resource, Director F&A
and Director Operations is proposed. These positions are in addition to
existing position of CMD of APDCL.
These positions at the Board level need to be selected based on merit and
functional requirements and must not be treated as posts by promotion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 14 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Director CGM
CGM DGM CGM
Vigilance & Commercial &
LAZ HR LAZ P&P
Security Tariff
Functions working in Functions working in APDCL for APDCL requirements Functions working
APDCL for other utility outside APDCL but for
requirements also APDCL requirements
also
Note: The position under each broad box is reporting directly to CMD.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 15 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 16 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Structural Implications
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 17 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Board Audit
Committee
Chairman &
Managing
Director
Company SM
Secretary & PRO Internal Audit
Director
DGM
Vigilance &
Legal
Security
CGM
GM CGM CGM CGM CGM
Rural
Projects HR F&A LZ Guwahati Commercial
Electrification
CGM SM GM
GM CGM DGM
Material Admin, Welfare, Corporate
Civil UZ, Jorhat IT & MIS
Management IR Accunts, Taxation
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 18 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
The centralized legal cell has been proposed for handling all commercial
and employee legal cases for the company. This position will be filled by the
DGM HR of LAZ. The legal cell will handle cases related to land
acquisitions, consumer complaints, employee complaints, recovery of
unpaid amounts etc.
The activities related to company secretary, security, PRO will be handled
by company secretary.
The proposed functions under each Director level position are discussed under
subsequent sections of this chapter. However, we are highlighting some of the
key changes proposed under each Director level position.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 19 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 20 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Corporate
Electrical Civil F&A HR IT Medical Security Secretariat Total
Designation Legal
E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P
CGM 5 6 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8
GM 9 9 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 10 12
DGM 28 31 2 0 3 3 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 38
SM 161 159 19 17 8 11 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 189 202
AM / DM / M* 365 365 0 0 25 25 2 15 0 2 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 407 422
CMO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 568 570 21 18 37 41 5 26 0 3 15 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 649 683
1) The numbers mentioned in above table are based on our discussions at corporate
office and on assumption that all the field level circle heads and division heads
positions are filled.
2) *: The count of AM / DM / M is based on the employee database.
3) E: Existing; P: Proposed
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 21 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 22 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 23 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 24 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 25 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 26 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Civil IT HR
CGM PP PP
GM PP PP
DGM PP
SM
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 27 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
CGM F&A
Existing Structure
Finance and accounts function is headed by a CGM. Finance section at present
is divided into ten sections. Each section is either headed by a DGM or SM and
each officer is responsible for multiple sections. The table below provides
details of the various activities in Finance and Accounts wing:
Some of the officers of the rank of SM have dual reporting. They are reporting to
the DGM for certain functions and are directly reporting to CGM for others. The
detailed organization structure of the Finance and Accounts function is given
below
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 28 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
CGM (F&A)
Pension Reconciliation
S.M-III S.M-V
S.M-I (Pension (Compilation (Establishment
and GPF) and subsidary
cash) and
Assistant reconcilliation)
Manager-II
S.M-IV S.M-VI
S.M-II (Budget (Compilation Corporate
and HQ Cash) and Corporate Finance (Audit)
Finance)
Structural Implications
Basis of Recommendations
The following table analyses and highlights the existing functions that are being
performed, functional heads who are performing them, and how they should be
aligned in the new structure. The To-Be structure has been designed to address
