MARKING GUIDELINES FOR PRESENTATION

SCALE AND WEIGHTAGE CRITERIA

GRADE (20%)
Content and coverage
Very capable in accessing and managing information from various
sources.
Content coverage is very wide, accurate, relevant and detailed.
Very clear relationship of ideas.
Very Comprehensive, extensive and current knowledge.
Very criticial content
Very comprehensive and accurate ideas and issues.
Very capable in elaborating and thinking skills eg. Explaining , analyzing
and evaluating discussion.
VERY
Organization
EXCELLENT
18.0-20.0% Excellent, logical and coherent write up/sequence
A+
90 -100 Ideas are comprehensively developed with clear examples, explaination
and added elaboration.

Language and presentation

Presentation is stable, smooth and exudes confidence.
Very clear voice tone with very appropriate intonation.
Very clear, accurate and easily understood language

Personality
Show high commitment, very excellent involvement and team
collaboration.

Content and coverage

Capable in accessing and managing information from various sources.
Content coverage is wide, accurate, relevant and detailed.
Clear relationship of ideas.
Comprehensive, extensive and current knowledge.
Very criticial content
Comprehensive and accurate ideas and issues.
capable in elaborating and thinking skills eg. explaining , analyzing and
evaluating the discussion.
Excellent
Organization
A, A- 15.0-17.8%
good, logical and coherent write up/sequence
80 - 89 Ideas are comprehensively developed with clear facts and sufficient
examples to support points
Language and presentation
Presentation is stable,smooth and exudes confidence
clear voice with appropriate intonation and tone
clear, accurate and easily understood language

Personality
Show high commitment, excellent involvement and team collaboration

Content and coverage

capable in accessing and managing information from various sources.
Content coverage is wide, accurate, relevant and detailed.
Clear relationship of ideas.
Comprehensive, extensive and current knowledge.
Criticial content

5
SCALE AND WEIGHTAGE CRITERIA
GRADE (20%)
Comprehensive and accurate ideas and issues.
Capable in elaborating and thinking skills eg. explaining , analyzing and
evaluating discussion.
Organization
Quite good write up/sequence with minor mistakes
Ideas are developed with some facts and examples.
Kepujian
Language and presentation
B+, B dan B-
Confident presentation
12.0-14.8%
Presentation is quite clear with proper intonation and tone
60-74
Language is quite clear and comprehensible

Personality
Show quite high commitment, involvement and team collaboration

Content and coverage

Able to access and manage information from various sources.
Content coverage is not wide, accurate, relevant nor detailed.
Relationship of ideas is not clear
Knowledge is not so comprehensive, extensive and current.
Less criticial content
Less comprehensive and accurate ideas and issues.
Less capable in elaborating and thinking skills eg. Explaining , analyzing
and evaluating discussion.

Organization
Pass
quite good write up/sequence with significant mistakes
C+ , C
10.0-11.8% some Ideas are developed with some facts and examples.
50 - 59
Language and presentation
Presentation less clear and fluent. Intonation and tone of voice not as
good
Less confident
Inaccurate and less comprehensible language.

Personality
Show low commitment, involvement and team collaboration

Content and coverage

Gagal 0-9.8% Unable to access and manage information from various sources.
C-,D+, D, E Content coverage is not wide and irrelevant.
dan F Relationship of ideas is blur.
Knowledge is not so comprehensive, extensive and current.
0-49 Very little criticial content
Ideas are not analysed logically
Incapable in elaborating and thinking skills eg. Explaining , analyzing and
evaluating discussion.
Organization
Weak write up/sequence with glaring mistakes
Ideas weakly developed with insufficient facts and little elaboration.

Language and presentation

Presentation not clear and fluent with unsuitable voice tone
Unstable and low confidence Presentation
Unclear, inaccurate and incomprehensible language.

Personality

6
SCALE AND WEIGHTAGE CRITERIA
GRADE (20%)
Very low comittment, involvement and collaboration.

MARKING GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC WRITING

SCALE AND WEIGHTAGE CRITERIA

GRADE (30%)
Content and coverage
Very capable in accessing ideas and alternative solutions
Style of writing depicts very extensive, broad and current knowledge with
regard to emotional issues among students and teachers.
Broad and consistent coverage.
Very accurate, relevant and detailed review.
Choice and scope of literature review is very comprehensive and
suitable.
Relationship of ideas are very clearly shown and comprehensible

Creative and critical Discussion

High ability in developing and analysing ideas and solutions in the
discussion.
Conceptual understanding applied effectively
Practical, creative and critical discussion in analyzing and synthesizing
ideas and issues on how to handle emotional problems among teachers
and students accurately and broadly.
Points supported by very accurate and strong evidence.
Show high ability in discussing current research related to emotional
Very issues among teachers and students.
excellent Able to make comprehensive conclusions and readers thought
A+ effectively
27.0-30.0%
90 -100
Organization
Excellent organization of information.
Excellent , logical and coherent write-up.
Developed ideas are broad and clear with examples and evidence
based on reliable sources
Excellent explanation and added elaboration

Language
Excellent language usage in the write up of accurate ideas.
Suitable, broad and variety of vocabulary usage
Very accurate and suitable Sentence structure and language style
No spelling errors

Quality of References
Very skillful in quoting and listing reference and bibliography
Bibliography well written
Variety of primary and secondary sources.

