Anda di halaman 1dari 2

Dear President of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal.

Based on the CONSTITUTION OF T


HE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL FOR 1988 TITLE II - Rights and Fundamental Guarant
ees, CHAPTER I DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE, Article 5 Al
l are equal before the law, without distinction whatsoever, guaranteeing Brazili
ans and foreigners residing in the country the inviolable right to life, liberty
, equality, safety and property, as follows: XXXIV - are ensured to everyone, re
gardless of the payment of fees: a) the right to petition the Government in defe
nse of rights or against illegal acts or abuse of power, I come, very respectful
ly, suggests that this Court, modernize the electoral code in order to allow ANY
Brazilian law can exercise Comprised of which I'm doing science and use, more b
roadly, this concerns, the concrete fact that we "poor mortals, to face extreme
difficulties, in such a negative context, we are noticed by the authorities, som
etimes Represented by the Superior Electoral Court. Suggested Modernization - Wh
at this court, use of all facilities and professionals who have to modernize the
practice of consultation, questions and proposals, since it is international co
nsensus on the use of "internet" for such practices are facilitated and , that t
he "internet", subject to certain safety standards, is a safe and reliable, sinc
e the very TSE is used to speed it to the polls Claims, as well as correspondenc
e (emails) "exchanged" the "network" are already considered "trusted" by way of
evidence in legal proceedings. Motivational premise - This suggestion, in partic
ular, is related to the most important moment in the history of Elections, there
fore, we are experiencing a grateful awareness of established power to act in re
spect to rights are, so that responsibilities are historically denied and renega
de being properly assumes, at then, I force myself to make every effort to me ar
e allowed by law, to try to participate in a proactive way, construction and dev
elopment of criteria fair and legitimate that can add to the vote of every citiz
en to Respectability Credibility and intrinsically worthy, and, in embarrassing
situations, for example, be a national driving Political Party (PTB) for citizen
with political rights suspended due to impeachment process.
Tip Modernization Process Consultation Superior Electoral Court Square Superior
Courts - C BrasÍlia - DF CEP 70096-900
Premise of the suggestion - I understand that the TSE, similarly to all of Brazi
lian society should create an internal organ such as an ombudsman, where it woul
d have the responsibility to centralize all matches, in order to analyze them in
the first instance, filtering and adjusting them to the procedural requirements
specified by law, to give way to those regarded as relevant and pertinent, ther
efore, the TSE would expand the potential of the proposal contained in our Const
itution, beyond what we are recognizing today that criteria and definitions cont
ained Electoral Code, renowned during the dictatorship, are totally consistent w
ith democratic practices experienced by the Government and non-governmental, not
less than two (2) decades, so that justice is accessible to ALL, is first neces
sary the established power, represented by this Court, and BE ACCESSIBLE TO RECO
GNIZE, somehow, to all citizens regardless of their origin, creed, ethnicity and
culture. The situation described above is part of the following concrete fact (
reply, reproduced below, received by me): "Your search is being assisted by the
Coordination of Decisions of the TSE, the sector is responsible for the selectio
n, analysis and research of decisions of this Court. We do not opine it or give
opinion on the question posed by V.S th, or any other unit of the Court, as embo
died in Resolution No. 20 802, of 10.5.2001. consultative activity within the El
ectoral Court is exclusive of the courts, so understood the Ministers and judges
, through formal consultations conducted by persons legitimated by the Electoral
Code (Law No. 4.737/65), art. 23 XII. "Therefore, an Act of 1965, created durin
g the dictatorship, steeped in isolation, based on a presumed importance of inst
itutional superiority, privilege restrictive, preventing the TOTAL TRANSPARENCY,
self-sufficiency, featuring the presumed superiority of legal knowledge, as not
only how, but mainly as the content and essence. 1.€Breakdown of Tip - Once re
cognized the need to update the procedures for the relationship between this Cou
rt and the Brazilian people, standards and procedures that are based on the use
of "internet" should be defined, as well as the creation of the ombudsman should
be supported in the Legal Instrument itself, to assess and develop any represen
tation which may be needed against the clamor and concerns expressed, which in s
ummary, will re-existing concept that this Court can not lead this Court, which
might be considered extreme surrealism, after all , the search for perfection sh
ould be a concern for any living organism (abstract or concrete), when then, the
re should be examples, multiple, that this Court, not one but several times, has
caused this Court to contribute to improvement of the "old" compared to "new."
Tip Modernization Process Consultation Superior Electoral Court Square Superior
Courts - C BrasÍlia - DF CEP 70096-900
2. Breakdown of Suggestion - Recognition by this Court, that any Brazilians can
help fit for development, credibility and respectability of the electoral proces
s (judicial or otherwise), confirming forcefully the importance of their partici
pation in all levels of the Process election, and most importantly, adding to th
e Constitution Forms and procedures that augment and reshape the understanding o
f the applicability of his 5. Article, where here, to extol a "Long live democra
cy." Sincerely,
Plinio Marcos Moreira da Rocha Rua Gustavo Sampaio on. 112 apt. 603 RUDDER - Rio
de Janeiro CEP 22010-010 Tel (21) 2542-7710 or 2295-7208 Occupation - Systems A
nalyst
Tip Modernization Process Consultation Superior Electoral Court Square Superior
Courts - C BrasÍlia - DF CEP 70096-900

Anda mungkin juga menyukai