the current and future priorities of APDCL keeping in mind the structural
implications discussed earlier.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 29 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Existing
Broad Functions Proposed Functional Groups
Functional Heads
Budget & HQ Cash DGM - I Budget, Treasury
Billing & Subsidiary
DGM - III Budget, Treasury
cash
Compilation DGM - II Corporate Account, Taxation
Reconciliation DGM - III Corporate Account, Taxation
Taxation CGM Corporate Account, Taxation
Corporate Account CGM Corporate Account, Taxation
Corp Fin DGM - II Corporate Finance, Power Purchase, Project Finance
Power Purchase CGM Corporate Finance, Power Purchase, Project Finance
Project Finance CGM Corporate Finance, Power Purchase, Project Finance
GPF DGM - I Establishment
Establishment DGM - III Establishment
Pension DGM - I Establishment
GAD DGM - I Establishment
Audit DGM - III Assigned under Board Audit Committee
Director
F&A
GM
CGM
Corporate
F&A
Account, Taxation
DGM SM
DGM DGM
Corp Fin, Power Compilation,
Budget, Treasury Establishment
Purchase, Proj Fin Recons, Stat Audit
SM SM
SM SM
Bill payment, Establishment,
Corporate Finance Taxation
Suppliers GAD
SM
Pension, GPF,
NPS
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 30 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
F&A
Designation Remarks
E P
CGM 1 1
GM 1
DGM 3 3
One for CGM RE, One for each
SM 8 11
Zone and One for Internal audit
AM / DM / M* 25 25 F&A @one per circle
CMO
Total 37 42
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 31 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
GM GM
Tariff C om m ercial
SM
DGM
C entral Sector DGM DGM
Technical
CAZ & LLAZ UAZ
Inspection
SM
State Sector SM
SM (#2) SM
Technical
U AZ & LAZ UAZ
Inspection
SM
Pow er Trading
SM
Preparation of
Tariff
GM (Tariff)
GM (Tariff) is responsible for all power purchase, sale of power and other
regulatory matters. GM Tariff is supported by 4 SMs.
The work in the tariff section is divided as shown below:
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 32 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
GM (Commercial)
The Commercial function involves monitoring the commercial performance of all
the subdivisions and generating MIS reports. This department has to monitor at
the subdivision level also. At present, the commercial function is headed by the
GM commercial. GM Commercial is supported by 3 officers of the rank of DGM.
The work of monitoring the commercial performance is divided based on the
zones. Central and Lower Assam zone are looked after by one DGM and Upper
Assam Zone is looked after by another DGM.
Commercial function also has DGM Technical Inspection. DGM technical
inspection works as an enforcement agency and is responsible for carrying out
inspection of consumer premises for detection of irregularities.
Commercial complaints of consumers that are not resolved at the field level are
also handled by the commercial function. One manager is responsible for
handling all consumer complaints and one manager is responsible for legal
matters associated with commercial.
Basis of Recommendations
The following table analyses and highlights the existing functions that are being
performed, functional heads who are performing them, and how they should be
aligned in the new structure. The To-Be structure has been designed to address
the current and future priorities of APDCL keeping in mind the structural
implications discussed earlier.
Existing
Broad Functions Proposed Functional Groups
Functional Heads
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 33 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Existing
Broad Functions Proposed Functional Groups
Functional Heads
CGM
Commercial
GM GM
GM
Power Procur & Commercial, Energy
Regulatory, Tariff Audit, Cust Services
Load Mgt
DGM DGM
SM SM
Power Load
Regulatory Energy Audit
Procurement Management
SM (#2) SM
SM SM
Demand forecast Customer
Tariff, Complaince (#2)
& scheduling Services
SM
Commercial,
Revenue & Loss
Corporate
Electrical Total
Legal
Designation Remarks
E P E P E P
CGM 1 1 1 1
Enforcement position
GM 2 3 2 3
under zone office
DGM 3 3 1 3 4
Enforcement position
SM 8 9 8 9
under zone office
AM / DM / M 2 0 2
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 34 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Corporate
Electrical Total
Legal
Designation Remarks
E P E P E P
CMO / MO 0 0
Total 14 16 0 3 14 19
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 35 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
DGM HR
Existing Structure
Human resource function in APDCL is controlled by 3 DGMs. Each DGM looks
after one zone of the company. All postings and transfers within the zone are
managed by DGM of the zone. Inter zone transfers and promotions of the
executives are done by ASEB.
The detailed organization structure for the Human Resource function is given
below.
