HE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL FOR 1988 TITLE II - Rights and Fundamental Guarant ees, CHAPTER I DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE, Article 5 Al l are equal before the law, without distinction whatsoever, guaranteeing Brazili ans and foreigners residing in the country the inviolable right to life, liberty , equality, safety and property, as follows: XXXIV - are ensured to everyone, re gardless of the payment of fees: a) the right to petition the Government in defe nse of rights or against illegal acts or abuse of power, I come, very respectful ly, suggests that this Court, modernize the electoral code in order to allow ANY Brazilian law can exercise Comprised of which I'm doing science and use, more b roadly, this concerns, the concrete fact that we "poor mortals, to face extreme difficulties, in such a negative context, we are noticed by the authorities, som etimes Represented by the Superior Electoral Court. Suggested Modernization - Wh at this court, use of all facilities and professionals who have to modernize the practice of consultation, questions and proposals, since it is international co nsensus on the use of "internet" for such practices are facilitated and , that t he "internet", subject to certain safety standards, is a safe and reliable, sinc e the very TSE is used to speed it to the polls Claims, as well as correspondenc e (emails) "exchanged" the "network" are already considered "trusted" by way of evidence in legal proceedings. Motivational premise - This suggestion, in partic ular, is related to the most important moment in the history of Elections, there fore, we are experiencing a grateful awareness of established power to act in re spect to rights are, so that responsibilities are historically denied and renega de being properly assumes, at then, I force myself to make every effort to me ar e allowed by law, to try to participate in a proactive way, construction and dev elopment of criteria fair and legitimate that can add to the vote of every citiz en to Respectability Credibility and intrinsically worthy, and, in embarrassing situations, for example, be a national driving Political Party (PTB) for citizen with political rights suspended due to impeachment process. Tip Modernization Process Consultation Superior Electoral Court Square Superior Courts - C BrasÃlia - DF CEP 70096-900 Premise of the suggestion - I understand that the TSE, similarly to all of Brazi lian society should create an internal organ such as an ombudsman, where it woul d have the responsibility to centralize all matches, in order to analyze them in the first instance, filtering and adjusting them to the procedural requirements specified by law, to give way to those regarded as relevant and pertinent, ther efore, the TSE would expand the potential of the proposal contained in our Const itution, beyond what we are recognizing today that criteria and definitions cont ained Electoral Code, renowned during the dictatorship, are totally consistent w ith democratic practices experienced by the Government and non-governmental, not less than two (2) decades, so that justice is accessible to ALL, is first neces sary the established power, represented by this Court, and BE ACCESSIBLE TO RECO GNIZE, somehow, to all citizens regardless of their origin, creed, ethnicity and culture. The situation described above is part of the following concrete fact ( reply, reproduced below, received by me): "Your search is being assisted by the Coordination of Decisions of the TSE, the sector is responsible for the selectio n, analysis and research of decisions of this Court. We do not opine it or give opinion on the question posed by V.S th, or any other unit of the Court, as embo died in Resolution No. 20 802, of 10.5.2001. consultative activity within the El ectoral Court is exclusive of the courts, so understood the Ministers and judges , through formal consultations conducted by persons legitimated by the Electoral Code (Law No. 4.737/65), art. 23 XII. "Therefore, an Act of 1965, created durin g the dictatorship, steeped in isolation, based on a presumed importance of inst itutional superiority, privilege restrictive, preventing the TOTAL TRANSPARENCY, self-sufficiency, featuring the presumed superiority of legal knowledge, as not only how, but mainly as the content and essence. 1.ÂBreakdown of Tip - Once re cognized the need to update the procedures for the relationship between this Cou rt and the Brazilian people, standards and procedures that are based on the use of "internet" should be defined, as well as the creation of the ombudsman should be supported in the Legal Instrument itself, to assess and develop any represen tation which may be needed against the clamor and concerns expressed, which in s ummary, will re-existing concept that this Court can not lead this Court, which might be considered extreme surrealism, after all , the search for perfection sh ould be a concern for any living organism (abstract or concrete), when then, the re should be examples, multiple, that this Court, not one but several times, has caused this Court to contribute to improvement of the "old" compared to "new." Tip Modernization Process Consultation Superior Electoral Court Square Superior Courts - C BrasÃlia - DF CEP 70096-900 2. Breakdown of Suggestion - Recognition by this Court, that any Brazilians can help fit for development, credibility and respectability of the electoral proces s (judicial or otherwise), confirming forcefully the importance of their partici pation in all levels of the Process election, and most importantly, adding to th e Constitution Forms and procedures that augment and reshape the understanding o f the applicability of his 5. Article, where here, to extol a "Long live democra cy." Sincerely, Plinio Marcos Moreira da Rocha Rua Gustavo Sampaio on. 112 apt. 603 RUDDER - Rio de Janeiro CEP 22010-010 Tel (21) 2542-7710 or 2295-7208 Occupation - Systems A nalyst Tip Modernization Process Consultation Superior Electoral Court Square Superior Courts - C BrasÃlia - DF CEP 70096-900