Methodology Summary

This is my way of doing for the synthesis. This is my idea of the work of synthe
sis, complemented with ideas of prof I had in IUFM.
Lecture note-taking for development • Review • Read the problem given the variou
s texts of synthesis in relation to this problem: to eliminate immediately the i
deas that have no link with the problem. If not already numbered lines 5 to 5. •
Taking notes: I made a table (or worksheet per text) where I list ideas of each
text by restating through respective line. Then stabilo with different color hi
ghlights I like the ideas or report all the texts (eg text 1 and 2 may refer to
the same idea but with different perspective, in this case I highlights the same
color but a differently). If harvest of good ideas, not more than three colors
(max 4 for me but if you get to 4 is that ideas are not well understood) problem
if not properly identified. • Having successfully made the previous section is
the most work because it has already reformulated so when writing will not deliv
er to paraphrase the ideas of the docs will be rewritten in a more personal and
faithful while not forgetting neutrality and objectivity of the two key words of
a synthesis. • After just for me I made the plan as a phrase associated with 1
+2 +3 = entire sentence. • In each game, 2-3 in part, or we match our idea of te
xt and table to not have to look for ideas and references to the reformulated te
xt around and waste time. Attribute ideas to the document, reference to incorpor
ate the phrase. • To summarize the development: • Each party must be clearly def
ined and focused: an overview per game • Need guiding the reader must be able to
read and understand the documents read only our synthesis. The under parts are
there for. • Everything must be written • Not more than 1 or 2 citation (s) in t
he copy, so the spell will see more than paraphrase and think that you do not or
ganize and reformulate and take ownership of a document.
• In each major party to speak all the documents. In each subpart must speak at
least two documents, one must compare the documents. In summary, we must speak o
f agreements and disagreements between the documents. • Skip a line between each
major party and return to the line between each major subpart. • Theme Introduc
tion / Overview • About the Portfolio documents Device: author / editor, the sou
rce (the original doc, book section, book), types of docs (text, manual ...), da
te of publication (note the differences between documents, in the news)), intend
ed audience (students, teachers, parents, general public, specialist ...) • Do n
ot hesitate to combine the docs. • Do not put forward ideas in the intro: seed i
deas in § • Problem: question that directs the synthesis reformulates possibly d
irects our investigation. • Announcement of the plan • Conclusion Resuming the i
ssue / problem • Define how documents are positioned (convergence, divergence, c
omplementarity • If the opening time but not mandatory, it must be relevant • Re
member that the spell will wear a lot of attention intro and conclusion (beginni
ng end) and you let him go to print. If your conclusion is too sloppy: tendency
to be less forgiving if it was good: the baba.