CMD
Structural Implications
Basis of Recommendations
The following table analyses and highlights the existing functions that are being
performed, functional heads who are performing them, and how they should be
aligned in the new structure. The To-Be structure has been designed to address
the current and future priorities of APDCL keeping in mind the structural
implications discussed earlier
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 36 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
D irector
HR
SM
CGM Chief M edical
Adm in, W elfare,
HR O fficer
IR
DGM DG M
Establishm ent Training, PM S
SM
SM
M anpower
Training
Planning, R ecruit
SM
SM
Perform ance
Establishm ent
Appraisals
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 37 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
HR Medical Total
Designation Remarks
E P E P E P
CGM 1 0 1
GM 0 0
DGM 3 2 3 2
SM 8 0 8 Additional @one per zone
AM / DM / M 2 15 2 15 @one per circle
CMO / MO 1 1 1 1
Total 5 26 1 1 6 27
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 38 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Existing Structure
The CGMs of respective zones head one entire zone and the respective
functions. He/she is responsible for the operations of the respective zones. Each
zone is further divided into circles, which are headed by DGMs. There are a few
functions which are handled by zone CGM' s and the same are also discussed
below.
The zone level structure for each zone varies and the same is shown below:
CGM GM GM
LAZ Field HQ
DGM
SM
Technical
(#4)
Inspection
DGM DGM
DGM DGM
Central Store Lower Assam Civil DGM
Civil APDRP
Circle Circle Jorhat
SM
DGM DGM
Guwahati Building DGM
Technical Materials
Division Circle (#5)
GM
LAZ
CGM
CAZ
DGM
Circle (#6)
DGM
DGM DGM
Technical
Circle (#2)
Inspection
DGM
Circle (#2)
Note: The position under each broad box is reporting directly to CGM LAZ
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 39 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Structural Implications
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 40 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Director PMU
Project Management Unit (PMU) acts as the coordinating agency for the Assam
Power Sector Development Project (APSDP) and Assam Power Sector
Enhancement Investment Programme, funded by Asian Development Bank
(ADB). APSDP has been withdrawn in June 2009. Of the 13 packages 10
packages have been completed and remaining three are likely to completed by
February 2010.
Under the Assam Power Sector Enhancement Investment Programme total
investment of 314.6 million USD is being invested. Out of these 200 million USD
is in the form of loan by ADB and 114.6 million USD is being invested by
Government of Assam.
Project Management Unit is headed by Director (PMU), and is supported by one
DGM and 4 numbers of S.M. DGM has the responsibility of monitoring the works
of all the officers of PMU. The detailed organization structure of PMU and
division of work is given below.
Director (PMU)
DGM
S.M-I S.M-II
(Environment S.M-III S.M-IV
(Project
and (Nodal (Project
rehabilation) implementatio
Officer) Monitoring)
n)
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 41 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Basis of Recommendations
The following table analyses and highlights the existing functions that are being
performed, functional heads who are performing them, and how they should be
aligned in the new structure. The To-Be structure has been designed to address
the current and future priorities of APDCL keeping in mind the structural
implications discussed earlier.
"# $ !
!
% & ' (
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 42 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
) &* '
+
, - , , - .. -
, + #/
% #/ + , - .. -
.
&0 - 1 , - .. -
*' . , ' .
* * * * -
2 * 2 *
CGM GM
Material RAPDRP
Management
SM (#2)
GM 10th Plan APDRP
DGM
Mtrls, Tendering,
Stores
Procurement
SM
RAPDRP
SM SM
(#4) (#3)-one per zone SM
IT, New Billing
Software
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 43 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Projects Civil
GM GM
Projects Civil
DGM DGM SM
Projects Design Design
SM (#3) SM
SM
MRT (#1), PMU Coordination
(#3)
(#1), Projects (#1)
DGM CGM
IT Implementation Zone
& MIS
SM DGM SM SM
GM
Commercial, MIS Enforcement,
HQ, Tech Establishment F&A
Theft Raids
SM DGM
SM Technical, Project Enforcement
Support functions Coordination One per 2/3 circle
(Finance, HR)
SM
SM
Enforcement
IT
One per 2/3 circle
SM
CRM
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 44 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
CGM 4 4 4 4
GM 6 6 1 1 1 7 8
DGM 9 12 2 1 11 13
SM 29 26 19 17 6 1 1 49 50
CMO / MO 0 0
Total 48 48 21 18 15 22 1 1 1 1 86 90
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 45 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Rural Electrification
Rural electrification work in Assam is being carried out under Rajiv Gandhi
Grameen Vidyutikaran Youjna. Implementation of this scheme is being done by
rural electrification department.