Content and coverage

excellent Very capable in accessing ideas and alternative solutions
A, A-

7
SCALE AND WEIGHTAGE CRITERIA
GRADE (30%)
Style of writing depicts broad and currrent knowledge with regard to
emotional issues among students and teachers.
Broad and consistent coverage.
Accurate, relevant and detailed review.
Choice of literature review is comprehensive and suitable.
Relationship of ideas is clearly shown and comprehensible

Creative and critical Discussion

High ability in developing and analysing ideas and solutions in the
discussion.
Conceptual understanding applied effectively
Practical and critical discussion in analyzing and synthesizing ideas and
issues on how to handle emotional problems among teachers and
students accurately and broadly.
Points supported by clear and strong evidence.
Show high ability in discussing current research related to emotional
issues among teachers and students.
Able to make good conclusions and readers thought effectively

22.5-26.7%
80 - 89 Organization
Good Organization of information.
logical and coherent write-up.
Developed ideas are good and clear with suitable examples
Good explanation and elaboration

Language
Good language usage in the write up of accurate ideas.
Suitable and broad vocabulaty usage
Correct and suitable Sentence structure and attractive language style
No spelling errors

Quality of References
skillful in quoting and listing reference and bibliography
Bibliography well written
Variety of primary and secondary sources
Minimal mistakes in quoting references

Content and coverage

able to access ideas and suggest alternative solutions
Style of writing depicts quite good knowledge with regard to emotional
issues among students and teachers.
Sufficient and consistent coverage.
Very accurate, relevant and detailed review.
Literature scope is quite suitable.
Relationship of ideas are quite clear

Creative and critical Discussion

Able to develop and analyse ideas and solutions in the discussion.
Credit
B+, B and B- Conceptual understanding applied quite effectively
18.0-22.5% Practical, creative discussion in analyzing and synthizing ideas and
60-74 issues on how to handle emotional problems among teachers and
students accurately and broadly.
Points supported by quite clear and strong evidence.
Show ability in discussing current research related to emotional issues
among teachers and students.

8
SCALE AND WEIGHTAGE CRITERIA
GRADE (30%)
Able to make conclusions and dwell into readers thought effectively

Organization
Quite good Organization of information.
Quite good write-up, with some flaws in certain sections
Developed ideas are quite good and clear with some suitable examples
Quite good explanation and elaboration

Language
Quite Good language usage
Quite Suitable vocabulary usage
Correct and suitable Sentence structure, with some mistakes in the
language style in some sections
Some spelling errors

Quality of References
skillful in quoting and listing only on certain reference and bibliography
Bibliography quite well written
Sufficient primary and secondary sources
minimal mistakes in quoting references

Content and coverage

able to access ideas and suggest alternative solutions
Style of writing depicts unsatisfactory knowledge with regard to emotional
issues among students and teachers.
insufficient and inconsistent coverage.
Inaccurate and irrelevant review.
Literature scope is not suitable.
Relationship of ideas are unclear

Creative and critical Discussion

Able to develop and analyse ideas and solutions in the discussion.
Conceptual understanding applied ineffectively
Discussion is not practical nor creative in analyzing and synthizing ideas
and issues on how to handle emotional problems among teachers and
students.
Points not supported by accurate and strong evidence.
Show low ability in discussing current research related to emotional
Pass issues among teachers and students.
C+ , C 15.0-17.7% unable to make conclusions and dwell into readers thought effectively

50 - 59
Organization
Weak rganization of information.
Poor write-up with some minor mistakes
Developed ideas are not clear with examples and not convincing
Insufficient explaination and elaboration

Language
Not so good language usage in the write up
unsuitable vocabulary usage
some incorrect Sentence structure and mistake in language style in
most sections of the essay
multiple spelling errors

Quality of References

9
SCALE AND WEIGHTAGE CRITERIA
GRADE (30%)
some relevant reference and bibliography
Bibliography not quite well written
limited primary and secondary sources
multiple mistakes in quoting references

Content and coverage

Unable to access ideas and suggest alternative solutions
Style of writing depicts unsatisfacory knowledge with regard to emotional
issues among students and teachers.
Insufficient and inconsistent coverage.
Inaccurate and irrelevant review.
Literature scope is clearly unsuitable.
No Relationship of ideas

Creative and critical Discussion

unable to develop and analyse ideas and solutions in the discussion.
Conceptual understanding applied very ineffectively
Discussion is not practical in analyzing and synthizing ideas and issues
on how to handle emotional problems among teachers and students.
Points not supported by any evidence.
Unable to discuss current research related to emotional issues among
teachers and students.
unable to make conclusions and dwell into readers thought effectively

Fail
C-,D+, D, E Organization
and F 0-14.7% Very poor Organization of information.
Every poor write-up with glaring mistakes
0-49 Developed ideas are not clear with examples and not convincing
very little explaination and no elaboration

Language
Bad language usage in the write up
unsuitable vocabulary usage
incorrect sentence structure and mistakes in language style.
multiple spelling errors
Quality of References
Poor reference and bibliography
Bibliography not well written and does not conform to APA style
Very limited primary and secondary sources

10