RGGVY Scheme in Assam is being implemented in 17 districts by APDCL. For
the implementation of scheme all activities related to coordination with Power
Grid, REC, Government of Assam and Ministry of Power Government of India is
done by the Head Quarter. Apart from that preparation of scheme, awarding of
tenders etc is also done by the head quarters and actual implementation is done
by distribution circles.
Rural Electrification department presently is headed by MD of AEGCL. He is
supported by one GM, one DGM, and 7 SMs. Each SM at HQ is taking care of
3-4 districts of Assam and responsibility of execution of schemes in each district
is given to the SM present in the Electrical circle of that district.
Detailed organization structure for Rural electrification department is shown
below:
CGM
GM
DGM
S.M
S.M (LAZ-I) S.M (LAZ-II) S.M (CAZ) S.M (UAZ-I) S.M (UAZ-II) S.M (F&A)
(Renewable)
Structural Implications
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 46 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Basis of Recommendations
The following table analyses and highlights the existing functions that are being
performed, functional heads who are performing them, and how they should be
aligned in the new structure. The To-Be structure has been designed to address
the current and future priorities of APDCL keeping in mind the structural
implications discussed earlier.
Existing Functional
Broad Functions Proposed Functional Groups
Heads
- -
+ $ $
$ ' .
+ 3
, +
$ +
' .
. & *$.
'1 1
& &
CGM
Rural
Electrification
SM DGM
Renewable RE
SM
SM
(#5) 2 LAZ &
F&A
UAZ, 1 CAZ
Electrical Total
Designation Remarks
E P E P
CGM 1 0 1
GM 1 1 0
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 47 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Electrical Total
Designation Remarks
E P E P
DGM 1 1 1 1
SM 6 6 6 6
AM / DM / M 0 0
CMO / MO 0 0
Total 8 8 8 8
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 48 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
3
IRCA + MTI Divisions also
There are currently 154 Sub Divisions, 43 Divisions, 15 Circles and 3 Zones for
O&M and commercial activities. The broad roles & responsibilities are discussed
below:
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 49 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 50 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
DGM
Circle (4-6)
SM
SM
Projects / RE
Division (3-5)
Execution
Technical Wing
SM
SM Elect (#1), SM
IRCA
Civil (#1)
Support Wing
SM One AM each for
MTI Establish, IT and
Accounts
SM
Energy Audit /
SPPS
GM 0 0
DGM 15 15 15 15
SM 118 118 118 118
AM / DM / M 0 0
CMO / MO 0 0
Total 133 133 133 133
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 51 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
energy audit systems at field level. This can take approximately 3-4 years
time.
After the introduction of metering technology like AMR metering, IT enabled
billing for industrial / HT consumers, the position of SM IRCA at each circle
needs to be moved to zone level for handling all such consumers under
respective zones instead handling at circle level. This largely depends upon
the decision to implement such technology initiatives.
The average number of consumers per circle in APDCL is approx 1.2 lacs.
The average number of consumers per circle among other state utilities from
Punjab, MP, Maharashtra and Gujarat is 2-4 lacs. This requires APDCL to
review its number of circle offices periodically.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 52 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Conclusion
Conclusion
This chapter highlights the key recommendations / changes proposed for re-
designing of organization structure of APDCL. The details of the same are
covered in the previous chapters of this report.
The highlights of the human resource profiling carried out for the existing
employees of the company are as follows:
o The average employee age of the company is approximately
52 years and approximately 54% of the existing workforce will
superannuate during next 8 years. Therefore, the company
requires an immediate focus on manpower planning and linked
recruitment plans to induct employee at entry level.
The main recommendations made at the Company Board level are as
follows:
o The introduction of 4 board level functional directors namely
Director Operations, Director Projects & Material
Management, Director Human Resource and Director
Finance & Accounts. These board level director positions are
in addition to the existing position of CMD of APDCL.
o The positions of functional directors at Board level need to be
selected on the basis of merit and functional requirements, and
need not be treated as posts of promotion.
o The introduction of these positions at Board level will enhance
the corporate governance framework, enable greater
representation of company at board level and effective
decision making for company operations.
o As informed during stakeholder discussions, the appointment
of functional directors requires certain changes in the Article of
Association of the company, which might take some time to
incorporate. Therefore, as an interim arrangement, instead of
directors, the executive directors (ED) positions are proposed.
The main changes proposed at the Corporate and Field level are as follows:
o The span of control of CMD has been reduced to 8 from 14
positions, by clustering core business functions together and
aligning them under one umbrella.
o Internal audit has been proposed as a separate function to
maintain independence while carrying out audit activities. The
function will take care of internal and statutory audit and should
preferably be supported by external auditing firms. The internal
audit function will report to board audit committee.
o A centralized legal cell has been proposed at the corporate
office for handling all commercial and employee legal cases for
the company. The legal cell will handle cases related to land
acquisitions, consumer complaints, employee complaints,
recovery of unpaid amounts, commercial etc.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 53 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Corporate
Electrical Civil F&A HR IT Medical Security Secretariat Total
Designation Legal
E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P
CGM 5 6 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8
GM 9 9 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 10 12
DGM 28 31 2 0 3 3 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 38
SM 161 159 19 17 8 11 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 189 202
AM / DM / M* 365 365 0 0 25 25 2 15 0 2 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 407 422
CMO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 568 570 21 18 37 41 5 26 0 3 15 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 649 683
Note:
1) The numbers mentioned in above table are based on our discussions at corporate
office and on assumption that all the field level circle heads and division heads
positions are filled.
2) *: The count of AM / DM / M is based on the employee database.
3) E: Existing; P: Proposed
The benchmarking of organization structure was carried out with other state
utilities in India and based on the learning from the benchmarking exercise,
the new structure for the company was proposed.
The following solutions have been proposed to address the concerns of the
stakeholders of the company:
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 54 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 55 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
MSEDCL
Illustrative Top Level Org Structure of MSEDCL is shown below.
ILLUSTRATIVE
Top Level Org Chart
Maharashtra State Electricity
Managing Distribution Company Limited
Director
Director
Company
Vigilance &
Secretary
Security
Regional
ED CGM CGM CE ED
Executive Director
Commercial Personnel F&A Internal Reforms Projects
(#3)
CE CE CGM CE CE
Zone (#11) Commercial IT APDRP Infrastructure
CE CE
Chief Proj Manage CE
Load Central Purchase
MIS Spl Projects
Management Agency
CE CGM CE CE
Power Purchase Internal Audit Distribution Material Mgt
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 56 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Main Observations
The organization is structured functionally with key function operations,
finance, HR, vigilance etc reporting to Managing director directly.
Single point accountability for operations is built at corporate level. The
function is responsible for monitoring and action planning for O&M
activities.
Regional / zonal structure in place at the field level with accountability of
operation and commercial activities of zone to ensure that the corporate
level is not involved in day-to-day field operations and focused towards
strategic role.
The zonal heads are functional from distinct locations and the locations
are within the jurisdiction of their operational area.
Emphasis on corporate planning function, responsible for internal reforms,
ADPRD, special projects and regulatory compliances.
Finance and accounts department is responsible for finance, internal audit,
IT and MIS projects and reporting to MD directly.
Focus is given on vigilance function to reduce theft and energy pilferage.
The function is reporting to MD and has presence at field offices also to
ease the implementation of anti theft policies.
Enhanced focus on HR function with upgrading the HR head post to the
level of ED and it is reporting to MD directly. The post of ED HR is
introduced couple of years back.
UHBVN
Illustrative Top Level Org Structure of UHBVN is shown below: (source:
www.uhbvn.com)
ILLUSTRATIVE
Chairman Top Level Org Chart
Uttar Haryana Bijli
Vitran Nigam Limited
Managing
Director
Company
Vigilance
Secretary
SE Const.
GM SE GM FA & CAO SE GM
Panchkula &
PD&C Civil Regulatory Affairs MM Stores & WK Purchase I&II
Rohtak
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 57 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Main Observations
The organization is structured functionally with key function technical,
finance, Admin reporting to Managing director directly
Accountability of field operations is shared between technical heads at
corporate level. The function is responsible for monitoring and action
planning for O&M activities
Zonal structure in place at the field level with accountability of operation
and commercial activities of zone. The zonal heads are based at distinct
locations within the jurisdiction of their operational area
Finance and accounts department is responsible for finance, internal audit,
IT and reporting to MD directly. Adequate emphasis is given to audit
function. The regulatory function is handled by finance head.
The technical functions like material management, system operation,
construction, metering are shared between both the technical heads
HR & Admin function is reporting to MD directly.
APCPDCL
Illustrative Top Level Org Structure of APCPDCL is shown below: (source:
www.apcentral.com)
ILLUSTRATIVE
Chairman & Top Level Org Chart
Managing AP Central Power Distribution
Director Company Limited
Public Relation GM
Officer Corp Planning
SE SE CGM CGM GM
Circles Circles P&MM HRD IT
GM SE CGM GM
EA M&P IR Cost
Main
SE
Observations
SCADA
The organization is
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 58 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Key Learning
In the table given below we have summarized the key learnings from the
benchmarking of the organization structures of different utilities.
Structural
imperative Learning Comparison with APDCL
Structural basis All organizations are structured as APDCL has functional
functional structures. Few structures. But some Functions
organizations have regional are reporting to CGM
structure for operations operations.
Functional Organizations have clustered most Most of the functions are not
clustering of the core functions together clustered together. For example
R-APDRP is with CGM (LAZ)
but RGGVY is with CGM/
transmission
Operations Organizations have representation For Operations APDCL has
of operations at corporate level with single point responsibility, where
single point accountability for O&M a DGM is responsible for the
activities in field. operations of the circle in field
Commercial and Most organizations have the APDCL also has regulatory and
regulatory regulatory function combined with commercial function together
the commercial department and and is headed by a CGM
focus to ARR & tariff filling and
handling regulatory compliances
Projects Project is a clearly defined function Projects is not clearly defined
in organization whereas, in few it is and different projects are being
clubbed with operations handled by different groups
Material Mostly, MM is looking for stores as MM function is divided into 2
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 59 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
Structural
imperative Learning Comparison with APDCL
Management well procurement function and is parts material procurement and
clubbed under either operations or stores. Again some procurement
projects. is being done at zonal level (By
CGM operations) and some at
company level
Finance All organizations have defined F&A F&A is a separate function
function reporting directly to the reporting directly to CMD
head of organization
Company The CS function is reporting to head The CS function is directly
secretary of the organization directly except in reporting to Board / CMD
few cases where it is clubbed under
F&A or HR function
Internal audit Function is clubbed under F&A Function is clubbed under F&A
function with adequate focus on function but adequate focus is
audit missing
Information IT is a clearly dedicated function in The IT function is not present in
technology all organizations for IT planning & APDCL and IT related activities
implementation. In most of the are being clubbed with R-
organizations, it is working under APDRP
F&A head
Human resource HR is an important department in all No central HR functions. Work is
organizations with a direct reporting distributed at zonal level and
to head of the organization certain important functions like
inter zone transfers and
promotions are being done at
ASEB
Vigilance All organization show adequate APDCL has a Director Vigilance
focus towards vigilance function. (Employee vigilance) but field
Mostly, head of vigilance is reporting level vigilance is not present
to head of the organization but field
vigilance is working along with
operations at field level
Communication Most organizations have a distinct Communication and PR function
and PR communication department for is not present in APDCL and
communication and public relations. needs to be established. As a
This function either report directly public utility it is important to
head of the organization or forms a communicate organization
part of larger function such as HR policies and actions to general
public and key stake holders.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 60 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
This summarizes some key issues raised during various stakeholder meetings
at head quarter and field offices and the summary of discussions took place is
as follows:
The location of The appropriate zone office location was discussed for CAZ
CAZ zone as the CAZ has wide spread
office The splitting the zone in two parts was also discussed
It was discussed to highlight this during stakeholder
presentation / discussion
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 61 of 63
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
PricewaterhouseCoopers Page 62 of 63
pwc.com
Redesigning the Organization Structure for APDCL
2010 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and
PricewaterhouseCoopers
independent legal entity. *connectedthinking is a trademark of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (US). Page 63 of 63